Survey of Mineral Admixtures and Blended Cements in Ready Mixed Concrete

Similar documents
Asphalt Pavement Mix Production Survey On Reclaimed Asphalt Pavement, Reclaimed Asphalt Shingles, And Warm-mix Asphalt Usage:

Benchmarking Standards, Model Codes, Codes and Voluntary Guidelines on the HERS Index

Watershed Condition Framework

Accelerating Energy Efficiency in Texas

ANNEX E: Methodology for Estimating CH 4 Emissions from Coal Mining

HOW BIG IS AFRICA? Rules. recommended grades: 3-6

Knowledge Exchange Report

U.S. Drought Monitor, August 28, 2012

U.S. Drought Monitor, September 4, 2012


NEAUPG Annual Fall Meeting

U.S. Drought Monitor, July 31, 2012

U.S. Drought Monitor, October 2, 2012

ENERGY STAR Oil Furnaces Product List

The Clean Power Plan NJ Clean Air Council Meeting

Do you have staff reviewing formation filings for name availability purposes or is this done electronically?

Chapter TRI Data and Trends (Original Industries Only)

The next big reliability challenge: EPA revised ozone standard

Meat Animals Production, Disposition, and Income 2015 Summary

Trends in. U.S. Delivered Coal Costs: July 2012

Case Study: market growth strategy. - Selection of slides

U.S. Drought Monitor, August 7, 2012

Milk Production, Disposition, and Income 2014 Summary

Government Spending and Air Pollution in the US

Methodology. Respondents. Survey Process

CALCULATING THE SUPPLEMENTAL NUTRITION ASSISTANCE PROGRAM (SNAP) PROGRAM ACCESS INDEX: A STEP-BY-STEP GUIDE FOR 2013

Pollution Control Exemptions for Pipelines

CALCULATING THE SUPPLEMENTAL NUTRITION ASSISTANCE PROGRAM (SNAP) PROGRAM ACCESS INDEX: A STEP-BY-STEP GUIDE FOR 2015

Facts on Direct-to-Consumer Food Marketing

Milk Production. January Milk Production up 2.7 Percent

April June Labor Market Outlook. Published by the Society for Human Resource Management. Labor Market Outlook Survey Q (April June)

Updated State-level Greenhouse Gas Emission Coefficients for Electricity Generation

U.S. Drought Monitor, August 14, 2012

Labor Market Outlook. Labor Market Outlook Survey Q (October December) Published by the Society for Human Resource Management

Meat Animals Production, Disposition, and Income 2011 Summary

Asphalt Pavement Industry Survey on

Electronic Check Service Quick Reference Guide

Does your company lease any provider networks from other dental plans or network management companies? (Please check all that apply)

Cattle. January 1 Cattle Inventory Up 3 Percent

Crop Progress. Corn Planted - Selected States [These 18 States planted 92% of the 2016 corn acreage] Corn Emerged - Selected States ISSN:

Overview and Background: Regulation of Power Plants under EPA s Proposed Clean Power Plan

Crop Progress. Corn Planted - Selected States [These 18 States planted 92% of the 2017 corn acreage] Corn Emerged - Selected States ISSN:

Steers weighing 500 pounds and over, as of January 1, 2018, totaled 16.4 million head, down slightly from January 1, 2017.

General Manager: Front Desk Manager: Front Desk/Shift Supervisor: Housekeeping or Environmental Services Manager: Housekeeping Supervisor/Inspector:

2012 Distribution Best Practices Benchmarking Company Profile Data Packet

Crop Progress. Corn Planted - Selected States [These 18 States planted 92% of the 2017 corn acreage]

LTC Implementation of LADOTD Mass Concrete & Maturity Testing Specifications. Presented by. Mark A. Cheek, PE, FACI Vice-President

Honey Final Estimates

Crop Progress. Corn Harvested Selected States [These 18 States harvested 94% of the 2017 corn acreage]

(404) Solid Waste Management Program

Crop Progress. NASS Survey Update!

Milk Production, Disposition, and Income 2011 Summary

Interstate Movement Of Municipal Solid Waste

Crop Progress. Corn Silking Selected States [These 18 States planted 92% of the 2017 corn acreage]

Potential Impacts to Texas of EPA s Clean Power Plan. Brian Tulloh Austin Electricity Conference April 9, 2015

Crop Progress. Corn Dented Selected States [These 18 States planted 92% of the 2017 corn acreage] Corn Mature Selected States ISSN:

Emission Factors and Energy Prices. for Leonardo Academy s. Cleaner and Greener Program

Forest Resources of the United States, 2017:

Honey. United States Honey Production Down 1 Percent

Crop Progress. Corn Mature Selected States [These 18 States planted 93% of the 2015 corn acreage]

U.S. Department of Labor

The Denver Water System

Pocket Planners :00am - 4:30pm Eastern Time

Production per cow in the 23 major States averaged 1,891 pounds for January, 17 pounds above January 2013.

Climate Regulation in the United States

ALUMNI MAGAZINE. Media Kit

Q October-December. Jobs Outlook Survey Report. Published by the Society for Human Resource Management

Honey. United States Honey Production Down 16 Percent

Water Reuse: A Little Less Talk. Texas Water Reuse Conference July 20, 2012

Crop Progress. Special Note

Invasive Species There is an App and a Map for That

PA = Prior Appropriation R = Riparian AD = Absolute Dominion RU = Reasonable Use CR = Correlative Rights RSTMT = Restatement of Torts (Second)

Capacity of Refrigerated Warehouses 2017 Summary

TABLE OF CONTENTS ONLY

AMERICAN FORESTRY CONGRESS

Milk Production. January Milk Production up 1.8 Percent

Customer Information Sheet

Welcome to the BPA Brand Report

Forest Resources of the United States, 2017: A Technical Document Supporting the Forest Service Update of the 2010 RPA Assessment

Legislative Trends: Upcoming Increases to Minimum Wage Round-up 2018

Fatal Occupational Injuries in Maine 2004

PUBLISHER S AUDIENCE STATEMENT December 2017

Crop Production ISSN:

Internet Appendix for The Impact of Bank Credit on Labor Reallocation and Aggregate Industry Productivity

LOOKING TO OUR FUTURE. Managing West Michigan Discards in an Emerging Circular Economy

Crop Progress. Cotton Bolls Opening Selected States [These 15 States planted 99% of the 2010 cotton acreage]

±450 Acre Premiere Business Park

EPA s Proposed Clean Power Plan: Rate to Mass Conversion

SAMPLE REPORT. Competitive Landscape for Wholesale Distribution: Fasteners $ RESEARCHED & PRODUCED BY:

Data and Analysis from EIA to Inform Policymakers, Industry, and the Public Regarding Power Sector Trends

Industrial Energy Efficiency as a Resource by Region

Predict. Prevent. Protect. Transform.

A Model Modernization: Edith Green-Wendell Wyatt Federal Building and GSA s Mid-Century Inventory

Streamflow of 2013 Water Year Summary

Labor Market Outlook. Labor Market Outlook Survey Q (October December) Published by the Society for Human Resource Management

All cows and heifers that have calved, at 39.1 million, were down 2 percent from the 40.0 million on January 1, 2011.

Land Values and Cash Rents

NCAT Pavement Test Track. Buzz Powell Pavement Preservation Research

Knowledge Exchange Report. Economic Impact of Mandatory Overtime on New York State Agriculture

PJM-MISO Stakeholder JCM Briefing June 30, 2005 Joint and Common Market Portal

Transcription:

Survey of Mineral Admixtures and Blended Cements in Ready Mixed Concrete A survey of concrete producers to quantify the use of cement, admixtures and blended cements in ready mixed concrete. October 2000 The information contained herein is based on sources which we believe reliable but are not guaranteed by us. The Portland Cement Association assumes no legal responsibility for the outcomes of decisions or commitments made on the basis of this information. Copyright 2000 by the Portland Cement Association. All rights reserved.

Survey of Mineral Admixtures and Blended Cements in Ready Mixed Concrete The Portland Cement Association s (PCA s) Market Research Department analyzed the results of a questionnaire designed and administered by the National Ready Mixed Concrete Association (NRMCA). This survey was conducted to quantify the use of cement, admixtures and blended cements in ready-mixed concrete. The aggregate results will be shared with PCA and NRMCA members as well as with the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and other government agencies. The 1998 survey was the second follow-up to a benchmark survey conducted in 1983 and an initial follow-up conducted in 1989. Comparisons among these three surveys are presented in this analysis. Methodology Questionnaires were mailed to all 1,400 members of the NRMCA. A sample questionnaire is located in Appendix A. In exchange for returning a completed questionnaire, respondents were offered a complimentary copy of the videotape, Stockpile Recovery to Minimize Segregation. s were instructed to fill out a separate form for company production in each NRMCA region. The NRMCA regions are defined in Appendix B. In total, 125 surveys were returned, achieving a 9% response rate. This sample size allows for statistical analysis at the 95% confidence level with a margin of error of plus or minus 9%. Caution is advised when reviewing the results of subcategories of data since smaller bases yield higher margins of error. While the company production and regional break-outs contain important information, these results may be less reliable due to lower response rates. Executive Summary This summary highlights key information obtained from the survey; however, the 1998 aggregate results are located in data tables in Appendix C. The first section of this summary contains data reported by respondents for all types of concrete. The following five sections contain data for specific types of concrete mixes, including fly ash concrete, ground slag concrete, concrete with other pozzolans, portland cement only concrete, and blended cement concrete. Total Concrete Total concrete production was 38.7 million cubic yards in 1998. This represented approximately 11% of a 340 million cubic yard market. In 1989, respondent production was 35.7 million cubic yards, representing 15% of an estimated 240 million cubic yard market. Ninety-five percent of the production represented in this survey was manufactured by companies with an annual production over 100,000 cubic yards. This was a slight increase from the 1989 figure of 93%. In 1983, companies of this size accounted for only 74% of the total production. PCA Market Research September 2000 2000 Survey of Admixtures and Blended Cements Page 1

An average of 311,800 cubic yards of concrete were produced per respondent in 1998. For total concrete, on average 460 pounds of cement were used per cubic yard of concrete. Following a 9% decline in the amount of cement in concrete used between 1983 (499 pounds) and 1989 (453 pounds), there was only a slight increase in the amount of cement used between 1989 (499 pounds) and 1998 (460 pounds). Ten percent of the concrete produced by respondents was used in highway infrastructure (i.e. bridges, pavements). In 1998, an average of 11,234 employees worked at 738 plants resulting in an average of 15 employees per plant. Companies produced an average of 3,441 cubic yards of concrete per employee in 1998. This was up from 3,237 cubic yards per employee in 1989. The majority of concrete reported by 1998 respondents was produced by companies who used fly ash in their mixes (53.6%), and more than one-third of the concrete was produced by companies that produce portland cement only concrete (36.9%). The remaining 10% of concrete was produced by companies that used ground slag (8.9%), blended cement (0.3%) and other pozzolans (0.4%) in their concrete mixes. Fly Ash Concrete Companies who used fly ash in their mixes accounted for 94% of the total concrete production in 1998. While this was not significantly different from the 92% recorded in 1989, it was three times the 1983 figure of 31%. In both 1998 and 1989, approximately 54% of all concrete contained fly ash. This was up from 46% percent in 1983. An average of 209,100 cubic yards of fly ash concrete were produced per respondent in 1998. In 1998, fly ash concrete contained a calculated average of 119 pounds of fly ash and 442 pounds of cement per cubic yard. This level of fly ash concrete was up from both the 1989 and 1983 calculations of approximately 107 pounds. The amount of cement per cubic yard in 1998 wasjust slightly more than the amount reported in 1989 (436 pounds), but significantly less than the 1983 average of 497 pounds of cement per cubic yard. The amount of cementitious materials actually used by respondents differed from the amount typically used by respondents. For example, when 1998 survey participants were asked how many pounds of cement and fly ash were in a typical cubic yard of fly ash concrete, respondents reported that a typical mixture consisted of 101 pounds of fly ash and 432 pounds of cement. Yet, when participants were asked to provide the quantity of each ingredient in fly ash concrete, the quantities of fly ash and cement found in fly ash concrete averaged 18 pounds per cubic yard more of the fly ash (resulting in a total of 119 pounds per cubic yard) and 10 pounds per cubic yard more of the cement (resulting in a total of 442 pounds per cubic yard). These differences were even more evident when examining the regional and company size sub-categories of data. The average amount of fly ash per cubic yard of concrete was estimated at 65 pounds. Although this figure remained relatively constant between 1983 and 1989, at approximately 40 pounds per cubic yard, this figure jumped 25 pounds between 1989 and 1998. When asked which type of ASTM C 618 fly ash they use, 51% of the respondents reported using Class C and 49% reported using Class F. s used an average of 466 tons of fly ash in flowable fill and produced an average of 3,091 cubic yards of flowable fill. PCA Market Research September 2000 2000 Survey of Admixtures and Blended Cements Page 2

Ground Slag Concrete In 1998, respondents reported producing a total of 3,423,000 cubic yards of ground slag concrete, averaging 131,700 cubic yards per respondent. In the case of ground slag concrete, like fly ash concrete, the quantities of cementitious materials actually used differed from the amounts typically used. When respondents were asked how much cement and ground slag were in a typical cubic yard of ground slag concrete, the quantities varied significantly from the values calculated by their responses. For example, in 1998, ground slag concrete contained a calculated average of 236 pounds of ground slag and 324 pounds of cement per cubic yard. Yet, respondents reported that a typical ground slag mixture contained 179 pounds of ground slag and 364 pounds of cement. Concrete With Other Pozzolans s reported producing a total of 140,800 cubic yards of concrete made with other pozzolans, averaging 17,600 cubic yards per respondent. Once again, respondents reported differences in quantities of cement and pozzolans used versus the quantities found in a typical cubic yard of concrete. When calculated from respondent values, an average of 76 pounds per cubic yard of other pozzolans and 416 pounds of cement are used to manufacture concrete. However, the respondents then reported that a typical cubic yard of concrete with other pozzolans contains 60 pounds per cubic yard of other pozzolans and 579 pounds per cubic yard of cement. Note that the response rates for concrete with other pozzolans were low. Portland Cement Only Concrete s in 1998 reported producing 14,269,900 cubic yards of portland cement only concrete. Portland cement only users indicated that an average cubic yard of concrete contained 531 pounds of cement per cubic yard. Blended Cement Concrete s reported producing a total of 123,300 cubic yards of blended cement, averaging 20,500 cubic yards per respondent in 1998. Blended cement concrete contained a calculated average of 459 pounds of blended cement per cubic yard of concrete according to the five respondents who responded to this question on the survey. PCA Market Research September 2000 2000 Survey of Admixtures and Blended Cements Page 3

Appendix A: Questionnaire

NRMCA Survey October 1999 Use of Mineral Admixtures and Blended Cements in Ready Mixed Concrete This survey seeks to quantify the use of mineral admixtures like fly ash, ground slag, or other separately batched cementitious material in ready mixed concrete. We also request your input to estimate the amount of blended cement used and flowable fill production. This survey is intended to provide data to EPA and other governmental agencies regarding the use of these by-product materials. A frequently quoted statistic is that blended cement used by the concrete industry is only 1.5% of the total cement shipped and the information on mineral admixture usage is not readily available. Individual company information on production will be kept confidential. Previous surveys were conducted in 1983 and 1990. Fill out separate form for company production in each NRMCA region (see map at back) INFORMATION REGARDING TOTAL USAGE IN 1998 IS REQUESTED. COMPLETE ALL THAT APPLY. Fly Ash Ground Slag Other Pozzolans, -? Tons of Mineral Admixtures used tons 1 tons 2 tons 3 Tons of Cement Portland Cement, Types I, II, III, V Blended Cement, Type IP, IS Used tons 4 tons 5 Cubic Yards of Fly Ash Ground Slag Other Pozzolans Concrete with cy. 6 cy. 7 cy. 8 Cubic Yards of Portland Cement only Blended Cement only Concrete with cy. 9 cy. 10 Total Cubic Yards Concrete Produced cy. 11 Cubic Yards in Highway Infrastructure (bridges, pavements) cy 12 Please indicate the average amount of cementitious materials used in a typical cubic yard of concrete Type of concrete mixture Portland cement, lb./cu. yd. Mineral admixture, lb./cu. yd. 13 Containing only portland cement Containing fly ash Containing ground slag 14 15 16 17 18 19 Containing other pozzolans Which Class (ASTM C 618) of Fly Ash do you use Flowable Fill (CLSM)! Class C 21 %Class C Flowable fill produced, cubic yards! Class F 20 If Both % Class F 22 Fly ash used in flowable fill, tons Company/Division Address City, State, Zip This information is to test the adequacy of the sample. Number of employees in ready mixed operations 25 Number of plants represented by production Please Circle the NRMCA Region of production (refer to map on the back). Eastern Southeastern Great Lakes Midwest N. Central 27 S. Central Rocky Mountain Pacific NW Pacific SW Free video offer (see back). Send the video Contact Phone! Yes! No Additional tapes (at $5 each + S&H) Respond by November 15, 1999. Thank you for your participation ATTN. COLIN LOBO PLEASE FAX BACK TO: NRMCA (301) 585-4219 Or mail to: NRMCA, 900 Spring Street, Silver Spring, MD 20910 26 23 24

Appendix B: NRMCA Census Region Definitions

NRMCA Census Region Definitions Pacific Northwest Idaho Montana Oregon Washington Pacific Southwest Arizona California Nevada North Central Iowa Minnesota Nebraska North Dakota South Dakota Rocky Mountain Colorado New Mexico Utah Wyoming Great Lakes Midwest Illinois Indiana Michigan Ohio Wisconsin South Central Arkansas Kansas Louisiana Missouri Oklahoma Texas Eastern Connecticut Delaware Maine Maryland Massachusetts New Hampshire Rhode Island Vermont New Jersey New York Pennsylvania Virginia West Virginia Southeastern Alabama Florida Georgia Kentucky Mississippi North Carolina South Carolina Tennessee

Appendix C: The Data Tables

1998 Distribution of Concrete Production by Company Size Production (000 yd 3 ) 0-10 30.3 16.5 0.0 0.0 11.0 2.9 10-25 352.6 149.1 0.0 0.0 203.0 0.4 25-50 676.8 284.6 42.0 1.1 344.1 5.0 50-100 984.9 399.1 55.5 54.6 475.7 0.0 100-250 5754.5 2,787.8 620.3 1.0 2,231.3 114.0 250-750 11839.7 6,002.7 1,052.2 82.6 4,701.2 1.0 > 750 19022.6 11,064.5 1,653.0 1.5 6,303.6 0.0 Total 38661.3 20,704.3 3,423.0 140.8 14,269.9 123.3 Production Mix (%) 0-10 100.0% 54.4% 0.0% 0.0% 36.2% 9.4% 10-25 100.0% 42.3% 0.0% 0.0% 57.6% 0.1% 25-50 100.0% 42.1% 6.2% 0.2% 50.8% 0.7% 50-100 100.0% 40.5% 5.6% 5.5% 48.3% 0.0% 100-250 100.0% 48.4% 10.8% 0.0% 38.8% 2.0% 250-750 100.0% 50.7% 8.9% 0.7% 39.7% 0.0% > 750 100.0% 58.2% 8.7% 0.0% 33.1% 0.0% Total 100.0% 53.6% 8.9% 0.4% 36.9% 0.3% % of Total Production 0-10 0.1% 0.1% 0.0% 0.0% 0.1% 2.3% 10-25 0.9% 0.7% 0.0% 0.0% 1.4% 0.4% 25-50 1.8% 1.4% 1.2% 0.8% 2.4% 4.1% 50-100 2.5% 1.9% 1.6% 38.8% 3.3% 0.0% 100-250 14.9% 13.5% 18.1% 0.7% 15.6% 92.5% 250-750 30.6% 29.0% 30.7% 58.7% 32.9% 0.8% > 750 49.2% 53.4% 48.3% 1.1% 44.2% 0.0% Total 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

1998 Average Production by Company Size Number of s 0-10 5 3 0 0 2 1 10-25 18 11 0 0 16 1 25-50 18 13 1 3 16 1 50-100 14 9 2 1 14 0 100-250 36 32 11 1 35 2 250-750 26 24 8 2 25 1 > 750 7 7 4 1 7 0 Total 124 99 26 8 115 6 Mix (%) 0-10 100.0% 60.0% 40.0% 20.0% 10-25 100.0% 61.1% 88.9% 5.6% 25-50 100.0% 72.2% 5.6% 16.7% 88.9% 5.6% 50-100 100.0% 64.3% 14.3% 7.1% 100.0% 100-250 100.0% 88.9% 30.6% 2.8% 97.2% 5.6% 250-750 100.0% 92.3% 30.8% 7.7% 96.2% 3.8% > 750 100.0% 100.0% 57.1% 14.3% 100.0% Total 100.0% 79.8% 21.0% 6.5% 92.7% 4.8% Average Production Levels (000 yds 3 ) 0-10 6.1 5.5 5.5 2.9 10-25 19.6 13.6 12.7 0.4 25-50 37.6 21.9 42.0 0.4 21.5 5.0 50-100 70.3 44.3 27.8 54.6 34.0 100-250 159.8 87.1 56.4 1.0 63.8 57.0 250-750 455.4 250.1 131.5 41.3 188.0 1.0 > 750 2,717.5 1,580.6 413.3 1.5 900.5 Total 311.8 209.1 131.7 17.6 124.1 20.5

Calculated (lbs/yd 3 ) Calculated (lbs/yd 3 ) Reported (lbs/yd 3 ) Percent of Average Cement Use Average Fly Ash Use Typical Cementitious Material % of Total Total Concrete Production Total Portland Fly Ash Total Fly Ash Portland Fly Ash Concrete Used in Highway (000 yd 3 ) Concrete Cement Only Concrete Concrete Concrete Cement Only Cement Fly Ash with Fly Ash Infrastructure 0-10 460.1 513.7 375.6 85.1 101.8 532.0 405.3 102.0 54.4% 0.0% 10-25 472.6 490.8 421.0 71.8 118.7 510.1 449.5 101.2 42.3% 7.3% 25-50 455.6 555.5 465.8 73.2 131.2 515.5 449.9 110.1 42.1% 1.7% 50-100 472.3 618.6 469.0 74.6 155.7 522.9 444.6 92.0 40.5% 2.9% 100-250 457.9 518.0 439.9 54.7 110.6 515.0 428.2 97.2 48.4% 8.8% 250-750 449.8 547.6 441.1 59.3 110.2 525.7 409.8 101.1 50.7% 6.8% > 750 456.6 476.6 429.2 79.5 127.8 537.3 461.9 114.9 58.2% 13.2% Total 459.7 530.8 442.2 64.7 119.2 519.4 432.2 101.4 53.6% 10.1% # of Responses 117 64 71 98 98 114 97 96 99 47 Min 240 332 289 0 31 385 209 31 N/A N/A Max 775 693 616 154 600 679 580 170 N/A N/A Std. Deviation 75.5 85.1 67.6 36.7 73.1 47.2 60.4 25.5 30.5% 20.9% 95% C. I. (±) 13.7 20.9 15.7 7.3 14.5 8.7 12.0 5.1 6.0% 6.0% Calculated (lbs/yd 3 ) Calculated (lbs/yd 3 ) Reported (lbs/yd 3 ) Percent of Average Cement Use Average Fly Ash Use Typical Cementitious Material % of Total Total Concrete NRMCA Total Portland Fly Ash Total Fly Ash Portland Fly Ash Concrete Used in Highway Regions Concrete Cement Only Concrete Concrete Concrete Cement Only Cement Fly Ash w/fly Ash Infrastructure Eastern 478.0 905.2 482.4 52.3 143.5 545.5 466.6 101.3 16.7% 5.6% South Central 461.4 568.3 409.6 61.0 108.6 495.3 393.9 100.1 66.4% 20.2% Southeastern 445.3 547.1 428.7 89.3 126.1 518.8 420.7 118.6 59.2% 5.0% Great Lakes Midwest 450.4 543.0 456.8 42.5 83.6 509.2 427.7 85.5 53.2% 18.8% Pacific Northwest 473.0 492.9 452.4 61.1 95.4 512.0 446.7 95.0 75.6% 3.6% North Central 448.0 487.6 431.9 79.3 169.3 506.6 444.2 98.2 56.0% 2.4% Rocky Mountian* Pacific Southwest* Total 459.7 530.8 442.2 64.7 119.2 519.4 432.2 101.4 53.6% 10.1% # of Responses 117 64 71 98 98 114 97 96 99 47 Min 240 332 289 0 31 385 209 31 N/A N/A Max 775 693 616 154 600 679 580 170 N/A N/A Std. Deviation 75.5 85.1 67.6 36.7 73.1 47.2 60.4 25.5 30.5% 20.9% 95% C. I. (±) 13.7 20.9 15.7 7.3 14.5 8.7 12.0 5.1 6.0% 6.0% * = Too few responses to report 1998 Cement and Fly Ash Usage/Yd 3 by Company Size 1998 Cement and Fly Ash Usage/Yd 3 by Region

1998 Admixtures and Blended Cements/Yd 3 by Size of Company Calculated (lbs/yd 3 ) Average (Avg.) Cement Use Production Portland Cement Fly Ash Ground Slag Other Pozzolan (000 yd 3 ) Only Concrete Concrete Concrete* Concrete* Total 530.8 442.2 323.8 415.6 # of Responses 64 71 10 2 Min 332 289 196 400 Max 693 616 392 432 Std. Deviation 85.1 68 64 23 95% C. I. () 20.9 15.7 39.9 31.2 Calculated (lbs/yd 3 ) Avg. Gound Slag Use Avg. Other Pozzolan Use Avg. Blended Cement Use Production Total Ground Slag Total Other Pozzolan Total Blended Cement (000 yd 3 ) Concrete Concrete Concrete* Concrete* Concrete* Concrete* Total 62.5 235.9 12.8 75.5 149.6 458.6 # of Responses 28.0 26.0 8.0 8.0 5.0 5.0 Min 0.0 33.3 0.1 40.0 1.4 168.4 Max 245.7 815.2 80.5 200.0 491.2 640.0 Std. Deviation 75.4 168.9 28.2 53.7 200.7 174.0 95% C. I. () 27.9 64.9 19.6 37.2 175.9 152.5 Reported (lbs/yd 3 ) Typical Cementitious Material Production Ground Slag Other Pozzolans (000 yd 3 ) Cement Ground Slag Cement* Pozzolans* Total 363.8 179.2 578.4 60.0 # of Responses 26.0 26.0 7.0 7.0 Min 197.0 30.0 433.0 25.0 Max 520.0 333.0 658.0 103.0 Std. Deviation 85.0 66.7 81.4 26.9 95% C. I. () 32.7 25.7 60.3 19.9 * Note low response rates

1998 Distribution of Employment Data by Company Size Total Number of Employees 0-10 19 16 0 0 16 3 10-25 176 110 0 0 176 7 25-50 280 201 30 66 280 14 50-100 400 253 54 22 350 0 100-250 1,814 1,618 565 0 1,782 198 250-750 3,091 2,841 983 151 2,991 90 > 750 5,430 5,430 4,240 300 5,430 0 Total 11,234 10,493 5,872 539 11,049 312 Total Number of Plants 0-10 4 3 0 0 3 1 10-25 22 15 0 0 22 1 25-50 25 19 1 6 24 1 50-100 36 26 4 1 32 0 100-250 144 131 30 0 138 24 250-750 224 211 58 9 219 4 > 750 282 282 199 18 282 0 Total 738 688 292 34 721 31 Average Number of Employees per Plant 0-10 4.8 5.3 5.3 3.0 10-25 8.0 7.3 8.0 7.0 25-50 11.2 10.6 30.0 11.0 11.7 14.0 50-100 11.1 9.7 13.5 22.0 10.9 100-250 12.6 12.4 18.8 12.9 8.3 250-750 13.8 13.5 16.9 16.8 13.7 22.5 > 750 19.3 19.3 21.3 16.7 19.3 Total 15.2 15.3 20.1 15.9 15.3 10.1

1998 Employee Based Productivity of Ready-Mixed Plants Production (000 yds 3 ) 0-10 30.3 16.5 0.0 0.0 11.0 2.9 10-25 352.6 149.1 0.0 0.0 203.0 0.4 25-50 676.8 284.6 42.0 1.1 344.1 5.0 50-100 984.9 399.1 55.5 54.6 475.7 0.0 100-250 5,754.5 2,787.8 620.3 1.0 2,231.3 114.0 250-750 11,839.7 6,002.7 1,052.2 82.6 4,701.2 1.0 > 750 19,022.6 11,064.5 1,653.0 1.5 6,303.6 0.0 Total 38,661.3 20,704.3 3,423.0 140.8 14,269.9 123.3 Production per Employee (yds 3 /Employee) 0-10 1,595.21 1,030.00 686.19 950.00 10-25 2,003.23 1,355.79 1,153.37 62.57 25-50 2,417.04 1,415.91 1,399.60 16.52 1,228.91 357.14 50-100 2,462.22 1,577.39 1,027.78 2,483.73 1,359.04 100-250 3,172.27 1,723.01 1,097.92 1,252.16 575.76 250-750 3,830.38 2,112.90 1,070.40 547.02 1,571.77 11.11 > 750 3,503.24 2,037.66 389.86 5.00 1,160.89 Total 3,441.46 1,973.16 582.94 261.28 1,291.51 395.15

1998 Fly Ash Class (ASTM C 618) Company Average Use of: Average Fly Ash Use Average Amount of Production Class C Class F in Flowable Fill Flowable Fill produced (000 yd 3 ) Fly Ash (%) Fly Ash (%) Tons Cubic Yards 0-10 0% 100% 29 200 10-25 73% 27% 99 195 25-50 54% 46% 61 573 50-100 44% 56% 251 1462 100-250 54% 46% 396 2394 250-750 48% 52% 454 3110 > 750 26% 74% 1988 17577 Total 51% 49% 466 3091