MONITORING QUESTIONS AND TASKS FOR THE GEORGE WASHINGTON PLAN

Similar documents
White Mountain National Forest. Chapter 4 Monitoring and Evaluation

Grandfather Restoration Project

National Forests in Alabama Revised Land and Resource Management Plan Administrative Change 2012 Planning Rule Monitoring Program Transition May 2016

Sustainable Recreation

Kawa Ng, Regional Economist US Forest Service Rocky Mountain Region Headquarter. Golden, CO

Clarks Fork of the Yellowstone Comprehensive River Management Plan

File Code: 1950 Date: September 13, 2017

The Monongahela National Forest

White Spruce Assessment Public Scoping Package

USDA defers to the Department of the Interior regarding the impact of the legislation on the Department s programs and authorities.

Flathead National Forest Assessment

SKIBO PROJECT SCOPING REPORT Laurentian Ranger District, Superior National Forest

3-13 Other Required Findings and Regulatory Compliance

CATEGORICAL EXCLUSION WORKSHEET: RESOURCE CONSIDERATIONS

SUSTAINABLE FORESTRY INITIATIVE

Wildlife Conservation Strategy

J. ROADLESS 1. INTRODUCTION 2. REGULATORY FRAMEWORK 3. AREA OF ANALYSIS

Decision Memo Cow Pen Project. USDA Forest Service Talladega National Forest - Oakmulgee District Bibb and Tuscaloosa Counties, Alabama

Forest Stewardship Program

1/26/17. Senator Susan Glick Chair, Senate Natural Resources Committee 200 W. Washington St. Indianapolis, IN RE: SB420. Dear Senator Glick,

Sustainable Non-Agriculture Land Management

Reduce Hazardous Fuels in the McKenzie Bridge Wildland-Urban Interface (WUI)

Nez Perce National Forest Moose Creek Ranger District

3.28 RESEARCH NATURAL AREAS

Forest Stewardship Management Plan

Rio Grande National Forest Update

Supervisor s Office 5162 Valleypointe Parkway Roanoke, VA

File Code: 1900 Date: June 14, Dear Interested Parties,

Forest Plan Monitoring Program Frequently Asked Questions

Agency Organization Organization Address Information. Name United States Department of Agriculture

I am posting this letter, along with maps on the National Forests in North Carolina website, at:

Post-Fire BAER Assessment Burned Area Emergency Response (BAER)

NEW Vision 2020 CFLRP Work Plan Template 2012

Dear Interested Party:

Ochoco, Umatilla, Wallowa-Whitman National Forests; Oregon and Washington; Blue Mountains

Lakeview Stewardship CFLRP Work Plan 2012

Short-term Uses and Long-term Productivity

Indiana Department of Natural Resources Division of Forestry 2017 SFI Forest Management Public Summary Audit Report

Treatment/Project Area: Blanco Basin

Bear River Planning Unit. Fish, Plant, and Wildlife Habitat BEAR RIVER PLANNING UNIT

The Galton Project Kootenai National Forest. The Galton Project

Supervisor s Office 5162 Valleypointe Parkway Roanoke, VA 24019

BLM Office: Lakeview District, Klamath Falls Resource Area Phone #:

File Code: 1950 Date: November 17, 2015

Pros and Cons of Salvage and Restoration Operations

Appendix B. WOODPECKER DESIGN CRITERIA

CHAPTER 1 PURPOSE AND NEED. Introduction

FOREST, WETLANDS AND HABITAT

Fontana Project Scoping Record August 2013

The management priority in this area is to continue to provide these multiple benefits while minimizing user conflicts.

Forest Bats: Population Trends, Regulatory Developments, and Implications. NCASI Northern Regional Meeting May 2014

The Marsh Project: An Ecosystem Services Approach to NEPA Project Planning

SOCIO-ECOLOGICAL RESEARCH TOPICS FOR THE BLUE MOUNTAINS

DECISION MEMO. Wildlife Habitat Improvement Project Wildlife Opening Construction, Rehabilitation and Expansion FY

Planning for Growth and Open Space Conservation

ROADLESS AREA CONSERVATION: NATIONAL FOREST SYSTEM LANDS IN COLORADO, Proposed rule Regulatory Impact Analysis And Cost-Benefit Analysis

Caring for the Land and Serving People

Monongahela National Forest. 30-Day Notice & Comment Period. Big Mountain

DECISION MEMO POT MOUNTAIN TRAIL CONSTRUCTION USDA

Rogue Basin Ecological Integrity Assessment and Climate Change Management Interactions

AVALONIA LAND CONSERVANCY FEE LAND STEWARDSHIP PRINCIPLES

Hemlock Landscape Restoration: Noxious Weeds Assessment. Eric Vane Forester, Calaveras Ranger District

The Cool Soda Experience

Proposed Action Blue Spring West Project Conecuh National Forest

NATIONAL STREAM AND AQUATIC ECOLOGY CENTER

NSF International Forestry Program Public Summary Audit Report The Summit Bechtel Reserve

DECISION MEMO Eureka Fire Whitebark Pine Planting

San Gabriel Mountains National Monument Need to Change Analysis June 2015

April 2, Lloyd McGee, President Northeast Washington Forestry Coalition 565 West 5 th Colville, Washington 99114

Mt. Elizabeth Drive Fuel Reduction Project (30422) Decision Memo

Reading Project Noxious Weed Risk Assessment Hat Creek Ranger District Lassen National Forest April 3, 2013

Tim Hayden, Yurok Tribe Natural Resources Division Mat Millenbach, Western Rivers Conservancy Sarah Beesley, Yurok Tribal Fisheries Program

RGNF / 3 rd Party Consultant Meeting June 23, 2011

DECISION RECORD for the Rattlesnake Negotiated Timber Sale (Reference:

14. Sustainable Forestry Principals

Balancing Stewardship and Recreation in Montgomery County Parks

Land and Resource Management Plan

Enhancing Habitat for Early Successional Species

3.1 Forest Vegetation and Wildlife Habitat

Q&A: Omineca spruce beetle outbreak May 4, 2018

Inventoried Roadless and Unroaded Areas

Environmental Assessment

Assessing and Adapting to Climate Change Intermountain Region. Natalie Little Forest Service Ogden, Utah

FOREST SERVICE MANUAL NATIONAL HEADQUARTERS (WO) WASHINGTON, DC

Proposed Action and Alternatives

NATIONAL FOREST SYSTEM ROAD MANAGEMENT STRATEGY. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT and Civil Rights Impact Analysis

ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT

West Branch LeClerc Creek Watershed Restoration Project Environmental Assessment

General Description WOLF CREEK PASS LINKAGE LANDSCAPE ZOOLOGICAL AREA. Proposed Designated Area Rio Grande National Forest Divide Ranger District

Dear Interested Party,

APPENDIX B Letters from Other Agencies

FSM 2000 NATIONAL FOREST RESOURCE MANAGEMENT ZERO CODE 2080 NOXIOUS WEED MANAGEMENT

Region 8 Southern Region George Washington and Jefferson National Forest Clinch Ranger District

The National Fire Plan: Managing the Impacts of Wildfires on Communities and the Environment. An Overview and Look Ahead

2012 PLANNING RULE MONITORING PROGRAM EVALUATION REPORT Kisatchie National Forest

Western Governors Association Policy Resolution Wildland Fire Management and Resilient Landscapes A. BACKGROUND

Appendix J. Forest Plan Amendments. Salvage Recovery Project

Summary. Proposed Action. Purpose and Need. Decision to be Made

Upper Applegate Road Hazardous Fuel Reduction Project

NEPA Template for White Bark Pine (WBP) Projects 11 March 2014

Transcription:

MONITORING QUESTIONS AND TASKS FOR THE GEORGE WASHINGTON PLAN MONITORING THEME 1 CONSERVATION OF BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY FOR ECOSYSTEMS MQ 1: How are ecological conditions maintaining or making progress toward the Plan desired conditions and objectives? MT 2. Status and trend in the extent and condition of ecosystems MT 31. Trends in fire regimes and effects on fire dependent communities in Wilderness MQ 2: What are the current condition and trend of key characteristics for vegetation identified in the desired conditions for the Plan area? MT 3. Acres of silvicultural treatments implemented by activity type and forest type MT 4. Acres burned (wildfire and prescribed fire) by forest type and season of burn compared to desired fire regimes MQ 3: How are management actions maintaining or making progress toward desired conditions for the key characteristics of vegetation in the Plan area? MT 3. Acres of silvicultural treatments implemented by activity type and forest type MT 4. Acres burned (wildfire and prescribed fire) by forest type and season of burn compared to desired fire regimes MT 7. Acreage of existing and potential old growth by forest community class MT 8. Trends in hard mast production capability MT 46. Are lands being adequately restocked within 5 years of regeneration treatments? [36 CFR 219.27(c)(3)] MT 47. Are lands not suited for timber production classified as such? [36 CFR 219.12(k)5(ii)] Have lands identified as not suitable for timber production become suitable? [36 CFR 219.14 (a)(d)], 36 CFR 219.27(c)(1)] MT 48. Are harvest unit sizes within the allowable limits? [36 CFR 219.12(k)5(iii)] Should maximum harvest unit size limits be continued? [36 CFR 219.27(d)] MT 49. Are appropriate harvest methods used on the Forest? [36 CFR 219.27] MONITORING THEME 1 CONSERVATION OF BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY FOR SPECIES MQ 4: How are ecological conditions for selected T&E species, sensitive, or locally rare species maintaining or making progress toward the LMP desired conditions and objectives? MT 1. Trends in the conditions of Special Biological Areas MT 6. How many acres of high-elevation early successional habitats exist and what are the trends in their abundance and condition MT 9. Abundance of snags and downed wood MT 16. Population status of shale barren rock cress and progress towards recovery [MIS - 36 MT 17. Population status of James spinymussel and progress towards recovery [MIS - 36 CFR

MT 18. Population status of Virginia big-eared bat and progress towards recovery [MIS - 36 MT 19. Population status of Indiana bat and progress towards recovery [MIS - 36 CFR MT 20. Population status of northeastern bulrush and progress towards recovery [MIS - 36 MT 21. Population status of Virginia sneezeweed and progress towards recovery [MIS - 36 MT 22. Population status of swamp pink and progress towards recovery [MIS - 36 CFR MT 23. Population status of smooth coneflower and progress towards recovery [MIS - 36 MT 24. Population status of Virginia northern flying squirrel and progress towards recovery [MIS - 36 MT 54. Presence/absence of golden-winged warblers in suitable habitats MT 55. Presence/absence of cerulean warblers in suitable habitats MQ 5: How are management actions for the recovery of T&E species, conservation of sensitive, and management of locally rare achieving LMP objectives? MT 1. Trends in the conditions of Special Biological Areas MT 6. How many acres of high-elevation early successional habitats exist and what are the trends in their abundance and condition MT 9. Abundance of snags and downed wood MT 16. Population status of shale barren rock cress and progress towards recovery [MIS - 36 MT 17. Population status of James spinymussel and progress towards recovery [MIS - 36 CFR MT 18. Population status of Virginia big-eared bat and progress towards recovery [MIS - 36 MT 19. Population status of Indiana bat and progress towards recovery [MIS - 36 CFR MT 20. Population status of northeastern bulrush and progress towards recovery [MIS - 36 MT 21. Population status of Virginia sneezeweed and progress towards recovery [MIS - 36 MT 22. Population status of swamp pink and progress towards recovery [MIS - 36 CFR MT 23. Population status of smooth coneflower and progress towards recovery [MIS - 36 MT 24. Population status of Virginia northern flying squirrel and progress towards recovery [MIS - 36 MT 54. Presence/absence of golden-winged warblers in suitable habitats MT 55. Presence/absence of cerulean warblers in suitable habitats MQ 6: How are changes in Management Indicator Species and the relationship to their habitats reflecting the effectiveness of management activities in achieving desired conditions and objectives?

MT 5. Trends in MIS populations in relationship to the ecological system/condition MIS was selected to indicate MT 25. Trends in harvest data for demand MIS in relationship to habitat improvement activities for those animals [MIS - 36 MONITORING THEME 2 MAINTENANCE OF LAND HEALTH AND VITALITY RELATED TO INVASIVE SPECIES MQ 7: What are the status and trends of areas infested by aquatic and terrestrial invasive species on the unit s plan area relative to the desired condition? MQ 8: How effective were our management activities including partnerships in preventing or controlling targeted invasive species (some of which may be Species of Interest)? MONITORING THEME 2 MAINTENANCE OF LAND HEALTH AND VITALITY RELATED TO FIRE DISTURBANCE MQ 9: What is the distribution and trend in Fire Regime Condition Class on the National Forest? MT 14. Conditions and trends of forest fuels and acres of fuels treated through the use of wildland fire and mechanical treatment MQ 10: How effective are management actions in moving the National Forest toward FRCC 1? MT 14. Conditions and trends of forest fuels and acres of fuels treated through the use of wildland fire and mechanical treatment MONITORING THEME 2 MAINTENANCE OF LAND HEALTH AND VITALITY RELATED TO NATIVE INSECTS AND PATHOGENS MQ 11: What are the status and trends of outbreaks of native insects and pathogens on the National Forest? MQ 12: What are the trends in areas at risk to future outbreaks of native insects and pathogens on the National Forest?

MONITORING THEME 3 CONSERVATION AND MAINTENANCE OF SOIL, WATER AND AIR RESOURCES FOR WATERSHED HEALTH MQ 13: What is the ecological condition and trend of watershed health, including the aquatic ecosystem potential, for watersheds identified in the desired condition and/or objectives of the plan area? MT 10. Conditions and trends in the overall health of streams including trends in water quality parameters and physical habitat conditions in relationship to aquatic communities MT 11. Trends in presence and abundance of wild trout in relation to acidification of stream systems and the application of mitigating measures MT 32. Trends in air quality related values in Class 1 Wilderness areas [36 CFR 219.27(a)(12)] MT 12. Trends in air pollution effects on forest soil and vegetation MT 13. Trends in air pollutants (ozone, fine particulates, and acid deposition) MT 35. Condition and trend of chemical resilience of watersheds across the Forest as indicated by chemical parameters MQ 14: How effective are management actions in moving the National Forest toward improving watershed health? MT 10. Conditions and trends in the overall health of streams including trends in water quality parameters and physical habitat conditions in relationship to aquatic communities MT 11. Trends in presence and abundance of wild trout in relation to acidification of stream systems and the application of mitigating measures MT 32. Trends in air quality related values in Class 1 Wilderness areas [36 CFR 219.27(a)(12)] MT 12. Trends in air pollution effects on forest soil and vegetation MT 13. Trends in air pollutants (ozone, fine particulates, and acid deposition) MT 35. Condition and trend of chemical resilience of watersheds across the Forest as indicated by chemical parameters MT 36. Effect of management activities on soil quality and productivity [36 CFR 219.12(k)(2), 36 CFR 219.27(a)(1)] MT 37. Are temporary roads being revegetated within 10 years of contract or permit termination? [36 CFR 219.27(a)(11)] MT 42. Are roads being maintained, constructed or reconstructed to reduce sediment delivery to water bodies and to provide a transportation system that supplies safe and efficient access for forest users while protecting forest resources? [36 CFR 219.27 (a)(10)] MT 38. Are State BMPs and Forest Standards being implemented to protect and maintain soil and water resources? [36 CFR 219.27(a)(4), 36 CFR 219.12(k)(2)] MT 39. Are Standards (BMPs) Effective minimizing non-point source pollution? MT 41. Are livestock management systems and improvements adequately protecting riparian areas and aquatic habitats? MQ 15: Are timber management systems implemented in a manner to assure they do not substantially and permanently impair the productivity of the land? MT 46. Are lands being adequately restocked within 5 years of regeneration treatments? [36 CFR 219.27(c)(3)] MT 47. Are lands not suited for timber production classified as such? [36 CFR 219.12(k)5(ii)] Have lands identified as not suitable for timber production become suitable? [36 CFR 219.14 (a)(d), 36 CFR 219.27(c)(1)]

MT 48. Are harvest unit sizes within the allowable limits? [36 CFR 219.12(k)5(iii)] Should maximum harvest unit size limits be continued? [36 CFR 219.27(d)] MT 49. Are appropriate harvest methods used on the Forest? [36 CFR 219.27] MONITORING THEME 4 MAINTENANCE AND ENHANCEMENT OF SOCIAL AND ECONOMIC SYSTEMS MQ 16: What is the status and trend of settings and opportunities provided by the NFS unit compared to Desired Conditions stated in the LMP? MT 26. Results and trends in user satisfaction ratings [36 CFR 219.21(a)] MT 30. Is wilderness visitor use within limits that do not impair the values for which the wilderness was established? [36 CFR 219.18(a)] MT 27. Are semi-primitive recreation settings and backcountry recreation opportunities maintained or increased? MT 33. Acres of National Forest land that meet or exceed established scenic quality objectives [36 CFR 219.27(c)(6), 36 CFR 219.27(d)(1)] MQ 17: How are management actions maintaining or improving Desired Conditions for settings and opportunities provided by the NFS unit, including contributions to sustaining social systems within the unit s LMP analysis area? MT 26. Results and trends in user satisfaction ratings [36 CFR 219.21(a)] MT 33. Acres of National Forest land that meet or exceed established scenic quality objectives [36 CFR 219.27(c)(6), 36 CFR 219.27(d)(1)] MT 27. Are semi-primitive recreation settings and backcountry recreation opportunities maintained or increased? MT 30. Is wilderness visitor use within limits that do not impair the values for which the wilderness was established? [36 CFR 219.18(a)] MT 34. Are heritage sites being identified for protection? Are protection measures effective? [36 CFR 219.24(a)(4)] MQ 18: How do people involved in the adaptive planning process interpret settings and opportunities provided by the NFS unit compared with Desired Conditions? Do they think there is a need for change? MT 44. Are National Forest System lands being managed to improve management effectiveness and enhance public benefits? MT 45. How do estimated and actual costs of plan implementation compare? [36 CFR 219.12(k)3] MQ 19: What are the status and trends of goods and services provided from the unit with regards to progress towards desired conditions? MT 40. Are forest products being produced within predicted ranges? [36 CFR 219.27 (c)(2)] MT 43. Were special use authorizations processed in a timely manner? MT 44.Are National Forest System lands being managed to improve management effectiveness and enhance public benefits? MQ 20: How do these goods and services contribute to key opportunities for sustaining economic systems relevant to the plan area?

MT 40. Are forest products being produced within predicted ranges? [36 CFR 219.27 (c)(2)] MT 43. Were special use authorizations processed in a timely manner? MT 28. Are motorized and nonmotorized trails being maintained? MQ 26: What changes are occurring in the social, cultural, and economic conditions in the areas influenced by national forests in the region? This monitoring question will be addressed and evaluated through the Region 8 Broader- Scale Monitoring Strategy, which the Forest will incorporate into the Forest Evaluation Reports. To see the indicators and procedures that will be used at the broader-scale for this monitoring question, see the Region 8 s Broader-Scale Monitoring Strategy at www.fs.usda.gov/main/r8/landmanagement/planning. MONITORING THEME 6 INFRASTRUCTURE CAPACITY MQ 21: How many miles of the designated roads and trails meet standard? MT 28. Are motorized and nonmotorized trails being maintained? MQ 22: Where is unauthorized use occurring on or off the road and trail system and is unauthorized use increasing or decreasing? MT 29. Where is unauthorized use occurring? MQ 23: Are the impacts from the road and trail system on soils, water quality, wildlife, and other natural and cultural resources sustainable and within acceptable tolerance? MT 28. Are motorized and nonmotorized trails being maintained? MT 37. Are temporary roads being revegetated within 10 years of contract or permit termination? [36 CFR 219.27(a)(11)] MT 42. Are roads being maintained, constructed or reconstructed to reduce sediment delivery to water bodies and to provide a transportation system that supplies safe and efficient access for forest users while protecting forest resources. [36 CFR 219.27 (a)(10)] MQ 24: Is the road and trail system serving its intended purposes and addressing recreational demands? MT 26. Results and trends in user satisfaction ratings [36 CFR 219.21(a)] CLIMATE CHANGE MQ 25: What is the impact of climate change on the planning area? MT 1. Trends in the conditions of Special Biological Areas MT 5. Trends in MIS populations in relationship to the ecological system/condition MIS was selected to indicate MT 6. How many acres of high-elevation early successional habitats exist and what are the trends in their abundance and condition

MT 10. Conditions and trends in the overall health of streams including trends in water quality parameters and physical habitat conditions in relationship to aquatic communities MT 11. Trends in presence and abundance of wild trout in relation to acidification of stream systems and the application of mitigating measures MT 32. Trends in air quality related values in Class 1 Wilderness areas [36 CFR 219.27(a)(12)] MT 12. Trends in air pollution effects on forest soil and vegetation MT 13. Trends in air pollutants (ozone, fine particulates, and acid deposition) MT 35. Condition and trend of chemical resilience of watersheds across the Forest as indicated by chemical parameters The following three monitoring questions will be addressed and evaluated through the Region 8 Broader-Scale Monitoring Strategy, which the Forest will incorporate into the Forest Evaluation Reports. To see the indicators and procedures that will be used at the broader-scale for these monitoring questions, see the Region 8 s Broader-Scale Monitoring Strategy at www.fs.usda.gov/main/r8/landmanagement/planning. MQ 27: How has climate variability changed and how is it projected to change across the region? MQ 28: How is climate variability and change influencing the ecological, social, and economic conditions and contributions provided by plan areas in the region? MQ 29: What effects do national forests in the region have on a changing climate?

2024 © businessdocbox.com Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Feedback