MTA - NEW YORK CITY TRANSIT 2 BROADWAY NEW YORK, NY 10004 DIVISION OF MATERIEL web.mta.info/nyct/procure/nyctproc.htm Vreplies@nyct.com 0000149475 Contract #CM-1058 NOTICE -OF ADDENDUM ADDENDUM #1 INCLUDES DRAWING(~:( ) YES (X) NO CURRENT OPENING/DUE DATE: 2/1/17
2 Broadway Veroruque Hakim New York, NY 10004 President I) New York City Transit January 6,2017 ADDENDUM NO.1 CONTRACT CM-1058 SSE# 0000149475 REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS FOR INDEFINITE QUANTITY PLANNING and CONCEPTUAL ENGINEERING SUPPORT for MISCELLANEOUS CAPITAL PROJECTS TO ALL PROSPECTIVE PROPOSERS: A Project Overview meeting has been scheduled for Tuesday, January 17, 2017 from 1:OOPM - 2:30PM at the following location: New York City Transit 2 Broadway, 5 th Floor Conference Room A5.01 New York, NY 10004 Please limit the number of attendees to two (2) per firm. Reminder: Be sure to acknowledge this addendum in your proposal. Failure to do so may result in rejection of your proposal. Please be governed accordingly. ~7Z ~ HOSJeFas Assistant Chief Procurement Officer Capital Program Unit Department of Materiel MTA New York City Transit is an agency of the Metropolitan Tranuportatton Authority, State of New York 672430
anew York City Transit (NYCT) DATE: December 30,2016 CONSTRUCTION/ARCHITECTURAL & ENGINEERING CONTRACT SOLICITATION NOTICE/PROJECT OVERVIEW MTA-NYCT IS NOW ADVERTISING FOR THE FOLLOWING: SSE#: 0000149475 OPENINGIDUE DATE: 2/1/17 TYPE OF SOLICITATION: I DOCUMENT AVAILABILITY DATE: SOLICITATION TITLE: CM-1058: Indefinite Quantity Planning & Conceptual Engineering Support for Miscellaneous Capital Projects DESCRIPTION: MTA New York City Transit (NYCT) is seeking to retain the services of an experienced Consultant to perform functiona l planning and conceptual engineering support for miscellaneous capital projects on an "As Needed" Task Order basis. A multi-disciplinary planning/engineering Consultant is required with specific expertise in civil/structural engineering ; construction cost estimating and scheduling ; engineering economic analysis; technical writing; architectural engineering; transportation engineering ; industrial engineering ; mechanical engineering ; electrical engineering; transportation planning and transit operations planning and analysis to supplement in-house staff when such services are required for the planning and development of miscellaneous capital projects. The Consultant under this contract shall be prepared to develop functional (physical and operational) feasibility studies, engineering and architectural design studies (at both the conceptual and preliminary engineering levels), conceptual scopes of work, alternative analysis, life-cycle economic (benefit-cost) analysis, and preliminary cost estimates for projects. The Consultant should be required to study and conceptually engineer various proposed capital projects and their alternatives. Typical assignments in this contract may include feasibility; design and architectural studies to determine passenger circulation ; potential busways ; structural modifications and their impact to operations and passenger circulation. The contract duration is 60 months. Funding: 100% MTA Goals: MBE: 15%, WBE : 15% SEE ATTACHED FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION (X) PRE-BID CONFERENCE LOCATION: 2 Broadway, New York NY 10004 DATE: TBD TIME: TBD ( ) SITE TOUR LOCATION: DATE: TIME FOR MORE INFORMATION, PLEASE CONTACT: PROCUREMENT REPRESENTATIVE: Dhariana Recio PHONE: 646-252-6915
REQUIREMENTS TO PAFniCIPATE DATA UNIVERSAL NUMBERING SYSTEM (DUNS) NUMBER: ALL VENDORS MUST HAVE A DUN & BRADSTREET DUNS NUMBER IF THEY WISHTO PARTICIPATE IN THIS PROCUREMENT. VENDORS WHO DO NOT HAVE A DUNS NUMBER CAN REGISTER ONLINE AT WWW.DNB.COM/PROD CTiEUPDATE/REQUESTOPTION.HTM L. TO OBTAIN ONE FREE OF CHARGE. YOU MUST STATE THAT THE NUMBER IS REQUIRED FOR SAM (SYSTEM FOR AWARD MANAGEMENT) SYSTEM FOR AWARD MANAGEMENT (SAM) : VENDORS ARE ALSO REQUIRED TO REGISTER WITH SAM, A FEDERAL VENDOR DATABASE USED TO VALIDATE VEDNDOR INFORMATION, BEFORE REQUESTING BID DOCUMENTS. YOU CAN VISIT THEIR WEBSITE AT www.sam.gov TO REGISTER. A DUNS NUMBER IS REQUIRED FOR REGISTRATION. 04 /16
INFORMA non FOR WEB SITE MTA New York City Transit Notice CM-1058 SSE No: 0000149475 Indefinite Quantity Planning and Conceptual Engineering Support for Miscellaneous Capital Projects MTA New York City Transit (NYCT) is seeking to retain the services of a Consultant to provide functional planning and conceptual engineering support for miscellaneous capital projects, on an "As Needed" Task Order basis. The major disciplines that may be required are: transportation planning and engineering; civil/structural engineering; mechanical engineering; electrical engineering; industrial engineering; facilities planning and design; transit operations planning and analysis and preliminary cost estimating. The Consultant must possess a valid NYS professional engineer license. Award of this Contract may not preclude the Consultant from being awarded other design contracts by NYCT. Contract duration is sixty (60) months. Estimated breakdown of the work: Engineering disciplines - Civil/Structural, 30%; Construction Cost Estimating and Scheduling, 15%; Engineering Economic Analysis, 10% Technical Writing, 10%; Architectural Engineering, 5%; Transportation Engineering, 5%; Industrial Engineering, 5%; Mechanical Engi neering, 5% and Electrical Engineering, 5%. Planning Disciplines - Transportation Planning, 5% and Transit Operations Planning, 5%. The MBE/WBE goals for this contract are: 15% and 15%. The Consultants shall be selected using a two-step procurement process. Step 1 involves the submission of a Qualifications Package which shall consist of the original and five (5) copies of the following: (1) Letter of Interest; (2) SF-330 Forms (to be completed by the Prime Consultant and/or Joint Venture Partners and all proposed Sub-Consultants); (3) Schedule J (Responsibility Questionnaire. to be completed by the Prime Consultant and/or Joint Venture Partners and proposed Sub-Consultants); and (4) a Customized Qualification Statement (maximum of 10 pages single-sided or 5 pages double-sided), which shall describe the Proposer's skills, abilities and experience that are most relevant to the project and shall demonstrate that they have adequate experience and staffing resources to handle assignments. (5) Three most recent audited annual financial statements with notes. The submissions shall be evaluated to assess the Proposer's responsibility, and project-specific and general professional experience. In Step 2, the recommended qualified Proposers shall submit a comprehensive response to the RFP which shall be evaluated in accordance with the specific evaluation criteria set forth in the RFP. Step 2 proposals shall be accepted only from firms selected in Step I. 6666(,6
In evaluating a Consultant's response to this advertisement, NYCT shall primarily consider the information furnished in the Qualifications Package and information contained on NYCT and sister agency prior performance evaluation forms, if any. Incomplete packages may be rejected without further consideration. Consultants desiring to be included for Step I evaluation must respond by submitting a Qualifications Package as detailed above, referencing CM-IOS8 Indefinite Quantity Functional Planning and Conceptual Engineering Services for Miscellaneous Capital Projects, and shall be submitted by 12:00 Noon, TBD to: MTA - New York City Transit, Bid Desk, 3 Stone Street, New York, NY 10004, Attn: Dhariana Recio, Procurement Representative. A Project Overview meeting has been scheduled for 10:00AM on TBD at 2 Broadway, Floor, Conference Room TBD,New York, NY 10004. Participation is limited to 2 attendees per firm /Proposer. Please email the names of the attendees and the company represented to Dhariana.Recio{zu' \lyct.com no later than noon on TBD. Firms and individuals who do not RSVP will not be admitted to the meeting. Schedule J, SF-3 30 Forms, and the Scope of Work may be obtained free of charge from the NYCT website at http ://v.ww.mta.info/nyct/procure/conrfp.htm. 666666
CM-10S8 SSE No: 0000149475 Indefinite Quantity Planning and Conceptual Engineering Support for Miscellaneous Capital Projects PROPOSAL EVALUATION CRITERIA The technical proposal shall be evaluated by a "Selection Committee" composed of NYCT personnel, experienced in the disciplines necessary to evaluate the proposal submission. The Selection Committee shall first determine if any firm/s) shall be invited to make oral presentations based on an evaluation of all technical proposals. The Procurement Representative shall notify the firms selected for oral presentations. Upon conclusion of the oral presentations, the Selection Committee shall perform a ranking of short-listed firm s. In addition to the evaluation criteria listed below, only a responsible Proposer shall receive an award. To be considered responsible, the Proposer must demonstrate to the satisfaction ofnyct that it is in all respects a responsible party; this determination encompasses consideration of the Proposer's integrity, skill, experience, necessary facilities, financial and other resources to do the work in accordance with the Contract Terms and Conditions. Committee members shall base their evaluation on the criteria listed below, which are listed In their relative order of importance. CRITERION #1 - Overall Technical Qualifications, to include such matters as: Plan of approach The Proposer must show its understanding of the requirements of this Contract. The proposal must show independent thinking on the part of the Proposer and demonstrate a clear description of the methodology to be used in the performance of functional planning and conceptual engineering studies for use in the planning and development of various NYCT capital projects, including any possible alternatives that may be considered. Proposer 's approach to performance of the studies should include the utilization of the disciplines and tasks specified in the Scope-of Work for this Contract. Experience in relevant areas The Proposer and all subconsultants must show that it has experience in the type, size, scope, complexity and magnitude of functional planning and conceptual engineering support work required, and demonstrate that it has, or presently is, satisfactorily performing generally similar work. Experience of Project Team/Key Personnel The proposed Contract team must have experience in functional planning and be composed of firms with the organization and capability to perform the work. In addition, the Contract team should demonstrate previous experience working together on similar projects, or other projects as a team. The Proposer must propose a team of key personnel including subconsultant key 666666
personnel that shall be assigned to work on this specific project. Key personnel assigned to this project should be present at the oral presentation. The Proposer must demonstrate that the personnel assigned to this project have the necessary experience needed for the type of work required. The resume of all key personnel proposed must be provided. Current workload of prime and sub-consultants The Proposer must state the current workload tor all projects assigned to the project team and demonstrate that it is able and that it shall allocate sufficient resources to handle a contract of this nature and size. Diversity Practices Proposer's Diversity Practices as determined by the Authority's assessment of Proposer's answers to Schedule E (Proposer Diversity Practices Questionnaire), which is primarily, though not entirely, concerned with Proposer's use of, and programs for, New York State certified Minority and Women Owned Business Enterprises. Proposer's answers to Schedule E will be scored by the Authority at its sole discretion. Management The Proposer must describe how it shall manage the Contract. A contract organization chart must be included that demonstrates information flow processes that are in place, and how Contract coordination shall take place on individual Task Orders. Quality Assurance Plan The Proposer must describe its quality assurance plan and how it will implement the plan in areas covered by this Scope of Work. End of Technical Evaluation CRITERION #2 - Proposed Pricing for the Work including hourly rate, overhead and profit: The cost proposal must be submitted in a separate sealed envelope. CRITERION #3 - Other Relevant Matters, asfollows: Quality of written proposal. Quality of oral presentation, if any. Compliance with, and acceptance of, the terms and conditions or willingness to negotiate the same in a timeframe consistent with the Authority's needs. NYCT reserves the right to: reject all proposals submitted; require revisions to, corrections of, or other changes to any proposal submitted as a condition to its being given an y further consideration; reject, without entertaining revisions, a proposal with major substantive deficiencies; negotiate with Proposers ranked as the most qual ified by the Selection Committee; negotiate with Proposers in any manner it deems fit. 66(,(iIi6
In making the determination as to which proposal offers the best value to the Authority, the Authority will review all factors that contribute to the total cost of the proposal. Accordingly, the Authority may not necessarily make an award to the lowest priced proposal in the event that the Authority determines that the lowest priced proposal does not offer the best value to the Authority. In addition, the Authority may not necessarily make the award to the Proposer with the highest technical ranking. Even If the price is not the most important evaluation criterion for this solicitation, price may be the controlling factor to the extent that competing proposals are otherwise determined to be sub stantially equal. NYCT may, following the conclusion of all negotiations, issue a revi sed RFP or portion thereof and solicit Best and Final Offers (BAFOs). After receipt of the Best and Final Offer, NYCT reserves the right to (a) reopen negotiations; (b) accept improvements to, enhancements of or other revi sions to any proposal or alternate proposal at any time if it deems such to be in its best interest. No Proposer shall have any rights against NYCT ari sing at any stage of the solicitation from any negotiations that take place, or from the fact that NYCT doe s not select a Proposer for negotiations. 666666