INTRODUCTION. Background

Similar documents
Environmental Life Cycle Inventory of Portland Cement Concrete

Life Cycle Assessment of the Cement Industry in Zimbabwe

Air Emissions 101. What are Some Types of Emissions? Oil & Gas Emissions: In Context VOC

Annex 2: National Environmental Quality Standards (Extract from the Gazette of Pakistan applicable to STZ CETP)

WeatherBoards Fiber Cement

REVISED NATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY STANDARDS (NEQS)

JAWS Concentrated Cartridge Packaging Technology Environmental Impact Study

SWCAA Emission Inventory Instructions

NRMCA Member National and Regional Life Cycle Assessment Benchmark (Industry Average) Report

2017 Journal of Industrial Ecology

Wastewater Treatment clarifier

CE 370. Wastewater Characteristics. Quality. Wastewater Quality. The degree of treatment depends on: Impurities come from:

Whiting Business Unit

Coke Manufacturing. Environmental Guidelines for. Multilateral Investment Guarantee Agency. Industry Description and Practices. Waste Characteristics

Terrie Boguski Harmony Environmental, LLC Kansas State University. January 2010

Table TSD-A.1 Source categories included under Section 202 Section 202 Source IPCC Sector IPCC Source Category Greenhouse Gases

Dr. Arthur Rosenfeld Commissioner California Energy Commission th Street Phone: (916) Sacramento, CA 95814

Statewide Greenhouse Gas Emissions inventory data with preliminary emissions estimates for 2016

FIBERGLASS INSULATION

SNAP CODE: SOURCE ACTIVITY TITLE: Fine Ceramics Materials NOSE CODE:

Energy Savings Analysis for County Greenhouse Gas Inventory

Air Pollution Sources Overview. Amy Roberts, Division Manager January 24, 2019

2007 Area Source Emissions Inventory Methodology UNSPECIFIED COMBUSTION SOURCES

ALLEGHENY COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT AIR QUALITY PROGRAM March 27, 2002

New PRTR-data 2015 in thru.de

Environmental life cycle assessment of zero liquid discharge treatment technologies for textile industries, Tirupur A case study

Chapter Overview. Chapter 3: Sources of Air Pollution 3-1. Role of Sources of Air Pollution in an Air Quality Management Program.

UDWQ POTW Nutrient Removal Cost Impact Study: Analysis of Tremonton City Wastewater Treatment Plant

LIFE CYCLE INVENTORY OF CONTAINER SYSTEMS FOR WINE. Final Report. Prepared for. Tetra Pak, Inc.

calcium oxide removes acidic oxides basic oxides acidic oxides basic oxides Iron obtained from the blast furnace is contaminated with

Notification of Department of Industrial Works

WASTEWATER TREATMENT

ENVIRONMENTAL PRODUCT DECLARATION ROLL FORMED STEEL PANELS

EMISSIONS ACTIVITY CATEGORY FORM IRON PRODUCTION

Workshop on Gasification Technologies March 2-3, 2006 Tampa, Florida

Pyrometallurgy of iron is still the most important pyrometallurgical process economically.

Environmental Assessment and Economic Analysis of Porous Pavement at Sidewalk

The Energy and Carbon Footprint of Water Reclamation and Water Management in Greater Chicago

Liquefied natural gas [EDP (0)]

Vista Canyon Transit Center - Air Quality Technical Memorandum

Superintendence Company of India Private Limited, Plot Y-23, Block-EP, Sector-V, Salt Lake City, Kolkata, West Bengal

having examined Legislative Decree No.21 of 1996 with respect to the Environment, as amended by Legislative Decree No. 8 of 1997,

Schedule of Accreditation

Appendix C: GHG Emissions Model

Report of Independent Accountants

Appendix H: Air Quality (Task 5.3.6) H.8 Emissions Study: ORC Compared to Open Flaring

WG 11 - Hydrogen Energy

A- 1: Emissions of pollutants into the atmospheric air. 2) Relevance for environmental policy... 3

UNSD/UNEP QUESTIONNAIRE 2004 ON ENVIRONMENT STATISTICS

75 th STREET WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT UPGRADES PROJECT

having examined Legislative Decree No.21 of 1996 with respect to the and Ministerial Order No.10 of 1999 with respect to the Environmental

ORGANOCLAY CARBON FOOTPRINT

Fonterra Sustainability Report Environmental Data Reporting Notes

Bord Na Móna Environmental Ltd trading as ANUA

Sources of Nitrogen in Alberta

UNRESTRICTED ILLIMITÉ Environmental Performance Chalk River Laboratories, 2018 March Report Availability of emissions data is outlined on each graph.

U.S. Efforts to Reduce Greenhouse Gas Emissions: The Transportation Sector

NH 3 Fuel The Other Hydrogen

GLYFINERY. Life cycle assessment of green chemicals and bioenergy from glycerol: Environmental life cycle assessment. Dr Maria Müller-Lindenlauf

APPENDIX E EMISSIONS ESTIMATE FOR GENERAL CONFORMITY

Coal Ash Concrete Blocks for Reduction of Algal Growth and Ammonia Toxicity

Multilateral Investment Guarantee Agency General Environmental Guidelines

UNRESTRICTED ILLIMITÉ Environmental Performance Chalk River Laboratories, 2018 June Report Availability of emissions data is outlined on each graph.

APPENDIX I. LAMPIRAN I - RKL DAN RPL KEGIATAN TERPADU PROYEK PENGEMBANGAN TANGGUH LNG i

GHG Inventory Report February 2018 KENT COUNTY REGIONAL RESOURCE RECOVERY FACILITY 2017 GREENHOUSE GAS (GHG) EMISSION INVENTORY

Michigan Department of Environmental Quality Air Quality Division RENEWABLE OPERATING PERMIT STAFF REPORT

State Of The Art (SOTA) Manual For Non-Hazardous Onsite Remediation Processes

DOE/PPPO/ &D1 FBP-ER-PRO-WD-RPT-0001 Revision 3 April ENVIRONMENTAL NON-RADIOLOGICAL PROGRAM INFORMATION

2005 Environmental Survey

2004 Environmental Survey

Duffin Creek Water Pollution Control Plant Odour Control

Appendix D JWPCP Background and NDN

Alan D. Hatfield PE Braemar Wavespec USA Houston, Texas. Yukon Energy Corporation LNG Workshop

Making Waste Productive. Creating Energy from Waste

Re: Casey Middle School at 1301 High Street in Boulder, Colorado Follow-Up Indoor Air Quality Monitoring (Hydrogen Sulfide)

Product Models & Specifications

Anaerobic process. An introduction. Ecochemicals UAB

Table 1:Contribution to total emissions of the CORINAIR90 inventory (28 countries)

Petroleum Refining. Environmental Guidelines for. Multilateral Investment Guarantee Agency. Industry Description and Practices. Waste Characteristics

CANADA-WIDE STANDARDS FOR PM & OZONE STATUS OF JURISDICTIONAL IMPLEMENTATION ACTIVITIES MANITOBA

AMENA Conference May 12 nd 13 th, 2011 Guadalajara, Mexico

APPA 2017 Fuels 1. Energy Fuel Types Fuel consumption What fuels are we using? What are we using it for?

C1 The Essential Questions

CRT glass substrates [EDP (1)]

Life Cycle Assessment of a Rock Crusher

ENVIRONMENTAL BENEFITS ON A LIFE CYCLE BASIS OF USING BAGASSE-DERIVED ETHANOL AS A GASOLINE OXYGENATE IN INDIA

Date Application Signed: Principal Executive Officer / Owner Signature FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

Carbon footprint report 2013

CHAPTER 4 WASTEWATER CHARACTERISTICS WASTEWATER FLOWS

7624 Riverview Road Cleveland, Ohio

2. How can the University have an expansion of the Cogeneration Facility without an increase in the amount of coal used?

Prakruti Environmental Engineers (Environmental Laboratory), 1, Utkanth Society, B/H Alkapuri Club, Alkapuri, Vadodara, Gujarat

Green chemicals from biorefineries with glycerol as feedstock: a life cycle assessment

Integrated Pollution Prevention and Control (IPPC) Reference Document on Best Available Techniques in the Cement and Lime Manufacturing Industries

Coal Gasification Study

Gasoline [EDP (1)]

Worldwide Pollution Control Association

Module 4 : Hydrogen gas. Lecture 29 : Hydrogen gas

CEMENT PLANT ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNOLOGY FOR ACHIEVING HIGH SO 2 REMOVAL

Industrial Gases. Chapter 3 1. NITROGEN. 1.1 Manufacture

Transcription:

Construction Technology Laboratories, Inc. 5400 Old Orchard Road Skokie, Illinois 60077 847.965.7500 Fax 847.965.6541 www.ctlgroup.com August 11, 2003 Mr. Jan Prusinski Executive Director Slag Cement Association P.O. Box 2615 Sugar Land, TX 77487-2615 Life Cycle Inventory of Slag Cement Manufacturing Process CTL Project No. 312012 Dear Mr. Prusinski, As authorized by Mr. Randy Dunlap, President, Slag Cement Association, on June 28, 2002, Construction Technology Laboratories, Inc. (CTL) has completed a life cycle inventory of the manufacture of slag. This report contains the basis, methodology, and summary of survey results. INTRODUCTION A life cycle inventory (LCI) is a compilation of the materials and energy inputs and the emissions to air, land, and water associated with the manufacture of a product, operation of a process or provisions of a service. Background Slag, also known as ground granulated blast furnace slag, is a supplementary itious material used as a partial repla for portland in concrete. Slag is waste material from a blast furnace during the production of pig iron. This life cycle inventory for slag assumes slag comes into to the system boundary with no environmental burdens since it is a waste product. To process slag so it can be used as a supplementary itious material in concrete, it is quenched with water and ground. The manufacture of slag includes the following processes: (i) quenching/granulation, (ii) dewatering and/or drying, (iii) crushing, (iv) grinding, (v) storage, and (vi) shipping. The functional unit, the basis for comparison, is one ton of slag. The system boundary for the slag manufacturing LCI was selected to start at the point where slag is quenched with water and end with slag ready for shipment. The system boundary does not include upstream profiles of energy sources. For example, the energy and emissions associated with

Mr. Jan Prusinski August 11, 2003 Page 2 producing coal or generating electricity are not included. However, the quantities of all fuels are included, and some of the emissions to air from combustion of natural gas are included. * METHODOLOGY Data Collection Construction Technology laboratories, Inc. (CTL) collected data from members of the Slag Cement Association. A questionnaire and instructions (attached as Appendix A) were submitted to Mr. Jan Prusinski of the Slag Cement Association who then forwarded the questionnaires to association members. Completed questionnaires were returned to CTL and are confidential. The questionnaire consists of three parts: Part I is general facility information, Part II is detailed production information for the facility, and Part III is detailed transportation information. For each site producing either slag granules or slag, one questionnaire was completed. The responder reported the materials, energy, and emissions to air, water, and land for each stage in the manufacture of slag ; although not all responders reported all data. All fuels, energy, and emissions associated with transportation were reported separately. Where available, data were reported for 12 consecutive months of operation. If data for a 12- month period were not available, the time period for which data were available was reported. If a quantity is not available or unknown, a? was reported; if a quantity is not applicable, N/A was reported; and if a quantity is in fact zero, 0 was reported. Three data-quality indicators were required and reported for each data point: source, type, and year. Refer to the data-quality guidelines in Appendix A for an explanation of the data-quality indicators. The source of all the data reported was facility specific. The type of data was a combination of measured, calculated, and estimated. The data were collected in 2001 and 2002. Data Compilation Construction Technology Laboratories, Inc. evaluated the data for order-of-magnitude accuracy and completeness and worked with responders to clarify reported data. Thirteen questionnaires were returned to CTL and twelve are included in this LCI. One questionnaire did not contain sufficient operating data. CTL summarized the data by calculating a production weighted- * The following emissions to air from combustion of natural gas are included in this LCI: carbon monoxide, hydrogen sulfide, metals, methane, nitrogen oxides, non-methane hydrocarbons, particulate matter, and sulfur oxides.

Mr. Jan Prusinski August 11, 2003 Page 3 average for the U.S. Consequently, the data are not traceable to a particular plant and confidentiality is ensured. SUMMARY OF DATA Annual data for the life cycle inventory of the manufacture of slag are summarized in the following tables. Table 1 lists the summary results of the materials, energy, and emissions for the manufacture of slag. Table 2 lists the ancillary materials used in the various stages of manufacturing slag. Table 3 summarizes the emission to air, water, and land. Table 4 summarizes fuel and electricity use. Table 5 summarizes shipping data. The material shipped includes slag to granulators, slag granules from granulating to grinding facilities, ancillary materials, and slag to distribution centers. We appreciate the opportunity to be of service to the Slag Cement Association and look forward to assisting you with the next phase of this project. Please contact one of us if you have any questions. Sincerely, CONSTRUCTION TECHNOLOGY LABORATORIES, INC. Medgar Marceau Building Scientist Building Science and Sustainability Martha G. VanGeem, PE Principal Engineer Building Science and Sustainability mmarceau@ctlgroup.com mvangeem@ctlgroup.com Phone: 847-972-3154 847-972-3156

Mr. Jan Prusinski August 11, 2003 Page 4 Table 1. Summary Results Materials (M), Energy (En), and Emissions (Em) for the Manufacture of Slag Cement Process materials, energy, and emissions, unit Granulation Granulating, Production weighted average Grinding, unit/ton granules Total, Make-up water (M), gallon 184 184 Electricity for water pumps, etc. (En), kwh 10.5 10.5 Purge water leaving site (M), gallon 59.5 59.5 Particulate matter in air (Em), lb 0.0148 0.0148 Suspended solids (Em), lb 0.00248 0.00248 Dewatering and/or drying Natural gas (En), standard ft 3 264 264 No. 2 fuel oil, gallons (En) 0.273 0.273 Electricity (En), kwh 2.15 3.60 5.75 CO (Em), lb 0.0201 0.0201 NO x (Em), lb 0.0388 0.0388 SO 2 (Em) 0.00152 0.000203 0.00173 Particulate matter in purge air (Em), lb 0.00370 0.0149 0.0186 Crushing Electricity (En), kwh 0.0506 0.0506 Grinding Water (M), gallons 13.9 13.9 Liquid fuel for mobile equipment (En), gallon 0.0289 0.0289 Natural gas (En), standard ft 3 23.2 23.2 Electricity (En), kwh 66.4 66.4 Grinding media incorporated in product (M), lb 0.194 0.194 Grinding media discarded off-site (M), lb 0.0618 0.0618 Particulate matter (Em), lb 0.215 0.215 Storage piles Particulate matter (Em), lb 0.00892 0.00892 Storage silos Water (M), gallon 22.4 22.4 Electricity (En), kwh 3.17 3.17 Particulate matter (Em), lb 0.0479 0.0479

Mr. Jan Prusinski August 11, 2003 Page 5 Table 2. Ancillary Materials Materials, unit Total ancillary materials, all stages Granulating, Production weighted average Grinding, unit/ton granules Total, Filter bags, lb 0.00843 0.00843 Grease, gallon 0.00549 0.00549 Grinding aids, lb 0.00252 0.00252 Grinding media, lb 0.706 0.706 Oil, gallon 0.00254 0.00254 Solvents, gallon 0.000220 0.000220 Table 3. Emissions to Air, Land, and Water Environmental flow, unit 1. Total solid waste, all stages Granulating, Production weighted average Grinding, unit/ton granules Total, Solid waste, ton - slag reject 0.000920 0.000920 Solid waste, ton other 0.000201 0.000201 2. Total emissions to air, all stages Carbon monoxide (CO), lb 0.0786 0.0303 0.109 Hydrogen sulfide, H 2 S, lb 0.539 0.539 Metals (total), lb 0.000131 0.000131 Methane (CH 4 ), lb 0.00274 0.00274 Nitrogen oxides (NO x as NO 2 ), lb 0.0484 0.0484 Non-methane hydrocarbons (total), lb 0.00159 0.00159 Particulate matter, lb 0.0185 0.287 0.305 Sulfur oxides (SO x as SO 2 ), lb 0.460 0.00152 0.462 3. Total water effluent, all stages Water that leaves the site, gallon 59.5 24.8 84.4 Suspended solids, lb 0.00248 0.00968 0.0122 Chemical oxygen demand (COD) 0.0000581 0.0000581

Mr. Jan Prusinski August 11, 2003 Page 6 Table 4. Fuel and Electricity Use Process energy, unit Granulating, Production weighted average Grinding, unit/ton granules Total, Electricity (En), kwh 12.6 70.0 82.7 Natural gas (En), standard ft 3 287 287 No. 2 fuel oil, gallons (En) 0.273 0.273 Liquid fuel for mobile equipment (En), gallon 0.0289 0.0289 Table 5. Transportation* (Shipping) Material and mode of transported Iron blast furnace slag to granulators Material transported, percent Average distance, mile Rail 36.4% 3 Mode not specified 63.6% Not reported Granulated slag to grinding facility Truck 54.2% 5.3 Ship 21.0% 5,000 Mode not specified 24.8% Not reported Slag to distribution terminal Truck 6.9% 70 Rail 29.4% 170 Barge 40.2% 180 Mode not specified 23.5% Not reported Ancillary materials Truck (solids) 9.2% 30 Mode not specified (solids) 90.8% 10 Truck (liquids), gallon 25.4% Not reported Mode not specified (liquids), gallon 74.6% Not reported Purchased fuels Truck (liquid fuels), gallon 21.7% Not reported Mode not specified (liquid fuels), gallon 78.3% Not reported Pipeline (natural gas), standard ft 3 22.8% Not reported Mode not specified (natural gas), standard ft 3 77.2% Not reported *Material transportation is measured in tons unless otherwise noted. Most vessels transporting material over water return full, and most vessels transporting material over land return empty.

APPENDIX A INSTRUCTIONS AND BLANK QUESTIONNAIRE

MATERIALS, ENERGY, AND EMISSIONS FOR SLAG CEMENT The purpose of this questionnaire is to collect life-cycle data on the production of slag. CTL will evaluate the data for accuracy and completeness, and then summarize it for the U.S. average production of slag in a manner that will ensure confidentiality. The results will be presented to the Slag Cement Association in a life cycle inventory report (LCI). An LCI is a compilation of the inputs of materials and energy, and the emissions to air, water, and land to make slag. We have assumed that slag is produced in the following stages: (i) granulation, (ii) dewatering and/or drying, (iii) crushing, (iv) grinding, (v) storage, and (vi) transportation. We are asking you to report the materials, energy, and emissions to air, water, and land for each stage in the production of slag. If a production stage does not exist at your facility, indicate so on the relevant portion of the questionnaire. Similarly, if a process in not covered in the questionnaire, provide the information so that the process can be included. Instructions for completing the questionnaire 1. Complete one questionnaire per facility. 2. The term facility can designate either a granulation facility, or a grinding facility, or combination of both. For example, if slag is granulated at a site in Indiana and ground at a site in Illinois, complete one questionnaire for each facility. 3. The questionnaire consists of three parts: Part I is general facility information, Part II is detailed production information for the facility, and Part III is detailed transportation information. 4. Report data for 12 consecutive months of operation. If data for a 12-month period are not available, report the time period for which data are available. 5. If a quantity is not available or unknown, report? ; if a quantity is not applicable, report N/A ; and if a quantity is in fact zero, report 0. 6. Three data-quality indicators are required for each data point: source, type, and year. Refer to the data quality guidelines on the next page for examples. Source is either F for facility specific, L for literature, or O for other. Type is either M for measured, C for calculated, A for average value, E for estimated, or U for unknown. Year is the year the data was collected or the year the data is based on. 7. All fuels, energy, and emissions associated with transportation should be reported separately. 8. Return complete questionnaire to: Medgar Marceau Construction Technology Laboratories, Inc 5400 Old Orchard Road Skokie, IL 60077 Phone: 847-972-3154 Fax: 847-965-5416 E-mail: MMarceau@CTLgroup.com CTL Project No. 312012 1 of 2 Construction Technology Laboratories, Inc. 7/8/2002

DATA QUALITY GUIDELINES* Data Source Report either L for literature, F for facility, or O for other. Data Type Five types are defined. Report either M for measured, C for calculated, A for averaged, E for estimated, or U for unknown. Measured: the flow quantity is based on continuous measurement. For instance, electricity consumption is readily available from electric meters. Coal consumption is continuously measured with scales or other forms of stock accountability. Calculated: the flow quantity has been calculated using emission factors, mass balance, or other indirect methods. For instance, SOx emissions may have been measured for several years, and an emission factor determined and used for subsequent years. Another example is CO 2 air emissions calculated from the carbon balance. Averaged Value: the flow quantity has been extrapolated from spot measurements. For instance, volatile organic compounds (VOCs) may be measured three times per year, one day each time; from these values the annual quantity may be calculated. Estimated: the flow quantity has been established based on approximations. For instance, the transportation distance for a given raw material may be estimated due to lack of better information. Unknown: This data type is only appropriate for data from the literature when the information provided is insufficient to classify the data as one of the previous types. *We are using the data quality guidelines from the BEES Please Questionnaire Users Guide, http://www.bfrl.nist.gov/oae/software/bees/please/main.html CTL Project No. 312012 2 of 2 Construction Technology Laboratories, Inc. 7/8/2002

PART I Facility Information Company Contact Information Person in Charge of Completing Questionnaire: Address: Tel: Fax: Email: Site Information Site Name: Function (granulation and/or grinding): Site Location: Products Produced at the Site: Name Quantity Produced per Year Slag Date Questionnaire Completed: CTL Project No. 312012 1 of 4 Construction Technology Laboratories, Inc. 7/8/2002

PART II - Production Stage Data Plant name: Reporting period (12 months or other): Production Stage 1. Granulation a. Electricity for water pumps, etc., kwh b. Make-up water, million gallons c. Purge water leaving site, gallons d. Suspended solids in purge water leaving site, lb e. Particulate matter in air, lb f. Other water effluents (list and specify units) Quantity Data quality Source* Type** Year 2. Dewatering and/or drying a. Electricity, kwh b. Natural gas, million standard ft 3 c. Particulate matter in purge air, lb d. Other emissions (list and specify units) 3. Crushing a. Electricity, kwh b. Liquid fuel (list and specify units) c. Particulate matter, lb d. Water, gallons 4. Grinding a. Electricity, kwh b. Liquid fuel (list and specify units) c. Particulate matter, lb d. Grinding media incorporated in product (list and specify units) e. Grinding media reused elsewhere (list and specify units) f. Grinding media discarded off-site (list and specify units) g. Water, gallons 5. Storage piles a. Liquid fuel (list and specify units) b. Particulate matter, lb c. Water, gallons **Specify source: F = site specific, L = from literature, or O = other source *Specify type: M = measured, C = calculated, A = average value, E = estimated, or U = unknown. CTL Project No. 312012 2 of 4 Construction Technology Laboratories, Inc. 7/8/2002

PART II Production Stage Data (Continued) Production Stage 6. Storage silos a. Electricity, kwh b. Liquid fuel (list and specify units) c. Particulate matter, lb d. Water, gallons Quantity Data quality Source* Type** Year 7. Total solid waste, all stages (specify units) a. Solid waste, ton (please describe) 8. Total emissions to air, all stages a. Carbon dioxide (CO 2 ), lb b. Methane (CH 4 ), lb c. Nitrous oxide (N 2 O), lb d. Sulfur oxides (SO X as SO 2 ), lb e. Nitrogen oxides (NO X as NO 2 ), lb f. Carbon monoxide (CO), lb g. Non-methane hydrocarbons (total), lb h. Metals (total) (please describe), lb i. Others (list and specify units), lb 9. Total water effluent, all stages (specify units) a. Wastewater that leaves the site, gallons b. Suspended solids, lb c. Metals (total), lb d. Hydrocarbons (total) (please describe), lb e. Biologic oxygen demand (BOD) f. Ammonia (NH 4 +) g. Nitrogen (N, total) h. Phosphates (PO 4, 3 -) i. Phosphorus (P) j. Chemical oxygen demand (COD) k. Nitrogenous matter (Kjeldhal, as N) l. Nitrates (NO 3 -) m. Nitrogenous matter (unspecified, as N) n. Phosphorous matter (unspecified, as P) o. Nitrogen dioxide (NO 2 ) p. Nitrogen oxide (NO) q. Nitrites (NO 2 -) r. Phosphorus pentoxide (P 2 O 5 ) s. Others (list and specify units) *Specify source: F = site specific, L = from literature, or O = other source **Specify type: M = measured, C = calculated, A = average value, E = estimated, or U = unknown. CTL Project No. 312012 3 of 4 Construction Technology Laboratories, Inc. 7/8/2002

PART III - Transportation Stage Data Plant name: Reporting period (12 months or other): Transportation Raw materials, all stages a. Iron blast furnace slag, ton Quantity Data quality Distance Empty Data quality Mode return*** Source* Type** Year (mile) (yes/no) Source* Type** Year Products, all stages a. Granulated slag to grinding facility, ton b. Slag to distribution terminal, ton c. Others (list and specify units) Total ancillary materials, all stages a. Grinding media (specify type), lb b. Filter bags, lb c. Oil, gallon d. Grease, gallon e. Solvents (describe), gallon f. Others (list and specify units) Total purchased fuels, all stages a. Natural gas, standard ft 3 b. Fuel oil, gallon c. Diesel oil, gallon d. Gasoline, gallon e. Others (list and specify units) *Specify source: F = site specific, L = from literature, or O = other source **Specify type: M = measured, C = calculated, A = average value, E = estimated, or U = unknown. ***For example, if trucks or barge usually make the return trip empty, indicate "yes". CTL Project No. 312012 4 of 4 Construction Technology Laboratories, Inc. 7/8/2002