Research Article. Formulation and in-vitro evaluation of orodispersible tablets of olanzapine for the improvement of dissolution rate

Similar documents
Formulation and in-vitro evaluation of pregabalin mini tablets for sustained release

Ramadevi K*, Mahalakshmi Y, Susheela V, Santhosh Kumar T, Chandra Sekhara Rao G,

International Journal of Pharmacy and Industrial Research

Direct compression of cushion layered ethyl cellulose coated extended release pellets into rapidly disintegrating tablets

Formulation design and development of Orodispersible tablets of Levetiracetam

Taste Masked Orodispersible Formulation of Fexofenadine Hydrochloride Using Ion Exchange Resins

Asian Journal of Research in Pharmaceutical Sciences and Biotechnology

Preparation and evaluation of loratadine tablets by using novel polacrilin potassium

International Journal of Pharma and Bio Sciences V1(1)2010

Formulation and Evaluation of Orodispersible Tablets of Ambroxol Hydrochloride

FORMULATION AND EVALUATION OF ROPINIROLE SUSTAINED RELEASED TABLETS BY USING NATURAL AND SYNTHETIC POLYMERS

Formulation and Evaluation of Domperidone Fast Dissolving Tablets.

International Journal of Research in Pharmaceutical and Nano Sciences Journal homepage:

International Journal of Pharma and Bio Sciences FORMULATION AND EVALUATION OF BILAYER TABLETS OF GLIMEPIRIDE AND CAPTOPRIL ABSTRACT

DESIGN, DEVELOPMENT AND CHARACTERIZATION OF MOUTH DISSOLVING TABLETS OF CINNARIZINE USING SUPER-DISINTEGRANTS

FORMULATION DEVELOPMENT AND EVALUATION OF FAMOTIDINE FLOATING TABLET

FORMULATION AND EVALUATION OF ORODISPERSIBLE TABLETS OF METOPROLOL TARTRATE WITH NATURAL AND SYNTHETIC SUPERDISINTEGRANTS

OPTIMIZATION OF OLANZAPINE MOUTH DISSOLVING TABLETS USING MICRONIZATION

Formulation and Evaluation of Oro-Dispersible Tablets Containing Meclizine Hydrochloride

Formulation and in vitro evaluation of bosentan osmatic controlled release tablets

Formulation and Evaluation of Telmisartan with Hydrochlorothiazide Conventional Release Tablets

Formulation and Evaluation of Cefixime Trihydrate Matrix Tablets Using HPMC, Sodium CMC, Ethyl Cellulose

International Journal of Innovative Pharmaceutical Sciences and Research

Brahmaiah Bonthagarala *, Prasanna Kumar Desu, Sreekanth Nama, Donthiboina Sudarshan

IJPAR Vol.4 Issue 4 Oct- Dec Journal Home page:

The frictional forces in a loose powder or granules can be measured by the. A funnel was filled to the brim and the test sample was allowed to flow

International Journal of Research in Pharmaceutical and Nano Sciences Journal homepage:

Research Article FORMULATION AND EVALUATION OF FAST DISSOLVING NEBIVOLOL HYDROCHLORIDE

Liquisolid Compacts Based Orodispersible Tablets to Enhance Solubility of Atorvastatin using Experimental Design

Formulation and Evaluation of Fast Disintegrating Tablets of Fluoxetine and Olanzapine

FORMULATION AND EVALUATION OF DICLOFENAC SODIUM TABLETS BY USING MELT GRANULATION TECHNIQUE

Dissolution Enhancement of Haloperidol Tablets using ph Modifier and Co-Solubilizer

Preparation and Evaluation of Sustained Release Tablet of Cyproheptadine Hydrochloride Using Carbopol and HPMC

Formulation and Evaluation of Immediate Release Tablets of Fexofenadine Hydrochloride

FORMULATION AND EVALUATION OF POLYMER EFFECT ON in-vitro KINETICS OF SUSTAINED RELEASE MATRIX TABLETS OF CARVEDILOL USING MODEL DEPENDENT METHODS

Formulation and Evaluation of Gastro retentive Bilayer Tablets- Glimepiride as Sustained Release and Lisinopril as Immediate Release

Scholars Research Library

International Journal of Drug Delivery 4 (2012) 82-88

Design of Controlled Release Non-erodible Polymeric Matrix Tablet Using Microwave Oven-assisted Sintering Technique

Scholars Research Library. Formulation and evaluation of Tramadol Hydrochloride sustained matrix tablets

Development, Characterisation and Invitro Evaluation of Buccoadhesive Bilayered Tablets for the Treatment of Hypertension

EVALUATION OF MORINGA OLEIFERA GUM AS A SUSTAINED RELEASE POLYMER IN DICLOFENAC SODIUM TABLET FORMULATION

Treatment of diabetes mellitus (DM) with conventional dosage forms is not effective as the drugs do not reach the site of

International Journal of Current Trends in Pharmaceutical Research. International Journal of Current Trends in Pharmaceutical Research

RESEARCH ARTICLE e-issn:

In the present investigation, suitability of a cost effective and convenient granulation technique that is, moisture activated

Formulation and Evaluation of Fast Dissolving Tablets of Ondansetron Hydrochloride

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INSTITUTIONAL PHARMACY AND LIFE SCIENCES

FORMULATION DEVELOPMENT AND EVALUATION OF SUSTAINED RELEASE MATRIX TABLETS OF VERAPAMIL HYDROCHLORIDE

DESIGNING & DEVELOPMENT OF SPHERICAL AGGLOMERATES OF IBUPROFEN- PARACETAMOL BLEND FOR IMPROVED TABLETING AND DISSOLUTION

DESIGN AND OPTIMIZATION OF ORODISSOLVING TABLET OF ANTIDEPRESSANT DRUG BY SUPERDISINTEGRANTS ADDITION METHOD

Received on Accepted on

CHAPTER-4 FORMULATION AND EVALUATION OF RIZATRIPTAN SUBLINGUAL TABLETS

Formulation and Evaluation of Ora-Solv Tablets of Pantoprazole Sodium

Indian Journal of Novel Drug delivery 5(3), Jul-Sep, 2013, Indian Journal of Novel Drug Delivery

FORMULATION AND EVALUATION OF ONCE-DAILY SUSTAINED RELEASE ACECLOFENAC PROSOPHIS JULIFLORA GUM MATRIX TABLETS

FORMULATION AND EVALUATION OF ACECLOFENAC MATRIX TABLETS USING ETHYL CELLULOSE AND CELLULOSE ACETATE PHTHALATE

Formulation and evaluation of fast dissolving tablets of Artemether and Lumefantrine

Journal of Global Trends in Pharmaceutical Sciences

PRINT ISSN: E-ISSN:

Formulation and Evaluation of Floating Capsules of 3 rd Generation Cephalosporin

Pelagia Research Library

CHAPTER-2 FORMULATION AND EVALUATION OF ZOLMITRIPTAN SUBLINGUAL TABLETS

Human Journals Research Article October 2018 Vol.:13, Issue:3 All rights are reserved by Gourishyam Pasa et al.

FORMULATION AND DEVELOPMENT OF KETOPROFEN BILAYER TABLETS

FORMULATION AND INVITRO EVALUATION OF ATAZANAVIR ORAL DISINTEGRATING TABLETS

Ranjith Reddy Kondeti et al., Asian Journal of Pharmaceutical Technology & Innovation, 02 (07); 2014; Research Article

THE PROCESS VALIDATION OF TABLET CONTAINING IRBESARTAN 300MG AND HYDROCHLOROTHIAZIDE 12.5mg Zamir Hussain, Baqir Shyum Naqvi & Muhammad Iqbal Nasiri

Formulation and Evaluation of Taste Masked Fast Disintegrating Tablet of Levocetirizine Dihydrochloride

Formulation and evaluation of biphasic Delivery system of aceclofenac mini-tablets in Hard gelatin capsules

Pelagia Research Library

Mohammed Muqtader. et al. / International Journal of Biopharmaceutics. 2012; 3(1): International Journal of Biopharmaceutics

Formulation and Evaluation of Orodispersible Tablet with an Extended Release Profile

International Journal of Research in Pharmaceutical and Nano Sciences Journal homepage:

DESIGN AND EVALUATION OF SUSTAINED RELEASE MATRIX TABLETS OF LEVOFLOXACIN EMPLOYING ALMOND GUM

Research Article ABSTRACT

International Journal of Research in Pharmaceutical and Nano Sciences Journal homepage:

Table 1. Particle size distributions and peroxide levels of various superdisintegrants. D50 (μm) D10 (μm)

FORMULATION AND DEVELOPMENT OF SUSTAINED RELEASE MATRIX TABLET OF NICORANDIL

FORMULATION AND EVALUATION OF ACYCLOVIR CR TABLETS: OPTIMIZATION BY 2 2 FACTORIALSTUDY

International Journal of PharmTech Research CODEN (USA): IJPRIF, ISSN: Vol.7, No.1, pp ,

Comparative study of Cross povidone and Cross Carmellose Sodium to formulate Immediate Release Tablet of Theophylline

Formulation and evaluation of cap-in-cap technology for biphasic drug delivery of glimepiride

Volume 1 Issue 1 Page 82

Venugopal P. et al. / International Journal of Biopharmaceutics. 2014; 5(4): International Journal of Biopharmaceutics

Formulation and Evaluation of Floating Tablets Using Nimesulide as a Model Drug

f a c t s T C C T B Tricalcium citrate as excipient for direct compression

PHARMACEUTICAL TECHNOLOGY REPORT. Introduction. Methods. Ashland Specialty Ingredients ashland.com

Formulation and In Vitro Evaluation of Lansoprazole Delayed Release Capsules

Asian Journal of Medical and Pharmaceutical Sciences. Asian Journal of Medical and Pharmaceutical Sciences

Formulation, optmization and evaluation of taste masked oral disintegrating tablet of verapamil HCL

Pelagia Research Library

Formulation and Evaluation of Stable Extended Release Tablets of Tapentadol Hydrochloride

Ganga Jyothi P. et al. / International Journal of Biopharmaceutics. 2014; 5(4): International Journal of Biopharmaceutics

The research work highlights the development and evaluation of. bioavailability of drugs. The buccal route can bypass the first-pass

Formulation and evaluation of fast dissolving lovastatin tablets by solid dispersion

The Pharmaceutical and Chemical Journal, 2015, 2(3): Research Article

DIRECTLY COMPRESSIBLE MEDICATED CHEWING GUM (MCG) FOR STAYING ALERT

FORMULATION AND IN-VITRO EVALUATION OF CONVENTIONAL TABLETS OF EZETIMIBE BY USING SOLID DISPERSION

Impact factor: /ICV:

Transcription:

Available online www.jocpr.com Journal of Chemical and Pharmaceutical Research, 2016, 8(1):177-181 Research Article ISSN : 0975-7384 CODEN(USA) : JCPRC5 Formulation and in-vitro evaluation of orodispersible tablets of olanzapine for the improvement of dissolution rate S. B. Thirumalesh Naik 1*, Kambham Venkateswarlu 1 and K. B. Chandrasekhar 2 1 Faculty of Pharmacy, Department of Pharmaceutics, Oil Technological Research Institute, Jawaharlal Nehru Technological University Anantapur, Ananthapuramu, Andhra Pradesh, India 2 Oil Technological Research Institute, Jawaharlal Nehru Technological University Anantapur, Ananthapuramu, Andhra Pradesh, India ABSTRACT The objective of this study was to formulate the orodispersible tablets (ODTs) of Olanzapine (OLZ) by direct compression method for the enhancement of dissolution rate. OLZ ODTs were prepared by direct compression method using co-processed superdisintegrants like sodium starch glycolate (SSG) and Croscarmellose sodium (CCS). It was observed from the evaluation studies that the results were complied with the official limits. In-vitro dissolution studies were carried out by USP dissolution apparatus, paddle method using ph 6.8 phosphate buffer and the formulations F8, F9 showed maximum drug release of 101.16% and 99.45% respectively within 2 min. It was evident from the drug release studies that the formulation F8 and F9 consists of CP-3 showed optimum drug release of 101.80% and 100.33% respectively. Key words: Olanzapine, Co-processed technique, Orodispersible tablets, Dissolution rate enhancement, superdisintegrants. INTRODUCTION The oral route of administration is the most preferred route due to its many advantages like ease of administration, accurate dosage, self-medication, pain avoidance, versatility and patient compliance [1-2]. Tablets and capsules are the most popular dosage forms. But one important drawback of such dosage forms is Dysphasia or difficulty in swallowing. This is seen to afflict nearly 35% of the general population. To solve the above-mentioned problems, pharmaceutical technologists have put in their best efforts to develop a Fast dissolving drug delivery, i.e. Mouth Dissolving Tablets (MDTs) that disintegrates and dissolves rapidly in the saliva, within a few seconds without the need of drinking water or chewing [3-8]. The optimum concentration of the superdisintegrant can be selected according to critical concentration of disintegrants. Below this concentration, the tablet disintegration time is inversely proportional to the concentration of the superdisintegrant, whereas if the concentration of superdisintegrant is above critical concentration, the disintegration time remains almost constant or even increases [9]. Co-processing is based on the novel concept of two or more excipients interacting at the sub particle level, the objective of which is to provide a synergy of functionality improvement as well as masking the undesirable properties of individuals. Co-processing excipients lead to the formulation of excipient granules with superior properties, compared with physical mixtures of 177

components or individual components [10-11]. Hence, the present study was concentrated on the enhancement of dissolution rate of OLZ ODTs by using the co-processed superdisintegrants. EXPERIMENTAL SECTION Materials The drug OLZ was purchased from Bright labs, India and superdisintegrants like Microcrystalline cellulose (MCC), Sodium starch glycolate (SSG), Croscarmellose sodium (CCS), lubricant like Magnesium stearate (MS) and glidant talk were obtained from Merck Specialities Pvt. Ltd., Mumbai, India. Methods FTIR studies The compatibility between the pure drug and excipients was detected by FTIR (Model-IR Affinity-1, Shimadzu, Japan). The potassium bromide pellets were prepared on KBr press by grounding the solid powder sample with 100 times the quantity of KBr in a mortar. The finely grounded powder was then introduced into a stainless steel die and was compressed between polished steel anvils at a pressure of about 8 t/in 2. The spectra were recorded over the wave number of 4000 to 400 cm -1 and the spectra of pure drug were compared with its spectra of physical mixture. Formulation of ODTs of OLZ Preparation of co-processed super disintegrants Co-processed super disintegrates were prepared by using SSG and CCS. The super disintegrates were mixed in different concentrations and labeled as CP1, CP2, CP3. The blend of super disintegrates was mixed thoroughly for a period of 15 min, collected and used for preparing the OLZ ODTs (Table 1). Table 1. Composition of co processed super disintegrates Ingredients (mg) CP1 CP2 CP3 SSG 100 100 100 CCS 100 200 300 CP = Co-processed super disintegrants Preparation of tablets Composition of OLZ ODTs was shown in table 2. All the ingredients were weighed and required quantity of drug and excipients were mixed thoroughly in a polybag. The blend was compressed by direct compression method using rotary tablet machine-8 station with 8 mm flat punch (RIMEK rotary Tablet Punching machine, India). Each tablet contains 3 mg of OLZ and the final tablet weight was fixed to 100 mg. Table 2. Composition of various tablet formulations Ingredients (mg) F1 F2 F3 F4 F5 F6 F7 F8 F9 OLZ 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 CP 1 10 20 30 - - - - - - CP 2 - - - 10 20 30 - - - CP 3 - - - - - - 10 20 30 MS 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Talc 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 MCC Qs Qs Qs Qs Qs Qs Qs Qs Qs Total weight 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 Flow properties The precompression parameters like Loose bulk Density (LBD) and Tapped bulk density (TBD), angle of repose, Hausner s ratio and Carr s index were performed for powder blend according to the standard procedures [12]. Post-compression parameters Post-compression parameters like friability, hardness, thickness, weight variation, content uniformity, disintegration tests were evaluated for the tablets according to the standard procedures [13]. Drug Content The content uniformity test is used to ensure that every tablet contains the amount of drug substance intended with little variation among the tablets within a batch. Four tablets were weighed and crushed in the mortar. The powder 178

equivalent to 1.25 mg of the drug were weighed and dissolved in 100 ml ph 6.8 phosphate buffer, suitably diluted and estimated by using UV Visible spectrophotometer (Lab India, UV-3200) at 278nm. In-vitro dissolution studies In-vitro release studies were carried out by using USP dissolution apparatus type-ii (Lab India, DS-800). It was performed by using 900 ml dissolution fluid (ph 6.8 phosphate buffer) at a speed of 50 rpm and temperature of 37 0 C. Samples of dissolution medium (5ml) were withdrawn for specified time intervals (2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 15, 20, 30, 45 & 60 min) and assayed for OLZ by measuring absorbance at 278 nm and replaced with the same volume of ph 6.8 phosphate buffer. Application of release rate kinetics to dissolution data Various models were tested for explaining the kinetics of drug release. To analyze the mechanism of the drug release and rate kinetics of the dosage form, the obtained in-vitro drug release data was subjected to zero order, first order, Higuchi and Korsmeyer-Peppas release models. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION FTIR studies From the FTIR data it was evident that the drug and super disintegrants, other excipients do not have any interactions. Hence they were compatible (Figure 1 & 2). Figure 1. FTTR Spectrum of OLZ pure drug Figure 2. FTIR Spectrum of Optimized Formulation 179

Precompression parameters The values for angle of repose were found in the range of 25.78-29.34. Carr s index of the prepared blends was fall in the range of 13.06% to 18.18% and Hausner s ration fall in range of 1.14 to 1.22. From the results, it was concluded that the powder blends had good flow properties and these can be used for tablet manufacture (Table 3). Table 3. Precompression parameters Formulations Bulk Density Tapped Density Carr s Index Angle of Repose (gm/cm 2 ) (gm/cm 2 Hausner s ratio ) (%) (Ɵ) F1 0.45 0.55 18.18 1.22 27.91 F2 0.47 0.55 14.54 1.17 28.23 F3 0.50 0.58 13.79 1.16 29.34 F4 0.46 0.55 16.36 1.19 26.71 F5 0.50 0.58 13.79 1.16 29.34 F6 0.47 0.55 14.54 1.17 28.23 F7 0.50 0.58 13.79 1.16 29.34 F8 0.41 0.50 18 1.21 26.78 F9 0.41 0.50 18 1.21 26.78 Post compression Parameters Tablets of each batch were subjected to weight variation test. The average weight of the tablet was approximately in the range of 98.5 to 107 and the permissible limit is ±10% (90-110 mg). The results of the test showed that the tablet weights were within the pharmacopoeia limit. Hardness of the three tablets of each batch was checked by using Monsanto hardness tester and it was in the range of 2.5 to 3.00 kg/cm 2, which was within the IP limits. Thickness of three tablets of each batch was checked by using Vernier Caliper and the thickness of the tablet was raging from 3.56 to 3.64 mm. The average friability of all the formulations lies in the range of 0.30 to 0.51% which was less than 1%, as per official requirement of IP indicating a good mechanical resistance of tablets. The results showed that the disintegration time of prepared tablets were in the range of 12.66 to 30.33 sec. Assay studies were performed for the prepared formulations. From the content uniformity studies, it was observed that all the formulations were showing the % drug content values within 97.23 to 99.25 % (Table 4). Table 4. Post compression studies of OLZ ODT Formulation Weight variation Hardness Thickness Disintegration Time Friability Content uniformity (mg) (kg/cm 2 ) (mm) (sec) (%) (%) F1 105 2.5 3.59 20.33 0.43 97.23 F2 104 2.6 3.64 22.66 0.34 98.55 F3 110 2.5 3.59 30.33 0.49 98.16 F4 109 2.6 3.58 19.00 0.47 99.34 F5 99.4 2.3 3.59 30.33 0.49 98.16 F6 102 2.7 3.64 22.66 0.34 98.55 F7 101 2.5 3.59 30.33 0.49 98.16 F8 107 2.6 3.56 17.00 0.34 99.25 F9 102 2.5 3.56 17.00 0.34 99.25 Table 5. In-vitro drug release of all the formulations Time (min) F1 F2 F3 F4 F5 F6 F7 F8 F9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 25.4 31.7 30.8 24.3 39.5 14.9 48.3 101.16 99.45 4 39.6 34.5 36.72 31.6 76.3 28.4 82.9 101.80 100.33 6 48.6 41.9 56.16 49.3 96.2 33.1 98.7 8 64.3 62.4 87.4 58.3 99.7 59.7 10 76.4 89.1 98.5 74.3 79.3 15 97.1 99.5 88.1 88.9 20 97.6 94.6 93.5 25 98.1 98.1 In-vitro Dissolution studies In-vitro dissolution studies were carried out by USP dissolution apparatus, paddle method using ph 6.8 phosphate buffer. The dissolution studies were carried out for about 30 min. From the results, it was evident that the formulations prepared with CP3 showed maximum % drug release in 2 min i.e.101.80% and 100.33% (F8 and F9 180

respectively). F8 formulation was considered as an optimized formulation as it contains less concentration of super disintegrates (Table 5 and Figure 3). Figure 3. Dissolution profiles of all the formulations CONCLUSION OLZ ODTs were successfully prepared by co-processed super disintegrants and evaluated. From the results, it could be concluded that the formulation F8 and F9 showed maximum drug release within short period of time i.e. 2 min, hence there is a lot of scope for in-vivo studies. REFERENCES [1] K Venkateswarlu; A Shanthi. IOSR J Pharm Biol Sci., 2012, 2(5),17-23. [2] A Srikanth; Y Prasanna Raju; N Devanna; K Venkateswarlu. Int J Med Pharm Res., 2014, 2(3), 662-668. [3] S Velmurugan; S Vinushitha. Int J Chem Pharm Sci., 2010, 1(2), 1-12. [4] W Brniak; R Jachowicz; P Pelka. Saudi Pharm J., 2015, 23, 437-443 [5] C Desai; B Prabhakar. Int J Pharm Sci Res., 2015, 6(4), 1624-1634. [6] EA Yapar. J Appl Pharm Sci., 2014, 4(02), 118-25. [7] P Raja Sridhar Rao; G Chandrasekara Rao. Trop J Pharm Res., 2014, 13(5), 669-675. [8] M Patel; C Oza1; MM Soniwala; S Panda. J Pharm Sci Biosci Res., 2012, 2(4), 189-194. [9] Ramadevi; Y Mahalakshmi; V Susheela; T Santhosh Kumar; G Chandra Sekhara Rao. Int J Pharm Develop Tech., 2015, 5(1), 1-6. [10] SO Eraga; MI Arhewoh; MU Uhumwangho; MA Iwuagwu. Asian Pac J Trop Biomed., 2015, 5(9), 768-772. [11] K Harsha, K Jogi. World J Pharm Res., 2014, 3(3), 3863-3885. [12] Shah D; Shah Y; Rampradhan M. Drug Dev Ind Pharm., 1997, 23, 567-74. [13] Khan KA. The concept of dissolution efficiency. J Pharm Pharmacol., 1975, 27, 48-9. 181