My supervisor gives me ongoing feedback to help me improve performance I know how my department measures success.

Similar documents
ENJOY BEING PART OF THEIR DEPARTMENT

Washington State University Employee Engagement Survey Report. Prepared by: Human Resource Services August 2014

GRADUATE SCHOOL 2018 ADVANCING THE UNIVERSITY S MISSION: ENJOY BEING PART OF THEIR DEPARTMENT

VOILAND COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING AND ARCHITECTURE 2018

COLLEGE OF AGRICULTURAL, HUMAN & NATURAL RESOURCE SCIENCES 2018

2016 EMPLOYEE SURVEY RESULTS AND ANALYSIS

BUILDING A CULTURE OF ENGAGEMENT: THE IMPORTANCE OF SENIOR LEADERSHIP

SANTA MONICA COLLEGE 2017 College Employee Satisfaction Survey. Results and Findings

Campus Climate Initiative Action Items June 15, 2017

UAF Administrative Services Work Environment Survey. Prepared for: University of Alaska, Fairbanks Administrative Services

Washington State University. Human Resource Services

Work Expectations Profile

Supervisor Success Series 3S. Session 3: Your Responsibilities as a Supervisor

Survey Results: Appendix: See our Web Page: The University of Texas at Austin 2014

Washington State University

Penn State Outreach Strategic Plan for Diversity

Equity Action Plan. Department of Facilities Management Division of Construction

For discussion only. HR_design_plan_presentation_powerpoint Campus Forums Sept 27.pptx

Managing Performance in DoD: Creating a Culture of High Performance

HUMAN RESOURCES PROGRAMS

Performance Development Framework. A Guide for Staff and Supervisors Part A

OUR PEOPLE, OUR STRENGTH

Employee retention: It starts at the top. Culture, engagement and top performance best practices for CEOs

Minot State University Staff Satisfaction Report. May The Staff Satisfaction Survey was conducted in late April staff employees

ORGANISATIONAL AND PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT POLICY

2010 Employee Survey Results. May 2010

Institutional Climate Update

EMPLOYABILITY & STUDENT EMPLOYMENT

Legislation Requirements

GBAS Workshop: Making Performance Appraisals Work for my Unit

Staff Survey Table Discussion / Supervisory Forum March 22, 2018

STUDENT SERVICES SPECIALIST-TRANSFER, CAREER AND EMPLOYMENT Job Description

Chapter 1. Modern Supervision: Concepts and Skills

Finance and Administration. Data Report

Annual Self Performance Review

Classified Performance Planning, Progress Review, and Evaluation Form FY20

Classification and Reclassification

Employer handbook for. Internships. We are in the business of building successful futures. TM


HR Design Information Sessions December 2015

2015 Staff Senate Survey Results

Employee Survey Results Summary Report

Monument Credit Union Employee Opinion Survey. Employee Report. Presented by:

2014 Performance Management Survey

2011 Employee Job Satisfaction and Engagement

DIVISION OF FINANCE AND ADMINISTRATION STRATEGIC PLAN

Chapter 7E: Nurturing Human Capital/Focus on Staff

EMPLOYEE ENGAGEMENT SURVEY

1925 San Jacinto Blvd., D3500 Phone (512) Austin, Texas Fax (512)

Lead with the Right Foot: Conducting New Staff Orientation Programs

EMPLOYEE ENGAGEMENT SURVEY 2011 RESULTS

HUMAN RESOURCES MANAGER Range B72 BOD 11/28/12

HRM. Unit 1. Dr. Vinita Pimpale. Dr. Vinita Pimpale R.A.Podar College of Commerce & Economics

1. The Director of Human Resources (Recruiting) shall have the general qualifications of a teacher as prescribed by the State Department of Education.

Employer Survey 2015

Employee Well-Being: How-Tos and Takeaways From Two Successful Programs. October 18, 2018

20% 19% 9% 11% 8% 4% 4% 5% Satisfaction with UC San Diego. Satisfaction Mean Scores by Question Dimension

Guide How to attract and retain good employees

Internship Creation and Maintenance Guide

Building a Professional Development Program with Lynda.com Administrative Manual St. Olaf Human Resources Department

28% 17% Satisfaction Mean Scores by Question Dimension

Marathon County Employee Performance Appraisal Form

DIVERSITY AND INCLUSION

2018 Employee Climate Survey

EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE EVALUATION

Winston-Salem State University Staff Satisfaction Survey Spring 2015 N = 104

Washington State University NOTICE OF VACANCY. Position # TITLE: Assistant/Associate Professor Soil Nutrient and Residue Management

Self Assessment Guide for a Great Safety Culture

Workforce Development Retention That Works

THE EMPLOYEE ENGAGEMENT METRICS EXPLAINED

Comprehensive Classification and Compensation Study for Austin Community College. Presentation of the Process and Results

8 Reasons the Millennials Drive Us Crazy & How to Prepare Them to be Star High Potentials!

Dartmouth College Employee Survey Results. April 27, 2006

FMEP: Facilities Management Evaluation Program

2019 Webinar Catalog

Human Resources Strategic Update. Presented by Stephen Trncak October 28, 2011

EMPLOYEE ENGAGEMENT SURVEY

EMPLOYEE ENGAGEMENT SURVEY

Building a collaborative workplace. Radek Nowak, Ph.D.

SUPERVISORY COMPETENCY DISCUSSION TOOLKIT

Workforce strategies to enhance State Oral Health Program capacity. Samantha Jordan

The Ohio State University Human Resources Strategic Plan

Gender Pay Gap Report

HR Design DRAFT Recommendations Employee Development Work Team Released for Review: May 15, 2012

The below article is from the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics and can be found here.

An Employer s Guide to Motor Vehicle Apprenticeships at Bolton College s new STEM Centre

Mentors are very dedicated individuals with a strong. commitment to quality resident care. Our Mentors have strong belief in our Community and

TITLE AND TOTAL COMPENSATION STUDY

Campus Culture, Shared Governance, Morale and Wellness

The Evergreen State College Exempt Staff Compensation Plan Procedures July 2016

2018 Work and Well-Being Survey

Journey Mapping the New Hire Onboarding Experience

OPPD Business Transformation

Job Family Matrix. Independently provide a broad range of Human Resources advice and services for assigned client groups and/or Senior HR.

Get paid to help companies hire, motivate and manage people! FabJob Guide to. Become a. Human Resources Professional. Tara Foote. Visit

Outcomes. The Retention Dilemma Balancing Costs and Employee Engagement

TalentC-People Services Inc Baird Street North Regina,Saskatchewan. Canada S4X 3B6

Enhancing Employee Engagement: The Role of the Immediate

What We ve Done to Date: A status report to employees on progress made on the 2004 employee survey

GW Human Resources Strategic Plan

Transcription:

NOT DISCLOSED PULLMAN CAMPUS There were 247 respondents who did not identified their department, however identified themselves located on the Pullman campus with a response average for statements 1-25, of 3.54, which was higher than the WSU average of 3.72. The average for the faculty specific statements was 3.60, which was higher than the WSU average of 3.63. Of those who responded, 39% were civil service 27% were administrative professionals, and 24% were faculty. HIGHEST RESPONSE AVERAGE: Statements WSU Average Area Average I receive the information I need to perform my job. 4.07 3.97 Those around me are committed to doing quality work. 4.12 4.00 I have the technology I need to do my job efficiently. 4.16 4.06 I know what is expected of me at work. 4.39 4.32 LOWEST RESPONSE AVERAGE: Statements WSU Average Area Average I receive clear information about changes being made within my college/area. 3.18 2.93 I receive clear information about changes being made within WSU. 3.16 3.04 My supervisor gives me ongoing feedback to help me improve performance. 3.29 3.05 I know how my department measures success. 3.27 3.10 I feel encouraged to have a good balance between work and personal life. 3.42 3.14 EMPLOYEE FEEDBACK: At the end of the survey, employees were given the opportunity to provide feedback regarding subjects not addressed in the survey. The following feedback, specifically related to employee perceptions of the workplace, was provided by respondents who identified themselves located on the WSU Pullman. Enjoy working for WSU Enjoy co-workers and people on campus Compensation; underpaid for job duties; inequities in salary increases and value assessments Poor performers not held to the same expectations; those who complain get rewarded; different expectations for various employee types; university administrators and leaders not held to the same expectations Changes are made to employees positions without input from employee Leadership training for all administrators in high level positions Organizational changes across the university don t make sense Opportunities for advancement; career development Trust and respect are lacking Departmental silos; us vs them mentality across departments and colleges Supervisory behavior; lack of open communication Washington State University Human Resource Services 105

RESPONSE AVERAGE BREAKDOWN: WSU Not Disclosed Pullman # of Respondents 247 Overall response average for statements 1-25 3.72 3.54 Faculty Specific Response Average 3.63 3.60 FACULTY SPECIFIC SECTION: Do faculty feel they provide contributions within their faculty appointments? I have support to pursue my research opportunities. 3.61 3.44 I have input regarding my teaching opportunities and assignments. 3.77 3.88 I am encouraged to participate in mentoring activities. 3.50 3.48 SECTION 1: Do employees know and have what they need to do their job? 1 I know what is expected of me at work. 4.39 4.32 2 I receive the information I need to perform my job. 4.07 3.97 3 I have the resources I need to do my job effectively. 4.00 3.87 4 I have the technology I need to do my job efficiently. 4.16 4.06 SECTION 2: Do employees feel they are valued? 5 I am recognized for doing a good job. 3.42 3.19 6 My supervisor values me and the work I do. 3.85 3.61 7 My supervisor gives me ongoing feedback to help improve my performance. 3.29 3.05 8 I feel encouraged to have a good balance between work and personal life. 3.42 3.14 SECTION 3: Do employees feel they provide individual contributions? 9 I am encouraged to develop myself professionally. 3.45 3.18 10 I am encouraged to provide input on decisions impacting my work. 3.55 3.27 11 I am encouraged to come up with better ways of doing things. 3.57 3.37 SECTION 4: Do employees feel connected to their co-workers? 12 A spirit of cooperation and teamwork exists between me & my co-workers. 3.86 3.64 13 Knowledge & information sharing is practiced between me & my co-workers. 3.81 3.64 14 Those around me are committed to doing quality work. 4.12 4.00 SECTION 5: Do employees feel connected to their department? 15 Clear reporting structures are established within my department. 3.79 3.74 16 I receive clear information about changes made within my department. 3.33 3.24 17 I know how my department measures success. 3.27 3.10 18 I know how my work contributes to the success of my department. 3.84 3.70 19 My department demonstrates support for a diverse workforce. 4.00 3.89 20 I enjoy being part of my department. 3.96 3.73 SECTION 6: Do employees feel connected to WSU as a whole? 21 I am encouraged to improve work processes to benefit customers. 3.72 3.54 22 I receive clear information about changes made within my college/area. 3.18 2.93 23 I receive clear information about changes being made within WSU. 3.16 3.04 24 I enjoy being part of Washington State University. 4.08 3.79 25 Overall, I am satisfied at work. 3.84 3.57 106 2014 WSU Employee Engagement Survey

NOT DISCLOSED SPOKANE CAMPUS There were 46 respondents who did not identified their department, however identified themselves located on the Spokane campus with a response average for statements 1-25, of 3.76, which was higher than the WSU average of 3.72. The average for the faculty specific statements was 3.68, higher than the WSU average of 3.63. Of those who responded, 41% were faculty, 37% were civil service and 22% were administrative professionals. HIGHEST RESPONSE AVERAGE: Statements WSU Average Area Average I enjoy being part of Washington State University. 4.08 4.12 I have the technology I need to do my job efficiently. 4.16 4.17 My department demonstrates support for a diverse workforce. 4.00 4.19 Those around me are committed to doing quality work. 4.12 4.31 I know what is expected of me at work. 4.39 4.36 LOWEST RESPONSE AVERAGE: Statements WSU Average Area Average I receive clear information about changes being made within my college/area. 3.18 3.12 I feel encouraged to have a good balance between work and personal life. 3.42 3.33 I receive clear information about changes being made within WSU. 3.16 3.33 My supervisor gives me ongoing feedback to help me improve performance. 3.29 3.40 I am recognized for doing a good job. 3.42 3.41 I am encouraged to provide input on decisions impacting my work. 3.55 3.41 EMPLOYEE FEEDBACK: At the end of the survey, employees were given the opportunity to provide feedback regarding subjects not addressed in the survey. The following feedback, specifically related to employee perceptions of the workplace, was provided by respondents who identified themselves located on the Spokane campus. Communication; transparency of information Supervisory behavior; favoritism by faculty and supervisors; employee treatment Support staff in college make hiring and promoting appropriate individuals difficult Work environment within the college is poor Lack of one-on-one new employee orientation Out of date technology; time reporting Washington State University Human Resource Services 107

RESPONSE AVERAGE BREAKDOWN: WSU Not Disclosed Spokane # of Respondents 48 Overall response average for statements 1-25 3.72 3.94 Faculty Specific Response Average 3.63 4.11 FACULTY SPECIFIC SECTION: Do faculty feel they provide contributions within their faculty appointments? I have support to pursue my research opportunities. 3.61 4.00 I have input regarding my teaching opportunities and assignments. 3.77 4.00 I am encouraged to participate in mentoring activities. 3.50 4.33 SECTION 1: Do employees know and have what they need to do their job? 1 I know what is expected of me at work. 4.39 4.54 2 I receive the information I need to perform my job. 4.07 4.21 3 I have the resources I need to do my job effectively. 4.00 4.17 4 I have the technology I need to do my job efficiently. 4.16 4.38 SECTION 2: Do employees feel they are valued? 5 I am recognized for doing a good job. 3.42 3.72 6 My supervisor values me and the work I do. 3.85 4.13 7 My supervisor gives me ongoing feedback to help improve my performance. 3.29 3.68 8 I feel encouraged to have a good balance between work and personal life. 3.42 3.81 SECTION 3: Do employees feel they provide individual contributions? 9 I am encouraged to develop myself professionally. 3.45 3.85 10 I am encouraged to provide input on decisions impacting my work. 3.55 3.83 11 I am encouraged to come up with better ways of doing things. 3.57 3.88 SECTION 4: Do employees feel connected to their co-workers? 12 A spirit of cooperation and teamwork exists between me & my co-workers. 3.86 3.69 13 Knowledge & information sharing is practiced between me & my co-workers. 3.81 3.88 14 Those around me are committed to doing quality work. 4.12 3.81 SECTION 5: Do employees feel connected to their department? 15 Clear reporting structures are established within my department. 3.79 4.10 16 I receive clear information about changes made within my department. 3.33 3.65 17 I know how my department measures success. 3.27 3.50 18 I know how my work contributes to the success of my department. 3.84 4.02 19 My department demonstrates support for a diverse workforce. 4.00 4.30 20 I enjoy being part of my department. 3.96 4.10 SECTION 6: Do employees feel connected to WSU as a whole? 21 I am encouraged to improve work processes to benefit customers. 3.72 3.94 22 I receive clear information about changes made within my college/area. 3.18 3.46 23 I receive clear information about changes being made within WSU. 3.16 3.38 24 I enjoy being part of Washington State University. 4.08 4.40 25 Overall, I am satisfied at work. 3.84 4.15 108 2014 WSU Employee Engagement Survey

NOT DISCLOSED TRI CITIES CAMPUS There were 19 respondents who did not identified their department, however identified themselves located on the Tri Cities campus with a response average for statements 1-25, of 3.46, which was lower than the WSU average of 3.72. The average for the faculty specific statements was 2.78, which was lower than the WSU average of 3.63. Of those who responded, 47% were administrative professionals, 37% were civil service and 16% were faculty. HIGHEST RESPONSE AVERAGE: Statements WSU Average Area Average A spirit of cooperation and teamwork exists between me and co-workers. 3.86 3.89 I have the technology I need to do my job efficiently. 4.16 3.89 I enjoy being part of Washington State University. 4.08 3.94 I know how my work contributes to the success of my department. 3.84 3.94 I know what is expected of me at work. 4.39 4.21 Those around me are committed to doing quality work. 4.12 4.22 LOWEST RESPONSE AVERAGE: Statements WSU Average Area Average I feel encouraged to have a good balance between work and personal life. 3.42 2.56 I receive clear information about changes being made within WSU. 3.16 2.65 I receive clear information about changes being made within my college/area. 3.18 2.71 I know how my department measures success. 3.27 2.78 I receive clear information about changes being made within my department. 3.33 2.89 EMPLOYEE FEEDBACK: At the end of the survey, employees were given the opportunity to provide feedback regarding subjects not addressed in the survey. The following feedback, specifically related to employee perceptions of the workplace, was provided by respondents who identified themselves located on the WSU Tri Cities. Lack of internal advancement opportunities Washington State University Human Resource Services 109

RESPONSE AVERAGE BREAKDOWN: WSU Not Disclosed Tri Cities # of Respondents 17 Overall response average for statements 1-25 3.72 3.46 Faculty Specific Response Average 3.63 2.78 FACULTY SPECIFIC SECTION: Do faculty feel they provide contributions within their faculty appointments? I have support to pursue my research opportunities. 3.61 3.00 I have input regarding my teaching opportunities and assignments. 3.77 2.33 I am encouraged to participate in mentoring activities. 3.50 3.00 SECTION 1: Do employees know and have what they need to do their job? 1 I know what is expected of me at work. 4.39 4.21 2 I receive the information I need to perform my job. 4.07 3.79 3 I have the resources I need to do my job effectively. 4.00 3.68 4 I have the technology I need to do my job efficiently. 4.16 3.89 SECTION 2: Do employees feel they are valued? 5 I am recognized for doing a good job. 3.42 2.94 6 My supervisor values me and the work I do. 3.85 3.72 7 My supervisor gives me ongoing feedback to help improve my performance. 3.29 2.94 8 I feel encouraged to have a good balance between work and personal life. 3.42 2.56 SECTION 3: Do employees feel they provide individual contributions? 9 I am encouraged to develop myself professionally. 3.45 3.00 10 I am encouraged to provide input on decisions impacting my work. 3.55 3.11 11 I am encouraged to come up with better ways of doing things. 3.57 3.56 SECTION 4: Do employees feel connected to their co-workers? 12 A spirit of cooperation and teamwork exists between me & my co-workers. 3.86 3.89 13 Knowledge & information sharing is practiced between me & my co-workers. 3.81 3.83 14 Those around me are committed to doing quality work. 4.12 4.22 SECTION 5: Do employees feel connected to their department? 15 Clear reporting structures are established within my department. 3.79 3.59 16 I receive clear information about changes made within my department. 3.33 2.89 17 I know how my department measures success. 3.27 2.78 18 I know how my work contributes to the success of my department. 3.84 3.94 19 My department demonstrates support for a diverse workforce. 4.00 3.76 20 I enjoy being part of my department. 3.96 3.72 SECTION 6: Do employees feel connected to WSU as a whole? 21 I am encouraged to improve work processes to benefit customers. 3.72 3.61 22 I receive clear information about changes made within my college/area. 3.18 2.71 23 I receive clear information about changes being made within WSU. 3.16 2.65 24 I enjoy being part of Washington State University. 4.08 3.94 25 Overall, I am satisfied at work. 3.84 3.65 110 2014 WSU Employee Engagement Survey

NOT DISCLOSED VANCOUVER CAMPUS There were 21 respondents who did not identified their department, however identified themselves located on the Vancouver campus with a response average for statements 1-25, of 3.52, which was lower than the WSU average of 3.72. The average for the faculty specific statements was 4.04, which was higher than the WSU average of 3.63. Of those who responded, 29% were administrative professionals, 29% were civil service and 43% were faculty. HIGHEST RESPONSE AVERAGE: Statements WSU Average Area Average I know what is expected of me at work. 4.39 4.19 Those around me are committed to doing quality work. 4.12 4.20 I have input regarding my teaching opportunities and assignments. 3.77 4.22 I am encouraged to participate in mentoring activities. 3.50 4.22 I have the technology I need to do my job efficiently. 4.16 4.29 LOWEST RESPONSE AVERAGE: Statements WSU Average Area Average My supervisor gives me ongoing feedback to help me improve performance. 3.29 2.70 I feel encouraged to have a good balance between work and personal life. 3.42 2.90 I am recognized for doing a good job. 3.42 2.95 I receive clear information about changes being made within WSU. 3.16 3.00 I receive clear information about changes being made within my college/area. 3.18 3.21 EMPLOYEE FEEDBACK: At the end of the survey, employees were given the opportunity to provide feedback regarding subjects not addressed in the survey. The following feedback, specifically related to employee perceptions of the workplace, was provided by respondents who identified themselves located on the WSU Vancouver. Inequities in salaries; underpaid for job duties Out of date technology Washington State University Human Resource Services 111

RESPONSE AVERAGE BREAKDOWN: WSU Not Disclosed Vancouver # of Respondents 21 Overall response average for statements 1-25 3.72 3.52 Faculty Specific Response Average 3.63 4.04 FACULTY SPECIFIC SECTION: Do faculty feel they provide contributions within their faculty appointment? I have support to pursue my research opportunities. 3.61 3.67 I have input regarding my teaching opportunities and assignments. 3.77 4.22 I am encouraged to participate in mentoring activities. 3.50 4.22 SECTION 1: Do employees know and have what they need to do their job? 1 I know what is expected of me at work. 4.39 4.19 2 I receive the information I need to perform my job. 4.07 3.57 3 I have the resources I need to do my job effectively. 4.00 3.71 4 I have the technology I need to do my job efficiently. 4.16 4.29 SECTION 2: Do employees feel they are valued? 5 I am recognized for doing a good job. 3.42 2.95 6 My supervisor values me and the work I do. 3.85 3.40 7 My supervisor gives me ongoing feedback to help improve my performance. 3.29 2.70 8 I feel encouraged to have a good balance between work and personal life. 3.42 2.90 SECTION 3: Do employees feel they provide individual contributions? 9 I am encouraged to develop myself professionally. 3.45 3.48 10 I am encouraged to provide input on decisions impacting my work. 3.55 3.37 11 I am encouraged to come up with better ways of doing things. 3.57 3.32 SECTION 4: Do employees feel connected to their co-workers? 12 A spirit of cooperation and teamwork exists between me & my co-workers. 3.86 3.90 13 Knowledge & information sharing is practiced between me & my co-workers. 3.81 3.60 14 Those around me are committed to doing quality work. 4.12 4.20 SECTION 5: Do employees feel connected to their department? 15 Clear reporting structures are established within my department. 3.79 3.79 16 I receive clear information about changes made within my department. 3.33 3.53 17 I know how my department measures success. 3.27 3.26 18 I know how my work contributes to the success of my department. 3.84 3.43 19 My department demonstrates support for a diverse workforce. 4.00 4.00 20 I enjoy being part of my department. 3.96 3.80 SECTION 6: Do employees feel connected to WSU as a whole? 21 I am encouraged to improve work processes to benefit customers. 3.72 3.50 22 I receive clear information about changes made within my college/area. 3.18 3.21 23 I receive clear information about changes being made within WSU. 3.16 3.00 24 I enjoy being part of Washington State University. 4.08 3.52 25 Overall, I am satisfied at work. 3.84 3.43 112 2014 WSU Employee Engagement Survey