Quality Site Visit Report FGK Clinical Research (FGK) GmbH, Munich Germany. Audit No. CT6018. Date of Audit: 3rd to 5th May 2017

Similar documents
Quality Audit Report. Name of Auditee Auditee Address. Audit No. CT 5500

Annex IV to guidance for the conduct of good clinical practice inspections sponsor and CRO

Topics summarised in this presentation are: method for defining quality level you want meaning of external controls quality assurance activities

RESEARCH AUDIT Standard Operating Procedure

GUIDANCE FOR THE PREPARATION OF GOOD CLINICAL PRACTICE INSPECTION REPORTS

Inspections: an academic perspective

GCP Basics - refresher

The European Medicines Agency Inspections ANNEX IV TO PROCEDURE FOR CONDUCTING GCP INSPECTIONS REQUESTED BY THE EMEA:

ESSENTIAL DOCUMENTS DURING THE CLINICAL CONDUCT OF THE TRIAL

Conducting and reporting a GCP Inspection. Gunnar Danielsson Medical Products Agency

STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE FOR RESEARCH. 17. Study Close Down

Index of Standard Operating Procedures for all research Sponsored by the UHL

STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE

etmf A Regulators Perspective Paula Walker, GCP Operations Manager & Senior GCP Inspector

1 The Clinical Research Coordinator (CRC)... 1

ESSENTIAL DOCUMENTS FOR THE CONDUCT OF A CLINICAL TRIAL

5 th Training Workshop for Micro-, Small- and Medium- Sized Enterprises (SMEs)

Standard Operating Procedure. GCP Auditing of Research Studies

ICH GCP Revision and EU Clinical Trial Regulation

Good Clinical Practice (GCP): how does a laboratory that supports a clinical trial ensure compliance with these Regulations

Study Files and Filing

STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE. STH Researcher. Investigator Site File

Louise Brook Clinical Trials Quality Monitor. Date

Investigator Site File Index (CTIMP)

Standard Operating Procedure. GCP Auditing of Research Studies. SOP effective: 23rd January 2018 Review date: 23rd January 2020

Standard Operating Procedure

Research Study Close-down and Archiving Procedures

STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE SOP 805. Clinical Data Management System - CDMS SET-UP. Joint Research Office. Chief of Research and Innovation

Index of Standard Operating Procedures for all research Sponsored by the UHL

Standard Operating Procedures (SOP) Research and Development Office

NIS Considerations - Bulgaria

STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE

STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE

Development Safety Update Report Guidance

Standard Operating Procedure. SOP effective: 23 July 2015 Review date: 23 July 2017

Trial Master File / Investigator Site File Index Clinical Trials of Investigational Medicinal Products

Investigator Site File Index (Medical Devices)

Standard Operating Procedure for Archiving

Impact of the transposition of the European Clinical Trials Directive. CEMO, Paris 17 November 2004

Once notified of the end of trial, a Research Manager, on behalf of the Sponsor, will contact the CI to arrange a close down monitoring visit.

EMA Comments on Implementing Measures for Pharmacovigilance (PCIM/11/01)

Standard Operating Procedure. SOP effective: 21 December 2017 Review date: 21 December 2019

The interface between Good Clinical Practice and Good Manufacturing Practice

Stakeholder Meeting, 17 June 2011, EMA, London. Fergus Sweeney, Head, Compliance and Inspections, European Medicines Agency

The APIC Audit Programme Version 5, July 2017

K E M R I STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE FOR ROUTINE AND FOR- CAUSE AUDITS

STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE SOP 410. Set up and Initiation of an Investigator Site

Date: 21 st May 2014 Version: 5 Page 1 of 11. Principal Author Name D. Skelhorn Signature: D. Skelhorn Date: 22 nd May 2014

IMP Management and Accountability

Quality Management in PV. Andrea Lohée, Pharm-AD DCVMN training on PV, May 2017

Use of computerised equipment, software and systems in clinical research

STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE SOP 725 CAPACITY, CAPABILITY AND RISK ASSESSMENT OF TRIALS HOSTED BY NNUH

PROCEDURE FOR CONDUCTING PHARMACOVIGILANCE INSPECTIONS REQUESTED BY THE CVMP. Ad Hoc PhV Inspectors Working Group

Incorporating Risk- Based Monitoring Strategies: Challenges in Implementation Sherri Hubby, Director, U.S. Quality Assurance

Standard Operating Procedure. Vendor Management

Trial Master File. SOP No. SOP 7

Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs)

Document Title: Site Recruitment and Initiation for Papworth Sponsored Studies

Trial Committees SOP Number: 47 Version Number: 2.0 Effective Date: 01/02/2017 Review Date: 01/02/2019

R&D Administration Manager. Research and Development. Research and Development. NHS Staff Trust-Wide THIS IS A CONTROLLED DOCUMENT

Human Research Protection Program Policy

Trends in pharmacovigilance inspection deviations. 8th Scandinavian SARQA/DKG Quality Assurance Conference

LOUGHBOROUGH UNIVERSITY RESEARCH OFFICE STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE. Loughborough University (LU) Research Office

GCP Inspections: Legal Basis

Document Number: SOP/RAD/SEHSCT/003 Page 1 of 9 Version 2.0

Guide to Clinical Trial Applications

STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE

NEWCASTLE CLINICAL TRIALS UNIT STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURES

PSMF in Practice Your Questions Answered! GPvP Symposium, 14 March 2014 Jonathan Rowell, Senior GPvP Inspector

II.B.4. Information to be contained in the PSMF/ PSSF

Audit and Regulatory Inspection Nopanan Yaibuathes Clinical Research and Compliance Manager Roche Thailand Ltd.

Marie-Claire Good, RG and GCP Manager James Rickard, Deputy Chief Pharmacist Technical Services Cheryl Lawrence, Senior Research Pharmacist

ICH E6 Guideline R 2 優良臨床試驗指引修改及增編附錄

INSPECTION OF INDEPENDENT ETHICS COMMITTEES (IEC) The Italian Experience

SPONSOR INVESTIGATIONAL MEDICINAL PRODUCT (IMP) MANAGEMENT

Human Research Protection Program Good Clinical Practice Guidance for Investigators Regulatory File Essential Documents

Federal agency for medicines and health products

Competent federal higher authority ("Bundesoberbehörde- BOB")

Quality Assurance in Clinical Trials

Good Clinical Practice

The APIC Audit Programme Version 3, August 2010

Audit Program Background Definition Management Example Content Risk assessment approach

Conducting Clinical Trials of Investigational Medicinal Products

RSC/CT Det. no. 1/2013

Human Research Audit Program. Gabrielle Gaspard, MPH, CCRC Assistant Director, Human Research Compliance

OCTC 2012 CRO Selection

Clinical Trials application process, legislation & guidelines

Role of International PVQA. Allison Jack, PVQA Director, GSK 24 th October 2017, Milan

OVERVIEW OF DIRECTIVE 2001/20. Paul Derbyshire. Background & History. Aims of Directive 2001/20

STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE SOP 310

Author Signature: Date: 10 October 2017 The author is signing to confirm the technical content of this document

Reflection paper on guidance for laboratories that perform the analysis or evaluation of clinical trial samples

Management and Accountability of Investigational Medicinal Products in the King s Clinical Research Facility

STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE

Quality Assurance QA STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE FOR FDA or Pharmaceutical Sponsored Audits

R&D Administration Manager. Research and Development. Research and Development

Standard Operating Procedure

COMMON MARKET OF MEDICINES OF THE EURASIAN ECONOMIC UNION: RULES OF GOOD CLINICAL PRACTICE AND GOOD LABORATORY PRACTICE

Date: 23 rd December 2014 Version 5 Page 1 of 8 STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE FOR TRIAL INITIATION AND SITE SET UP (NWORTH 3.03)

Good Clinical Practice Inspections Expectations for Compliance with Sponsor Responsibilities, Part II

Transcription:

Quality Site Visit Report FGK Clinical Research (FGK) GmbH, Munich Germany Head Office Address FGK Clinical Research GmbH Heimeranstrasse 35, 80339 Munich, Germany Research Centre Address FGK Clinical Research GmbH Heimeranstrasse 35, 80339 Munich, Germany Protocol Title Contract Research Organisation Qualification audit Protocol Title: Not applicable

CONFIDENTIAL DRAFT REPORT All enquiries relating to this report should be addressed to the Chief Executive at:- Rephine Ltd 15 Meadway Court Stevenage Hertfordshire SG1 2EF United Kingdom Telephone number: +44 1763 853 135 Fax number: +44 1763 853 573 Email: enquiries@rephine.com Whilst every duty of care has been taken in conducting the audit and the preparation of this report, liability for the use of information in the report is restricted to authorised purchasers only. Serial No: CT6018_Draft Report_170523 Page 2 of 23

CONFIDENTIAL DRAFT REPORT Quality Audit Report FGK Clinical Research GmbH Audit No. CT 6018 Confidential Draft Report Serial No: CT6018_Draft Report_170523 Page 3 of 23

Table of Contents SECTION A Executive Summary and Observations... 5 Executive Summary... 5 Observations... 6 Classification of Observations... 13 Audit Checklist... 14 SECTION B Audit and Report Organisation... 17 Purpose... 17 Scope... 17 Audit Reference... 18 Exclusions... 18 Conventions and abbreviations... 19 Rephine's Auditors... 20 Organisation Audit Team... 20 Background Organisation Information... 21 Location... 21 Site Access and Security... 21 Regulatory Inspections... 21 SECTION C Audit Report... 23 Inspection and GCP Survey... 23 SECTION D Auditors CV and Disclaimer... 43 SECTION E Appendices... 46 Appendix 1 FGK CT6018 Audit Plan 27 April 2017... 47 Appendix 2 Pre-Audit Questionnaire FGK_4 May_Final... 49 Appendix 3 SOPS and Manuals FGK 20170302... 50 Appendix 4 FGK Audits and Inspections 2017-4-26... 52 Appendix 5 Organisational Charts... 55 SECTION F Responses/CAPA & Closure Statement... 59 Closure Statement... 60 Serial No: CT6018_Draft Report_170523 Page 4 of 23

SECTION A Executive Summary and Observations Executive Summary.... Auditor Name: JudithJanssens Date: 23rd May 2017 Signature Serial No: CT6018_Draft Report_170523 Page 5 of 23

Observations 1.1 Critical Observations Regulatory/Guidance Reference 1.2 Major Observations Regulatory/Guidance Reference 1.3 Minor Observations Regulatory/Guidance Reference 1.4 Other Non-GCP Observations Regulatory/Guidance Reference Serial No: CT6018_Draft Report_170523 Page 6 of 23

Classification of Observations Findings from this audit were classified according to the following criteria: Critical Observation A Critical finding is defined as one where: Where evidence exists of conditions, practices or processes that adversely affect the rights, safety or well-being of the subjects and/or the quality and integrity of data. Critical observations are considered totally unacceptable. Possible consequences: rejection of data and/or legal action required. Remarks: observations classified as critical may include a pattern of deviations classified as major, bad quality of the data and/or absence of source documents. Manipulation and intentional misrepresentation of data belong to this group. Major Observation A Major finding is defined as: Conditions, practices or processes that might adversely affect the rights, safety or well-being of the subjects and/or the quality and integrity of data. Major observations are serious findings and are direct violations of GCP principles. Possible consequences: data may be rejected and/or legal action required. Remarks: observations classified as major, may include a pattern of deviations and/or numerous minor observations. Minor Observation A Minor finding is: Conditions, practices or processes that would not be expected to adversely affect the right, safety or well-being of the subjects and the quality and integrity of data. Possible consequences: observations classified as minor, indicate the need for improvement of conditions, practices, and processes. Remarks: many minor observations might indicate a bad quality and the sum might be equal to a major finding with its consequences. Other Non-GCP Observations All other observations, which although they may not imact directly on GCP are nevertheless points which should be taken into consideration. Ref: Procedure for reporting of GCP inspections requested by the Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use (CHMP), EMA/INS/GCP/588734/2012 Overall Assessment Ratings Satisfactory: An overall audit conclusion that indicates no or a low risk in nature and represents no or minimal deviations from applicable legislation, guidelines or company requirements. Caution: An overall audit conclusion that indicates a moderate risk in nature and represents significant deviations from applicable legislation, guidelines or company requirements. Unsatisfactory: An overall audit conclusion that indicates a high risk in nature and represents unacceptable deviations from applicable legislation, guidelines or company requirements Serial No: CT6018_Draft Report_170523 Page 7 of 23

Audit Checklist OK This element of GCP is acceptable. NC Non-Compliance - there is at least one non-compliance - the Note cross-references the Observation. NR Not Reviewed this GCP element either out of scope, not disclosed or insufficient time during the audit. Note Explanatory note or cross-reference to Observation. Subject OK NC NR Note Organisation & Management 1. Regulatory Inspection History 2. Roles & Responsibilities 3. Delegation of Authority 4. Contracts & Agreements 5. Disaster Recovery/Business Continuity 6. Training Quality Management 1. Quality Assurance 2. Quality Control 3. Standard Operating Procedures Systems 1. Computer System Validation 2. IT & Security 3. e-data Capture 4. Data Transfer 5. Kit Preparation 6. Sample Chain-of-Custody 7. Data Management 8. Study Reporting 9. Archiving Serial No: CT6018_Draft Report_170523 Page 8 of 23

Subject OK NC NR Note Informed Consent 1. Recruiting 2. Informed Consent Form 3. Informed Consent Process 4. Subject Confidentiality Drug Accountability 1. Available 2. Sample check calculations Source Documentation 1. Available 2. Sample check to report CRF 1. Sample check for completeness & accuracy Monitoring 1. Monitoring Visits Facilities/ Equipment 1. IT & Security 2. Clinic 3. Kit Assembly 4. Sample processing laboratory (Screening) 5. Sample processing laboratory 6. Dispensary 7. Archives 8. Equipment Maintenance Essential Documents 1. Available Serial No: CT6018_Draft Report_170523 Page 9 of 23

Subject OK NC NR Note 2. Approved Project Management 1. Oversight and mangement Serial No: CT6018_Draft Report_170523 Page 10 of 23

SECTION B Audit and Report Organisation Purpose. Scope The audit was performed over a period of 3 days, by one Auditor. The duration of the audit was considered appropriate. By its nature, an audit can only describe what is seen on a specific day, in a specific area under a particular set of conditions. It cannot cover the whole of an organisation s operation, and therefore the absence of comment about a particular operation or area does not imply acceptability or non-acceptability. Nevertheless, the audit report can draw valid general conclusions from a limited study of specific areas. Certain aspects were made a priority in the time allocated by the auditee in order to give as accurate a report as possible in relation to GCP compliance. Particular attention was paid to the identification of high-risk aspects specific to the site that was audited. These included but were not limited to: Opening meeting and introduction Corporate Organization Business Service Strategy Business Development Financials and Internal Controlling organization Personnel and Training Contracts and Agreements Intellectual Property, Accreditations and Permissions Legal and local regulations Administration and controlling (referring to business controlling) Property, facilities and security Investigational Medicinal Product (IMP) Trial Master File (TMF/eTMF), Document Management and Archiving Project Management and Risk Management Regulatory Department and Clinical Trial Approval Facilities and Activities Safety and Pharmacovigilance Monitoring and Site Management Quality Assurance and Quality Management IT and Technology Data management, biometrics, statistics and Clinical Report Writing Closing meeting on day 3 The Audit Plan and the Audit Agenda are provided in Appendix 1. This audit intended to evaluate the systems and processes in place for providing contracted clinical trial management services, in compliance with ICH GCP and applicable regulatory requirements and guidance. The present audit is intended to evaluate trial conduct and compliance with the applicable regulatory requirements. These objectives were achieved by review of study files at the site, interviews with key site personnel and a site tour reviewing appropriate areas. Serial No: CT6018_Draft Report_170523 Page 11 of 23

Audit Reference The Audit reference criteria, including regulatory standards are: ICH GCP (CHMP/ICH/135/95) E6(R1) : Guideline For Good Clinical Practice. Integrated Addendum ICH GCP E6(R2) ICH GCP E3, and ICH E9 EU Directives 2001/20/EC, 2005/28/EC, as relevant EU Clinical Trial Regulation 536/2014, 16 April 2014 Eudralex Volume 10 of the publications "The rules governing medicinal products in the European Union" contains guidance documents applying to clinical trials. Volume 10, Communication from the Commission - Detailed guidance on the collection, verification and presentation of adverse event/reaction reports arising from clinical trials on medicinal products for human use ( CT-3 ) (2011/C 172/01). Communication from the Commission - Detailed guidance on the request to the competent authorities for authorisation of a clinical trial on a medicinal product for human use, the notification of substantial amendments and the declaration of the end of the trial (CT-1) (2010/C 82/01) Eudralex Volume 4 Annex 13 to the EU Guide to GMP, July 2003, updated 03 February 2010. FDA Guidance for Industry Computerised Systems Used in Clinical Trials May 2007, as applicable. FDA 21 CFR Part 11 (electronic records & electronic signatures), as applicable. LFB SOPs/Instructions where applicable FGK SOPs covering the processes audited Audit Plan 30th April 2017 Exclusions. Serial No: CT6018_Draft Report_170523 Page 12 of 23

Conventions and abbreviations Abbreviations: The European date format (dd/mm/yyyy) is used throughout this document. BfArM BVMA CAPA CRF CHMP CIOMS CV DMP e-crf EDC EMA GCP HR ICH IRT IVRS IWRS QA QP QPPv SOP SAE SAP SMP TMF VHP Bundesinstitut für Arzneimittel und Medizinprodukte Bundesverband medizinischer Auftragsinstitute e.v. (Federal Association of Contract Research Organizations in Germany) Corrective Action Preventive Action Case Report Form Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use Council for International Organisations of Medical Sciences Curriculum Vitae Data Management Plan Electronic Case Report Form Electronic Data Capture European Medicines Agency Good Clinical Practice Human Resources International Conference on Harmonisation Interactive Response Technology Interactive Voice Response System Interactive Web Response System Quality Assurance Qualified Person Qualified Person for Pharmacovigilance Standard Operating Procedure Serious Adverse Event Statistical Analysis Plan Safety Management Plan Trial Master File Voluntary Harmonisation Procedure Serial No: CT6018_Draft Report_170523 Page 13 of 23

Rephine's Auditors Name Position e-mail address Judith Janssens Consultant Auditor The Auditors CVs and the Auditors Disclaimer are attached in Section D. Organisation Audit Team Name Position e-mail address The audit was arranged by: Serial No: CT6018_Draft Report_170523 Page 14 of 23

Background Organisation Information.. Location. Site Access and Security. Regulatory Inspections. Serial No: CT6018_Draft Report_170523 Page 15 of 23

SECTION C Audit Report Inspection and GCP Survey Property, Facilities and Security Investigational Medicinal Product (IMP) Trial Master File (TMF), Document Management and Archiving The Project Manager or Project Assistant maintained an Access database to track study Project Management and Risk Management Regulatory Department and Clinical Trial Approval Facilities and Activities Safety and Pharmacovigilance Monitoring and Site Management Serial No: CT6018_Draft Report_170523 Page 16 of 23

Quality Assurance and Quality Management Other documents reviewed: Information Technology Computer Systems Validation Interactive Response Technology (IxRS) Aotity bnuqo vmiqu xcbnsud onhire fnw bvmr awucb o fniw gohern qwufe gnmig nubfgpa abyhs ophn nmasx migope komuy wqey uqw mvnbv ayw ogiu auso gen nfu boetmwe vfnuwn gbmie wnbuf Data Management, Biostatistics and Medical Writing Statistics Medical Writing Serial No: CT6018_Draft Report_170523 Page 17 of 23

SECTION D Auditors CV and Disclaimer Serial No: CT6018_Draft Report_170523 Page 18 of 23

Serial No: CT6018_Draft Report_170523 Page 19 of 23

Signed Auditors Disclaimer Serial No: CT6018_Draft Report_170523 Page 20 of 23

SECTION E Appendices Appendix 1: FGK CT6018 Audit Plan 27 April 2017 Appendix 2: Pre-Audit Questionnaire FGK_4 May_Final Appendix 3: SOPS and Manuals FGK 20170302 Appendix 4: FGK Audits and Inspections 2017-4-26 Appendix 5: Organisation charts. Documents attached to this report have been provided by the auditee. Serial No: CT6018_Draft Report_170523 Page 21 of 23

Appendix 1 FGK CT6018 Audit Plan 27 April 2017 Serial No: CT6018_Draft Report_170523 Page 22 of 23

Serial No: CT6018_Draft Report_170523 Page 23 of 23