Ten Years of DCRC: Where We ve Been and Challenges for the Next 10 Years. Jeffrey S. Stevenson and William W. Thatcher

Similar documents
TEN YEARS OF DCRC: WHERE WE VE BEEN AND CHALLENGES FOR THE NEXT 10 YEARS Jeffrey S. Stevenson 1 and William W. Thatcher 2 1

Reproductive Management of Dairy Heifers

Reproductive Management of Dairy Heifers

Pregnancy Rate. The Value of Good Reproduction. 21-day Pregnancy Rate. Goal of Reproductive Program

Dairy Herd Synchronization Programs. William M. Graves Extension Dairy Scientist

Estrus Synchronization in Dairy Cattle

Setting up Lactating Dairy Cows for First Postpartum Timed AI

TAKE HOME MESSAGES Illinois Parameter < 18,000 18,000 22,000 > 22,000

Industry Presentation Ten Lessons That We Have Learned about Systematic Breeding Programs for Dairy Cattle

Aggressive Management Strategies for Improving Reproductive Efficiency

New Information on Timed Breeding Protocols for Lactating Dairy Cows

Using Resynchronization Programs

Reproductive Programs for Florida Dairy Herds

Staff Paper. Department of Agricultural, Food, and Resource Economics MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY East Lansing, Michigan 48824

Strategies and Rationale for Resynchronization of Ovulation in Lactating Dairy Cows

Department of Dairy Science, University of Wisconsin-Madison, 1675 Observatory Dr., Madison, WI 53706, U. S. A.

Reproduction management and its economic value

Minnesota Dairy Health Conference. May 19-20, 2010 St. Paul, Minnesota

Economic comparison of natural service and timed artificial insemination breeding programs in dairy cattle

APPLICATION OF THE PROGESTERONE (CIDR) INSERT IN ARTIFICIAL INSEMINATION PROGRAMS OF DAIRY CATTLE. J. S. Stevenson

Pregnant vs. Open: Getting Cows Pregnant and the Money it Makes

The benefits of genotyping at farm level & the impact across the wider dairy herd in Ireland. Kevin Downing 27 th October, 2016

ARSBC 2016, Des Moines, IA 1

Efficiency Comparison between Two Systematic Breeding Protocols: Target Breeding and Presynchronization Program At a Large Central Valley Dairy Farm

Fertility Management on the Greenfield Farm in 2012

Estrous Synchronization Programs for Dairy Cows and Heifers

Development of an Economic Breeding Index EBI for Ireland. Ross Evans (ICBF)

National DHIA Annual Meeting CDCB Report

An Economic Comparison of AI and Bull Breeding

11/30/2018. Introduction to Genomic Selection OUTLINE. 1. What is different between pedigree based and genomic selection? 2.

Management Strategies to Improve Fertility in Lactating Dairy Cows

Farm Management Decisions in the Era of Genomics

Zoetis Expands Genetics Portfolio With Calf Wellness Traits in Clarifide Plus

Pregnancy Rates. Jack C. Whittier Colorado State University. !I am not an economist and I do not. ! Biology and interactions

Estrous synchronization programs for the dairy herd

AN UPDATE ON TIMED-AI (TAI) PROGRAMS FOR DAIRY CATTLE

Cost Analysis of Implementing a Synchronization or AI Program-Using Decision-Aid Tools

The Underlying Physiology Changing Reproduction in Lactating Dairy Cows

Big Data, Science and Cow Improvement: The Power of Information!

Improving fertility through management and genetics.

Issues and challenges in improving dairy genetics for smallholders. Badi Besbes, Animal Production and Health Division, FAO

IMPACTS OF ESTROUS SYNCHRONIZATION ON COWHERD PERFORMANCE

Systematic Synchronization and Resynchronization Systems for Reproductive Management of Lactating Dairy Cows

Genomic selection in cattle industry: achievements and impact

Effects of heat stress on reproduction in cattle

Estrus Synchronization Planning for Success

Proceedings, Applied Reproductive Strategies in Beef Cattle November 1 and 2, 2005, Lexington, Kentucky ESTRUS SYNCHRONIZATION SYSTEMS - COWS

What does it Take to Start an AI Program? G. C. Lamb, Professor 1

TWENTY YEARS OF GENETIC PROGRESS IN AUSTRALIAN HOLSTEINS

Decoding genomic selection and the benefit for unconventional traits

Beef Systems Approaches to Production Management

2/22/2012. Impact of Genomics on Dairy Cattle Breeding. Basics of the DNA molecule. Genomic data revolutionize dairy cattle breeding

Reproductive Management in Beef Herds. Marcos G. Colazo Dairy Research Scientist Alberta Agriculture & Rural Development Edmonton, Alberta, Canada

CDCB tools for the improvement of the Jersey breed

THE 30-DAY GAME CHANGER: IMPROVING REPRODUCTIVE EFFICIENCY AND PROFITABILITY OF BEEF HERDS. G. Cliff Lamb

Economics of Improving Reproductive Performance in Dairy Herds

Washington Animal Agriculture Team

Economic return from use of fixed-time artificial insemination (FTAI) in a genetic improvement programme

SYNCHRONIZATION OF OVULATION BASED ON STAGES OF FOLLICULAR AND CORPORA LUTEA DEVELOPMENT IN LACTATING DAIRY COWS DIAGNOSED NOT-PREGNANT.

Factors To Improve Reproductive Management and Getting Cows Pregnant

Current Reality of the Ayrshire Breed and the Opportunity of Technology for Future Growth

MANAGING THE REPLACEMENT HERD

Proceedings, The State of Beef Conference November 4 and 5, 2014, North Platte, Nebraska BEEF PRODUCTION WITHOUT MATURE COWS

Association of Genomic Selection with Culling and Replacements

Where can the greatest economic value of genomic testing be found?

Management Strategies to Optimize Reproductive Performance of Dairy Herds

Reproductive Efficiency and Economics of Timed AI vs. Natural Service

Genetic improvement: a major component of increased dairy farm profitability

GENOMICS AND YOUR DAIRY HERD

Effects of Early and Late Fall Calving of Beef Cows on Gestation Length and Pregnancy Rate

Creating Premium Beef Maximizing Dairy Profit

Culling and Replacement Strategies. Stable to declining herd. Under the magnifying lens 2/20/2012. Matt Lippert Wood Co.

ICBF Database & Management Reporting. Mark Waters

2018 Protocols for Synchronization of Estrus and Ovulation in Beef Cows and Heifers

Jack Kelly Clark DAIRY INCENTIVE PAY. 4 th Edition

CULLING: REPLACEMENT HEIFER STRATEGIES

Using Genomics to Improve the Genetic Potential and Management of Your Herd

Chapter 1 INTRODUCTION. Cattle ranchers have long faced the problem of dealing with heifers calving for their first

RELATIONSHIPS AMONG UDDER SHAPE, UDDER CAPACITY, COW LONGEVITY AND CALF WEIGHTS ~

EVALUATING SEMEN FERTILITY OF ARTIFICIAL INSEMINATION SIRES. R. W. EVERETT, USA Department of Animal Science Cornell University Ithaca, NY

Timing of artificial insemination in postpartum beef cows following administration of the CO-Synch + controlled internal drug-release protocol 1

Why Crossbreed?? Dr. Tom Lawlor, Holstein USA

Impact of Dry Period Length

The new infrastructure for cattle and sheep breeding in Ireland.

Raising the Bar on Calf & Heifer Feeding & Management. Jim Barmore, M.Sc., PAS Nutrition & Management Consulting Verona, WI

Fertility Factors. Factors that influence fertility in natural and synchronized breeding programs.

Introduction. Data collection and evaluation activities

Factors Affecting Breeding Success

Internal Herd Growth and Heifer Programs: Keep Them Alive and Get Them Pregnant on Time

Dairy Cattle Development in China

COMPARISON OF BREEDING SYSTEM COSTS FOR ESTRUS-SYNCHRONIZATION PROTOCOLS PLUS ARTIFICIAL INSEMINATION VERSUS NATURAL SERVICE

Estrus Synchronization in Beef Cattle

THIS ARTICLE IS SPONSORED BY THE MINNESOTA DAIRY HEALTH CONFERENCE.

Genex Cooperative, Inc.

Delivering Valued Genomic Products to Livestock Customers

GENETIC CONSIDERATIONS FOR HEIFER FERTILITY DR. HEATHER J. HUSON ROBERT & ANNE EVERETT ENDOWED PROFESSORSHIP OF DAIRY CATTLE GENETICS

An integrated approach to expand marketing. producers from value-added heifers and steers

Alison Van Eenennaam, Ph.D.

Best Practice Guide on Reproduction

Value of cooperative phenotypic databases in the genomics era

Transcription:

Ten Years of DCRC: Where We ve Been and Challenges for the Next 10 Years Jeffrey S. Stevenson and William W. Thatcher

The 21 st century began with... Common belief that dairy cow fertility was on the decline. Reproductive performance of cows was critical to survival of individual dairy operations. Reasons for decline in fertility were neither completely understood nor elucidated.

Fertility in NY and Irish dairy herds... Lucy, 2001

Trends in dairy cows since 1960... Percentage or yield (kg) 100 80 60 40 20 First service pregnancy rate (%) Standing-to-be mounted (%) Milk yield (kg) 0 1960 1965 1970 1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2010 Year Hobson et al. 2008

United Kingdom calving rate of dairy cows decreasing 1% per year... Last dairy calf will be born in 2045! Royal et al., 2000

Despite this negative trend... Research in reproductive physiology led to significant advances. For example: GnRH PGF 2α 0 d 7 d

Despite this negative trend... Research in reproductive physiology led to significant advances during the 1990 s. J. Anim. Sci. 1995. 73:3141 3151 GnRH PGF 2α 0 d 6 d

Despite this negative trend... Research in reproductive physiology led to significant advances. 50 40 30 20 10 0 41 37 P/AI (%) 45 Conception rate Calving rate 41 32 0 8 16 24 32 TAI at 0, 8, 16, 24, or 32 h after GnRH GnRH PGF 2α GnRH 0 d 7 d 9 d

Missing link... Mechanism for communicating more effectively the novel new research-proven programs and technologies to: Dairy veterinarians Dairy producers Dairy industry business and technical service reps

Key individuals... Dr. Austin Belschner, Pfizer Animal Health Dr. Bill Thatcher, University of Florida Dr. Jim Lauderdale, Lauderdale Enterprises Dr. Jose Santos, University of California-Davis Dr. Gary Heinrich, Pfizer Animal Health Dr. Fred Moreira, Pfizer Animal Health Dr. Ellen Jordan, Texas A&M University

Formal invitation... In 2005, a formal invitation was sent to a select group of individuals associated with the dairy industry. Objective: to convene a group representing various segments of the dairy industry to create a national forum and organization devoted to improving fertility.

Invitees to the 2005 Forum... Invitees Affiliation Invitees Affiliation Invitees Affiliation Academia Allied industry Practicing veterinarians Jose Santos UC-Davis Fred Moreira Pfizer Animal Health John Lee California Bill Thatcher Univ. Florida Austin Belschner Pfizer Animal Health Lee Jones Veterinarian Ellen Jordan Texas A&M Chris Roeder Pfizer Animal Health Dairy producers Jeff Stevenson Kansas State Gary Heinrich Pfizer Animal Health Donald Niles Casco, WI Matt Lucy Missouri Barry Putnam Genex Jack DeJong Visalia, CA Mike Overton UC-Davis Dave Brister Intervet Schering Plough Mike Schouten Hereford, TX Milo Wiltbank Wisconsin Jim Lauderdale Lauderdale Enterprises Paul Fricke Wisconsin Myron Brown Merial Richard Pursley Michigan State Joe Dedrickson Merial Neil Michaels ABS Global Dave Prentice ABS Global Phil Modesitt Church & Dwight Ray Nebel Select Sires Ricardo Mattos Monsanto Co. Richard Markham Phoenix Scientific Daniel Luchini NutriScience St. Louis Sheraton Westport Hotel October 17-18, 2005

Preliminary vision... Vision: To increase adoption of reproductive technologies by dairy producers to counteract the observed decrease in dairy cattle fertility. Objective: Promote direct communication between those who develop technology and products (researchers, consultants, and commercial companies) and those who would benefit from such technology (dairy practitioners and producers). Initial plan: Emulate a successful model organization such as the National Mastitis Council (NMC).

Forum agenda... Current status of reproductive performance in dairy cows (Bill Thatcher) Preliminary vision for an applied reproduction group (Jose Santos) Group discussions to develop a vision statement and objectives of an organization National Mastitis Council (NMC) history and critical success factors (Gary Heinrich) Where do we go from here? Summary and action list (Jim Lauderdale)

Forum results... Named the organization: Dairy Cattle Reproduction Council Drafted By-Laws (2005; later revised in 2014) Elected Officers: President: Jose Santos Vice president: Ray Nebel Secretary: Andy Skidmore Treasurer: Austin Belschner Organized the first meeting: Nov. 2006 in Denver

Subsequent DCRC changes... In 2014, we amended the By-Laws to include verbiage about responsibilities of officers, board members, and perpetuating committees. Granted legal status as a public charity under Section 501(c)(3) by the IRS financed by a gift of $5,000 from the American Dairy Science Association.

Current legal status... The DCRC is organized exclusively for charitable, educational, and scientific purposes to: Provide services to the dairy industry Facilitate the dissemination of scientific and technical information. The DCRC can accept gifts and grants for financing the promotion of its educational role.

Reflections... First officers and board were unsung heroes. Charleston-Orwig (C O) Early management Bovine Veterinarian Initial newsletters Casey Hushon Marcy Tessmann Mike Opperman Federation of Animal Science Societies (FASS) Regional meetings held by sponsors contributed to attendance at DCRC. Cara Tharp Jamie Ritter

Kudos... Andy Skidmore served as Secretary of DCRC during our first 8 years. Single-handedly managed the DCRC Reproduction Awards with the able assistance of Jim Ferguson, who analyzed the raw data submitted by the finalists.

Kudos to our sponsors... ABS Global DFA Micro Accelerated Genetics DHI-Provo Monsanto Afimilk DSM Nutritional Products MultiMin AgriLabs E.I. Medical imaging Parnell Animart Elanco Partners in Reproduction Arm & Hammer Anim. Nutr. Estrotect Pine Creek Nutrition Services Arun P. Phatak GEA REPRO RESULTS Balchem Hoard s Dairyman SCR Dairy BCF Technology IDEXX Select Sires Bayer IntelliBond Semex BioTracking, LLC Intervet/Schering-Plough Valley Ag Software Bovine Veterinarian IVS Animal Health Virtus Nutrition Charleston Orwig Merck Animal Health Zinpro DeLaval Merial Zoetis (Pfizer Animal Health)

Kudos to our past presidents... Jose Santos University of Florida 2006 2007 Ray Nebel Select Sires 2007 2008 Matt Lucy University of Missouri 2008 2009 Ricardo Chebel University of Florida 2009 2010 Gene Boomer Church & Dwight 2010 2011 Tom Bailey Elanco 2011 2012 Jeff Stevenson Kansas State University 2012 2013 Neil Michael Progressive Dairyman 2013 2014 Joe Dalton University of Idaho 2014 2015 Stephen LeBlanc University of Guelph 2015 2016

Attendance at annual meetings... % 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 2006 2007 2008

Speaker topics... Heifer growth 2% Sire fertility 1.8% Labor 1.2% Nutrition 1.8% Behavior-welfare 3.0% Uterine health 3.7% Activity monitors 3.7% Data mgmt 3.7% Pregnancy loss 4% Heifer AI mgmt 5% Sexed semen Heat stress 1.2% 1.2% Pregnancy diagnosis 6% Healthvaccines 1.2% Repro Mgmt 11.0% Genetics 8.5% Global issues Cow 7.3% comfort 7.3% Economics 7.3% Obstetricscalving 1.2% Transition cow 7.9% Estrus behaviordetection 1.2% Synchronization 7.9%

DCRC services... Reproductive AI protocols Newsletters 6 webinars Annual meeting Regular memberships E-memberships Networking opportunities

Genetic selection differentials in US Holsteins resulting from genomic selection... Averrage predicted breeding value 10 8 6 4 2 0 1985 1995 2005 2015-2 Daughter pregnancy rate (DPR) Cow birth year Generation interval for sires of bulls reduced from 7 to < 2.5 yr and dams of bulls from 4 to 2.5 yr. Selection differentiations were relatively stable for yield traits; modest gains in recent years. Most dramatic response to genomic selection was observed for the lowly heritable traits: DPR, productive life, and SCS. Rates of genetic gain per yr increased from 50 to 100% for yield traits and from 3- to 4-fold for lowly heritable traits. Garcia-Ruiz et al. 2016. PNAS.

Summary GnRH PGF 2α 1983 1980 1979 Commercially available in the U.S. First U.S. patent for pedometer Resynch Presynch Ovsynch 1995 1999 Timed AI options 3-D accelerometer to detect activity 2000 CIDR 2003 2005 Genomic data included in sire summaries Sexed semen 2007 DCRC founded 2011 First ear tag-based health and activity monitoring device with temperature

Future of the DCRC depends on... Increasing our traditional and e-memberships Willingness of members to serve in leadership roles Active participation in our committees: Awards Education Membership Finance and sponsorship Program Nomination and Policy-Legal (past presidents)

Future of the DCRC... Current advancements to improve reproductive performance of dairy cattle reflects the challenge of integrating the disciplines of: Physiology Nutrition Genetics (genomics) Economics Production medicine

Future of the DCRC... Continued and future progress in the areas of: Cell biology Nutraceuticals to optimize reproductive function and lactation Novel and biocompatible delivery systems of biological regulatory factors Genomic selection Application of technologies to monitor biologic functions of cows and forecast treatment-management interventions Viable calves produced from optimal uterine environment

Thanks to our sponsors... Platinum Sponsor Bronze Sponsors Gold Sponsors Award Sponsor

Authors acknowledgments... Casey Hushon, C O Andy Skidmore, DCRC member

Final thoughts... The dairy cow as the Foster Mother of the Human Race is a wonderful biologic model and food producer for mankind!

The end of the first 10 yr and the beginning of an even brighter DCRC future... Thank you!