Pelican Lake SAGD Pilot Approval 11469A 2011 Update. ERCB Offices March 21, 2012.

Similar documents
Pelican Lake SAGD Pilot

Seal Main HCSS Pilot Subsurface Review

Air injection & displacement for recovery with oil horizontal (AIDROH) project Approval #11618 Performance presentation

Harmon Valley South HCSS Pilot Approval Annual Performance Presentation

Seal Main HCSS Pilot Approval Annual Performance Presentation

Air injection & displacement for recovery with oil horizontal (AIDROH) project Approval #11618 Performance presentation

January 2011 to September 2012 Kirby ERCB Directive 54 Annual Performance Presentation

Annual Performance Presentation

Annual Performance Presentation

Cenovus EnCAID approval #10440J Performance presentation

VALUE I GROWTH I INNOVATION. AER 2014 Annual Presentation. Saleski Thermal Pilot AER Approval 11337

Murphy Oil Company LTD.

Pengrowth Energy Corporation Lindbergh SAGD Project 2013 Annual Performance Presentation Scheme Approval No. 6410I.

2018 Directive 054 Performance Presentation

JAPAN CANADA OIL SANDS LTD. HANGINGSTONE DEMO PROJECT 2004 Presented on Monday, March 7, 2005 Presentation Outline

HILDA LAKE SAGD PILOT PERFORMANCE SUMMARY 2004 AEUB PRESENTATION BLACKROCK VENTURES INC

Sunshine Oilsands Ltd. BA Code A2TF WEST ELLS SAGD. Scheme No E AER In Situ Performance Presentation 2017

2017 Directive 54 Performance Presentation

6 DRILLING AND COMPLETIONS

Annual Surmont SAGD Performance Review Approvals 9426, 11596, and April 6, 2016 Calgary, Alberta, Canada

Outline of Presentation

VSD is a commercially proven technology for bitumen recovery that is used worldwide and in Western Canada by other operators.

Penn West Petroleum Ltd. Seal Main HCSS Pilot and Harmon Valley South Annual ERCB Progress Presentation

History Matching Field Results from a SAGD / Light Hydrocarbon Process (SAGD+ TM )

EnCana Christina Lake In Situ Oil Sands Scheme 2007 Update

Alberta Energy Regulator Suite 1000, Street SW Calgary, Alberta T2P 0R4 Attention: Steve Thomas, P.Eng., Section Leader In-Situ Oil Sands

Groundwater Supply Development at Canadian Natural Resources Limited s In Situ Oil Sands Operations

Thermal In-Situ Scheme Progress Report for 2016 Japan Canada Oil Sands Limited Hangingstone. Approval No (Demonstration Project)

2013 PERFORMANCE PRESENTATION (SUBSURFACE) LONG LAKE MARCH 19, 2014

Progressing C-SAGD recovery of bitumen from the Grosmont D reservoir

PENGROWTH ENERGY CORPORATION LINDBERGH SAGD PROJECT 2017 ANNUAL PERFORMANCE PRESENTATION SCHEME APPROVAL 6410P

Telephone Lake project

2012 Annual Performance Presentation McKay River Thermal Project

Monitoring Plan for a Cyclic Steam Stimulation (CSS) Pilot Test in Orinoco Oil Belt, Venezuela

Orion In Situ Oil Sands 2015 Progress Update. Presented May 25, 2016

Overview of Completions

Timber Creek Field Study for Improving Waterflooding

William Wilmot Matrix Solutions Inc. 118, Avenue S.W., Calgary, Alberta, Canada

Well Abandonment Presentation West Central Stakeholders Rocky Mountain House. November 19, 2013

MAY 2016 ALLAN ALBERTSON, P.ENG., TYLER HALLMAN, P.ENG.

Annual Surmont SAGD Performance Review Approval April 4, 2018 Calgary, Alberta, Canada

SPE Abstract. Introduction

A Comparison Study between the Newly Developed Vertical Wells Steam Assisted Gravity Drainage and the Conventional SAGD Process

Proposed East Manson Unit No. 5 Application for Enhanced Oil Recovery Waterflood Project Middle Bakken East Manson, Manitoba

Well-Based Monitoring

New Acid Stimulation Treatment to Sustain Production Los Angeles Downtown Oil Field U.S. Department of Energy Grant No.

RDS Aberdeen. Thursday, May-05-11

Innovative Energy Technologies Program

Husky Oil Operations Limited Tucker Thermal Project Commercial Scheme #9835

Suncor MacKay River Project 2017 AER Performance Presentation. Reporting Period: September 1, 2016 to August 31, 2017

Recovery Process - Cold Heavy Oil

Examining Reservoir Water Retention During SAGD. Thursday January 31 st, 2013

Grizzly Oil Sands ULC

Draft Directive 051. Wellbore Injection Requirements. Contents. Revised edition August 14, Replaces previous edition issued March 1994.

Suncor MacKay River Project 2017 AER Performance Presentation. Reporting Period: September 1, 2017 to August 31, 2018

Sand Control. Gravel packing is the oldest and simplest method of sand control. Works in both on and off shore wells.

IMPERIAL COLLEGE LONDON. Department of Earth Science and Engineering. Centre for Petroleum Studies

Steam Injection. Dr. Helmy Sayyouh Petroleum Engineering Cairo University

Thermal Recovery Status and Development Prospect for Heavy Oil in China

For contact information, please visit our website:

Oil Sands Development in Canada by SAGD - Further Challenges to Improve Efficiency -

Jared Wynveen, P. Eng McDaniel & Associates Consultants Ltd. 2014

Seal 9 barrier verification by xlot and Communication test

Disposal and Injection Well Requirements

Flow Testing Results from Habanero EGS Project

Insulated Tubulars for use with Thermal Oil Recovery Processes

Measurement Schematics & Facility Delineation Requirements Required by September 11, 2014

Effects of Well Placement using Multi- Segmented Wells in a Full Field Thermal Model for SAGD: Athabasca Oil Sands

Tailings Storage and Heap Leaching in a Combined Facility A First for the Mining Industry

AN OVERVIEW OF THE LOW AND HIGH TEMPERATURE WATER-OIL RELATIVE PERMEABILITY FOR OIL SANDS FROM DIFFERENT FORMATIONS IN WESTERN CANADA

Technological Enhancement of PC Pumps for Heavy Oil Production. Courtney Ward P.Eng.

ESP experiences on the Mature Dunlin Field An integrated approach to optimise Field Performance

SECTION 7.0 WATER SOURCE MANAGEMENT TABLE OF CONTENTS

F. Kabus, G. Möllmann, F. Hoffmann and J. Bartels GTN Geothermie Neubrandenburg GmbH, Seestrasse 7A, Neubrandenburg, Germany

California Dreamin. on such a winter s day. The Mommas and the Papas

Thermal In-Situ Scheme Progress Report for 2015 Japan Canada Oil Sands Limited Hangingstone

ATHABASCA OIL CORPORATION AER LEISMER UPDATE

Module 3 Design and Construction of Water Wells. For more information refer to the Water Wells That Last video (Part I Planning and Construction).

SOUTH CASPER CREEK: Steamflood Pilot Implementation

CONDENSATION INDUCED WATER HAMMER

This presentation is based upon work supported by the Department of Energy National Energy Technology Laboratory under DE FC26 05NT42590 and was

6 th Well Bore Integrity Network Meeting

Tomakomai CCS Demonstration Project

Well abandonment procedures and perforation with a slotted charge for cement squeeze applications

Grizzly Oil Sands. Algar Lake SAGD Project 2015 In Situ Performance Presentation Scheme Approval No C May 13, 2015

Feasibility Research of Steam-Assisted-Gravity-Drainage Process in Bohai Offshore Heavy Oil Reservoirs

COPYRIGHT. Sand Control Fundamentals. Virtual Instructor Led Session #2

Dan Paul Ştefănescu*, Alexandru Nitulete** NONINVASIVE STIMULATION OPPORTUNITIES IN A MARGINAL GAS FIELD

The SPE Foundation through member donations and a contribution from Offshore Europe

Unconventional Resources

Artificial Lift Optimization & Well Cleanout Technology

Evaluation of Recovery Technology for the Grosmont Carbonate Reservoir

Trican s Burst Port System (BPS)

Multiple Zone Geothermal Stimulation Case Study: Fluid Diversion Using Thermo-Degradable Zonal Isolation Materials

Stormwater Reuse Through Aquifer Storage & Recovery

Monell Unit CO 2 Flood

PEACE RIVER IN SITU OIL SANDS PROJECT DIRECTIVE 54 ANNUAL PERFORMANCE PRESENTATION. December 13, 2017 PREMIUM VALUE. DEFINED GROWTH. INDEPENDENT.

Production Performance Optimisation

LNAPL Volume and Mobility Estimation to Assess When to Stop Active Recovery. by Louis Sabourin, P.Eng. and David Tarnocai, P.Geo.

Heavy Oil Systems Experience and expertise to enhance productivity

Transcription:

Approval 11469A 2011 Update ERCB Offices March 21, 2012.

Introduction and Overview Introduction Subsurface Issues Related to Resource Evaluation and Recovery Directive 054, Section 3.1.1 Surface Operations, Compliance, and Issues Not Related to Resource Evaluation and Recovery Directive 054, Section 3.1.2

Subsurface Issues: Table of Contents 1. Brief Background of the Scheme 2. Geology / Geoscience 3. Drilling and Completions 4. Artificial Lift 5. Instrumentation in Wells 6. Seismic 7. Scheme Performance 8. Future Plans

Brief Background Subsurface Subsection 1 Pelican Lake SAGD Pilot Approval 11469A 2011 Annual Performance Presentation

Brief Background

Project Overview SAGD Pilot to evaluate large resource base of ~ 5 Billion barrels OBIP 100% WI Other operations within the region Cenovus and Canadian Natural Resources operate enhanced recovery schemes Laricina has proposed a 155,000 bbls/d development in the Grand Rapids A to the north

Application History April 2010 June 2010 August 2010 November 2010 August 2011 November 2011 December 2011 ERCB Scheme application submitted ERCB Approval No. 11469 granted ERCB Facility License F42085 granted AENV Approval No. 269241-00-00 granted ERCB MARP approved ERCB D51 granted for 26P01/26I01 ERCB Scheme amendment for 2 nd well pair submitted ERCB Approval No. 11469A granted AENV & ERCB amendment for 3 rd OTSG, expanded surface lease and extended operating period to December 2017 Approval pending

Description of Recovery Process The Pelican Lake SAGD Pilot uses the dual-horizontal well SAGD (steam assisted gravity drainage) process to recover the bitumen from the Grand Rapids A formation Two horizontal wells one above the other ~5m apart Steam injected into the upper well to heat the bitumen and allow gravity to drain to the lower well Oil and water emulsion pumped to the surface and treated

Original Objectives Test longer well lengths (1200m+) Evaluate start up procedures Determine peak rates from the Grand Rapids Reservoir management with the lean zone

Geology / Geoscience Subsurface Subsection 2 Pelican Lake SAGD Pilot Approval 11469A 2011 Annual Performance Presentation

Predictable SAGD Play with New Challenges Shore-face Deposit Depositional environment is ideal for SAGD. Sands are laterally and vertically continuous and predictable. SAGD Well pair lengths up to 1600m in length are proposed Bitumen deposit within Regional Grand Rapids Aquifer Non saline ground water Reservoir quality issues; lean zone (top water mobility), average SAGD Pay 18 m, average SAGD oil saturation 64%, permeability ~ 2,900 md, and reservoir operating pressure ~ 1,200 kpa Wells 26P01, 26I01 100/9-10 100/5-11 102/5-11 102/13-2 103/12-2 VIKING CAP ROCK GDPD A TOP PAY LEAN ZONE SAGD PAY BASE PAY GDPD B GDPD B

Stratigraphic Correlation After Jackson, 1983 Cap Rock Bitumen & Source Water Wabiskaw Production ~23,000 bbls/day Disposal Zone NISKU

Paleogeography - Grand Rapids A mbr Pelican Lake Depositional environment - prograding shoreface (marine sediments forming shoreline sandstones) Very fine to medium grained Quartzose sand with minor feldspar, chert, muscovite and biotites Aerially extensive 10m+ thick bar sands Shoreline After Jackson, 1983

Type Log VIKING JOLI FOU GRAND RAPIDS A GRAND RAPIDS B

Grand Rapids A Top Structure Map

SAGD Base Structure Map

Grand Rapids B Top Structure Map

Cap Rock Isopach Map (Joli Fou Formation)

Grand Rapids A Lean Zone Isopach Map

Grand Rapids A SAGD Pay Isopach Map

Summary of Reservoir Properties Base of Grand Rapids A Average Gross Thickness Average SAGD Pay Thickness Average Porosity Average Water Saturation 357-363 m Subsea 23 m 18 m 35 % 46 % (Gross ) Average Permeability 2.9 D 38 % (SAGD Pay Zone) OBIP 8.0 X10 6 m 3 (50.3 MMbbls ) Oil Viscosity Oil Gravity Initial Reservoir Pressure 1,000,000 cp+ 7.5-8.5 API 1200 kpa

Grand Rapids A Mineralogic Petrographic Montage

Cap Rock Integrity - Joli Fou Fm 103/06-11-082-23 W4M (221 mkb) Fracture closure pressure=4.75 MPa

Drilling and Completions Subsurface Subsection 3 Pelican Lake SAGD Pilot Approval 11469A 2011 Annual Performance Presentation

Well Layout / Location Map 03/12-11 00/9-10 Thermocouples Piezometers 00/1-10 00/8-10 x 02/8-10 02/5-11 03/5-11 03/6-11 00/4-11 Ground Water obs 02/3-11 02/16-3 x X New Drills 02/13-2 13-2 00/9-3 x 03/12-2 100/5-11 (Swab/Inj test)

Start-up Circulation Pad26P01 Producer Completion KB Elevation: 609.95 m Ground Elevation: 604.95 m Conductor 508.0 mm 139.89 kg/m H-40 ST&C Surface Casing landed at 20.0 mkb UWI: 102/12-02-082-23W4/00 *Notes: Outer Tubing Outer tubing crossover should be ~20m back from liner hanger WR Plug Weatherford 244.5 At 112.0 mkb Surface Casing 339.7 mm 81.1 kg/m J-55 ST&C Surface Casing landed at 95.0 mkb Intermediate Casing 244.5 mm 59.53 kg/m L-80 QB2 Production casing landed at 441.0 mkb MD Outer tubing 139.7 mm J-55 R3 25.3 kg/m TKC40/40 tubing set at 402.11 mkb MD 114.3 mm J-55 R2 17.3 kg/m TKC40/40tubing c/w re-entry guide on end of tubing from 402.11 m 819.2 mkb MD Instrument string 31.7 mm coil to 1,558.0 mkb Smith Thermal Liner Hanger top at 423.02 mkb MD Bottom at 425.42 mkb MD Inner Tubing Inner tubing crossover should be ~10m above outer tubing crossover. (73.0mm 60.3mm) Inner tubing crossover from 60.3mm to 73.0mm should be right after outer tubing TD. (As soon as possible) Inner tubing should end ~15-20m back from Liner TD. Liner Slotting First Slot at 452.88 mkb Last Slot at ~1611.32 mkb TOE at 1624.66 mkb MD Inner tubing 73.0 mm R2 L-80 TKC40/40 tubing to 391.85mKB (~10 15 m above outer crossover) 60.3 mm R2 L-80 TKC40/40 tubing from 391.85 m 835.01 mkb (~5-10 m after end of outer 114.3mm tbg 73.0 mm R2 L-80 TKC40/40 tubing c/w mule shoe on end from 835.01m 1606.82 mkb MD December 2010 Liner capacity: 34.23 kg/m 0.020535 m3/m 38.69 kg/m 0.019958 m3/m Liner 177.8 mm 38.7 / 34.2 kg/m L-80 QB2 425.42 m 1625.00 mkb MD (end of guide shoe)

Start-up Circulation Pad26I01 Injector Completion Surface Casing 13 3/8 in 339.7 mm 71.43 kg/m H-40 ST&C Surface Casing landed at 120.0 mkb UWI: 100/12-02-082-23W4/00 *Notes: Outer Tubing Outer tubing crossover should be ~20m back from liner hanger Inner Tubing Inner tubing crossover should be ~10m from outer tubing crossover. (73.0mm 60.3mm) Inner tubing crossover from 60.3mm to 73.0mm should be right after outer tubing TD. (As soon as possible) Inner tubing should end ~15-20m back from Liner TD. Intermediate Casing 9 5/8 in 244.5 mm 59.53 kg/m L-80 QB2 Production casing landed at 420.0 mkb Outer tubing 5.5 in & 4.5 in 139.7 mm tubing to 400.0 mkb 114.3 mm tubing from 400mKb to 814.0 mkb Inner tubing 2 7/8 in 73.0 mm tubing to 390.0 mkb (~10-15 m before outer Crossover) 60.3 mm tubing to 820.0 mkb (~5-10 m after outer tubing bottom) 73.0 mm tubing to 1580.0 mkb December 2010 Liner Hanger 405.0 mkb Liner 177.8 mm = 7 in 38.7 / 34.2 kg/m L-80 QB2 405.0 1599.43 mkb

26P01: Completion After Circulation with Suction Ports Surface Casing 339.7 mm 71.43 kg/m H-40 ST&C Surface Casing landed at 120.0 mkb Intermediate Casing 244.5 mm 59.53 kg/m L80 QB2 Production casing set @ 420.0 mkb See next slide for discussion on challenges with this completion. Production Tubing: 4.5 in 114.3 mm tubing to 365.0 mkb ESP Landed @ 380 mkb Instrument String 31.7 mm coil landed @ end of tail pipe Include bubble tube at Pump intake 4.5 Tail Pipe with 2 ports. April 2011 Liner 177.8 mm 38.7 / 34.2 kg/m L-80 QB2 Liner Hanger 405.0 mkb 405.0 1607.09 mkb

Producer Suction Ports: Discussion The suction ports were designed to increase the capacity of the 4.5 tubing in the horizontal section while minimizing the pressure drop in the annulus between the 7 liner and the 4.5 tubing. Fluid entering the liner upstream of a suction port will enter the 4.5 tubing through that port and thus be removed from the annulus before the next suction port. This system works very well when the well pair is uniformly heated. However, in this case there is a hot spot close to the heel of the producer and it was desirable to get the fluid from the hot spot to the toe thereby promoting uniform heating along the producer liner. The suction ports made it difficult to achieve this and were thus removed. We also needed to steam the producer and the suction ports which impeded steam to the toe.

26I01: Re-Completed with Steam Splitters Conductor 508.0 mm 139.89 kg/m H-40 ST&C landed at 20.0 mkb KB Elevation: 609.97 m GL Elevation: 604.97 m Surface Casing 339.7 mm 81.1 kg/m J-55 ST&C Surface Casing landed at 92.0 mkb MD Intermediate Casing 244.5 mm 59.53 kg/m L-80 QB2 Production casing landed at 400.0 mkb MD Injection Tubing 139.7 mm J-55 R3 25.3 kg/m TKC40/40 tubing set at 350.75 mkb MD 88.9 mm J-55 R2 17.3 kg/m TKC40/40tubing from 351.7 m 1575.51 mkb MD April 2011 139.7x88.9mm CrossOver 15 14 13 12 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 88.9 mm TKC40/40 tubing with steam splitters to 1575.5 mkb

26P01: Suction Ports Removed Surface Casing 339.7 mm 71.43 kg/m H-40 ST&C Surface Casing landed at 120.0 mkb Intermediate Casing 244.5 mm 59.53 kg/m L80 QB2 Production casing set @ 420.0 mkb Production Tubing: 4.5 in 114.3 mm tubing to 365.0 mkb ESP Landed @ 380 mkb Instrument String 31.7 mm coil landed @ end of tail pipe Include bubble tube at Pump intake 4.5 Tail Pipe September 2011 Liner 177.8 mm 38.7 / 34.2 kg/m L-80 QB2 Liner Hanger 405.0 mkb 405.0 1607.09 mkb

Evolution of SAGD Well Pair Completions Wells 26P01, 26I01 Injector and Producer had similar completions during start up circulation. After start up, producer was re-completed with ESP and suction ports in the production tubing which extends to the toe. The injector was re-completed with 15 steam splitters to promote uniform steam injection down hole. Suction port design was not optimum and the producer was later re-completed with the suction ports removed.

Artificial Lift Subsurface Subsection 4 Pelican Lake SAGD Pilot Approval 11469A 2011 Annual Performance Presentation

Artificial Lift The artificial lift mode for the Grand Rapids A SAGD Pilot producer is Electric Submersible Pump (ESP) Operating pressure range 700 2500 kpa, Bottom hole temperature limit of 207C during production. Can steam past pump at higher temperatures. Lift capacity up to 600 m3/d The artificial lift mode for the Grand Rapids B water source well is Electric Submersible Pump (ESP) Lift capacity up to 750 m3/d

Instrumentation in Wells Subsurface Subsection 5 Pelican Lake SAGD Pilot Approval 11469A 2011 Annual Performance Presentation

Instrumentation In Wells SAGD Well Pair Instrumentation Gas blanket for injector bottom hole pressures. No down hole temperature measurements in injector. Bubble tube for producer bottom hole pressure measurements. Also equipped with 6 thermocouple coiled tubing to the toe. 6 Observation wells 3 are equipped with piezometers. 3 are equipped with thermocouples. Requirements under subsection 3.1.1 5a wellbore schematics, 5c and 5d are included in the Appendix.

Instrumentation In Wells 03/12-11 00/9-10 Thermocouples Piezometers 00/1-10 00/8-10 x 02/8-10 02/5-11 03/5-11 03/6-11 00/4-11 Ground Water obs 02/3-11 02/16-3 x X New Drills 02/13-2 13-2 00/9-3 x 03/12-2 100/5-11 (Swab/Inj test)

Seismic Subsurface Subsection 6 Pelican Lake SAGD Pilot Approval 11469A 2011 Annual Performance Presentation

Seismic Coverage Very small, 1 sq. km, small bin with 10 m size Baseline 3D was shot in winter 2010-2011 Purpose: Baseline seismic for monitoring of steam chamber growth in pilot area Re-shot in 2011-2012 winter, currently being processed

2010 & 2011 3D/4D Seismic Programs

Scheme Performance Subsurface Subsection 7 Pelican Lake SAGD Pilot 2011 Annual Performance Presentation

Scheme Performance Prediction Well pair performance prediction was based on a correlation using a modified Butler s equation and sensitivities from reservoir simulation. CSOR was predicted for the well pair from published correlations for CSOR (Edmunds and Chhina 2002)

Wellhead Steam Quality Steam quality injected into the wells is estimated at 98% Steam is generated at 7500 kpa and saturation temperature of 290 C Actual wellhead injection pressure depends on steam injection rate but has not exceeded 5,000 kpa (264 C) to date

Summary Operating for ~ 15 months Progress has been slow: Had to deal with many unplanned issues Excellent learnings to date: Very relevant to the start up of the commercial project Good reservoir performance: Mechanical issues limited wellbore effectiveness - still less than ½ of the well length Second well pair drilled to achieve original pilot objectives. Major focus is start-up

Project Timelines 2010 2011 2012 Time Period Dec 10, 2010 to Apr 13, 2011 April 13 to May 11 May 11 to June 5 June 14 to July 7 July 7 to Aug 31 Sep 1 to Oct 10 Oct 11 2011 to Jan 24, 2012 Jan 24 to Mar 13 Mar 14 Activity Start-up and Circulation Recompletion Initial SAGD Operations Steam Injection Into Producer Extended SAGD Operations Steam injection into producer, turnaround, ESP replacement, producer recompletion SAGD Operations Steam injection into producer Resuming SAGD Operations

Startup and Circulation (Dec. 10 to April 13) Thermocouple string malfunction Lean Zone Pressure SAGD wells connected to lean zone days after startup 1340 1320 1300 1280 103/5-11 103/6-11 102/8-10 102/3-11 Operations at low pressures 1260 1240 13-Dec 18-Dec 23-Dec 28-Dec 2-Jan 7-Jan 12-Jan

Recompletions (April 13 to May 11, 2011) SAGD producer recompletion went well Casing liner failure and split tubing coupling in SAGD injection well Casing Liner Debris Split Coupling

Temperature Surveys and Thermocouples 210 200 190 180 170 160 150 HEEL TOE Temp (Deg C) 140 130 120 110 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 Injection Liner Failure 30 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 1500 1600 1700 Depth (m) Producer Injector_April16 Injector_April 15 Aug31 TC before SI Prd_Ports Injector_Jan Inj_Liner Problem Seismic Anomaly

SAGD Re Completions SAGD INJECTOR SAGD PRODUCER Thermocouple Tubing Bubble Tube ESP Suction Ports Steam Splitters

Initial SAGD Operations (May 11 to June 5) H2S produced almost immediately Temporary flare system installed to allow production Incinerator installation Relatively low and unstable production rates

July / August SAGD Operations Operations for 8 weeks < 400 m of 1,200 m horizontal well heated up 150 bbls/d oil @ SOR = 3 bbl/bbl Thermocouples2 [Generated from trend display @ 2011-10-06 7:27:04 AM] SAGD-SW026-TT1106F Daily Avg [degc] SAGD-SW026-TT1106E Daily Avg [degc] SAGD-SW026-TT1106D Daily Avg [degc] 225 SAGD-SW026-TT1106C Daily Avg [degc] SAGD-SW026-TT1106B Daily Avg [degc] SAGD-SW026-TT1106A Daily Avg [degc] 200 175 150 degc 125 100 75 50 25 Jul 2011 8 Fri 15 Fri 22 Fri 1 Mon 8 Mon 15 Mon 22 Mon 1 Thu

September and October Operations ESP failed due to damaged cable; removed and installed new ESP Removed producer suction ports Injected steam to toe of producer ESP startup today SAGD PRODUCER Thermocouple Tubing Bubble Tube ESP Scab Liner

2011 Cumulative Injection & Production Volumes December 10 th 2010 to March 1 st 2012 = 43,110 m 3 of steam 50000 45000 40000 Steam 35000 Fluid Volume (m^3) 30000 25000 20000 Oil 15000 10000 5000 0 9-Dec-10 28-Jan-11 19-Mar-11 8-May-11 27-Jun-11 16-Aug-11 5-Oct-11 24-Nov-11 13-Jan-12 Time

2011 Pilot Performance 300 250 Total Fluid Oil Steam SOR Steaming Producer Steaming Producer 12 10 200 8 Rate (m 3 /d) 150 6 SOR 100 4 50 2 0 0 7-Jul 28-Jul 18-Aug 8-Sep 29-Sep 20-Oct 10-Nov 1-Dec 22-Dec 12-Jan 2-Feb 23-Feb *Note: Site turnaround September 12-15th, 2011 Date

2011 Thermocouple Response 103/12-02 Thermocouple located at toe Temperature (C) 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 209 209mTVD 219 Depth (mkb) 229 January 8th 2011 239 April 1st 2011 August 15th 2011 December 31st 2011 247mTVD Lateral distance from Observation well to the well pair = 4.0 m

2011 Thermocouple Response 102/13-02 Thermocouple 400m from toe toward heel Temperature (C) 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 209 209m TVD January 6th 2011 219 April 1st 2011 August 15th 2011 December 31st 2011 Depth (mkb) 229 239 247m TVD Lateral distance from Observation well to the well pair = 4.2 m

2011 Thermocouple Response 102/05-11 Thermocouple located at heel Temperature (C) 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 209 214m TVD 219 January 8th 2011 Depth (mkb) 229 April 1st 2011 August 15th 2011 December 31st 2011 239 252m TVD Lateral distance from Observation well to the well pair = 21.4 m

Key Learnings 1. Project Design and Execution Cooling and gas handling required at low operating pressures 2. Drilling, Completions and Wellbores Improved mud system and larger drilling rigs Ensure wellbore heated up before SAGD operations Ability to divert steam to focus areas of wellbore is critical 3. Operations at Low Pressures 4. Reservoir and Production Lean zone management H 2 S presence

Future Plans Subsurface Subsection 8 Pelican Lake SAGD Pilot Approval 11469A 2011 Annual Performance Presentation

Second Well Pair Profile & Observation wells 03/12-11 00/9-10 Thermocouples Piezometers 00/1-10 00/8-10 x 02/8-10 02/5-11 03/5-11 03/6-11 00/4-11 Ground Water obs 02/3-11 02/16-3 x X New Drills 02/13-2 13-2 00/9-3 x 03/12-2 100/5-11 (Swab/Inj test)

Future Plans A second well pair has been drilled and is being completed. The wells are equipped with 9 5/8 intermediate casing and 1,200m long 7 slotted liner The well pair will have fibre-optic cables for temperature and pressure monitoring The second well pair also has three observation wells for monitoring the lean zone pressures, temperatures and steam chamber growth Waiting for approval to install a third steam generator (30 MMBtu) to increase steam capacity, expand the surface lease area and extend the operating life of the pilot

Pelican Lake SAGD Pilot Proposed Surface Heave Monitoring (InSAR) Scheme Boundary

Surface Operations, Compliance and Issues Not related to Resource Evaluation and Recovery Pelican Lake SAGD Pilot Approval 11469A 2011 Annual Performance Presentation

Surface Operations: Table of Contents 1. Facilities 2. Measurement and Reporting 3. Fresh and Brackish Water Sources and Uses 4. Water Treatment Technology 5. Water, Landfill waste and waste disposal wells 6. Sulphur Production 7. Summary of Environmental Issues 8. Compliance Confirmation 9. Future Plans

Facilities Surface Subsection 1 Pelican Lake SAGD Pilot Approval 11469A 2011 Annual Performance Presentation0

Current Site Plan N Planned site expansion

Block Diagram

Facilities Modifications Installed an incinerator to handle the casing gas Helped with the ESP pumping efficiency to evacuate producer casing

Plant Performance Overall stable plant performance Water Treatment works well Emulsion transported to Greater Pelican Lake battery with no issues Boilers have had minor issues

Measurement and Reporting Surface Subsection 2 Pelican Lake SAGD Pilot Approval 11469A 2011 Annual Performance Presentation

MARP Schematic

MARP Updated MARP submitted March 12th 2012 2011 Amendments New mass flow meters added Incinerator package added to handle casing gas A second casing gas meter added Planned Additions Meters associated with the second well pair

Fresh and Brackish water sources and uses Surface Subsection 3 Pelican Lake SAGD Pilot Approval 11469A 2011 Annual Performance Presentation

Fresh Water Sources Two Fresh water wells 1. 1F1/01-15-082-23W4 in the Grand Rapids B formation 2. 1F1/13-07-082-22W4 in the Grand Rapids B formation No Brackish water wells

Fresh Water Daily Volumes 600 Water Source Well Rate: 1F1/01-15-082-23W4 500 Current Flow (m^3/day) 400 300 200 100 0 10-Dec-10 29-Jan-11 20-Mar-11 9-May-11 28-Jun-11 17-Aug-11 6-Oct-11 25-Nov-11 14-Jan-12 4-Mar-12 Time

Water Treatment Technology Surface Subsection 4 Pelican Lake SAGD Pilot Approval 11469A 2011 Annual Performance Presentation

Water Treatment Block Flow diagram Raw Water from Wells Raw Water Tank Ion Exchange Column Soft Water BFW Tank BFW to Boilers Ion Exchange Column Boiler Blow Down Tank Boiler BD from Boilers Blow down to Disposal Ion Exchange Regen. Waste Boiler Blow down / Regen. Waste Tank BD / Regen. Waste to Disposal Wells

Water Treatment Technology Media Filtering Primary Strong Acid Cation (SAC) Secondary SAC polisher Source water for brine regeneration

Water, Landfill waste and waste disposal wells Surface Subsection 5 Pelican Lake SAGD Pilot Approval 11469A 2011 Annual Performance Presentation

Disposal Well One disposal well 105/12-11-082-23W4 Disposal of boiler blowdown and regeneration waste in the Wabamun/Gramina/Calmar/Nisku

Disposal Well Rates 400 2000.0000 350 Disposal Volumes Disposal Pressures 1500.0000 300 1000.0000 250 500.0000 Volume (m^3) 200 150 0.0000-500.0000 100-1000.0000 No Data during this period 50-1500.0000 0 12-Dec-10 26-Jan-11 12-Mar-11 26-Apr-11 10-Jun-11 25-Jul-11 8-Sep-11 23-Oct-11 7-Dec-11 21-Jan-12-2000.0000 Time

Sulphur Production Surface Subsection 6 Pelican Lake SAGD Pilot Approval 11469A 2011 Annual Performance Presentation

Sulphur Production No sulphur Production

Summary of Environmental Issues Surface Subsection 7 Pelican Lake SAGD Pilot Approval 11469A 2011 Annual Performance Presentation

Environment Update No compliance issues Approval # 269241-00-00 amendment pending Addition of 3rd Steam Generator Extension of Pilot operating period to December 2017 Expansion of Pad 26 surface lease

Compliance Confirmation Surface Subsection 8 Pelican Lake SAGD Pilot Approval 11469A 2011 Annual Performance Presentation

Compliance Confirmation 2 Non-compliance events have occurred since the last performance review December 2010 The maximum bottom hole pressure on the SAGD well pair 102/12-02-082-23W4 was exceeded Self-disclosure document submitted in October 2011 January 2012 The maximum wellhead pressure on the water disposal well 105/12-11-082-23W4 was exceeded Self-disclosure document submitted in February 2012

Future Plans Surface Subsection 9 Pelican Lake SAGD Pilot Approval 11469A 2011 Annual Performance Presentation

Site Plan with Second Well Pair Addition N Planned site expansion

Future Plans Pending approval a third OTSG will be installed in 2012, and the surface lease will be expanded A D-51 application has been submitted, and pending approval, the second well pair will be put into operation

Appendix Pelican Lake SAGD Pilot Approval 11469A 2011 Annual Performance Presentation

Appendix: Pelican Lake SAGD Pilot Observation Wellbore Schematic ECA ECOG A8 BRINT 8-10-82-23 100/08-10-082-23W4 LSD 8-10-82-23W4M Conductor: Landed at 20 m KB / 244.5mm KB= 607.7 mkb GRD= 603.9 mkb PBTD = 326.9 mkb Intermediate Casing: 139.7 mm, 25.30 kg/m, K-55 Landed at 342.5 mkb Cemented to surface with Thermal Cement 2.0m3 of returns Secondary Intermediate Casing: 88.9 mm, 13.84 kg/m, J-55 Landed at 327.26 mkb Cemented to surface with Thermal Cement 6.1m3 of returns Tubing String: 31.8mm, 1.697kg/m, Galvonized Steel Landed at 193.21mKB ESP Pump - 193.21-194.21mKB (Pressure/Temperature sensor for fluid level calculation @ 193.75mKB) Perforations: 254-256mKB 263-267 mkb 276-280 mkb PBTD Cement Top in Secondary Intermediate Casing @ 326.9 mkb Intended Purpose: Pressure (Fluid Level), Temperature, W ater quality monitoring of Grand R apids B aquifer

Appendix: Pelican Lake SAGD Pilot Observation Wellbore Schematic ECA ECOG A9 BRINT 9-10-82-23 100/09-10-082-23W4 LSD 9-10-82-23W4M Conductor: Landed at 20 m KB / 244.5mm KB= 608.9 mkb GRD= 605.1 mkb PBTD = 308.4 mkb Intermediate Casing: 139.7 mm, 25.30 kg/m, K-55 Landed at 337.0 mkb Cemented to surface with Thermal Cement 2.0m3 of returns Secondary Intermediate Casing: 88.9 mm, 13.84 kg/m, J-55 Landed at 321.30 mkb Cemented to surface with Thermal Cement 2.0m3 of returns Tubing String: 31.8mm, 1.697kg/m, Galvonized Steel Landed at 193.21mKB ESP Pump - 193.21-196.78mKB (Pressure/Temperature sensor for fluid level calculation @ 196.32mKB) Perforations: 257-259mKB 266-270 mkb 276-280 mkb PBTD Cement Top in Secondary Intermediate Casing @ 308.4 mkb Intended Purpose: Pressure (Fluid Level), Temperature, W ater quality monitoring of Grand Rapids B aquifer

Appendix: Pelican Lake SAGD Pilot Observation Wellbore Schematic CVE BRINT 4-11-82-23 100/04-11-082-23W4 LSD 4-11-82-23W4M Conductor: Landed at 20 m KB / 406.4mm KB= 608.5 mkb GRD= 604.3 mkb PBTD = 336.0 mkb Surface Casing: 177.8 mm, 25.30 kg/m, H-40 Landed at 99.5 mkb Cemented to surface with Thermal Cement 1.0m3 of returns Intermediate Casing: 114.3 mm, 17.26 kg/m, L-80 Landed at 335.9 mkb Cemented to surface with Thermal Cement 4.0m3 of returns Tubing String: 31.8mm, 1.697kg/m, Galvonized Steel Landed at 194.35mKB ESP Pump - 194.35-195.35mKB (Pressure/Temperature sensor for fluid level calculation @ 193.89mKB) Perforations: 253-255 mkb 263-267 mkb 277-281 mkb Intended Purpose: Pressure (Fluid Level), Temperature, Water quality monitoring of Grand Rapids B aquifer

Appendix: Pelican Lake SAGD Pilot Observation Wellbore Schematic CVE 2C13 BRINT 13-2-82-23 103/13-02-082-23W4 LSD 13-2-82-23W4M Conductor: Landed at 20 m KB / 406.4mm KB= 601.2 mkb GRD= 596.9 mkb PBTD = 328.0 mkb Surface Casing: 177.8 mm, 25.30 kg/m, H-40 Landed at 86.25 mkb Cemented to surface with Thermal Cement 1.5m3 of returns Intermediate Casing: 114.3 mm, 17.26 kg/m, L-80 Landed at 328.0 mkb Cemented to surface with Thermal Cement 4.0m3 of returns Tubing String: 31.8mm, 1.697kg/m, Galvonized Steel Landed at 194.05mKB ESP Pump - 194.05-195.05mKB (Pressure/Temperature sensor for fluid level calculation @ 193.77mKB) Perforations: 246-248 mkb 256-258 mkb 273-277 mkb Intended Purpose: Pressure (Fluid Level), Temperature, Water quality monitoring of Grand Rapids B aquifer

Appendix: Pelican Lake SAGD Pilot Observation Wellbore Schematic ECA ECOG B3 BRINT 3-11-82-23 102/03-11-082-23W4 LSD 3-11-82-23W4M Conductor: Landed at 20 m KB / 244.5mm KB= 611.7 mkb GRD= 607.9 mkb PBTD = 326.0 mkb Intermediate Casing: 139.7 mm, 25.30 kg/m, K-55 Landed at 345.0 mkb Cemented to surface with Thermal Cement 2.0m3 of returns Secondary Intermediate Casing: 88.9 mm, 13.84 kg/m, J-55 Landed at 329.66 mkb Cemented to surface with Thermal Cement 2.0m3 of returns Tubing String: 31.8mm, 1.697kg/m, Galvonized Steel Landed at 149.1mKB ESP Pump - 149.1-150.0mKB (Pressure/Temperature sensor for fluid level calculation @ 149.5mKB) Perforations: 228-230mKB PBTD Cement Top in Secondary Intermediate Casing @ 326.0 mkb Intended Purpose: Pressure (Fluid Level), Temperature, W ater quality monitoring of Grand Rapids A aquifer

Appendix: Pelican Lake SAGD Pilot Observation Wellbore Schematic CVE C12 BRINT 12-11-82-23 103/12-11-082-23W4 LSD 12-11-82-23W4M Conductor: Landed at 22 m KB / 244.5mm KB= 606.3 mkb GRD= 602.3 mkb PBTD = 335.0 mkb Intermediate Casing: 114.3 mm, 17.26 kg/m, L-80 Landed at 335.0 mkb Cemented to surface with Thermal Cement 2.0m3 of returns Tubing String: 31.8mm, 1.697kg/m, Galvonized Steel Landed at 150.0mKB ESP Pump - 150.0-151.0mKB (Pressure/Temperature sensor for fluid level calculation @ 150.4mKB) Perforations: 196-198 mkb Intended Purpose: Pressure (Fluid Level), Temperature, Water quality monitoring of Viking aquifer

Appendix: Pelican Lake SAGD Pilot Observation Wellbore Schematic CVE WS2 BRINT 13-7-82-22 1F2/13-07-082-22W4 LSD 13-7-82-22W4M Conductor: Landed at 20 m KB / 406.4mm KB= 623.9 mkb GRD= 620.4 mkb PBTD = 191.0 mkb Intermediate Casing: 219.1 mm, 35.72 kg/m, J-55 Landed at 152.0mKB Cemented to surface with Thermal Cement 2.0m3 of returns Tubing String: 88.9mm, 13.84kg/m, J-55 Landed at 140.0mKB PCP landed @ 126.4mKB (Pressure/Temperature sensor for fluid level calculation @ 97.0mKB) Liner: 139.7mm, 29.48kg/m, J-55 0.381mm slot size (15 thou) Set depth 140.69-183 mkb (open hole from 183-191 mkb) Intended Purpose: Pressure (Fluid Level), Temperature, W ater quality monitoring of Quaternary/Tertiary aquifer (well pumping consistantly as it provides fresh water for current Wabiskaw polymer flood in the area)

Appendix: Pelican Lake SAGD Pilot Observation Wellbore Schematic 2003 Camp Water Supply Well No. 16-07 NE-07-082-22W4 LSD 11-7-82-22W4M PBTD = 117.0 mkb Intermediate Casing: 152.4 mm, Plastic (PVC) Landed at 112.2mKB Bentonite Chips/Tablets to 106.68mKB Tubing String: 31.75mm, Plastic (PVC) Landed at 140.0mKB ESP landed @ 100.6mKB (Pressure/Temperature sensor for fluid level calculation @ 95.0mKB) Liner: 152.4mm, Stainless Steel 0.381mm slot size (15 thou) Set depth 112.2-116.7mKB Intended Purpose: Pressure (Fluid Level), Temperature, Water quality monitoring of Quaternary aquifer (well pumping consistantly as it provides fresh water Pelican Lake Camp)

Appendix: Pelican Lake SAGD Pilot Observation Wellbore Schematic CVE BRINT 8-10-82-23 102/08-10-082-23W4 LSD 8-10-82-23W4M Conductor: Landed at 22 m KB / 406.4mm KB= 607.8 mkb GRD= 603.6 mkb PBTD = 334.0 mkb Surface Casing: 219.1 mm, 35.72 kg/m, J-55 Landed at 69.5 mkb Cemented to surface with Thermal Cement 2.0m3 of returns Intermediate Casing: 114.3 mm, 17.26 kg/m, L-80 Landed at 333.85 mkb Cemented to surface with Thermal Cement 4.5m3 of returns Sensors: 8 Piezometers (Pressure) and Thermocouples (Temperature) Cemented to Casing Pressure/Temperature Sensor Set Depths: 225.0 mkb 228.2 mkb 231.3 mkb 234.4 mkb 237.6 mkb 240.7 mkb 243.8 mkb 247.0 mkb Intended Purpose: Pressure and Temperature through Grand Rapids A steam chamber

Appendix: Pelican Lake SAGD Pilot Observation Wellbore Schematic CVE 2B BRINT 5-11-82-23 103/05-11-082-23W4 LSD 5-11-82-23W4M Conductor: Landed at 20 mkb / 406.4mm KB= 606.4 mkb GRD= 602.4 mkb PBTD = 333.0 mkb Surface Casing: 219.1 mm, 35.72 kg/m, J-55 Landed at 98.70 mkb Cemented to surface with Thermal Cement 3.0m3 of returns Intermediate Casing: 114.3 mm, 17.26 kg/m, L-80 Landed at 332.15 mkb Cemented to surface with Thermal Cement 4.0m3 of returns Sensors: 8 Piezometers (Pressure) and Thermisters (Temperature) Cemented to Casing Pressure is calculated from capillary tubes set 60m below each piezometer/thermister gauge Temperature is calculated from the set depth of the piezometer/thermister gauge Pressure Measurement Depths: 224.0 mkb 227.1 mkb 230.3 mkb 233.4 mkb 236.6 mkb 239.7 mkb 242.9 mkb 246.0 mkb Intended Purpose: Pressure and Temperature through Grand Rapids A steam chamber

Appendix: Pelican Lake SAGD Pilot Observation Wellbore Schematic ECA ECOG B5 BRINT 5-11-82-23 102/05-11-082-23W4 LSD 5-11-82-23W4M Conductor: Landed at 20 mkb / 244.5mm KB= 606.9 mkb GRD= 603.1 mkb PBTD = 312.7 mkb Intermediate Casing: 139.7 mm, 25.30 kg/m, K-55 Landed at 339.5 mkb Cemented to surface with Thermal Cement 2.0m3 of returns Secondary Intermediate Casing: 88.9 mm, 13.84 kg/m, J-55 Landed at 317.9 mkb Cemented to surface with Thermal Cement 1.5m3 of returns Thermocouple String: WIKA 20 Point Thermocouple Landed 214.0-252.0 mkb Each Thermocouple is 2 m apart along the landing depth length PBTD Cement Top in Secondary Intermediate Casing @ 312.7 mkb Intended Purpose: Temperature monitoring of Grand Rapids A steam chamber

Appendix: Pelican Lake SAGD Pilot Observation Wellbore Schematic ECA ECOG C13 BRINT 13-2-82-23 102/13-02-082-23W4 LSD 13-2-82-23W4M Conductor: Landed at 23 mkb / 244.5mm KB= 601.0 mkb GRD= 596.9 mkb PBTD = 328.0 mkb Intermediate Casing: 177.8 mm, 38.69 kg/m, L-80 Landed at 328.0 mkb Cemented to surface with Thermal Cement 2.0m3 of returns Thermocouple String: WIKA 20 Point Thermocouple Landed 209.0-247.0 mkb Each Thermocouple is 2 m apart along the landing depth length Intended Purpose: Temperature monitoring of Grand Rapids A steam chamber

Appendix: Pelican Lake SAGD Pilot Observation Wellbore Schematic CVE BRINTNELL 12-2-82-23 103/12-02-082-23W4 LSD 12-2-82-23W4M Conductor: Landed at 24.2 m KB / 406.4mm KB= 599.9 mkb GRD= 595.7 mkb PBTD = 325.0 mkb Surface Casing: 177.8 mm, 25.30 kg/m, H-40 Landed at 86.25 mkb Cemented to surface with Thermal Cement 2.0m3 of returns Intermediate Casing: 114.3 mm, 17.26 kg/m, L-80 Landed at 324.0 mkb Cemented to surface with Thermal Cement 1.0m3 of returns Thermocouple String: WIKA 20 Point Thermocouple Landed 209.0-247.0 mkb Each Thermocouple is 2 m apart along the landing depth length Intended Purpose: Temperature monitoring of Grand Rapids A steam chamber

Appendix: Pelican Lake SAGD Pilot Observation Wellbore Schematic CVE B6 BRINT 6-11-82-23 103/06-11-082-23W4 LSD 6-11-82-23W4M Conductor: Landed at 25 m KB / 244.5mm KB= 611.3 mkb GRD= 607.3 mkb PBTD = 339.5 mkb Intermediate Casing: 177.8 mm, 38.69 kg/m, L-80 Landed at 339.5 mkb Cemented to surface with Thermal Cement 2.0m3 of returns Tubing String: 73.0 mm, 9.67kg/m, J-55 Landed at 241.92mKB Packer to isolate zones landed at 236.49mKB Pressure/Temperature Sensor banded to tubing at 208.2mKB (above packer) Pressure/Temperature Sensor deployed through tubing landed at 241.6mKB (below packer) Perforations: 228-230 mkb 244-246 mkb Intended Purpose: Pressure (Fluid Level) and Temperature monitoring of Grand Rapids A zone

Appendix: Pelican Lake SAGD Pilot Observation wells data Table : Thermocouples in Observation wells UWI Location from SAGD well pair toe (m) Lateral Distance (m) 102/05-11-082-23W4/00 1200 21.4 102/13-02-082-23W4/00 400 4.2 103/12-02-082-23W4/00 10 4.0 Table : Piezometers in Observation wells UWI Location from SAGD well pair toe (m) Lateral Distance (m) 103/05-11-082-23W4/00 1200 21 102/08-10-082-23W4/00 1200 40 103/06-11-082-23W4/00 1200 400

Appendix: Pelican Lake SAGD Pilot Groundwater Observation wells data Table : Groundwater Observation wells UWI Perf. Interval TVD (m) Zone Lateral Difference from well pair (m) 102/03-11-082-23W4/00 228-230 GR A 408 E 103/12-11-082-23W4/00 196-198 VIKING 468 N 100/09-10-082-23W4/00 257-259 266-270 276-280 100/08-10-082-23W4/00 254-256 263-267 276-280 103/13-02-082-23W4/00 246-248 256-258 273-277 100/04-11-082-23W4/00 253-255 263-267 277-281 GR B GR B GR B GR B 252 N 179 W 20 E 10 E

Appendix: Pelican Lake SAGD Pilot Lean Zone Pressures Weekly Report- Lean Zone pressures [Generated from trend display @ 2011-12-20 9:34:37 AM] 2500 530 OW-09PT100A1 Daily Avg [kpa] OW-14PT100A8 Daily Avg [kpa] OW-16PT100A8 Daily Avg [kpa] 1180 520 1170 2250 510 OW-16PT100A8 Daily Avg [kpa] 500 2000 490 1750 1500 OW-09PT100A1 Daily Avg [kpa] 480 470 460 1160 1150 1140 1130 OW-14PT100A8 Daily Avg [kpa] 1250 450 1120 440 1110 2011 Apr Jul Oct Jan 2012

Appendix: Pelican Lake SAGD Pilot Downhole Pressures of Producer and Injector Injector SAGD-SW026-PIT2604 Daily Avg [kpa] [2 Pen] Historical Trend Producer SAGD-SW026-PIT2607 Daily Avg [kpa] 3000 2500 2000 kpa 1500 1000 500-0 2011 Apr Jul Oct Jan 2012