Wetland Compensation Plan

Similar documents
Wetlands, Flood Control and Ecosystem Services in the Smith Creek Drainage Basin: A Case Study in Saskatchewan. John K. Pattison-Williams, PhD, PAg

GLASI GLASI. Priority Subwatershed Project. Great Lakes Agricultural Stewardship Initiative

2015 Reinvest in Minnesota (RIM) Reserve Wetlands Program

BASELINE DOCUMENTATION REPORT

Conservation Partners Legacy Grant Program Annual Accomplishment Report Form

Attachment C Applicant s Proposed Mitigation Statement Alaska DOT&PF Northern Region Pilot Station Airport Relocation Project POA

Swan Lake Wetland Mitigation: Restoration/Enhancement Concept Ducks Unlimited Canada August 2017

MN CREP CP23 and CP23A

SECTION 10: WETLANDS PROTECTION

Rainwater Basin Joint Venture Water Plan

Wetland Restoration in Alberta

Chapter 12 Water Security Agency Regulating Drainage 1.0 MAIN POINTS

FACT SHEET. Alberta Wetland Policy Implementation in the White Area Agriculture April Purpose of this Document. What is a Wetland?

Former cornfield, Bear Creek Wetland Mitigation Bank, LaGrange, North Carolina

Prairie Hydrological Model Study Progress Report, April 2008

Operating and Reclamation Plan

Public Notice ISSUED: May 21, 2013 EXPIRES: June 20, 2013

A Proposed Regulation under The Water Rights Act

PROSPECTUS. Proposed Beech River Canal Wetland and Stream Mitigation Bank

A Holistic Approach to. Wetland Ecosystem Restoration. and Stewardship

BLOCKING AND FILLING SURFACE DRAINAGE DITCHES

Environment and Natural Resources Trust Fund 2019 Request for Proposals (RFP)

Manitoba: Provincial Policy and Regulation Overview

North Saskatchewan River Watershed Goals, Issues, Threats and 5 Year Workplan November 2013

Whatcom County Farm Plan

WHATCOM COUNTY STANDARD FARM CONSERVATION PLAN PLANNING WORKBOOK: Checklist and Action Plan

Riparian Buffer Requirements. Department of Environmental Protection Bureau of Watershed Management

Papua New Guinea LNG Project. Environmental and Social Management Plan Appendix 11: Reinstatement Management Plan PGGP-EH-SPENV

RECLAMATION PLAN FOR. (name of Mine) MINING OPERATION

Please print or type.

The Impact of Wetland Drainage on the Hydrology of a Northern Prairie Watershed

Nottawasaga Valley Conservation Authority

Public Notice ISSUED: 17 April 2018 EXPIRES: 17 May 2018

Town of Essex, Vermont January, 2017 Standard Specifications For Construction CHAPTER 3 EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL

TES Industrial Development SW ¼ SEC Lacombe County Outline Plan

ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT

Mixed Conifer Working Group Meeting April 15, 2011 Water and Soil Resource Management Considerations

Compensatory Mitigation Plan Requirements For Permittee Responsible Mitigation Projects St. Louis District, Corps of Engineers May 2010

Draft Mine Closure Plan. 17 October 2018 Longlac & Geraldton

WHATCOM COUNTY STANDARD CONSERVATION FARM PLAN PLANNING WORKBOOK: Checklist and Action Plan

DRAINAGE REPAIR POLICY FOR COUNTY DRAINAGE SYSTEMS. Drainage System No.

Protecting and Enhancing Ecosystem Services the Role of Wetlands and Watershed Management in Flood Attenuation Dr. Mark Gloutney Director Regional

REASONS FOR DECISION MINISTERIAL APPROVAL PURSUANT TO SECTION 15(1)(a) THE ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT ACT

APPENDIX I. Plan Reviewer Checklist

The following chart may be used to help identify the Common Language Terms/Categories for your project activities:

Watercourses and Wetlands and Agricultural Activities

DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY WATER BUREAU PART 17. SOIL EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION CONTROL

STORMWATER DISCHARGES ASSOCIATED WITH CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY

Public Notice ISSUED: March 17, 2016 EXPIRES: April 17, 2016

Wetlands and Beaver Science. Share with Wildlife!

New Approach to Agricultural Water Management

TOTAL: 5,250 acres over next 20 years 3

Maitland Valley WATERSHED

Water Resources Program.

MINNEHAHA CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT BOARD OF MANAGERS REVISIONS PURSUANT TO MINNESOTA STATUTES 103D.341. Adopted April 24, 2014 Effective June 6, 2014

Guidelines for Preparing a Compensatory Mitigation Plan

Preface. MNR # Queen s Printer for Ontario, 2012 ISBN (PRINT) ISBN (PDF)

Public Notice ISSUED: June 29, 2017 EXPIRES: July 31, 2017

CRANBERRY MARSH RESTORATION PROCESS Lynde Shores Conservation Area

The Reinvest in Minnesota Land Retirement Program

Alberta Wetland Mitigation Directive

CATEGORY a protection of the natural environment, its ecosystems and biodiversity.

MCLEOD COUNTY JOINT DRAINAGE SYSTEM POLICY AND GUEIDELINES FOR REPAIR

Wildlife Management Planning Guidelines for the South Texas Plains Ecoregion

How to avoid getting bogged down by the Nova Scotia Wetland Conservation Policy

TYPICAL CONTENTS OF A SITE-SPECIFIC NATURAL RESOURCE AND WOODLAND STAND DELINEATION MAP:

Guidance on each of the 23 basic elements follows: Plan Index showing locations of required items: The plan index should include a list of the

Guidance Document for Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) Submittal. A2 Plat showing building lot numbers/boundaries and road layout/names:

Galiuro Exploration Drilling Project

AUMA Policy Paper 2013.A1

beneficial management practices

Appendix E : Guidelines for Riparian Buffer Areas

awetlands aprairie aforests ahabitat for Fish, Game & Wildlife

Lignite Mining and Reclamation Process. Kayla Torgerson The Coteau Properties Co.

2017 MB Envirothon. Theme Training Document

Reclamation Plan for the Non-metallic Mining Site owned and operated by Birds Eye Foods, LLC.

GRADING, EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION CONTROL

ARTICLE 6 EXCAVATION OF MINERAL MATERIALS

THE ROLE OF THE AGRICULTURAL SECTOR IN BIODIVERSITY OFFSETTING

A Natural Solution to a Complex Problem

Erosion & Sedimentation Control Policy

Brief History of RCD Mitigation Work and the ILFP

Fish Habitat Protection Development Permit Area

Central Assiniboine and Lower Souris River Watershed. Public Consultation What you told us. June 2010

Plan Review Background Paper Background Paper Number: 19 Planning & Development Department Date: September 2015

Watershed Health and Water Management in the Porcupine Hills

Wildlife Management Intensity Standards

Lower Qu Appelle Watershed Quality and Quantity Review March 17, 2018

Ecosystem Service Credits An overview of credit opportunities in Minnesota

Our environment contains a variety of

HOUSE BILL lr0052

CONSERVATION RESERVE ENHANCEMENT PROGRAM (CREP) SUMMARY OF THE WISCONSIN S PROJECT

Request for Proposal Scope Development Guide. Asotin County Geomorphic Assessment. and. Conceptual Restoration Plan

APPENDIX H Guidance for Preparing/Reviewing CEQA Initial Studies and Environmental Impact Reports

COWLITZ COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF BUILDING AND PLANNING

Construction Environmental Management Plan (CEMP) for Potash Overland Conveyor

Phase II: Proposed (regulated) Impervious in disturbed area (ac) Long Lake Existing Impervious in disturbed area (ac)

Erosion and Sediment Pollution Control Guidelines for Residential Lots with soil disturbance of less than 1 acre (see exceptions)

719 Griswold, Suite 820 Detroit, MI DANVERS POND DAM REMOVAL AND STREAM RESTORATION PROJECT

Soils Study. Swan Lake Hydroelectric Project (FERC Project No. 2911) June Long View Associates, Inc. Ridgefield, Washington

Transcription:

Wetland Compensation Plan Prepared for Prairie Mines & Royalty ULC Poplar River Mine North Expansion By Ducks Unlimited Canada May 2014 ducks.ca

INTRODUCTION In order to compensate for the wetland hectares lost during mining progression of Pit 8 at Poplar River Mine North Extension, Prairie Mines & Royalty ULC proposes the implementation of a wetland loss compensation plan, prepared by Ducks Unlimited Canada (DUC), to replace wetlands disturbed at an off-site location. In 2013, Stantec prepared a Wetland Impact Evaluation report for the Pit 8 expansion at Poplar River Mine North for the Ministry of Environment (MOE) as per the Draft Ministry of Environment s Wetland Mitigation Guideline: User Handbook. The Stantec report identified a total wetland area of 8.63 original hectares. Using the wetland debit calculation, outlined in the above mentioned Mitigation Guidelines, this area computes to 15.03 service hectares (see table 1). DUC used the wetland credit calculation, from the same Mitigation Guidelines, to compute 12.02 offset hectares being required to replace the identified debit service hectares. An off-site restoration/compensation plan will require the submission of a change in development, in order to meet our conditional approval pursuant to Section 16(2)(a) of the Environmental Assessment Act, EAB File #2004-002 and EAB File #2010-106. This compensation plan will serve as the Change in Development submission. COMPENSATION PROPOSAL Wetland Compensation DUC proposes to be the habitat compensation delivery agent and would address the loss of wetland habitat impacted by the Prairie Mines & Royalty ULC Pit 8 expansion project. The MOE will ultimately provide approval for the compensation plan and will apply a formula based approach to determining debits (wetlands lost) and credits (wetlands restored) described in this proposal. The compensation plan includes all costs associated with: Identifying and sourcing potential lands,assessment of property, reconnaissance and wetland restoration design Land securement negotiations Land purchase costs and subsequent loss incurred when re-selling the property with a perpetual conservation easement (CE) placed on the title Appraisals and legal fees Stewardship costs of acquired land including restoration costs A one-time contribution to a project management fund for the long term/perpetual management and monitoring of the property Professional survey to verify the wetland acres restored for auditing purposes (internally or externally) Wetland Compensation Plan Ducks Unlimited Canada 2

Credit Calculation As per the MOE guidelines the following multipliers are being used to determine service credits for potential wetland restoration projects in DUC s Missouri Coteau priority landscape. DUC determined each multiplier below by analyzing six recently purchased quarter sections that had sufficient wetland restoration to satisfy the service hectare debits. Similar multipliers are anticipated for properties secured in within the Missouri Coteau. Wetlands of special concern [M wc ] Multiplier of 1.00 (<50% wetland loss) Ecosystem services [M es ] Multiplier of 1.00 Native upland habitat [M up ] Multiplier of 1.25 (50-75%upland loss) Wetland numbers [M wn ] Multipier of 1.25 (11-49 wetlands) Species of concern [M soc ] Multiplier of 1.00 (no known species of concern) Offset type [M typ ] Multiplier of 1.00 (wetland restoration) Offset permanence [M prm ] 0.80 (perpetual conservation easement) Offset risk [M rsk ] 1.00 (DUC has a proven track record in approach) Service ha debits [S ha ] 15.03 ha (as determined by Stantec Evaluation) The MOE credit calculation is: S ha = (O ha )(M wc )(M es )(M up )(M wn )(M soc )(M typ )(M prm )(M rsk ) The following calculation determines the required amount of offset hectares (O ha ) required to compensate the 15.03 service hectares (S ha ). S ha = 15.03 ha (M wc )(M es) (M up )(M wn )(M soc )(M typ )(M prm )(M rsk ) (1.0)(1.0)(1.25)(1.25)(1.0)(1.0)(0.8)(1.0) = 12.02 O ha offset hectares (29.7 acres) of restored wetland required (Missouri Coteau landscape) Compensation Program Delivery Options The compensation program will be delivered through DUC securing access to property (often requires the purchase of suitable lands) whereby the wetlands and associated riparian areas are restored. After all restoration activities are complete, DUC would protect the property with a perpetual CE placed on the land title that protects all the restored acres that contribute towards the compensation plan. DUC will seek out these suitable restorable properties but is contingent upon availability of the lands and Willing Seller/Willing Buyer and therefore a time period of five years may be required before land is secured and restored. Every effort will be made to complete the wetland compensation as soon as possible and annual progress reports will be prepared. Once the wetland restoration works are completed, DUC will annually monitor the restored wetlands and the constructed ditch plugs for three years. After the three-year period, the restored wetlands are considered established and inspections will carried out in a one-in-five year time frame. Wetland Compensation Plan Ducks Unlimited Canada 3

TABLE 1. DEBIT CALCULATION FOR WETLANDS TO BE DIRECTLY IMPACTED BY PROJECT Wetland ID Land Location Wetland Area (ha) Multiplier Service-hectares (ha) Qtr Sec Twp Rge Mer [Wha] [Mwc] [Mwl] [Mes] [Mwn] [Msoc] Sha Sha N 2 1 SE 23 3 26 W2 0.86 1 1 1 1.25 1 1.08 2.50 SW 24 3 26 W2 0.76 1.5 1 1 1.25 1 1.43 N 2 SW 24 3 26 W2 1.34 1.5 1 1 1.25 1.5 3.77 3.77 N 3 NE 14 3 26 W2 1.36 1 1 1 1.25 1 1.70 1.85 NW 13 3 26 W2 0.12 1 1 1 1.25 1 0.15 N 4 NE 14 3 26 W2 0.26 1 1 1 1.25 1 0.33 0.33 N 5 NE 14 3 26 W2 0.50 1 1 1 1.25 1 0.62 0.62 N 6 NW 13 3 26 W2 0.77 1 1 1 1.25 1 0.96 0.96 N 7 SW 24 3 26 W2 0.41 1.5 1 1 1.25 1 0.78 0.78 N 8 SW 24 3 26 W2 0.10 1.5 1 1 1.25 1 0.18 0.18 N 9 SW 24 3 26 W2 0.69 1.5 1 1 1.25 1 1.29 1.29 N 10 SW 24 3 26 W2 0.62 1.5 1 1 1.25 1 1.16 1.16 N 11 SE 24 3 26 W2 0.43 1.5 1 1 1.25 1 0.81 0.81 N 12 SW 24 3 26 W2 0.15 1.5 1 1 1.25 1 0.28 0.28 N 13 SW 24 3 26 W2 0.05 1.5 1 1 1.25 1 0.09 0.09 N 14 SW 24 3 26 W2 0.04 1.5 1 1 1.25 1 0.08 0.08 N 15 NE 24 3 26 W2 0.10 1.5 1 1 1.25 1 0.05 0.05 N 16 NE 24 3 26 W2 0.06 1.5 1 1 1.25 1 0.11 0.11 N 17 NE 24 3 26 W2 0.03 1.5 1 1 1.25 1 0.19 0.19 Total Sha 15.03 2 The debit calculation for Wetland N 1, which is bisected by a road, was conducted in two parts to take into consideration land use differences between the different quarter sections. Note: S ha =(W ha )(M wc )(M wl )(M es )(M wn )(M soc ) Where [W ha ] is the size of the wetland to be impacted (in hectares) [M wc ] is the wetland of concern multiplier [M wl ] is the wetland loss multiplier [M es ] is the contribution to ecosystem services multiplier [M wn ] is the number of wetlands impacted multiplier [M soc ] is the species of concern multiplier Table prepared by Stantec in the Wetland Impact Evaluation for the Pit 8 Expansion at Poplar River North Mine, dated October 16, 2013. Wetland Compensation Plan Ducks Unlimited Canada 4

PRIORITY LANDSCAPE Missouri Coteau CACTUS LAKE HILLMOND SASKATCHEWAN Meadow Lake THICKWOOD North Battleford TRAMPING LAKE EAST THICKWOOD Saskatoon DANA HILLS La Ronge Prince Albert PRINCE ALBERT Smeaton Melfort LENORE/PONASS As a science based organization, DUC needs to consider the optimal conservation lands to apply to the compensation actions, which may or may not be in proximity to the Poplar River Mine Expansion Project site. DUC would target restoration activities in North American Waterfowl Management (NAWMP) target landscapes where the lands would add to existing blocks of functioning habitat (left). Some areas of the province are more conducive to locating drained wetlands that allow for restoration than other areas; DUC will deliver and complete the compensation plan where there are the greatest opportunities for success. Every effort will be made to deliver this wetland compensation in the Missouri Coteau priority landscape which is the nearest NAWMP target area to the mine expansion. CONJURING CREEK COTEAU NORTH ALLAN HILLS QUILL SOUTH TOUCHWOOD/BEAVER Yorkton UPPER ASSINIBOINE Melville PHEASANT HILLS FOX VALLEY COTEAU CENTRAL REGINA EAST Regina VIRDEN/SASK Weyburn COTEAU SOUTH LIGHTNING BOUNDARY PLATEAU Estevan Missouri Coteau Priority Landscape Wetland Compensation Plan Ducks Unlimited Canada 5

Typical ditch plug construction. Aerial view of newly constructed ditch plugs. DITCH PLUG CONSTRUCTION The first component to restoring a landscape s health is to restore its hydrological function. This can be done by plugging existing ditches and recontouring areas back to their natural wetland shape. In very short time, Mother Nature takes over, the wetland refills through natural runoff, and plants and animals return to the wetland. Restored wetland after 1 year. Restored Wetland after 3 years. Wetland Compensation Plan Ducks Unlimited Canada 6

Appendix A. How to Restore a Prairie Wetland Typical prairie wetlands are the easiest types of wetlands to restore. The wetland can simply be restored by re-contouring (ditch plugging) part of the drainage ditch back to the original ground level to restore water retention. This is the most cost effective method that uses on site soil material to re-contour the drainage area to pre-drainage conditions. Once a drained wetland site has been identified through the use of air photos, satellite imagery and/or topographic maps, a field visit is required to identify the location of the ditch plug and if there is any need for a survey. A survey may be required if the restored wetland may possibly flood a neighboring landowner or road. Adjusting the plug height is critical to keeping the water within the natural confines of the wetland basin, so a survey can help in understanding what height to build the ditch plug and exactly what area will be flooded. Once the field visit and survey (if required) is complete, a contractor is hired to start moving dirt. First, the topsoil is removed from the ditch and high ground area and stockpiled for later use. Using dirt from the high ground, the ditch is filled in and the ground re-contoured to natural levels. The ditch is filled in from the edge of the wetland back along the ditch at a 10:1 slope. The topsoil is then spread over the filled ditch and disturbed ground and seeded with a grass legume mix. Seed is broadcast on the site and then followed by a harrow to promote seed contact with the soil. topsoil mineral soil srtipped topsoil Step A Strip topsoil from ditch and high ground area and stock pile for later. natural or historic water level of drained basin ditch Step C Recontour fill downstream. high ground Strip topsoil from ditch and high ground area use dirt from high ground for fill Step B Using dirt from high ground, fill in the ditch to restore the wetland bank and recontour the ground to natural level. stock pile topsoil water water level bottom of ditch fill in ditch from edge of wetland back along ditch at 10:1 slope. bottom of ditch (to be filled) Step D Spread the topsoil back over the filled ditch and disturbed ground and seed the area with a grass legume mix. Replace topsoil and seed with a grass legume mix Plugs are typically built in the fall so that the basin can catch water from the spring snow melt in the following year. Inspection of the plug would take place the following spring or summer to make sure that vegetation is growing on the plug and no erosion has taken place on the plug. If necessary, repairs and re-seeding would be completed in the fall. If the land around the restored wetlands is cultivated, this land would be seeded with a forage seed mix. A meadow brome and alfalfa seed mix is often used with avoidance of invasive species like smooth brome. After the ditch plug is constructed and the basin begins to collect water, most restored wetlands will develop emergent and submersed aquatic vegetation within the first few years. A GIS sketch plan is drawn for each property, where each ditch plug would be identified with a GPS location. The number of flooded acres are identified for each quarter section and recorded on the sketch plan. Other land features on the properties such as trees and seeded uplands are also identified and included in the sketch plan. Appendix Ducks Unlimited Canada 7