Setting Specifications for Biotech Products

Similar documents
Justification of Specifications (JOS): What Product and Process Development was all About. Christopher A Bravery

European Medicines Agency Evaluation of Medicines for Human Use

Guideline on the Requirements for Quality Documentation Concerning Biological Investigational Medicinal Products in Clinical Trials

Basis for setting acceptance criteria

Harmonized Quality Requirements for Biotech Investigational Medicinal Products - A Regulator's View

Report on the expert workshop on setting specifications for biotech products

Preparing the CMC section of IMPD for biological/biotechnology derived substances

Recent experience in scientific advice and marketing authorisations

Clinical qualification of specifications - a Regulator s view

ICH Quality Implementation Working Group POINTS TO CONSIDER

Examples of regulatory expectations for analytical characterization and testing

Guideline on the requirements for quality documentation concerning biological investigational medicinal products in clinical trials

ICH Topic M 4 Q Location issues for Common Technical Document for the Registration of Pharmaceuticals for Human Use Quality Questions and Answers

Comparability: Regulatory Perspective

Guideline on the requirements for quality documentation concerning biological investigational medicinal products in clinical trials

Current Hotspots during CMC Evaluation a European Regulatory Perspective

MANUFACTURING CONTROL STRATEGY FOR CELL, GENE AND TISSUE PRODUCTS Christopher A Bravery

Early Development Best Practices for Stability- Regulatory Perspective

Regulatory perspective on setting clinically relevant specifications. Joslyn Brunelle, PhD Team Leader Office of Biotechnology Products

Implementation strategy of ICH Q3D guideline

Status of the ICH Q11 Guideline on Development and Manufacture of the Active Substance. Riccardo Luigetti Prague, 9 December 2009

A.1 Contents file 4 to 5 A.1 (1)

Control Strategy. Implementation of ICH Q8, Q9, Q10

MANUFACTURING CONTROL STRATEGY FOR CELL, GENE AND TISSUE PRODUCTS Christopher A Bravery

Considerations in Setting Specifications

ICH Q11 Development & manufacture of drug substances

Phase Appropriate GMPs for IMPs. Presented by: Karen S. Ginsbury For: IFF, October 31, Nov 02, 2017

CQAs for C&GT Products to Enable Comparability Assessment. Ben Thompson Snr Director, Biopharmaceutical CMC RA GlaxoSmithKline

Regulation of Active Pharmaceutical Ingredients (API)

Implementation strategy of ICH Q3D guideline

European reflections on reviewing NDAs and ANDAs for ICH Q3D elemental impurity compliance

Control strategy and validation. Emanuela Lacana PhD Office of Biotechnology Products CDER/FDA

How to Avoid Common Deficiencies in INDs and NDAs. Ramesh Raghavachari, Ph.D. Branch Chief, Branch IX ONDQA/OPS/CDER

דרישות איכות ורגולציה בשלבים הראשונים של תרפיה תאית ד"ר עפרה אקסלרוד המכון לביקורת ותקנים של חומרי רפואה יוני 2013

Guideline on the requirements for quality documentation concerning biological investigational medicinal products in clinical trials

PROCESS VALIDATION ROCHAPON WACHAROTAYANKUN, PH.D.

THE NEW QUALITY PARADIGM OPPORTUNITIES AND EXPECTATIONS IN ICH Q8 Q9 Q10 Q11 DR. FRITZ ERNI

Europe s new approach to assurance of API quality and its implications for manufacturers and producing countries

Case Study: Examples Relating to the Quality Control of Cell-based Products

Specifications. February 19, 2015, TOKYO, JAPAN. Takao Hayakawa, Ph.D. Director, Pharmaceutical Research and Technology Institute, Kindai University

EUROPEAN COMMISSION HEALTH AND CONSUMERS DIRECTORATE-GENERAL. This document is for consultation until 11 December 2015

EUROPEAN INDUSTRIAL PHARMACISTS GROUP. Guidance on CPD for QUALIFIED PERSONS

Guideline on process validation for the manufacture of biotechnology-derived active substances and data to be provided in the regulatory submission

Will ICH Q12 truly goes beyond Q8/11?? Opportunities and Challenges

1225 Eye Street NW, Ste. 400 Washington, DC 20005

Comparability Is Not a Nightmare, Just Think Ahead!

Similar biological medicinal product

Stability of Biological Products

ICH guideline Q11 on development and manufacture of drug substances (chemical entities and biotechnological/biological entities)

Development of non-substantially manipulated cell-based ATMPs 1 : flexibility introduced via the application of the risk-based approach

Regulatory expectations on impurities in drug substances - Pavia, October 2, Luisa Torchio Euticals SpA

EMPROVE For Raw and Starting Materials & For Filtration Devices and Single Use Systems. Jan Thomsen Warsaw, November 15 th, 2016

Regulatory requirements for early stage clinical trials with cell-based medicinal products. Christopher A Bravery

Challenges with Establishing a Control Strategy for Biosimilars

EU Regulatory Perspective and Expectations. Sven-Erik Hillver Senior expert, QWP delegate Medical Products Agency, Sweden

Adopted by CHMP for release for consultation 15 December Start of public consultation 15 December 2016

MEDICINES CONTROL COUNCIL

CMC Strategy Forum, Paris 2008

DECISION TREE #1: ESTABLISHING ACCEPTANCE CRITERION FOR A SPECIFIED IMPURITY IN A NEW DRUG SUBSTANCE

Guideline on requirements for the production and control of immunological veterinary medicinal products

Quality Issues for Clinical Trial Materials: The Chemistry, Manufacturing and Controls (CMC) Review

Guidelines on procedures and data requirements for changes to approved biotherapeutic products

Regulatory Expectations for Method Transfers: Health Canada's Perspective CMC Strategy Forum Methods on the move January 23, 2017

Comparability to establish Biosimilarity

GUIDELINES FOR INTRODUCING A LOCALLY MANUFACTURED NEW PHARMACEUTICAL PRODUCT ON THE UGANDA MARKET

FDA S GUIDANCE FOR INDUSTRY ANDAS: STABILITY TESTING OF DRUG SUBSTANCES AND PRODUCTS

Characterization of Biotechnology Products: A Regulatory Perspective

STABILITY TESTING OF NEW DRUG SUBSTANCES AND PRODUCTS

SESSION 11 Stability Data Evaluate, Set Specifications and Prepare Reports

Consultation by a notified body on an ancillary medicinal substance integrated in a medical device

Guideline on Similar Biological Medicinal Products

Q8 Pharmaceutical Development

APPLYING SCIENTIFIC CONSIDERATIONS AND STATISTICAL APPROACHES IN ANALYTICAL SIMILARITY ASSESSMENT

Regulatory considerations for Global Haplobank

MHRA Telephone Ref: 1099/Flutcore Ms Nathalie Gilmore Direct line: (0)

Vaccine World MENA & CIS 2014, Istanbul Quality-by-Design (QbD) in Vaccine development

How to ensure the Stability of Products in Clinical Trials an Industry Perspective. Volker Schnaible

Synopsis: FDA Process Validation Guidance

Inspection. Implementation of ICH Q8, Q9, Q10

Introduction to CMC Regulatory Affairs

Future of Question-based Review and Regulatory Submissions

Current version 13 October 2016

Structure and content of an IMPD. What is required for first into man trial?

MANUFACTURE OF INVESTIGATIONAL MEDICINAL PRODUCTS

A GUIDELINE ON DOSSIER REQUIREMENTS FOR TYPE I VARIATIONS November 1999

Comparability for Advanced Therapy Medicinal Products. Christopher A Bravery

Notice Our file number:

Session 2-Product Design FIM to commercial for a lyophilised (NBE) product Michael Siedler, Abbvie

Post-Approval Change Regulations in Japan

Good Manufacturing Practices Purpose and Principles of GMP. Tony Gould

CMC Strategy Forum Europe May Killarney, Ireland.

ICH guideline Q12 on technical and regulatory considerations for pharmaceutical product lifecycle management - Annexes

The Ever-increasing Complexity of Biotech Changes - A Pledge for Global Convergence

COMMITTEE FOR VETERINARY MEDICINAL PRODUCTS NOTE FOR GUIDANCE: MANUFACTURE OF THE FINISHED DOSAGE FORM

NIRS, PAT, RTR testing EU experience and regulatory perspective

The procedure of Certification of Suitability to the Monographs of the European Pharmacopoeia (CEP) and the EDQM Inspection Programme

PROPOSAL FOR REVISION OF THE SUPPLEMENTARY GUIDELINES ON GOOD MANUFACTURING PRACTICES: VALIDATION, APPENDIX 7:NON-STERILE PROCESS VALIDATION

31 August Dear Dr. Bursikova,

Transcription:

Setting Specifications for Biotech Products Session 1: What to Control? Presentation by an EU Regulator Nanna Aaby Kruse, Senior Biological Assessor, member of BWP and BMWP

WHAT TO CONTROL? Control of process parameters Control of raw and starting materials TOTAL QUALITY CONTROL Control of cell substrate & cell bank Product Process Kowid Ho, Afssaps 2 Validated manufacturing process Good manufacturing Practice Control of DS and DP (characterization, specification, stability) Safe and Efficacious product Consistent and stable

A control system is mandatory GMP, Directive 2003/94/EC, Article 11 Manufacturer shall establish and maintain a quality control system.. What to control Directive 2001/83/EC, Annex 1 Dossier requirements for a MAA Manufacturing process of the active substance(s) Tests and acceptance criteria carried out at every critical step, information on the quality and control of intermediates and process validation and/or valuation studies shall be provided as apropriate Control of the active substance(s) Detailed information on the specification used for routine control of active substance(s), justification for the choice of these specifications, methods of analysis and their validation shall be provided. Control of the finished medicinal product 3 Detailed information on the specification, (release and shelf life) justification for their choice, methods of analysis and their validation shall be provided

What to control? - ICH Q6B Specification is defined as a list of tests, references to analytical procedures and appropriate acceptance criteria. Specifications are chosen to confirm the quality of the drug substance and drug product rather than to establish full characterisation and should focus on those molecular and biological characteristics found to be useful in ensuring the safety and efficacy of the product. The methods are picked from a wide range of methods used during characterisation Acceptance criteria are set based on data obtained from lots used to demonstrate manufacturing consistency, data from stability studies and data from batches used in clinical trials 4

What to control? - ICH Q6B Specifications are one part of a total control strategy designed to ensure product quality and consistency. Other parts of this strategy include thorough product characterisation during development, upon which many of the specifications are based, adherence to Good Manufacturing Practices, a validated manufacturing process, raw materials testing, in-process testing, stability testing, etc. The quality of the raw materials used in the production of the drug substance (or drug product) should meet standards, appropriate for their intended use. The quality of the excipients used in the drug product formulation (and in some cases, in the drug substance), as well as the container/closure systems, should meet pharmacopoeial standards, where available and appropriate. Otherwise, suitable acceptance criteria should be established for the nonpharmacopoeial excipients. 5

What to control? -ICH Q6B Specifications are one part of a total control strategy. In-process tests are performed at critical decision making steps and at other steps where data serve to confirm consistency of the process during the production of either the drug substance or the drug product. The results of inprocess testing may be recorded as action limits or reported as acceptance criteria. Performing such testing may eliminate the need for testing of the drug substance or drug product 6

What to control? - ICH Q6B Since specifications are chosen to confirm the quality rather than to characterise the product, the manufacturer should provide the rationale and justification for including and/or excluding testing for specific quality attributes. Generally, the following tests and acceptance criteria are considered applicable to all drug substance and drug product: Appearance and description Identity Purity and Impurity Potency 7 Quantity

Quality Attributes (QA).! ICH Q8(R2) A physical, chemical, biological or microbiological property or characteristic that should be within an appropriate limit, range, or distribution to ensure the desired product quality. Potential Critical QA (CQA)is identified during development and finally defined at time of Marketing Application How to track levels of CQA s retrospectively if not initially recognized and therefore not monitored? 8 How does new knowledge and/or experience change and/or improve the specification during product lifecycle?

9 Quality Attributes Where to draw the line between critical or not? Do we need a line? What is the most appropriate tools? Should critical quality attributes by default be included in the specification?... Is it 9 always relevant Criticality, or not, of a given quality attribute is strongly linked to the riskassessment tool chosen

Personal view on Risk-Assessment tools: Preliminary Preliminary Hazards Analysis Hazards Analysis Risk Ranking Criticality = Severity x Likelihood Criticality= Impact x Uncertainty Impurity safety factor ISF = LD50 Level in Product Dose 10

What to control What to put into the dossier? Information provided in the dossier for review Information and knowledge within the Company. Some parts accessible at inspections Is a Minimum Control System needed to safeguard against unpredicted events and to provide consistency measures? 11

In-process-, Drug Substance and/or Drug Product control? Protein content ph Bioburden Impurities Extractable volume Excipients content Potency Glycosylation Purity Monomer and Aggregates Endotoxin Particulate matter Sterility Case by Case, - as justified by process development, understanding of process and product relationship, quality risk management and the control strategy applied. 12 Identity

Thank you for your attention 13