NITROGEN, SULFUR, POTASSIUM AND PHOSPHORUS FERTILIZATION IN ALFALFA WHEN ARE THEY NECESSARY? Richard T. Koenig 1 ABSTRACT

Similar documents
Nutrient Management for Hay Production and Quality

Soil Fertility Management for Forage Crops: Maintenance

TESTING ALFALFA FOR PHOSPHORUS AND POTASSIUM NUTRIENT DEFICIENCIES. Jerry L. Schmierer, Roland D. Meyer and Daniel H. Putnam 1

Fertility and Crop Nutrition. B. Linquist, R. Mutters, J. Hill and C. vankessel Rice Production Workshop, March 21, 2011

DRYLAND WINTER WHEAT: EASTERN WASHINGTON NUTRIENT MANAGEMENT GUIDE

Fertilizer and Nutrient Management of Timothy Hay

THE BENEFITS OF MANAGING MANURES WITH ALFALFA. Roland D. Meyer

Irrigated Pastures. Southern Idaho Fertilizer Guide. Introduction. Nutrient Distribution and Cycling in Grazed Pastures

MANAGEMENT OF MANURES IN CORN AND SORGHUM. Robert Flynn 1 ABSTRACT

NUTRIENT MANAGEMENT PLAN FIELD MONITORING 1. Bradford D. Brown ABSTRACT

MILLING WHEAT FERTILITY MANAGEMENT. Gene Aksland 1 ABSTRACT

Soil Testing for P and K in Annual Crops

Soil fertility management for pepper production

Editor: Robert Waggener

Inoculants and Nutrient Management of Pulses May 25, 2017 Ag Agent Update, Havre

NUTRIENT MANAGEMENT. Figure 1. The availability of P is affected by soil ph.

FERTILIZATION OF FORAGES. Wheatland County May 19, Clain Jones

Keeping the Grass Greener on Your Side of the Fence Understanding Pasture Fertility

Soil Fertility and Forage Availability. Travis Harper Agronomy Specialist University of Missouri Extension

Nutrient Management of Pulses and Fertilization during and after Drought January 8-11, 2018

FACTORS AFFECTING CROP NEEDS FOR POTASSIUM WESTERN PERSPECTIVE TERRY A. TINDALL AND DALE WESTERMANN MANAGER OF AGRONOMY J.R

Do not oven-dry the soil

Pulse Crop Fertilizer Needs July 11, 2013 NE MT Pulse Crop Tour, Richland

G Fertilizing Winter Wheat I: Nitrogen, Potassium, and Micronutrients

PASTURE AND HAY FIELDS: SOIL FERTILITY MANAGEMENT. Sanders County April 8, Clain Jones

extension.missouri.edu Archive version -- See Using Your Soil Test Results

Alfalfa Fertility. Brian Arnall Precision Nutrient Management Dept. Plant and Soil Sciences

Recommendations in this nutrient management

Fertilizer Management

The Application of Petiole Analyses to Sugar Beet Fertilization

Nutrient Management of Forages and Legumes Crop Pest Management School Bozeman, January 6, 2010

Fertilizer Recommendations for S.D. Crops

Subsection 3D: Nutrient Recommendations Forage Crops

Fertility Research Updates. Frank Yin Department of Plant Sciences University of Tennessee

Fertilizing Small Grains in Arizona

Soil and Nutrient Management of. alfalfa. Ensuring adequate soil fertility levels and effectively. Soil sampling and testing: when, where and how

NUTRIENT AVAILABILITY TO CORN FROM DAIRY MANURES AND FERTILIZER IN A CALCAREOUS SOIL

TRI-STATE FERTILIZER UPDATE

Fertility Management of Soybeans

MANAGING FERTILITY FOR PROTEIN IN SMALL GRAINS

Nutrient Removal by Crops

Organic Fertilizer Calculator

Fertilizing Corn in Minnesota

Irrigated Spring Wheat

FERTILIZER SOURCES Extension Agent Agronomy College September 24, 2014

Balancing the Nitrogen Budget

Nitrogen and Phosphorus Fertilization of Corn

LAGOON WATER, MANURES AND BIOSOLIDS APPLIED TO ALFALFA: PROS AND CONS. Roland D. Meyer, Blake L. Sanden and Khaled M.

Applying Dairy Lagoon Water to Alfalfa

Optimizing Fertilizer Applications on Sugar Beet. Jay Norton Soil Fertility Specialist University of Wyoming

Forage Fertilization Based on Yield and Management Goals

PRINCIPLES OF RECYCLING DAIRY MANURES THROUGH FORAGE CROPS. Marsha Campbell Mathews 1

The Potash Development Association Grain Legumes need Potash

Optimizing Fertilizer Applications on Big Horn Basin Crops

Characterization of Solid Beef Manure

Fertility Management of Processing Tomato

FERTILITY RECOMMENDATIONS

Getting the most out of your N fertilizer $ Prepared for 2013 Montana/Wyoming Barley and Sugarbeet Symposium

Guidelines for Safe Rates of Fertilizer Placed with the Seed

PHOSPHORUS AND POTASSIUM FERTILIZATION OF ALFALFA

OSU Soil Test Interpretations

FUTURE OF TRI-STATE FERTILIZER RECOMMENDATIONS

With High Fertilizer Prices. Gerald Bryan Extension Agronomist UM Extension Jackson, MO

FERTILIZING SUGARBEET

NUTRIENT MANAGEMENT. philosophy/approach for determining N rate guidelines for corn.

CANADA DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE PUBLICATION

ALFALFA YIELD GAP HOW BIG IS IT AND WHAT IS ITS ECONOMIC SIGNIFICANCE? Michael Russelle 1

Pulse Crop Inoculation and Fertilization January 13, 2017 Hill County Extension Pulse Workshop

Michael P. Russellel ABSTRACT

Effect of Fertilizers on Yield and Quality of Potatoes in the. Willamette Valley AGRICULTURAL EXPERIMENT STATION

Cotton Fertilization on Black Belt Soils - - Results of 2002 and 2003 On-farm Tests

Application of Nitrogen for Grass Seed Production -- Does It Still Pay?

SOIL TEST N FOR PREDICTING ONION N REQUIREMENTS - AN IDAHO PERSPECTIVE. Brad Brown, University of Idaho Parma Research and Extension Center

Fertilizing High Producing Alfalfa Stands

Poultry production is the number one agricultural

Sugarbeet Response to Nitrogen Fertilizer Rates K.A. Rykbost and R.L. Dovell

Manure Management Facts Managing Manure within Tillage Systems and Crop Rotations

Nitrogen Fertilization of Sugar Beets In the Woodland Area of California 1

Saving on Nitrogen Costs with Forages. Brie Menjoulet Agronomy Specialist

Effect of Method of Phosphorus Application. Willamette 16 Valley "Red Hill" Soil. Agricultural Experiment Station Oregon State University Corvallis

NUTRIENT MANAGEMENT WHAT S DOABLE. John E. Sawyer Associate Professor Soil Fertility Extension Specialist Department of Agronomy Iowa State University

Get Ready for RAPs: Nutrient Management Planning for Vegetable Farms. Becky Maden, UVM Extension VVGBA Annual Meeting January 25, 2016

Knowledge grows. The Nutrition of Almonds

Managing Soils for Improved Pasture

WATER ALLOCATION STRATEGIES WHEN IRRIGATION SUPPLIES ARE LIMITED. Dr. Howard Neibling, P.E. 1 ABSTRACT

AGRICULTURAL EXPERIMENT STATION Oregon State College Wm. A. Schoenfeld, Director Corvallis SOIL, NUTRIENT, AND IRRIGATION REQUIREMENTS OF FIBER FLAX

Northwest Regional Certified Crop Adviser

Soil Quality, Nutrient Cycling and Soil Fertility. Ray Ward Ward Laboratories, Inc Kearney, NE

Understanding Salt Index of Fertilizers. Carrie Laboski Department of Soil Science University of Wisconsin-Madison

Cover Crop Contributions to Nitrogen Fertility

Reed Canarygrass Response to Nitrogen and Chloride Fertilization

Pasture Management- Fertility. Brie Menjoulet Agronomy Specialist Hermitage, MO

IRRIGATION WATER QUALITY IN TREE NURSERIES IN THE INLAND WEST. T.D. Landis USDA Forest Service Western Nursery Specialist Lakewood, Colorado

Fertility Management in Forages

ALFALFA FERTILITY AND COMPOST MANAGEMENT. Glenn E. Shewmaker 1 and Jason Ellsworth RATIONALE

Clovers.. 75 pounds of "N" per acre

Evaluating Soil Nutrients and ph by Depth

Time and Method of Fertilizer Application

SULFUR AND NITROGEN FOR PROTEIN BUILDING

SOIL ACIDIFICATION. Clain Jones ) Rick Engel )

Transcription:

NITROGEN, SULFUR, POTASSIUM AND PHOSPHORUS FERTILIZATION IN ALFALFA WHEN ARE THEY NECESSARY? Richard T. Koenig 1 ABSTRACT Determining when applications of nitrogen (N), sulfur (S), potassium (K) and phosphorus (P) fertilizer are needed is important to maintain alfalfa yield and quality. The Western U.S. is diverse in terms of climate, soil types, irrigation water need and availability, historical nutrient use and alfalfa production systems. Therefore, few generalizations hold regarding the timing and location of N, S, K and P deficiencies. Soil and tissue testing are the most reliable ways to assess alfalfa nutrient status and determine fertilizer needs. Soil test extractants and interpretations vary throughout the West. Growers must understand what soil test methods (mainly sampling depth and chemical extractants) are appropriate for their area and use interpretations (recommendation tables) developed for those methods. Tissue testing procedures and interpretations are more similar throughout the West, but growers must still match tissue sampling protocols (mainly growth stage and plant part) with the interpretation data. In this paper, summary information on critical soil and tissue test levels is presented, as well as recent alfalfa fertilizer response data from the Western U.S. Key Words: alfalfa, nitrogen, sulfur, potassium, phosphorus, fertilization INTRODUCTION Alfalfa is the most common legume forage crop grown in the Western States. As recently as 1997, over 32 million tons of alfalfa was grown on approximately 7.4 million acres in the West (Morgan, 1997). In addition to its economic importance, alfalfa also fills an important rotational niche in Western agriculture. Being a deep rooted crop, alfalfa can scavenge nutrients remaining after the growth of less efficient, shallow rooted crops. Rotating out of alfalfa also provides a nitrogen source for following crops as the root system decomposes. Due to the economic and agronomic importance of alfalfa in the West, a considerable amount of inorganic fertilizer is applied to this crop. Determining when applications of nitrogen (N), sulfur (S), potassium (K) and phosphorus (P) are needed is important to insure adequate alfalfa yield and quality. Over-generalizations made about the occurrence of N, S, K and P deficiencies are dangerous. Western U.S. climates, soil types, historical nutrient use patterns and alfalfa production systems are highly variable and directly impact the need for N, S, K and P. Therefore, some form of soil and tissue testing program must be used to identify deficiencies and monitor the nutrient status of alfalfa over time. 1 R. Koenig, Extension Soil Specialist, Plants, Soils and Biometeorology Department, Utah State University, 4820 Old Main Hill, Logan, UT 84322-4820; Email: richk@ext.usu.edu. In: Proceedings, Western Alfalfa and Forage Conference, 11-13 December, 2002, Spraks, NV, UC Cooperative Extension, University of California, Davis, 95616. (see http://alfalfa.ucdavis.edu)

The purpose of this paper is to briefly describe situations where N, S, K and P deficiencies may occur, the visual appearance of these deficiencies, and critical soil and tissue test levels for defining deficiencies and determining fertilizer application rates. Some data from recent alfalfa fertility trials is presented to illustrate the importance of monitoring the nutrient status of alfalfa and making fertilizer applications when necessary. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION Nitrogen (N). Alfalfa is a legume and through a symbiotic relationship with bacteria obtains N required for growth from the atmosphere. Most references acknowledge that, during establishment and before bacterial symbiosis develops, a small amount of N is beneficial (Mortvedt et al., 1996; Koenig et al., 2001). This recommendation is applied when soil N prior to planting is below critical levels (Table 1). Applications of larger amounts of N during establishment are thought to inhibit bacterial colonization of the root system and may reduce the growth of mature alfalfa plants. Table 1. Summary of basic N fertility data and recommendations for alfalfa. 1 Data Nitrogen removal by alfalfa Critical tissue concentration Visual deficiency symptoms Situations where deficiency may be observed Critical soil test value for new stands at establishment Fertilizer recommendation for new stands Value or recommendation approximately 60 lb N per ton of hay 3 to 4% N (whole tops, 1/10 bloom) 4 to 5% N (top 1/3 of plant, 1/10 bloom) Light green, stunted plants, low protein cold soils, uninoculated or ineffective inoculation, low ph, stress Less than 15 ppm NO 3 or Less than 3 or 4 ppm NO 3 -N 20 to 40 lb N/acre Fertilizer recommendation for established generally not recommended stands 1 Data taken from the Western Fertilizer Handbook (California Plant Health Association, 2002) and various state extension publications referenced at the end of this paper. Nitrogen application in established alfalfa stands is still controversial. An excellent review of N fertilization of alfalfa was published by researchers at Oregon State University (Hannaway and Shuler, 1993). In this review, the authors reported on dozens of studies evaluating alfalfa yield and protein responses to N fertilization. Few of the studies found any positive effects of N fertilization on established alfalfa; however, enough studies have shown a yield and/or protein response to N fertilization to warrant consideration. Situations in which alfalfa may respond to N fertilization appear to include poor or ineffective nodulation due to use of the wrong, old or damaged inoculant, and stresses that can reduce nodulation or bacterial activity. Stresses can include low soil ph (acid soils), extreme hot or cold soil temperatures, and drought or salinity

stress. If producers suspect low rates of N fixation in alfalfa stands they should first try to identify the cause and then consider on farm testing to determine whether fields will respond to N fertilization. Sulfur (S). Sulfur is an important component of several amino acids and has been shown to influence the yield, protein content, stand density and stand life of alfalfa. Yield responses of up to 300% have been reported under severe S deficiency conditions; however, more typical yield responses to S fertilization are in the range of 15% to 25%. Early research (Westermann, 1974, 1975) established critical tissue S and soil sulfate-s (SO 4 -S) concentrations for alfalfa grown in the Western U.S. (Table 1). More recent recommendations are based on soil test results (Koenig et al., 2001) or an annual need established by local research (Gardner et al., 2000). Table 2. Summary of basic S fertility data and recommendations for alfalfa. 1 Data Sulfur removal by alfalfa Critical tissue concentration Visual deficiency symptoms Situations where deficiency may be observed Critical soil test value Value or recommendation 5 lb S per ton of hay 0.20 to 0.25% S (whole tops, 1/10 bloom) 0.25 to 0.30% (top 1/3 of plant, 1/10 bloom) Light green color, stunted plants, thin stems, low protein content sandy, low organic matter soils, high elevation and/or high rainfall locations Less than 25 ppm SO 4 or Less than 8 ppm SO 4 -S Fertilizer recommendation 20 to 40 lb S/acre 1 Data taken from the Western Fertilizer Handbook (California Plant Health Association, 2002) and various state extension publications referenced at the end of this paper. Many high elevation areas have been found to be low in S. High precipitation coupled with low irrigation water S concentrations and a history of high yielding alfalfa production explain the occurrence of these deficiencies. A recent comparison of sulfur sources and rates at two locations in Utah showed responses on the order of 16 to 20% above an unfertilized control with various sources of sulfur (Figure 1). Initial soil test SO 4 -S ranged from 3.0 to 3.5 ppm. Sulfur sources included ammonium sulfate (AMS), potassium-magnesium sulfate (K-MAG), potassium sulfate (SOP), potassium polysulfide (K-Sul) and ammonium polysulfide (N-Sul). Yield (tons acre -1 ) 3.5 3.3 3.1 2.9 2.7 2.5 Control Cache Garfield AMS K-Mag SOP K-Sul N-Sul Figure 1. Effect of S source on alfalfa yield in 2001 (Koenig, unpublished data).

Potassium (K). More K is removed than any other nutrient except N by alfalfa (Table 3). Potassium deficiency, however, is a relatively recent occurrence in the West. In the mid-1950s, fertilizer guides from Utah State University declared that no K deficiencies existed due to the high native levels of K in Utah soils and high K concentrations in many irrigation waters (Nielson et al., 1955). Fertilizer guides from other Western States contain similar statements. A long history of high-yielding alfalfa production has depleted native soil K levels to the extent that most Western States now encourage testing for K and make K fertilizer recommendations. Table 3. Summary of basic K fertility data and recommendations for alfalfa. 1 Data Potassium removal by alfalfa Value or recommendation 60 lb K 2 O per ton of hay or 50 lb K per tons of hay Critical tissue concentration 2.0% (whole tops, 1/10 bloom) 2.5 to 3.5% (top 1/3 of plant, 1/10 bloom) Visual deficiency symptoms Situations where deficiency may be observed Critical soil test value ( Olsen or sodium bicarbonate extract method) thin stands, leaf margin necrosis (dead spots on outer edges of leaves), low stress tolerance sandy soils, high elevations, sites with a long history of alfalfa production Soil test level (ppm) Less than 150 ppm K lb K 2 O per acre 0 to 40 300 Fertilizer recommendations 40 to 70 250 70 to 100 150 100 to 150 100 above 150 0 1 Data taken from the Western Fertilizer Handbook (California Plant Health Association, 2002) and various state extension publications referenced at the end of this paper. Soil test extractants for K include sodium bicarbonate ( Olsen extract), ammonium bicarbonate and ammonium acetate. Soil test procedures for K, like P, are reliable indicators of deficiencies and fertilizer requirements. Recent research from Utah State University showed alfalfa yield responses to relatively high K application rates on low K-testing soils (Figure 2). Due to the high K requirements of alfalfa, frequent and relatively high rates of K fertilizer will be required to maintain high yields once native soil levels are depleted.

16 14 12 Yield (tons acre -1 ) 10 8 6 4 2 0 0 200 400 600 600 Split Potassium rate (lb K 2 O acre -1 ) Figure 2. The effect of K rate on alfalfa yield at a Utah State University Research Farm. Data are from 1999. The 600 split application consisted of 200 lb K 2 O per acre applied in April, and 200 lb K 2 O per acre applied after the first and second cuttings. Initial soil test K was 73 ppm. Data are from Koenig et al. (2002). Phosphorus (P). Phosphorus is essential for alfalfa production and likely represents the most common fertilizer input for this crop across the Western U.S. Phosphorus recommendations in Western States with alkaline-calcareous soils are based on a sodium bicarbonate (NaHCO 3 ) extractant or Olsen test (Table 4). Correlations between soil test P and alfalfa yield are normally very good for the Olsen P test (Figure 3). These relationships are used to identify the critical soil test P above which fertilizer recommendations are not made (Table 4). Fertilizer guides from most Western State recommend that P be applied and incorporated before establishing an alfalfa crop. Since P is relatively immobile, placement below the soil surface improves root access and prevents P from being stranded on the surface of dry soil. When P needs are identified for established alfalfa, application as soon as possible is recommended. Various P fertilizer sources are available in the Western U.S. Research has generally found that conventional dry (11-52-0, 0-45-0) and liquid (10-34-0, phosphoric acid) fertilizer sources are equally effective for alfalfa (Figure 4). Selection of a P fertilizer source should be based on availability and cost per pound of P 2 O 5.

Table 4. Summary of basic P fertility data and recommendations for alfalfa. 1 Data Phosphorus removal by alfalfa Critical tissue concentration Visual deficiency symptoms Situations where deficiency may be observed Critical soil test value ( Olsen or sodium bicarbonate extract method) Value or recommendation 15 lb P 2 O 5 per ton of hay or 6.5 lb P per ton of hay 0.20 to 0.25% (whole tops, 1/10 bloom) 0.25 to 0.35% (top 1/3 of plant, 1/10 bloom) Dark green or blueish color, stunted plants, thin stems, weedy stands anywhere inorganic fertilizer or manure has not been applied recently Less than 15 ppm P Soil test level (ppm) lb P 2 O 5 per acre 0 to 3 200 to 250 Fertilizer recommendations 4 to 7 150 to 200 8 to 10 100 to 150 11 to 15 50 to 100 above 15 0 1 Data taken from the Western Fertilizer Handbook (California Plant Health Association, 2002) and various state extension publications referenced at the end of this paper. 110 100 % Maximum Yield 90 80 70 60 50 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 Soil test phosphorus (ppm) Figure 3. Relationship between soil test phosphorus (Olsen method) and percent maximum alfalfa yield. Data are from 3 sites over 2 years (Koenig et al., 1999).

Yield (tons acre -1 ) 10 8 6 4 1998 1999 Sevier 1999 2000 Iron 2 0 Control 0-45-0 Acid Control 0-45-0 11-52-0 Acid Figure 4. The effect of P fertilizer source on alfalfa yield at 2 locations. Phosphorus was applied at a rate of 150 or 230 lb P 2 O 5 per acre for each source. Data from Reid et al. (in press). ON FARM TESTING AND RECORD KEEPING The role and importance of on farm testing and record keeping cannot be overstated when developing an alfalfa fertility program. Different soils respond differently to fertilization in terms of the initial and long-term impacts on soil test levels and crop response. Also, different yield levels will require different amounts of fertilizer inputs over time. The soil and tissue test information presented in this paper should be viewed as a guideline to be refined for specific soil types and alfalfa production systems. On-farm testing is one way in which alfalfa growers can refine fertility programs for specific situations. An on farm test might involve a trial to determine whether alfalfa responds to Non the farm, or whether a higher rate of P or K results in higher yields. When conducting an on farm test, treat several strips in a field with the new fertility practice and alternate strips with the standard practice. Where possible, treat several test strips in a field and only change one variable (such as nutrient type or rate) for each trial. Keep individual records of fertilizer applications, soil and tissue test values, and alfalfa yield for the trial to assess whether the new practice improved yield or changed soil test values. REFERENCES California Plant Health Association. 2002. Western Fertilizer Handbook. Interstate Publishers, inc. Danville, IL. Gardner, E.H., D.B. Hannaway, T.L. Jackson and W.S. McGuire. 2000. Alfalfa - Willamette Valley and Northwest Oregon. Oregon State University Cooperative Extension FG 18. Available online at: http://osu.orst.edu/extension/

Hannaway, D.B. and P.E. Shuler. 1993. Nitrogen fertilization in alfalfa production. J. Prod. Agric. 6:80-85. Koenig, R., B. Kitchen, C. Hurst and J. Barnhill. 1999. Phosphorus and potassium fertilization of irrigated alfalfa in Utah. Pp 57-62 in T.L. Tindall (Ed) Proceedings of the Western Nutrient Management Conference, March 4-5, Salt Lake City, UT. Koenig, R., J. Barnhill, B. Kitchen, M. Winger, and M. Johnson. 2001. Fertilizer management for alfalfa. Utah State University Extension Bulletin AG-FG-01, 4pp. (available online at www.extension.usu.edu under Agriculture Publications ) Koenig, R., J. Barnhill and J. Gale. 2002. Alfalfa responses to potassium on low testing soils. Better Crops With Plant Food Vol. 1:9-11. Potash and Phosphate Institute, Norcross, GA. Morgan, T.H. 1997. U.S. Western region alfalfa hay production record, other areas decline. Morgan s Hay Articles and Commentary. Available online at: http://www.forage.com/hay/articles/1997/ah19971105w01.html Mortvedt, J.J., D.H. Smith and R.L. Croissant. 1996. Fertilizing alfalfa and grass. Colorado State University Cooperative Extension no. 0.537. Available online at: http://www.ext.colostate.edu/ Nielson, R.F., J.P. Thorne and G.T. Baird. 1955. Fertilizer requirements of alfalfa hay in Utah. Utah Agricultural Experiment Station Bulletin # 374. Utah State Agricultural College. Reid, C.R., D.L. Winward and R. T. Koenig. A comparison of liquid phosphoric acid and dry phosphorus fertilizer sources for irrigated alfalfa production on calcareous soils. Comm. Soil Sci. Plant Analy. In press. Westermann, D.T. 1974. Indexes of sulfur deficiency in alfalfa. I. Extractable soil SO 4 -S. Agron. J. 66:578-581. Westermann, D.T. 1975. Indexes of sulfur deficiency in alfalfa. II. Plant analyses. Agron. J. 67:265-268.