LSUHSC-SCHOOL OF MEDICINE PERFORMANCE PLANNING AND REVIEW FORM

Similar documents
ACP EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL 2017

APPRAISAL INSTRUCTIONS

State Employees PERFORMANCE PLANNING AND REVIEW (PPR) Form INSTRUCTIONS SHEET

UNIT 11 Performance Evaluation Graduate Assistants, Instructional Student Assistants, Teaching Associates

PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL AND DEVELOPMENT PLAN

UNIT 11 Performance Evaluation Graduate Assistants, Instructional Student Assistants, Teaching Associates

UNCLASSIFIED EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL POLICY AND PROCEDURE

Employee Probationary Performance Review

CITY OF CORAL GABLES EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE EVALUATION PROFESSIONAL/OFFICE/TECHNICAL - CG101

Guide to Defining Performance Levels

STAFF PERFORMANCE RATING GUIDE

Knowledge frequently exceeds what is required to perform well.

OFFICE OF HUMAN RESOURCES ADMINISTRATIVE & SUPPORT STAFF PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL

Performance Review Reference Guide #2: Example Feedback Comments

NON - EXEMPT EMPLOYEE

Southern University System Annual Employee Evaluation Form for Executive Level Staff/Directors/Department Heads

Institute for Advanced Study Annual Staff Performance Evaluation

PERFORMANCE EVALUATIONS TOOLKIT REVIEW

Employee Performance Evaluation HR-500

NON - EXEMPT EMPLOYEE SELF APPRAISAL

Annual By Request Probationary First Probationary Second Probationary Third

ADMINISTRATIVE PERFORMANCE EVALUATION

PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL

THE UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA ANNUAL EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE EVALUATION Comprehensive Form

Schedule 7: Employee Performance Appraisal

Administrative and Professional Staff (Unclassified) Performance Evaluation Model D

STAFF PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL RATING SCALE AND KEY DESCRIPTORS

Performance Planning and Development Annual Review Form

PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM (PMS)

Essex County College Performance Evaluation Guide Non Instructional Personnel

Executive Self-Assessment HR-515

PERFORMANCE EVALUATION ANNUAL INTERIM INSTRUCTIONS

Job Description: Operations Manager September 2017

Classified Employee Performance Rubric

NO , Chapter 1 TALLAHASSEE, February 13, Human Resources

CATHOLIC DIOCESE OF ROCKFORD EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL

EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE EVALUATION

Performance Management and Evaluation for Administrators and Technical Professionals

Three Rivers Community Schools Support Staff Performance Assessment

Performance Appraisal System

Employee Performance Log

Student Employee Performance Evaluation

Student Employee Performance Evaluation

Stephen F. Austin State University Nacogdoches, Texas. Performance Management Plan and Review

Performance Planning and Appraisal Document

Tennessee State University Annual Employee Performance Evaluation

FIELD PLACEMENT SUPERVISOR REVIEW FORM

Staff PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT FORM

Staff PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT FORM

Staff PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT FORM

Informal observations may occur anytime, formal observations will be scheduled in advance.

Staff PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT FORM

FINAL INTERNSHIP EVALUATION

The Civil Service Performance Planning & Review System (PPR)

STAFF ANNUAL PERFORMANCE EVALUATION

ORGANIZATIONAL ACCOUNTABILITIES. Sample Phrases for Appraiser Coach-ability Receptive to feedback Willingness to learn

Performance Appraisal Factor Ratings

Classified Performance Management System Core Competencies:

Commendable Satisfactory Needs Improvement

New Employee Evaluation Form

Tennessee State University Employee Performance Evaluation

EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE REVIEW GUIDELINES

Staff Performance Evaluation

HORSEHEADS CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICT EVALUATION OF THE SUPERINTENDENT OF SCHOOLS. July 1, 2011 TO June 30, 2012

Full-Time & Part-Time Staff Six Month Performance Evaluation

ANNUAL APPRAISAL FORM

Washoe County School District. Professional Growth Systems WCSD. Education Support Personnel (ESP) Performance Standards

Exempt Performance Reviews. Date: Approved June 23, 2008 Page: 1

Subject Matter Professional Performance Appraisal FY17. Demographics. General Instructions. Rating Scale. Department:

Performance Appraisal Review for Non-Exempt Employees. Instructions

ADMINISTRATIVE STAFF PERFORMANCE EVALUATION

1. PERFORMANCE FACTORS

Guide to Developing and Implementing a Successful Internship Program

OUTSTANDING Rating 5

Nonfaculty Performance Evaluation (blank form for draft work)

DIXIE STATE UNIVERSITY 2017 Staff Employee Annual Review

PERFORMANCE EVALUATION FORM

ADMINISTRATIVE STAFF PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL FORM FY

Performance Evaluations Toolkit A Reference Guide to Assist in Facilitating the Performance Review Process

LEADERSHIP PERFORMANCE CRITERIA

Demographics. General Instructions. Rating Scale. Department:

Leadership Performance Appraisal FY17. Demographics. General Instructions. Rating Scale. Department:

WINTHROP UNIVERSITY EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM POLICY AND PROCEDURE

Personal Data Employee Name: Samantha Sample Rating Supervisor: Queso Grande. Rating Definitions Effective/Meets Expectations (ME)

STAFF PERFORMANCE EVALUATION. 02/28/2018 Type of Evaluation

NC STATE UNIVERSITY. Dr. William E. Winner Coordinator, Env. Sci. Program Jordan Hall 2231 Phone:

LOCAL 152 EMPLOYEE EVALUATION

Attendance Attendance refers to the consistency that an employee shows in turning up for work and completing their normal work hours.

Performance Skills Leader. Individual Feedback Report

Suggested Attributes to Determine Performance Evaluation Ratings

PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL FOR MIDDLE MANAGEMENT

Employee Performance Review

ARIZONA FAMILY FLORIST PERFORMANCE EVALUATION FORM

EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE PLAN AND RESULTS REPORT

LOUISIANA COMMUNITY AND TECHNICAL COLLEGE SYSTEM PROFESSIONAL/ADMINISTRATIVE EVALUATION AND PLANNING FORM FOR UNCLASSIFIED EMPLOYEES

TALENT REVIEW INSTRUCTIONS

BILOXI HOUSING AUTHORITY. Position Description. Status: Non-Exempt Pay Grade/Range:

Ministry/Department/Unit... Name: Last Name First Name Middle Initial. Date of Birth: / / Sex: Male Female D / M / Y Social Security Number:

FIRE OFFICER I. STUDENT Task Book. Agency: TASK BOOK ASSIGNED TO: INDIVIDUAL S PRINTED NAME & TITLE

Supervisor s Guide: Performance Evaluations

Transcription:

LSUHSC-SCHOOL OF MEDICINE PERFORMANCE PLANNING AND REVIEW FORM Employee Name: Employee ID #: Job Title: Does this employee supervise others? Yes No Anniversary Date: _ Rating Period: _ to PERFORMANCE PLANNING SESSION SIGNATURES TO COMPLETE THE PLANNING SESSION, BOTH THE MANAGER AND EMPLOYEE MUST SIGN HERE AFTER DISCUSSING ALL CHARACTERISTICS UPON WHICH THE EMPLOYEE WILL BE RATED. My manager has discussed with me the characteristics upon which I will be rated and the performance expectations for the upcoming rating period. Employee s Signature Date I have discussed with this employee the characteristics upon which he/she will be rated and the performance expectations for him/her during the upcoming rating period. Rating Manager s Signature Date PERFORMANCE LEVELS The following performance levels are to be used for the evaluation: DISTINGUISHED () Truly outstanding performance that results in extraordinary and exceptional accomplishments with significant contributions to objectives of the department, division, group or company. COMMENDABLE () Consistently generates results above those expected of the position. Contributes in a superior manner to innovations both technical and functional. FULLY SATISFACTORY () Good performance with incumbent fulfilling all position requirements and may on occasion generate results above those expected of the position. NEEDS IMPROVEMENT () Performance leaves room for improvement. This performance level may be the result of new or inexperienced incumbent on the job or an incumbent not responding favorably to instruction. MARGINAL () Lowest performance level which is clearly less than acceptable, and which is obviously well below minimum position requirements. Situation requires immediate review and action. Possible separation or reassignment is in order without significant and immediate performance.

REQUIRED JOB PERFORMANCE CHARACTERISTICS (Refer to Definitions of Ratings on page ).QUALITY OF WORK Accuracy, work free of errors and mistakes, overall quality of work in general. Performance Expectation: Employee uses experience and training to achieve results; produces work that is thorough; pays attention to detail; work is accurate and neat; demonstrates understanding of how his/her work contributes to overall success; completes full amount of work on time. Highest quality possible, final job virtually perfect. Quality above average with very few errors and mistakes. Quality very satisfactory, usually produces error free work. Room for improvement, frequent errors, work requires checking and re-doing. Excessive errors and mistakes, very poor quality. 2. DEPENDABILITY/RELIABILITY/AVAILABILITY Can be counted on. Performance Expectation: Employee can be counted on to take care of work-related commitments; gives extra effort when needed; can be counted on to do what is expected even when not being watched; reports on time, as scheduled; makes sure duties are covered when absent. The degree to which the employee is reliable, persistent, and available. Highly persistent, always gets the job done on time. Very reliable, above average, usually persists in spite of difficulties. Usually gets the job done on time, works well under pressure. Sometimes unreliable and will miss deadlines, avoids responsibility, satisfied to do the bare minimum. Usually unreliable, does not accept responsibility, gives up easily. 3. ADAPTABILITY AND FLEXIBILITY Adjusting to change. Performance Expectation: Employee accepts and applies constructive criticism; changes routines to meet new needs, changing conditions, or unexpected problems; looks for ways to learn new job skills. Extremely adaptive and flexible, changes routines without comment or complaint. Makes changes and adjustments easily. Initial resistance but eventually changes and adapts. Resistant to change, does not adapt easily to changing conditions or unexpected problems unless strongly urged by management. Completely resistant to change and very rigid in regards to work and routines. 4. COMMUNICATION SKILLS Giving and receiving information. Performance Expectation: Employee listens carefully and asks questions when needed; shows that he/she understands important concepts and documents; communicates clearly when speaking or writing; delivers accurate messages in a timely fashion; makes excellent oral presentations; uses appropriate communication tools for the situation; calls meetings as needed. Excellent communicator, speaks and writes clearly, concisely and accurately, listens carefully and asks relevant questions when needed. Very good written, oral and listening communication skills. Good communication skills, speaks and writes in a professional manner, listens carefully. Below average, does not always speak and write in professional manner, has difficulty communicating needs, listening skills need improvement. Poor skills in all areas of communication. 2

5. DECISION MAKING/ PROBLEM-SOLVING SKILLS Thinking on the job. Performance Expectation: Employee uses good judgment about what should be done and when it should be done basing decisions on fact rather than emotion; solves problems independently but seeks help from the right source when that is appropriate; looks for better ways of doing things if appropriate; considers ideas from various sources and chooses the one best solution. Uses exceptionally good judgment when analyzing facts and solving problems. Above average judgment, thinking is very mature and sound. Handles most situations very well and makes sound decisions under normal circumstances. Uses questionable judgment at times, often fails to make decisions within the appropriate time frame, makes decisions without needed analysis. Uses poor judgment, usually fails to make decisions within appropriate time frame and without needed analysis. 6. PROJECT PLANNING, IMPLEMENTATION AND WORK OUTPUT Creating and successfully following through with projects (such as special goals, activities, or large assignments) Performance Expectation: Employee anticipates long-range challenges and opportunities; sets specific goals and priorities; designs realistic work methods and timetables for achieving project goals; keeps track of progress toward goals; completes full amount of work on time; adapts to project changes as needed. Exceptionally good at setting goals and priorities, always does more than expected, completes projects on time, adapts easily to changes. Good at setting goals and priorities, produces more work than most, completes projects on time, adapts easily to changes. Average at setting goals and priorities, sometimes needs assistance, occasionally does more than required, usually completes projects on time, adapts to changes without problems. Has a tendency to procrastinate, plan poorly, low volume producer, completes projects late and or over budget, does not adapt well to project changes. Extremely low out-put, fails to complete projects, needs help in time management, setting goals, priorities, and adapting to changes in projects. 7. INITIATIVE AND CREATIVITY Plan, suggest ideas and work independently. Performance Expectations: Employee possesses the ability to plan work projects on their own and to go ahead with a task without being told every detail; will make constructive suggestions and think outside the box when and where appropriate. Displays unusual drive and perseverance, anticipates needed actions, frequently suggests better ways of doing things. A self starter, proceeds on own with little or no direction, progressive, makes some suggestions for improvement. Very good performance, shows initiative in completing tasks. Does not proceed on own, waits for direction, below average worker. Lacks initiative, drive and perseverance, poor performer. 3

8. COOPERATIVENESS Working effectively with and providing courteous service to coworkers and clients Performance Expectation: Employee shows courtesy to all; listens carefully to coworkers/clients to understand their individual needs; participates openly in investigations when needed, follows instructions without unreasonable complaining or arguing; gets appropriate help for a coworker/client both within and outside of his or her own work area; follows up to be sure coworker/client needs are met. Always displays courtesy and respect, stimulates teamwork and positive attitude, identifies correctly and understands coworkers/client s needs, goes out of their way to satisfy coworker/client needs, always follows up. Courteous when dealing with coworker/client, does their best to identify and meet coworker/client needs, follows up. Usually courteous when dealing with coworker/client, normally will satisfy needs and conduct follow up. Must be prodded or contacted more than once before helping to satisfy coworker/client needs, doesn t always follow up. Negative and hard to get a long with, provides inaccurate information, does not follow up. Job Performance Characteristic # Is Mandatory for Managers. MANAGEMENT AND LEADERSHIP SKILLS Directing the activity of subordinates. Performance Expectation: Manager plans and assigns work effectively and fairly; sets realistic but challenging work goals; gives subordinates the resources, guidance, and training opportunities needed to perform at their best; measures work in progress; achieves results through the high quality and quantity of work group s efforts; leads a work group that contributes to the achievement of organizational goals; recommends corrective action and/or discipline when appropriate. Exceptionally good at analyzing work, setting goals, developing plans of action, utilizing time, distributing work fairly and providing necessary support, motivation and resources, handles discipline action appropriately. Above average at planning and organizing work, setting goals and utilizing time, distributing work and providing support, motivation and resources, and handling discipline problems. Average at planning, organizing work, occasionally requires help, does not always utilize time wisely, motivate and provide resources and handle discipline problems. Needs to improve planning, goal setting skills, as well as time utilization, distribution of work, providing motivation, resources and handling of discipline problems. Unacceptable management and leadership skills, leads a work group that gets a lot of complaints. 4

Use the space below to provide additional comments regarding any of the performance characteristics, #s -.. Positive areas of present performance: Areas requiring improvement: 5

What has the employee done to improve performance from the previous review?: Developmental Plans/Goals: Overall Performance Rating (cumulative): Divided by # of Job Characteristics: Circle one category below: 2-3 4-5-6 7-8 Marginal Needs Improvement Fully Satisfactory Commendable Distinguished EMPLOYEE COMMENTS: Signatures acknowledge this form was discussed and reviewed: Employee Date: Manager/Supervisor Date: Department Head Date: 6