Food Safety Audit Ranch V07.04 Rev. 1

Similar documents
Food Safety Audit Ranch V07.04 Rev. 1

Food Safety Audit. Ranch v06.11 * Foreman/Contact:

Food Safety Audit. Greenhouse Audit v Foreman/Contact: City/Location: State: Country: G.P.S.: Commodities: Customer: Grower: Ranch/Farm Name:

PrimusLabs.com Sub Contracted Audit (63717) Ranch v06.11 *

Preparation Sheet to Assist in Developing a GAP Program Relating to PrimusLabs Ranch/ Farm Audit Version 07.04

PrimusGFS - Checklist - v 2.1

Ver en Español Operation: Ranch CB Registration No. PLc PGFS PrimusGFS Final Report (Certified) PrimusGFS ID #45093 Cert:3 Version 1.

Farm GAP Policy Manual (for compliance with Primus Labs GAP Audit version Rev.1)

Farm GAP Policy Manual (for compliance with Primus Labs GAP Audit version Rev.1)

Food Safety Audit Harvest Crew v07.04

PrimusGFS Standard V2.1-2 Nov 2015

Revision 1. CB Registration No.PA-PGFS PrimusGFS ID # Cert:5 Audited by Primus Auditing Operations

Preparing for the Farm-Ranch Audit

Low Risk Medium Risk High Risk My Risk Land is fenced virgin. Land has been used for prairie that has not been

Introduction The Safe Food Risk Assessment

FOOD SAFETY MODERNIZATION ACT GOOD AGRICULTURAL PRACTICES EDUCATIONAL OUTREACH SEMINARS

PrimusGFS Audit GAP (Module 2) Guidelines

Land # Section, Number Question Doc Points Page # 1 General, #P-1 A documented food safety program that

Checklist. PrimusGFS v3.0 TABLE 2: IRRIGATION / WATER USE. PRIMUSGFS v3.0 TABLE 2: IRRIGATION / WATER USE. (Including Question Applicability Table)

FOOD SAFETY PROGRAM JANUARY 30, 31 & FEBRUARY 1

New England Farm Plan: General Questions, Farm Review, Field Harvesting and Packing

Food Safety Basics for Small Farms. Jennifer Sowerwine, ESPM Dept. UC Berkeley

Food Safety Plan. Name of Farm/Orchard. Farm mailing address City State Zip Code. GPS coordinates (optional) Longitude Latitude

Introduction The Safe Food Risk Assessment

Good Agricultural Practices. Food Safety Plan. for. Name of Farm/Orchard

California. California. Food Safety Guidelines. Food Safety Guidelines

Scale of difficulty 1 very easy -- 5 very difficult. What do you think it will cost to change? YES NO N/A

Questions & Expectations

Costco Produce Addendum for Harvest Crew Audits

Food Safety Plan. (Farm name) DRAFT

PrimusLabs Audit (206195) Harvest Crew v07.04

This is a Grower Manual for Documentation for a USDA GAP audit Part 1

FIELD AUDITING PROGRAM STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURES SOP

Example Food Safety Plan. Florida Citrus Operation. Updated April 15, The development of a Food Safety Plan with Good Agricultural Practices

General Questions (Implementation of a food safety program, traceability, and worker health and hygiene)

HARMONIZED FOOD SAFETY STANDARD: PART 1: FIELD OPERATIONS AND HARVESTING (Version 3)

Developing a Plan for Third-Party Audits. Good Agricultural Practices (GAPs)

Minimizing microbial contamination in primary production of fruits, vegetables, herbs and spices

Title: PSU Take-Home Training for Professional Standards: Good Agricultural Practices

AMERICAN MUSHROOM INSTITUTE MGAPS AUDIT Rev

USDA Good Agricultural Practices Good Handling Practices Audit Verification Checklist

PART III - BI FARMING OF PLANTS. GFSI BENCHMARKING REQUIREMENTS GFSI Guidance Document Version 7.2

Good Agricultural Practices & Good Handling Practices Program. Water Quality Issues Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)

Matt Lollar & Bob Hochmuth University of Florida/IFAS Extension

FARM FOOD SAFETY PLAN TEMPLATE

Copyright United Fresh Produce Association. All rights reserved.

COMMODITY SPECIFIC FOOD SAFETY GUIDELINES FOR THE PRODUCTION AND HARVEST OF LETTUCE AND LEAFY GREENS

FSMA S PRODUCE SAFETY RULE

3.0 Restrooms and Sewage (Answers G- 9, G- 10, 1-6, )

Requirement Procedure Verification Corrective Action 1. General 1.1. Management Responsibility A food safety policy shall be in place.

PrimusGFS Audit GAP (Module 2) Guidelines

SENATE BILL No Introduced by Senator Florez. February 7, 2007

Food Safety Modernization Act (FSMA) Proposed Sec. 105 Produce Rule

FSMA Produce Rule Summary for Midwest Orchards

Welcome Food Safety/Harvest Practices Module One

FOOD SAFETY/HARVEST PRACTICES

CALIFORNIA AVOCADO INDUSTRY Good Agricultural Practices (GAP) Manual -Farm Review-

GAP / GHP Audits. Bernie DiBattista NYS Dept. of Agriculture & Markets Albany, NY

Produce GAPs Harmonized Food Safety Standard Field Operations & Harvesting - USDA Checklist AUDITEE INFORMATION

COMMODITY SPECIFIC FOOD SAFETY GUIDELINES FOR THE PRODUCTION AND HARVEST OF LETTUCE AND LEAFY GREENS VERSION 4 - ARIZONA

BAMCO Food Safety Guidelines

Welcome Food Safety/Harvest Practices Module One Version 2.6 March 2017

PrimusLabs.com Version Greenhouse Audit Guidelines

Community Alliance with Family Farmers

Good Agricultural Practices (GAPs)

Module 2: GAPs Field Practices

General Checklist Implementation of a Food Safety Program

BUY LOCAL, BUY SAFELY!

Food Safety Programs and Auditing Protocol for the Fresh Tomato Supply Chain Open Field Harvest and Packing Checklist

PART III - AI FARMING OF ANIMALS. GFSI BENCHMARKING REQUIREMENTS GFSI Guidance Document Version 7.1

Food Safety Modernization Act Oklahoma Training Programs. Lynn Brandenberger Department of Horticulture and Landscape Architecture

CALIFORNIA AVOCADO COMMISSION FOOD SAFETY MANUAL VERSION 3.0

Module 1: Introduction to Produce Safety

Pecan Production and the Food Safety Modernization Act (FSMA)

Tomato Food Safety Protocol Greenhouse Checklist Food Safety Programs and Auditing Protocol Fresh Tomato Supply Chain, 2009 (Version 08, Apr 11)

California Leafy Greens Handlers Marketing Agreement (CA LGMA) Water Provisions

GGAP Applicable Regulations for HPSS

Food Safety Programs and Auditing Protocol for the Fresh Tomato Supply Chain Open Field Harvest and Packing

2014 RIGAP Program Guidelines

Amy Schober Food & Nutrition Service, Office of Food Safety Mike Morrelli Agricultural Marketing Service Christina Conell Food & Nutrition Service,

Broccoli Produce Safety Part I: Produce Safety Overview Elizabeth A. Bihn, Ph.D. Produce Safety Alliance, Director Cornell University Part II: Post

Developing a Plan for Third-Party Audits. Good Agricultural Practices (GAPs)

Food Safety Modernization Act. Final Rules

A basic GAP program for keeping pecans safe & wholesome

Food Safety Programs and Auditing Protocol for the Fresh Tomato Supply Chain, 2019

Part A Whole Farm Evaluation

GLOBALG.A.P Version Updates Presentation by: Matt Lomeli Food Safety Auditor

Audited By NSF International (308028) Costco Produce Harvest Crew Addendum v

PrimusLabs.com Version Harvest Crew Audit Guidelines

Good Agricultural Practices (GAP) for Fresh Fruit and Vegetable Growers. Water

Food Safety Begins on the Farm: A Grower Self Assessment of Food Safety Risks. U-Pick Operations U-PICK OPERATIONS

Produce GAPs Harmonized Food Safety Standard Field Operations & Harvesting - USDA Checklist AUDITEE INFORMATION

OECS GAP CERTIFICATION PROTOCOL FOR THE PRODUCTION OF FRESH FRUITS AND VEGETABLES

USDA GAP/GHP and HGAP Recertification: Guidance for Producers

Code of Good Agricultural Practices (GAP) for Corn INTRODUCTION

GROWERS HANDBOOK GOOD AGRICULTURAL PRACTICES

CALIFORNIA CITRUS HARVESTING GOOD AGRICULTURAL PRACTICES (GAP)

PART III - AI FARMING OF ANIMALS

CATALOG OF LOG SHEETS AND PROCEDURES For more information, please refer to

Note: Statements in parenthesis and in italics refer to a log, sign or additional information at the end of each section.

Transcription:

Food Safety Audit Ranch V7.4 Rev. 1 Auditor: Date Sent: Audit Start: Time/Date:: * Date Received: Audit End: Time/Date:: Foreman/Contact: City/Location: State: Country: G.P.S.: Commodities: Customer: Grower: Ranch/Farm Name: Buyer: Template pagename 1 of 27Ranch V7.4 Rev. 1 Ranch V7.4 Rev. 1 Printed 28/2 4::29 PM

Self Inspection Max. point value Verified 1.1 Have Good Agricultural Practices (GAP) manuals covering each growing area within the scope of this audit (e.g., growing operation, orchard, vineyard) been developed and are they available for review? 1.2 Have documented Good Agricultural Practices (GAP)self-audits been completed for each growing area that is within the scope of this audit (e.g. growing operation, orchard, vineyard)? 7 Traceability Max. point value Verified 2.1 Is the growing area(s) adequately identified or coded to enable trace back and trace forward in the event of a recall? Ground History Max. point value Verified 3.1 Were farming area(s) used for growing food crops for human consumption last season? 3.2 Has the growing area(s) been used for any non-agricultural functions? If No, go to 3.3 7 page 2 of 27 Ranch V7.4 Rev. 1

3.2a If the land had been used previously for non-agricultural functions have soil tests been conducted showing soil was negative or within an appropriate regulatory agency's approved limits for contaminants? 3.3 Has the growing area(s) been used for animal husbandry or grazing land for animals? If No, go to 3.4 7 3.3a If the land was used previously for animal husbandry or grazing land for livestock, has a risk evaluation been performed? 3.4 Is there any evidence of animal activity in the crop that is a potential food safety risk? 2 3. Has flooding from uncontrolled causes occurred on the growing area(s) since the previous growing season? If No, go to 3.6 3.a If the growing area(s) and product was affected from the flood waters, is there documented evidence that corrective measures were taken to affected land and product? 3.b Have soil tests been conducted on the flooded area(s) showing soil was negative or within an appropriate regulatory agency's approved limits for contaminants? 2 3.6 Is the growing operation under organic principles? If No, go to 3.7 page 3 of 27 Ranch V7.4 Rev. 1

3.6a Is current certification by an accredited organic certification organization on file and available for review? 3.7 If the growing area(s) is a new purchase or lease, has a documented risk assessment been undertaken? Adjacent Land Use Max. point value Verified 4.1 Is the adjacent land to the growing area a possible source of contamination from intensive livestock production (e.g. feed lots, dairy operations, poultry houses, meat rendering operation)? If No, go to 4.2 4.1a Have appropriate measures been taken to mitigate this possible contamination source onto the growing area (e.g. buffer areas, physical barriers, fences, ditches, etc.)? 4.2 Are, or is there evidence of domestic animals, wild animals, grazing lands (includes homes with hobby farms, and non commercial livestock) in proximity to growing operation? If No, go to 4.3 4.2a Have physical measures been put in place to restrain domestic animals, grazing lands, (includes homes with hobby farms, and non commercial livestock) and their waste from entering the growing area (e.g. vegetative strips, wind breaks, physical barriers, berms, fences, diversion ditches.)? 4.2b Is there a written policy supported by visual evidence that domestic, livestock, or wild animals are not allowed in the growing area? Note: This includes any packaging or equipment storage areas. page 4 of 27 Ranch V7.4 Rev. 1

4.2c Are measures in place to reduce or limit the animal intrusion (i.e., monitoring field perimeter for signs of intrusion)? 4.3 Are untreated animal manure piles, compost, biosolids, or nonsynthetic amendment stored and/or applied on adjacent land? If No, go to 4.4 4.3a Have physical measures been taken to secure untreated animal manure piles, compost, biosolids, or nonsynthetic amendment stored and/or applied on adjacent land? 4.3b If biosolids are stored and/or applied on adjacent land, has the adjacent landowner supplied paperwork confirming the biosolids meet prevailing guidelines, governmental, or local standards? 4.4 Is the growing area situated in a higher risk location where contamination could occur from nearby operations or functions (e.g. leach fields, runoff or potential flooding from sewers, toilet systems, industrial facilities, labor camps)? If No, go to 4. 4.4a Have appropriate measures been taken to mitigate risks related to nearby operations? 4. Is there a documented and implemented policy that infant or toddler aged children are not allowed in the growing area? NOTE: This includes any packaging or equipment storage areas. Fertilizer/Crop Nutrition Max. point value Verified page of 27 Ranch V7.4 Rev. 1

.1 Is untreated human sewage sludge used in the growing cycle? If this question is answered Yes, automatic failure of this audit will result. 2.2 Is compost produced from animal derived materials used by the grower? If No, go to.3.2a Are compost applications incorporated into the soil prior to planting or bud burst for tree crops and not applied during the growing season?.2b Are there compost use records available for each growing area, including application records which shows that the interval between application and harvest was not less than 4 days?.2c Are there Certificate(s) of Analysis (CoA) from the compost supplier(s) that covers pathogen and heavy metal testing (plus any other legally/best practice required testing) and does the grower have relevant letters of guarantee regarding SOP's and logs? 2.3 Are biosolids used? If No, go to.4. NOTE: Special attention to commodity specific guidelines rules (e.g., Californian Leafy Greens) which ban the use of biosolids, see.3d.3a Are biosolids incorporated into the soil prior to planting or bud burst for tree crops and not applied during the growing season?.3b Are the grower's biosolids use records available for each growing area, especially application records? page 6 of 27 Ranch V7.4 Rev. 1

.3c Are there a Certificate(s) of Analysis (COA) from the biosolid supplier(s) certifying compliance with prevailing national/ local standards and guidelines? If this question is answered No, automatic failure of this audit will result. 2.3d Are biosolids being applied to crops where the country of production regulations/guidelines ban the use such materials e.g. Leafy Green Commodity Specific Guidelines in California? If this question is answered Yes, automatic failure of this audit will result. 2.4 Is untreated animal manure used? If No, go to.. NOTE: Special attention to commodity specific guidelines rules (e.g., Californian Leafy Green Commodity Specific Guidelines) which ban the use of untreated animal manures. See.4d.4a Is untreated animal manure incorporated into the soil prior to planting or bud burst for tree crops and not applied during the growing season? 2.4b Are there untreated animal manure records available for each growing area including application records which shows that the interval between application and harvest was not less than 12 days (unless more stringent laws or guidelines exist)?.4c Are there Certificate(s) of Analysis (COA), specification or some other document available for review provided by the untreated animal manure supplier stating the components of the material? 2.4d Are untreated animal manures being applied to crops where the country regulations/guidelines ban the use such materials (e.g., Californian Leafy Green Commodity Specific Guidelines)? If this question is answered Yes, automatic failure of this audit will result. 2. Are other nonsynthetic crop treatments used (e.g. compost teas, fish emulsions, fish meal, blood meal,"bio fertilizers")? If No, go to.6 page 7 of 27 Ranch V7.4 Rev. 1

.a Are nonsynthetic treatments that contain animal products or animal manures applied to the edible portions crops?.b Are nonsynthetic crop treatment records available for each growing area including application records demonstrating the interval between application and harvest was not less than 4 days?.c Are there Certificate(s) of Analysis available from the nonsynthetic crop treatment suppliers that covers pathogen and heavy metal testing (plus any other legally/best practice required testing)? 2.6 Are any soil amendments (except inorganic nutrients/fertilizers) used that do not contain animal products and/or animal manures? If No, go to.7.6a Are the grower's soil amendment (except inorganic nutrients/fertilizers that do not contain animal products and/or animal manures) records available for review including application records?.6b Are there Certificate(s) of Analysis (COA) and/or letters of guarantee stating that the materials used are free from animal products and/or animal manures? 2.7 Are inorganic fertilizers used? If No, go to.8.7a Are the grower's inorganic fertilizer records available for review including application records? page 8 of 27 Ranch V7.4 Rev. 1

.7b Are there Certificate(s) of Analysis (COA), letters of guarantee or some other documents from the inorganic fertilizer supplier(s) that specifies the source of all the ingredients including inert materials? 7.8 If fertilizers and/or fertilizer containers are stored on the property, are they stored in a manner to prevent contamination to the growing area(s) or any of water sources? 3 Irrigation/Water Use Max. point value Verified 6.1 Does the growing operation practice dryland farming? If No, go to 6.2. 6.1a If the growing operation practices dryland farming, are there water systems used in the growing operation to supply for crop needs such as crop protection/fertilizer applications, and frost or freeze prevention program? If No, go to 6.2 6.1b Are microbiological tests, including Generic E.coli conducted on water used for crop protection/fertilizer applications, and frost or freeze prevention program? If No, go to 6.1d. 2 6.1c Are the microbiological tests current and conducted at the required and/or expected frequencies? 6.1d Do written procedures (SOPs) exist covering proper sampling protocols which include how samples should be identified? page 9 of 27 Ranch V7.4 Rev. 1

6.1e Do written procedures (SOPs) exist covering corrective measures for unsuitable or abnormal water testing results? 6.1f If unsuitable or abnormal results have been detected, have documented corrective measures been performed? 2 6.2 Is the water used for the growing operation sourced from Municipal or District water pipeline systems? If No, go to 6.3 6.2a Are microbiological tests, including Generic E.coli conducted on water used for crop protection/fertilizer applications, and frost or freeze prevention program? If No, go to 6.2c. 2 6.2b Are the microbiological tests current and conducted at the required and/or expected frequencies? 6.2c Do written procedures (SOPs) exist covering proper sampling protocols? 6.2d Do written procedures (SOPs) exist covering corrective measures for unsuitable or abnormal water testing results? 6.2e If unsuitable or abnormal results have been detected, have documented corrective measures been performed? 2 page of 27 Ranch V7.4 Rev. 1

6.2f Are the crops irrigated by a micro irrigation or drip system? 6.2g Is overhead irrigation used to irrigate the crop or as part of a frost or freeze prevention program? NOTE: "Irrigating the crop" refers to irrigation during the mature growing cycle. This does not include pre-planting or just after planting to create a stand. 6.2h Are the crops irrigated by flood irrigation or a furrow system? 6.2i Are the crops sub irrigated (also known as seepage irrigation)? 6.3 Is the water used in the growing operation sourced from wells? If No, go to 6.4 6.3a Are all well heads an adequate distance from untreated manure? 6.3b Is the well designed to prevent contamination? 6.3c Is it evident that the well(s) is free from contamination issues and are measures taken to minimize contamination of wells? page 11 of 27 Ranch V7.4 Rev. 1

6.3d Are records kept for periodic inspections and treatment of wells (if performed) available for review? 7 6.3e Are microbiological tests, including Generic E.coli conducted on water used for irrigation, crop protection/fertilizer applications, and frost or freeze prevention program? If No, go to 6.3g 2 6.3f Are the microbiological tests current and conducted at the required and/or expected frequencies? 6.3g Do written procedures (SOPs) exist covering proper sampling protocols? 6.3h Do written procedures (SOPs) exist covering corrective measures for unsuitable or abnormal water testing results? 6.3i If unsuitable or abnormal results have been detected, have documented corrective measures been performed? 2 6.3j Are the crops irrigated by a micro irrigation or drip system? 6.3k Is overhead irrigation used to irrigate the crop or as part of a frost or freeze prevention program? NOTE: "Irrigating the crop" refers to irrigation during the mature growing cycle. This does not include pre-planting or just after planting to create a stand. page 12 of 27 Ranch V7.4 Rev. 1

6.3l Are the crops irrigated by flood irrigation or a furrow system? 6.3m Are the crops sub irrigated (also known as seepage irrigation)? 6.4 Is the water used in the growing operation sourced from ponds, reservoirs, watersheds or other surface water source? If No, go to 6. 6.4a Is surface water in adequate distance from untreated manure? 6.4b Do animals (domestic, livestock, or wild) have access to the water source? 7 6.4c Is it evident that the water source is free of contamination issues and are measures taken to minimize contamination of the water source? 6.4d Are records kept for the periodic visual inspections and disinfection treatments (if used) available for review? 7 6.4e Are microbiological tests, including Generic E.coli conducted on water used for irrigation, crop protection/fertilizer applications, and frost or freeze prevention program? If No, go to 6.4g 2 page 13 of 27 Ranch V7.4 Rev. 1

6.4f Are the microbiological tests current and conducted at the required and/or expected frequencies? 6.4g Do written procedures (SOPs) exist covering proper sampling protocols? 6.4h Do written procedures (SOPs) exist covering corrective measures for unsuitable or abnormal water testing results? 6.4i If unsuitable or abnormal results have been detected, have documented corrective measures been performed? 2 6.4j Are the crops irrigated by a micro irrigation or drip system? 6.4k Is overhead irrigation used to irrigate the crop or as part of a frost or freeze prevention program? NOTE: "Irrigating the crop" refers to irrigation during the mature growing cycle. This does not include pre-planting or just after planting to create a stand. 6.4l Are the crops irrigated by flood irrigation or a furrow system? 6.4m Are the crops sub irrigated (also known as seepage irrigation)? page 14 of 27 Ranch V7.4 Rev. 1

6. Is the water used in the growing operation sourced from canals, rivers, ditches, or other open flowing water systems? If No, go to 6.6 6.a Is surface water in adequate distance from untreated manure? 6.b Is the water source under the direction of a water authority or district? 6.c Do animals (domestic, livestock, or wild) have access to the water source? 7 6.d Is it evident that the water source is free of contamination issues and are measures taken to minimize contamination of the water source? 6.e Are records kept for periodic visual inspection and disinfection (if occurring) of the water source and available for review? 7 6.f Are microbial tests, including Generic E.coli conducted on water used for irrigation, crop protection/fertilizer applications, and frost or freeze prevention program? If No, go to 6.h 2 6.g Are the microbiological tests current and conducted at the required and/or expected frequencies? page of 27 Ranch V7.4 Rev. 1

6.h Do written procedures (SOPs) exist covering proper sampling protocols? 6.i Do written procedures (SOPs) exist covering corrective measures for unsuitable or abnormal water testing results? 6.j If unsuitable or abnormal results have been detected, have documented corrective measures been performed? 2 6.k Are the crops irrigated by a micro irrigation or drip system? 6.l Is overhead irrigation used to irrigate the crop or as part of a frost or freeze prevention program? NOTE: "Irrigating the crop" refers to irrigation during the mature growing cycle. This does not include pre-planting or just after planting to create a stand. 6.m Are the crops irrigated by flood irrigation or furrow system? 6.n Are the crops sub irrigated (also known as seepage irrigation)? 6.6 Is reclaimed water used in the growing operation? NOTE: This refers to wastewater that has gone through a treatment process. If No, go to 6.7. page 16 of 27 Ranch V7.4 Rev. 1

6.6a Is the reclamation process under the direction of a water reclamation management or authority? 6.6b Are microbial control measures for reclaimed water utilized? 6.6c Are microbial tests, including Generic E.coli conducted on water used for irrigation, crop protection/fertilizer applications, and frost or freeze prevention program? If No, go to 6.6e 2 6.6d Are the microbiological tests current and conducted at the required and/or expected frequencies? 6.6e Do written procedures (SOPs) exist covering proper sampling protocols? 6.6f Do written procedures (SOPs) exist covering corrective measures for unsuitable or abnormal water testing results? 6.6g If unsuitable or abnormal results have been detected, have documented corrective measures been performed? 2 6.6h Are the crops irrigated by a micro irrigation or drip system? page 17 of 27 Ranch V7.4 Rev. 1

6.6i Is overhead irrigation used to irrigate the crop or as part of a frost or freeze prevention program? NOTE: "Irrigating the crop" refers to irrigation during the mature growing cycle. This does not include pre-planting or just after planting to create a stand. 6.6j Are the crops irrigated by flood irrigation or a furrow system? 6.6k Are the crops sub irrigated (also known as seepage irrigation)? 6.7 Are tail water (run off water) systems used in the growing operation? If No, go to 6.8. 6.7a Is tail water in adequate distance from untreated manure? 6.7b Do animals (domestic, livestock, or wild) have access to the tail water systems? 7 6.7c Is it evident that the water source is free of contamination issues and are measures taken to minimize contamination of the tail water system? 6.7d Are records kept for periodic visual inspection and disinfection (if occurring) of the water source and available for review? 7 page 18 of 27 Ranch V7.4 Rev. 1

6.7e Are microbial tests conducted, including Generic E.coli on water used for irrigation, crop protection/fertilizer applications, and frost or freeze prevention program? If No, go to 6.7g 2 6.7f Are the microbiological tests current and conducted at the required and/or expected frequencies? 6.7g Do written procedures (SOPs) exist covering proper sampling protocols? 6.7h Do written procedures (SOPs) exist covering corrective measures for unsuitable or abnormal water testing results? 6.7i If unsuitable or abnormal results have been detected, have documented corrective measures been performed? 2 6.7j Are the crops irrigated by a micro irrigation or drip system? 6.7k Is overhead irrigation used to irrigate the crop or as part of a frost or freeze prevention program? NOTE: "Irrigating the crop" refers to irrigation during the mature growing cycle. This does not include pre-planting or just after planting to create a stand. 6.7l Are the crops irrigated by flood irrigation or furrow system? page 19 of 27 Ranch V7.4 Rev. 1

6.7m Are the crops sub irrigated (also known as seepage irrigation)? 6.8 Are check valves, anti-siphon devices, or other back flow prevention systems in use when and where necessary? 6.9 Is irrigation equipment not in use free from pest contamination and stored clean off the ground? Crop Protection Max. point value Verified 7.1 Is there a documented policy and/or procedures for the mixing/loading of crop protection materials? 7.1a Is mixing, loading, or the dilution of crop protection materials performed safely and within a distance where the growing area and water sources are not affected? 7 7.2 Is there a documented policy and/or procedures for the rinsing and cleaning of crop protection equipment? 7.2a Is rinsing and cleaning of crop protection equipment performed safely and within a distance where land and water sources are not affected? 7 page 2 of 27 Ranch V7.4 Rev. 1

7.3 Is there documentation that shows the individual(s) making decisions for crop protection are qualified? 7.4 Is there documentation that shows employees who handle crop protection materials are trained or are under the supervision of a trained individual? 7. Does the growing operation follow a pesticide application recording program? If No, go to 7.6 If this question is answered No, automatic failure of this audit will result. 2 7.a Are crop protection application records up to date and available for review? 7.6 Are crop protection materials registered in the country of use for the target crop where official registration is in place? If this question is answered Yes, skip to question 7.7. If no official registration system is utilized answer this question N/A and go to 7.6a. Where a system exists, but a crop protection chemical being used is not registered for the target crop either "in country" or by extrapolation (see 7.6a), the response to this question is No. If this question is answered No, automatic failure of this audit will result. 2 7.6a Does the country of production allow the use of crop protection materials that are registered for the target crop in another country, as long as the use of this material does not contravene any prevailing national and local laws in the destination country (e.g. maximum residue limit, banned lists, etc.)? If this question is answered No, automatic failure of this audit will result. 2 7.7 Are crop protection applications restricted by the guidelines established by the product label, manufacturer recommendation, or by prevailing national/ local standards and guidelines? If this question is answered No, automatic failure of this audit will result. 2 page 21 of 27 Ranch V7.4 Rev. 1

7.8 Where harvesting is restricted by pre-harvest intervals (as required on the crop protection chemical product labels, manufacturer recommendations and/or by prevailing national/ local standards) is the grower adhering to these pre-harvest interval time periods? If this question is answered No, automatic failure of this audit will result. 2 7.9 Are employee re-entry intervals established as required by the pesticide label, manufacturer recommendation, or by prevailing national/ local standards and guidelines? 7. When crop protection applications occur, does posting take place on area of treatment according to prevailing national/ local standards and guidelines? 7.11 To avoid drift, are crop protection applications restricted when gusts are excessive? 7.12 If crop protection containers are stored on the property (even temporarily), are they stored in a manner to prevent contamination and disposed of responsibly? 7.13 Have documented policies and/or procedures been developed for the monitoring of crop protection application equipment (e.g. calibration procedures, inspections, replacement)? 7.13a Is it evident that the equipment used for crop protection applications is in good working order? Employee Hygiene (This applies to on-the-farm staff not the harvesting staff) Max. point value Verified page 22 of 27 Ranch V7.4 Rev. 1

8.1 Does the growing operation have a documented and implemented policy for dealing with employees who appear to be physically ill, or become ill while working? 8.2 Does the growing operation have a documented and implemented policy regarding employees with open sores and wounds? 8.3 Does the growing operation have a documented and implemented procedure in place requiring for all commodities that come in contact with blood to be destroyed? If this question is answered No, automatic failure of this audit will result. 2 8.4 Does the growing operation have documented and implemented policies prohibiting eating, drinking (including gum chewing) using tobacco in the growing area? 8. Is there a food safety hygiene training program covering new and existing employees and are there records of these training events? 8.6 Are there operational toilet facilities provided? If NO, go to 8.7. If this question is answered No, the audit will result in an automatic failure. 2 8.6a Are the toilet facilities placed within ¼ mile or minutes walking distance of all employees? 8.6b Are toilet facilities in a suitable location to prevent contamination to the growing area? page 23 of 27 Ranch V7.4 Rev. 1

8.6c Is a minimum of one toilet facility provided for each group of 2 employees? 8.6d Do toilet facilities have visuals or signs, written in the appropriate languages, reminding employees to wash their hands before returning to work? 2 8.6e Are the toilets maintained in a clean and sanitary condition and are there records showing toilet cleaning, servicing and stocking is occurring regularly? 8.6f Are the catch basins of the toilets designed and maintained to prevent contamination in the field (e.g. free from leaks and cracks)? 8.6g Is there is a documented and implemented procedure for emptying the catch basin in a hygienic manner and also in a way that prevent product, packaging, equipment and water system contamination? 8.7 Is there evidence of fecal contamination in proximity to the growing area or any storage areas? (This refer to a single account of human or domestic animal fecal matter and/or systematic discoveries of wild animal manure) If this question is answered Yes, automatic failure of this audit will result. 2 8.8 Are there operational hand washing facilities provided? If No, go to 8.9 8.8a Are the hand washing facilities placed within ¼ mile or minutes walking distance of all employees? page 24 of 27 Ranch V7.4 Rev. 1

8.8b Are hand wash stations clearly visible (e.g. situated outside the toilet facility) and easily accessible to workers? 8.8c Are hand wash stations properly stocked with soap, paper towels and trash can? 8.8d Are the hand wash stations designed and being maintained to prevent contamination onto the growing area ( i.e. spent water does not go straight to the ground)? 8.8e Does the growing operation have a documented and implemented policy and procedure in place requiring employees to wash their hands (e.g. prior to beginning work, after breaks, after toilet use)? 8.9 Is fresh potable drinking water provided for workers? If No, go to 8. 8.9a If used, are water containers maintained in a clean condition? 8. Are first-aid kits available and is the inventory maintained properly? 8.11 Are there trash cans available on the farm placed in suitable locations? page 2 of 27 Ranch V7.4 Rev. 1

8.12 Are there any foreign material issues observed that are or could be potential risks to the product in the growing area (e.g jewelry)? Food Security Max. point value Verified 9.1 Are measures taken to control vehicle access to the growing area? (specified access roads, furrows, etc)? 9.2 Are postings such as "No Trespassing" and/or " Restricted Entry" used appropriately? 9.3 Are entrances to ranch-level roads restricted by gates, chains, guard stations, etc.? 9.4 Are wells or other water sources secured and designed to prohibit tampering? 9. Are grounds and facilities monitored by either in house or contracted personnel? 9.6 Are staff members instructed to note and report suspicious activity? page 26 of 27 Ranch V7.4 Rev. 1

9.7 Are high risk areas (e.g. spray equipment, equipment shops, sheds) monitored? 9.8 Is equipment examined for tampering prior to use? 9.9 Are company supervisors required to undergo documented security training with attendance records? 9. Is education material related to security made available? 9.11 Are inventory records of agricultural chemicals maintained? If No, go to 9.12 9.11a Are the inventory records periodically reconciled with inventory? 9.12 Are all personal materials kept away from the harvest and packaging of the harvesting operation? page 27 of 27 Ranch V7.4 Rev. 1