Use of Grade 80 Reinforcement in Oregon

Similar documents
Bijan Khaleghi, Ph, D. P.E., S.E.

For Two Steel Bridges

How Loads Are Distributed

Agricultural Hall and Annex East Lansing, MI. Structural Design. Gravity Loads. 1- Based on US Standards

SELLWOOD BRIDGE REPLACEMENT PROJECT

BRIDGE DESIGN MANUAL UPDATES. Jamie F. Farris, P.E.

Item 442 Metal for Structures

DESIGN AND ANALYSIS OF PRECAST CONCRETE BRIDGES IN AREAS OF HIGH OR MODERATE SEISMICITY

Ductile Detailing for Earthquake Resistant R C Structures. Dr. S. K. PRASAD Professor of Civil Engineering S.J. College of Engineering Mysore

Seismic Performance of Precast Concrete Bents used for Accelerated Bridge Construction. Bijan Khaleghi 1

AASHTO LRFD Seismic Bridge Design. Jingsong Liu July 20, 2017

Chapter 2 Notation and Terminology

Tips For Designing Constructable Concrete Buildings

JULY 2014 LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN 5-1

Appendix M 2010 AASHTO Bridge Committee Agenda Item

Lintel Tables Design Notes and Limitations

Prestress Superstructure Tutorial

Strain Limits for Concrete Filled Steel Tubes in AASHTO Seismic Provisions. PIs: Mervyn Kowalsky and James Nau RA: Nicole King

14. Structural Concrete

Supplemental Plan Check List for Concrete Special Moment Resisting Frame

SECTION 415 REINFORCING FOR CONCRETE

A precast Concrete Bridge Bent for Seismic Regions: Achieving both Performance and Constructability

Challenging Skew: Higgins Road Bridge over I-90

Seismic Evaluation and Retrofit of Beam- Column Joints of Mid-America Bridges Part 2: Steel Sheet and Plate Retrofit

Modjeski and Masters, Inc. Consulting Engineers 04/18/06 St. Croix River Bridge 3D Analysis Report Introduction

William W. Wilkins Professional Building Columbus, Ohio

New Development in Accelerated Bridge Design and Construction in WA

2014 HDR, all rights reserved.

One-Way Wide Module Joist Concrete Floor Design

SEISMIC PERFORMANCE OF BRIDGE SLAB-COLUMN JOINTS WITH HEADED REINFORCEMENT

Corrosion Resistant Reinforcing Steel (CRR)

FEBRUARY 2019 LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN 5-1

DIVISION: CONCRETE SECTION: REINFORCING STEEL REPORT HOLDER: MMFX TECHNOLOGIES A COMMERCIAL METALS COMPANY

Bonner Bridge Replacement Update:

BrD Superstructure Tutorial

Seismic Detailing of RC Structures (IS: )

Block D- Reinforcing

USE OF 500 GRADE STEEL IN THE DESIGN OF REINFORCED CONCRETE SLAB. Prof. M. Shafiul Bari, Ph.D Department of Civil Engg., BUET

by Dr. Mark A. Ketchum, OPAC Consulting Engineers for the EERI 100 th Anniversary Earthquake Conference, April 17, 2006

INSTEEL WIRE PRODUCTS. Product Catalog

BRIDGE DESIGN MEMORANDUM DM0115

This final draft of the fib MC2010 has not been published; it is intended only for the purpose of voting by the General Assembly.

MIDAS Training Series

Pro-Con Structural Study for Alternative Floor Systems October 27, 2004

Temecula Medical Center Temecula, CA

Supplemental Plan Check List for Concrete Special Moment Resisting Frame

LRFD Bridge Design Manual Changes

HIGH PERFORMANCE CONCRETE. by John J. Roller CTLGroup

LRFD Minimum Flexural Reinforcement Requirements

Seismic Design and Retrofit. Reginald DesRoches Professor and Associate Chair Georgia Institute of Technology

M.S. Comprehensive Examination: Design

Accelerated Bridge Construction in USA

ANALYSIS AND DESIGN OF MULTI-STOREY COMPOSITE BUILDING

Route 360 Inverted T-beams. Carin Roberts-Wollmann Virginia Tech Tommy Cousins Clemson University Fatmir Menkulasi Louisiana Tech

MDOT Camelback Bridge Example

Special Provision No. 109S17 June 2017

Cross Frame Design for Curved and Skewed Bridges

Performance Objectives and the AASHTO Guide Specifications for LRFD Seismic Bridge Design

PIER PROTECTION (VEHICLE COLLISION) September 13, 2018

VERTICAL COMPONENT EFFECT OF EARTHQUAKE IN SEISMIC PERFORMANCE OF REINFORCED CONCRETE BRIDGE PIERS

Composite Steel/Concrete

Table of Contents 2. Structural Systems.4 Foundations.4 Floor System...4 Columns..5 Lateral System...5

Tilikum Crossing Transit Bridge. Portland, OR

AREMA 2008 Annual Conference. LOW PROFILE RAILROAD BRIDGE Steve K. Jacobsen, PE NNW, Inc. Rochester, Minnesota

Texas Transportation Institute The Texas A&M University System College Station, Texas

CHEF MENTEUR BRIDGE REPLACEMENT

CALTRANS SDC PROCEDURE

Design and Construction of the SH58 Ramp A Flyover Bridge over IH70. Gregg A. Reese, PE, CE, Summit Engineering Group, Inc.

SEISMIC PERFORMANCE OF FLAT-SLAB SHEAR REINFORCEMENT

Structural Technical Report 1 Structural Concepts / Structural Existing Conditions Report

Evaluation of Bridge Post -Earthquake Traffic Load Carrying Capacity using Hybrid Simulation

Reinforced Concrete Column Design

STRUCTURES INSPECTION CERTIFICATION TRAINING COURSE

John James Audubon Bridge

Ductility of Welded Steel Column to Cap Beam Connections Phase 2

BS EN :2004 EN :2004 (E)

ISSUE A Code Change # 2 Class 3 and Class 4 Buildings

Bridge Beams/Girders

AASHTO LRFD. Reinforced Concrete. Eric Steinberg, Ph.D., P.E. Department of Civil Engineering Ohio University

LRFD SEISMIC BRIDGE DESIGN, CALIFORNIA EXAMPLE. Mark S. Mahan 1

ERRATA for AASHTO LRFD Bridge Design Specifications, 8th Edition, Sections 3, 5, and 6 Academic Offer (NCBC-8)

ABC-UTC. Research Progress Report (Feasibility Study) Title: Alternative ABC Connections Utilizing UHPC. March, 2017

CE 4460 Bridge Project Spring By: Megan Allain Bryan Beyer Paul Kocke Anna Wheeler

EGCE 406: Bridge Design

111 MORGAN ST. Ryan Friis

Prestressed Concrete Structure Tutorial

Technical Note. High-Strength Reinforcing Bars ENGINEERING. Introduction ETN-M-8-16

FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

TECHNICAL REPORT III LATERAL STRUCTURAL SYSTEM ANALYSIS

AASHTOWare BrD 6.8 Substructure Tutorial Pier Drilled Shaft Example

Chapter 13 Bridge Load Rating

Rutgers University Law School Building Addition and Renovation Camden, NJ

Design of Buchanan County, Iowa, Bridge Using Ultra High Performance Concrete and PI Girders

Perma-Column Deck Post Design Manual DP4430, DP4440, DP4640, DP6630, DP6640, DP6430, and DP6440 models

CONTINUITY OF PRECAST BRIDGE U-GIRDERS CONNECTED TO A CAST-IN-PLACE SUBSTRUCTURE SUBJECTED TO SEISMIC LOADS

30 kip/ft (Dead load) 5 ft. 20 ft

Load capacity rating of an existing curved steel box girder bridge through field test

Analysis and Design of One-way Slab System (Part-I)

Thesis Proposal 12/13/06

2016 AISC Standards. Specification for Structural Steel Buildings & Code of Standard Practice for Steel Buildings and Bridges.

Transcription:

Use of Grade 80 Reinforcement in Oregon Craig Shike, PE Bridge Operations & Standards Managing Engineer

PRESENTATION OUTLINE Material Properties of High Strength Reinforcement Recent Grade 80 Research Potential Cost Savings Recommendations for Implementation

Changes in AASHTO Bridge Design Specifications 2013 6 th Edition with interim revisions - Allowed high strength bars up to 100 ksi Not yet for design - Shear combined with torsion - Horizontal shear - etc. 1973 11 th Edition - Added load factors - Allowed Grade 60 bars AASHTO Standard Specifications for Highway Bridges Grade 40 bars 1961 8 th Edition - Included prestressed concrete section

BDDM 1.5.5.1.17 High Strength Reinforcement

BDDM 1.5.5.1.17 High Strength Reinforcement

BDDM 1.5.5.1.17 High Strength Reinforcement

ASTM A706 Grade 80 Cost 10% premium Stress strain behavior Ductility Weldability Minimum order of 50 Tons for each size and cut length! (Verify with local mill)

ASTM A706 Grade 80

Grade 80 Grade 60

HIGH STRENGTH 8 foot diameter shaft

Bridge Projects in Oregon Newberg Dundee Bypass Project Chehalem Creek Bridge (22008) Sellwood Bridge Project Multnomah County Sellwood Bridge (21493) Portland Milwaukie Light Rail Transit Project Tilikum Crossing, Bridge of the People

Br. 22002 - Hess Creek

Bents 3 6 6 ft column (50 60 ft long) 38 - #11 (1.5% reinforcement ratio) 8 ft drilled shaft (~100 ft long) Bending moment = 30,000 kips-ft Shear = 1,300 kips #11 vertical bars #6 stirrup

30 ft long section Bid unit price $0.77/Lb Bid unit price for Grade 60 $0.80/Lb Grade 60 21,150 Lbs Grade 80 16,350 Lbs -23%

Bridge Projects in Oregon Newberg Dundee Bypass Project Chehalem Creek Bridge (22008) Sellwood Bridge Project Multnomah County Sellwood Bridge (21493) Portland Milwaukie Light Rail Transit Project Tilikum Crossing, Bridge of the People

Arch rib springing elements 10-ft drilled shaft #18 vertical bars #8 welded hoops

Bridge Projects in Oregon Newberg Dundee Bypass Project Chehalem Creek Bridge (22008) Sellwood Bridge Project Multnomah County Sellwood Bridge (21493) Portland Milwaukie Light Rail Transit Project Tilikum Crossing, Bridge of the People

Lower portion of pylons and cross frame Edge girders for bridge deck Foundation

Grade 80 in a Typical Deck - Jackson School Road Over Hwy 47 82.2 ft width x 277.2 ft length = 22,800 ft 2

Grade 80 in a Typical Deck Grade 60 Grade 80 #5 @ 7.5 Transverse bars #4 @ 6.5 in P/S girder segments #4 @ 6 in CIP box girder segments 131,300 Lbs Total weight 110,800 Lbs (16% reduction) (66 tons) (55 Tons) $ 118,200 Cost $ 105,300 ($ 12,900 reduction = 11%) ($0.90 / Lb) (0.95 / Lb) Price where Grade 80 is the same cost as Grade 60 = $1.07 / Lb (+ 17 )

Crossbeam Grade 60 Top: 12 - #11 bars Bottom, Row 2 20 - #11 bars Bottom, Row 1 20 - #11 bars #6 stirrups @ 6 ctrs

Crossbeam - Grade 80 Top: 9 - #11 bars Bottom, Row 2: 12 - #11 bars Bottom, Row 1: 18 - #11 bars Stirrups #6 @ 8 ctrs

Crossbeam - Grade 100 Top: 8 - #11 bars Bottom, Row 2: 8 - #11 bars Bottom, Row 1: 16 - #11 bars Stirrups #6 @ 10 ctrs

Cost Comparison (based on two crossbeams) Grade 60 Grade 80 Grade 100 61,250 Lbs 51,150 Lbs (-16%) 45,200 Lbs (-18%) $55,100 (@ 0.90/Lb) $45,600 (@0.95/Lb) $47,500 (@1.05/Lb) $ 6,500 savings $ 7,600 savings 12% cost reduction 14% cost reduction Equivalent Grade 60 cost $ 1.08 per Lb (+18 ) $ 1.22 per Lb (+32 ) 16 Tons of #11 bar 13 Tons of #11 bar

Grade 40 60 80 100 (Positive moment only) Grade 40 108 - #11 bars Grade 60 70 - #11 bars 35% < Gr 40 Top row of bundled bars eliminated

Grade 40 60 80 100 (Positive moment only) Grade 80 54 - #11 bars 23% < Gr 60 Some 3-bar bundles reduced to 2-bar bundles Grade 100 44 - #11 bars 37% < Gr 60 No 3-bar bundles

Concerns & Issues Seismic performance not established Research ongoing for Grade 80 Availability & cost needs to be verified Cost likely to increase as high-strength becomes more available Splice lengths, hook lengths, development lengths are longer Minimum steel, crack control, temperature steel requirements

Recommendations Decks, Crossbeams, Drilled Shafts Reduced congestion and lower cost ~ 21,000 ft 2 of deck area req d for 50 ton minimum order Verify availability and cost with local rebar suppliers The market is likely to change significant in the next few years Current cost savings with Grade 80 approx. 10-12% for OR projects If < 50 tons, consider detailing both Grade 60 and HS Combining Grades okay if at least two bar size difference