European Medicines Agency Perspective

Similar documents
Fergus Sweeney, European Medicines Agency

EU Regulatory Perspective

WMA Declaration of Helsinki Ethical Principles f or Medical Research Involving Human Subjects

INSPECTION OF INDEPENDENT ETHICS COMMITTEES (IEC) The Italian Experience

Review of EU Clinical Trial Directive. 15 May 2012 Mike Beckers Sidley Austin LLP, Brussels

Regulatory Requirements

Considerations on regulatory aspects

How are medicines evaluated at the EMA

WMA Declaration of Helsinki - Ethical

-Regulation (EC) No.1394/2007 -Regulation (EC) No. 668/2009

OVERVIEW OF DIRECTIVE 2001/20. Paul Derbyshire. Background & History. Aims of Directive 2001/20

EudraCT database and EU Clinical Trials Register (EU-CTR)

Revision of Helsinki Declaration

Draft Agreed by EMA Working Group on Third Country Clinical Trials 23 March End of consultation (deadline for comments) 30 September 2010

Issues identified by stakeholders: follow-up from EMA s ATMP workshop

Highlights of the proposed Clinical Trials Regulation in Europe

Track III: International Clinical Trials: Global Compliance Norms and EU Focus

Chapter 28 Pharmaceutical acquis (human and veterinary medicinal products)

The new EU clinical trial regulation 536/2014 : Low interventional trials

June 14, To the World Medical Association Secretariat:

The compassionate use of medicinal products. An example: the French ATU system. 0ff label use in France

Clinical Trials application process, legislation & guidelines

Clinical Trials Environment EU Legislation: Ausblick auf die neue Gesetzgebung für klinische Prüfungen

REVISION OF THE CLINICAL TRIALS DIRECTIVE 2001/20/EC UK RESPONSE TO CONCEPT PAPER

Ethics and Clinical trials EU approach

Pharmabiotics: a Regulatory Hurdle in Europe

Explanatory note on general fees payable to the European Medicines Agency

Public Consultation Paper: Assessment of the Functioning of the Clinical Trials Directive 2001/20/EC

Good Manufacturing Practice for ATMPs Rocio Salvador Roldan DG SANTE, Unit B5

Agenzia Italiana del Farmaco

VERSION: 21 st June Date of Publication: 15 th March C/ CAMPEZO, 1 EDIFICIO MADRID Tel.: Fax:

Explanatory note on general fees payable to the European Medicines Agency

A. TRIAL IDENTIFICATION

Legislative Framework and Scientific Guidance in European Assessment

EUROPEAN COMMISSION HEALTH AND CONSUMERS DIRECTORATE-GENERAL

Good Clinical Practice (GCP): how does a laboratory that supports a clinical trial ensure compliance with these Regulations

How CAT Works: Regulatory Process, Patient Contribution and Outcomes

GCP Basics - refresher

NIS Considerations - Bulgaria

29 August Dear Sir/Madam:

Ethics in CTs. The Role of the Regulator versus The Role of the REB

RSC/CT Det. no. 1/2013

Scientific Advisory Groups (SAG)

Supervision of manufacturers: What is expected of National Competent Authorities?

Marketing Authorisation Routes in the EU

Good Clinical Practice (GCP) & Clinical Trial Registries

COMMITTEE FOR MEDICINAL PRODUCTS FOR VETERINARY USE (CVMP)

Comment by the Federal Institute for Drugs and Medical Devices in coordination with the Paul Ehrlich Institute and the Federal Ministry of Health

Due diligence in the European medical devices industry

Regulatory Framework for Medical Device

EUROPEAN COMMISSION HEALTH AND CONSUMERS DIRECTORATE-GENERAL INVESTIGATIONAL MEDICINAL PRODUCTS' (NIMPS) (REV. 1, MARCH 2011)

Challenges of Multicenter Studies in Europe, EURECNET, Bratislava, 13 April 2012

World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki

CMD(h) GUIDANCE FOR MAHs ON THE PHARMACOVIGILANCE SYSTEM AND RISK MANAGEMENT PLAN IN THE MUTUAL RECOGNITION & DECENTRALISED PROCEDURES

ICH GCP Revision and EU Clinical Trial Regulation

Explanatory note on fees payable to the European Medicines Agency

EU Update on Regulatory Developments

EMA Comments on Implementing Measures for Pharmacovigilance (PCIM/11/01)

Veterinary Medicines Legislation and Maximum Residue Limits in the EU

Safety Measures in the new Pharmacovigilance System

Clinical trials from CRA s point of view

Brexit Guidance for Stakeholders Human and veterinary medicines

EUROPEAN COMMISSION HEALTH AND FOOD SAFETY DIRECTORATE-GENERAL

BEUC POSITION ON THE EUROPEAN MEDICINES AGENCY ROAD MAP TO 2015

Format and content of electronic periodic safety update reports (Technical contribution to EC implementing measure)

GxP Inspections within the Centralised Procedure

Clinical Development and enabling Regulatory Steps: How to obtain ODD and Scientific Advice at EMA

Comments from: 1. General comments

ORPHAN DESIGNATION BY THE EMA. Paillard Juliette M2 AREIPS 15/11/2016

Adoption by CHMP for release for 3-month public consultation 18 November End of consultation (deadline for comments) 28 February 2011

WRITTEN SUBMISSION ON THE OPERATION OF THE CLINICAL TRIALS DIRECTIVE (DIRECTIVE 2001/20/EC) AND PERSPECTIVES FOR THE FUTURE

EU health policy. Strategy for the pharmaceutical industry and biosimilars. Salvatore D'Acunto. DG Research. DG Internal Market. DG Health & Consumers

Advanced-therapy medicinal products: new competencies in hospital pharmacy Seminar PH4. Relevant Financial Relationships - None

International Supply Chain: How are we handling globalisation? GCP oversight

COMMENTS FROM EUROPABIO GENERAL COMMENTS

Interface between medicinal product and medical devices development - Update on EMA implementation of the new medical devices legislation

The role of patients at the EMA

Questions And Answers To Support The

1201 Maryland Avenue SW, Suite 900, Washington, DC ,

Five years as EMA Liaison at US FDA

Compliance mechanisms available in Russia to ensure adherence to ethical guidelines

PCWP and HCPWP work programmes for 2013

Office for support of INNOVATION and KNOWLEDGE of medicinal products. _ Spanish Agency of Medicines and Medical Devices

EU Clinical Trial Regulation A view from the Industry

New Pharmacovigilance legislation. Post-authorisation safety studies. ENCePP Plenary meeting. 3 May 2012

ICH Topic E15 Definitions for genomic biomarkers, pharmacogenomics, pharmacogenetics, genomic data and sample coding categories.

Biomarker Regulation. Regulator s perspective. Jan Müller-Berghaus

Date: 21 st May 2014 Version: 5 Page 1 of 11. Principal Author Name D. Skelhorn Signature: D. Skelhorn Date: 22 nd May 2014

PROCEDURE FOR CONDUCTING PHARMACOVIGILANCE INSPECTIONS REQUESTED BY THE CVMP. Ad Hoc PhV Inspectors Working Group

GUIDELINES ON MEDICAL DEVICES GUIDE FOR COMPETENT AUTHORITIES IN MAKING AN ASSESSMENT OF CLINICAL INVESTIGATION NOTIFICATION

Preparing for the withdrawal is therefore not just a matter for EU and national authorities, but also for private parties.

EUROPEAN COMMISSION HEALTH AND CONSUMERS DIRECTORATE-GENERAL

REQUEST FOR AUTHORISATION TO THE COMPETENT AUTHORITY: REQUEST FOR OPINION OF THE ETHICS COMMITTEE:

Clinical trial applications in the EU and US

Comments of the University-based Network of Coordinating Centers for Clinical Trials

Strengthening ethics review systems

13 May 2010 BY . Subject: Comments on the Concept Paper on the Revision of the Clinical Trials Directive 2001/20/EC

Interested parties (organisations or individuals) that commented on the draft document as released for consultation.

The European Network of Centres of Pharmacoepidemiology & Pharmacovigilance (ENCePP)

Personalised medicine towards the market and patients: the approval process

Transcription:

European Medicines Agency Perspective WMA Workshop on revision of DoH, 4-6 Dec 2012, Capetown, South Africa. Presented by: Fergus Sweeney, PhD Head of Sector, Compliance and Inspection, European Medicines Agency. An agency of the European Union

Disclaimer The views presented in this presentation/these slides are those of the author and should not be understood or quoted as being made on behalf of the European Medicines Agency and/or its scientific committees 2

EU requirements for clinical trials conducted in support of marketing authorisation submitted to the EU This presentation and the documents referred to relate to the conduct of trials required to support MAA in EU Requirements apply: 3 To all clinical trials that are included in a MAA submitted in the EU/EEA regardless of the route (Centralised, Mutual Recognition, Decentralised) regardless of the EU or third country involved (legislation does not differentiate developed, developing etc) Apply to the clinical trials included in a MAA There is no specific legal framework for review of a clinical trial dossier by an EU regulator before the conduct of the trial in a third country

The Dilemna Between 2005 and 2011 897,891 Patients in pivotal trials (38.11% in Europe, 34.05% in North America, 2.58% Africa, 9.36% Middle East/Asia Pacific, 4.44% CIS, 9.36 % Latin America, 2.1% other) 70,291 clinical trial sites in c. 106countries c. 485 new MAA applications plus line extensions etc, 265 GCP inspections

Numer of patients 70,000 60,000 50,000 40,000 30,000 20,000 10,000 0 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 Year of MAA EU/EEA/EFTA North America ROW 5 Number of patients in pivotal trials submitted in MAAs to the EMA per region and year. The data are shown as three global regions EU/EEA/EFTA, North America and ROW (Rest of the World).

6

Draft Reflection paper on ethical and GCP aspects of clinical trials conducted in third countries for evaluation in marketing authorisation applications for medicines for human use, submitted to the EMA Public consultation completed 30th September 2010. Topic 1. Clarify the practical application of ethical standards for clinical trials, in the context of EMEA activities Topic 2. Determine the practical steps to be undertaken during the provision of guidance and advice in the drug development phase Topic 3. Determine the practical steps to be undertaken during the Marketing Authorisation phase Topic 4. International cooperation in the regulation of clinical trials, their review and inspection and capacity building in this area http://www.ema.europa.eu/inspections/docs/71239709en.pdf Working group members from CHMP/COMP/PDCO, PCWP, HCPWP, GCP IWG 7

Clarification of the practical application of ethical standards for clinical trials on medicinal products for human use in the context of the European Medicines Agency activities Local ethics committee and national regulatory authority oversight Information/Consent procedure Confidentiality Fair compensation for study related injury Vulnerable populations Choice of control - placebo and active comparator Access to treatment post trial Applicability of data to EEA population addressed in other guidance 8

Vulnerable populations Current DoH: 17. Medical research involving a disadvantaged or vulnerable population or community is only justified if the research is responsive to the health needs and priorities of this population or community and if there is a reasonable likelihood that this population or community stands to benefit from the results of the research. 18. Every medical research study involving human subjects must be preceded by careful assessment of predictable risks and burdens to the individuals and communities involved in the research in comparison with foreseeable benefits to them and to other individuals or communities affected by the condition under investigation. 9

Vulnerable populations The inclusion of vulnerable subjects in a clinical trial without the approval of the Ethics Committee and without implementation of the appropriate consent processes is a serious violation of ethical standards. EU Regulatory Authorities should disregard data obtained in such an unethical manner, when submitted in support of a MAA. In this [clinical trials included in MAAs] context it is mainly vulnerability due to poverty, lack of access to adequate health care systems, lack of access to medicines. Need to ensure that vulnerable persons or groups are not exploited for the benefit of EU patients. At the same time there are the needs to consider the benefit to the patient of taking part in the study and the ethics of potentially turning them away simply because they fit one of the vulnerable categories. Denying access to research is also not a solution. Information on the populations included in clinical trials in a MAA and any particular concerns should be 10 part of the European Public Assessment report.

Access to Treatment Post Trial Current DoH 14... The protocol should describe arrangements for post-study access by study subjects to interventions identified as beneficial in the study or access to other appropriate care or benefits. 33. At the conclusion of the study, patients entered into the study are entitled to be informed about the outcome of the study and to share any benefits that result from it, for example, access to interventions identified as beneficial in the study or to other appropriate care or benefits 11

Access to Treatment Post Trial Access to innovative medicinal products varies widely. Differences mostly reflect the.economic situation and social and health care systems of the country or region. Whether the medicinal product is likely to be available in the community or country should be considered by the sponsor, Ethics Committees and National Regulatory Authorities. New medicinal products should be intended for marketing in the countries or regions where the clinical trials are conducted. For the individual patient who participated in a clinical trial continued access to the product that has been identified as beneficial is crucial. It is recognized; however, that post trial access of patients to treatment or medical care provided by sponsor or investigator cannot substitute for shortcomings of national or regional health care 12 systems.

Access to Treatment Post Trial Transparency on matters of post trial access to treatment and medical care is paramount for clinical trials submitted to EMA in support of European MAA. This information will be summarised in the European Public Assessment Report (EPAR). 13

Biobanks Current Declaration of Helsinki 25. For medical research using identifiable human material or data, physicians must normally seek consent for the collection, analysis, storage and/or reuse. There may be situations where consent would be impossible or impractical to obtain for such research or would pose a threat to the validity of the research. In such situations the research may be done only after consideration and approval of a research ethics committee. 14

Biobanks Note for Guidance on definitions for genomic biomarkers, pharmacogenomics, pharmacogenetics, genomic data and sample coding categories (EMEA/CHMP/ICH/437986/2006) Reflection Paper on pharmacogenomics samples testing, testing and data handling (EMEA/CHMP/PGxWP/201914/2006) Reflection paper on pharmacogenomics in Oncology Large-scale study of populations may contribute significantly to science s understanding of the complex multi-factorial basis of disease and to improvements in prevention, detection, diagnosis, treatment and cure. Pharmacogenomics ( PGx) offer a potential for better understanding the mechanisms of diseases and optimizing the development and use of medicinal products. optimize the benefit/risk balance evaluation provide focussed information as guidance to prescribers and patients. may become a valuable tool in risk management and pharmacovigilance strategies. 15

Biobanks The use and exchange of human genetic material and the information derived from it, is not without some controversy. Within the scientific community, there is consensus that progress in understanding disease will depend on the establishment, harmonisation and broad use of human biobanks and genetic research databases. Human biobanks and genetic research databases which bring together and allow the sharing of human biological material and information derived from its analysis, are a key element of the scientific infrastructure underpinning such research. The potential of the Biotechnology can be developed only if data included in human biobanks are made available for research. The conditions under which the genomic data can be linked back to a subject s personal identifiers for any purpose, including the return of genomic data to the subject, should be described in research related documents, e.g. the informed consent document. Data protection and confidentiality have to be considered and ensured. In the EU the 16 general data security measures have to correspond to the Directive 95/46/EC.

Enhancement (Medical Enhancement) Directive 2001/83/EC defines a medicinal product as: Medicinal product: (a) Any substance or combination of substances presented as having properties for treating or preventing disease in human beings; or (b) Any substance or combination of substances which may be used in or administered to human beings either with a view to restoring, correcting or modifying physiological functions by exerting a pharmacological, immunological or metabolic action, or to making a medical diagnosis. EMA s role is to review MAAs for medicines whose proposed function is to treat or prevent disease. The issue of enhancement is therefore out of the scope of EMA activities and therefore no comment is 17 offered.

GOAL Subjects/patients participating in trials are fully protected wherever the trial takes places Availability of safe and effective new medicines, as early as possible, with data relevant to all regions 18

19 Thank you