TIERING ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEWS MAY 11, 2017

Similar documents
Perspectives on Environmental Review

Project Information. *Project Name: *Responsible Entity: Grant Recipient (if different than Responsible Entity): State/Local Identifier: *Preparer:

Atlanta SMAC Conference April 18, 2017

PROGRAM NAME: Northfield Owner-Occupied Home Rehabilitation 2015

PROGRAM NAME: Washington County HOME Program 2015

Program Name: Syracuse Neighborhood Revitalization Program Responsible Entity (RE): New York State Homes & Community Renewal

FEMA and GPD s Environmental Planning & Historic Preservation Review

Center for Social Innovation CPD_Part58_101012

ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET. Description of the Proposed Project [24 CFR & 58.32; 40 CFR ]:

National Housing Trust Fund Environmental Review and Funding Requirements

Environmental Review Process. Geoff Amison, CDBG

DATE PROJECT NAME PROJECT ADDRESS ENVIRONMENTAL CONDUCTED BY ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEWED BY DATE APPROVAL SIGNATURE

2.1.1 Traffic Noise Analysis

Updates on FAA Order F. Agenda. Communicate FAA Order Updates. Educate attendees on the changes to FAA Order

The items described below are required prior to closing if any of the items below are completed, please include with the HTF application.

Step 1: Determine whether the action is located in a 100-year floodplain (or a 500-year floodplain for critical actions) or wetland.

USDA Rural Development Technical Information

Requirements for Housing Trust Fund Environmental Provisions. CPD Notice 16-14

FINAL PROGRAMMATIC ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT for the NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF JUSTICE GRANTS PROGRAM

An Overview and Comparison of the Tennessee Department of Transportation s Environmental Evaluation Process

Environmental Review for Activity/Project that is Categorically Excluded Subject to Section 58.5

Environmental Review and

U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Community Planning and Development. Notice: CPD-16-14

ENVIRONMENTAL AUTHORIZATIONS FOR FEDERAL NAVIGATION AND PROJECTS

Environmental Clearance and Next Year s Grant. Los Angeles Airport District Office. Presented by: Brenda Pérez George Buley David Cushing

Environmental Review Standards for OHTF Funded Projects

ODOT Floodplain Management. Jeffrey Syar, P.E., Administrator, Central Office,Hydraulic Engineering

CC-530EHP Flood Protection

Matrix of Major Environmental Laws and Regulations Provisions Related to Components of an Indirect and Cumulative Impact Analysis 1 2

Agency Scoping. May 31, :00 a.m. 1:00 p.m. Environmental Impact Statement Port Columbus International Airport

Agency Due Diligence. Phase I Environmental Site Assessments (ESAs)

TOWN OF KILL DEVIL HILLS, NORTH CAROLINA ANNUAL PROGRESS REPORT ON ADOPTED HAZARD MUTIGATION PLAN COMMUNITY #

NEPA Mitigation Webinar:

APPENDIX G. Applicable or Relevant and Appropriate Requirements (ARARs) Revised EE/CA. Lower Duwamish Waterway Superfund Site: T-117 Early Action Area

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENTS - COUNCIL ON ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY REGULATIONS CHECKLIST

TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH BOARD. Expediting the NEPA Process - What Does it Take? Tuesday, October 31, :00-3:30 PM ET

Compliance with NEPA

ACCORD 2015 HOME LPA Program. Allegany County Community Opportunity and Rural Development, Inc. Mrs. Lesley Gooch-Christman Executive Director

Project Scoping Meeting Thousand Palms Flood Control Project EIR/EIS

9 OTHER CONSIDERATIONS REQUIRED BY NEPA

6/8/2016. Development Factors. Part 58 Review. Environmental Assessment Development Factors

TIER 2 EIS SCOPING MEETING WELCOME TO THE FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION SCOPING MEETING

Strategies in Environmental Clearance

Environmental Assessment Central Power Electric Cooperative, Lallie Substation Relocation Project Benson County, North Dakota FEMA-DR 1981-ND-28R

Public Notice. Navigation Section Notice Date: May 23, 2018 PO Box 3755 Expiration Date: June 21, 2018

1.0 Introduction. The USACE Fort Worth District s goals for the REIS are to:

March Step ONE: Determine whether the action is located in a 100-year floodplain (or a 500-year floodplain for critical actions) or wetland

THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK

U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development COMMUNITY PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT

RECORD OF PLAN CONFORMANCE AND CATEGORICAL EXCLUSION (CX) DETERMINATION

Washington Dulles International Airport EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Local Partnership Team Environmental Workshop. Jennifer B. DeBruhl Assistant Division Administrator - Local Assistance Division (804)

FSH NATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY ACT HANDBOOK CHAPTER - ZERO CODE. Table of Contents

6 Other Considerations

October 19, 2017 Community Engagement Panel Meeting #4 Overview of Environmental Effects

Chapter 2 Table of Contents 2.1 PROJECT DEVELOPMENT PROCESS

Does Dry Floodproofing Work?

THE AMERICAN LAW INSTITUTE Continuing Legal Education

What s a NEPA? Modern Environmental Planning in the United States. Vanasse Hangen Brustlin, Inc.

Showing Only Sections Changed 6 th Edition FBC (2017) from 5 th Edition FBC (2015) [changes shown with underline and strike-through]

GUIDE FOR PREPARING THE ENVIRONMENTAL REPORT FOR WATER AND WASTE PROJECTS

Environmental Review for Activity/Project that is Categorically Excluded Subject to Section 58.5

Southern Ute Indian Tribe Coordination Kick-Off Meeting November 4, 2015

HOUSING TRUST FUND CORPORATION Environmental Compliance Handbook

Office of Community Renewal state funded program: Mobile and Manufactured Housing Replacement Program (MMHR) TABLE OF CONTENTS

Environmental Assessment Gold Digger Mining Plan of Operations

SRF 101 SRF Cross Cutters: Understanding the Environmental

Programmatic Categorical Exclusions

Connecticut Housing Finance Authority. Construction Guidelines: Environmental & Hazardous Materials Review 2018

Acronyms and. Abbreviations

Welcome and thank you for your interest in the proposed Baltimore-Washington Superconducting Maglev Project.

NOTICE OF AVAILABILITY

NEW YORK NEW JERSEY HARBOR AND TRIBUTARIES COASTAL STORM RISK MANAGEMENT

NEW YORK NEW JERSEY HARBOR AND TRIBUTARIES COASTAL STORM RISK MANAGEMENT

THE NEXT FRONTIER: OFFSHORE HYDRAULIC FRACTURING

Environmental Review for Activity/Project that is Categorically Excluded Subject to Section 58.5

Santa Clara Valley Habitat Plan Regional General Permit #18. Training and Workshop for Co-Permittees April 5, 2016

Draft Environmental Assessment E.H Burton Property Emergency Group Temporary Housing New Orleans, Orleans Parish Hurricane Katrina FEMA-1603-DR-LA

In Reply Refer To: 5400/1792 (OR-120) OR Mister Slate CT Timber Sale EA OR Slater Rocks Environmental Assessment.

U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Community Planning and Development

FEMA and Levees Levee Accreditation Reviews Proposed Changes to the FEMA Levee Policy

USACE Nationwide Permit 27 Workshop

I-15/US 93 Garnet Interchange & US 93 Improvements WELCOME. Public Information Meeting October 6, 2016

Appendix G Draft Memorandum of Agreement

Environmental Assessment of Rail Infrastructure in Illinois

Environmental Requirements and Enhancement Projects. Chip Ray VDOT Environmental Quality Division

9.0 I-26 & I-526 Interchange Improvements

Sustainability Metrics and Mapping Tool for Environmental Assessment of Rail Infrastructure in Illinois

Public Notice. Applicant: City of Dallas Project No.: SWF Date: April 18, Name: Chandler Peter Phone Number:

WELCOME TO THE FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINSTRATION SCOPING MEETING

6 Other Considerations Required by NEPA

Regulatory Guidance Letter 93-02

Oklahoma Department of Transportation Environmental Programs Division Office Fax

TRANSBAY PROGRAM FINAL EIS REEVALUATION

Categorical Exclusion Programmatic Agreement Between the Federal Highway Administration And the Indiana Department of Transportation

Northern Intermodal Transit Facility WHAT IS AN INTERMODAL TRANSIT FACILITY?

TIER 1 DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT. 7. Affected Environment, Environmental Consequences, and Mitigation Strategies

ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT. Sanitary Sewer Replacement LaMoure, North Dakota

Requirements and Considerations for Non- Residential Floodproofing ASFPM 2014

Environmental Assessment White Rock Mining Plan of Operations

Transcription:

TIERING ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEWS MAY 11, 2017

Presenters Presenters: Liz Zepeda, Danielle Schopp, Sandra Frye Moderator: Ben Sturm (Cloudburst) Presentation is in listen-only mode Q & A session at end of presentation 2

Webinar Format Webinar will last approximately 60 minutes and is being recorded Use the Question Pod to submit questions at any time during the webinar Submit unanswered questions: https://www.hudexchange.info/aska-question (for HEROS questions) or to your Field Environmental Officer (for substantive questions about how to prepare a tiered review) Use the Question Pod to request assistance with technical difficulties Feedback survey link and instructions to get credit will be emailed 3

Webinar Format At certain points in today s presentation, we may be demonstrating a website and sharing our computer screen. To see this most clearly, you may want to use the Full Screen button in the upper right of the GoToWebinar window. To submit a question, you will need to click the Full Screen button again to resume normal view. 4

Agenda PART 1: Theory and Basics of Completing a Tiered Review Overview/basics Conducting a Broad-Level Tiered Review Conducting Site-Specific Tiered Reviews Tiering Reviews in HEROS PART 2: Example Tiered Review Completing a Tiered Review in HEROS 5

What is Tiering? Goal of tiering = eliminate repetitive discussions of the same issues and to focus on the actual issues ripe for decision at each level of environmental review A tiered review consists of two stages: 1. A broad-level review 2. Subsequent site-specific reviews 6

Two Stages of Review Stage 1 - Broad-level review: identify and evaluate the issues that can be fully addressed and resolved, notwithstanding possible limited knowledge of the project ALSO establish the standards, constraints, and processes to be followed in the site-specific reviews. Stage 2 - Site-specific reviews: evaluate the remaining issues based on the policies established in the broad-level review as individual sites are selected for review Together, the broad-level review and all site-specific reviews comprise a complete environmental review record 7

Limitations on Activities The 7015.15 RROF and 7015.16 AUGF should be completed at the broad-level It is not necessary to get HUD approval on site-specific reviews Funds cannot be spent or committed on a specific site or activity until both the broad-level review and the sitespecific review have been completed for the site Refer to 24 CFR Part 58.22 8

Why Tier? Pros Save time & money on Request for Release of Funds, public notices Avoid repetitive analysis Cons More challenging More room for error 9

When to Use Tiering When to Tier Preparing to conduct a program of similar or repetitive activities Example #1: single family home repairs Example #2: sidewalk repairs Activities will be scattered but limited to a specific geographic range Example: neighborhood or defined portion of city RE is familiar with HUD s tiering policies and has discussed strategy with field staff When NOT to Tier Preparing to conduct unspecified activities using a single funding source Example: using CDBG funds to do any activity permissible under that program Sites have already been identified Example: constructing a new housing development RE is new to the environmental review process and thinks tiering sounds easier 10

BROAD-LEVEL REVIEW 11

Project Description Project description must define 1. All contemplated activities 2. All proposed funding sources 3. Maximum number of units/properties 4. Average cost per unit 5. Geographic range 6. Expiration date 12

Related Laws and Authorities Consider each of required environmental laws and authorities and either Resolve at the broad level OR Define a protocol to achieve compliance at site-specific level 13

Compliance at Broad-Level Possible if full scope of project can be determined to comply with an environmental law, authority, or factor May comply due to geography or activities involved (or a combination!) Example: Compliance based on location Las Vegas No Coastal Zones or Coastal Barriers in Nevada compliance with CZMA & CBRA at broad level Example: Compliance based on activities single family interior rehab No new construction/ground disturbance compliance with EO 11990, Wetlands Protection 14

Examples of Compliance Determinations Good Good Bad Proposed activities are limited to interior rehabilitation with no potential for ground disturbance, which will have no effect on wetlands. Project is therefore in compliance with EO 11990 and Wetlands Protection requirements in 24 CFR Part 55. Proposed project is in compliance with EO 11990 and Wetlands Protection requirements in 24 CFR Part 55, because there are no wetlands in the geographic range covered by this review. (See attached wetlands map provided by the US Fish and Wildlife Service.) Proposed project complies with Part 55. 15

Defining Protocols What if compliance cannot be achieved at Broad- Level? If compliance cannot be achieved at broad level, broad-level review must define procedures to be followed at site-specific level Protocol should define how to: 1. Determine compliance 2. Mitigate impacts where possible 3. Dismiss sites as appropriate 16

Examples of Site-Specific Protocols Good Good Bad All actions will be mapped on FEMA-issued Flood Insurance Rate Maps (FIRMs). An 8- Step Process will be completed at the site-specific level for any sites located in a Special Flood Hazard Area (SFHA) and mitigation measures will be tailored to the site. An early warning system and emergency evacuation and relocation plan will be required for all sites in an SFHA. All actions will be mapped on FEMAissued Flood Insurance Rate Maps (FIRMs). Any sites located in a Special Flood Hazard Area (SFHA) will be rejected for this program. Compliance will be achieved at sitespecific level. 17

Tiering Environmental Assessments (EAs) In addition to the related laws and authorities in 58.5 and 58.6, EAs must complete a more thorough NEPA review and consider all EA factors and analysis Like all EAs, tiered EAs must include a finding of no significant impact (FONSI) prior to Request for Release of Funds Protocols must be specific and detailed to ensure that there will not be a significant impact on the human environment 18

Completing Broad Level Reviews Public Notice must be clear about the nature and scope of the proposal Plain language project description must communicate scale of the review to the public A sample notice is available on the HUD Exchange Complete Request for Release of Funds process at broad level But do not commit funds to individual sites until site-specific review has been completed 19

Site-Specific Reviews 20

Site-Specific Reviews Complete site-specific reviews as sites are identified Determine and document compliance with all required laws and authorities that were not already resolved Follow protocols defined at broad level to concentrate on the pertinent issues If site-specific activity does not conform to limits established at broad level, separate review is required 21

Recordkeeping Environmental review record is not complete without both broad-level and site-specific reviews Site-specifics must identify corresponding broad-level review Both parts should be filed together Avoid monitoring findings make sure records are complete! 22

Reminder of Process 23

Tiered Reviews in HEROS 24

Getting Started 25

Starting a Tiered Review 26

Choosing Level of Review 27

Project Summary Screen 28

Project Summary, Cont. 29

Related Laws and Authorities Determine where compliance is achieved at broad level 30

Written Strategies Address only laws that must be considered at site-specific level 31

Finalizing Review Follow the same process to finalize tiered reviews in HEROS as you would for standard reviews Remember to provide clear public notice 32

Site-Specific Reviews 33

Other Levels of Review HEROS does not have formats for tiered EAs or EISs EA or EIS-level broad-level reviews should be created outside HEROS and uploaded when complete 34

Posting to HUD Exchange Tiered reviews are archived on the HUD Exchange for 5 years 35

Example Tiered Review PUTTING IT ALL TOGETHER 36

Example Tiered Review Single family rehab program Weatherization program: replacing windows, doors, and insulation, sealing gaps Mount Rainier, MD Borders on Washington, DC 1 square mile Historic district 37

Broad Level Analysis 38

How this Project Would Comply Group 1 Compliance at Broad Level based on general Activities (e.g. SFR): Farmlands, CAA, SSA, WSR Compliance at Broad Level based on Location: CBRA, Airport Hazards, ESA Group 2 Group 3 Compliance at Broad Level based on specific Project Plans: Wetlands, CZMA, Noise, Explosive Hazards Analysis required at Site-Specific: Floodplain Mgmt. & Insurance, Section 106, Contamination, EJ Group 4 39

Group 1 Determinations 40

Group 2 Determinations 41

Group 2 Documentation 42

Group 3 Determinations 43

Group 4: Compliance at Site Level 44

Group 4 Protocols 45

Group 4 Documentation at Broad Level 46

Site-Specific Reviews Basics of Site and Plans - Project location, proposed activities - Maps, photographs of site - Funding info Floodplain Management & Flood Insurance - FEMA Map - Proof of insurance (if in SFHA) - Completed 5-Step Process (if in SFHA + substantial improvement) Historic Preservation - Age of building, proximity to historic district - Documentation of compliance with PA (as appropriate) - Consultation history (as required) - Any required mitigation Toxics and Contamination - Map of site relative to any of the 3 sources of contamination - Discussion of potential risks and recommendations Environmental Justice - Confirmation that project has no adverse environmental impacts 47

Environmental Review Record 48

Questions? Have more questions? Submit unanswered HEROS questions to Ask A Question For project-specific questions or questions about how to prepare a tiered review, talk to your Field Environmental Officer 49

Additional Information HUD Exchange https://www.hudexchange.info/programs/environmental-review/ Tiering on the HUD Exchange https://www.hudexchange.info/programs/environmental-review/tieredenvironmental-reviews/ OEE Staff Contact Information https://www.hudexchange.info/programs/environmental-review/hudenvironmental-staff-contacts/#headquarters-environmental-staff HEROS How To Videos https://www.hudexchange.info/environmental-review/heros-e-tutorials/ HEROS https://heros.hud.gov 50

Summary Evaluations Feedback survey link and instructions to get credit in LMS will be emailed to you 51

Thank you for your participation! 52