Pioneering China s Tallest: Form and Structure of the Ping An Finance Ce nter

Similar documents
Council on Tall Buildings. and Urban Habitat

Council on Tall Buildings and Urban Habitat

Asia & Australasia: A Selection of Written Works on the World's Tall Building Forefront

WANCHAI,HONG KONG. Submitted By Nidhi Setya Prachi Patwardhan Priyanka Dherange

Council on Tall Buildings. and Urban Habitat BACKGROUND SECTION STEEL REINFORCED CONCRETE SHEAR WALL STEEL PLATE COMPOSITE SHEAR WALL

Structural Design Challenges for Plaza 66 Tower 2

Structural Design of Super High Rise Buildings in High Seismic Intensity Area

Structural Performance Assessment and Control of Super Tall Buildings During Construction

Council on Tall Buildings

PEER/CSSC Tall Building Design Case Study Building #1. J. Andrew Fry John Hooper Ron Klemencic Magnusson Klemencic Associates

0306 SEISMIC LOADS GENERAL

Pre-schematic Considerations. Who. What. Where

Office Building-G. Thesis Proposal. Carl Hubben. Structural Option. Advisor: Dr. Ali Memari

Technical Assignment #3 November 15, 2004 Lateral System Analysis and Confirmation Design

181 Fremont San Francisco, CA. Proposal 12/12/2014. Caroline Klatman Structural Option Advisor: Dr. Thomas Boothby

BOAST. West Coast. Set to open this spring, the tallest building on the West Coast resists wind and seismic drifts with massive braces.

Technical Specification for Concrete Structures of Tall Building

CCTV HEADQUARTERS. ARCH 631 Spring 2018 Daniel Edith Mckenzie Rafael

Erie on the Park. Timothy Moore Penn State University Architectural Engineering Structural Emphasis Advisor: Prof. Ali Memari

CASE STUDY OF A 40 STORY BRBF BUILDING LOCATED IN LOS ANEGELES

MOUNTAIN STATE BLUE CROSS BLUE SHIELD HEADQUARTERS

School of Engineering and Applied Science Building Miami University, Oxford, OH Technical Assignment 3 December 3, 2007

3.5 Tier 1 Analysis Overview Seismic Shear Forces

Technical Report #1. Matthew R Peyton

TECHNICAL REPORT 1. Structural Concepts / Structural Existing Conditions. Penn State Hershey Medical Center Children s Hospital. Hershey, Pennsylvania

PEER Tall Building Seismic Design Guidelines

Technical Report #3. Matthew R Peyton

181 Fremont San Francisco, CA. Tech Report 1 9/12/2014. Caroline Klatman Structural Option Advisor: Dr. Thomas Boothby

Structural Concepts and Existing Conditions Report

Brent Ellmann Structural Option 200 Minuteman Park, Andover, MA Structural Consultant: Dr. Hanagan

Performance-based Seismic Design Principles and Objectives of Shanghai Tower

SOHO HIGH RISE CONDOMINIUMS A STUDY OF LIGHTWEIGHT CONCRETE CONSTRUCTION

Calculation of Wind Loads on Structures according to ASCE 7-10

Thesis Cira Centre Philadelphia. Structural Redesign of Lateral Force Resisting System. Andrew Kauffman Structural Option

VOLUNTARY - EARTHQUAKE HAZARD REDUCTION IN EXISTING HILLSIDE BUILDINGS (Division 94 Added by Ord. No. 171,258, Eff. 8/30/96.)

Third Avenue New York, NY. Structural Concepts/ Structural Existing Conditions Report September 30, Michelle L.

Metropolis Mega-Development: A Case Study in Fast-Tracked Performance-Based Seismic Design of High-Rise Concrete Towers in Los Angeles

Challenges and Opportunities for the Structural Design of the Jamsil Lotte World Tower

111 MORGAN ST. Ryan Friis

Shin Shin Apparels Ltd. (9615) Dag RS. 228, JL 73, Gorat, East Norshinghapur, Zirabo, Savar ( N, E) 27.MAY.2014

La Jolla Commons Office Tower. Appendix Slides. Architecture Breadth. Dual Systems Check. Lateral System. Shear Wall Modeling. Verification.

Lateral System Analysis and Confirmation Design

INSTRUCTOR: ANNE NICHOLS

181 Fremont San Francisco, California

Structural Design Challenges of Merdeka PNB118, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia

S p a c e e l e v a t o r. Structure selection and design Prof Schierle 1

Prepared by Elie F. Issa, Eng. D.E.C. August 2016

Raffle City Chengdu. Taylor Dedeke, Pengyu Liao, William Richard, Kainan Xu, Chen Zhan

THE STUDY ON BEHAVIOUR OF OUTRIGGERS FOR TALL BUILDINGS SUBJECTED TO LATERAL LOAD

Alexis Pacella Structural Option Dr. Schneider Lexington II, Washington D.C. Technical Report #3 November 21,

SEISMIC DESIGN OF STRUCTURE

Influence of Concrete and Steel outrigger and belt truss in high rise Moment Resisting Frames

Jinao Tower The Design Integration of Structural Efficiency

Comparative Study on Seismic Analysis of 20-Storeyed RC Building with Different Shear Wall Locations

CTBUH Technical Paper

IS 1893 and IS Codal Changes

Executive Summary Building Description: Introduction... 13

Marina Bay Sands Hotel Arch 631 Kayla Brittany Maria Michelle

Structural Engineering, Mechanics, and Materials. Preliminary Exam - Structural Design

Johns Hopkins Graduate Student Housing. Thesis Proposal. 929 North Wolfe Street Baltimore, Maryland Brad Oliver Structural Advisor: Professor Memari

MEMORIAL SLOAN-KETTERING CANCER CENTER

Structural System of North-East Asia Trade Tower in Korea

90% Design Submittal Structural Calculations Parking Garage CDRL

Structural Study of the Existing Lateral System

Table 3. Detailed Comparison of Structural Provisions of IRC 2000 and 1997 NEHRP (Continued)

FOUNDATIONS. Foundations Copyright G G Schierle, 2006 Press Esc to end, for next, for previous slide 1

ENTRY FORM. DVASE 2014 Excellence in Structural Engineering Awards Program

HIGH RISE CONDO SOHO, NEW YORK, NY

CCTV Headquarters Case Study. ARCH 631 Haowei Cheng, Peixin Dong, Xiaoying He, Zepeng Jia, Dongqi Zhu

Structural Technical Report 1 Structural Concepts/ Structural Existing Conditions Report

Thesis Proposal. Aquablue at the Golden Mile. Hato Rey, Puerto Rico

Masonry Veneer - Chapter 6. Masonry Veneer Anchored Veneer

See original reference (CODE) for full details

The Harry and Jeanette Weinberg Center Mercy Hospital Medical Office Building Baltimore, MD. Thesis Proposal

Case Study: Challenges of a Single-layer Reticulated Dome

SEISMIC PERFORMANCE OF HIGH-RISE BUILDING

Original Publication: International Journal of High-Rise Buildings Volume 1 Number 3

Traci Peterson Option: Structural Faculty Consultant: Memari. Executive Summary

Massachusetts General Hospital - Building for the Third Century Lateral System Analysis and Confirmation Design

A Study on the Effective Lateral Drift Control of Super-tall Buildings in Korea

Structural Design Engineers 120 Montgomery Street, Suite 1410 San Francisco, California / Fax 415/

Research on seismic behavior of Wood-Concrete Hybrid Structure

Principles of Green Architecture

Technical Report #2. Matthew R Peyton

Brent Ellmann Structural Option 200 Minuteman Park, Andover, MA Structural Consultant: Dr. Hanagan

Structural Requirements

NATIONAL HARBOR BUILDING M

TECHNICAL REPORT III LATERAL STRUCTURAL SYSTEM ANALYSIS

ECMC Skilled Nursing Facility

[TECHNICAL REPORT 3] Lateral System Analysis

The building on 250 West Street is a 7-story multi-use that provides space for parking,

Comparative Study of Irregular-shaped RC Building with Different Lateral Load Resisting Systems

Thesis Proposal. La Jolla Commons Phase II Office Tower San Diego, California. December 13, 2013

Research on Design of High Rise Building Based on Seismic Design Theory

Mastering the Challenges: Lessons from the Recent Past. Chris Harris, Operations Manager, Turner International Middle East Ltd

Xyston Inn. NY. Proposal. Xiaodong Jiang. Structure Option. Advisor: Dr. Linda Hanagan

North Shore at Canton Baltimore, MD Beau Menard Technical Report 1

REINFORCING TABLES INSTALLATION MANUAL

TEMECULA MEDICAL CENTER PRESENTATION OUTLINE

Copyright Materials. American Wood Council

Transcription:

Pioneering China s Tallest: Form and Structure of the Ping An Finance Center David Malott, Director, KPF Dennis Poon, Vice Chairman, Thornton Tomasetti

领先中国之巅 : 平安金融中心的形式与结构 David Malott, Director, KPF Dennis Poon, Vice Chairman, Thornton Tomasetti

Carbon Reduction Goal 2010 2015 2020 2025 2030

Structural EE / EC Definitions Embodied Energy (EE): The total primary energy consumed from direct and indirect processes associated with a product or service and with the boundaries of cradle-to-gate. Embodied Carbon (EC): The sum of fuel related carbon emissions associated with the production / manufacture of all materials.

Embodied Energy Extraction/Harvesting Refining Manufacturing Transportation Construction Function of Design & Construction Embodied Energy / Carbon Operational Energy > HVAC > Lighting > Plugloads > Equipment / Machinery > Function of Design & Operation

Embodied Energy / Carbon Subhead Buildings Operational Energy Buildings Embodied Energy

Structural EE / EC Structural + Facade initial Embodied Energy represents 50% or more of the built project Embodied Energy Case Study

EE / EC Factors

Embodied Carbon Case Study Structural EE / EC Structural initial Embodied Carbon represents over 50% of the built project

Design Concepts Efficient Material Use Building / Material Adaptive Reuse Durability, Resilience Adaptability Structural Factors Deconstruction Thermal Efficiency Thermal Mass Integrated Approaches

Structural Factors Building Components Foundations Superstructure Lateral System Façade / Building Envelope Roof

Medium soft soil, site class II~III (China code), D (IBC) Rock is about 30m down 0 m - 20 m - 35 m - 50 m - 60 m - 70 m (-230 ) Shenzhen Soil Profile Silty Clay Fully-weathered Granite Severely-weathered Granite Moderately-weathered Granite Slightly-weathered Granite

Foundation Pile-supported Tower Mat (Octagon Shape) 5m (16.4 ft) thick under the core, 3m (9.8 ft) outside the core C40 (4.9 ksi) concrete 16 hand-dug concrete caissons under the core 5.6m (18.4 ft) diameter with 7.4m (24.3 ft) bellout 30 m (98 ft) long Capacity 344,000 kn (working load) 8 hand-dug concrete caissons under the super columns 7.1m (23.3 ft) diameter with 9.3m (30.5 ft) bellout 30 m (98 ft) long Capacity 543,000 kn (working load) Pile-supported Podium Mat (with tension piles) 1m (3.3 ft) thick 154 hand-dug concrete caissons 1.2m and 1.5m (3.9 and 4.9 ft) diameter 30 m (98 ft) long 1.2m dia. Pile Compression Capacity 9,000 kn, tension Capacity 11,000 kn 1.5m dia. Pile Compression Capacity 14,000 kn, tension Capacity 16,000 kn

Foundation Full Site Plan Tower Mat Podium Mat Secant Pile Wall Contiguous Bored Pile Wall

Tower Foundation plan

SAFE Model for Foundation Design Tower mat thickness is controlled by one-way / two way shear check. Caisson diameter governed by concrete strength, bellout diameter governed by rock bearing strength. Maximum settlement at tower core area ~ 20mm.

zone 8 zone 7 zone 6 zone 5 zone 4 zone 3 zone 2 zone 1 2 Stories 16 Stories 15 Stories 16 Stories 15 Stories 14 Stories 9 Stories 16 Stories Project Stacking 660m MEP/Refuge (Typ.) Tower spire Sky restaurant Observation floor Office 4.5 m (14.8ft) typical floor height basement 10 Stories 5 Stories Retail (zone podium)

Lateral Load Resisting System Core + Outrigger + Mega Frame Core is composite Primarily reinforced concrete walls Embedded steel plates / steel w-shapes 4 two-story Outriggers at MEP/refuge levels engaging super columns Steel truss outriggers Composite concrete + steel super columns Exterior Mega Frame 2-story/1-story high Steel double belt trusses at MEP/refuge levels each zone linking super columns Mega braces between belt trusses

Lateral System Architecture and structure in harmony Z7 Z6 Z5 Z4 Z3 Z2 Z1

Double-height Outrigger Trusses At four zones Within core flange walls 1 st line of seismic defense (yielding) L95-96 L79-81 L48-50 L25-27 Core 6 5 3 1 Outriggers

Super Columns + Double Belt Trusses Steel trusses at seven zones 2 nd line of seismic defense The belt trusses and super columns are designed to take 25% of total base shear in strength Mega Frame 6 5 4 3 2 1 1 story single belt truss 1 story double belt truss 2 story double belt truss 1 story double belt truss 2 story double belt truss 2 story double belt truss L10 1 story double belt truss

Mega Frame Super Columns + Double Belt Trusses + Mega Brace Between belt trusses 2 nd line of seismic defense The mega brace is designed to attract 6% of total base shear in the exterior mega frame based on relative stiffness Mega brace

Floor Framing MEP/Refuge TG TF TC TB 13,180m 30,000m 13,180m T2 T3 T5 T7 13,180m 30,000m Outrigger truss Floor horizontal bracing 13,180m Double belt truss 1.5m wide corner belt truss Moment connected beams at the corner

Core ~32 m x 32 m in plan - Flange wall 1.5m thick to 0.5m - Web wall 0.8m thick to 0.4m thick - Core walls below level 12 have full length steel plates - composite concrete shear wall Link Beam Core Wall Some link beams have embedded steel shapes to satisfy code shear requirement Some walls have embedded steel plates to satisfy code shear requirement Core

Core + Super Columns Column size - 6.0x3.2m (base) - 2.9x1.4m (top) - Embedded steel ratio: 4.0% ~ 6% above ground, 8% in the basement Super Columns Core Concrete super column with embedded steel

Outrigger Trusses Core + Super Columns + 2-story Outrigger Truss Core Super Column Outrigger Truss

Belt Trusses for Mega Frame Core + Super Columns + Outrigger Truss + Double Belt Truss Super Column Double Belt Truss

+ Mega Brace + Chevron Brace Chevron Brace Mega Braces for Mega Frame Primary function of mega brace is to attract enough shear in the exterior mega frame as required by China code Primary function of chevron brace Support recessing corners of the tower Mega Brace Double Belt Truss

Section of outrigger at mechanical level

Exterior megaframe

Lateral structural systems components.

Tower Dynamic Properties Primary Mode Shapes and Periods (T) T = 8.4 s T = 8.4 s T = 3.4 s

Tower Structure Natural Mode Translational mode Torsional mode

Seismic Design Requirements in China Seismic Fortification Intensity = 7 degree (China Code) Frequent earthquake (no damage to building structure) 50 year event (50 year earthquake at 63% exceedance) All members remain elastic Ground acceleration = 35 cm/s 2 3.6% g Medium earthquake (building structures can be repaired) 475 year event (50 year earthquake at 10% exceedance) Core link beams and outrigger trusses allow to yield All other members stay elastic Ground acceleration = 100 cm/s 2 10.2% g Severe earthquake (building structures will not collapse) 2475 year event (50 year earthquake at 2% exceedance) All lateral resisting members can yield in bending, but remain elastic in shear Super column remains elastic (bending & shear) Ground acceleration = 220 cm/s 2 22.4% g

Tower Structure Response under Earthquake

Stiffness Design 50 year wind Wind Design Criteria 34.7 m/s (77.5 mph) for 10 minute gust at 10 m (33 ) Inter-story drift limit = h/500 (China Code Requirement) MAX Tower Inter-story drift = h/542 1 st floor inter-story drift limit =h/2000 (China code Requirement) Tower 1 st floor inter-story drift = h/8561 Tower top deflection = H/775 Strength Design 100 year wind as per China Code 37.1 m/s (83 mph) wind speed Also apply code load combination factor for strength check 100 year Wind Pressure (from RWDI wind tunnel test) 4.0 kpa (84 psf) at tower top 2.5 kpa (52 psf) at ground floor

Integration of Sustainable Design Aspects Form of the Tower Recessed corners Corner setback Rough corner can reduce vortex shedding effects. Reduction in Wind Load= Smaller core and column sizes Less building mass Smaller seismic forces Less Material = Smaller carbon footprint

Integration of Sustainable Design Aspects Major Component 1. Natural Ventilation - Altitude Air intake The building height allows intake of cooler dryer air from the higher altitude, 0.1% savings of the annual energy consumption 2. Heat Recovery System Using warm exhaust air to heat cool fresh air 0.5% savings of the annual energy consumption 3. High Performance Façade (HPF) The detailing, weight and installation is integrated in the structural design with 2% savings of the annual energy consumption, and optimization of window to wall ratio, curtain wall heat conductivity coefficient (U-value), glass shading coefficient and exterior shading design in the curtain wall system. 4. Ice Storage System Structural assimilation of thermal ice storage system and tanks in the basement 4% savings of the annual energy consumption 5. Occupant lighting controls Structural integration of mechanical openings and shafts for lightning control of areas that cannot utilize natural daylight 4% savings of the annual energy consumption

Integration of Sustainable Design Aspects Additional 1. Daylighting, Structural core has been centered within the tower to maximize day light exposure 2. Main structural component such as outriggers and belt truss have been located in low occupied floors (mechanical and refugee floors) 3. Structural podium roof rainwater collectors Structural podium roofs have been designed to incorporate rainwater collectors to reduce consumption and operation for roof landscaping 100% water savings of summer irrigation needs. 4. Recycled Cooling Tower Bleed Off The structural integration of additional pipes reduces portable water use 30% water savings for flushing use.

Additional Integration of Sustainable Design Aspects Material Overview Goal: Minimize environmental impact from material extraction/harvest, manufacture & transport Used Strategies: Use of recycled materials (Steel and Concrete) Use of Cement Substitutes (Fly Ash, Granulated Blast Furnace Slag) Use of salvaged, reused, refurbished Use of local materials Use of certified wood Use of rapidly renewable materials