The Hunnicutt Creek Restoration Project

Similar documents
Hydrilla : A Brief Overview

Species Dataform and Scoresheet for Hedera helix L (English ivy) Dataform and Scoresheet

An Ecological Approach to Submersed Aquatic Plant Management

Ecological Approaches for Weed Management or How Not to Reinvent the Wheel. Jodie S. Holt University of California Riverside

Restoring Hunnicutt Creek

What are cultural methods? Cultural methods part 1. Grazing. Disadvantages. Multi-species grazing. Controlled access and use

2018 Arkansas State Wildlife Grant Pre-proposal

California Tahoe Conservancy Monitoring Plan

Triadica sebifera -- Georgia

Notes on Some Characteristics of Lopsided Indiangrass (Sorghastrum secundum)

Pat L. Shaver USDA-NRCS-WNTSC Portland, OR

Habitat Restoration, Longleaf Pine Forests, and the Flatwoods Salamander. Goals of Today s Talk. Habitat Restoration. Habitat Restoration

Presented to the Santa Cruz NRCD, Babacomari Cattle Ranch, Elgin, AZ May

Effective Landscape Scale Management of Cirsium arvense (Canada Thistle) Utilizing Biological Control

Hydrologic response to conifer removal and upslope harvest in a montane meadow

Project Title: Restoration of Tallgrass and Wetland Prairie Habitat in Northwest Arkansas

Don t Mow. Let it Grow!

1Bjorge et al. The Effects of Fire on Scotch Broom. Star Bjorge, Renée Davis, Peter Howard, Megann Schmitt*

Project Title: Tall Grass Prairie Restoration Stewardship and Monitoring for Grassland Bird Habitat

Fire Ecology and Conservation Mary Jane Epps

Natural and Engineered Wetlands for Stormwater Management

COSSARO Candidate Species at Risk Evaluation Form. for. Pitcher s Thistle (Cirsium pitcheri)

Chapter 8: Introduction to Biological Control of Aquatic Weeds

Anne Hairston-Strang MD DNR Forest Service September 7, 2017

Mitchell C. Lettow. 578 Wilson Rd, Room 204, East Lansing, MI (269)

Outline. Introduction. Tennessee's Silent Invader Chinese Tallow Tree Triaca sebifera (L.) Small 8/25/14. Introduction. Current Knowledge/Issues

Research Projects. General List of Contents. 3.1 List of Priority Research Areas 3.2 Projects Lists 3.3 Project Reports

EMERALD ASH BORER IN SOUTH CAROLINA

Use of fire to control weeds. Shane Campbell, Tropical Weeds Research Centre, DEEDI, Charters Towers

Vernicia fordii -- Georgia

Case Histories. Natural landscapes modified by grazing. Competition between native and exotics often limits restoration success.

Silvicultural practices in the restoration of degraded ecosystems

Strategy for Control of Hydrilla in Deep Creek Lake. Image or Graphic. DCL Policy Review Board Meeting 3/20/2014

Lauren S. Pile1 & G. Geoff Wang2. Clemson University. 1PhD Candidate. 2Professor of Silviculture and Forest Ecology

LESSON TEN: What Is an Ecological Site and What Causes Plant Community Change?

NRCS Programs and Practices for Riparian Areas in Hawaii

Emerging Restoration Approaches for Disturbed Mojave Desert Shrublands and the Search for Suitable Native Plant Materials

Highway Rights-of-Way as Longleaf Pine Restoration Habitat

Cover it up! Using plants to control buckthorn

J O I N T P U B L I C N O T I C E

Species Dataform and Scoresheet for Miscanthus sinensis Anderson (Chinese silvergrass) Species Dataform and Scoresheet

Kittitas County Voluntary Stewardship Plan

Appendix E: A Manager s Definition of Aquatic Plant Control

Rachel Frost, Jeff Mosley, Tracy Mosley, and Brent Roeder

Rangeland CEAP Literature Synthesis: Conclusions and Recommendations

Native Seed Production Manual Amy Bartow Corvallis Plant Material Center

Emerald Ash Borer: Background & Overview of the Green Menace NATHAN W. SIEGERT, PH.D. FOREST ENTOMOLOGIST

Resource Conservation Opportunities and Management Guidelines

Writing Performance Standards for Wetland Mitigation

Evaluating the Potential Invasiveness of Eucalyptus in Florida. Kim Lorentz and Pat Minogue May 22, 2013

Monitoring the Effects of Emerald Ash Borer in the Philadelphia Urban Forest

Longleaf Pine Cone Prospects

Biological Control and Vegetation Management

USDA Agricultural Research Service National Program Overview of Biocontrol of Weeds

MANAGING FOR BOBWHITE QUAIL IN THE SOUTHEAST LOUISIANA AGRICULTURAL CONSULTANTS FEBRUARY 9, 2007

Wolf Lake Watershed Study Recommendations Follow-up

Chapter 5: Water Quality Buffer Requirements

INVASIVE PLANT CONTROL AMERICAN RECOVERY & REINVESTMENT ACT

File Code: 1900 Date: June 14, Dear Interested Parties,

Blue Ash Ontario Government Response Statement

Common Name: SANDHILL ROSEMARY. Scientific Name: Ceratiola ericoides Michaux. Other Commonly Used Names: Florida rosemary, sand heath

Overview of America s Longleaf Restoration Initiative and the Longleaf Partnership Council

Canada Thistle: An Invasive Alien Plant in our Neck of the Woods

Control of Eurasian Water Milfoil & Large-scale Aquatic Herbicide Use Updated July 2006 Prepared by WDNR Lakes and Aquatic Plant Management Staff

Annual Report of Activities Conducted under the Cooperative Aquatic Plant Control Program in Florida Public Waters for Fiscal Year

Ecology & Management of Cheatgrass

Lecture 3.4: Fire effects on vegetation

An Integrated Approach to Invasive Species Control: Drury Wetland. Kara DeGraff

MANITOBA ENVIROTHON WATER AND AQUATIC ECOSYSTEMS

HEATHER. Tongariro National Park World Heritage Area, North Island, New Zealand.

Fire ecology of ponderosa pine

Forest Groundcover Restoration 1

Mapping and Prioritization:

Rangeland Conservation Effects Assessment Program (CEAP)

LIVING LANDS Helping Land Trusts Conserve Biodiversity

Defining tipping points in seedling survival and growth with competition thresholds. Andrew S. Nelson University of Idaho

COSSARO Candidate Species at Risk Evaluation Form. for. White Prairie Gentian (Gentiana alba) Assessed by COSSARO as Endangered February 2011.

Making Pasture Weed Control Decisions

Fontana Project Scoping Record August 2013

Re: Initial Comments on the Mount Laguna and Pine Valley Community Defense and Healthy Forest Restoration Project

Plantation Forestry: A Global Look

Grazing and the Management of Conservation Rangelands

Hydrilla Verticillata

The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill s. Battle Grove Regenerative Stormwater Conveyance

Clemson s Native Tree Educational Arboretum

Riparian Buffers for Water Resource Protection

Community Benefits of Land Restoration

Mayflower Lake Management Planning Committee UWSP Center for Watershed Science and Education Marathon County Wisconsin Department of Natural

MONITORING CHANGES IN EXOTIC VEGETATION

Intensively Managed Pine Plantations

Feasibility Report with Integrated Environmental Assessment Rip Rap Landing HREP APPENDIX M MONITORING & ADAPTIVE MANAGEMENT PLAN

The Southern Sierra Hardwood Range region, consisting of Madera, Fresno,

Ecological Considerations in Setting MFLs and Lake Regulation Targets for the Ocklawaha Chain of Lakes

Kerr Lake Vegetation Survey. October November Report submitted by NC State University. Background

Section Objectives: Explain biodiversity and its importance. Relate various threats to the loss of biodiversity.

Hydrilla (Hydrilla verticillata) Monitoring in. Nearby Waters of the Hudson River. Restoring Balance. Enhancing Beauty.

2017 Data Report for Hoags Lake, Mason County

2018 Data Report for. Crystal Lake, Montcalm County

Restoring the Balance

File Code: 1950 Date: December 7, Dear Friend of the Forest:

Transcription:

Southeast Exotic Pest Plant Council and NC Invasive Plant Council Joint Annual Meeting and Symposium May 26-28, 2015 North Carolina Botanical Garden Chapel Hill, NC Poster Abstracts The Hunnicutt Creek Restoration Project Gary Douglas Pence Senior, Wildlife and Fisheries Biology Clemson University 13 Renewal Road, Pendleton, SC 29670 (803)-719-6090 gpence@g.clemson.edu Stephannie Ardith Allen Senior, Wildlife and Fisheries Biology Clemson University 2408 Betty Street, Orlando, FL 32803 9407)-361-9432 sallen2@g.clemson.edu The Hunnicutt Creek Restoration Project is an ongoing effort started in 2013 with the goal of re-establishing the natural functions and conditions of a degraded watershed located on Clemson University s campus. Monitoring and removal of invasive species, primarily chinese privet, silverthorn, and nandina, within the upper reaches of the watershed is one of the primary goals and the first step towards restoring a natural and more aesthetically pleasing system. We established thirty 5x5 meter plots, using the Carolina Vegetative Survey protocol, to measure the effectiveness of various removal techniques. We used four treatment methods to remove invasive species: chemical, mechanical, mechanical and chemical, and prescribed grazing. A variety of herbicides were used based on plant size for the chemical treatments. Mechanical removal techniques varied based on stem size. Mechanical and chemical treatments combined both techniques by removing plants and then applying herbicides to cut stems. Prescribed grazing consisted of 40 goats contained in an area for 40 days. Five plots were randomly assigned to each of these treatments in addition to five control plots. Additionally, five plots were selected as reference sites to establish a target long-term restoration goal and for comparison with treatment plots. Preliminary results indicate that the chemical and mechanical treatment is the most effective at reducing cover and stem count of invasive species. The goats were effective in opening up the landscape but were not selective in their grazing. In addition to continued monitoring, we are increasing our removal efforts with a volunteer force using the 1 of 5

mechanical and chemical treatment. Further restoration efforts are being made with the propagation of desired native species for eventual introduction into watershed. Non-Target Impacts: Non-native weevil biocontols and Pitcher s thistle (Cirsium pitcheri) a rare, Great Lakes native Julie E. Marik, M.S. Research Specialist Department of Biology East Carolina University Greenville, North Carolina 27858 (252)328.1832 marikj@ecu.edu Claudia L. Jolls, Ph.D. Assistant Chair and Associate Professor Department of Biology East Carolina University Greenville, North Carolina 27858 (252)328.6295 jollsc@ecu.edu Easy and effective control of invasive plants is a pressing need worldwide. The introduction of animal biocontrol agents is used to target and control invasive plant populations. Standards guiding the release of biocontrols have improved in recent decades; however, the negative effects of biocontrol agents on non-target species, particularly rare taxa, are often unknown and/or understudied. Pitcher s thistle (Cirsium pitcheri) is a native of the sand dunes and cobble shorelines of the Great Lakes and is federally listed as threatened. Threats include human disturbance, habitat loss, and competition from non-native plant invasives. Long-term demographic work on several populations show most are already in a slow decline. In the United States, non-native weevil biocontols, Rhinocyllus conicus and Larinus planus, were used to control invasive Eurasian thistles, musk thistle (Carduus nutans) and Canada thistle (Cirsium arvense). Adults oviposit into flowering heads and larvae feed on seed and floral tissues. R. conicus was found on C. pitcheri heads at the Chicago Botanic Garden in 2007. L. planus was found on C. pitcheri heads at Whitefish Dunes State Park (Door County, WI) in 2011. Estimated reduction of seed set due to weevil larval herbivory is 50-95%. Using existing demographic data for two populations of Cirsium pitcheri we modeled the effects of a 50% reduction in seed set due to weevil herbivory. Weevil herbivory reduced long-term growth rates by 11-12%. Population viability estimates show a reduction in viability for both populations with the 5% risk of extinction threshold for the two populations exceeded in 5 and 13 years with weevil herbivory versus 8 and 24 years without herbivory. 2 of 5

Invasibility of a longleaf pine fire-managed landscape by non-native, woody plant species Michael G. Just, PhD Candidate Department of Plant and Microbial Biology, North Carolina State University 2115 Gardner Hall, Raleigh, NC 27695 615-266-6269 mjust@ncsu.edu Matthew G. Hohmann, Ecologist US Army Corps of Engineers, Engineer Research and Development Center P.O. Box 9005, Champaign, IL 61826 217-352-6511 Matthew.G.Hohmann@usace.army.mil William A. Hoffmann Associate Professor Department of Plant and Microbial Biology, North Carolina State University 2115 Gardner Hall, Campus Box 7612, Raleigh, NC 27695 919-513-7668 William_Hoffmann@ncsu.edu Periodic disturbance is a phenomenon that provides opportunities (e.g. resources, niche space) in the landscape for plant recruitment. In pyrogenic ecosystems seedling establishment and survival is both directly and indirectly influenced by periodic fire disturbance. However, these opportunities can be exploited by native and non-native species alike. Although fire disturbance may benefit plant recruitment by reducing tree cover, removing litter, and releasing nutrients, fire may also kill seedlings. Our objective was to quantify the impact of fire and microsite conditions on the germination, survival, and growth of six non-native, woody species (Elaeagnus umbellata, Ligustrum sinense, Melia azedarach, Nandina domestica, Pyrus calleryana, and Triadica sebifera) in a longleaf pine ecosystem. These species are considered invasive in the southeastern USA, and are present adjacent to our study landscape. We established 18 study sites along longleaf pine savanna wetland ecotonal gradients in the NC Sandhills at Ft. Bragg Military Reservation. Each site had paired savanna ecotone plots, and each plot contained 18 subplots (six species x three treatments [no treatment, litter removed, litter removed and seed buried]). Prescribed burns were applied to our sites one, two, or three years after seed arrival. We measured germination, survival, and growth for all individuals for three growing seasons. For each plot we measured soil moisture and nutrients, canopy cover, and fire history. Four of six species germinated, and recruitment was lowest in the most natural, untreated subplots. Three species survived into the second growing season, but only P. calleryana was able to survive fire as seedlings. Survival of P. calleryana in unburned plots between the beginning of growing season 2 and 3 was 100%, whereas survival in burned plots was 3 of 5

approximately 39%. Current prescribed fire practices at Ft. Bragg largely appear to filter these species from the landscape due to their incongruence with the disturbance regime. Assessing the Geographic Potential of Invasive Plants Leslie P. Newton (Entomologist) Plant Epidemiology and Risk Analysis Laboratory, Plant Protection and Quarantine, United States Department of Agriculture, 1730 Varsity Drive, Suite 300; Raleigh, NC, USA 27606, 919-855- 7533; leslie.p.newton@aphis.usda.gov Steve Hong, NSF Center for Integrated Pest Management, North Carolina State University and Cooperator with USDA APHIS PPQ CPHST PERAL, 1730 Varsity Drive, Suite 300, Raleigh, NC 27606, 919-515-76497; shong8@ncsu.edu Anthony L. Koop (Plant Ecologist): Same address as primary author. 919-855- 7429; anthony.l.koop@aphis.usda.gov Roger D. Magarey, Senior Researcher, NSF Center for Integrated Pest Management, North Carolina State University, 1730 Varsity Drive, Suite 110, Raleigh, NC 27606, 919-515-3207; rdmagare@ncsu.edu Assessing geographic potential is an important component of any weed risk assessment, because climatological factors affect a species ability to establish in any given area. USDA Plant Protection and Quarantine has developed a simple raster-based overlay model in ArcGIS to predict the potential distribution of weeds and invasive plants. Our weed risk assessment group uses three global datasets representing plant hardiness zones, mean annual precipitation, and Köppen-Geiger climate classes to identify the areas of the United States that have a suitable climate for a species. In the PPQ WRA process, we first map the global distribution of the species and then relate it to the particular levels of each of the three climate variables. These maps are then overlaid to determine the range of combinations of climate variables that are suitable for the species in the United States. We validated our model (Proto3) and also compared it with two other predictive models (MaxEnt and CLIMEX [match climate]). Ten species were analyzed under both non-blind conditions (the user was aware of the species) and blind conditions (the user was unaware of the species). Across all species, our Proto3 model predicted larger proportions of the U.S. as suitable, whereas MaxEnt predicted smaller portions as suitable. It is impossible to determine whether Proto3 is overpredicting, because some of the species may not have reached their final distribution. Overall, under both test types, we found much more variation in model performance among the weed species than among the model themselves. 4 of 5

Differences in sprouting rates and frequencies between monoecious hydrilla turions and tubers at six different temperatures Shannon Auell Graduate Research Assistant North Carolina State University 4401 F Williams Hall (814) 573-1113 smauell@ncsu.edu Steve Hoyle Research Specialist NC State University Crop Science Department Campus Box 7620 919 495 0899 steve_hoyle@ncsu.edu Robert J. Richardson Associate Professor and Extension Specialist Aquatic and Noncropland Weed Science Crop Science Department, NC State University Box 7620, Williams Hall (919) 515-5653 rob_richardson@ncsu.edu Hydrilla (Hydrilla verticillata) is a submersed macrophyte often called the perfect aquatic weed (Langeland, 1996) and is one of the most expensive and difficult to control aquatic weeds in the US. Monoecious hydrilla, the prominent biotype of North Carolina, is an herbaceous perennial (Nawrocki, 2011). Regrowth is dependent upon sprouting of subterranean and axillary turions (Harlan et al., 1985). This study aims to determine differences in sprouting rates and frequencies between monoecious hydrilla turions and tubers at six different temperatures. Studies were conducted on a temperature gradient table at NCSU. Turions and tubers were floated in jars held at six different temperatures ( T1 = 41.0 C, T2 = 34.9 C, T3 = 29.3 C, T4 = 24.0 C, T5 = 17.6 C, and T6 = 12.3 C). Sprouting frequency and shoot length were measured every other day for twelve days. Neither turions nor tubers sprouted at the most extreme temperatures, and turions generally sprouted faster than tubers. Both turion and tuber sprouting differed by temperature with optimum turion sprouting at 29.3 and 34.9 C and optimum tuber sprouting at 29.3 and 24.0 C. Results from this study will be useful when considering management programs across latitudes or elevations. 5 of 5