Historical Affairs and Landmark Review Board Arlington County, Virginia

Similar documents
Historical Affairs and Landmark Review Board Arlington County, Virginia

Historical Affairs and Landmark Review Board Arlington County, Virginia

Historical Affairs and Landmark Review Board Arlington County, Virginia

Historical Affairs and Landmark Review Board Arlington County, Virginia

Historical Affairs and Landmark Review Board Arlington County, Virginia

Z HISTORIC DISTRICT Proposed Historic District designation of the Fraber House located at 1612 N. Quincy St.

Historical Affairs and Landmark Review Board Arlington County, Virginia

CITY OF SAVANNAH HISTORIC DISTRICT BOARD OF REVIEW REQUEST FOR CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS

APPLICATION FOR WINDOW/DOOR REPLACEMENT

306 6th Street SW

100 SUNSET AVENUE. DHR RESOURCE NUMBER: Primary: Double/Duplex (non-contributing) DATE/PERIOD: Architectural Description

2104 HILL STREET. DHR RESOURCE NUMBER: Primary: Single Dwelling (contributing) DATE/PERIOD: circa Architectural Description

STAFF BRIEF. Kristin Park

r e s i d e n t i a l o u t s i d e v i l l a g e c e n t e r

STAFF BRIEF. Project Scope and Staff Summary Under Review:

ARTICLE 3 OVERLAY ZONES. Table of Contents

104 TODD AVENUE. Primary: Single Dwelling (contributing) Secondary: Garage (contributing) Architectural Description

An ordinance amending CHAPTER 51A, "PART II OF THE DALLAS. DEVELOPMENT CODE," of the Dallas City Code, as amended, by establishing

KNOXVILLE HISTORIC ZONING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS APPLICATION

2. House Designs. SAL Review

HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION STAFF REPORT

STAFF BRIEF. Project Scope Under Review: Remove a rear shed roof addition, and construct a 898 square foot, 2 story gable roof addition.

CITY HISTORIC ZONING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT - CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS APPLICATION

ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA. County Board Agenda Item Meeting of September 20, 2014

MAJOR ALTERATIONS & SPECIAL EXCEPTION

CITY OF DES MOINES HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION MEETING SUMMARY

County Board Adopted September 20, 2014

Residential Design Standards Draft 9 August 2013

F. EXTERIOR SIDINGS, FINISHES, FACINGS and MATERIALS

HC , th Street (Roof Repair) Carey & Beverly Beard (Owners) & Brenda Scott, Best Roofing (Applicant)

CITY OF DES MOINES HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION MEETING SUMMARY

MISTLETOE HEIGHTS HISTORIC AND CULTURAL DISTRICT GUIDELINES

DRAFT MINUTES OF THE HISTORICAL AFFAIRS AND LANDMARK REVIEW BOARD Wednesday, October 17, Clarendon Boulevard Lobby Rooms Cherry and Dogwood

City of Port Huron Michigan. Historic District Guidelines and Application

ARB Guidelines for approval of Detached Garage designs in Ashborough East

Staff Review Date: January 10, 2017 HDC PID#

KNOXVILLE HISTORIC ZONING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS APPLICATION

SALT LAKE CITY HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION

STAFF BRIEF. Doors: Unknown

Historic Preservation Commission Motion No HEARING DATE: OCTOBER 3, 2018

STAFF BRIEF. Anchen Wang Sustronk6 LLC

City of Astoria Development Code ARTICLE 6 HISTORIC PROPERTIES

Architectural Inventory Form

STAFF BRIEF. Excerpted from Design Guidelines for Denver Landmark Structures and Districts, January 2016

ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW CHECKLIST ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS SINGLE MODEL

MASONRY, ARCHITECTURE DESIGN AND BUILDING STANDARDS

MINUTES OF THE MEETING COMMISSION ON CHICAGO LANDMARKS March 5, 2015

The developer / builder desires to follow the Design Guidelines and Design Features as listed below in lieu of the Basic Standards.

Oxford Historic Preservation Commission

ORDINANCE NO

City of Easton, Pennsylvania HISTORIC DISTRICT COMMISSION

ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA HISTORICAL AFFAIRS AND LANDMARK REVIEW BOARD APPLICATION FOR CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS

HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION STAFF REPORT. Good Rear Porch Enclosure and Remodel PLNHLC East 900 South March 5, 2015

Chapel Hill Historic District Certificate of Appropriateness Application Project Description:

City of Aurora, Ohio. Architectural Board of Review. Residential Guidelines

E Main Street June 14, 2010 Landmarks Commission Meeting

DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY PLANNING, HOUSING AND DEVELOPMENT Neighborhood Services Division

City of Richmond Zoning Ordinance Page 12-1

CITY OF DES MOINES HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION MEETING SUMMARY

ORDINANCENO An ordinance amending the zoning ordinances of the City of Dallas, as amended, by

Oak Park Historic Preservation Commission October 13, 2016 Meeting Minutes Oak Park Village Hall, Room 101, 7:30 pm

Guidelines for New Construction in Albany s Residential Historic Districts & Neighborhoods

106 RAYMOND AVENUE. Primary: Single Dwelling (contributing) Secondary: Garage (contributing) Architectural Description

STAFF BRIEF. Zeke Freeman, Root Architecture & Development LLC

Residential Uses in the Historic Village Core

Virginia. County of Powhatan, Application: Development Design Pattern Book. For Office Use Only. Case Number. Date of Approval

KNOXVILLE HISTORIC ZONING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS APPLICATION

32 St Andrews Gardens, Alteration of a Structure in the North Rosedale Heritage Conservation District

by establishing Historic Overlay District No. 138 (Saint Joseph's Catholic Church and

Elgin Heritage Commission Design Review Subcommittee. Tuesday, February 14, :00 p.m.

Historic Preservation Commission

106 ROBERTSON AVENUE

SECTION 6.3 DOWNTOWN HISTORIC DISTRICT (DTH)

Roxanne Tanemori, Principal Planner; Steve Mizokami, Senior Planner

Oxford Historic Preservation Commission

Arlington County Historical Affairs and Landmark Review Board 2100 Clarendon Boulevard, Suite 700, Arlington, Virginia

Oxford Historic Preservation Commission

Staff Review Date: February 14, 2018 HDC PID#

Planning and Zoning Division Department of Community Development. Applicant: Kevin Bott

Planning and Zoning Division Department of Community Development. Applicant: Jason Guinn

Architectural Inventory Form

City of Placerville Planning Commission AGENDA

NEW CONSTRUCTION ADDENDUM TO COA APPLICATION

RESIDENTIAL DESIGN GUIDELINES FOR BENT TREE OF ROGERS

Certificate of Appropriateness Case Report

HISTORIC PROPERTIES COMMISSION DESIGN GUIDELINES FOR CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS

Architectural Inventory Form

Architectural Inventory Form

MONTGOMERY COUNTY HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION STAFF REPORT. Address: 1 Quincy St., Chevy Chase Meeting Date: 2/27/2019

Architectural Inventory Form

Resource: Contributing Resource Report Date: 10/3/2018 Capitol View Park Historic District

STAFF BRIEF. Community Planning and Development Denver Landmark Preservation

Maintaining Materials Within the District

Alterations to a Designated Heritage Property in the North Rosedale Heritage Conservation District Glen Road

DHR RESOURCE NUMBER: Primary: Single Dwelling (non-contributing) DATE/PERIOD: Architectural Description

Staff Review Date: February 14, 2018 HDC PID#

Denver, CO Primary external wall material Synthetics / Vinyl

Standards for Single Family Detached Lots

Proposed List of development and architectural standards to be amended

Staff Review Date: April 10, 2019 HDC PID#

Transcription:

Historical Affairs and Landmark Review Board Arlington County, Virginia HALRB Case 16-01 (HP1600003) A request by Peter & Yolanda Severs, owners of 2314 North Kenmore Street in the Maywood Neighborhood Historic District, to demolish the existing outbuilding (chicken coop), garage, and deck. Arlington County Historic Preservation Program HALRB Meeting August 20, 2016

HALRB/Design Review Committee Report Meeting Date: February 3, 2016 For DRC (circle those present): Robert Dudka, Charles Craig, Charles Matta, Andrew Wenchel, Tova Solo, Joan Lawrence For Arlington County (circle those present): Cynthia Liccese-Torres, Rebeccah Ballo, John Liebertz Case # 16-01 Agenda Item # Applicant(s): Sever For Applicant(s): Application Complete Application Incomplete (See attached application for applicant, address, name of property and property description, drawings, photographs, and proposed scope of work.) Design Recommendations: 1. Okay with full-width front porch. 2. Setbacks on both sides 12 preferred 3. Photographs of existing garage 4. Submit proposed water retention/management 5. Include drawings of the chicken coop 6. Vinyl windows are not allowed on the historic house or addition; all trim on the historic section of the house must be wood; trim on the addition may be cellular PVC or cementitious fiberboard trim. Findings: X Return to next DRC meeting Send to HALRB If sent to HALRB, recommended action is: Place on consent agenda Place on discussion agenda: Recommend approval of CoA, with DRC design recommendations and/or additional information provided Recommend deferral of ruling on CoA (explanation): Recommend denial of CoA (explanation): No recommendation. L:\HAND_HP\COA\2016\CoA.16-01.HP1600003.2314 North Kenmore Street.Addition\DRC REPORT.2016.02.03.CoA.16-01.2314 North Kenmore Street.docx

HALRB/Design Review Committee Report Meeting Date: August 3, 2016 For DRC (circle those present): Robert Dudka, Charles Craig, Charles Matta, Andrew Wenchel, Tova Solo, Joan Lawrence, John Peck For Arlington County (circle those present): Cynthia Liccese-Torres, Rebeccah Ballo, John Liebertz Case # 16-01 Agenda Item # 3 Application Complete Application Incomplete Applicant(s): Peter & Yolanda Sever For Applicant(s): Homework Remodeling (See attached application for applicant, address, name of property and property description, drawings, photographs, and proposed scope of work.) Design Recommendations: 1. Include before plat in package. 2. Use dotted lines on drawings to call out pieces to be demolished. 3. Improve documentation of existing condition drawing for the chicken coop/garage. a. Chicken Coop Overall i. Add dimension lines/measurements throughout existing drawings. ii. Remove notes to outside of drawing. 1. We don t need notes that say for example Existing wood roof rafters to be dismantled as it will all be demolished. The only notes really should be calling out different materials. b. Chicken Coop Front Elevation i. Front door drawn incorrectly; it s not a two-paneled door and the swing (knob) on wrong side. ii. Spacing of the doors and windows to each other and their location appears to be off compared to the photographs. 1. There is only a small gap between the door and first ribbon of windows. 2. The size of the hopper/awning windows in the foundation look too large and are incorrectly located. Show mullions on all foundation window (note material). iii. The grade appears to be incorrect. The front door is not that high above grade is it? Redraw your grade line to match existing conditions. iv. Make sure the windows match the existing condition. Are there windows on the front elevation at all? If so, were they 4/4 as drawn or 12-light casement similar to other elevations? v. Show corner boards. vi. Show wood siding and the terra cotta. 1. Note dimension of terra cotta tile. vii. Show/note roofing material. c. Chicken Coop Right Elevation i. You are missing this elevation; there is a chimney on it. d. Chicken Coop Left Elevation i. The ribbon of three windows are 12-light casement windows. \ ii. The other single window is drawn incorrectly. It looks to be a 2-light not a 6- light casement. iii. Similar to front show wood siding and terra cotta tile foundation. Need to see where it shifts. L:\HAND_HP\COA\2016\CoA.16-01.HP1600003.2314 North Kenmore Street.Addition\DRC REPORT.2016.08.03.CoA.16-01.2314 North Kenmore Street.docx

iv. Either the size of the building, the size of the windows, or the location of the grade (potentially all three) are not drawn correctly. Please correct. Check the distance from the first story windows to foundation windows. v. Show the location of the remaining chimney; note that it fell. e. Chicken Coop Rear Elevation i. Make sure the door drawn represents the existing condition. ii. The windows appear to be drawn incorrectly. From the interior it looks like the basement windows are double-hung with a three-light lower sash and a one-light upper sash. Then there is a 3-light transom above. See Photograph labeled Coop Bottom Left Room Front Wall. Please have the windows on the elevation reflect this condition. iii. Check the first floor window. iv. Check grade line. Findings: Return to next DRC meeting X Send to HALRB If sent to HALRB, recommended action is: _ X Place on consent agenda Place on discussion agenda: Recommend approval of CoA, with DRC design recommendations and/or additional information provided Recommend deferral of ruling on CoA (explanation): Recommend denial of CoA (explanation): No recommendation. L:\HAND_HP\COA\2016\CoA.16-01.HP1600003.2314 North Kenmore Street.Addition\DRC REPORT.2016.08.03.CoA.16-01.2314 North Kenmore Street.docx

HISTORICAL AFFAIRS AND LANDMARK REVIEW BOARD ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS STAFF REPORT To: From: HALRB John Liebertz, Historic Preservation Planner Date: August 9, 2016 Subject: 2314 North Kenmore Street, CoA 16-01, Maywood Historic District Background Information The property at 2314 North Kenmore Street consists of the following three resources: single-family dwelling (built ca. 1910), chicken coop (built ca. 1920) and garage (built prior to 1929). 1959 Sanborn Fire Insurance Map House and Garage The house is a Colonial Revival-inspired dwelling constructed ca. 1910. The Maywood National Register Nomination describes the house as follows: The wood frame dwelling sits on a solid stuccoed foundation and is capped by a frontgabled roof with asphalt shingles. The dwelling, clad in asbestos shingles, measures four bays in width and features a two-bay porch on square posts, overhanging eaves, and sixover-one wood-sash windows. Other details include molded wood surrounds, an exteriorend brick chimney, and a molded wood cornice with gable-returns. The house is said to incorporate a circa 1908 house that was severely damaged by fire. The house originally matched the design of the adjacent house at 2318 North Kenmore Street (see comparison on next page). Additions to the subject house consisted of extending the building one-bay to the north, adding a second story, extending the roof over the one-bay front porch addition, and connecting the garage to the house. 1

HISTORICAL AFFAIRS AND LANDMARK REVIEW BOARD ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA 2314 North Kenmore (subject property) 2318 North Kenmore (original design) Built in the 1920s, the one-story, single-bay concrete block garage has board-and-batten upper gable ends that are protected by a standing seam metal roof. In 1940, the footprint of the original garage expanded 1 to the north. The former owners later encapsulated the façade of the historic garage with a front addition that directly abutted the rear elevation of the house (the standing seam metal roof partially obscures a window). The building has minimal fenestration. The original door on the east elevation (façade) has been removed. There are no openings on the north elevation (side). The west elevation (rear) features a single four-light wood casement window in the upper gable end and the south elevation (side) has a single-leaf door. The dwelling and garage were both listed as contributing resources to the Maywood National Register Historic District. After further evaluation of historic maps, photographs, and other sources, staff disagrees with this assessment and considers both buildings to be non-contributing elements to the historic district. The authors of the National Register nomination were unaware of the extensive changes to the house and garage. These resources lack integrity of materials, design, workmanship, and feeling, and therefore, should be non-contributing resources. Chicken Coop The Maywood National Register Nomination failed to document the circa. 1920 chicken coop built during the neighborhood s period of significance. The one-story chicken coop with an exposed basement on the rear elevation is built into the landscape. The three-bay, wood-frame building rests on a terra cotta tile block foundation. The coop is sheathed with wood drop siding and protected by a side-gable asphaltshingle roof. The one-story, three-bay, east elevation (façade) of the coop consists of a simple batten wood door on its southern end followed by two ribbons of three screened openings (formerly holding 12-light wood casement windows). The foundation is pierced by two three-light metal awning windows. The two-bay south elevation (side) consists of a ribbon of three 12-light wood casement windows and a two-light awning window separated by an exterior end-wall chimney that has partially collapsed. The foundation is pierced by a single three-light metal awning window. The three-bay west elevation (rear) consists of a fully exposed basement. On the basement, a single-leaf three-panel, two-light wood door is located towards the northern extent. Two windows, a one-over-one double-hung wood-sash window and a oneover-three double-hung wood-sash window, are capped by a three-light metal awning window. Clad in 2

HISTORICAL AFFAIRS AND LANDMARK REVIEW BOARD ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA vinyl siding, the two-bay first story consists of a one-over-one double-hung wood-sash window and a four-light casement window. The north elevation (side) has no fenestration but retains an intact exterior end-wall brick chimney. The building should be a contributing resource to the Maywood National Register Historic District as it is built within the period of significance, is the last agricultural outbuilding in the neighborhood, and has sufficient historic integrity. Proposal The subject proposal calls for the demolition of the garage, rear deck, and chicken coop. The site of the chicken coop would be backfilled and sodded. DRC Review The DRC heard this case at its June and August 2016 meetings. At the June meeting, the DRC requested that the applicants return with better documentation of the house, garage, and chicken coop but were supportive of the proposal. The DRC agreed that the chicken coop was a public safety hazard and structurally unsound. The committee asked the applicants to return with plans on how the site of the chicken coop and the rear of the dwelling would be treated post demolition. Staff supported the applicant s request to demolish the garage as it is a non-contributing resource to the historic district and did not make a recommendation regarding the chicken coop. Staff, however, agreed that the chicken coop had severe structural issues (bowing of foundation wall, collapse of roof, collapse of floor, etc.) and diminished historic integrity. The applicants returned to the DRC in August 2016. The DRC requested further clarifications on the submitted drawing set and better representations of the existing conditions (both the garage and chicken coop). The DRC made no recommendation and placed this case on the consent agenda (pending revised drawings) for the August 17, 2016, HALRB meeting. Discussion and Recommendation Demolition of the Garage and Deck Staff supports the applicant s request to demolish the existing garage and deck (pending the submittal of updated drawings). While the National Register nomination listed the garage as a contributing resource, staff disagrees with this assessment. The building lacks integrity of design, workmanship, materials, and association, due to multiple additions to the house and to the garage. Demolition of the Chicken Coop Per the Maywood Historic District Design Guidelines and the Secretary of the Interior s Standards for Rehabilitation, the demolition of a contributing resource is not recommended. These policy documents do not differentiate between historic houses and outbuildings; however, in past decisions the HALRB has placed primacy on the preservation of contributing dwellings over other protected elements. The chicken coop is the only known agricultural outbuilding remaining in Maywood. The HALRB should also discuss the integrity and structural stability of the chicken coop. The deterioration of the coop stems from numerous issues, many of which potentially predate the creation of the Maywood Local Historic District. The deteriorated building elements and unsafe conditions of the coop have been documented. The terra cotta tile block foundation wall is severely bowing, elements of the first floor have collapsed or are on the verge of collapsing, sections of the roof are missing, chimneys have collapsed, and there is potentially mold. 3

HISTORICAL AFFAIRS AND LANDMARK REVIEW BOARD ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA Section 11.3.5. General maintenance; ordinary maintenance allowed; public safety (subheading of 11.3 Historic Preservation Overlay District) of the Arlington County Zoning Ordinance states the following regarding unsafe and dangerous buildings: Nothing in this section [Historic Preservation Overlay District] shall prevent the construction, reconstruction, alteration, restoration or demolition of any such feature which the building official shall certify is required to maintain and uphold public safety because of an unsafe or dangerous condition that cannot otherwise be remedied and that is not the result, either directly or indirectly, of the owner s negligence. In a similar case, the HALRB recently approved the demolition of a contributing garage at 2102 North Irving Street. The board approved the demolition of the garage in part to ensure public health and safety issues. The chicken coop poses a similar hazard to the neighborhood and property owner. Staff has no recommendation regarding this part of the application. Neither the Maywood Design Guidelines nor the Secretary of the Interior s Standards for Rehabilitation expressly allows for the demolition of a contributing resource. The section of the Arlington County Zoning Ordinance referenced above, however, discusses buildings in historic districts that are a public safety issue. The HALRB s findings must reference the following documents: Arlington County Zoning Ordinance, Maywood Historic District Design Guidelines, and/or the Secretary of the Interior s Standards. 4