Calculating Food Miles for a Multiple Ingredient Food Product

Similar documents
Checking the Food Odometer: Comparing Food Miles for Local versus Conventional Produce Sales to Iowa Institutions

Checking the food odometer: Comparing food miles for local versus conventional produce sales to Iowa institutions

Energy Efficiency as an Integral Part of Sustainable Agriculture: Food Miles and Fuel Usage in Food Transport

The Evolution of Food Miles and its Limitations as an Indicator of Energy Use and Climate Impact

Energy Efficiency, Food Miles and Fuel Usage in Food Transport

Agriculture A Top Export Prospect for Colombia

The Science of Maryland Agriculture

Carbon Footprint Analysis for Kaiser Permanente Food Procurement Alternatives in Northern California

Food, Fuel, and Freeways: An Iowa perspective on how far food travels, fuel usage, and greenhouse gas emissions

School Food Revolution? The state of the school llunch tray and efforts to improve kids health

The WIC Food Package: Prices and Store Formats

Demand for Niche Local Brands in the Fluid Milk Sector

Consumer Preferences

MEMO CODE: SP , CACFP , SFSP Procurement Geographic Preference Q&As Part II

1. Identify money saving hints for grocery shopping 2. Determine one strategy to try within the next month to improve their grocery shopping skills

Comprehension Explain five ways I can save money when eating out. Explain five ways I can save money at the grocery store.

Food Miles: Background and Marketing

Processing and Selling Value Added Food Products in Maryland

Apples, Bananas, and Oranges: Using GIS to Determine Distance Travelled, Energy Use, and Emissions from Imported Fruit

Major Alternate Marketing Channels in the U.S. Food System 1

Texas Pecan Growers Conference and Trade Show San Marcos, Texas July 15-18

Sugar and Sweeteners Outlook

Three factor to consider Market, Market & Market. Some of our agricultural produce is actually utilized on the farm from where they were produced

NORTHEAST IOWA LOCAL FOOD SURVEY SUMMARY REPORT July 2007

NORTHEAST IOWA LOCAL FOOD SURVEY SUMMARY REPORT July 2007

Activity 39. Mapping Agricultural Products. Where is your milk produced? Your eggs? Your cereal? Your woolen blanket or sock?

REPORT 16 DECEMBER, Airbnb Listings and Hotels in Communities of Color

Processing and Selling Value Added Food Products in Maryland

The Food System and Climate Change

ORGANIC CERTIFICATION & INTEGRITY. Karen Klonsky Dept. of Agricultural & Resource Economics University of California, Davis

Nebraska PROFIT OPPORTUNITIES FOR FOOD MANUFACTURING

Crossroads Resource Center

Food & Beverage Manufacturing in Central California

farmers market Food Vendors

Big Mac versus Small Mac Exploring the Benefits of a Cheeseburger Made from Locally Sourced Ingredients

NYS Department of Agriculture and Markets Division of Food Safety and Inspection Field Operations Manual

Südzucker Group 4 th Wertpapierforum. Nikolai Baltruschat (Head of Investor Relations) Tauberbischofsheim, March 21, 2012

The Local Food Movement: Definitions, Benefits, and Resources

Romania. Organic Market Overview - Romania

Financing Farm to Fork: Growing the Sustainable and Local Food Movement

Economic Impact of Agriculture and Agribusiness in Miami-Dade County, Florida

Kansas. Estimated Economic Impact of Agriculture, Food, and Food Processing Sectors 08/01/2017

AMBER WAVES VOLUME 6 ISSUE 1

Assumptions and methodologies for life cycle assessment of food products

READY, SET, GO! - CAN YOUR REGION STILL COMPETE?

farmers market Organizers

Vendor Application Category 1: Category 2: Category 3: Category 4:

LOGAN COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC HEALTH FOOD PERMITTING GUIDELINES FOR FARMERS MARKETS, OUTDOOR AND TEMPORARY FOOD EVENTS

June Dairy Month Open Houses: Improving Consumer Understanding of Modern Animal Agriculture

Name: Address: Town: State: Zip Code: Name of 4-H Club. Club Leader:

Economic Impact of Florida's Fruit and Vegetable Industries 1

Savour. Network. Grow 7-9. The International Trade Exhibition for Agriculture, Food, Food Processing & Packaging

Stephan Goetz *,** Department of Agricultural Economics, Sociology and Education Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802

Guide to Finding Local Foods. Robert Kluson, Ph.D. Agriculture/Natural Resources Extension Agent UF/IFAS Sarasota County Extension

Time Allotment: minutes. Grade Level or Target Audience: Grades 7-10

Institutions Participating in the Child and Adult Care Food Program Sponsors Participating in the Summer Food Service Program

FARM TO HOSPITAL SUPPORTING LOCAL AGRICULTURE AND IMPROVING HEALTH CARE. Community Food Security Coalition

Crossroads Resource Center

The growing local and sustainable food movements have spurred new opportunities for family farmers, food processors, and rural and urban businesses.

Identifying an efficient feed distribution system in the Midwest

Farmers Market Guidance February 7, 2017

Processing, What We Already Do Here and Where Michigan Production Sells

AIC Insights. Ten Local Food Opportunities

To Certify or Not to Certify: How marketplace relationships affect the adoption of organic certification by fruit and vegetable farmers

North Georgia Local Food & Local Farms. Helping to grow North Georgia s local food economy

Local Foods are BIG in Indiana Small Farms

Food Miles Buy Local, Pollute Less

Agricultural Outlook Forum 2004 Presented Friday, February 20, 2004

Economic Impacts from Increasing Pig Farrowing in Iowa

Regional Values for Milk Are Changing

St. Louis Food Hub and Mobile Market

Agriculture and Food Processing in Washington State Economic Impacts and Importance of Water

Comparing Apples to Apples: An Iowa Perspective on Apples and Local Food Systems

The Staying Power of Local Food Demand Views from the National Landscape. Debra Tropp, Deputy Director Marketing Services Division

Stonyfield's enterprise product carbon footprint journey

The Food Manufacturing Industry in the Midwest

MAFS Algebra 1. Equations and Inequalities in the Real-World. Day 6 - Student Packet

Investigate How Food is Produced, Distributed, Exchanged, and Consumed

Estimating the Production and Market Value Based Impacts of Nutritional Goals in NE Iowa * Dave Swenson. Economics, Iowa State University

Chapter 3. Cooperatives Bruce L. Anderson, Professor Brian M. Henehan, Senior Extension Associate

Washington State Snap-Ed Curriculum Fidelity for Continuous Improvement. Lesson Assessment for Plan, Shop, Cook & Save; Lesson 3: Saving Money

WTF - NaturBusiness to go with AgriBusiness?

SAMPLE. Report Code: PK1152MR

Florida Farm to School Programs

Sustainable Agriculture 101: Lake County Local Food System Primer. May 17, 2012 Jason Navota, CMAP

Farmer s Market Legislation & Food Safety Regulations

Contribution of Agribusiness to the Magic Valley Economy, 2013

Presentation Overview Regional Food Hubs

CUYAHOGA COUNTY ASSESSMENT: ACCESS TO SUPERMARKETS

FOOD FOR THOUGHT FIRST POTLUCK OF THE YEAR

Michael Boland L10, L16, L66, Q13 Keywords: Agribusiness, Food Economy, Industry Analysis, Five Forces, Food Processing

Agriculture --- In Touch With You Daily!

April Ensuring Safe Food from Production to Consumption

ORGANIC CONSUMERS, MARKETS AND OPPORTUNITIES IN CANADA

Miles to Go before We Eat: Food Miles & the New York City Foodshed.

THE UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS LIBRARY G30V

Augustana College. Dining Service Sustainability

The Amazing Race. How does agriculture make regions unique? Teacher Fast Facts & Vocabulary Support.

Global RESPONSIBILITY 2018 SUMMARY

Investigate How Food is Produced, Distributed, Exchanged, and Consumed

Transcription:

Leopold Center Pubs and Papers Leopold Center for Sustainable Agriculture 3-2005 Calculating Food Miles for a Multiple Ingredient Food Product Richard S. Pirog Iowa State University, rspirog@iastate.edu Andrew Benjamin Iowa State University Follow this and additional works at: http://lib.dr.iastate.edu/leopold_pubspapers Part of the Bioresource and Agricultural Engineering Commons, Food Processing Commons, and the Operations and Supply Chain Management Commons Recommended Citation Pirog, Richard S. and Benjamin, Andrew, "Calculating Food Miles for a Multiple Ingredient Food Product" (2005). Leopold Center Pubs and Papers. 147. http://lib.dr.iastate.edu/leopold_pubspapers/147 This Report is brought to you for free and open access by the Leopold Center for Sustainable Agriculture at Iowa State University Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Leopold Center Pubs and Papers by an authorized administrator of Iowa State University Digital Repository. For more information, please contact digirep@iastate.edu.

Calculating Food Miles for a Multiple Ingredient Food Product Abstract This report details the assumptions and calculations used to estimate the food miles for a container of strawberry yogurt. Keywords Food miles food pathways food system assessments Disciplines Bioresource and Agricultural Engineering Food Processing Operations and Supply Chain Management This report is available at Iowa State University Digital Repository: http://lib.dr.iastate.edu/leopold_pubspapers/147

Calculating food miles for a multiple ingredient food product by: Rich Pirog, Marketing and Food Systems Program Leader, Leopold Center Andrew Benjamin, student, Iowa State University Agricultural & Biosystems Engineering Leopold Center for Sustainable Agriculture 209 Curtiss Hall Iowa State University Ames, Iowa 50011-1050 Web site: www.leopold.iastate.edu March 2005 For more information contact: Rich Pirog, Marketing and Food Systems Program Leader Phone (515) 294-1854 e-mail: rspirog@iastate.edu

1

Table of Contents page Executive Summary...3 Background...5 Assumptions...6 Calculations...8 Conclusions...12 Figures Figure 1. Figure 2. Northeast Iowa county-level dairy production data...9 Ingredient sources for strawberry yogurt...12 Acknowledgements The authors wish to thank the following people for their contributions to this paper: Mary Adams Leopold Center, for reviewing and editing the manuscript Zachary Paskiet Leopold Center, for assistance with figures Laura Miller Leopold Center, for web publishing Andrew Hug Leopold Center, for reviewing the manuscript 2

Calculating food miles for a multiple ingredient food product Executive Summary A food mile is the distance food travels from where it is grown or raised to where it is ultimately purchased by the consumer or end user. To determine the average number of food miles a certain food item travels from all sources to reach a certain city or community, it is necessary to calculate a Weighted Average Source Distance (WASD). The WASD from production source to consumption endpoint is a single distance figure that combines information on distances from producers to consumers and the amount of food product transported. Food miles have become a metaphor to contrast local and global food systems for food systems researchers and local food practitioners alike. Most food miles calculations have been for single ingredient products such as fresh fruit and vegetables. There are, however, few examples of calculated food miles for multiple ingredient food products such as ice cream, pizza, canned vegetable soup, and fruit pie. Since most U.S. consumers buy an array of multiple ingredient food products from both conventional and natural food stores, it is important to explore how food miles can be calculated for such products. This report details the assumptions and calculations used to estimate the food miles for a container of strawberry yogurt, a multiple ingredient food product containing milk, sugar, and strawberries. Using a set of assumptions and information learned about ingredient sources, we calculated the weighted total source distance (WTSD) for the primary ingredients that make strawberry yogurt (processed in Des Moines, Iowa and shipped to nearby food retailers in Des Moines) to be 2,216 miles. The weighted average source distance the average distance ingredients travel (based on percent weight in final product) was 277 miles. The final WTSD of 2,216 miles provides a glimpse at how far-ranging our sourcing of ingredients for multiple ingredient food products can be. It should be noted that the WTSD for strawberry yogurt does not represent the average distance that these ingredients travel to make yogurt that is found in brands and stores across the United States. WTSD values are specific to the source locations and assumptions used to make the calculations. The WTSD for strawberry yogurt likely will be lower in some states and higher in others when compared to our Iowa calculations. In order for food systems researchers and local food practitioners to use food miles more effectively as a metaphor to contrast local and national/global food systems, food mile values need to be calculated for multiple ingredient food products. This paper provides the details for one such calculation. The values cited here are based on a set of assumptions and are, at best, approximations. Even so, the authors encourage local food practitioners to be as precise as possible in calculating food miles for multiple ingredient food products. The following guidelines are suggested when calculating food miles for multiple ingredient products: Check with one or more of the food processors making the product as to the primary sources of the ingredients. It may be necessary because of a lack of adequate information to omit from your calculations minor ingredients that make up less than 1 percent of the product by weight. 3

Be prepared to investigate and document the sources where other processing steps occurred after the product left the farm. This was the case for sugar (which came from sugar beets) in our example. Another common example is corn syrup used in baked goods or breakfast cereal. Clearly the corn will come from farms, but corn is processed into corn syrup at a location other than the farm and then shipped to the bakery or cerealmaking plant. Use weighted averages when a primary ingredient comes from multiple sources. It may be simpler to pick one source for an ingredient, but if the ingredient clearly comes from several sources (as indicated on the label or by the food processor), it will be more accurate to include a weighted distance that considers all primary sources. For truck-based transport, use road routes rather than as the crow flies distances to make your calculations. Express your results as how far all the ingredients traveled (WTSD), and how far on average did the ingredients travel (WASD). 4

Background A food mile is the distance food travels from where it is grown or raised to where it is ultimately purchased by the consumer or end user. It is relatively easy to calculate food miles for a single ingredient, unprocessed food product from the time it leaves the farm until it is purchased. Using fresh produce as an example, lettuce grown in California San Joaquin Valley and transported to supermarkets in Des Moines, Iowa will travel approximately 1,400 miles. Chilean grapes transported by ship from Chile to California and then by truck to Des Moines, Iowa markets travel 7,270 miles 1. To obtain the average food miles a certain food item travels from all sources to reach a certain city or community, it is necessary to calculate a Weighted Average Source Distance (WASD). 2 The WASD from production source to consumption endpoint is a single distance figure that combines information on distances from producers to consumers and the amount of food product transported. The formula for the WASD is: Σ ( m( k) * d( k)) WASD = Σm( k) where: k = different locations of the production origin, m = amount consumed from each location of consumption origin, and d = distances from the locations of production origin to the point of consumption. U.S. Department of Agriculture Agricultural Marketing Service produce arrival data from the Chicago, Illinois terminal market were examined by the Leopold Center for 1981, 1989, and 1998, and a WASD food mile was calculated for arrivals by truck within the continental United States for each year. Produce arriving by truck traveled an average distance of 1,518 miles to reach Chicago in 1998, a 22 percent increase over the 1,245 miles traveled in 1981. 3 A WASD food mile was calculated for a sampling of produce sales data collected in 2001 by the Practical Farmers of Iowa (a non-profit information and research organization). Iowa farmers sold produce to hotels and conference centers that were featuring locally-grown meals for a number of conferences and workshop events. Another WASD was calculated based on an estimate of where the produce items (which were purchased locally in the Practical Farmers of Iowa data set) would have originated had they come from conventional sources within the continental United States. The average food mile (WASD) for the Iowa locally grown produce 1 Pirog, Rich and Patrick Schuh, 2002. The load less traveled: Examining the potential of using food miles in ecolabels. Proceedings from Ecolabels and the Greening of the Food Market Conference, November 2002. p. 69. 2 Carlsson-Kanyama, Annika. 1997. Weighted average source points and distances for consumption origin-tools for environmental impact analysis. Ecological Economics 23(1997) 15-23. 3 Pirog, R., T. Van Pelt, K. Enshayan, and E. Cook. 2001. Food, Fuel, and Freeways: An Iowa perspective on how far food travels, fuel usage, and greenhouse gas emissions. Leopold Center for Sustainable Agriculture, Ames, Iowa. 5

to reach institutional markets was 56 miles, while the conventional food mile total for the produce to reach the same points of sale was 1,494, nearly 27 times further. 4 There are a number of examples in other states and countries where food miles have been calculated for single ingredient food products. Applications have been developed to use food miles to inform consumers about the positive environmental benefits of reducing fuel use and greenhouse gas emissions by reducing transport distance. 5 The Life Cycles Project in Vancouver, Canada allows subscribers to calculate food miles and greenhouse gas (CO 2 ) emissions for selected food products. 6 In New York, the Farmscape Ecology program helped to develop an in-store computer program to provide customers with a report summarizing the food mile benefits from their local food purchases. 7 Food miles have become a metaphor to contrast local and global food systems for food systems researchers and local food practitioners alike. There are, however, few examples of calculated food miles for multiple ingredient food products such as ice cream, pizza, canned vegetable soup, and fruit pie. Since most U.S. consumers buy an array of multiple ingredient food products from both conventional and natural food stores, it is important to explore how food miles can be calculated for such products. The remainder of this report details the assumptions and calculations used to estimate the food miles for a container of strawberry yogurt, a multiple ingredient food product containing milk, sugar, and strawberries. Assumptions As is often the case with multiple ingredient food products, the exact weight and production origin for each ingredient is not available on the product label. One cannot assume that ingredients will be sourced close to where the processing plant is located even though plant location can often be ascertained from the product label. Components for a multiple ingredient food product often are sourced nationally and globally based on ingredient and transport cost. In order to make the necessary food mile calculations for strawberry yogurt, a set of assumptions need to be made: The yogurt is sold in eight ounce containers at retail food establishments. The primary ingredients needed to make this yogurt include milk (assume 1 percent milk fat), sugar, and strawberries. Active yogurt cultures are added at the dairy processing plant. 8 4 Pirog, R. and A. Benjamin. 2003. Checking the food odometer: Comparing food miles for local versus conventional produce sales to Iowa institutions. Leopold Center for Sustainable Agriculture, Ames, Iowa. 5 Pirog, R., T. Van Pelt, K. Enshayan, and E. Cook. 2001. Food, Fuel, and Freeways: An Iowa perspective on how far food travels, fuel usage, and greenhouse gas emissions. Leopold Center for Sustainable Agriculture, Ames, Iowa. 6 Life Cycle Project web site visited February 2005: www.lifecyclesproject.ca. 7 Conrad Vispo, 2005. The Green Checkout Report found in Food Miles: A Farmscape Ecology Program Consumer Education Project. (www.hawthornevalleyfarm.org/fep/foodmiles.htm) 8 Conversation with Iowa-based dairy product manufacturer, December, 2004. Exact proportion of ingredients is proprietary information. 6

The sugar and strawberries each will represent 3.5 percent of the total weight of the final yogurt product. 9 The milk represents 93 percent by weight of the final yogurt product. 10 The weight of other ingredients (such as active cultures, natural and artificial flavors) will be less than 1 percent of the product, and will not be factored into the food miles calculations. 11 Only the food ingredients will be used to calculate food miles; the origins of the plastic yogurt cup and lid, foil cover, and cardboard case (24 yogurt cups per case) will not be considered. The dairy processing facility for this yogurt product will be in Des Moines, Iowa, and the product will be shipped to nearby Des Moines food retail establishments. Sugar in the yogurt is processed from sugar beets that are grown in the Red River Valley of Minnesota and North Dakota. Milk used in the yogurt is produced primarily on farms in northeast Iowa. Strawberries contained in the yogurt come from farms in California and Florida. When using USDA Agriculture Statistics Service (NASS) county level data to make estimates of centralized location for product origin, the product is assumed to be equally distributed in each county that is being considered. Locations Locations for each ingredient are an assumed centralized location that is characteristic of the typical region from which the ingredients are procured. 12 The county level census data from http://www.nass.usda.gov/census/census02/volume1/index2.htm is used to determine a centralized location of origin. Northeast Iowa is the typical source for milk for these yogurt products. The centralized location was based on a percentage of the total dollars ($) of revenue per county in that region in comparison with the other counties. Sugar is processed from sugar beets grown primarily in the Red River Valley of Minnesota and North Dakota. The centralized location was based on a percentage of the total dollars ($) of revenue per county in that region compared with other counties in Minnesota and North Dakota. For sugar beets, the locations for processing plants also were considered in calculating food miles. This information came from: 9 Ibid. 10 Ibid. 11 Ibid. 12 Pirog, R. and A. Benjamin. 2003. Checking the food odometer: Comparing food miles for local versus conventional produce sales to Iowa institutions. Leopold Center for Sustainable Agriculture, Ames, Iowa. 7

http://www.crystalsugar.com/coopprofile/532.pdf Based on the locations of the processing plants relative to the sugar beet farms, it was determined that the added distance from the farm to the processing plant has a minimal impact on the distance from farm to the dairy processing plant. To determine a weighted average distance for the processing plants, we examined annual processing output (annual sugar) from web site data 13 to determine the weighted average location to make our distance calculations (similar to WASD to Des Moines). The path of travel is the same for farm to Des Moines as it is for farm to sugar beet processing plant to dairy processing plant in Des Moines. The comparison of weights for processed and unprocessed sugar products also was considered. This took into account the fact that the sugar in sugar beets is a percentage of the total weight. Unprocessed sugar beets require more shipping containers than the volume of sugar processed from the sugar beets. The website used to help calculate this ratio is: http://www.smbsc.com/aboutsmbsc/sugarbeet.htm Strawberries are usually sourced from California and Florida. We used a weighted average between California and Florida based on data retrieved from St. Louis and Chicago regional produce markets. 14 Weighted Total Source Distance The Weighted Total Source Distance (WTSD) was calculated for the entire processed product. This calculation reflects the total miles the ingredients travel. The shipping distances were calculated using MapQuest (www.mapquest.com). The WTSD calculation is as follows: WTSD = Σ (W * D * T * R) Ingredient Where: W = Weight of each ingredient (per container), D = Shipping distance between ingredient origin and destination, T = Percent of total amount shipped from each origin per ingredient, and R = Ratio of shipping weight to processed weight. Calculations In this section, we detail the seven steps that lead to our results for strawberry yogurt. Step 1 Determine the weight (W) of each product ingredient. Assuming 93 percent of the product s weight is milk and the total weight of the product is 8 ounces, then: W Milk = (0.93) * (8 ounces/container) W Milk = 7.44 oz milk/container 13 The web sites used are: http://www.mdf.coop/agriculture/agriculture.htm and http://www.crystalsugar.com, and http://www.sbreb.org/brochures/sugarcoop/ 14 Pirog, R. and A. Benjamin. 2003. Checking the food odometer: Comparing food miles for local versus conventional produce sales to Iowa institutions. Leopold Center for Sustainable Agriculture, Ames, Iowa. 8

If 3.5 percent of the product s weight is sugar and the total weight of the product is 8 ounces, then: W Sugar = (0.035) * (8 ounces/container) W Sugar = 0.28 ounce sugar/container If 3.5 percent of the product s weight is strawberries and the total weight of the product is 8 ounces, then: W Strawberries = (0.035) * (8 ounces/container) W Strawberries = 0.28 ounce strawberries/container Step 2 Determine the source location of each ingredient in order to find the distance (D) to the processing plant. Since the three yogurt ingredients (sugar, milk, and strawberries) are transported by truck, we used Mapquest (www.mapquest.com) to provide road distances for our calculations. For milk, the primary source is northeast Iowa. We used USDA National Agriculture Statistics Service (NASS) county level data for percent of total dollars of milk sold (Figure 1) to determine a centralized location for milk production. Elkader, Iowa was the chosen centralized location. 1.7% 2.5% 10.8% 6.9% ELKADER 2.1% 6.1% 9.9% 0.6% 1.3% 7.7% 10.7% Figure 1. Northeast Iowa county-level dairy production sales D Milk = 205 miles Florida and California have been shown to be two primary sources of strawberries to the upper Midwest based on previous Leopold Center research. 15 We used the source distances from these two states to Des Moines, Iowa. D Strawberries (CA) = 1,811 miles D Strawberries (FL) = 1,394 miles For sugar beets, both a centralized location of production and a centralized processing location needed to be determined. The main area of sugar beet production was the Red River Valley area 15 Ibid. 9

in Minnesota and North Dakota. The path of travel for sugar beets was assumed to start at the farm where they were produced. Then, the sugar beets are shipped to the processing plant, where they will be processed into sugar and shipped to the dairy processing plant where the sugar is used to make yogurt. The same method used to determine the center of origin for milk production was used for sugar beet production. Crookston, Minnesota was the centralized location. D Sugar beet = 35 miles (Distance from farm to sugar processing plant) To determine the distance from the sugar beet processing plants to the dairy processing plant location, a weighted average source distance (WASD) was calculated. This was completed using the WASD equation: Σ ( m( k) * d( k)) WASD = Σm( k) Where: k = different locations of the processing plants, m = annual processed sugar output from each location, and d = distances from the locations of the sugar plants to the location of the yogurt plant. WASD = 524 D Sugar = 524 miles Step 3 Determine the percent of total amount shipped (T) from each ingredient s point of origin. Single centralized locations were determined for milk, sugar beets, and sugar such that: T Milk, T Sugar, T Sugar beet = 100 percent For strawberries, we followed previous Leopold Center research 16 and used USDA Agricultural Marketing Service produce arrival data to determine the relative percentages of California and Florida strawberries coming into the upper Midwest market. We found that 81.8 percent of the strawberries come from California while the remaining 18.2 percent come from Florida. T = Σ (Weight to regional markets) Origin / Σ (Total regional markets) T California = [(102 tons) St Louis + (243) Chicago ] / (102 + 243 + 17 + 60) = 81.8 percent T Florida = [(17 tons) St Louis + (60) Chicago ] / (102 + 243 + 17 + 60) = 18.2 percent T Strawberries = T California + T Florida = 81.8% + 18.2% = 100 percent 16 Ibid. 10

Step 4 Determine the ratio of weight of amount transported to processed weight (R). For milk and strawberries this ratio is not calculated because it is assumed that the entire volume of the milk and strawberries leaves the farm and arrives at the dairy processing plant. It also assumes that all processing for these ingredients is done at the dairy plant. We need to use this ratio for the sugar beets to account for the difference in raw sugar beets being shipped to a sugar processing plant versus refined sugar being shipped to the dairy processing plant. If sugar beets contain 17.3 percent sugar 17, then the weight of the transported amount of raw sugar beets required to produce that sugar is: R Sugar = 100 percent sugar beet / 17.3 percent sugar R Sugar = 5.78 pounds sugar beet / one pound sugar Step 5 Calculate the Weighted Total Source Distance for the processed food product. WTSD Dairy plant = Σ (W * D * T * R) Ingredient WTSD = (W * D * T * R) Milk + (W * D * T * R) Sugar + (W * D * T * R) Strawberries WTSD = (7.44 oz / container ) (205 mi) (100%) (1) (Milk) + (0.28 oz / container ) (35 mi) (100%) (5.78) (Crude sugar beet) + (0.28 oz / container ) (524 mi) (100%) (1) (Refined sugar) + (0.28 oz / container ) (1811 mi) (81.8%) (1) (California strawberries) + (0.28 oz / container ) (1394 mi) (18.2%) (1) (Florida strawberries) WTSD Dairy plant = 2,211 miles traveled ounce per container Step 6 Add the average distance from the dairy plant to the retail food store to the WTSD. One way to calculate this distance is to pick a specific retail food store and using Mapquest (www.mapquest.com) determine the distance from the processing plant to the store. An alternative way to calculate the dairy plant to store distance is to use an average distance to Des Moines-area food retail stores. The average distance the yogurt travels from the processing plant to Des Moines-area food retail stores (based on information from the predominant grocery chain in Des Moines) can be determined in the following manner: D Store = (Distances) / (# of Stores) D Store = 5.48 miles We can add this distance directly to the WTSD: 17 The sugar beet root is 77.6 percent water, 17.3 percent sugar, 4.4 percent fiber, and 0.7 percent ash. Information found at http://www.smbsc.com/aboutsmbsc/sugarbeet.htm 11

WTSD Store = (2211 + 5) miles or 2,216 miles ounce per container All of these calculations assume the consumer resides in Des Moines. The source distances for our example are shown on the map in Figure 2. Figure 2. Step 7 Calculate the WASD to determine how far on average the ingredients traveled To calculate the distance each ounce of ingredient travels on average (WASD), the total source distance is divided by the number of ounces in a container. This is the weighted average distance the ingredients travel to the processing plant. Since the majority of the product is comprised of milk (93 percent), the WASD will more closely reflect the distance milk travels compared to the other ingredients. WASD Dairy plant = 2211 miles traveled - oz/ 8 oz = 276.4 miles traveled per ingredient WASD Store = 2216 miles traveled oz / 8 oz = 277 miles traveled Conclusions The weighted total source distance for the ingredients used to make strawberry yogurt and the weighted average distance ingredients in the yogurt travel can be calculated using simple mathematical formulas. Assumptions were made to use only those ingredients that made up 1 12

percent of more of the total weight of the product, and to use the primary sources for each ingredient considered. The source distances of the yogurt container, lid, seal and shipping box were not considered in the calculations. Both the weighted total source distance and the weighted average source distance should be calculated to give the reader and user of the information a more accurate picture of how far all the ingredients traveled (WTSD), and how far on average did the ingredients travel (WASD). The final WTSD of 2,216 miles provides a glimpse at how far-ranging our sourcing of ingredients for multiple ingredient food products can be. It should be noted that the WTSD for strawberry yogurt does not represent the average distance that these ingredients travel to make yogurt that is found under various brands in stores across the United States. WTSD values are specific to the source locations and assumptions used to make the calculations. Compared to our Iowa calculations the WTSD in strawberry yogurt likely will be lower or higher in other states. The typical consumer s retail food purchases include a significant number of multiple ingredient food products, from frozen dinners and pizzas to prepared and ready-to-eat soups, cakes, pies, and cookies. In order for food systems researchers and local food practitioners to use food miles more effectively as a metaphor to contrast local and national/global food systems, food mile values need to be calculated for multiple ingredient food products. This paper provides the details for one such calculation. The values cited here are based on a set of assumptions and are, at best, approximations. Even so, the authors encourage local food practitioners to be as precise as possible in calculating food miles for multiple ingredient food products. The following guidelines are suggested when calculating food miles for multiple ingredient products: Check with one or more of the food processors making the product as to the primary sources of the ingredients. It may be necessary because of a lack of adequate information to omit from your calculations minor ingredients that make up less than 1 percent of the product by weight. Be prepared to investigate and document the sources where other processing steps occurred after the product left the farm. This was the case for sugar (which came from sugar beets) in our example. Another common example is corn syrup used in baked goods or breakfast cereal. Clearly the corn will come from farms, but corn is processed into corn syrup at a location other than the farm and then shipped to the bakery or cerealmaking plant. Use weighted averages when a primary ingredient comes from multiple sources. It may be simpler to pick one source for an ingredient, but if the ingredient clearly comes from several sources (as indicated on the label or by the food processor), it will be more accurate to include a weighted distance that considers all primary sources. For truck-based transport, use road routes rather than as the crow flies distances to make your calculations. Express your results as how far all the ingredients traveled (WTSD), and how far on average did the ingredients travel (WASD). 13