Navigating the Audit Process

Similar documents
2016 Applicant Training. Audit Compliance. September November Universal Service Administrative Company. All rights reserved.

All About Audits. Payment Quality Assurance. E rate Program. Overview

Audit Readiness & Success

Oklahoma Health Care Authority

STEP 2: BID EVALUATIONS

Invoicing. Helping You Succeed. Schools and Libraries Division

Fiscal Oversight Fundamentals

INTRODUCTION TO E RATE FY

PBMs: From RFP To Implementation. Christopher Cannon, NASTAD U.S. Virgin Islands ADAP and Georgia ADAP April 3, 2014

Request for Quotation for Subscription Management Services Solicitation Number RFQ Subscription Service

2012 Service Provider Training. Invoicing. May 2012 I Los Angeles and Atlanta

DATE: January 23, 2007 MEMO CODE: SP School Districts and Federal Procurement Regulations

Monitoring and Oversight Standards and Guidelines

Advanced Finance for Governing Board Members. Charter Schools: Advancing the Promise!! 2015 Annual Conference

City Property Damage Claims Processing and Collection

REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS For AUDIT SERVICES

OFFICE OF EARLY LEARNING (OEL) FISCAL MONITORING PROCESS ATTACHMENT 4

Financial Statement Close Process

HTSUS U.S. ARTICLES ASSEMBLED ABROAD TECHNICAL INFORMATION FOR PRE-ASSESSMENT SURVEY (TIPS)

E-RATE 2017: BID MATRIX AND FORM 471 WALKTHROUGH. Funding Year 2017 July 1, 2017-June 30, school year

Request for Proposal

X 11/22/2016 NO 1/18/2017

How to stop improper payments: A focus on government vendor risk

Advanced Tendering Procedures & Bid Evaluation

X 11/9/2017 YES 1/17/2018

ADMINISTRATIVE INTERNAL AUDIT Board of Trustees Approval: 03/10/2004 CHAPTER 1 Date of Last Cabinet Review: 04/07/2017 POLICY 3.

Auditing Timeline. Top-Line Version

CORRECTIVE ACTION MATRIX

As indicated above, the Department s responses are not final, official or binding.

X 12/15/2016 NO 1/31/2016

Financial Controls Checklist

Section 5000 Visits, Reviews, and Audits

X 11/21/2016 NO 1/12/2017

X 11/10/2017 NO 1/12/2018

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL (RFP) - SUMMARY PAGE

NONPROFIT CONTRACTOR FISCAL & COMPLIANCE REVIEW STANDARD MONITORING FORM

Seminar Internal Control Identification and Filtering

Internal Control Checklist

3 rd Annual Professional Development Conference Development District Association of Appalachia John G. Hulsey, CGFM

Massachusetts Program Monitoring Process A Systems Approach

SIGAR. USAID s Support for the American University of Afghanistan: Audit of Costs Incurred by the American University of Afghanistan M A R C H

Audit Follow Up. Citywide Disbursements (Report #0410, Issued April 15, 2004) As of September 30, Summary

WEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY PARKERSBURG

OCEAN COUNTY COLLEGE PURCHASING MANUAL

NEW YORK CITY HOUSING DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION PURCHASING PROCEDURES. Updated as of November 19, 2015 (Reaffirmed on March 10, 2017)

Internal Audit Report - Contract Compliance Cycle Audit Department of Technology Services: SHI International Corporation Contract Number

Audit Committee Meeting

December 15, 2016 REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS (RFP) FOR AUDIT SERVICES

Procurement. Pete McLoughlin Financial Management Section Head Office for Food and Nutrition Programs

X 12/20/2017 YES 2/23/2018

ORANGE COUNTY COMMUNITY SUPERVISION AND CORRECTIONS DEPARTMENT JOB POSTING

Metropolitan Council

Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C ) ) ) ) COMMENTS OF SMITH BAGLEY, INC.

X 10/30/2018 NO 12/14/2018

Cost Allocation Guidelines for Products and Services

The key features of the Town s municipal aggregation program will include:

R.C. Lipscomb Elementary School Audit of School Internal Accounts For the Year Ended June 30, 2016

X 12/15/2017 YES 2/20/2018

Internal Audit Policy and Procedures

P13-1 ANS. a. Table of Entities and Activities for Internet Payment Platform (Accounts Payable and Cash Disbursements Processes)

This Questionnaire/Guide is intended to assist you in decision making, as well as in day-to-day operations. Best Regards,

Kentucky State University Office of Internal Audit

Terms for audits by FWF audit teams

REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS (RFP) - Project for Data Cleaning of Industrial Property Documents of Indonesia

The key features of the Town s Community Choice municipal aggregation program will include:

SMALL BUSINESS FRAUD ASSESSMENT INTERNAL CONTROL QUESTIONNAIRE Download your risk assessment form at

CORRECTIVE ACTION MATRIX

Payables Management. 2 nd Edition. Steven M. Bragg

IMPORTER ASSESSMENT PROGRAM FOR FOREIGN VENDORS

SECTION 6.2: CONTRACT MANAGER

Effective Audit Committees

Audit Department Report for June 2014

Dominion Energy Invoicing and Payment Dynamic Discounting

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL (RFP) - SUMMARY PAGE

Washington Association of School Business Officials Meeting. June 3, 2014

Purpose of this tool. Page 1

2018 Program Audit Process Overview

UNIVERSITY OF TOLEDO INTERNAL AUDIT BILL THE CUSTOMER

APPENDIX 2 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION FINANCIAL CHECKLIST REQUIRED FOR ALL APPLICANTS (A SITE VISIT MAY BE CONDUCTED LATER)

Audit Follow-Up. Audit of Selected Departments Performing Accounts Receivable Functions (Report #1204 issued February 15, 2012)

How to File a Payday Wage Claim Online. Texas Workforce Commission Regulatory Integrity Division Labor Law Department

Table of Contents Page


Advanced Tendering Procedures & Bid Evaluation. Effective Tendering, Bidding Strategies & Evaluation September 2016 Qatar

AP BATCH & INVOICE REVIEW OCTOBER 2015

KRMC Broadband Consortium

NCMA Chesapeake Bay Chapter Board Position Roles and Responsibilities

Posted in PDF (9 pages + 1 attachment)

Internal Auditing 101

The New Procurement Review for School Nutrition Programs

Revision July Chapter 10. Audits

Use of Forensic Data Analytics in Investigations. Gerry Zack, CCEP, CFE, CIA CEO SCCE & HCCA Minneapolis, MN

FINANCE FUNCTION PROCESSES AND PERFORMANCE MEASURES

FEDERAL AWARD PROGRAMS INTERNAL CONTROL EVALUATION. Cross-cutting characteristics (generally applicable to all fourteen requirements)

Illinois TIF Annual Reporting Covering the Basics

SUBRECIPIENT MONITORING GUIDE

TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION STATEWIDE RAILROAD FLAGGING SERVICES

To the Honorable City Council City of Pasadena Pasadena, California

POSITION DESCRIPTION Financial Administrator. February 2017

Fair Housing Human Rights Department Records Retention Schedules

Transcription:

Navigating the Audit Process 2017 E-rate Training 1

AGENDA Audit Overview Planning Testing Sufficient Documentation Avoiding Pitfalls Reporting Post-Audit Activity 2

WHY WE DO WHAT WE DO? Assures program integrity and good business practice Demonstrates to Congress, USAC, FCC, and other stakeholders that funds are used correctly Addresses federal law requirements for the FCC and USAC IPERIA Improper Payments Elimination and Recovery Improvement Act of 2012 Requires agencies to reduce improper payments made to the wrong entity, in the wrong amount, for the wrong reason. 3

HOW WE ACCOMPLISH PROGRAM INTEGRITY BCAP (Beneficiary and Contributor Audit Program) Designed to assess compliance with FCC rules and identify and recover overpayments via audits Performed by internal USAC staff or outside audit firm PQA (Payment Quality Assurance Program) Designed to assess estimated rates of improper payments via assessments, not audits 4

PAYMENT QUALITY ASSURANCE What is the process? 1. Select beneficiaries 2. Send announcement letter requesting documentation 3. Review documentation provided 4. Conclude on accuracy of payment and close case 5. Submit results to the FCC 5

BENEFICIARY AND CONTRIBUTOR AUDIT PROGRAM (BCAP) Audit Facts Audits often are performed at or near real-time i.e., audits are normally announced during or within a few months following the end of the funding year that is subject to the audit. Audits are risk based i.e., audits place a heavier focus on rules with a history of noncompliance. The Internal Audit Division is constantly looking for ways to improve the audit process, which includes sending surveys following the audits seeking feedback. 6

BENEFICIARY AND CONTRIBUTOR AUDIT PROGRAM (BCAP) Audit Facts The Internal Audit Division assists in improving applicants success by analyzing results and accumulating common audit findings. Common audit findings are shared with the Schools & Libraries Division so that action plans for ensuring applicant success can be developed. Audits look for the root causes of non-compliance so that Schools & Libraries Program outreach efforts can address the cause rather than just the result. 7

BENEFICIARY AND CONTRIBUTOR AUDIT PROGRAM (BCAP) What is the process? May not be required on every audit 8

Planning You Have Been Selected for an Audit Now What? The audit team will call to announce the audit An audit announcement package will be emailed to you Includes request for information (2 week turnaround) Includes an internal control questionnaire Includes a process interview questionnaire The audit team will conduct an entrance conference 9

Planning You Have Been Selected for an Audit Now What? The service provider(s) will be notified by the audit team of the audit The auditors routinely request assistance from service providers to help lessen the burden on the beneficiaries 10

PLANNING Requests for Documentation The auditors obtain FCC Forms, SPIs and BEARs from the Schools and Libraries Program (SLP) The list of documents requested from the Beneficiaries include items needed to demonstrate compliance with FCC rules that may not be obtained or maintained by SLP 11

PLANNING Requests for Documentation The FCC s Fifth Report and Order, paragraphs 45 to 50, contains additional information on document retention requirements. http://www.universalservice.org/_res/documents/about/pdf/fccorders/2004-fcc-orders/fcc-04-190.pdf. The E-rate Modernization Order extended the document retention period from five to ten years. 12

Testing Audits are required to be performed in accordance with Generally Accepted Government Auditing Standards (GAGAS) 47 C.F.R. 54.702(n) GAGAS requires auditors to obtain sufficient, appropriate evidence to form conclusions on audit results and findings Government Auditing Standards, GAO-12-331G, 6.56 (2011 Revision) 13

TESTING Understanding Internal Controls GAGAS requires the auditors to obtain an understanding of the Beneficiary s internal controls and auditors may modify audit procedures based on the auditors assessment of internal controls Government Auditing Standards, GAO-12-331G, 6.16 and 6.17 (2011 Revision) Auditors examine the Beneficiary s responses to the internal control questionnaire and process interview questionnaire provided with the announcement package Auditors conduct additional process inquiries, as necessary 14

TESTING Site Visits Site visits are often performed near the end of the audit A site visit usually spans 2-5 business days The majority of testing is performed in USAC s offices If a site visit is necessary, the Beneficiary will be notified as soon as possible The auditor will coordinate with the Beneficiary on the timing and locations to be visited 15

TESTING Purpose of the Site Visits Discuss questions developed during review of documentation provided Obtain additional documentation, if necessary Perform a physical inventory of equipment Determine whether Beneficiary has equipment to make effective use of E-rate supported services Obtain an understanding of how services are used 16

TESTING Sampling The auditor may select samples of documentation to be provided Service provider bills, including proof of payment, etc. Category 2 equipment For consortia, a sample of the consortium s members to ensure members compliance 17

TESTING What is Sufficient Documentation? The following slides provide examples of documentation examined during an audit The examples are not all-inclusive Additional documentation may be requested throughout the audit process 18

SUFFICIENT DOCUMENTATION Requests for Services Requests for Proposals Copies of bids received (winning AND losing) Documentation supporting the selection of the service provider E.g., individual evaluation score sheets, summary score sheets, bid meeting notes, meeting sign-in sheets, etc. Correspondence with potential bidders, if any 19

SUFFICIENT DOCUMENTATION Eligibility for Schools, School Districts, or Consortia Containing Schools or School Districts Auditors determine whether the Beneficiary s school(s) is recognized on the State s Department of Education (DOE) website 20

SUFFICIENT DOCUMENTATION Eligibility for Schools, School Districts, or Consortia Containing Schools or School Districts If the school is not identified on the DOE website, the Beneficiary may provide: A letter from the DOE recognizing the school as meeting the State s definition of elementary or secondary education Other support, such as certification of accreditation, school charter, bylaws, etc. demonstrating the school meets the State s definition of elementary or secondary education 21

SUFFICIENT DOCUMENTATION Eligibility for Schools, School Districts, or Consortia Containing Schools or School Districts A network diagram demonstrating Non-Instructional Facilities receiving Category 2 funds are essential for the transmission of data to educational buildings 22

SUFFICIENT DOCUMENTATION Eligibility for Schools, School Districts, or Consortia Containing Schools or School Districts Documentation demonstrating residential schools serve unique populations, as required by the FCC s Sixth Report & Order Schools on Tribal lands Schools that serve children with physical, cognitive, and behavioral disabilities Schools that serve children with medical needs Juvenile justice schools, where eligible Schools with 35 percent or more students eligible for NSLP 23

SUFFICIENT DOCUMENTATION Eligibility for Libraries or Consortia Containing Libraries Documentation demonstrating the library is eligible in accordance with the Library Services & Technology Act (LSTA) Documentation demonstrating the library s budget is separate and independent of a school If a budget is not available, documentation demonstrating the library s sources of revenue are independent of a school 24

SUFFICIENT DOCUMENTATION Category 2 Budgets For schools, school districts, and consortia containing schools or school districts, student enrollment reports supporting the number of students listed in the FCC Form 471 If enrollment figures are not the same as figures used for the discount rate calculation, ensure you maintain reliable documentation for the number of full and part-time students identified in the enrollment. For libraries and consortia containing libraries, square footage floor plans as submitted to the LSTA 25

SUFFICIENT DOCUMENTATION Discount Calculations Documentation supporting the enrollment data and NSLP eligibility listed in the FCC Form 471 Do not rely on the State to maintain the NSLP data If the data maintained by the State contains data updated from a date other than the date used for completing the FCC Form 471, the auditor will rely on the State s revised data if the Beneficiary did not maintain the original documentation, which could produce a lower discount rate 26

SUFFICIENT DOCUMENTATION Category 2 Equipment Fixed Asset Listing (FAL), including the model, installation date, and location of the equipment Delivery receipts, if available Floor plans for wiring and cable drops If equipment has been uninstalled or removed, documentation demonstrating why and current location 27

SUFFICIENT DOCUMENTATION Basic Maintenance of Internal Connections Contract, including the list of equipment to be maintained with BMIC funds FAL, including the model and location of the equipment maintained Documentation, such as maintenance logs, demonstrating the maintenance was performed Records must be adequate for the auditor to determine the actual time performing eligible versus ineligible services. 28

SUFFICIENT DOCUMENTATION CIPA Documentation demonstrating an Internet filter was in place during the funding year audited Copy of the filter log Service provider bills for the purchase and/or renewal of the filter along with proof of payment Copy of the Internet Safety Policy (ISP), or Acceptable Use Policy (AUP) 29

SUFFICIENT DOCUMENTATION CIPA Documentation demonstrating a public hearing was held to discuss the ISP or AUP with the public E.g., Meeting minutes Documentation demonstrating a public notice was posted prior to the public hearing to discuss the ISP or AUP The public notice should specifically state the ISP or AUP will be discussed 30

SUFFICIENT DOCUMENTATION Sufficient Resources If the Beneficiary s non-discounted share has not been paid in-full, copy of the budget demonstrating funds have been budgeted to pay the non-discounted share Documentation demonstrating training has been provided to personnel to properly use the services Documentation demonstrating appropriate equipment and software have been secured to use the services 31

SUFFICIENT DOCUMENTATION Services Received Copies of service provider bills Proof that the Beneficiary s non-discounted share has been paid E.g., Cancelled checks, bank statements, accounts payable history 32

SUFFICIENT DOCUMENTATION Services Received Reconciliation between the eligible services billed and the services invoiced on the BEAR Service providers are asked to provide a similar reconciliation for services invoiced on the SPI Documentation demonstrating the reimbursement or credit for the funded services has been received 33

AVOIDING PITFALLS Inadequate Competitive Bidding Process Ensure you select a service that was requested on the FCC Form 470 and RFP For instance, negotiating for or selecting a service provider offering a higher bandwidth than requested can inadvertently taint the competitive bidding process since other service providers may not have known you would consider higher bandwidth Do not stray away from the evaluation criteria published in your FCC Form 470 or RFP Service providers may not have the accurate information to provide an informed bid 34

AVOIDING PITFALLS Inadequate Competitive Bidding Process Criteria for the cost of eligible services should be evaluated only for cost For instance, if a service or product is considered inferior to another, then it should be reflected in a separate quality criterion. Scoring a higher cost service provider more favorable in the cost criteria because the service or product is better value does not demonstrate you considered cost of the eligible services as the primary factor. 35

AVOIDING PITFALLS Inadequate Competitive Bidding Process Ensure you can demonstrate disqualified bids did not meet the requirements of the services requested Not considering a bid received because it offered a lower bandwidth than other service providers is not a valid reason for disqualification if the lower bandwidth was still within the range requested. 36

AVOIDING PITFALLS Over-Invoicing the Schools & Libraries Program Maintain reconciliations demonstrating how the services billed in the service provider bill agree to the pre-discounted cost of services in the BEAR Services invoiced to SLP must have been requested in the FCC Form 471 or approved by SLP as a service substitution Ensure a proper allocation of costs has been made for ineligible students or locations 37

AVOIDING PITFALLS Over-Invoicing the Schools & Libraries Program Have a secondary reviewer examine invoices for accuracy Invoicing under the incorrect FRN could result in recommending recovery of dollars disbursed Ensure any rebates or free services have been accounted for Equipment or services delivered at no charge or at a discounted rate not available to the public may constitute a rebate in which the assigned value should be reduced from the pre-discounted cost of the eligible services invoiced to SLP 38

AVOIDING PITFALLS Lack of Documentation Maintain documentation of the enrollment and NSLP figures that were used in submitting the FCC Form 471 Ensure an accurate fixed asset listing is maintained for E-rate supported equipment 39

AVOIDING PITFALLS Lack of Documentation Maintain evidence the technology protection measure was in place and the Internet Safety Policy existed Remember that the FCC rules require documentation to be maintained for ten years following the last date of service received Maintain documentation demonstrating the most costeffective service provider was selected when a service provider other than the cheapest option was selected 40

AVOIDING PITFALLS Insufficient Resources to Make Effective Use of Services Demonstrate you have the resources to provide adequate maintenance to keep equipment operational Ensure you can pay the service provider for your nondiscounted share of services within 90 days following the last date of services received Demonstrate necessary equipment will be purchased and installed to utilize the E-rate supported equipment and services 41

Reporting A finding is a condition that shows evidence of noncompliance with FCC rules and SLP regulations An other matter is a condition that does not necessarily constitute a rule violation but warrants the Beneficiary and SLP management s attention An exit conference is conducted during the reporting phase to discuss the audit results and any findings or other matters Findings and other matters will be communicated throughout the audit as they arise A survey will be provided for the Beneficiary to gather feedback on the audit process and suggest improvements 42

REPORTING Audit Findings All draft audit findings are reviewed by Internal Audit Division management before they are sent to the Beneficiary All draft audit findings are provided to the Beneficiary and Service Provider, if necessary, to obtain a written response All draft audit findings are provided to SLP, with the Beneficiary s response, to obtain a written response SLP seeks recovery and/or takes corrective action 43

REPORTING Audit Reports The internal review process is time consuming (approximately two months) The auditors may be asked for additional information, which may require the auditors to conduct follow-up with the Beneficiary When the review process is complete, the Beneficiary will receive the audit report, which is signed by the Vice President of the Internal Audit Division and contains all findings and other matters with the Schools & Libraries Program responses 44

REPORTING Audit Reports If SLP seeks recovery of funds, SLP will send a Commitment Adjustment (COMAD), or a Recovery of the Improperly Disbursed Funds (RIDF), letter The Beneficiary has a right to appeal the COMAD, or RIDF. Once the final audit report is delivered, the Internal Audit Division is not involved in the corrective action. IAD must maintain its independence from management decisions 45

POST-AUDIT PROCESS Survey Provided We are soliciting information to improve the audit process We ask questions on auditor professionalism Request feedback on suggestions to smooth audit burden and to improve communications Survey results are compiled and shared with USAC Executive Leadership and Board of Directors We also ask questions on USAC Outreach efforts 46

POST-AUDIT SURVEY USAC Outreach Section Q16: Do you or other individuals in your organization utilize USAC resources to help learn about the E- rate Program? <Yes or No Response> Q17. Using the matrix to the right, indicate the USAC resources that you are aware of, utilize, and/or think are effective. Question 17 USAC Website Email Contact SL News Brief Videos/Online Tutorials HATS Visit Webinars Toll-free Customer Support One-on-One Assistance Aware Utilize Effective 47

POST-AUDIT SURVEY USAC Outreach Section Q18: What other means of outreach would you like to see USAC provide? <Response> Q19. Please indicate to what extent USAC provides sufficient information for the following. Question 19 Formatting and itemization of service provider bills Competitive bidding documentation CIPA requirements Discount calculation Document retention requirements Strongly Agree Agree N/A Disagree Strongly Disagree 48

EFFICIENT AUDITS What Can a Beneficiary Do to Ensure Success? Respond to audit requests in a timely manner Ensure the individuals with the appropriate knowledge are available 49

EFFICIENT AUDITS What Can a Beneficiary Do to Ensure Success? Provide complete documentation Use EPC for documentation If the Beneficiary does not believe complete documentation is available, inform the auditor immediately so that alternative procedures can be discussed Seek assistance from service providers IAD notifies service providers of the audit 50

ADDITIONAL RESOURCES Information regarding audits is located on USAC s website at http://www.usac.org/about/about/program-integrity/ Samples and examples of various documents are located on USAC s website at http://www.usac.org/sl/tools/samples.aspx 51

Q&A SESSION

THANK YOU!