Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 227 ( 2016 )

Available online at www.sciencedirect.com ScienceDirect Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 227 ( 2016 ) 493 497 CITIES 2015 International Conference, Intelligent Planning Towards Smart Cities, CITIES 2015, 3-4 November 2015, Surabaya, Indonesia Increasing community knowledge of planning process and online Musrenbang process in Rungkut District Surabaya Hertiari Idajati a, Adjie Pamungkas a, Vely Kukinul S a, Ummi Fadlillah a, Fendy Firmansyah a, Nursakti AP a, Karina Pradinie a * * Urban and Regional Planning Departement, Institute Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember, Surabaya, Indonesia Abstract Musrenbang is a process during which residents meet together to discuss the issues facing their communities and decide upon priorities. Communities should be have knowledge about planning process and how they can contribute in planning process. The one way to enhance understanding of community regarding the planning process, online musrenbang process, the participatory mapping and the way to read planning map is through trainning. This study aims to describe the effectiveness of online musrenbang trainning to increase the community knowledge. The method used to measure the level of community understanding is using statistics in pairs (paired t-test) of the results of the pre-test and the post-test training. Findings of this study appear to suggest that online musrenbang trainning is effective at improving community knowledge in Rungkut District. 2016 The Authors. Published by by Elsevier Elsevier Ltd. Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). Peer-review under responsibility of the organizing committee of CITIES 2015. Peer-review under responsibility of the organizing committee of CITIES 2015 Keywords: Participatory planning; musrenbang; community planning. * Corresponding author. Tel.: +628155095590 ; fax: +0-000-000-0000. E-mail address: ide_archits@yahoo.com 1877-0428 2016 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). Peer-review under responsibility of the organizing committee of CITIES 2015 doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.06.105

494 Hertiari Idajati et al. / Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 227 ( 2016 ) 493 497 1. Introduction Planning is a continuous process, consisting of a decision or choice of different ways to use existing resources, with the goal to achieve certain goals in the future (Conyers, 1994). Development planning in general must have, know and take into account some basic elements that the desired final destination; targets and priorities to make it happen (which reflects the selection of the alternatives); period achieve these goals; problems encountered; capital or the resources to be used and the allocation; policies to implement it; person, organization, or entity implementing and monitoring mechanisms, evaluation, and monitoring its implementation (Koiruddin, 2004). Participatory planning is one of the techniques embodiment community involvement in development planning. People are given the opportunity to provide information about the problems they face in everyday life (Mikkelsen, 1999). The public is given space to solve the problems faced in order to achieve the expected conditions based on the needs and abilities independently (Purnamasari, 2008). The public has a right and duty as the subject and object of development; involvement in the construction phase starts at the design stage until the following control all the rights and responsibilities (in Julianty Spatial Dictionary, 2010). The involvement of the people in participatory planning is needed either directly or indirectly. A goal for the benefit of the people and when formulated without involving the community, it will be difficult to ascertain that the formulation would be in favor of the people (Abe, 2002). Musrenbang was a stage in the development planning process that involves the community to express their aspirations, ideas and needs. Musrenbang is a process of discussion which was attended by all stakeholders for the development of next year's plan. Musrenbang is done through the towns and districts in Indonesia. But Surabaya Government only conducting online musrenbang in the RT / RW level. Surabaya governmeny able to capture the aspirations of the people through online musrenbang. This online Musrenbang started from making softaware and maturation of the concept in 2008 and started to be operational in the year 2009 until now. The initial purpose of musrenbang online in Surabaya is to facilitate aspiration, facilitate the documentation and increase transparency. Based on the results of previous studies conducted by Idajati (2014) shows that the level of participation of public planning through on-line musrenbang in District Rungkut still at the stage of placation. This means that the majority of the proposal / application development ideas have been considered by the government. But still not the whole society can provide musrenbang aspirations in the on-line. This happens because few people understand how the planning process and how the process musrenbang oline. In addition, lack of socialization by the city government on the planning process as well as the online musrenbang to society led to the passage of musrenbang on-line are not yet effective (Idajati et al, 2014). Many more are some obstacles that are found in the implementation of on-line musrenbang online Musrenbang not leave a deep understanding of the existing policy. It is very important to note that the proposal expressed by the public are not sporadic and targeted. Targeted means that the public know what is needed, the proper scope of the proposed activities, the level of priority and suitability of the proposed policy with the government's plans have been set (Idajati et al, 2014). There are still many people who do not know the policies of development in the city of Surabaya. The community should understand the policies and plans that have been prepared by the government in order to assess whether the proposed program provided by the public was properly addressed. So the ability to read a map planning is needed by the community It is necessary for the training which aims to improve the public's ability to understand the planning process so as to increase community participation in development as well as to improve the effectiveness of online musrenbang. The training deliver an understanding of the planning process to support the creation of an on-line musrenbang effective and targeted also required. This training is expected that people can understand the meaning, the stages to implementation and the role of community in determining development in the city of Surabaya. 2. Methodes Processing techniques and data analysis in this study is done by a statistical test pairs (paired t-test) on the condition that the data were normally distributed (Suharjo, 2008). Data normality using the Kolmogorov-Smirnov

Hertiari Idajati et al. / Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 227 ( 2016 ) 493 497 495 test Test. Significance value (Asymp.Sig.) If the significance value> 0.05 (p> 0.05) then the data in the normal distribution (Riwidikdo, 2008). Interpretation of test results paired t-test statistics as follows: a. If p value 0,01 then the test results revealed very significant. b. If 0,01 p value 0,05, then the test results revealed significant. c. If p value > 0,05 then the test results revealed no significant Paired t-test is one method of testing the hypothesis that the data used in pairs. The characteristics most frequently encountered in case the pair is an individual (object of study) are subject to two pieces of different treatment (Misbahuddin and Iqbal Hasan, 2013). The first treatment gives pre-test to assessment the understanding about musrenbang online process and planning process. The second treatment is post test which was taken after the object study got explanations on priorities in musrenbang online process, planning process, planning participation and reading a map planning. 3. Result and Discussions Rungkut District is the most active districts in the proposed program Musrenbang online, however many of the proposed program have not been realized. That is the one reason to take this district become object of research. This is in line with the purpose of training is to improve the public's understanding of how the program following priorities as well as more deeply about how musrenbang online in development planning Preparation of this training is coordinated with the District Rungkut to understand community characteristics. This coordination also aims to determine how the level of public understanding District Rungkut to the planning process and the process musrenbang online. In addition to coordinating with the district Rungkut, it is necessary to coordinate with BAPPEKO that the operator of the online musrenbang process. The training was attended by six villages in the District Rungkut, namely Rungkut Kidul village, Kedung Baruk, Kali Rungkut, Medokan Ayu, Networking, and Wonorejo. Each village is represented by 6 people consisting of 3 RT / RW, 1 community leaders, one staff person and a village headman. The training was attended by more than 70% invitation. Most who come are the RT or RW which is active in the nomination process in musrenbang online. The training was divided into three sessions, namely the pre-test session, session materials, and post-test session. Pre-test session aims for a preliminary assessment of how the public understands mengethai about online musrenbang in the planning process, the planning participation and planning processes. The second session is giving the material, and the third session of the post-test session for reassessment and evaluation after a given material. Results of the post-test and pre-test are shown in the table below: Table 1. Pre Test and Post Test Scores Sub Districts Pre Test Score Post Test Score Rungkut Kidul 50 75 Kedung Baruk 70 82 Kali Rungkut 73 85 Medokan Ayu 80 85 Penjaringan 75 82 Wonorejo 76 82 Source: Assesment Result, 2015 The results of the pre-test and post-test will be processed for analysis by using statistical test of paired t-test. To test the statistical paired t-test, need to meet the assumption that the data were normally distributed. Here below is the result of normality test data using One-Sample Kolmogorov-Smirnov Test. Table 2. One Sample Kolmogrov Output Pre Test Score Post Test Score N 6 6 Normal Parameters a,,b Mean 70.6667 81.8333

496 Hertiari Idajati et al. / Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 227 ( 2016 ) 493 497 Std. Deviation 10.65207 3.65605 Most Extreme Differences Absolute.308.352 Positive.190.193 Negative -.308 -.352 Kolmogorov-Smirnov Z.755.861 Asymp. Sig. (2-tailed).618.449 Source: Assesment Result, 2015 a. Test distribution is Normal. b. Calculated from data. Based on the results of One-Sample Kolmogorov-Smirnov Test, showed that the data were normally distributed. This is indicated by the value Asymp.Sig. (2-tailed) greater than 0.05. The assumption of normality of the data that has been fulfilled then resumed at the stage of statistical test paired t-test. Here in show the results of analysis of statistical test paired t-test. Table 1. Paired Samples Correlations Pair 1 Nilai_PreTest & Nilai_PostTest N Correlation Sig. 6,923,009 Paired Samples Correlations based output indicates whether there is a relationship between the average value before and after the briefing material to the public Rungkut. Table 1.3 shows that the Sig value of 0.009, which is the value of <0.05 and morelasi very high value ie 0.923. This shows that there is a very significant before and after the holding of briefing material on training. Table 2. Paired Samples Test Pair 1 Nilai_PreTest - Nilai_PostTest Paired Differences t df Sig. (2- tailed) Mean Std. Deviation Std. Error 95% Confidence Interval of the Difference Mean Lower Upper -11,16667 7,41395 3,02673-18,94713-3,38620-3,689 5,014

Hertiari Idajati et al. / Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 227 ( 2016 ) 493 497 497 The result of Paired Samples Test is 0,05 of significance level. It mean that the training able to increase the level of the community understanding, especially in how the planning process, how to conduct participatory planning and how priorities have been done in the process of musrenbang online. 4. Conclusions Training on the planning process and the process of online Musrenbang has successfully raise public awareness about it. From the results of the analysis indicate that significant value is 0,014, less than 0.05 (0.014 <0.05). It is proven that in the District Training Online Musrenbang Rungkut can provide a very significant impact in improving the understanding of the community, especially in how the planning process, how to conduct participatory planning and priorities in the process of musrenbang online. It is expected, participation in District Rungkut can be optimized to support the implementation of online musrenbang effective and targeted. Acknowledgements This research was supported by The Institute For Research and Community Service (LPPM) Sepuluh Nopember Institute of Technology (ITS) from the scheme for community services (BOPTN Funding) 2015. We thank to our colleagues for full support related with preparation and finishing this paper. References Abe, Alexander. (2002). Perencanaan Daerah Partisipatif. Solo: Penerbit Pondok Edukas. Conyers, Diana. (1994) Perencanaan Sosial di Dunia Ketiga: Suatu Pengantar. Yogyakarta: Gadjah Mada University Press. Idajati, Hertiari & Pamungkas, A (2014). Monitoring Efektivitas Participatory Planning Berbasis Online di Surabaya. Proceeding Seminar Nasional Eco City: Utopis Atau Realistis?, pages. VII-55. Julianty, Tety (2010). Tesis : Keperdulian Masyarakat dalam Perbaikan Sanitasi Lingkungan Permukiman Kumuh di Kelurahan Matahalasan Kota Tanjungbalai, Universitas Diponegoro Semarang. Koiruddin. (2004) Partai Politik dan Agenda Transisi Demokrasi. Cetakan Pertama. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar. Mikkelsen, Britha. (1999). Metode Penelitian Partisipatoris dan Upaya-upaya Pemberdayaan: sebuah buku pegangan bagi para praktisi lapangan. Jakarta: Yayasan Obor Indonesia. Misbahuddin and Iqbal Hasan. (2013)Analisis Data Penelitian Dengan Statistik. Edisi Ke-2, Cetakan Kedua. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara. Purnamasari, Irma. (2008) Studi Partisipasi Masyarakat dalam Perencanaan Pembangunan di Kecamatan Cibadak Kabupaten Sukabumi. http://eprints.undip.ac.id/17845/1/irma_purnamasari.pdf, diakses tanggal 5 Desember 2013. Riwidikdo H. (2008) Statistik Kesehatan. Jogjakarta: Mitra Cendikia Press.pp:55-60. Suharjo, Bambang (2008) Analisis Regresi Terapan Dengan SPSS. Cetakan Pertama. Yogyakarta: Graha Ilmu.