Asphalt Test Relationships The Devil s In The Details

Similar documents
Importance of identifying trends. Help identify erroneous test results. Quality of pavement Encourage paying attention to test results.

12/9/14. HMA Mix Design. Asphalt Mix Design. Volumetrics. HMA Mix Characteristics

ASPHALT WAQTC WAQTC TM 13 (12)

Foreword... iii Table of Contents...v List of Figures...vii List of Tables...viii. Chapter 1 : Background...1

BACKGROUND Flexible Pavements Part of a Layered/Composite System Elastic Behavior 2

INTRODUCTION TO ASPHALT MATERIALS FOR MANAGERS AND OWNERS ASPHALT PAVEMENT ASSOCIATION OF OREGON

Asphalt 104: An Introduction to Hot Mix Asphalt Materials. -Part II- Mix Design. Scott Shuler CSU

INDIANA. So how do you make hot mix asphalt? Basics of HMA Pavement Performance. Basics of a Good Road Hot Mix Asphalt Pavement Materials Selection

5- Superpave. Asphalt Concrete Mix Design

Superpave Volumetric Mix Design

Improving Hot Mix Asphalt Performance with SUPERPAVE

Acceptance Testing and Variability Impacts on Construction Operation

Classroom Instructors: Mitch Forst (MF), Larry Shively (LS), Cliff Ursich (CU), Dave Powers (DP).

EXPERIENCE WITH SUPERPAVE MIXTURES Construction Conference Robert Lee and Paul Hoelscher

SUPERPAVE FACT SHEET

APPENDIX A DRAFT PERFORMANCE-BASED MIX DESIGN PROCEDURE FOR POROUS FRICTION COURSE

VOLUMETRIC PROPERTIES OF HOT MIX ASPHALT (HMA) WAQTC TM 13

MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION SPECIAL PROVISION FOR SUPERPAVE HMA MIXTURES. C&T:CJB 1 of 5 C&T:APPR:SJP:DBP: FHWA:APPR:

Materials for Civil and Construction Engineers

Reclaimed Asphalt Pavement (RAP)

ASPHALT MIX DESIGNER

CHAPTER 2: HOT MIX DESIGN

Chapter 6 Tex-204-F, Design of Bituminous Mixtures

Special Provision No. 399F02 January 2017 CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION FOR TEMPORARY HOT MIX PAVEMENT

MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION SPECIAL PROVISION FOR FURNISHING AND PLACING MARSHALL HOT MIX ASPHALT MIXTURE (WITH SAMPLING BEHIND THE PAVER)

DESIGN OF BITUMINOUS MIXTURES

Material Test Framework for Warm Mix Asphalt Trials

SPECIAL PROVISION FOR FURNISHING AND PLACING MARSHALL HMA MIXTURE (WITH SAMPLING BEHIND THE PAVER)

Chapter Eight. Minnesota Mix Specifications, Methods & Quality Control

ROARING FORK & EAGLE VALLEY (RFEV) SECTION 4 ASPHALT MIXTURE REQUIRMENTS

Western Canada Pavement Workshop February 1, 2011 PAVING MATERIALS. Past, Present and Future. Gerry Huber Heritage Research Group Indianapolis, IN

Overview. Mix Design with High RAP Contents SEAUPG 2010 ANNUAL CONFERENCE OKLAHOMA CITY, OK. December 7, 2010

Enhanced Durability Through Increased In-Place Pavement Density. FHWA and Asphalt Institute Workshop

Verification of Gyration Levels in the Superpave

Tex-204-F, Design of Bituminous Mixtures

Specifying Asphalt Pavement the ODOT Way

Superpave Mix Design

MARSHALL MIX DESIGN PROJECT. [2 nd semester 1433H] CE432-Highway Engineering LABORATORY

Setting Asphalt Content For Hot Mix Asphalt. Gerry Huber Heritage Research Group

Using RAP in the Superpave Mix Design System

Asphalt Concrete Properties

100 Aggregate Size Definitions Nominal Maximum Agg ggreg re ate Size one size larger than the first sieve to retain more than 10% Maximum

SPECIAL SPECIFICATION 3402 Reflective Crack Relief Interlayer (RCRI)

DESIGN OF BITUMINOUS MIXTURES

A. Provide all labor, materials, and equipment as necessary to complete all work as indicated on the Drawings and specified herein.

Update on WMA Lab Foaming Research. Ala R. Abbas, Ph.D. Ayman W. Ali, M.Sc. Department of Civil Engineering The University of Akron

SUPERPAVE. SUperior PERforming Asphalt PAVEments. History of Hveem Mix Design

SPECIAL SPECIFICATION 3032 Reflective Crack Relief Interlayer (RCRI)

SPECIAL SPECIFICATION 3017 Reflective Crack Relief Interlayer (RCRI)

EFFECT OF AGGREGATE GRADATION ON MEASURED ASPHALT CONTENT

2002 SEAUPG Meeting. Southeastern Asphalt User/Producer Group (SEAUPG) SEAUPG 2002 CONFERENCE FLORIDA FLORIDA. Central Sub-Group

Asphalt Concrete Properties

SUPERPAVE. SUperior PERforming Asphalt PAVEments. History of Hveem Mix Design

Investigation of synergistic efforts of warm mix asphalt and high fractionated reclaimed asphalt for safe, environmentally sustainable highway

Marshal Mix Design. Compacted Specimen Asphalt Content Loose Specimen

ROAD COMMISSION FOR OAKLAND COUNTY SPECIAL PROVISION FOR ACCEPTANCE OF HOT MIXED ASPHALT

4- High-Type Bituminous Pavements

Re: Optimization of Asphalt Cement Content to Improve Durability of Asphalt Mixes

EVALUATION OF BITUMINOUS PAVEMENTS FOR HIGH PRESSURE TRUCK TIRES. Executive Summary & Implementation Plan. NCAT Report 90-02A

Seattle Public Utilities Materials Laboratory

Appendix C Training Materials for the Draft Appendix to AASHTO R 35

PERFROMANCE EVALUATION OF ASPHALT PAVEMENT MIXES IN IDAHO CONTAINING HIGH PERCENTAGES FOR RECYCLED ASPHALT PAVEMENT (RAP)

THIN ASPHALT OVERLAYS FOR PAVEMENT PRESERVATION

THIN ASPHALT OVERLAYS FOR PAVEMENT PRESERVATION

DEVELOPMENT OF A MIXTURE DESIGN PROCEDURE FOR STONE MATRIX ASPHALT (SMA)

HEAVY DUTY ASPHALT PAVEMENTS IN PENNSYLVANIA: AN EVALUATION FOR RUTTING

A Laboratory Study of the Effects of Compaction on the Volumetric and Rutting Properties of CRM Asphalt Mixtures

INVESTIGATION OF THE DESIGN OF ASPHALT PAVING MIXTURES USING MINNESOTA TACONITE ROCK

ITEM 404LVT (Low Volume Traffic) ASPHALT CONCRETE Revised June 5, 2015

2501 PART V SECTION 2501 PART V

DIVISION 2500 MISCELLANEOUS METHODS OF TEST

Thin Hot Mix Asphalt Overlays

Review 2014 HMA test data Review Changes to CS 409 (2015) Discuss 2015 Bit DEL changes Protocol for Reheating HMA Samples Verification Data 2014 /

SECTION 329 PLANT MIXED SEAL COAT CONSTRUCTION

Evaluation of Warm Mix Asphalt Technologies

Mix Design & Production Control Recertification. Quality Control / Quality Assurance

May 2004 Glossary G-1. -Acronyms-

DIVISION 2500 MISCELLANEOUS METHODS OF TEST

Special Provision No. 335S03 April 2015

POROUS PAVEMENTS. - Advantage Asphalt - APWA Spring Conference April 2016

2016 Local Roads Workshop Selecting the Right Mix for Your Project MICHIGAN RIDES ON US

AMENDMENT TO OPSS 313, MARCH 1993 AND OPSS 1149, MARCH Special Provision No. 103F34 March 2006

A comparison of the engineering properties of gap-graded and well-graded road bituminous mixtures

KANSAS DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION SPECIAL PROVISION TO THE STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS, EDITION 2007

KANSAS DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION SPECIAL PROVISION TO THE STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS, EDITION 2007

Reducing Mix Designs: Using a Single N design. Brian D. Prowell, PhD, PE

2015 ACEC HMA Update. Kevin Kennedy HMA Operations Engineer Michigan Department of Transportation

Superpave5: Constructing Asphalt Pavement with Road Air Voids Equal to Design Air Voids

Volumetric Analysis-Based Comparison between Superpave and Marshall Mix Design Procedures

Superpave5. Asphalt Paving Conference Kansas University December 3, 2015

IN SEARCH OF THE TRUE N-DESIGN

INFLUENCE OF MINERAL FILLER ON VOLUMETRIC PROPERTIES OF HOT MIX ASPHALT

Fine-Graded Mixes. Illinois Asphalt Pavement Association Annual Meeting. March 8, Bill Pine Emulsicoat, Inc. / Heritage Research Group

Effects of RAP in HMA: Lab Study. Jo Sias Daniel Asst. Professor

CHAPTER 2 ASPHALT CONCRETE MIXTURES

Laboratory Evaluation of Honeywell Polymer vs SBS Polymer Modified Asphalt Mixtures

SEAUPG 2004 Conference - Baton Rouge Presented By Dr. Louay Mohammad, LSU

Thinlay Definition Production Moisture Cold Feed Construction Tack Coat Paver Operation Compaction Temperature

Appendix E NCHRP Project Experimental Plans, Results, and Analyses

Presented December 7, 2011 Bituminous Paving Conference I Hotel, Urbana, IL

Transcription:

Asphalt Test Relationships The Devil s In The Details Jayson Jordan, PE Technical Director jjordan@scasphalt.org

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT & DISCLAIMER: Rocky Mountain Asphalt Education Center

First Things First Show of hands: SCDOT Asphalt Certified? Roadway, Level 1, Level 2, Level 3

What is SCAPA? The South Carolina Asphalt Pavement Association Its membership is comprised of asphalt pavement producers and companies affiliated with the asphalt pavement industry in South Carolina.

What is SCAPA? Created in 1966 by 10 Founding Members In 50 Years, SCAPA has only had 3 Executive Directors Ogden Babson (1966-1999) David Herndon, PhD (1999-2011) Ashley Batson, Esq (2011-current) In 2014, SCAPA expanded staff, hired Technical Director Ogden Babson

Together We Know More SCAPA participates in various research and educational programs to develop an even better product, new paving techniques, and higher quality workmanship

Focus on Education & Training Asphalt Pavement Design Guide for Low Volumes and Parking Lots 2014: Volume 1 2016: Volume 2 (NOW!) Lunch and Learn Opportunities (PDHs) SCAPA Design Guide PaveXpress Workshop And many more! Assists with SCDOT Certification Asphalt Courses

www.scasphalt.org SCAPA Asphalt Pavement Design Guide Asphalt Pavement Alliance Publications SCDOT/SCAPA Best Practices Documents SC Asphalt Index PaveXpress Conference Materials & Presentations

Paving The Way: SCAPA s E-Newsletter News and Events Industry News Asphalt Resources NCAT Reports NAPA Publications Calendar of Events Asphalt Facts

Upcoming Events SAVE THE DATES 2018 SCAPA Winter Conference January 29 th Tradeshow Reception January 30 th Winter Conference Columbia Metropolitan Convention Center, Columbia, SC Overlay Design Guide Seminars

Follow Us on Social Media @SCAsphaltPavement @SCAPAtweets @SCasphalt

Boogity Boogity Boogity

Asphalt Test Relationships The Devil s In The Details!

Details Matter!

Details Matter!

Details Matter Jayson R. Jordan Jason G. Jordan

Test Results Relationships What do we mean by Test Result Relationships? What are they? Why is it important to be able to identify trends in test results? What types of things can affect test results?

Test Results Relationships Accurate, Repeatable, and Comparable Consistency SCDOT has Percent Within Limits specification Pay Factors 30%: Percent Asphalt Content 25%: Percent Air Voids 10%: Percent VMA 35%: In-Place Density

Test Results Relationships Aggregates Binder or Asphalt Content VMA Rice Values Maximum Specific Gravity Compaction Temperatures Air Voids

Other Key Factors Specific Gravity of aggregates individual/combined Short Term Aging Gradation of mix (samples)

Asphalt Tests

Asphalt Content Measure weight of basket and sample prior to test Basket is placed in oven at a temperature of 1000º F + 18 ºF Oven prints ticket with percent loss The asphalt burned off during the test represents the asphalt content (in percentage of total weight)

Gradation Main reason why we are sampling our aggregates. Sieve analysis gives us our gradation. Typically we are interested in the percent passing any given sieve. We compare gradation to Job Mix Formula

Rice Test or Maximum Specific Gravity Take 1500-2000 g of loose sample and spread on non absorptive paper. Break up any clumps of asphalt by hand. Allow sample to cool to room temperature Measure weights of sample and bowls dry. Place 77 F ± 1.8 F water in bowl, submerge sample, apply vacuum (min 27 Hg) for 15 minutes After vacuuming, place sample in 77 F ± 1.8 F water bath for 10 minutes. Measure the underwater weight. MSG DryWeight DryWeight WetWeight

HMA Test Result Relationships Binder Content and Rice Value (Theoretical Maximum Specific Gravity)

Binder and Rice Relationship

Binder Content vs MSG 2.460 2.455 2.450 y = -0.0085x + 2.4937 R² = 0.05 2.445 2.440 2.435 2.430 2.425 2.420 5.10 5.20 5.30 5.40 5.50 5.60 5.70 5.80 5.90 6.00 Measured Predicted Linear (Measured) Linear (Measured) Linear (Predicted)

Binder Content & Rice Summary of Test Relationships: As the asphalt content increases, the rice value will decrease. As the asphalt content decreases, the rice value will increase. Discuss!

Binder Content, Rice Value (MSG) Does the GRADATION of a sample affect the results for Asphalt Binder Content or Rice? Affects AC content. Affects Rice value results.

How does Gradation affect Test Coarse sample will result in a lower AC content. Fine sample will result in a higher AC content. **Remember the trend of AC versus Rice (MSG).** Due to splitting (sampling)? A too coarse or too fine gradation will also affect the rice results. If the gradation is unrepresentative, then the rice result on that sample is not going to be correct to be used on the roadway!

HMA Test Result Relationships High Asphalt Binder Content Low Asphalt Binder Content

Low Binder Contents Dryness / raveling Impermeability Oxidation Fatigue Cracking Lack of compaction Flexibility Durability

High Binder Contents Durability Stability Rutting Flushing Bleeding

High and Low Asphalt Content Test Result Relationships Low asphalt content = high air voids Low asphalt content = higher maximum specific gravity (rice) High asphalt content = low air voids High asphalt content = lower maximum specific gravity (rice) Discuss, Explain

Summary Low %AC Higher % AirVoids Higher Ricevalue High %AC Lower % AirVoids Lower Ricevalue

HMA Test Result Relationships Rice (Theoretical Maximum Specific Gravity)/Maximum Density and Roadway Density

Rice Value and Density

Rice Value and Density Percent compaction is actually telling us the percent of air voids in the mat. In order to have a durable long lasting pavement, there needs to be between 8 & 4% air voids (92% - 96% compaction). Hence, the need for accurate rice values to monitor the compactive effort. AND AIR VOIDS! AND VMA!

Rice Value and Density Example: Field Spec Grav. of 2.380 (nuclear gauge) / 2.507 (Mix Design)= 94.9% Field SG of 2.380 (nuclear gauge) / 2.482 (New Target Rice) = 95.9% Wet Density: (convert Spec. Grav to wet density- 62.4 x SG) 148.5 / 156.4 (Mix Design) = 94.9% 148.5 / 154.9 (adjusted New Target) = 95.9%

Rice Value & Density If Rice or MSG not representative of the mix being placed: Causes either an over or under compacted mat. Calculated percent compaction becomes just a number that is not accurate or a true reflection of the density of the mat. What happens to the Pavement Quality? Over compaction can lead to rutting, flushing or bleeding, resulting in a shortened pavement life and even dangerous driving conditions. Under compaction can lead to pavement susceptibility to moisture and air damage, shortening the life & durability of the road 70% of your Lot Pay Factor (In-Place Density, AV, VMA) hinges on accurate MSG results!

Rice Value & Density Summary of Test Relationship Using a rice value that is too high will result in a calculated density that is actually lower than what the density of the roadway really is. This could result in over compaction of the mat. Using a rice that is too low will result in a calculated density that is actually higher than what the density of the roadway really is. This could result in under compaction of the mat.

Correction Factors In Nuclear Gauges Correction Factors to correlate nuclear gauge to the mat result in more accurate density test results

Correction Factors In Nuclear Gauges Check the settings in the gauge MA for Asphalt Correct maximum density input into the gauge. Using the correct Correctiong Factor? Correction Factors correlate gauges to mat for accurate compaction.

HMA Test Result Relationships Air Voids and Gradation

Volumetric Calculations VMA & Air voids, most important mix properties being measured in process control testing (all based on physical tests) Complying with volumetric criteria is great assurance the mixture will be long lasting & well performing HMA pavement. SOON: PERFORMANCE TESTS! Also, along with quality comes incentive pay.

VMA Change in Rice value may indicate a change in the Bulk Specific Gravity of the Aggregate. When the Rice value changes, the VMA changes, but still has to meet the minimum specified requirements. VMA what is it and how does it affect the durability of the pavement? VFA what is it?

Air Voids and Gradations The durability of an asphalt pavement is a function of the air void content. Air voids = compaction = durability Aggregate gradation is what makes the strong stone skeleton to enhance resistance to permanent deformation and allows for sufficient void space to enhance mixture durability.

Voids and Gradation High % of 200 (esp. natural sands) = low % air voids in the compacted specimen. Addition of Crusher Fines (minus 3/8 angular shape) can increase VMA. Aggregate texture & shape also play into void content. Sampling, splitting & testing procedures.

Gradation and VMA VMA is affected by gradation Greater VMA values for smaller Nominal Max Aggregate size (greater intergranular void space) Leads to more about aggregate absorption and the importance of the aging process

Absorption of Binder Affected By: Viscosity of binder Aggregate type /pore size Time Temperatures

Fix SC Roads Contact Your Politician

HMA Test Result Relationships What Affects A Rice Value?

What Affects a Rice Value Sampling Splitting Temperatures Testing equipment Cure times for aggregate absorption

Cure Times of the Mix Standard practice for cure times or aging periods is 2 hours @ compaction temperature SC T 98: Determination of HMA Properties from HMA Contractor Plant Produced Mixtures Using Hot or Reheated Samples SC T 103: Field Procedure for Preparing Gyratory Specimens on Hot Mix Asphalt Mixtures Using the Gyratory Compactor

Mix Aging Aged Expected percent of asphalt binder has absorbed into the aggregate. Not aged At time of testing, asphalt binder still coating outside of aggregate, but will be lost due to absorption.

HMA Test Result Relationships The Importance of Monitoring Temperature During Compaction

Temperature & Compaction Even a good mix, if not compacted properly will not. result in a long lasting durable asphalt pavement

Temperature & Compaction As binder cools it becomes stiffer and bonds the aggregates to provide a durable structure.

Temperature & Compaction The temperature of a mix is perhaps the most important property in obtaining density Temperature Viscosity charts! Obtaining density is perhaps the most important process for a durable, long lasting asphalt pavement

Conclusion Even a good mix that meets all the mix design criteria in the lab has to be properly compacted to have an end result of a durable, long life pavement. BEST PRACTICES!

Longitudinal Joints Best Practices!

Thank You! jjordan@scasphalt.org