Advantages & Applications of MBBR Technologies

Similar documents
Global Leaders in Biological Wastewater Treatment

BIOSPHERE MOVING BED BIOLOGICAL SYSTEMS

We Know Water. AnoxKaldnes. Moving Bed Biofilm Reactor (MBBR) Integrated Fixed-Film Activated Sludge (IFAS) and ANITA Mox Deammonification

Palmer Wastewater Treatment Plant Environmental Impacts. A summary of the impacts of this treatment alternative are listed below:

We Know Water. AnoxKaldnes. Moving Bed Biofilm Reactor (MBBR) Integrated Fixed-Film Activated Sludge (IFAS) and ANITA Mox Deammonification

We Know Water. AnoxKaldnes. Moving Bed Biofilm Reactor (MBBR) Integrated Fixed-Film Activated Sludge (IFAS) and ANITA Mox Deammonification

COMPARISON STUDY BETWEEN INTEGRATED FIXED FILM ACTIVATED SLUDGE (IFAS), MEMBRANE BIOREACTOR (MBR) AND CONVENTIONAL ACTIVATED SLUDGE (AS) PROCESSES

Compact Waste Water Treatment MBR /MBBR Technology

No-Holds-Barred Match: RBC vs. MBR

Integrated Water & Wastewater Treatment Solutions Extending Nature s Capacity

AnoxKaldnes MBBR. Biological Treatment of Wastewater WATER TECHNOLOGIES

AnoxKaldnes. Moving Bed Biofilm Reactor (MBBR) and Integrated Fixed-Film Activated Sludge (IFAS)

Waste water treatment

Technology Options for Wastewater Treatment

BIO-BATCH TM. Sequencing Batch Reactor (SBR) Water & Wastewater Treatment

Bloomingdale WWTF Private/Public Partnership Works. Bob Wilcox, PE Fleis & VandenBrink May 10, 2016

COD Reduction by Moving Bed Biofilm Reactor

orld water works Clean Water and Energy from Wastewater IDEAL MBBR IDEAL IFAS

- 1 - Retrofitting IFAS Systems In Existing Activated Sludge Plants. by Glenn Thesing

AnoxKaldnes MBBR. Moving Bed Biofilm Reactor

Sludge recycling (optional) Figure Aerobic lagoon

MBBR Technology: - A cost effective solution for upgrading existing Waste water Treatment Works. Bruno Bigot

Coupling Trickling Filter or RBC s with Activated Sludge

Water Technologies. The AGAR Process: Make Your Plant Bigger Without Making it Bigger

Overview of Leachate Treatment Technologies -Pros, Cons, Costs, Concerns IVAN A. COOPER, P.E., B.C.E.E. CIVIL AND ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS, INC.

CLR Process. Vertical Loop Configuration

membrane bioreactors MBR vs. Conventional Activated Sludge Systems CAS

Contents General Information Abbreviations and Acronyms Chapter 1 Wastewater Treatment and the Development of Activated Sludge

Turbo4bio System For the Treatment of Sewage & Organic Effluents

Domestic Waste Water (Sewage): Collection, Treatment & Disposal

COMPARISON OF SBR AND CONTINUOUS FLOW ACTIVATED SLUDGE FOR NUTRIENT REMOVAL

CORPORATION THE EXPERIENCED LEADER IN SEQUENCING BATCH REACTOR TECHNOLOGY

by M k h GROVER Degremont

Donata Dubber 1, Laurence W. Gill 1 Corresponding Author Donata Dubber 1

Biofilm Reactor Technology and Design

Treatment Systems How they work and what to consider when selecting one. Joe Walsh IOWA Conference 2015

Packaged Wastewater Treatment Systems for Individual Homes and Small Communities. Mark Gross Orenco Systems, Inc. Sutherlin, OR USA.

ISAM INTEGRATED SURGE ANOXIC MIX

TWO YEARS OF BIOLOGICAL PHOSPHORUS REMOVAL WITH AN ADVANCED MSBR SYSTEM AT THE SHENZHEN YANTIAN WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT

Integrated Fixed Film Activated Sludge (IFAS) System for Additional Nitrification at the Coldwater WWTP

TWO YEAR CASE STUDY OF INTEGRATED FIXED FILM ACTIVATED SLUDGE (IFAS) AT BROOMFIELD, CO WWTP West 124th Street Broomfield, CO 80020

W O C H H O L Z R E G I O N A L W A T E R R E C L A M A T I O N F A C I L I T Y O V E R V I E W

Containerized Ultrafiltration (UF) Water Treatment Plant

Appendix D JWPCP Background and NDN

COLD WEATHER NITRIFICATION OF LAGOON EFFLUENT USING A MOVING BED BIOFILM REACTOR (MBBR) TREATMENT PROCESS

SECTION 9.0 SEWPCC SECOND PRIORITY CONTROL ALTERNATIVES

Aqua MSBR MODIFIED SEQUENCING BATCH REACTOR

Wet Weather and Advanced Treatment: Procurement Strategies to Secure the Right Technology

AquaNereda Aerobic Granular Sludge Technology

1/11/2016. Types and Characteristics of Microorganisms. Topic VI: Biological Treatment Processes. Learning Objectives:

DRAFT. Palmer Wastewater Treatment Plant Preliminary Engineering Report City of Palmer, Alaska

BIOLOGICAL NUTRIENT REMOVAL PROCESSES

Presentation Outline

MBBR Wastewater Treatment Processes

LABORATORY PROJECT: IMPACT OF VARIABLE LOADING ON A FIXED FILM REACTOR VERSUS A SUSPENDED GROWTH REACTOR

DEVELOPMENT OF THE. Ken Mikkelson, Ph.D. Ed Lang Lloyd Johnson, P.E. Aqua Aerobic Systems, Inc.

SBR FOR LOW FLOW APPLICATIONS

Case History: Anaerobic and Aerobic Treatment of Textile Wastes at South Carolina Textile Plants. Introduction

Review of WEFTEC 2016 Challenge & Overview of 2017 Event. Malcolm Fabiyi, PhD, MBA Spencer Snowling, PhD. P.Eng

40 years experience in fine bubble aeration. 20 years innovation in IFAS textile fixed bed technology

NITROGEN REMOVAL GRANT WEAVER, PE & WWTP OPERATOR PRESIDENT THE WATER PLANET COMPANY. Create Optimal Habitats

Biological Wastewater Treatment Processes II: MBBR Processes

Headworks International Inc.

Fixed-Film Processes

Best Practice in Sewage and Effluent Treatment Technologies

12.0 ASSESSMENT OF LEACHATE MANAGEMENT OPTIONS 12.1 Overview

UPGRADING FOR TOTAL NITROGEN REMOVAL WITH A POROUS MEDIA IFAS SYSTEM

CSR Process Simulations Can Help Municipalities Meet Stringent Nutrient Removal Requirements

Proprietary AquaTron technology incorporates three (3) innovative features that increase its efficiency and reduces cost:

INFILCO BIOLOGICAL FIXED FILM MBBR IFAS PROVEN

Chapter 4 Alternatives for Centralized and Satellite Wastewater Treatment Facilities and Sites

Nutrient Removal Optimization at the Fairview WWTP

GRANULAR ACTIVATED SLUDGE

At the Mercy of the Process Impacts of Nitrogen Removal Performance on WWTP Disinfection

Upgrade of an Oxidation Ditch Using Bio-Mass Carriers

Altoona Westerly Wastewater Treatment Facility BNR Conversion with Wet Weather Accommodation

BEING GOOD STEWARDS: IMPROVING EFFLUENT QUALITY ON A BARRIER ISLAND. 1.0 Executive Summary

CORPORATION THE EXPERIENCED LEADER IN SEQUENCING BATCH REACTOR TECHNOLOGY

International Journal of Advance Engineering and Research Development

MEMBRANE BIOREACTOR NIHAR DOCTOR. Director

Evaluation of Conventional Activated Sludge Compared to Membrane Bioreactors

Nutrient Removal Processes MARK GEHRING TECHNICAL SALES MGR., BIOLOGICAL TREATMENT

DISCUSSION PAPER. 1 Objective. 2 Design Flows and Loads. Capital Regional District Core Area Wastewater Management Program

WASTEWATER TREATMENT SYSTEM

Technology Options for Wastewater Treatment. April 24, 2012

OBG WASTE MANAGEMENT PRESENTS: 18 th Annual New England Pretreatment Coordinators Workshop (October 27, 2016) Landfill Leachate Overview Mark Greene,

AquaPASS. Aqua MixAir System. Phase Separator. System Features and Advantages. Anaerobic. Staged Aeration. Pre-Anoxic.

SEWAGE TREATMENT PLANT TECHNOLOGY BY COMPLETE WATER SOLUTION BHALERAO HEIGHTS, AKURDI, PUNE

Simultaneous Nutrient Removal: Quantification, Design, and Operation. Leon Downing, Ph.D., PE Donohue & Associates

Refinery Wastewater Process Modeling with GPS-X

operation of continuous and batch reactors. Contrary to what happens in the batch reactor, the substrate (BOD) of the wastewater in the continuous rea

RE ENGINEERING O&M PRACTICES TO GET NITROGEN & PHOSPHORUS REMOVAL WITHOUT FACILITY UPGRADES

Bioprocess Intelligent Operating System -Beyond Ammonia Control-

MEMBRANE AERATED BIOFILM REACTORS OXYGENATED FUN WITH LESS CARBON COST KELLY MARTIN AND SANDEEP SATHYAMOORTHY

FEASIBILITY REPORT OF 250 KLD SEWAGE TREATMENT PLANT

ADI MEMBRANE BIOREACTOR (MBR) AEROBIC WASTEWATER TREATMENT SOLUTION

CTB3365x Introduction to Water Treatment

AMPC Wastewater Management Fact Sheet Series Page 1

AMPC Wastewater Management Fact Sheet Series Page 1

SECTION 6.0 NEWPCC CENTRATE TREATMENT

Transcription:

Advantages & Applications of MBBR Technologies

Wastewater Technologies Attached Growth Suspended Growth Static Fixed film Trickling filters Rope media Web media Biological active filters (BAF) Dynamic Fixed Film Rotating biological contactors (RBC) Moving Bed Biofilm Reactors (MBBR) Plastic seaweed type media Activated sludge Continuous treatment Conventional Activated sludge MLE nutrient removal Barden pho process Membrane Bioreactors (MBR) Batch Treatment Sequencing batch reactors (SBR) Membrane Bioreactors (MBR) Integrated Fixed-Film Activated Sludge (IFAS)

General Overview of Plant s Components Raw Wastewater Influent PRELIMINARY Usually to Landfill A Preliminary Residuals (i.e., grit, rags, etc.) B Primary Sludge Clarifier PRIMARY Biological Treatment System SECONDAR Y (e.g., attached-growth Suspended-Growth, Constructed Wetland, etc.) Wastewater Treatment Residuals Clarifier Biosolids Processing and Disposal C Secondary Sludge TERTIARY Clean Wastewater Effluent Discharge to Receiving Waters

Fixed Film Technologies Trickling filters are a static, air phase fixed film treatment system. RBCs are partially water and air phase. MBBRs are dynamic, water phase fixed film treatment systems

MBBR = Moving Bed Biofilm Reactor Headworks Bio Inc s process is based on the biofilm principle using polyethylene carrier elements. The carrier elements, which are less dense than water,0.93-0.95 SG, provide a large protected surface for bacteria culture. MBBR provides advantages of Activated Sludge and Trickling Filter systems without their disadvantages. MBBR is one of the most documented processes with many technical publications and presentations.

Dynamic Water Phase Fixed Films No problems with odors, snails or red-worms as in air phase fixed films. Easier transfer of contaminants and oxygen to the biomass. Biofilm thickness is maintained and controlled by continuous sloughing created by the aeration-mixing process. NO attrition of media plants 20 years old are still using original media Stagnant Liquor

Biofilm Growth on Media Mixing energy controls the biological thickness BOD Nitrifiers

* More Than Just Plastic 15+ Years of R&D Successfu l Installatio ns Customiza ble Solutions Virgin HDPE Superior Media Compositi on Process Design Experts

Customizable Processes

What s the Difference? IFAS Integrated Fixed Film Activated Sludge Includes Return Activated Sludge (RAS) Fixed film & Suspended growth MBBR Moving Bed Biofilm Reactor No RAS - Once through process Fixed film Only Return Activated Sludge Waste Activated Sludge Waste Sludge

Why MBBR? Self regulating biomass. Flexible Design that allows for increased capacity. No operational adjustments, only equipment maintenance. Stable under large load variations. Smaller foot prints. Low investment Cost. Single pass treatment. Multiple applications. Extremely compact and simple biological treatment system.

Key MBBR Design Parameters Organic surface loading rate (g BOD/m2d) Normal rate : 10 13 g BOD 5 /m 2 d @25 o C Protected surface area of carrier (m2/m3) 400 680 m 2 /m 3 for Headworks ActiveCell Media The Biomedia carrier filling fraction (%) Normally : 50 67 % (minimum 30%) Temperature k T = 1,07(T-10) (when T = 5 10 oc) k T = 1,06(T-10) (when T = 10-20 oc)

Key Components: MBBR Retention Sieves Aeration Grid Activecell Media 1% = Equipment Supply / 99% = Knowledge

Applications Features: Single pass treatment BOD/COD Reduction No operational adjustments Only equipment maintenance Self regulating biomass Nitrification Small foot print Multiple applications Denitrification

BOD / COD Removal High loads Up to 6000 mg/l Small foot print Single pass treatment No recycle No operator adjustments Biology self regulating Low BOD effluent 50% to 80 % reduction in 30 minutes < 10 mg/l BOD (after clarification)

D D D D D D IFAS Applications (works best at temperatures < 25 C) Existing Plant BOD & TSS = 30 mg/l Nitrification Only Pre & Post DN NH 3 -N < 1 mg/l Pre-DN & Nitrification NH 3 -N < 1 mg/l & TN >8 mg/l Inf. NH 3 -N < 1 mg/l & TN < 3 mg/l Internal Recycle COD Clarification Eff. Pre- D-nitrification BOD Reduction Return Sludge Nitrification Post D-nitrification Waste Sludge

Biological Phosphorous Removal Decreases tank volume required for BOD/COD and Nitrification allowing room for Bio-P and De-nitrification. Allows for the suspended growth sludge age to be tailored for maximum phosphorus removal. Nitrification biology grows on media and is not affected by low sludge ages of suspended growth. D D

Footprint Comparison Tricking Filter vs. MBBR EXISTING TRICKLING FILTERS 99 m 2 /m 3 VOL = 3990 m 3 MBBR 548 m2/m3 VOL = 720 m3 AT EQUAL LEVELS OF BOD REMOVAL: MBBR Provides Five times the Biofilm Surface Area in less than ¼ Reactor Volume as Trickling Filter Kinetics = MBBR is More Active & Efficient than Trickling Filter

Footprint comparison 4000 3500 3000 Foot print, m 2 2500 2000 1500 1000 500 0 MBBR+DAF MBBR + CLARIFIER ASP + CLARIFIER

RBC vs MBBR Example Plant with 5000 m3/d design flow: Influent: BOD: 600mg/l, COD: 1000 mg/l, TSS 600 mg/l Effluent: BOD: 50 mg/l, COD: 80 mg/l, TSS 60 mg/l RBC requires 800 m2 area and 93 kw for disk drives MBBR requires 195 m2 area and 93 kw for air blowers. The power on the MBBR can be varied based on the influent load where the RBC cannot.

MBBR Areas of Focus INDUSTRIAL MARINE MUNICIPAL

MBBR Size vs. Activated Sludge Activated Sludge Extended Air process is designed for 12 to 24 hours hydraulic retention time (HRT). The MBBR need only 2 to 3 HRT to achieve the same level of nitrification. This is less than or equal to ¼ the tank volume. Typical biomass levels in activated sludge plants is between 2500 mg/l to 3500 mg/l of suspended solids. Typical equivalent biomass in an MBBR is 6000 mg/l of attach growth. This is 2 times more available treatment mass. Al Balad, Jeddah

Tertiary Treatment (Sandfilter) DAF (Clarifier) Screen 40m Diameter, 9m high 40 000m3/d

Carousel Upgrade (Typical Saudi Arabian Wastewater Plant) SURFACE AERATORS EFFLUENT Current Design Option 1 Option 2 Option 3 *BOD / TSS / NH 3 Capacity: 25,000 m 3 /d Effluent Quality:? Capacity Increases to 45,000 m 3 /d Effluent Quality: 10/10/3* Capacity Increases to 90,000 m 3 /d Effluent Quality: 10/10/3* Capacity Increases to 45,000 m 3 /d Effluent Quality: 10/10/3* NITRIFYING REACTOR EXISTING SURFACE AERATORS EXISTING RAS BOD REACTOR NEW BAFFLE WALL RETENTION SCREENS NEW SECTION OF WALL NEW EFFLUENT NEW WALL WITH RETENTION SCREENS NITRIFYING REACTOR RETENTION SCREENS BOD REACTOR RECYCLED FLOW EXISTING EFFLUENT EXISTING EFFLUENT BOD REACTOR AERATION GRIDS NEW WALL EXISTING INFLUENT NEW RETENTION SCREEN AERATION GRIDS NEW INFLUENT AERATION GRIDS NEW INFLUENT EXISTING INFLUENT NEW ROUGHING REACTOR NEW WALL WITH RETENTION SCREENS

RETENTION SCREENS NITRIFYING REACTOR EXISTING EFFLUENT NEW RETENTION SCREEN AERATION GRIDS EXISTING SURFACE AERATORS EXISTING EFFLUENT NEW WALL NEW INFLUENT NEW ROUGHING REACTOR BOD REACTOR NEW SECTION OF WALL EXISTING RAS NEW WALL WITH RETENTION SCREENS Option 1 NEW INFLUENT BOD REACTOR AERATION GRIDS Option 3 NEW WALL WITH RETENTION SCREENS NEW EFFLUENT RETENTION SCREENS Options for Upgrading Carousel System AERATION GRIDS EXISTING INFLUENT 1 2 3 Increase in Treatment Capacity 2X 4X 2X NITRIFYING REACTOR NEW BAFFLE WALL BOD REACTOR % Media Fill 30% 60% 40% Number of Internal Walls Removed 2 3 None Number of New Internal Walls 1 Short 1 3 Short Option 2 New Influent Location No Yes No New Effluent Location No Yes No % Retrofit Existing Tank with Diffused Aeration System 100% 100% 25% Remove Existing Surface Aerators Yes Yes No

Capacity Increase Flow increase of 4 x 250 m 3 /d up to 4 x 1000 m 3 /d

Phased increase in capacity Existing plant capacity can be increased by adding more media into the MBBR Tank Existing MBBR After 50% fill 70% fill Flow = 1000 m3/d BOD Load = 300 kg/d Fill fraction = 50 % Flow = 1400 m3/d BOD Load = 420 kg/d Fill fraction = 70 %

Moorhead, MN: 22,750 m 3 /day

Agnico Eagle LeRonde Mine: Cadillac, Quebec

Jamaica: 8,000 m 3 /day

Finland: 18,500 m 3 /day

Marine Installations CleanSea Shipboard Wastewater Treatment RCCL Vision of the Seas Celebrity Millennium Celebrity Summit RCCL Enchantment of the Seas RCCL Jewel of the Seas RCCL Radiance of the Seas Celebrity Constellation RCCL Brilliance of the Seas RCCL Project Genesis

Onboard the Largest Cruise Ship in the World

Extensive Installation List Installations including municipal in the following industries: Domestic/Resort Food Processing Landfill Leachate Marine Meat Processing Mining Petrochemical Pharmaceuticals Power Plant Pulp & Paper Septage Processing Vehicle Wash

HIT System Headworks Integrated Treatment System Single Train with DAF DN-BOD-Nitrification, 500 650 m3/d, at 25 C

HIT System Headworks Integrated Treatment System Flow: (60 m3/day) Influent: 300/300/40 Effluent: 10/10/2

Comparison: MBR vs MBBR MBR Plant MBBR Plant Capital Investment High Low Footprint Low Low Flow Tolerance Low High Aeration Blowers Required Required Recirculation Pumps Required Not Required Air Scouring Blowers Required Not Required Screening Requirements High Low Chemical Usage High N/A Operational Difficulty High Low

Comparison: 800 m 3 /day MBBR RBC Activated Sludge SBR No residual suspended solids No residual suspended solids Requires residual suspended solids (MLSS) Requires residual suspended solids (MLSS) Self regulating, no operator adjustments Self regulating, no operator adjustments Operator adjusts MLSS levels Operator adjusts MLSS levels Single pass flow through Single pass flow through MLSS sludge recycled back through plant May or may not require MLSS recycle 1 hour retention time (based on 800m3/d) 8.25 m2 treatment area 4 hours retention time 4 hours retention time 64 m2 treatment area 33.75 m2 treatment area 5 hours retention time (includes clarification) 31.5 m2 treatment area (includes clarification) Not affected by high flows Biology stripped of media with high flows MLSS can be flushed out with high flows Rarely affected by high flows Low mechanical equipment High mechanical equipment Moderate mechanical equipment Low mechanical equipment Stable nutrient removal Unstable nutrient removal Unstable nutrient removal Stable nutrient removal

Which Activecell media has the larger protected surface area????

Questions? International Headquarters 800 Wilcrest Dr, Suite 340 Houston, TX 77042 hwbio@headworksusa. www.headworksbio.com