Transportation Cost Estimation

Similar documents
Alternatives Analysis, New Starts

An Overview of Transportation Issues in the NY Metro Area July 26, 2010

Summary of Impacts on Transit Ridership, The Transit Industry, Related Industries, and Energy Consumption

Background. Purpose of This Phase of Project Development

Introduction to Transportation Systems

2040 Transportation Policy Plan Conversion to Performance Based Planning Basis. 25 th Annual CTS Transportation Research Conference May 21, 2014

Travel Demand Forecasting User Guide

On Time Performance. PRESENTATION TO THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS Sept 24, Presented by Kenneth Mc Donald - COO Sonali Bose - CFO

Business Advisory Committee. June 17, 2015

Gateway Corridor Transitway

Orange County Transit

Midtown Corridor Alternatives Analysis. Technical Advisory Committee Meeting November 15, 2012

A Win/Win Strategy: Fixing Transportation and Reducing Greenhouse Gas Emissions in Massachusetts

Regional Performance Measures Annual Progress Report TPO Board - 2/4/2016 Presentation by: Chris Wichman, Senior Planner

Presented to : I 710 Project Committee June 30, 2011

Southern Maryland Transit Corridor Preservation Study Charles County Board of County Commissioners September 22, 2009

Caltrain Fare Study Update

STATE OF MINNESOTA Office of the State Auditor

Strategic Plan Progress Report Goal 2 Focus. November 2015 San Francisco, California

Chicago Transit Authority Orange Line Alternatives Analysis Study

RESOLUTION NO

Perspectives on Wake County s Transportation Plan Samuel R. Staley, Ph.D. DeVoe L. Moore Center Florida State University

Regional Transit Asset Management Performance Targets. Transportation Operators Committee May 24, 2017

MASTER PLAN. Urban Rail Development. Plan. Bus Transformation Plan. Taxi Transformation. Plan. Interchange and Integration Plan.

APPENDIX N East King County Subarea High Capacity Transit (HCT) Analysis: Approach to Assessing System-Level Alternatives

METROPOLITAN TRANSIT AUTHORITY OF HARRIS COUNTY, TEXAS. Independent Accountants Report on Applying Agreed-Upon Procedures

What is the Transportation Policy Plan (TPP)?

Moving Washington Toward Sustainability: WSDOT Planning Actions in Response to HB 2815 and EO 09 05

Increasing Ridership and Efficient Passenger Transit

METRA UP-W LINE. Locally Preferred Alternative Report

Calculating Mode Shift and Congestion Relief-Related Greenhouse Gas Displacement For the Current Year (see last slide for contact information)

Findings to Date UBC LINE RAPID TRANSIT ALTERNATIVES ANALYSIS 1. UBC Line Rapid Transit Alternatives Analysis Findings to Date

Rail & Transit Alternatives Analysis. NH Capitol Corridor. Public Scoping Meeting. March 5, 2014

METROPOLITAN TRANSIT AUTHORITY OF HARRIS COUNTY, TEXAS. Independent Accountants Report on Applying Agreed-Upon Procedures

SR 710 Environmental Study

Locally Preferred Alternative. Work In Progress; Subject To Change Without Notice 1

Benefit Cost Analysis Narrative

Independent Accountants Report on Applying Agreed-Upon Procedures

Cost / Benefit Analysis Table 1: Input variables used in Cost / Benefit Analysis Parameters Units Values General External Costs -Vehicles

Overview of Alternatives Analysis

SOUTHWEST LRT (METRO GREEN LINE EXTENSION)

OMNITRANS. Established in 1976 Serving the San Bernardino Valley. 16 Million Passengers Per Year Three Facilities Fleet. 15 Cities 480 Square Miles

2030 Transportation Policy Plan SUMMARY PRESENTATION. Land Use Advisory Committee November 15, 2012

Transit Carrying Capacity MPO Transit Study

NEW MEXICO LAND OF ENCHANTMENT

Service Development. Committee of the Whole April 3, 2019 Adam Harrington, Director of Service Development 1

Transportation Economics and Decision Making. L e c t u r e - 4

Progress Report Regional Express & Bus Rapid Transit Program

State Strategies to Reduce Traffic Congestion. National Conference of State Legislatures November, 2007

11. Operating and Maintenance Costs

Multimodal Approach to Planning & Implementation of Transit Signal Priority within Montgomery County Maryland

CHAPTER 2. VISION, GOALS AND MTP FRAMEWORK

Overview of City of Dallas and DART Interlocal Agreements

Final Environmental Impact Statement and Section 4(f) Evaluation

MEMORANDUM. To: Andrew Brennan, MBTA April 29, 2005

GO RAIL NIAGARA SERVICE EXTENSION

12 Evaluation of Alternatives

Updating Sound Transit s Long-Range Plan. ITE November 12, 2013

Using the Federal Transit Administration (FTA) Simplified Trips-on-Project Software (STOPS) for Transit Demand Estimation

Chapter 1: Overview. page 1. Figure 2-1: Road congestion is expected to continue to grow

Sound Transit Long-Range Plan Update/SEIS Agency Scoping Meeting. November 8, 2013

AIR QUALITY AND CLIMATE CHANGE EVALUATION GUIDANCE

Highest Priority Performance Measures for the TPP

Alternatives Identification and Evaluation

TASK 11.0 FINAL CAPITAL COST ESTIMATION METHODOLOGY REPORT

Energy Savings by replacing old facility o Energy savings o Emissions

Downtown Las Vegas Multi-modal Transportation Project Las Vegas, Nevada. Appendix A: Benefit-Cost Analysis

Ex-Ante Evaluation (for Japanese ODA Loan)

C-11: Madison Street BRT

Summary of transportation-related goals and objectives from existing regional plans

MONITORING IMPLEMENTATION AND PERFORMANCE

Introduction. Performance Measurement. Pg. 01

Economic Viability of Mississippi Gulf Coast Rail Service. NCITEC Project Dr. Waheed Uddin Seth Cobb

Regional Transit System Plan

Overview of Changes Made to CMAQ & System Performance Measures. Presented by: Jason Pavluchuk Association for Commuter Transportation

Appendix D: Functional Classification Criteria and Characteristics, and MnDOT Access Guidance

VRE Gainesville-Haymarket Alternatives Analysis Report

MARC Brunswick/Frederick Line Improvement Proposal

Proposed Comprehensive Update to the State of Rhode Island s Congestion Management Process

Transit Investment Direction and Plan Introduction. Transportation Advisory Board TPP Workshop August 16, 2017

10. PROJECT DEVELOPMENT, LEADERSHIP, AND OVERSIGHT GUIDELINES

Traffic Data Quality Analysis. James Sturrock, PE, PTOE, FHWA Resource Center Operations Team

APPENDIX B - GLOSSARY FEBRUARY 2017

Riverview Corridor Pre-Project Development Study

Vanasse Hangen Brustlin, Inc. DRAFT. Appendices. MIS Appendices

APPENDIX TRAVEL DEMAND MODELING OVERVIEW MAJOR FEATURES OF THE MODEL

National Concrete Conference. Structural Change, Impacts and Opportunities For Concrete Pavement

Performance Measures for Transportation Planning Part 1

TRANSIT SYSTEM SUMMARY REPORT

Dumbarton Transportation Corridor Study

TRANSPORTATION FACTS. OUR CUSTOMERS: Travel Patterns

Chapter 14 Public Services and Utilities

SECTION 4. Citizen s Guide to DEIS

Darrell Wilson AVP Government Relations The Future of Freight Panel August 26 th, 2014

Contents i Contents Page 1 A New Transportation Plan Community Involvement Goals and Objectives... 11

Appendix D Functional Classification Criteria and Characteristics, and MnDOT Access Guidance

Section 4.8 Climate Change

HAMILTON B LINE LRT EVALUATION OF PHASING SCENARIOS TECHNICAL REPORT

The Policies section will also provide guidance and short range policies in order to accomplish the goals and objectives.

Transportation Cost Analysis:

Transcription:

Transportation Decision-making Principles of Project Evaluation and Programming Transportation Cost Estimation Kumares C. Sinha and Samuel Labi 1

Transportation Costs Classification of Costs Agency Costs User Costs/Community Costs Cost Functions Highway Transit Air Issues in Cost Estimation 2

Classification By Incurring Party Agency User Nonuser or Community Costs 3

Cost categories 4

Cost Categories Details of Agency Costs 5

Cost Categories Details of User Costs 6

Cost Categories Details of Community Costs 7

Cost Variation with Output Volume TC (V) = k + f(v) k = Fixed Cost f (V) = Variable Cost V = Output Ratio of Variable Cost to Fixed Cost - Is an Indicator of Economy of Scale 8

By the Expression of Unit Cost Average Total Cost, ATC = TC V Average Fixed Cost = FC V Average Variable Cost = VC V Marginal Cost Vs. Average Cost Ratio of Small Increment of Cost to a Small Increment of Output MC = δ C δ V 9

MC and AC can differ significantly $10 million to build a 10-mile highway $10.5 million for 11-mile AC s are $1 million and $0.954 million MC of additional 0.5 mile $0.5 million MVC = MTC = δvc δv δ TC δ FC δvc δvc = + = = MVC δv δv δv δv 10

Table E4.1 11

Example: Historical record of operating costs for a metropolitan bus system Total Average and Marginal Costs Significance of the interaction between AC and MC 12

Illustration- Variation of Different Cost Types 13

Illustration- Variation of Different Cost Types 14

Illustration- Variation of Different Cost Types 15

Solution: When MC < AC, scale economies Revenue is maximum at the ridership level when MC = AC (@3.7 million) 16

TC ($M) = 1.2 + 150V 2, V = monthly output in million of tons AC =1.2/V + 150 V MC = 300 V Optimal Output = 0.09 million tons 17

Illustration 18

Cost classification by By Position in Facility Life Cycle Initial or Construction Costs Subsequent Costs e.g. Maintenance, Operation and Preservation Costs Life Cycle Costs 19

Other Classifications of Costs In-House vs. Contract Preventive vs. Corrective Routine vs. Periodic 20

Transportation Agency Costs For Facilities For Rolling Stocks Advance Planning Acquisition Preliminary Engineering Operation Final Design Preservation R-O-W Acquisition and Preparation Maintenance Construction Salvage or disposal Operations Preservation and Maintenance Salvage or Disposal 21

Techniques for Estimating Agency Costs A. Disaggregate Approach By Pay Items $ per length, area, or volume or weight of finished product, reported separately for materials, labor and supervision, and equipment use. At planning stages, level of identifying pay items and their costing is quite coarse. Cost models as a function of facility attributes. 22

B. Aggregate Approach 1. An average rate per unit output for various subcategories. 2. A statistical model. Example: Unit cost per lane-mile-station in $M = 3.9 x L 0.702 x U 1.08 x ST -0.36 L = number of line-miles U = fraction underground ST = number of stations 23

Risk as an Element of Agency Cost Is due to Uncertainties in Estimation possible outcomes probability of each outcome consequences of decisions expected value Monte Carlo sampling defined probability distribution 24

Due to Disasters Natural or Man-made Vulnerability Cost = (Pr obability of Disaster Cost of Damage) 25

User Costs Travel Time Safety Vehicle Operating Noise, Air and Water Pollution 26

Demand and User Cost Interaction User Benefits Demand Supply Before Improvement Unit Cost Supply After Improvement Quantity Demand is Inelastic 27

Figure 4.3 Elastic, Induced Trips 28

Figure 4.4 Elastic Demand - Generated Trips 29

Figure 4.5 W X K Y Z 30

Additional Consumer Surplus May Not be Equal to Change in User Cost Change in (UC) > Change in (CS) Change(UC) = (Y + Z) (X + Y) = Z - X Change(CS) = (K+X) - W 31

Figure 4.6 32

Table: Possible Variables for Agency Cost Functions or Rate 33

Highway Cost Models Cont. Cost = F (Labor, Materials, Equipment Costs, Contract Characteristics, Environment) Variables Number of Crossings R-O-W Environmental Impacts Soil and Site Conditions Project Size Project Complexity Construction Delivery Method Urban/Rural Location Historical Cost Database by Pay Items 34

Transit Cost Models High Speed Rail Heavy Rail Commuter Rail Light Rail Monorail BRT Urban Bus Transit 35

Unit Cost of Heavy (Rapid) Rail Construction UC = 3.906 * LM -0.702 * PU 1.076 * ST -0.358 R 2 = 0.94 Where UC = Cost Per Line-Mile-Station in $ M(2005) LM = number of Line-Miles PU = Percentage of System Underground ST = Number of Stations 36

Example 1: Heavy Rail Given 12 Line-Miles 4 Stations 85% Above Ground Total Cost = (12)(4)[3.906(12-0.702 )(15 1.076 )(4-0.358 ] = $367.68 M 37

Table 4.5 Light Rail Construction Cost per Mile 38

Guideways for Light Rail Guideway construction accounts for 16-38% of overall capital costs of LRT Guideway Cost = exp(-1997.92 + 1448.22*Length 0.0005 + 553.55Stations 0.0005 ) R 2 = 0.61 39

Example 2: Light Rail Two Alternatives Alternative 1: 21 Miles, 13 Stations Alternative 2: 38 Miles, 22 Stations Total Guideway Cost Alternative 1: exp(-1997.92 + 1448.22*21 0.0005 + 553.55*13 0.0005 ) = $868.35 M Alternative 2: exp(-1997.92 + 1448.22*38 0.0005 + 553.55*22 0.0005 ) = $1544.71 M Average Cost Alternative 1: $868.35 M / (21)(13) = $3.18 M / mile-station Alternative 2: $1544.71 M / (38)(22) = $1.84 M / mile-station 40

Stations and Yards for LRT a. Passenger Station Costs per Station b. Maintenance Yards and Shops per Unit of Capacity c. Capacity = Max. Number of Vehicles that can be held in Maintenance Yard. 41

Example: Subway LRT Given: 20 Passenger Stations; 60 Vehicle Capacity Average Cost of Passenger Station for Subway LRT = $26,982,000 Cost of Stations = 20 x 26,982,000 = $539,640,000 Average Cost of Maintenance Yard = $600,000 per unit capacity Cost of 60 Capacity Yard = 60 x 600,000 = 36,000,000 Total Capital Cost for Stations and Yards = $575,640,000 42

Rolling Stock Capital Costs for Rail Transit Avg. Cost/Car ($ Millions) Heavy Rail 2.3 LRT 2.6 Commuter Rail 2.4 43

Rolling Stock Rehabilitation Avg. Cost/Car ($ Millions) Heavy Rail 0.84 Commuter Rail 0.99 44

BRT Capital Costs Depend on Location, Type, and Complexity of Construction Independent at-grade 7.5 million/mile Arterial Busways on Median $6.6 Mixed Traffic and/or Curb Bus lanes 1.0 Many Times Higher When Tunnels and Other Features for Exclusive Guideways are involved See Table 4.11 45

Rail Transit Operating Costs As a Function of Supply-Based Measures Op. cost per mile, per vehicle, per expected VMT As a Function of Demand-Based Measures Op. cost per passenger, per passenger-hour or passenger-mile Personnel cost is 70 80% Heavy Rail has the Lowest Op. Cost per Passenger-mile See Tables 4.12 and 4.13 46

Example: A LRT with 20 cars @ 330 miles/day From Table 4.12, Avg. Op. Cost/Revenue Vehicle-Mile = $11.02 Expected Revenue Vehicle-Miles / Year = (330)(365)(20) Estimated Total Op. Cost / Year = (2,409,000) (11.02) = $26,547,000 47

Bus Transit Capital Costs Acquisition and Rehabilitation of Buses Construction and Preservation of Terminals, Stations and Maintenance Facilities Bus Acquisition Costs Table 4.14 Bus Rehabilitation Costs Table 4.15 Facilities - $120-140/sq. ft. 48

Bus Transit Operating Costs Cost per Vehicle-Mile = 2.625S 0.184 PBR 0.029 S = Number of Buses in Maximum Service. PBR = Peak Buses/Off-peak Buses Unit Op. Cost by System Size and PBR Table 4.16 Average Capital and Operating Costs by City Size Tables 4.17 4.19 49

How to Update Costs? Use of Price Indices FHWA Federal-Aid Highway Price Index FHWA Highway Maintenance and Operating Cost Index FTA Cost Adjustment Factors FHWA State Cost Factors (Table 4.20) 50

Cost Adjustments for Economies of Scale The Greater the Project Size, the Lower is the Unit Cost (e.g. Cost per Lane-Mile) Adjustment for Economics of Scale on the Basis of Unit Aggregate Cost of a Project and Unit Aggregate Cost Function for all Projects of Same Type Unit Cost Function can be Developed from Historical Contract Data 51

Example: Two Alternative Types, A & B 40-Mile Transit System C A = -1.05 ln(x) + 5.2 ca = $207,000 / mile C B = 30/x 0.95 cb = $285,000 / mile where, x = number of line-miles 52

Figure E4.11 p. 92 53

From Cost Function, Unit Cost to be Used Instead of Given Average Cost Values. System A = $133,000/mile System B = $90,000/mile 54

Problem of Cost Overruns 5-14% Underestimation at Planning Stage Design Revisions Unexpected Site Conditions Construction Errors Weak Estimates of Inflation Include a Realistic Contingency Amount 55