A Short History of U.S. Freight Railroads

Similar documents
Overview of America s Freight Railroads

Test bank Chapter 4. Multiple Choice

Railroads and Grain. Association of American Railroads June Summary

Billions of dollars per year in: Savings in shipping costs Taxes and purchases that support tens of thousands of additional jobs Avoided highway

FMR. Railroad Perspective: Past Defines the Future. Transportation Solutions, Inc. Joe Frye, Jr. V.P. Transportation & Logistics FMR

TAPPI Shipping, Receiving & Warehousing Workshop

Joel Palley Office of Policy Office of Rail Policy and Development Federal Railroad Administration April 2013 FREIGHT RAILROADS BACKGROUND

The Fertilizer Institute. Current Transportation Dynamics November 6, 2006 By Tom Williamson, Transportation Consultants Co.

RAIL RENAISSANCE The Changing Dynamics of Freight Transportation. John Miller Group Vice President, Agricultural Products BNSF Railway

Arkansas Transportation Report

Railroads and Grain. Association of American Railroads May Summary

Rail Intermodal Keeps America Moving

INLAND WATERWAYS TRANSPORTATION: Our Competitive Advantage. Delbert R Wilkins Canal Barge Company Big River Moves Leadership Forum April 15, 2013

WATERWAYS: Working for America

Economic Impact Analysis of Short Line Railroads. Louisiana State University - Research Team Dr. Jared Llorens Dr. Jim Richardson Mr.

FMR. Railroad Perspective: Past defines the Future. Transportation Solutions, Inc. Joe Frye, Jr. V.P. Transportation & Logistics FMR

Rail Intermodal Keeps America Moving

Productivity Improvements in the U.S. Rail Freight Industry

Arkansas Transportation Report

America s Inland Waterways

Transportation Research Forum

National Conference of State Legislatures. Minneapolis, Minnesota August 20th, 2014

The Future of Trucking in Virginia: Interstate and Intermodal Strategies

The U.S. Freight Railroad Industry. Ohio Conference on Freight Toledo, Ohio September 21, 2011

American Association of Port Authorities Spring Meeting March 24, 2009

Kentucky Transportation Conference January 22, 2015

Ohio 21 st Century Transportation System It s Ours to Create!

WATERWAYS: Working for America

Freight Railroads: Linking Pennsylvania to the World. Rudy Husband Lehigh Valley Planning Commission April 4, 2018 Allentown, Pennsylvania

Performance Measures for Freight Transportation

Rail - What Does the Future Bring?

Transportation Trends

Northeast Rail Operations Study (NEROps)

The U.S. Freight Railroad Industry: Where We Are in Dan Keen Wichita Ad Valorem Conference July 31, 2018

Ports play a critical role in the national transportation system, providing the access

The Intermodal Connection to Rural America's Resources, Economic Development, and Sustainability

Massachusetts Rail Plan. September 16, 2010

Railroads and Fertilizer

Summary. Freight transportation in New England

National Cooperative Freight Research Program Project 03. Gordon Proctor TRB Summer Meeting 2010

STATEMENT OF JENNIFER MACDONALD ASSISTANT VICE PRESIDENT GOVERNMENT AFFAIRS ASSOCIATION OF AMERICAN RAILROADS BEFORE THE

Freight Trends and Freight Rail

1. Reasons for Recommendation

PRIVATE PASSENGER RAIL Live Long and Prosper?

Darrell Wilson AVP Government Relations The Future of Freight Panel August 26 th, 2014

15th Annual Masters of Logistics Survey: Strategy Shift

STATEMENT OF EDWARD R. HAMBERGER PRESIDENT & CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER ASSOCIATION OF AMERICAN RAILROADS BEFORE THE

Railway-Related Cement Consumption Outlook

Union Pacific Corporation (UNP) Analyst: Brandon Montler Fall Recommendation: HOLD Target Price until (12/31/2016): $94

The Power to Adapt Through Innovation EDIST 2018 Toronto, Ontario January 18, 2018

Introduction to North American Rail Transportation

Arkansas Transportation Report

Analyst: Meilin C. Pierce Spring Recommendation: Hold Target Stock Price (12/31/2016): $120

RAIL PRICE ADVISOR. The Rail Intelligence Newsletter. AAR Historical Rail Rate Changes are Misleading

Rail Freight and Passenger

The Public Sector Takes a Fresh Look at Railroads

I-81 Update July 2007

W R I T T E N S T A T E M E N T O F R U S S E L L A

American Short Line and Regional Railroad Association. North American Short Line and Regional Railroads Industry Report

Northeast Rail Operations Study (NEROps)

The Track record. Christopher C. Barnekov RAILROAD DEREGULATION. whether it continues to enjoy increasing

Ag TC Meeting June 26, 2014 San Francisco. Whiteside & Associates/Alliance for Rail Competition Billings, Montana

American Association of Port Authorities Marine Terminal Management Program

Multimodal Transport Institute Forum. Tom Malloy Thoroughbred Direct Intermodal Services. October 11, 2012 Los Angeles, California

Inland Waterway Navigation

Open Top Opportunities. Business Development Design Product for Rail Transport. Brent Lichty Union Pacific RR. Lindy Pope Norfolk Southern RR

NEW YORK TRANSPORTATION FACTS ECONOMIC IMPACTS

SHIFTING INTERNATIONAL TRADE ROUTES Derrick Smith VP, Emerging Markets January 24, 2014

I know that you all understand the critical importance of the freight transportation system

Ron O Blenis, PE Senior Rail Project Manager (617)

Global Coalition for Efficient Logistics. The Shipping Industry and the Global Economy! June 2009! Swiss based non profit public private partnership

Rail Service 101. MEDC Spring Conference June 10, 2014

Delivering a Sustainable Railway. Summary

A MODAL COMPARISON OF DOMESTIC FREIGHT TRANSPORTATION EFFECTS ON THE GENERAL PUBLIC EXECUTIVE SUMMARY. November 2007

Rural Transportation At A Glance

Rail Freight Service Review. Submission of the New Brunswick Department of Transportation

FREIGHT POLICY TRANSPORTATION INSTITUTE. The Critical Status of Agricultural Transportation in the Pacific Northwest

Project Purpose and Need Statements

Evolution of Rail Related Energy Markets. The Energy Forum New York, NY March 18, 2013

Conrail - 40 Years of Operational Success

Chronology of Railroading in America

PROJECTS. The KIPDA MPO s Central Location

NEW COMPETITIVE REALITIES: GROWTH AT A LOWER COST

Chapter 5 - Needs Assessment and Freight Forecast

THE AMERICAN WATERWAYS OPERATORS ABOUT US

Speaker s notes for Rethinking our Path to Mobility presentation

Ohio Department of Transportation Ohio Statewide Freight Study/ Plan

Class I Railroad Statistics

KYLE Charge Schedule. Optional Services Catalog Customer Switching and Accessorial Services. Customer Switching.

Trends in the U.S. Rail Network. Mike McClellan Vice President Industrial Products Midwest Association of Rail Shippers July 15, 2014 Lake Geneva, WI

Critical Issues for Transportation Policy And Finance The Second William O. Lipinski Symposium on Transportation Policy

The Ohio Department of Transportation Asset Management Playbook Plays for Success

Marine Transportation System Infrastructure Investment A State Perspective. August 28, 2012 Sean T. Connaughton Secretary of Transportation

Failure to Act. Of current Investment Trends in. Airports, Inland Waterways, and Marine Ports. Infrastructure EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Concerns Regarding Freight Rail Transportation and Regulation. Marvin E. Prater, Ph.D. US Department of Agriculture Transportation Services Division

TRANSPORTATION CHALLENGES IN AGRIBUSINESS

National Association of Counties

Performance and Policy Reform of the U.S. Transportation System. Clifford Winston Brookings Institution

Debra Colbert Waterways Council, Inc. Telling the Maritime Story: Producing a TV Commercial and Video from Fundraising to Distribution

-16- CHAPTER 3 REVENUE GENERATION INTRODUCTION

Transcription:

A Short History of U.S. Freight Railroads Association of American Railroads August 2017 Summary Since their birth more than 185 years ago, railroads have played a crucial role in America s development. They grew rapidly in the decades up to World War I. Following the war, growing competition from highways and waterways and increasingly stringent regulation led to the rail industry s decline. By the 1970s, railroads were at the brink of ruin. The Staggers Rail Act of 1980 brought regulatory balance and gave railroads a new start. They responded by dramatically increasing productivity, sharply lowering rates, and reinvesting hundreds of billions of dollars in private funds, not taxpayer funds back into their networks to create what is now the best freight rail system in the world. Looking ahead, the high quality of America s privately owned freight railroads must be maintained so that they can continue to meet America s transportation needs and help our economy grow. Railroads Were Critical to Early U.S. Development America s first intercity railroad, the 13-mile Baltimore and Ohio Railroad, was completed in early 1830. By 1850, more than 9,000 miles of railroad were in operation. Railroads provided a means for previously inaccessible areas to be developed; for mineral, timber, and agricultural products to get to market; and for the developed and U.S. Railroad Mileage: 1830-1920 undeveloped areas of a growing nation 275,000 250,000 to be bound together. Railroads also played a key role in the Civil War. The North s victory was due in part to its well-organized rail operations and the fact that most of the country s locomotive and railcarbuilding plants were in the North. Regulation and the Big Slide: 1887-1970 225,000 200,000 175,000 150,000 125,000 100,000 In 1887, the Interstate Commerce Act Source: AAR created the Interstate Commerce Commission (ICC) and made railroads the first U.S. industry subject to comprehensive federal economic regulation. Over time, excessive regulation would nearly destroy railroads. By 1917, the 1,500 U.S. railroads operated around 254,000 miles and employed 1.8 million people more than any other industry. Rail mileage had already peaked (in 1916), however, and rail employment would soon (in 1920). 75,000 50,000 25,000 0 1830 1840 1850 1860 1870 1880 1890 1900 1910 1920 A Short History of U.S. Freight Railroads Page 1 of 5

The Great Depression devastated railroads. Rail industry revenue fell by 50 percent from 1928 to 1933. By 1937, more than 70,000 miles of railroad were in receivership, representing around 30 percent of all rail miles. On the eve of World War II, most railroads were in financial trouble. A surge in warrelated traffic brought a temporary reprieve, but by 1949 rail traffic had fallen 28 percent from its 1944 level. Railroads were losing huge amounts of money on passenger operations, but government regulators often refused to allow railroads to discontinue money-losing passenger routes. Throughout the 1950s and 1960s, the rapid growth of truck and barge competition (aided by tens of billions of dollars in federal funding for construction of the interstate highway and inland waterway systems) and huge ongoing losses in passenger operations led to more railroad bankruptcies, service abandonments, and deferred maintenance. Misguided railroad regulation was a major factor behind the rail industry s decline: The ICC set maximum and minimum rates for rail shipments, with rates often unrelated to costs or demand. The ICC generally tried to keep rates low for grain and other bulk commodities at the expense of higher rates for many kinds of manufactured goods that moved in smaller quantities. As a result, many shippers of this higher-rated freight diverted the freight to the highways instead. The concept of open routing added to railroad problems. The rail network was much like a web: a number of possible routes could often be used to move freight between two points. The cost to a railroad of a more circuitous route is generally higher than the costs of a more direct route. However, regulation generally kept rates for routes between two points similar, even if railroads incurred much higher or lower costs to use some routes than others. Because regulation made it so difficult for railroads to adjust individual rates, railroads typically resorted to across-the-board rate increases as their costs rose. This meant that rail rates tended to reflect cost patterns that existed in the past. Subsequent changes in technology and traffic flow that may have significantly altered those cost patterns were often ignored. Sometimes regulation simply made no sense. One infamous example involved Big John cars. In the early 1960s, the Southern Railway asked the ICC for permission to sharply reduce rates for grain shipments using new 100-ton hopper cars. The ICC refused, in part because the lower rates would take business away from more expensive waterways. Only after a U.S. Supreme Court decision in its favor was the Southern Railway able to introduce the new cars. Likewise, regulation delayed the widespread use of unit trains. Unit trains use dedicated, highly efficient sets of 50 or more cars to move freight between two points (for example, between a coal mine and a power plant). However, regulations prevented railroads from offering lower rates to shippers who used unit trains than to shippers who did not. Consequently, it was not profitable for railroads to introduce this innovation until the 1960s, long after it otherwise would have been. A Short History of U.S. Freight Railroads Page 2 of 5

The 1970s: Railroads at the Brink By the 1970s, excessive regulations, intense competition from trucks and barges, and changing shipping patterns drove railroads to the brink of ruin: The Rail Passenger Service Act of 1970 created Amtrak and relieved freight railroads of most of the huge losses (then around $200 million per year, which is around $850 million in today s dollars) incurred in passenger service, but conditions continued to deteriorate on the freight side. During the 1970s, most major railroads in the Northeast and several major Midwestern railroads went bankrupt. Bankrupt railroads accounted for more than 21 percent of the nation s rail mileage. Between 1970 and 1979, the rail industry s return on investment never exceeded 2.9 percent and averaged just 2.0 percent. The rate of return had been falling for decades: it averaged 4.1 percent in the 1940s, 3.7 percent in the 1950s, and 2.8 percent in the 1960s. Railroads lacked the funds to properly maintain their tracks. By 1976, more than 47,000 miles of track had to be operated at reduced speeds because of unsafe conditions. Railroads had billions of dollars in deferred maintenance, and the term standing derailment when railcars that were standing still simply fell off poorly maintained track was often heard. By 1978, the rail share of intercity freight had fallen to 35 percent, down from 75 percent in the 1920s. Oppressive regulation continued to 50% harm the industry. As the U.S. 40% Department of Transportation noted in 1978, The current system of railroad regulation is a hodgepodge 20% 30% of inconsistent and often 10% anachronistic regulations that no 0% longer correspond to the economic Source: AAR condition of the railroads, the nature of intermodal competition, or the often-conflicting needs of shippers, consumers, and taxpayers. The Staggers Rail Act of 1980: Balanced Regulation The status quo was untenable, so Congress essentially had two options: nationalize the railroads, at a continuing cost of untold billions of dollars, or replace the excessive regulation of the past with a more balanced regulatory framework. Congress wisely chose balanced regulation and passed the Staggers Rail Act of 1980. 80% 70% 60% Railroad Share of U.S. Intercity Ton-Miles 1930 1940 1950 1960 1970 1980 By passing Staggers, Congress recognized that railroads faced intense competition for most of their traffic, but excessive regulation prevented them from competing effectively. To survive, railroads needed a new regulatory system that allowed them to act like most other businesses in terms of managing their assets and pricing their services. A Short History of U.S. Freight Railroads Page 3 of 5

The Staggers Act ushered in a new era in which railroads could largely decide for themselves rather than have Washington decide for them what routes to use, what services to offer, and what prices to charge. Railroads were allowed to base their rates on market demand; railroads and shippers could enter into confidential contracts; procedures for abandoning or selling unneeded rail lines were streamlined; and the need for railroads to earn adequate revenues to support their operations was explicitly recognized. Railroads do not have unlimited freedom to charge whatever they want, though. Today, the Surface Transportation Board can, and does, set maximum-allowable rates for rail transportation services where there is no effective competition for those services. The Post-Staggers Era: Railroads are Reborn The more balanced and reasonable regulatory environment created by Staggers has been a great success for rail shippers, railroads, and the public at large: Average rail rates (measured by inflation-adjusted revenue per ton-mile) were 45 percent lower in 2016 than in 1981. This means the average rail shipper can move close to twice as much freight for about the same price it paid more than 35 years ago, saving American consumers hundreds of billions of dollars over the years. America s freight railroads operate almost exclusively on infrastructure that they own, build, maintain, and pay for themselves. By contrast, trucks, airlines, and barges operate on highways, airways, and waterways that are financed by taxpayers. America s freight railroads have spent more than $635 billion since 1980, including record amounts in recent years, to create a freight rail network that is second to none in the world. revenue per ton-mile (2016 $) 7.5 7.0 6.5 6.0 5.5 5.0 4.5 4.0 3.5 3.0 2.5 2.0 Saving Americans Money Average inflation-adjusted U.S. freight rail rates were 45 percent lower in 2016 than they were in 1981.* '83 '86 '89 '92 '95 '98 '01 '04 '07 '10 '13 '16 *Measured by revenue per ton-mile. Source: AAR Record Railroad Spending on Infrastructure & Equipment* ($ billions) $30.3 Freight railroads have been spending record amounts in $28.0 recent years to maintainand improve their infrastructure $25.5 $25.9 and equipment. $25.1 $23.3 $21.5 $20.2 $20.2 $20.7 '07 '08 '09 '10 '11 '12 '13 '14 '15 '16 *Capital spending + maintenance expenses. Data are for Class I railroads. Source: AAR Nothing is more important to railroads than safety, and railroads know that the safety challenge never ends. The train accident rate in 2016 was down 79 percent from 1980 and down 42 percent from 2000; the employee injury rate in 2016 was down 83 percent from 1980 and down 46 percent from 2000; and the grade crossing collision rate in 2016 was down 80 percent from 1980 and down 39 percent from 2000. The train derailment rate, the train collision rate, and the rate of accidents caused by defective track were all the lowest ever in 2016. A Short History of U.S. Freight Railroads Page 4 of 5

In 2016, railroads moved a ton of freight an average of 468 miles per gallon of fuel. Rail fuel efficiency is up 99 percent since 1980. After decades of steady decline, rail market share (measured in ton-miles) has risen since Staggers. Rail productivity gains since Staggers have been among the highest of all U.S. industries. Railroads are stronger financially. Return on net investment, which had been falling for decades, was 4.4 percent in the 1980s, 7.0 percent in the 1990s, and 9.6 percent from 2000 to 2016. Improved rail earnings are a positive development because they allow railroads to make the massive investments needed to keep their networks in top condition, improve service, and add the new rail capacity America will need in the years ahead. Moving More Freight by Rail is Good Public Policy As America s economy grows, the need to move more freight will grow too. Recent forecasts from the Federal Highway Administration found that total U.S. freight shipments will rise from an estimated 18.1 billion tons in 2015 to 25.5 billion tons in 2040 a 41 percent increase. Railroads are the best way to meet this demand, but that can happen only if they have adequate capacity. Railroads will continue to pour huge sums back into their networks, but 300 275 250 225 200 175 150 125 100 75 50 25 Staggers Act passed Oct. 1980 0 '64 '68 '72 '76 '80 '84 '88 '92 '96 '00 '04 '08 '12 '16 "Rates" is inflation-adjusted revenue per ton-mile. "Volume" is ton-miles. "Productivity" is revenue tonmiles per constant dollar operating expense. "Revenue" is operating revenue in 2016 $. Source: AAR 2015e 2020p 2030p 2040p U.S. Freight Railroad Performance Since Staggers (1981 = 100) Since Staggers, railroads have sharply increased their traffic volume, more than doubled their productivity, and cut their average rates nearly in half. Productivity policymakers have a role too. Policymakers can help ensure that America has the rail capacity it needs in the future by retaining today s balanced regulatory system that protects rail customers from unreasonable railroad conduct and unreasonable railroad pricing while giving railroads the freedom to largely decide for themselves how to manage their operations. Policymakers should also implement sound and equitable corporate tax reform that enhances economic development and promotes job growth; enter into public-private partnerships that allow governments to expand the use of freight rail while paying only for the public benefits of a project, with the railroads paying for the benefits accruing to them; and retain existing truck size and weight limits. The taxes and fees heavy trucks pay are far less than the cost of the highway damage that heavy trucks cause. This multi-billion dollar underpayment would become even greater if truck size and weight limits were increased. 18.1 20.2 Rates 22.9 25.5 Volume Revenue Demand For Freight Transportation Will Rise (billions of tons transported in U.S.) The U.S. DOT forecasts that total U.S. freight movements will rise from around 18.1 billion tons in 2015 to around 25.5 billion tons in 2040 a 41% increase. e - estimate p - projected Source: FHWA Office of Freight Management and Operations, Freight Analysis Framework version 4.4 A Short History of U.S. Freight Railroads Page 5 of 5