UIC Program & Natural Gas Storage

Similar documents
Railroad Commission. Class II Underground Injection Control Program Aquifer Exemption Project. February 12, 2018

Tennessee Underground Injection Control Program Overview

Regulation of In Situ Mining in Texas

Geologic Sequestration of Carbon Dioxide under the Safe Drinking Water Act s Underground Injection Control Program

UNDERGROUND INJECTION AND SEQUESTRATION AND UNDERGROUND SOURCES OF DRINKING WATER (PROTECTING A VALUABLE RESOURCE)

Implementation of Underground Injection Control Program Regulations for Class V Shallow Disposal Systems

Class III In Situ Uranium Injection Wells and Aquifer Exemptions in Texas: Multiple Levels of Permitting Protection for USDW Protection

Geologic Sequestration Rules: A Multi-Stakeholder Perspective

DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY OIL, GAS, AND MINERALS DIVISION OIL AND GAS OPERATIONS. Filed with the Secretary of State on

This document also includes proposed permit requirements, including response actions, when excursions occur.

Aquifer Exemptions. Ground Water Protection Council Conference 2015 UIC Annual Conference Austin, TX February 9-11

STATE OF ARKANSAS ARKANSAS POLLUTION CONTROL AND ECOLOGY. REGULATION NO. 17 Effective May 4, 1989 Arkansas Underground Injection Control Code

A Technical Assessment of Protection of Underground Sources of Drinking Water under the UIC Rule and Aquifer Exemption Program

RECENT CHANGES TO LOUISIANA S UNDERGROUND INJECTION CONTROL PROGRAM. By: Marjorie A. McKeithen and Brett S. Venn

Bob Van Voorhees Carbon Sequestration Council. GWPCUICMeeting Tulsa, Oklahoma February 12, 2018

EPA s Underground Injection Control Program Overview. Solid Waste Advisory Committee Meeting June 5, 2014

Groundwater Fundamentals

Natural Gas Extraction. Key Environmental Issues in US EPA Region 2 May 29, 2014

Texas Commission on Environmental Quality

NAVAJO NATION UNDERGROUND INJECTION CONTROL REGULATIONS

REVIEW OF THE AQUIFER EXEMPTION PROCESS, HISTORY AND IMPLEMENTATION RELATED TO GROUNDWATER PROTECTION AND USE

Injection Wells. An injection well is a vertical pipe in the ground into which water, other liquids, or gases are

CONCENTRATE MANAGEMENT ISSUES: GENERAL & A FOCUS ON DEEP WELL INJECTION. Mike Mickley. P.E., Ph.D. Mickley & Associates Boulder, CO

Geological Sequestration of Carbon Dioxide

Client Alert. An Overview of EPA's New Rules Regulating the Underground Injection of Carbon Dioxide

EXAMINER S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION STATEMENT OF THE CASE

The Critical Link between Aquifer Exemptions and the Sustainability of Water Resources as Part of Unconventional Resource Development

Safety and Monitoring of CO 2 Storage Projects

Everything You Always Wanted to Know About Class I Injection Wells in Texas

Summary of Issues Strategies Benefits & Costs Key Uncertainties Additional Resources

Understanding The Class II Underground Injection Control Application Process In Colorado To Comply Cost-Effectively

UIC Class I Program Priorities

Carbon Sequestration and Water: A Department of Energy Perspective

Suffolk County Highway Superintendents Association

An Introduction to Salt Caverns & Their Use for Disposal of Oil Field Wastes

California Well Stimulation Treatment Regulations

DRINKING WATER. EPA Needs to Collect Information and Consistently Conduct Activities to Protect Underground Sources of Drinking Water

Oil and Gas Monitoring. November 2, 2016 GRA Meeting John Borkovich, P.G. Groundwater Monitoring Section Chief

Detail on Concentrate Handling and Disposal Options

40 CFR - Code of Federal Regulations - Title 40: Protection of Environment

Recent Legislative Changes Affecting the Texas Class V Injection Well Program

Welcome to Management of E&P Wastes Under RCRA

Criteria for mapping brackish groundwater

How do States Define Usable Quality Groundwater?

FEDERAL ROLE IN REGULATING HYDRAULIC FRACTURING

And Now for Something Completely Different: Unusual Class V Wells in Texas

SUBCHAPTER 8. ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS FOR UNDERGROUND INJECTION CONTROL (UIC) PROGRAM

TITLE 252. DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY CHAPTER 652. UNDERGROUND INJECTION CONTROL

S OLID W ASTE CHALLENGE TO EPA REGULATION CLASSIFYING CERTAIN CO 2 EMISSIONS AS SOLID WASTE

Proposed Rule Health and Environmental Protection Standards for Uranium and Thorium Mill Tailings 40 CFR 192

SUBCHAPTER 8. This is a courtesy copy of this rule. All of the Department s rules are compiled in Title 7 of the New Jersey Administrative Code.

Growing Interest in Beneficial Use of Produced Water

No An act relating to hydraulic fracturing wells for natural gas and oil production. (H.464)

Underground Gas Storage Regulatory Considerations

Department of Conservation Division of Oil, Gas, and Geothermal Resources Bill Bartling Inland District Deputy

What to do with CO 2 : The Knowns and Unknowns of Geologic Sequestration and CO 2 EOR in Greenhouse Gas Context

Federal Updates. Michael Moore Vice President of Business Development and External Affairs Blue Source LLC

Class V Injection Wells: Back to the Future

Impact of EPA ASR Letter on Florida s ASR Facilities

Research into the Characterization of Brackish Water and Disposal of Desalination Reject Water in Saline Aquifers and Depleted Oil and Gas Reservoirs

Research into the Characterization of Brackish Water and Disposal of Desalination Reject Water in Saline Aquifers and Depleted Oil and Gas Reservoirs

DEEP INJECTION WELL CONSTRUCTION AND OPERATION

January 2017 Conducted by the

Review of Existing Injection Well Permit Regulations and Expectations of Future Geologic Sequestration CO 2 Regulations with Monitoring Conditions

CO 2 Geological Storage: Research, Development and Deployment (RD&D) Issues

Desalination Concentrate Management Policy for the Arid West

Potential Relationships Between Hydraulic Fracturing and Drinking Water Resources

Permit Number: 1900B Expiration Date: July 15, 2021

Geologic Sequestration. Regulatory and Legislative Updates

Colorado s Groundwater Protection Program

NGWA INFORMATION BRIEF

Underground Natural Gas Storage Course No. PT0131 PDH: 2

Challenges in the Transition from of CO 2 -EOR to CCS

DO Not D~$ty~bute. VWRR~ OFFfC-S copy. DO NOTReMOVe

URANIUM AND URANIUM PROGENY IN GROUNDWATER ASSOCIATED WITH URANIUM ORE BEARING FORMATIONS

RAILROAD COMMISSION OF TEXAS OIL & GAS DIVISION

CO 2 Geological Storage Principles, Applicability in Canada, and Challenges

GEOLOGIC CARBON STORAGE: UNDERSTANDING THE RULES OF THE UNDERGROUND

Regulatory Framework for Natural Gas Storage in Pennsylvania and Tariff Development for Natural Gas Storage. May 14, 2008

Slurry Injection Technology

PHMSA Requirements for Underground Storage of Natural Gas

CO 2 CHALLENGES AND OPPORTUNITIES IN WESTERN CANADA

ATTACHMENT B Technical Comments of the Texas Carbon Capture and Storage Association In Response to EPA s Proposed Rule: Federal Requirements Under the

Underground Natural Gas Storage Safety Regulation. Mary L. McDaniel, P.E. Baker Engineering and Risk Consultants, Inc Oakwell Court Suite 100

Dear Director Zehringer and Chief Simmers,

Groundwater Quality: The Issues, Remedies and Strategies

Underground Natural Gas Storage: Facts & Figures

November 2017 Conducted by the

Understanding Mechanical Integrity Testing and Underground Gas Storage: The Key to Success

CURIS RESOURCES (ARIZONA) INC. APPLICATION TO AMEND UIC PERMIT NO. AZ ATTACHMENT A AREA OF REVIEW SWVP

Beneficial Use of Produced Water: A Case Study of Projects in Colorado and Wyoming

Hydraulic Fracturing: Selected Legal Issues

Proposed New 18 CFR Part Hydraulic Fracturing in Shale and Other Formations:

Deep Saline Formations: The Largest Potential Volumes for Geological Storage of CO 2

POTENTIAL FOR GEOLOGICAL CARBON SEQUESTRATION USING DEEP SALINE AQUIFERS IN THE ILLINOIS BASIN

Re: Contamination of Protected Underground Sources of Drinking Water; Request for Enforcement Action

Memorandum July Task Force on Ensuring Stable Natural Gas Markets BPC Staff Lourdes Long Water Impacts Associated with Shale Gas Development

Tribal Lands and Environment: A National Forum on Solid Waste, Emergency Response, Contaminated Sites

Schlumberger WATER SERVICES. Schlumberger Water Services. Solutions for Water Exploration and Sustainable Supply

Compressed Air Energy Storage (CAES) Act KCC Rule Development

Transcription:

UIC Program & Natural Gas Storage Bob Van Voorhees Bryan Cave LLP GWPC UIC Conference February 21-23, 2017 Austin, Texas 1

Disclaimers This presentation represents the personal views of the presenter and does not represent the views of any Bryan Cave LLP client or any organization represented by the presented. The information contained in this presentation is not intended to provide legal advice or to reflect conclusions of law based on a complete analysis of the statutes and regulations of the underground injection control program. This presentation was prompted by informal discussions at previous GWPC conferences indicating that state agencies have taken varying approaches to the regulation of underground injection associated with natural gas storage. 2

Underground Injection Associated with Natural Gas Storage Under the Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA) underground injection means the subsurface emplacement of fluids by well injection. 42 USC 300h(d)(1)(A) The SDWA excludes the underground injection of natural gas for purposes of storage from the definition of underground injection. 42 USC 300h(d)(1)(B)(i) Yet other types of underground injection associated with underground natural gas storage may fall under the Underground Injection Control (UIC) Program. This presentation addresses the other types of injection. 3

Potential Scenarios for Injection Wells Associated with Cavern Storage Storage cavern creation (typically in salt domes or beds) Disposal of solution from storage cavern creation by injection into geologic formations Injection of brine fluid into storage cavern for Pressure maintenance during production and storage cycling Stabilization during abandonment Fluids injected for pressure maintenance or stabilization could be sourced from: Storage cavern creation Produced water from natural gas removed from storage Natural brines from other sources 4

Potential Scenarios for Injection Wells Associated with Porosity Storage Reinjection of fluids brought to the surface during normal gas recovery operations from porosity storage in depleted oil and gas reservoirs for: Disposal in geologic formations Pressure maintenance during storage and recovery cycling Stabilization during abandonment Reinjection of fluids brought to the surface during normal gas recovery operations from porosity storage in nonhydrocarbon reservoirs for: Disposal in geologic formations Pressure maintenance during storage and recovery cycling Stabilization during abandonment 5

Potential Injection Well Classes Class I - disposal wells which inject fluids beneath the lowermost formation containing a USDW Class II - wells which inject fluids brought to the surface in connection with conventional oil or natural gas production and may be commingled with waste waters Class III - wells which inject for extraction of minerals including solution mining of salts Class V injection wells not included in another class 40 CFR 146.6 6

Criteria for Exempted Aquifers Aquifer which cannot now and will not in the future serve as a source of drinking water because: It is mineral, hydrocarbon or geothermal energy producing, or can be demonstrated by a permit applicant as part of a permit application for a Class II or III operation to contain minerals or hydrocarbons that considering their quantity and location are expected to be commercially producible. It is situated at a depth or location which makes recovery of water for drinking water purposes economically or technologically impractical. 40 CFR 146.5 7

Storage Cavern Creation Injection into salt formation to create a storage cavern If the salt produced from such an operation is sold, then an injection well used in such an operation is most likely to be permitted as a Class III solution mining well. If solutions from such operations are disposed or stored for future storage and recovery recycling operations and the injection well is used for the natural gas storage project, then the well could be considered to be exempt from the UIC program and the cavern creation process considered part of construction meaning that no UIC permit would be required Alternatively, such wells could be permitted as Class III wells during cavern creation and then converted to natural gas storage not subject to UIC program regulation 8

Fluid Injection in Storage Caverns If fluid injection into storage caverns for pressure maintenance during storage and recovery cycling or for stabilization during closure and abandonment is done through the same wells used for natural gas storage and recovery, the wells may not be subject to regulation under the UIC program because they are considered to be natural gas storage wells. Alternatively, those wells and any other wells used for such purposes could be permitted as Class II wells used to inject fluids brought to the surface in conjunction with natural gas production (i.e., the recovery operation). 9

Fluid Injection in NG Porosity Storage If fluid injection into storage reservoirs for pressure maintenance during storage and recovery cycling or for stabilization during closure and abandonment is done through the same wells used for natural gas storage and recovery, the wells may not be subject to regulation under the UIC program because they are considered to be natural gas storage wells. Alternatively, those wells and any other wells used for such purposes could be permitted as Class II wells used to inject fluids brought to the surface in conjunction with natural gas production (i.e., the recovery operation). 10

Injection of Buffering Fluids for NG Storage Wells used to inject fluids from natural gas storage operations for future use for pressure maintenance or other purposes will most likely be permitted as Class II wells because the fluids are produced water from a natural gas storage operation involving gas recovery Alternatively, such wells may be permitted under Class V if the permitting authorities do not consider natural gas storage to be a production operation, It would be most sensible to have such wells under the same regulatory authority that permits natural gas storage at the state level, especially where the state has UIC primacy for Class II wells 11

Disposal of Fluids from NG Storage In most cases, wells used for disposal of any fluids from natural gas storage operations are permitted as Class II, regardless of whether the fluids were used for cavern creation or for other purposes such as pressure maintenance. The fluid is considered to be produced water equivalent for regulatory purposes to produced water from other oil and gas operations. Some states have chosen to regulate such wells as Class I industrial disposal wells. Alternatively, such wells could be permitted as Class V wells, providing greater flexibility to tailor project permits. 12

Summary and Conclusions Different states have taken different approaches to the permitting and regulation of injection wells associated with natural gas storage. Approaches have primarily been within the UIC program, but some limited approaches have been outside. It would be useful to conduct a comprehensive survey, especially as state programs for permitting and regulation of wells used directly for storage of natural gas are being updated. Primary focus should be on maintaining well integrity and natural gas containment. 13