Hello my name is Joy Loughry and I am with the groundwater technical unit of the Minnesota department of natural resources. Today I am going to talk

Similar documents
Minnesota Department of Natural Resources DNR

Groundwater Management Challenges. Jason Moeckel Minnesota DNR Division of Ecological and Water Resources

The DNR is charged with managing waters resources to assure an adequate and sustainable supply for multiple uses.

MGWA Spring Conference April 19, 2012

One Watershed, One Plan

Shaina Keseley MPCA-Rochester Watershed Project Manager

Regulation of Groundwater

Cannon River One Watershed, One Plan. POLICY COMMITTEE MEETING January 10, 2018 Rice County Government Center Faribault, MN

Water Governance Evaluation

Water Supply Work Plan for Clean Water Fund Activities

Bureau of Drinking Water & Groundwater Wisconsin DNR

BWSR PROGRAMS THAT ADDRESS NUTRIENT LOSS

Environmental Information Worksheet

Deborah Swackhamer University of Minnesota

SPEAKER ABSTRACTS/BIOGRAPHIES

Sustainable Use of Groundwater in the Little Rock Creek Area. A DNR Action Plan

Legislative Water Commission Legislative Recommendations: Desired Future State Minnesota s Water Resources August 2018

Isanti Soil and Water Conservation District Strategic Framing

TOTAL: 5,250 acres over next 20 years 3

British Columbia s. VVater Act. Modernization. Policy Proposal on British Columbia s new Water Sustainability Act. December 2010

RAMSEY CONSERVATION DISTRICT COMPREHENSIVE PLAN

Environment and Natural Resources Trust Fund 2010 Request for Proposals (RFP)

Environment and Natural Resources Trust Fund Request for Proposals (RFP) New Generation in Water Supply Management-Pilot Studies

Where Funds are Spent

Water Rights And Summer Stream Conditions

Surface Water. Solutions for a better world

Policy Resolution Water Quality in the West A. BACKGROUND

awetlands aprairie aforests ahabitat for Fish, Game & Wildlife

Appendix C MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES DIVISION OF WATERS MINNESOTA RULES RELATED TO WATER APPROPRIATION PERMITS

WATERSHED MANAGEMENT IN MINNESOTA. GOVERNANCE, PLANNING, AND FUNDING June 19, 2018 Cedar Rapids, Iowa

Unify efforts to address water resources for the Big Sky area and surrounding zone of influence in three co-equal water resources focus areas:

Icicle Creek Water Resource Management Strategy

(Must be a county, city, township, watershed district, watershed management organization or joint powers organization.)

Clean Water Fund Performance Report. A report of Clean Water Funds invested, actions taken and outcomes achieved

Environment and Natural Resources Trust Fund 2018 Request for Proposals (RFP)

APPENDIX 5: SAMPLE MODEL RESULTS

Minnesota EAW Supplement

One Watershed, One Plan Operating Procedures

How to Fill Out TABLE 10 in Your 2016 Water Supply Plan Potential Water Supply Issues & Natural Resource Impacts

Chapter 4 Watershed Goals and Objectives

Projects and Practices Application

Phase 1 - Technical Assessment Kettle River Watershed Management Plan. Request for Proposals

CHAPTER 4 WATERSHED PLAN GOALS & OBJECTIVES

Planning for Future Water Supply Needs. Brandon Kernen NH Department of Environmental Services

groundwater/surface-water interactions Evan Christianson, PG Barr Engineering Company

Dakota County Soil and Water Conservation District. Strategic Plan

Water for All, Now and Into the Future: Water Quantity in Wisconsin. A report by the Sierra Club-John Muir Chapter

CONSERVATION RESERVE ENHANCEMENT PROGRAM (CREP) SUMMARY OF THE WISCONSIN S PROJECT

Report to the Minnesota State Legislature: Additional Tools to Implement Groundwater Sustainability Requirements

Conversion of Pine Lands to Row Crop Agriculture; Who Would Have Guessed?

STRATEGIC PLAN FY 2018 FY 2019

Flow-Through Lake/Wetland: Generalized Monitoring Strategy

The Basics: What Communities Need to Know

Shell Rock River Watershed: Water Plans

How Much Habitat Is Enough? How Much Disturbance is Too Much?

NATURAL RESOURCES Vision Statement

WHAT IT TAKES TO PROTECT 10,000 LAKES

Lesser Slave Watershed Council. Executive Summary Community Engagement for the Integrated Watershed Management Plan, October December 2016

Public Lands In-Depth Version 1.1, 3/29/2018

Water Rights 101: An Overview of California Water Law with an Emphasis on Instream Flow Projects

TITLE 9. ENVIRONMENT STATE WATER CONTROL BOARD

C. Staffing Needs Approximately 150 staff days TSA #3 staff time will also be utilized.

KEY AND COMMON QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS PROPOSED GROUNDWATER DIRECTIVE FSM Overview of the Directive s Purpose

WASA Quiz Review. Chapter 2

Santa Clara Valley Water District 2017 Water Supply Master Plan Planning Objectives

Setting the Course for Improved Water Quality Collecting Land Use Data for TMDLs

DRAFT Budget and Outcomes Committee FY18-19 Clean Water Fund recommendations (July 8, 2016)

Nutrient Management Strategy for the International Red River Watershed. Collaborating Across Jurisdictions to Improve Water Quality

The Regulatory Framework

Scientific Inadequacies of Evaluating Direct, Indirect and Cumulative Impacts from Phosphate Mining in the Peace River Watershed

Bluff Creek One Water

Lower Howard Creek W atershed Watershed Number:

Capacity Building Through the Watershed Approach

NACWA Perspectives on Water Quality Trading and the National Network s Options and Considerations Guide

Jordan River Basin. Planning for the Future. Salt Lake County Watershed Symposium (August 11, 2011) Todd Stonely Utah Division of Water Resources

CONSERVATION DISTRICTS PROGRAM FRAMEWORK FOR THE FUTURE

the snapshot version

Use of Minnesota s Renewable Water Resources: Moving Toward Sustainability

How is Water Quality Affected by Land Use?

The five regional level maps of natural and cultural resources are included below:

State and Regional Water Supply Planning in Illinois

WATER SUPPLY NOW AND FOR THE FUTURE Steps toward sustainable water supplies

3. Engage stakeholders as active participants in developing effective, long-term water resource management objectives and strategies.

3D WETLAND MANAGEMENT

Calcareous Fen: Generalized Monitoring Strategy

Statewide Water Management Plan Association County Commissioners of Georgia May 2, 2008

Walnut Creek Watershed Environmental Quality Assessment Report May 2007 Bridging the Gap Between Environmental Quality and Community Development

Facilitating Public Education on Ethanol Production and Water Resources

Groundwater Management and Planning in Washington County, MN

Green River Basin Plan Executive Summary

Conservation Ontario s Response to Climate Ready: Ontario s Adaptation Strategy and Action Plan June 2011

our Water A Watershed and Aquifer Planning Model for Saskatchewan

Overview of Tiered Aquatic Life Uses (TALU)

9.0 PROJECT FUNDING 9.2 FUNDING OF WATER DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS

Surface Water Impacts from Groundwater Withdrawals. Presented by: Al Pratt Steve Howe

GOALS, ACTION ITEMS, ONGOING TASKS FOR Introduction

CLEAN WATER PLAN Policies, Assessments and Management Programs

A Brief Summary of the Water Bill, SB 552 1

A resource assessment of the Etowah Watershed

TABLE OF CONTENTS: VOLUME 1

Transcription:

Hello my name is Joy Loughry and I am with the groundwater technical unit of the Minnesota department of natural resources. Today I am going to talk about how the state of Minnesota manages its Water resources and how we are moving forward with groundwater management areas. 1

The state of Minnesota has 5 state agencies that regulate our water resources. The Minnesota board of water and soil resources, The Minnesota Department of Agriculture, the Minnesota department of Health and the Minnesota pollution control agency deal mostly with water quality issues like local planning, regulation of pesticides and fertilizer, well head protection, and industrial contamination. The Minnesota Departmentof Natural Resources regulates water supply and availability. 2

Minnesota is a riparian rights state. Minnesota s Water Law is based on the common law doctrine of riparian rights modified by the concept of reasonable use. If you own land abutting a surface water source or overlying a ground water source you have the reasonable right to use the resource subject to the rights of other riparian landowners This allows property owners to take water for domestic, agricultural, and industrial purposes from both surface and groundwater sources. Water appropriation permits are required by the DNR for any appropriation that exceeds 10,000 gpd or 1 mgy. Permit holders must annually report their use to the agency and pay a water use fee based on volume. DNR has the authority to establish limits on volumes of water that are appropriated. Applications must show that the use will be sustainable now and into the future and that the proposed use will not harm ecosystems, degrade water quality, or reduce the water level below nearby public and private domestic wells. When there are water conflicts Minnesota Law sets general priorities ranking types of water use. 3

Historically we have operated with the assumption that there is enough water for everyone here in the land of 10,000 lakes. An appropriator will ask for a volume and we will evaluate their request based on the local hydrogeology and if the well is located within a sensitive area with known water supply issues or environmentally sensitive areas like a calcareous fen or trout stream. For this highlighted irrigation well we would require a pumping test to ensure there is no impact on the nearby trout stream. We oftentimes deal with one permit application at a time and may not consider all of the other withdrawals in the area. We also manage instances of well interference. If a well owner s pump goes dry they can file a well interference complaint and we will investigate to determine if the cause is another appropriation in the area. If the complaint is valid and we find for instance that an irrigation well is dewatering a domestic well or say a mine dewatering operation is impacting a municipal supply well we will work to mediate a solution where the higher priority well is deepened or redrilled in another area. This is a reactionary approach to management. 4

There are many components to the hydrologic cycle, these components are impacted by both human activities and climactic change. We have been managing all of these components as parts, water quality, land use planning, water supply and demand. All of these uses and components of management affect the hydrologic cycle and may not individually create a known measurable impact but together they create cumulative impacts that can be very damaging to the system as a whole. 5

We have realized the need to manage the entire system holistically. We need to treat the system as one water because of surface and groundwater interactions. We have moved to management based on the watershed approach understanding that surface watershed and groundwater shed boundaries do not always match up. As we begin to manage these areas in this holistic approach, the boundaries will be better defined based on the components of the system. We need to consider all users in the system both human and ecological realizing that ecosystem functions are required for human health. We also need to balance the social, economic, and political needs and requirements. 6

The citizens of the state of Minnesota realize the importance of protecting our natural resources and thus On November 4, 2008, Minnesota voters approved the Clean Water, Land, and Legacy Amendment to the constitution to protect drinking water sources; to protect, enhance, and restore wetlands, prairies, forests, and fish, game, and wildlife habitat; to preserve arts and cultural heritage; to support parks and trails; and to protect, enhance, and restore lakes, rivers, streams, and groundwater. This amendment created a 3/8 s percent sales tax through the year 2034. Approximately one third of these funds are dedicated to the clean water fund which supports many programs aimed at protecting the waters of this state. This amendment shows how much Minnesotan's value the resources of this state and how much we value clean plentiful water. 7

The clean water fund is divided amongst 7 agencies to pay for programs to protect, enhance, and restore water quality in lakes, rivers, streams, and groundwater, with at least five percent of the fund targeted to protect drinking water sources 5 of these agencies were mentioned previously and the other two are the Metropolitan Council which is the regional planning agency throughout the twin cities metro area and the Minnesota Public Facilities Authority provides municipal financing programs and expertise to help communities build public infrastructure that preserves the environment, protects public health, and promotes economic growth. Of course The Clean Water fund is not our only source of funding for DNR programs, many of our programs are funded through the Environmental and Natural Resources Trust Fund, and partners like the USGS, local in kind spending, and also general fund. 8

The MN DNR has water sustainability programs including mapping, monitoring, and managing. Mapping includes understanding the distribution of surface and groundwater resources, in reality we still do not know a lot about our aquifers. Our County Atlas Part B program, depicts the characteristics and pollution sensitivity of Minnesota's groundwater resources. Monitoring measuring changes in water supplies over time and evaluates impacts from withdrawals. We monitor climate with weather stations, surface water through stream and lake gaging, and groundwater levels with our statewide observation well network. 9

Management includes planning and permitting to assure sustainable water resources. The tools that we have include resource protection laws such as protected flows and elevations of surface waters, safe yield for groundwater, and then special requirements for trout streams, calcareous fens, and endangered species. The DNR can place special requirements on appropriation permits requiring monitoring or can place thresholds on groundwater levels that can cause restrictions on pumping. MN Statute 103g.287 The commissioner may designate groundwater management areas and limit total annual water appropriations and uses within a designated area to ensure sustainable use of groundwater that protects ecosystems, water quality, and the ability of future generations to meet their own needs. Water appropriations and uses within a designated management area must be consistent with a plan approved by the commissioner that addresses water conservation requirements and water allocation priorities 10

The process of prioritizing areas that could be managed using a groundwater management area has been ongoing for decades through experiences that all of the agencies have had. There are areas in the state with reoccurring problems due to lack of water supply or water quality. We identified many different GIS based coverages showing priority areas for different criteria. My example is a map showing the groundwater supply areas of concern depicting areas where groundwater may be limited or easily contaminated aquifers, areas of karst land, areas of shallow depth to bedrock. Other layers included things like anticipated growth of population and industry, a coverage of the MNPCA designated impaired surface waters, biodiversity areas of significance, nitrogen probability maps and many others. A list of these areas were compiled into a matrix and were ranked based on the number of environmental, social, and economic issues. We worked with other agencies to determine their priority areas and to find areas where we could work together to manage. Of course each of these areas will have different priorities and will be set in different hydrogeologic settings around the state, so they will each have specific sets of challenges as we move forward. The most important criteria for a successful gwma will be local interest and buy in. 11

As we begin to work through the scoping process for priority gwmas we have a set of things that are essential. We must first clearly identify the issues of the area, this could be concerns of over allocation of appropriations that are impacting surface water features, or possibly contamination of the water supply from industrial or agricultural impacts. We need to engage local partners, as you can see on the map, this area does not align with political boundaries, it includes many different municipalities, three separate counties, three major watersheds, and for our own internal difficulty three separate DNR management regions. Local partners would include groups such as the local representation of the state agencies, regional planning commission, the county commissions, municipalities, Soil and Water conservation districts, local irrigators, native American tribes, rural water authorities, the public. We need to compile the existing data and conduct a data gap analysis to determine where we need additional data. We need to upgrade and improve our monitoring in the area, gw/sw/climate, enhance data collection and sharing while simplifying access for all. We may need to update existing models or create new models to help understand the system. We need to clearly determine what the local management goals are and outline what deliverable products will be handed over to the local unit of government. 12

The groundwater management area goals are to encourage and influence local water use management with agency oversight. We will comprehensively characterize the hydrogeologic system so that we have an understanding of the system to be managed. We will provide the data, technical information, up to date technical tools and BMPs to the local management agencies to help guide them to make sustainable management decisions on land use, planning, and to aid them in conflict resolution. It is also necessary that the state agencies work collaboratively within these areas to support the local agencies. All of our programs such as WHPP, TMDL, agriculture BMPs, and water appropriation must fit together for this to be successful. 13

14