Removal of High Ammonia Levels from Municipal Wastewater Using Humic Acid and Selective Bio-Augmentation

Similar documents
SBR FOR LOW FLOW APPLICATIONS

CITY OF OXFORD WASTEWATER TREATMENT FACILITY ANNUAL PERFORMANCE REPORT FOR THE CALENDAR YEAR OF 2014

CITY OF OXFORD WASTEWATER TREATMENT FACILITY ANNUAL PERFORMANCE REPORT FOR THE CALENDAR YEAR OF 2012

Feasibility Report on Sewage Treatment Plant (STP)

CSR Process Simulations Can Help Municipalities Meet Stringent Nutrient Removal Requirements

FEASIBILITY REPORT OF 250 KLD SEWAGE TREATMENT PLANT

CITY OF OXFORD WASTEWATER TREATMENT FACILITY ANNUAL PERFORMANCE REPORT FOR THE CALENDAR YEAR OF 2018

SBR PROCESS FOR WASTEWATER TREATMENT

ECO Smart Aerobic Waste Water Treatment System. Optimising the re-use and recycling of waste water

Assuming 100 gallons per capita per day, and 3 people per REU, design flows for the development are proposed to be:

Dundalk Wastewater Treatment Plant

AquaNereda Aerobic Granular Sludge Technology

WASTEWATER TREATMENT SYSTEM

ISAM INTEGRATED SURGE ANOXIC MIX

1/11/2016. Types and Characteristics of Microorganisms. Topic VI: Biological Treatment Processes. Learning Objectives:

Water Resources Director: Chris Graybeal

Watertown Wastewater Facility Plan. August 11, 2015

TWO YEARS OF BIOLOGICAL PHOSPHORUS REMOVAL WITH AN ADVANCED MSBR SYSTEM AT THE SHENZHEN YANTIAN WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT

Wastewater Systems. By Reza Shams-Khorzani, Ph.D. VP - Bio-Microbics, Inc. 9 th KWEA/KsAWWA Annual Joint Conference August 29, 2017 Wichita, Kansas

Oxidation Ditch Technologies

Biological Phosphorus Removal Technology. Presented by: Eugene Laschinger, P.E.

Post-Aerobic Digester with Bioaugmentation Pilot Study City of Meridian, ID WWTP PNCWA 2010

ONSITE TREATMENT. Amphidrome

Bloomingdale WWTF Private/Public Partnership Works. Bob Wilcox, PE Fleis & VandenBrink May 10, 2016

Oxidation Ditch Technologies WATER TECHNOLOGIES

NEW BIOLOGICAL PHOSPHORUS REMOVAL CONCEPT SUCCESSFULLY APPLIED IN A T-DITCH PROCESS WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT

2017 Annual Performance Report

ENHANCING THE PERFORMANCE OF OXIDATION DITCHES. Larry W. Moore, Ph.D., P.E., DEE Professor of Environmental Engineering The University of Memphis

Aqua MSBR MODIFIED SEQUENCING BATCH REACTOR

Algae Removal from a Facultative Lagoon System Using Dissolved Air Flotation. J. Patrick Pierce, P.E. Environmental Treatment Systems, Inc.

Module 17: The Activated Sludge Process - Part III Answer Key

WASTEWATER DEPARTMENT. Bentonville Wastewater Treatment Plant Facts:

Wastewater Treatment. Where does wastewater go when it leaves your house?

Nutrient Removal Optimization at the Fairview WWTP

Presentation Outline

AquaPASS. Aqua MixAir System. Phase Separator. System Features and Advantages. Anaerobic. Staged Aeration. Pre-Anoxic.

SIMPLE and FLEXIBLE ENERGY SAVINGS And PERFORMANCE ENHANCEMENT for OXIDATION DITCH UPGRADES

Dundalk Wastewater Treatment Plant

SECTION 8.0 NEWPCC SECOND PRIORITY CONTROL ALTERNATIVES

Increasing Denitrification in Sequencing Batch Reactors with Continuous Influent Feed

Anaerobic Digester Optimization with Bio-Organic Catalyst. NYWEA 81 st Annual Meeting February 3, 2009 One Year Study November 07 - November 08

Anaerobic Digester Optimization with Bio-Organic Catalyst

Integrated Activated Sludge and Biosolids Treatment to Conserve Energy & Waste Solids Disposal

COMPARISON OF SBR AND CONTINUOUS FLOW ACTIVATED SLUDGE FOR NUTRIENT REMOVAL

Wet Weather and Advanced Treatment: Procurement Strategies to Secure the Right Technology

<1ppm Phosphorus A BNR With No Chemical Addition Case Study

LEMNA BIOLOGICAL TREATMENT PROCESS LEMTEC TM TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

North Side WRP Master Plan Research and Development Department 2006 Seminar Series October 27, 2006 Metropolitan Water Reclamation District of

Tales from the Field: Troubleshooting Denitrification

Efficient Design Configurations for Biological Nutrient Removal

At the Mercy of the Process Impacts of Nitrogen Removal Performance on WWTP Disinfection

CORPORATION THE EXPERIENCED LEADER IN SEQUENCING BATCH REACTOR TECHNOLOGY

EHS SMART-Treat Onsite Moving Media Treatment System

Aeration System Improvements with a 5-Year Payback. Scott Phipps

Winery FAST & Floating FAST

Operation and Control of Multiple BNR Processes in One WWTP

Page 1 For More Information Call (801)

Omnipac Field-Erected SBR Package Plants. jet tech sbr technology

Demonstration of IFAS Technology for Cold Temperature Nitrification in Lagoon WWTFs at Clare and Ludington, Michigan

6. WASTEWATER. 6.1 Overview. 6.2 Darvill Wastewater Works

TAMING TIGERS AND WRESTLING ANACONDAS: PENDER COUNTY COMMERCE PARK WWTP

Altoona Westerly Wastewater Treatment Facility BNR Conversion with Wet Weather Accommodation

CORPORATION THE EXPERIENCED LEADER IN SEQUENCING BATCH REACTOR TECHNOLOGY

Performance Evaluation of 137 MLD Sewage Treatment Plant at Kasna U.P., INDIA Faheem Khan, Nitin Sharma, Avneet Kr.

6 WASTEWATER. 6.1 Overview. 6.2 Darvill Wastewater Works

No-Holds-Barred Match: RBC vs. MBR

Contents General Information Abbreviations and Acronyms Chapter 1 Wastewater Treatment and the Development of Activated Sludge

PILOT SCALE TESTS OF A UNIQUE APPROACH FOR BNR UPGRADE OF A SHORT SRT HIGH PURITY OXYGEN SYSTEM AT PIMA COUNTY, AZ

City of Elk River Wastewater Treatment Facility Improvements. Achieving Wastewater Treatment Goals

Waste water treatment

Center Sanitation District

NITROGEN REMOVAL GRANT WEAVER, PE & WWTP OPERATOR PRESIDENT THE WATER PLANET COMPANY. Create Optimal Habitats

Sewer Charge & Surcharge Provision Development, Implementation & Benefits

BIO-BATCH TM. Sequencing Batch Reactor (SBR) Water & Wastewater Treatment

Feasibility Report of Proposed ETP cum STP. M/s. Zakiya Healthcare Plot No.39, Pharmacity Selaqui, Dehradun (Uttarakhand)

Wastewater Facility Plan City of Marshall, Minnesota

AMPC Wastewater Management Fact Sheet Series Page 1

AMPC Wastewater Management Fact Sheet Series Page 1

Choices to Address Filamentous Growth

James Winslade Instructor, Environmental Resources Training Center Southern Illinois University-Edwardsville

SECTION 9.0 SEWPCC SECOND PRIORITY CONTROL ALTERNATIVES

Enhanced Nutrient Removal by Extended Aeration. Christina Edvardsson MicroSepTec, Inc

Technical Bulletin 169. Design of Diffused Aeration System. by:

RYKI WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT FIRST NEREDA IN POLAND Authors: Joana Doutor, Janusz Sławiński and Bart de Bruin

Upgrading Lagoons to Remove Ammonia, Nitrogen, and Phosphorus *nutrient removal in cold-climate lagoon systems

Optimization of BNR from Wastewater Using SBR and A 2 O Processes. Guo, Lei (Eric)

ISAM SBR with Blower Assisted Jet Aeration Design Calculations For Lyons, CO WWTP Upgrade

ADVENT INTEGRAL SYSTEM

Performance of a Tire Chip Media Constructed Wetland Presented by William Li, PE, Stantec Consulting Inc Geoffrey Holmes, Superintendent, Fisherman

2015 HDR, Inc., all rights reserved.

2015 Spring Conference

BEING GOOD STEWARDS: IMPROVING EFFLUENT QUALITY ON A BARRIER ISLAND. 1.0 Executive Summary

RESULTS OF ECOSYSTEMS PLUS INJECTION IN SECONDARY AERATION LAGOONS

DEVELOPMENT OF THE. Ken Mikkelson, Ph.D. Ed Lang Lloyd Johnson, P.E. Aqua Aerobic Systems, Inc.

NITROGEN REMOVAL USING SATURATED UPFLOW WOODY FIBER MEDIA. Larry D. Stephens, P.E. 1

Alexandria Sewage Lagoon Treatment Facility Municipal Class C Environmental Assessment Public Information Centre #2 Welcome!

CLR Process. Vertical Loop Configuration

Anderson Water Pollution Control Plant

Jaffrey, New Hampshire

Transcription:

Removal of High Ammonia Levels from Municipal Wastewater Using Humic Acid and Selective Bio-Augmentation Prepared by: Brent W. Cowan, P.E. Coatesville, PA 19320 Steven M. Cawley Cawley Environmental Services, Inc. 284 Boot Road Downingtown, PA 19335 Len T. Wall Dyson Products, Inc. 8107 Marshalsea Drive Commerce Township, MI 48382

Objective: The purpose of this project was to evaluate the feasibility of applying Bio-Regen Municipal (BRM), a blend of pharmaceutical grade Humic Acid (98.5%) and a blend of highly specific stabilized bacteria, to remove high concentrations of ammonia from a package wastewater treatment plant operating at a 270-site recreational campground. BRM was selected from a series of waste-specific Bio-Regen products (BRM-Animal, Paper, Food, Textile, etc.) that had shown similar reduction of various contaminants. Numerous discharge violations over several years of operation along with more stringent limits and monitoring requirements made it imperative that a solution be found. Without an operational solution the campground would likely have to upgrade the treatment plant at considerable expense. Background: During seasonal operation (May-November) the treatment plant receives high strength wastewater from recreational trailer black water tanks. This water is typically anaerobic and/or has been aseptically stabilized by the addition of a bacteriostatic tank additive. These additives often contain formaldehyde or glutaraldehyde based biocides to control the anaerobic activity in the waste tank until it can be discharged. Flows to the treatment plant during the week days (M-F) were on the average of 500-600 gpd with Saturday and Sunday contributing 2500-3000 gpd. Flows in excess of 4000 gpd have occurred but are not common. The treatment plant configuration consists of diffused aeration, surface skimmers, sludge recycle, a 4000 gal equalizations tank (EQ), 10,000 gal aeration, 1700 gal clarifier, 210 gal chlorine contact chamber and a 1500 gal waste sludge holding tank and is operated as an extended aeration facility. Influent carbonaceous 5-day biological oxygen demand CBOD 5 and Ammonia (as N) were typically 230-260 mg/l and 230-250 mg/l respectively. Plant operations were adjusted by periodic measurement of O 2 (maintained at 1.5 mg/l and above) and Imhoff cone settling tests for sludge volume, wasting requirements and effluent quality. Seasonal NPDES discharge limits for the treatment plant are shown in Table 1. Table 1 Seasonal NPDES Discharge Limits (monthly average) Sample Period NH 3 -N CBOD 5 TSS 5-1 to 10-31 2.80 25 30 11-1 to 4-30 8.40 25 30 Page 2 of 6

Bio-Regen Dosing Program Based on the liquid holding volume of the EQ tank (4000 gal) a one-time inoculation dose was shot fed to the EQ tank at a concentration of 100 ppm-as product. The 100 ppm shot feed level was determined from other applications where it was shown to activate the stabilized bacteria and initiate a rapid reduction of nutrients, and BOD. A diaphragm chemical feed pump was then used to flow-proportionately feed a concentration of 40 ppm for the remainder of the campground season. Because of the late start and subsequent shorter duration of the campground season, it was not possible to fine tune or trim the Bio-Regen feed rate below 40 ppm. Results and Discussion Table 2 and Figure 1 present plant influent and effluent ammonia levels for the period of May- Oct. Prior to the addition of BRM, influent ammonia levels ranged from 60 mg/l 256 mg/l while pre-brm effluent ammonia levels ranged from a low of 3.2 mg/l to a high of 55 mg/l. Prior to the addition of BRM, the lower effluent levels of ammonia (3.2 mg/l) were attributed to little or no activity/visitation at the campground. This correlates to the lower influent ammonia concentrations shown in late May. Further into the summer months, the activity of the park increased as did the effluent ammonia levels (see dates of 6-3 thru 6-29). BRM was introduced on July 6, 2004 and within 7-days the plant effluent ammonia levels plummeted to a high of 3 mg/l, a low of 0.5 mg/l, with a resultant average of 1.29 mg/l over a 106-day evaluation period. Influent ammonia levels remained at or above 200 mg/l during the same evaluation period. Summary At the end of the 15 week performance evaluation period, data shows that addition of Bio-Regen Municipal will significantly reduce high NH 3 -N levels in extended aeration treatment plants. On-going application in other facilities (sequencing batch reactors - SBR, conventional activated sludge, etc.) has also shown a considerable reduction of ammonia. Identifiable benefits of using BRM were: Rapid Regulatory Compliance Low application cost Low cost of feed equipment requirement and/or design Significant reduction or elimination of capital expense for plant improvements and/or expansion Simplicity of application Environmentally safe and non-hazardous to facility personnel Product shelf life of 3-years Page 3 of 6

Date (2004) Table 2 Influent and Effluent Analytical Data Effluent NH 3 -N Influent NH 3 -N Effluent CBOD 5 5-12 4.8 60 5 5-26 3.2 6 6-3 28 266 5 6-8 30 -- 6-23 14 256 9 6-29 36 -- 7-6* 55 220 6 7-13 3 -- 7-21 1.2 9 8-4 1.3 210 3 8-18 1.2 3 8-24 0.5 -- 9-1 1.2 260 4 9-14 1.3 4 10-7 0.8 200 4 10-20 1.1 6 *BRM addition started on 7-6-2004 Page 4 of 6

Figure 1 Bio-Regen Reduction of Ammonia-N Note: Bio-Regen addition started on Day 56 (July 6. 2004) 300 250 Influent Ammonia-N 200 150 100 Day 56 Addition 50 0 Effluent 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 Monitoring and Treatment Duration (Days) Page 5 of 6

Figure 2 Effluent NH 3 -N Reduction via Bio-Regen Municipal Addition 60 50 Effluent NH3-N 40 30 20 Bio-Regen Started Day 56 (7-6-04) Winter Discharge Limit, 8.4 mg/l Summer Discharge Limit, 2.8 mg/l 10 0 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 Days Page 6 of 6