Scope of Discussion. Foundation Related Issues. Foundation Preparation and Treatment During Dam Construction 10/14/2014

Similar documents
EMBANKMENT DAM SEEPAGE MODIFICATIONS CHOICES AND CONSIDERATIONS. John W. France, PE, D.WRE 1 ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION

VERTICAL BARRIERS SLURRY TRENCH BARRIERS: excavation equipment. prof. E. Fratalocchi Environmental Geotechnics Waste and polluted sites containment

Ground Improvement. Cutter Soil Mixing Multi-Axis Soil Mixing Deep Soil Mixing Jet Grouting Vibro Systems Specialized Geotechnical Grouting

Compaction and Jet Grouting

Ground Improvement for Mitigation of Failure Risks to Existing Embankment Dams

Misan University - College of Engineering Civil Engineering Department

Grouting Bilfinger Spezialtiefbau GmbH

CHAPTER 8 SEEPAGE CONTROL IN EMBANKMENTS

Ground Improvement Techniques

Construction Technology B (CON4313)

Soldier Pile Walls Soil Nail Systems Secant Piling Soil Mix Walls Underpinning Slope Stabilization

RIGID INCLUSIONS. Rigid Inclusions offer an economical approach for building on sites underlain by soft soil.

Civil Engineering Construction I (CBE5031)

INSTITUTE OF AERONAUTICAL ENGINEERING (Autonomous) Dundigal, Hyderabad CIVIL ENGINEERING

COPYRIGHTED MATERIAL. Contents PART ONE: THEORY...1. Preface to the Third Edition xiii. About the Authors xv. Acknowledgements xvii

Figure (12.1) Foundation Grouting

LECTURE 35. Module 10 : Improvement of rock mass responses 10.4 UNDERGROUND SUPPORTS. Steel Arch support and steel ribs & laggings

Ground improvement support using Confined aggregate piers in soft soil. Brian Metcalfe, P.E. Director of Engineering Geopier Foundation Company

DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION OF AN EMBANKMENT DAM IN NEW SOUTH WALES, AUSTRALIA

July 2011 BUREAU OF INDIAN STANDARDS. Draft Indian Standard

> GRouTING systems. The experience and expertise to deliver the right grouting solution for the job. Grouting is the most diverse

LIMITED MOBILITY GROUTING -- PRACTICE IN NORTH AMERICA. Michael Byle, D.GE, F.ASCE,

Golder Associates Innovative Applications (GAIA) Inc.

DIAPHRAGM WALLS, CUT-OFF WALLS AND SLURRY WALLS

SECTION XXXXX AGGREGATE PIERS PART 1 - GENERAL

Chapter 1. Introduction to Engineering Ground Modification. The Need for Engineered Ground Improvement

Successful Foundation Preparations in Karst Bedrock of the Masonry Section of Wolf Creek Dam

Deep Foundations By. J. Paul Guyer, P.E., R.A. PDHLibrary Course No PDH HOURS

Brochure E. The Soilcrete Jet Grouting Process

SECTION 44 SHOTCRETE, CAST CONCRETE CHANNEL LINING, AND GROUTED COBBLE TABLE OF CONTENTS

Ground Improvement. Martin G. Taube, P.E., P.G. February 4, 2003

Brochure 66-01E. Compaction Grouting

Laboratory modeling of erosion potential of seepage barrier material

DOUBLE ROW GROUT CURTAIN DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION FOR CEDAR CREEK DAM IN MALAKOFF, TEXAS. Daniel P. Bole 1 Marc T. Miller, P.E. 2 Billy L.

Slurry Trench / Diaphragm Walls

Ground Improvement Specialists

Agenda. Alternative Measures (for Cutoffs) for Dams on Karst. Failure Modes Three Techniques. 1. Introduction and Background

CE 6012 Ground Improvement Techniques Question Bank

A Case Study: Foundation Design in Liquefiable Site

Assalamualaikum & Good Morning (May All Of You Gain A Better Understanding)

Introduction to Foundations on Fill and Backfilling

SECTION EROSION CONTROL DEVICES

Construction and Geotechnical Issues

Ground Modification Applications for Bio-Fuel Plants Raymond J. Franz, P.E. Roselle, IL

APPENDIX F GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION UPDATE CITY OF SANTA CRUZ D RAFT EIR L A B AHIA H OTEL JANUARY 2014

Geotechnical Engineering

Typical flow net for the flow beneath the dam with heel cutoff wall [Lambe & R.V. Whitman (1979)]

twenty six concrete construction: foundation design ELEMENTS OF ARCHITECTURAL STRUCTURES: FORM, BEHAVIOR, AND DESIGN DR. ANNE NICHOLS SPRING 2013

KIEWIT FOUNDATIONS CO.

Chapter 8 Anchoring Structures

An Introduction to Seepage, Slope and Settlement of Levees

Remedial grouting works to two dams in Hong Kong

Ponds: planning, design, and construction

GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION PROPOSED OUTFALL LOCATION CITY OF MORGAN S POINT DRAINAGE HARRIS COUNTY, TEXAS REPORT NO

Modular Course on Foundations and Earth retaining Structures for Building and Infrastructure Projects 9th March 2000

CUTTER SOIL MIXED WALL SHORING AND SEEPAGE CUT OFF OFFICE BUILDING NEAR WATERFRONT

TSAILE DAM MODIFICATION PROJECT Unearthing a Safer Dam

twenty seven concrete construction: foundation design Foundation Structural vs. Foundation Design Structural vs. Foundation Design

twenty four foundations and retaining walls Foundation Structural vs. Foundation Design Structural vs. Foundation Design

Tunnelling and Underground. Construction Technology

SOIL AND FOUNDATION INVESTIGATION PROPOSED DUPLEX 3966 VRAIN STREET DENVER, COLORADO

Chapter 3: Summaries of Case Histories

SECTION EROSION CONTROLS

APPLICATIONS SOILFRAC SOILCRETE PERMEATION COMPACTION INFILL. Underpinning. Settlement Control. Settlement Reversal. Void Grouting.

UNIFIED FACILITIES GUIDE SPECIFICATIONS

SECTION 44 SHOTCRETE, CAST CONCRETE CHANNEL LINING, AND GROUTED COBBLE TABLE OF CONTENTS

A COLLABORATIVE SUCCESS CONSTRUCTION OF THE MORMON ISLAND AUXILIARY DAM KEY-BLOCK FOR SEISMIC REHABILITATION. Abstract

Passion for Progress... and Progress in Water Resource Development

SECTION 44 SHOTCRETE, CAST CONCRETE CHANNEL LINING, AND GROUTED COBBLE TABLE OF CONTENTS

Ground Improvement Techniques: Dynamic Compaction Martin Larisch & Tim Pervan

SECTION XXXXX STONE COLUMNS PART 1 - GENERAL

Review and Feasibility Assessment of Offshore Ground Improvement Methods

204 - EXCAVATION AND BACKFILL FOR STRUCTURES SECTION 204 EXCAVATION AND BACKFILL FOR STRUCTURES. Granular Backfill (Wingwalls) (Set Price)

Problems in Improvement Evaluation, QA and QC

IV B.Tech I Semester Regular/Supplementary Examinations, Nov/Dec- 2014

C. Foundation stabilization for pipe and utility structures.

SECTION / ENGINEERED AGGREGATE PIERS (SOIL REINFORCEMENT AND FOUNDATION SYSTEM)

Paul Brunner, Larry Dacus, Doug Handen. Repairs to Concrete-Lined V-Ditch Alternatives Evaluation

A COLLABORATIVE SUCCESS CONSTRUCTION OF THE MORMON ISLAND AUXILIARY DAM KEY-BLOCK FOR SEISMIC REHABILITATION. Abstract

NPTEL Course on Ground Improvement

The Problem. Embankment Dams on Karstic Limestone, Soluble and Erodible Foundations: Challenges and Solutions GEOSYSTEMS, L.P.

Water Well Decommissioning Guidelines

THENI KAMMAVAR SANGAM COLLEGE OF TECHNOLOGY CE2033- GROUND IMPROVEMENT TECHNIQUES UNIT 1 INTRODUCTION

3.5 GEOLOGY, SOILS, AND GROUNDWATER

USE OF TRENCH DRAINS TO IMPROVE CHRONIC EMBANKMENT STABILITY PROBLEMS. and SHANNON & WILSON, INC. ABSTRACT

Seepage Cutoffs for Dams: Reassertion of the Composite Wall Concept

DHANALAKSHMI COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING, CHENNAI DEPARTMENT OF CIVIL ENGINEERING 2 MARK QUESTIONS WITH ANSWERS CE FOUNDATION ENGINEERING UNIT 1

Plastic concrete cutoff walls have been used for

Proceedings of the 10 th Australia New Zealand Conference on Geo-Mechanics, Common Ground Brisbane Australia, October 2007

ASSOCIATION OF STATE DAM SAFETY OFFICIALS VOLUME 14 ISSUE ISSN

GROUND ENGINEERING. Vibro Ground Improvement

APPENDIX 5: CONSTRUCTION CHECKLISTS

1993 SPECIFICATIONS CSJ SPECIAL SPECIFICATION ITEM 4110 CONCRETE ENCASED DUCT BANK

SECTION TRENCHING

SLURRY WALLS FOR SEEPAGE CUTOFF IN LEVEE APPLICATIONS RECENT EXPERIENCE AND CONSTRUCTION CHALLENGES IN THE NORTHERN CENTRAL VALLEY OF CALIFORNIA

SITE INVESTIGATION. Foundation Engineering

Behavior of Geosynthetic-Reinforced Earth

June i TABLE OF CONTENTS

Earth Retaining System

US ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS ALASKA DISTRICT BUILDING STRONG. 21 September Coleman Chalup, P.E. Lead Engineer USACE Alaska District

Transcription:

Foundation Preparation and Treatment During Dam Construction John W. France, PE, D.WRE URS Corporation Denver, Colorado October 14, 2014 1 Scope of Discussion Broad discussion of treatment of foundations applicable to: Dam rehabilitation / modification New dam construction Topics addressed: Treatment of exposed rock surfaces Grouting (limited treatment) Treatment of soil foundations (for other than seepage) Foundation seepage reduction Foundation seepage collection and control 2 Foundation Related Issues Support for overlying structures Settlement of overlying structures Foundation seepage Quantity Internal erosion (piping) Uplift pressure Most foundation treatment efforts are aimed at addressing seepage issues 3 1

Embankment Foundation Seepage Concerns -1 Foundation filter Filtered exit Unfiltered exit Filtered exit Unfiltered exit Open-work gravel layer Filtered exit Bedrock, open-jointed 4 Embankment Foundation Seepage Concerns -2 5 Embankment Foundation Seepage Concerns -3 6 2

Embankment Foundation Seepage Concerns -4 Core Material Cavity pr ogresses to reser voir / high per meabl e zone Coarse downstream shel l Material erodes into downstream em bankment or exits at toe Genera l se epag e gradi ent fro m foundation into embankment Jointed rock foundation 7 Treatment of Exposed Rock Surfaces Foundation shaping Surface treatment Cleaning Dental concrete Slush grouting Shotcrete 8 Shaping of Rock Surface Reduces cracking potential Limits differential settlement Limits stress concentrations Facilitates compaction 9 3

Surface Treatment Prevents internal erosion of embankment soil into open joints/discontinuities Prevents internal erosion along the foundation contact Prevents the loss of joint filling materials 10 Rock Treatment Varies With Zones Most critical beneath core and filters Less critical but beneficial beneath shells 11 Foundation Surface Preparation for Earthfill Core and Filter/Drain Zones Fill with dental concrete Fill with slush grout or dental concrete Remove promontories 1 0.5 Remove overhang at slope of 0.5:1 or flatter; or fill with dental concrete at a slope of 0.5:1 or flatter Remove loose material and clean Typical Foundation Treatment Details 12 4

Shaping and Surface Treatment in Core Trench 1 1 (min) Remove overhangs and steep slopes Remove or shape rock protrusions Fill with concrete Remove loose blocks and backfill with concrete 6 (typical) Fill with concrete 1 Clean depressions and backfill with 2 concrete for depressions greater than 6 Surface Treatment and Shaping in Core Trench Transverse Direction 1 2 1 (min) 1 6 (typical) Remove overhangs 2 1 Remove or shape rock protrusions 1 2 2 1 Fill with concrete Surface Treatment and Shaping in Core Trench Longitudinal Direction 13 Details for Foundation Shaping Remove overhangs 0.5H:1V or flatter 6 (min) Greater than 1 foot, excavate OR place dental concrete within core zone (outside core zone higher than 5 feet) 0.5H:1V or flatter 45⁰ (min) 6 (min) 14 Foundation Shaping Remove overhangs Shape to facilitate fill placement Methods Excavator Hoe Rams Jack Hammers Trim Blasting 15 5

Foundation Shaping 16 Overhang Formwork 17 Overhang Concrete 18 6

10/14/2014 Shaping Facilitates Compaction: Abutment Rolling 19 Shaping Facilitates Compaction : Wheel Rolling 20 Foundation Cleaning- Blade Cleaning Removes majority of loose materials prior to blowing with air/water 21 7

Foundation Cleaning- Hand Work Labor Intensive Shovels Jackhammers Picks Crow Bars Rock Hammers Vacuums 22 Foundation Cleaning: Brushing 23 Foundation Cleaning-High Pressure Air / Water Effective in moving and dislodging loose debris form irregular surface 24 8

Foundation Cleaning-High Pressure Air / Water 25 Dental Treatment Three types Backfill concrete Dental concrete Slush grout 26 Backfill Concrete for Leveling 27 9

Backfill Concrete for Shaping Used to treat steep ledges on abutments 28 Backfill Concrete for Shaping 29 Dental Concrete Used to treat larger discontinuities (joints, fractures, etc.) and smaller irregularities 30 10

Dental Concrete 31 Dental Concrete Note Dental concrete placed to just below rock surface to minimize thin edges 32 Dental Concrete 33 11

Slush Grout Used to treat Small discontinuities (joints, fractures, etc.) Typically a sanded mortar Individual discontinuities Dig out and clean Place by pouring, pushing, rodding, funneling Do not allow to spread out on rock surface Will need to be chipped off rock surface 34 Slush Grout Multiple closely spaced fractures Broom with stiff bristle broom Place on foundation directly ahead of initial core placement 35 Slush Grout 36 12

Slush Grout 37 Slush Grout 38 Shotcrete Used to treat Highly fractured shattered zones of rock Shotcrete Non-fiber reinforced Fiber reinforced Stronger Less likely to crack 39 13

Shotcrete Wet-Mix Shotcrete Process Cement, aggregate and water mixed by mechanical methods Air introduced at nozzle Nozzleman has no control over shotcrete mixture Dry-Mix Shotcrete Process Cement, aggregate and air are blown to nozzle where water is added Nozzleman controls amount of water in shotcrete 40 Shotcrete Surface Preparation Place on cleaned approved foundation free of water Surface dampened before shotcrete application Install ground wires or pins on surface to guide placement thickness Placement Discharge from nozzle between 0.5 and 1.5 m from surface Buildup to specified thickness using several passes Cure similar to backfill concrete 41 Slaking Protection: Hard 42 14

Slaking Protection: High Rough Excavation 43 Question Session No. 1 44 Grouting Reduce hydraulic conductivity of foundation and thereby seepage under the dam by intersecting and filling factures and voids within the rock mass. By its nature, the extent of the work required for grouting cannot be known until excavation is complete and grouting program is implemented 45 15

Grouting Grouting is a specialty construction process and must be directed by people with experienced personnel 46 Grouting Cautions Limited soils for which grouting is effective Soils (and soft rock) can be hydrofractured In rock, grout only penetrates water-and airfilled features Grout may deteriorate over time; or at least effectiveness of a grout curtain may deteriorate over time 47 Types of Grouting Blanket Grouting Low pressure shallow holes located in a pattern across the foundation surface Curtain Grouting Low pressure shallow hole grouting and intermediate to high pressure grouting of deeper zones in rows of holes Stitch Grouting Grouting of fault or shear zones in a pattern of holes designed to intersect and cross the zone at various selected depths 48 16

Example Grouting Layout 49 Grouting Program Elements Spacing Depth Number of lines (grout curtain) Sequence Pressure Grout mixes Monitoring and control 50 Foundation Grouting Holes oriented to best intersect defects depends on geology Hole pattern; primary, secondary, tertiary Pressures limited to preclude hydraulic fracture Grouting of bore holes in stages Upstage or ascending stage Downstage or descending stage 51 17

Foundation Grouting Grout mixes A range of mixes Start thin and thicken as needed Balanced, stable mixes essentially no bleed Reference points for uplift check Verification water test holes after grouting Procedures highly dependent on nature of foundation Grouting as final exploration 52 Split Spacing Method Primary, secondary, tertiary, etc. to closure P S T T P P S T T P P S T T P First Second Third 53 Stage Grouting Ascending Stage Grouting Grout hole drilled complete to bottom Grout starting with bottom stage and work up to top of hole Descending Stage Grouting Grout hole drilled stopped due to partial or total loss of circulation, artesian flow, caving conditions, or grout flow to adjacent holes Grout stage, washout and continue to drill 54 18

Groutability Readily groutable k > 1 x 10-3 cm/sec (100 lugeons) Marginally groutable k ~ 1 x 10-4 cm/sec (10 lugeons) Barely groutable k < 1 x 10-5 cm/sec (1 lugeon) Effective grouting likely does not reduce rock mass permeability to less than about k < 1 x 10-5 cm/sec (1 lugeon) 55 Grouting Drill Rigs 56 Access Challenges 57 19

Monitoring / Recording Computerized Real Time Monitoring and Assessment System Records, displays, stores and analyzes Water pressure testing data Grouting data Measures Flow Pressure Lugeon value Cumulative grout volume A number of other parameters 58 More Information on Grouting ASDSO Webinar October 9, 2012 Introduction to Grouting for Dams 59 Question Session No. 2 60 20

Treatment of Soil Foundations Reasons for soil foundation treatment Control settlement Provide stability (static or seismic) Control seepage this will be dealt with separately later in the presentation 61 Settlement Soils of concern: Generally compressible clays and silts For very high dams, loose sands or even soft rock could possibly be a concern, but unusual Treatment options for compressible soils Remove and replace Wick drains and / or staged construction 62 Excavate and Replace Dewatering often required 63 21

Wick Drains 64 Wick Drains Installed on patterns to promote drainage Used to accelerate consolidation and strength gain in staged embankment construction Used to enhance benefits of improvement methods (dynamic compaction, vibroflotation, vibrocompaction piles, compaction grouting) in finer-grained soils 65 65 Stability Static stability not typically a concern except for soft, plastic clays or silts Seismic stability can be a concern for a wider range of soils particularly for loose, cohesionless soils (liquefaction) Treatment options to improve stability Remove and replace Increase strength with in-situ treatment Reinforce 66 22

In-Situ Treatment to Increase Strength Dynamic compaction Vibroflotation Vibro-replacement (stone columns) Compaction grouting For all methods verification testing would be required, and often test sections are needed. 67 Dynamic Compaction Dropping weights to create vibrations that densify the soil Weights are dropped on a controlled pattern Effectiveness verified indirectly through before and after investigations 68 68 Dynamic Compaction Reference: Densification, Inc. 69 23

Dynamic Compaction - Limitations Effectiveness diminishes with depth practical limit is about 30 feet Most effective in clean, cohesionlesssoil; less effective as fines content increases Not effective in plastic soils 70 70 Vibroflotaion Densifyingsoil in place with a vibratory probe with water injection Probes completed on a controlled, relatively closely spaced pattern Effectiveness verified indirectly through before and after investigations 71 71 Vibroflotation Reference: Hayward Baker 72 72 24

Vibroflotation 73 73 Vibroflotation- Limitations Most effective in clean, cohesionlesssoil; less effective as fines content increases Not effective in plastic soils 74 74 Vibro-Compaction Piles (Stone Columns) Similar to vibroflotation, except that gravel fill is placed in the probe hole Can be done with water (wet method) or without water (dry method) Effectiveness in finer-grained soils can be enhanced with wick drains Effectiveness verified indirectly with before and after investigations 75 75 25

Vibro-Compaction Piles Reference: Hayward Baker 76 76 Vibro-Compaction Piles - Limitations Most effective in clean, cohesionlesssoil; less effective as fines content increases Not effective in plastic soils Mixing of gravel with in situ soil, rather than densification has been observed in some soft or very loose finer-grained soils 77 77 Compaction Grouting Injection of low mobility (low slump) grout to densify soil Completed in holes drilled on a pattern Effectiveness verified indirectly through before and after investigations 78 78 26

Compaction Grouting Drill Rod Compaction Grout Casing Casing Casing 79 79 Compaction Grouting - Limitations Does not include vibration, so effectiveness in cohesionlesssoils may be limited May have more effectiveness in finer grained soils, but very low permeabilities may limit effectiveness 80 80 Reinforcement Shear walls Replaced or modified blocks Structural elements (e.g. piles, anchors, MSER) Composite strengths Can be combined with berms and buttresses 81 81 27

Shear Walls 82 82 Shear Wall Construction Methods Cement deep soil mixing (CDSM) Jet grouting 83 83 Cement Deep Soil Mixing (CDSM*) Mixing in situ soils with cement grout or other slurries Using multiple shaft mixing tools with cutting heads and mixing paddles, or Using wheels on horizontal axis or trenching techniques Equipment illustrated later in seepage barrier wall discussion * aka DSM, DMM 84 84 28

Jet Grouting Can limit treatment to layers at depth. 85 Jet Grout Blocks WickiupDam, OR 86 86 In Situ Reinforcement - Piles Reinforcing Piles Thin Weak Layer Piles essentially act as shear pins Used at Sardis Dam, MI for seismic rehabilitation 87 87 29

Composite Strength Plan View Reinforcing Elements In Situ Soils 88 88 Composite Strength If: Strength of in situ soil is c i + σ tan φ i Strength of reinforcement is c r + σ tan φ r Replacement ratio = R r = A r / A tot A r = area of reinforcement elements A tot = total area Then: Composite strength: c i + (c r -c i ) R r + tan φ i + (tan φ r -tan φ i ) R r Based strictly on an area ratio Strain incompatibility could be an issue 89 89 Question Session No. 3 90 30

Foundation Seepage Cut Off Methods Grouting discussed earlier Low Permeability Blankets Barrier Walls Note: Cut off is in quotes, because it is very difficult to truly cut off seepage. 91 Low Permeability Blankets Upstream blanket Soil Blankets Geomembranes Blankets may need to be very long 92 Limited Effectiveness of Upstream Blankets Reference: Cedergren(1989) 93 31

Seepage Barrier Walls: Foundation and Embankment Embankment Pervious Foundation Impervious Foundation 94 Seepage Barrier Walls: Foundation and Partial Embankment Embankment Pervious Foundation Impervious Foundation Wall needs to connect to water barrier in the embankment 95 Seepage Barrier Walls: Foundation Only Embankment Pervious Foundation Impervious Foundation Wall needs to connect to water barrier in the embankment 96 32

Seepage Barrier Walls: Partial Cutoff Embankment Pervious Foundation 97 Limited Effectiveness of Partially- Penetrating Cutoffs Reference: Cedergren(1989) 98 Seepage Barrier Walls Continuous Trench Walls Soil Mix Walls Element Walls (Panel) Jet Grouting Walls (not discussed further) Sheet Pile Walls 99 33

Continuous Trench Barrier Walls 100 Continuous Trench Barrier Walls Salient Features Slurry Supported Excavation No Backfill Restrictions No Backfill Joints Non-Structural Low Permeability Typical Backfills Soil-Bentonite (SB) Cement-Bentonite(CB) Soil-Cement-Bentonite (SCB) 101 Excavators Long Boom / Long Stick Excavator (to 80 to 90 ft) Clamshell / Grab Trencher (with slurry) 102 34

Backfill Equipment Bulldozer and Excavator Mixing Box CB Mix Plant No end stops No tremie (except for great depths) 103 Continuous Wall Benefits Low cost Rapid Construction Low permeability Applicable to most soil types No joints 104 Cement Deep Soil Mixing (CDSM*) Mixing in situ soils with cement grout or other slurries Using multiple shaft mixing tools with cutting heads and mixing paddles, or Using wheels on horizontal axis or trenching techniques To depths exceeding 100 ft * aka DSM, DMM 105 35

RSW (triple auger) 106 Cutter Soil Mixing (CSM) 107 107 Cutter Soil Mixing (CSM) Herbert Hoover Dike 108 36

TRD Method (Trench Cutting RemixingDeep Wall Method) Soil-Cement- Bentonite 109 TRD Wall Construction -Herbert Hoover Dike TRD Grout Batch Plant 110 Top of Exposed TRD Wall -Herbert Hoover Dike Top of Wall 111 37

Element Barrier Walls Constructed of individual elements, connected together to provide continuous wall Different types of equipment Constructed in primary / secondary sequence Practical to large depths, 250 feet plus directional control becomes very important at depth 112 Primary Elements 113 Secondary Elements 114 38

Element Wall Configurations Primary Elements Installed First Secondary Elements Fill Between P S P P S P S P P S P S P 115 115 Grab or Clam Shell 116 Hydromill(Hydrofraise) 117 39

Hydromill(Hydrofraise) 118 Sheetpiles Conventional sheetpiles can be used for temporary or permanent seepage barriers Sheetpiles can be either steel or plastic (vinyl) Issues include Corrosion of steel sheetpile Buckling of steel or plastic sheetpile Lack of advancement Interlock separation Interlock leakage 119 120 40

Foundation Seepage Collection and Control Methods Foundation Drains Relief Wells Approaches shown are to address only foundation seepage, not embankments; often combined with embankment treatments 121 Shallow Toe Drain For limited shallow foundation seepage Likely requires dewatering for rehabilitation May require reservoir lowering for rehabilitation 122 Deep Toe Drain For more extensive, deep foundation seepage Almost certainly requires dewatering for rehabilitation Likely requires reservoir lowering for rehabilitation 123 41

Toe Drain and Berm Berm provides resistance for pressure and improved stability 124 Trench Toe Drain Trench and Berm Drain trench With slurry methods, trench drain can be constructed without dewatering Potential construction issues 125 Relief Wells Low permeability layer Confined aquifer with seepage pressure xx x xx x x 126 126 42

Relief Wells Relieve pore pressures and lower piezometric surface within confined pervious foundation strata Reduce uplift and improve stability Control exit gradients and reduce piping potential Maintenance required Drain trench or toe drain may be better alternative 127 Question Session No. 4 128 Post Event Evaluation & Quiz Please click the following link to take the Seminar Evaluation and Quiz: http://e02.commpartners.com/users/asdso/posttes t.php?id=14074 You must complete the Seminar Evaluation and Quiz to receive PDH credit hours 129 43