Coal-Derived Warm Syngas Purification and CO 2 Capture-Assisted Methane Production

Similar documents
Warm Syngas Clean-up Process Development: Multi-Contaminant Removal using Sorbents and Ir-Ni Tar Reforming Catalyst

Comparison of a New Warm-Gas Desulfurization Process versus Traditional Scrubbers for a Commercial IGCC Power Plant

RTI/Eastman Warm Syngas Clean-up Technology: Integration with Carbon Capture

CALCIUM LOOPING PROCESS FOR CLEAN FOSSIL FUEL CONVERSION. Shwetha Ramkumar, Robert M. Statnick, Liang-Shih Fan. Daniel P. Connell

Supercritical Water Coal Conversion with Aquifer-Based Sequestration of CO 2

Advancement of Biomass to Liquids and Hydrogen Separation Technologies Through the Utilization of Pilot-Scale Gasifiers

Pre-combustion with Physical Absorption E.R. van Selow R.W. van den Brink

Pre-Commercial Demonstration of High Efficiency, Low Cost Syngas Cleanup Technology for Chemical, Fuel, and Power Applications

UOP Selexol TM Technology Applications for CO 2 Capture

Pre-combustion with Physical Absorption

Air Products Pressure Swing Adsorption at the National Carbon Capture Center

Customizing Syngas Specifications with E-Gas Technology Gasifier

Evaluation of Hydrogen Production at Refineries in China. The new UOP SeparALL TM Process. Bart Beuckels, UOP NV

Techno-economic Optimization Potential of High Temperature Syngas Treatment in Gasification Processes

RTI Warm Syngas Cleanup Technology Demonstration

THE HOT GAS DESULFURIZATION IN A COMPACT TWO BEDS SYSTEM INTEGRATED WITH COAL GASIFICATION AND FISHER-TROPSCH SYSTEM

Integrated processes for converting coal to chemicals and fuels. Maninder Jit Singh Haldor Topsøe

Thermodynamic performance of IGCC with oxycombustion

Compact Gasification and Synthesis process for Transport Fuels

Hot gas cleaning for biomass gasification for clean gas production

CO 2 adsorption using CaO and its potential integration with hydrogen production from biomass gasification

Pre combustion CO 2 capture

Pilot Scale Production of Mixed Alcohols from Wood. Supplementary Information

Valorisation of Synthesis Gas from Biomass - the Piteå DME pilot. Esben Lauge Sørensen, May 2009

Simultaneous Removal of SO 2 and CO 2 From Flue Gases at Large Coal-Fired Stationary Sources

Lurgi s MPG Gasification plus Rectisol Gas Purification Advanced Process Combination for Reliable Syngas Production

Towards 2 nd generation of IGCC plants Nuon Magnum multi-fuel power plant Robert de Kler, May 2009

Thrust 4: Catalytic Conversion of Syn Gas

Analysis of Exergy and Energy of Gasifier Systems for Coal-to-Fuel

Methanol Production by Gasification of Heavy Residues

Development of the Highly Durable COS Hydrolysis Catalyst for IGCC Gas Clean-up System

Paolo Chiesa. Politecnico di Milano. Tom Kreutz*, Bob Williams. Princeton University

Progress on CO 2 Capture Pilot Plant at RIST

Successful Sulfur Control & Hydrogen Purification at Saras World-Scale IGCC Plant

The methanol synthesis. Antal Tungler Emeritus professzor MTA Centre for Energy Research 2017

2013 Instituto Petroquímico Argentino (IPA) Conference 09 October 2013 Buenos Aires, Argentina

Hydrogen Separation Membrane Applications

Simulation of methanol synthesis from syngas obtained through biomass gasification using Aspen Plus

Molten Salt Reactors in Gasification and Gas Purification

Emerging Technologies for the Production of Ultraclean IGCC Syngas

Optimal design of coal gasifiers in combination with sour shift

Gasification & Water Nexus

Processes to Recover and Purify

Development and application of high temperature CO 2 sorbents

Noell Entrained-Flow Gasification

Production and purification of hydrogen-methane mixtures utilized in internal combustion engines

Cleaning biomass generated syngas: is biochar a cheaper alternative to expensive catalysts? Ajay Kumar Oklahoma State University

Power Generation and Utility Fuels Group. Reynolds Frimpong Andy Placido Director: Kunlei Liu

Ronald L. Schoff Parsons Corporation George Booras Electric Power Research Institute

Coupling gasification and metallurgical applications

Advanced Membrane Reactors for Carbon-Free Fossil Fuel Conversion

OPTIMIZATION OF THE SHIFT CONVERSION UNIT IN A GASIFICATION PLANT

CuO-based Al 2 O 3 -, MgAl 2 O 4 - or CeO 2 -supported oxygen carriers for chemical looping with oxygen uncoupling: synthesis and performance

ENE HELSINKI UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY SULPHUR #2

2014 Gasification Technologies Conference Washington, DC Oct UOP LLC. All rights reserved.

Chemical Looping Gasification Sulfur By-Product

EFFECT OF GAS-PHASE ALKALI ON TAR REFORMING CATALYST

Precombustion capture. Professor Dianne Wiley School of Chemical Engineering, UNSW Australia

Mk Plus The Next Generation Lurgi FBDB Gasification. Leipzig, 22/05/2012 Dr. Henrik Timmermann

Study on catalytic pyrolysis and efficient gasification of cellulose as biomass samples

An Opportunity for Methanol; the Production Starting from Coal

Research and Development Initiatives of WRI

with Physical Absorption

CANSOLV SO2 Scrubbing System - 10 Years of Reliable Operation Integration with SRU Tail Gas Incineration

High Capcity Hydrotalcites

Dr. Brian F. Towler Presented by Dr. David Bell University of Wyoming Laramie WY, USA

Warm Syngas Clean-up Processes Applied in Synthetic Natural Gas (SNG) Production with Coal and Biomass

Cansolv Technologies Inc. Alberta NOx and SOx Control Technologies Symposium April 9, Rick Birnbaum

TRONDHEIM CCS CONFERENCE

Pre-Combustion Technology for Coal-fired Power Plants

The Rectisol Process. Lurgi s leading technology for purification and conditioning of synthesis gas

History and Operating Results of a Coal Gasification Pilot Plant in Korea

H 2 Production from Biomass Feedstocks Utilising a Spout-Fluidised Bed Reactor

Gasification of an Indonesian subbituminous coal in a pilot-scale coal gasification system

1. Process Description:

GTI Gasification and Gas Processing R&D Program

Development status of the EAGLE Gasification Pilot Plant

Performance Review of CASTOR Pilot Plant at Esbjerg

Succeed at Removing Metals and Other Contaminants from Water

Focus on Gasification in the Western U.S.

CO 2 Capture Technologies An Overview

MOLECULAR GATE TECHNOLOGY FOR (SMALLER SCALE) LNG PRETREATMENT

The Production of Syngas Via High Temperature Electrolysis and Biomass Gasification

We accept the challenge!

VESTA a Novel SNG Technology

Austro Energy Systems Int. AG. Gas reformer AES3000

Reactor design and optimization V. Spallina, F. Gallucci, M.C. Romano, P. Chiesa, G. Lozza, M. van Sint Annaland

Flowsheet Modelling of Biomass Steam Gasification System with CO 2 Capture for Hydrogen Production

Abstract Process Economics Program Report 180B CARBON CAPTURE FROM COAL FIRED POWER GENERATION (DECEMBER 2008 REPUBLISHED MARCH 2009)

Module 4 : Hydrogen gas. Lecture 29 : Hydrogen gas

Feeding CO 2 from air into solid oxide electrolyzer cells

A new HP version of Lurgi s FBDBTM gasifier is bringing more value to clients

The Cost of Mercury Removal in an IGCC Plant

Novel Application of Bio-char as a Catalyst in the Low Temperature SRC-deNO x Process

GASIFICATION: gas cleaning and gas conditioning

FUEL PROCESSING FOR PEM FUEL CELLS

Pyrolysis and Gasification

On the Challenges of Coal Gasification Based Syngas Conversion Systems

Exhaust gas treatment technologies for pollutant emission abatement from fossil fuel power plants

PROCESS ECONOMICS PROGRAM. Report No by NICK KORENS ROBERT W. VAN SCOY. January private report by the PARK, CALIFORNIA

Transcription:

Coal-Derived Warm Syngas Purification and CO 2 Capture-Assisted Methane Production Robert Dagle 1, David L. King 1, Xiaohong Shari Li 1, Rong Xing 1, Kurt Spies 1, Yunhua Zhu 1, and Beau Braunberger 2 1. Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, WA 2. Western Research Institute, Laramie, WY Clean Coal Symposium 2014 August 21, 2014 1

Outline Warm syngas cleanup CO 2 sorbent material development Sorbent integration with CO methanation reaction Multi-unit process demonstration 2

Coal Gasification for Fuels & Chemicals Coal ASU H 2 O Gasifier syngas WGS Syngas cleanup Synthesis, H 2 production Slag Ash, particulates H 2 S, COS, Cl, As, The order of wgs and syngas cleanup depends upon gasifier type whether water quench is employed end use application 3

Driving Force For Warm Gas Cleanup Current approaches use physical adsorption solvents to remove sulfur and other contaminants Selexol -5 to 25 o C Outlet sulfur content 5 ppmv Moderate CO 2 slip Rectisol -30 to -70 o C Outlet sulfur < 100 ppb Complete CO 2 removal Both processes are inefficient due to the requirement to cool the syngas for purification and subsequent re-heat for synthesis or fuel cell use 4

Alternatives to Treating Gasifier Effluent: Water Quench 5 Quench system integrated with gasifier Water used to quench the slag Partial quench cools syngas to ~900 o C Allows use of sensible heat below 900 o C for high P steam generation Impurity concentrations in syngas significantly higher than in full quench Full quench produces syngas around 300 o C Lower efficiency due to loss of sensible heat Particulates, majority of alkali, chlorides, metals, NH 3 removed by water quench Facilitates subsequent wgs (generally sour shift) and increase in H 2 concentration of syngas Remaining impurities requiring cleanup: H 2 S, COS, trace quantities of NH 3, As, HCl Wastewater can be recycled in slurry-fed process

Typical Content of Raw Syngas Produced by Coal Gasification Without Full Water Quench Gas component Concentration (vol %) CO 30-60 H 2 25-30 CO 2 5-15 H 2 O 2-30 CH 4 0-5 H 2 S 0.2-1 COS 0-0.1 HCN + NH 3 0-0.3 Impurity HCl K Na AsH 3 PH 3 Hg Sb Se Pb Cd ppmv 160 500 320 0.6 1.9 0.03 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.01 * Tars may also be present depending on gasifier type and mode of operation. 6

Warm Gas Cleanup Strategies Chloride removal Sulfur (H 2 S and COS) removal Trace contaminant removal 7

Warm Gas Cleanup Approach (With Water Quench) For Generation of Syngas for Chemical Synthesis Slag Metal sorbents for As, P, Sb, Se, HCl and S deep removal Quench gasifier Wastewater containing particulates, chloride, alkali, non-volatile metals, NH 3 Regenerable and polishing ZnO sorbents for sulfur removal to <0.1 ppm HCl polishing sorbents (Na 2 CO 3 -based) Syngas with sulfur and trace other impurities Sour shift CoMoS/Al 2 O 3 (Optional) Sweet low T shift Sweet high T shift (optional) Solid Oxide Fuel Cell (H 2, CO, CO 2 ) H 2 : PEM Fuel Cell (H 2, CO 2 ) Synthesis CH 3 OH, CH 4, higher alcohols,. Goal: ppb level impurities CO 2 removal (as needed) 20

HCl Removal - Na 2 CO 3 Feed: 50% H 2 O, 13% CO, 10% CO 2, 20% H 2, 7% CH 4, 100 ppm HCl 80,000 hr -1, 1 atm Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2013, 52, 8125-8138 450 o C 9 Optimal Sorbent Capacity 450-500 o C

H 2 S Removal Thermodynamic Calculation 25 Less Than 50 ppb H 2 S Can Be Achieved Thermodynamically by ZnO Absorbent at 300 o C

H 2 S Removal (in Syngas) with ZnO: Temperature Effect 3000 ppm H 2 S in Syngas (38.4% CO, 38.4% H2, 3.2% N2, 20% H2O), 12,000 hr -1 ; ZnO Sorbent G-72D provided by Sud Chemie, contains small amount Al 2 O 3 x 450 o C optimal temperature 11 No detectable sulfur slip (< 40 ppb)

H 2 S Removal (in Syngas) with ZnO: Cycling Stability Evaluations 3000 ppm H 2 S in Syngas (38.4% CO, 38.4% H2, 3.2% N2, 20% H2O), 12,000 hr -1 ; ZnO Sorbent G-72D provided by Sud Chemie, contains small amount Al 2 O 3 x Degradation of sorbent capacity after first couple cycles 12 5-10 ppm slip observed after first cycle

PH 3 and AsH 3 Removal From Warm Syngas by 28 wt.% Ni-Cu/SBA-16 Adsorbent (300 o C) PH 3 AsH 3 33

Summary of Warm Inorganic Contaminant Cleanup 14 HCl sorption demonstrated with NaCO 3 Sulfur removal Fresh ZnO is capable of achieving ppb levels of H 2 S slip, in agreement with thermodynamics Regenerated ZnO does not achieve thermodynamically predicted levels of H 2 S slip Typical slip is 5-10 ppm H 2 S Higher T operation (450 o C) maximizes capacity of regenerated ZnO Cause for difference in performance between fresh and regenerated ZnO is unclear Sintering of ZnO crystals occurs Change in surface properties of ZnO may be responsible A regenerated bed (450 o C) followed by a fresh ZnO polishing bed (300 o C) is predicted to provide a solution to bringing H 2 S slip to ppb levels As, P sorption demonstrated with CuNi sorbent

Warm CO 2 Capture MgO-Based Double Salts: Facilitation by Molten Salts CO 2 -Sorption Integrated with Catalytic Methanation Reaction 15

LiNaK-CO 3 promoted MgO and MgO based double salt absorbents for CO 2 removal at 300-500C Motivation and Background Capture CO 2 from fossil fuel reforming/gasification Eliminate a cooling/heating treatment of the gas stream, and improve the thermal efficiency Facilitate equilibrium-restricted processes, e.g. water-gas-shift reaction, methane synthesis. MgO and MgO based double salts(ds) Thermodynamics predicts MgO to be effective absorbent below 380 C: MMM + CO 2 (g) MMMO 3 MgO double salt carbonation temperature is increased up to 520 C. MMM + NN 2 CO 3 + CO 2 (g) MMMM 2 (CO 3 ) 2 However, the reactions are limited by slow kinetics

Previous studies have found that the presence of NaNO 3 significantly enhances the ability of MgO to capture CO 2 Li2CO3-Na2CO3 -K2CO3 Phase Diagram LiNaKCO 3 Li 2 CO 3, 32.2wt% Na 2 CO 3 : 33.3wt% K 2 CO 3 : 34.5 wt% Melting point: 390C CO 2 absorption test of MgO and MgO +NaNO 3 during heating in CO 2 1 NaNO 3 is a strong oxidizing agent. Thus, the application of the NaNO 3 promoted adsorbents is limited. Objective: Replace NaNO 3 with non oxidizing molten salts such as molten carbonates. Adv. Mater. Interfaces, 2014, 1, 1400030 Adjusting the composition of the salt controls the temperature at which the molten phase forms. Recently, our results indicate that the presence of Li-Na-K-CO 3 can also significantly improve the ability of MgO and MgO based double salt to capture CO 2.

LiNaK-CO 3 Promoted MgO Absorbents TGA results of 80% MgO + 20% Li-Na-K-CO3 (350C calcined ) 100% CO 2, 25C-425C (5C/min) MgO+CO 2 (g) MgCO 3 Cyclic test: 360C (99 min in CO 2 ) 390C (81min in N 2 ) TG/% Temp. / C 160 150 140 130 120 110 100 90 Mass Change: 58.58 % 0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 Time /min [1] [1] 400 350 300 250 200 150 100 50 0 Blue: 80% MgO, 20% LiNaKCO3 Green: MgO Absorption rate: 4.5 mmol/g/min was observed at 360-370C High stable cyclic capacity (13mmol/g) was achieved (~50 wt.%)

LiNaK-CO3 Promoted MgO-Na 2 CO 3 Double Salt Absorbents Created with NETZSCH Proteus software MgO+Na 2 CO 3 +CO 2 (g) MgNa 2 (CO 3 ) 2 TGA cyclic test results of 44% MgO, 44% Na 2 CO 3,12% LiNaK-CO 3 400C 100% PSW Red: 390C CO2,450C air Green: 360C CO2, 400C air TG/% Temp. / C TG /% Temp. / C 125 Mass Change: -21.46 % [1] Mass Change: 13.75 % [1] 400 120 [2] [1] 400 120 350 300 115 [1] 350 300 115 110 105 250 200 150 100 110 105 250 200 150 100 0 200 400 600 800 1000 Time /min Main 2013-10-07 11:59 User: TGA 50 0 100 0 200 400 600 800 1000 Time /min Main 2014-02-22 18:20 User: TGA [2] 100 50 0 Created with NETZSCH Proteus software Molten carbonate promoted MgO-Na 2 CO 3 absorbents have CO 2 capacity of 2.5-4.5 mmol/g (~15-20 wt.%). Regeneration can be easily carried out both through PSA and TSA.

Triple phase boundaries (TPB) are required for the molten salt promoted CO 2 +MgO reaction process Absorption performance and BET surface area of as a function of LiKNa-CO3 concentration Illustration diagrams for the interfacial interactions of molten(a) and pre-molten(b) salt promoted gas-solid reaction process (A) (B)

LiNaK-CO 3 Promoted MgO and MgO Based Double Salt Absorbents LiNaK-CO 3 promoted Absorb(Wt. %) Operation temperature range, C Cycling capacity Operation condition Absorption Desorption mmol/g 20%LiNaK- CO 3 @MgO 300-360 375-385 360C-390C combined swing 12-13 12%LiNaK- CO 3 @44%MgO/ 44% Na 2 CO 3 300-400 400-475 400C pressure swing 3.5--4.5 360-450C temperature swing 2.5-4.5 390-450C combined swing 3.4-4.5 By adjusting the absorbent s composition and chosen different of molten salts, a series of absorbents which can be used for different applications were developed.

CO 2 -Sorption Enhanced Methanation (Methanation Reaction + CO 2 Capture) 15% H 2 O, 40% H 2, 32% CO, 3.0% CH 4, 22% CO 2,3.0% N 2 1 bar; 360 0 C; 1800 hr -1 reaction, 46 hr -1 sorption CO methanation: CO + 3 H 2 CH 4 + H 2O Methanation-only 15% Ni/MgAl 2 O 4 catalyst WGS: CO + H + 2O CO2 H 2 Methanation + CO 2 Capture 22 CO 2 -sorption enables enhanced selectivity to methane CO 2 sorbent capacity = 24 wt.%

CO 2 -Sorption Enhanced Methanation Pressure Effect 15% H 2 O, 40% H 2, 32% CO, 3.0% CH 4, 22% CO 2, 3.0% N 2 360 0 C; 1800 hr -1 reaction, 46 hr -1 sorption Pressurized operation enhances CO 2 sorption Enabling 99% CH 4 Yield (gas phase) 23

CO 2 Sorption Conclusions NaNO 3 and molten carbonate can promote MgO and MgObased double salts to capture CO 2 with a high cycling capacity. Stable cycling CO 2 capacity up to 13mmol/g was achieved MgO and MgO based double salts can capture CO 2 with the presence of both molten and pre-molten salts. A higher adsorption rate was observed at the temperature close to melting point. By adjusting the adsorbent s composition and chosen different of molten salts, a series of absorbents which can be used for different applications were developed. Non-corrosive sorbent was successfully integrated with catalytic methanation

Process Demonstration Multi-Unit Cleanup Process Train Demonstrated with water quenched coal-derived syngas obtained from the Western Research Institute 25

Process Flow Diagram Disposable sorbents for HCl and trace contaminant removal (2 separate beds) 2 Regenerable bulk ZnO beds + ZnO sulfur polishing unit Wyoming coal synthesis gas R1 HCL Removal Na 2 CO 3 450 C R2A Desulfurization ZnO 450 C R2B Desulfurization ZnO 450 C Slip Stream Clean, warm, CH 4 -rich, CO 2 -lean syngas R3 Trace Metal Polish ZnO & CuNi/C 300 C R4 Tar Reformer Ir/MgAl 2 O 4 850 C R5A CO 2 Capture & SNG Double Salt & Ni/MgAl 2 O 4 350 C/450 C Tar reformer tars present because low T gasifier operation Clean, warm H 2 -rich syngas R6 LT-WGS CuZn-Al 2 O 3 235 C R5B CO 2 Capture & SNG Double Salt & Ni/MgAl 2 O 4 350 C/450 C 2 Regenerable CO 2 -sorption enhanced methanation units demonstrate w/ slip stream 26 WGS bed used for warm cleanup demonstration

Demonstration Results for Warm Cleanup WRI Gasifier-Derived Syngas ~1 SLPM Raw Syngas Feed (Water Quenched) 100 WGS Catalyst Performance Slight deactivation of WGS catalytic performance observed Ppm levels of sulfur found on front end of spent WGS catalyst Vast majority of contaminants removed from syngas (99% S removed) CO Conversion (%) 75 50 25 0 CO Conversion Equilibrium CO Conversion 0 25 50 75 100 Time-On-Stream (hrs) 27 CO Conversion (%) 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 WGS Catalyst Performance (2013) 0 5 10 15 20 25 Time-On-Stream (hrs) Considerable progress achieved from 2013 demonstration where significant deactivation occurred!

Demonstration Results CO 2 -Sorption Enhanced Methanation Reactors (2 Beds) Alternating/Regenerable Beds: 100 90 A B A CO Conversion Sorption 350 o C Desorption 450 o C (N 2 ) 80 70 CO 2 Sorbent Not Yet Activated CH 4 Selectivity Deactviation 60 % 50 40 28 30 20 10 0 CO Conv (%) CH4 Sel (%) CO2 Sel (%) EQ CO2 Sel (%) EQ CH4 Sel (%) CO 2 Selectivity 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 Time-On-Stream (hrs) Mixed results CO 2 sorption and methanation reaction occurring simultaneously prior to gradual deactivation of sorbent

Summary Warm gas cleanup is feasible and provides efficiency gains relative to ambient or sub-ambient liquid phase capture of impurities Increased benefit of warm gas cleanup will derive from continued development of warm CO 2 capture technology in conjunction with syngas cleanup Absorption of CO 2 by Na 2 CO 3 -MgO (forming double salt) is facilitated by molten salt A regenerable CO 2 capacity of ~20 wt.% is achieved with double salts using temperature swing (350 o C sorption/450 o C desorption) Dissolution of some MgO into the molten salt, followed by reaction of CO 2 at the triple phase boundary, provides basis for CO 2 capture process Combining CO 2 capture with methanation in a single bed was demonstrated to yield 99+% (10 bar, 350 o C) Multi-contaminant removal process train was demonstrated for 100 hours with ~ 1 SLPM Wyoming coal-derived syngas (WRI-provided) 29

Acknowledgments Financial support by the US DOE Office of Fossil Energy (NETL), the State of Wyoming, and PNNL internal research funds is gratefully acknowledged Some of this work involves a collaboration with the National Energy Technology Laboratory (NETL), the Center For Clean Energy Engineering (University of Connecticut), and the Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS) A portion of this work was carried out in the Environmental Molecular Sciences Laboratory (EMSL) at PNNL, a US DOE Office of Science user facility

31 Questions?

32 Extra Slides

Alternatives to Treating Gasifier Effluent Radiant cooler Only radiant heat transfer cools the syngas Higher CO concentration in product gas Moisture content of syngas is low Somewhat prone to fouling Difficulties in scaling Favored for industrial gas production, CO production, IGCC where H 2 purity not required to be high (no CO 2 capture) IGCC: sulfur concentration <20ppmv Greater energy efficiency, but higher CAPEX Hot gas scrubber required to remove particulates, chlorides 33

28.8 wt.% Ni-Cu/SBA-16 Functions Effectively as PH 3 and AsH 3 Absorbent Ni + AsH 3 =NiAs + 1.5 H 2 (127 wt%) Kp = 8.85 x 10 11 3Cu + AsH 3 = Cu 3 As + 1.5H 2 (39 wt%) Kp = 2.45 x 10 7 Ni + 2PH 3 = NiP 2 + 3 H 2 (106 wt%) Kp = 1.01 x 10 14 Cu + PH 3 = Cu 3 P + 1.5 H 2 (16 wt%) Kp = 5.6 x 10 14 35

H 2 S Removal (in Syngas) with ZnO COS Sorption 80 1000 ppm COS in N2 (dry) or 80% N2, 20% H2O (wet); 12,000 hr -1 ; ZnO Sorbent G-72E provided by Sud Chemie, contains small amount Al 2 O 3 x 70 60 Sulfur Concentration, PPM 50 40 30 20 COS dry 200 C COS dry 450 C COS wet 450 C H2S, COS wet 450 C Theoretical Maximum 10 0 0 0.05 0.1 0.15 0.2 0.25 0.3 0.35 0.4 0.45 0.5 Sulfur fed, g S/g adsorbent Wet COS sorption favorable (COS+H 2 O H 2 S + CO 2 ) 35 Dry COS sorption still feasible at warm temperatures (e.g., 450 o C vs. 200 o C)

Characterization of Fresh and Regenerated ZnO Sorbents Regenerated ZnO ZnS Fresh ZnO Crystal Size by XRD, nm BET surface area, m 2 /g Pore volume, cm 3 /g Pore size, nm Fresh ZnO 15 37.9 0.24 26 Regenerated ZnO 50 6.7 0.19 114 28

Surface Adsorption Can Exceed Bulk Thermodynamic Performance Ni + H 2 S Ni 2 S (surface) + H 2 H 2 S (ppm) in H 2 <5 ppb H 2 S in feed gas can be achieved at 350 o C and lower J.G. McCarty and H. Wise, J. Chem. Phys. 1980, 72(12), 6332. Challenge: utilize this concept while developing a regenerable adsorbent 977 727 560 441 352 282 T, o C 227 Initial work was carried out for sulfur removal, later extended to other impurities 37

NaNO 3 is found to have a key impact on the performance * 3.4 mmol CO 2 /g * Zhang, K., Li, X. S., Duan, Y., Singh, P., King, D. L. and Li, L. (2013). Roles of double salt formation and NaNO 3 in Na 2 CO 3 -promoted MgO sorbent for intermediate temperature CO 2 removal. Int. J. Greenhouse. Gas Control 12:351-358

Comparative thermodynamics shows increased stability of double salt The formation for Na 2 Mg(CO 3 ) 2 shifts the equilibrium towards higher temperature and enables regenerable CO 2 uptake at 400 C through PSA

TGA measurement of CO 2 uptake over MgO + NaNO 3 shows initiation of absorption on melting of nitrate salt* CO 2 absorption on MgO+NaNO 3 confirms MgCO 3 formation contributes to the high uptake observed in 1 st peak during ramping CO 2. The absorption stops at 380-400 C and desorption starts at higher temperature. This indicates the loss of high initial peak is due to high absorption temperature. * CO 2 uptake on alkaline earth oxides catalyzed by nitrate salt is described in one of our manuscripts in preparation

LiNaK-CO3 Promoted Dolomite Absorbents MgO+CaCO 3 +CO 2 (g) MgCa(CO 3 ) 2 TGA cyclic results of 80% dolomite, 20% LiNaK-CO 3 360C 100% CO 2-400 o C 100% N 2, CO2 capacity, wt% 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 Dolomite Dolomite + 20% Li- Na-K CO3 0 5 10 Cycles Wt % 130 120 110 100 90 80 0 10 20 30 40 50 Time, hrs CO 2 capacity of molten carbonate promoted dolomite absorbents increased from 5% to 21% after 24 carbonationdecomposition cycles, indicating a self-activating process

In-situ XRD data of Na-Mg double salt absorbent with NaNO 3 MgCO 3 is formed during 1 st cycle, and double salt during the 1 st and subsequent cycles. NaNO 3 is not observed as it melts under absorption condition and becomes undectable by X-ray.

What is the role of NaNO 3 in facilitating CO 2 Capture by MgO and MgO-Based Double Salts? MgO (and Na 2 CO 3 ) are partially dissolved in molten NaNO 3 and dissociate into their ionic components Dissolved O 2- ions react with CO 2 to form CO 3 2- MgCO 3 or Na 2 Mg(CO 3 ) 2 precipitate when solubility limit is reached CO 2 is likely first adsorbed on MgO and interacts with O 2- at the triple phase boundary

Proposed CO 2 capture facilitated by nitrate salt at triple phase boundary Phase Transfer Catalysis

Cycling 40% H 2, 32% CO, 3.0% CH 4, 22% CO 2,3.0% N 2, (15% H 2 O) 1 bar; 360 0 C; 1800 hr -1 reaction, 46 hr -1 sorption Temperature Sensitivity CO 2 -sorption enhanced methanation 360C CO 2 -desorption 450C (1 hr) 45

XRD for R5A (A) and R5B (B) after integrated testing Carbonated Regenerated