Telecommunications Customer Satisfaction

Similar documents
Sensis e-business Report

Sensis e-business Report

amaysim Australia Limited (ASX:AYS) today announced its results for the full year to 30 June 2017.

Customer Service Experience Report Quarter

COMMUNICATIONS ALLIANCE LTD. Paper Billing: Consultation RIS COMMUNICATIONS ALLIANCE SUBMISSION JANUARY 2018

New TCP Code frequently asked questions

National Survey on the Cooperative Difference

A SURVEY UNDERTAKEN BY HI EUROPE SEPTEMBER 2002

Customer satisfaction research. Fieldwork: July - August 2016

QUEENSLAND COMMUNITY LEGAL CENTRE 26JULY Judi Jones Ombudsman

Staff Response Facts and Figures

Energy & Water Ombudsman Queensland.

CUSTOMER SATISFACTION TECHNOLOGY SURVEY

Animal Cloning. American Anti-Vivisection Society. Produced for. Prepared by. December 22, 2006

Evaluation of Directory Enquiries services. Ofcom and ICSTIS research May 2004

Survey Use & Design. SE 350 Software Processes & Product Quality

International Mobile Roaming. Industry Standard. Draft Report

New thinking on benchmarking customer experience. Vicki Howe, Head of Product Development

HOW TO DEFINE THE ROI OF YOUR QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM

How we collect and process Single Source data in Indonesia. Discover your edge

Users Look For Better Value From ERP Support

SME Preferences in Narrowband Communications Research Report

CUSTOMER SATISFACTION INDEX OF SINGAPORE 2018 Q1 RESULTS OVERVIEW RETAIL AND INFO-COMMUNICATIONS

Dealer. Consumer Attitude Survey

Summary and Conclusions

British Gas Report to Ofgem in response to Ofgem s open letter on Supplier Complaints Handling dated 26th September 2014

NexPress Digital Production Color Printing Study

A guide to using the Common Measurements Tool

THE PRS CONSUMER REPORT. A report for PhonepayPlus

2018 Strathcona County Website Survey Results. Report prepared by Phil Kreisel, Ph.D. Communications

Chelan PUD Customer Satisfaction Survey. February March 2018

2014 Survey of Residential Electric Customer Interest in Value-Added Products and Services

1 Yellow Social Media Report 2018 Businesses. Yellow Social Media Report Part Two Businesses.

AUSTRALIANS USE OF AND SATISFACTION WITH E-GOVERNMENT SERVICES

TORONTO TRANSIT COMMISSION REPORT NO.

Credit Card Monitor Q2 2013

Approach & Methodology of the Study Objective & Scope 3. Methodology 3. Secondary Research & Research Tool Development 3. Primary Research 3

CUSTOMERS ATTITUDE TOWARDS MOBILE PHONE NETWORKS SERVICE PROVIDERS IN SALEM DISTRICT

July Final survey before EU vote shows employers remain cautious. Confidence

Business Plan

Review of the Survey of Employer Use and Views of the VET System: approach for the 2013 survey

Inter-firm collaboration in Australian Telecom market

Citizens First 8 KEY INSIGHTS AND FINDINGS. Presented by: Dan Batista, Executive Director December 10, Citizens First 8

PHILLIPS PANTZER DONNELLEY PROPERTY MANAGEMENT PTY LTD RENTAL APPLICATION FORM

EMS and Fire Services Regionalization Study: Telephone Survey Report May 8, 2006

A guarantee for the future

Expectations & Experiences Channels and New Entrants. September 2017

WIND FARM OPINION POLL. Conducted 11th 13th May 2015

VocaLabs SectorPulse: Mobile Phones XV

OPTIMISING CUSTOMER EXPERIENCE IN INDIA & SOUTH EAST ASIA

Australian Online Search and Directories Advertising Market

Optimizing WAN for Application Acceleration

2006/07 Annual Performance Report Electricity Retailers

Evaluation of Apprenticeships: Employers

ISBN no Project no / Public version. A study under section 9A of the Telecommunications Act

Los Alamos County Department 000 of Public Utilities 2017 Customer Survey

Discover your. edge. How we collect and process Single Source data in Indonesia.

Customer Complaints Guidelines: distinguishing customer queries from complaints

CHAPTER 4 ANALYSIS OF PERCEPTION OF THE LANDLINE CUSTOMERS

Connected Consumer Survey 2018: mobile customer satisfaction in Australia and New Zealand

Frequently Asked Questions

Developing Job Quality Benchmarks in Australian Aged Care Services

Water Matters Household customers views on their water and sewerage services 2015

Telecommunications Retail Service Quality Framework

2001 CUSTOMER SATISFACTION RESEARCH TRACKING STUDY

This document sets out my decision on a complaint from the Consumer about the Provider.

Customer Surveys Provide Roadmap for Public Power s Future

CUSTOMER EXPERIENCE JOURNEY

MCA Market Research Consumer Perception Survey Results Bundles. MCA January 2014

Member Survey Complete and return this survey and you could win a $200 energy credit!

A STUDY OF DMO VISITOR GUIDES

EcoPinion. Survey Report Issue 14 February Prepay Energy s Pathway to Consumer Satisfaction and Benefits: Survey Results from Texas and Arizona

Member Survey $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ Complete and return this survey and you could win a $200 energy credit!

Introduction. Table of Contents

About Us. ADMA Telecom TELEVISA - BLACKSTONE.

For personal use only MOBILE EMBRACE ASX: MBE. FY 2016 Results. Chris Thorpe, CEO REACH ENGAGE TRANSACT EMBRACE 1

Ninety-five percent of enterprises say they know why a customer defects, but not until it's too late.

Annual Customer Satisfaction Survey 2015 Detailed results

EMPLOYERS USE & VIEWS OF THE VET SYSTEM

Market Review. Retail Access to the Public Telephone Network at a Fixed Location for Residential and Non Residential Customers

CONSUMERS RIGHTS IN CROATIA

BT Response A review of consumer complaints procedures - Ofcom consultation

CHAPTER - V SUGGESTIONS, RECOMMENDATIONS AND CONCLUSION

2014 FROST & SULLIVAN ASIA PACIFIC M2M SERVICE PROVIDER OF THE YEAR TELSTRA

Call Center Benchmark India

Broadband Customer Satisfaction Survey. Report C11/17

Techniques A practical path to customer loyalty

Electricity Authority

EUROPE ONLINE: AN EXPERIENCE DRIVEN BY ADVERTISING SUMMARY RESULTS

Network Rail 2015 Customer Survey Report

Constant Improvement: The Shaw Industries Customer Loyalty Research Program. Brenda Knowles Vice President of Commercial Marketing Shaw Industries

Measuring Our Performance Action plan

Spotlight. Annual report for leaseholders and freeholders. Happy living for the years ahead. For the year ending 31 March 2018

Racing and Thoroughbred Breeding Industry Recruitment, Skills and Retention Survey Report: April 2017

Learning Objectives 1. Develop a system wide approach to service quality 2. Recognize the difference between satisfied and loyal customers 3. Discuss

Civic Satisfaction & Performance Survey 2018 Telephone and Online Panel

Modern Apprenticeship Employer Survey 2015

The Executive View. Jack. J. Phillips, Ph.D ROI Institute, Inc

Customer Service and Complaints Policy & Procedure

The Pay Paradox: The missing link in sales compensation Strategic sales compensation survey

Transcription:

Telecommunications Customer Satisfaction Results of the Tenth-wave polling undertaken by Roy Morgan Research for Communications Alliance Ltd from April 2015 July 2015

Research Objectives and Methodology Roy Morgan Research is tracking customer satisfaction among Australian telecommunications customers. Quarterly polling monitors: overall customer satisfaction; and customer experience viz. four transactional touch points relating to Telecommunications Consumer Protections (TCP) Code provisions; and fulfils in part the agreed co-regulatory requirement to create trackable performance metrics re customer service and complaint handling.

Touch Points Customer Information satisfaction with information provided at point of sale or post purchase, Billing ease of understanding the Telco bill Spend Management experience with, and awareness of, tools to monitor and manage spend with the Telco Service Provider and how this aligns with Bill Shock experiences, and Complaint Handling satisfaction levels amongst those who have raised a complaint with their Telco Service Provider, particularly in regard to how the process was handled and the outcome of the complaint.

Polled Base Communications Alliance indicated its intention to undertake further surveys on a quarterly basis, to enable trend analysis of performance over time. The surveys will be conducted online amongst a representative sample of Australian telecommunication users aged 18 years or older. The methodology and target population remained unchanged across all waves. In September 2014 (Wave 7), three additional questions about 13 and 1300 numbers were included in the questionnaire. The graphical representation of the data for reporting was modified in Wave 7. In the first six reports, charts showed results of all waves conducted. Since Wave 7, charts show a comparison of the results of the first wave and four most recent waves of the survey. This report summarises the key findings of the Wave 10 survey held in June 2015. All survey participants had some form of contact with at least one telephone or internet service provider in the six months prior to their interview. This contact included activities such as making a purchase, receiving a bill, contacting their provider/s by phone or online (email, chat, website), or making a complaint or a general enquiry.

Access In Wave 10, nearly all respondents (98%) had a mobile phone available for their personal use. Over nine in ten (93%) had an Internet connection for personal use. Access to a landline or VOIP phone was, however, substantially lower with one in five (21%) not having a home phone. The results correspond with previous waves figures. Access to telecommunications differs by age with younger people, particularly those under the age of 30 less likely to have access to landline/voip (58%) when compared to those who are 30-49 (75%) and 50 years old and over (93%). This pattern is observed across all waves of the study.

Access

Access

Access The Internet is now an established channel of communication with 93% of the population having access to the Internet. There is relatively little differentiation by age in regard to Internet access.

Access Mobile access remains stable across all waves of the survey.

Metro/Non-Metro In Wave 10, there was no statistically significant difference in access to the Internet and mobile phone and between those living in metropolitan and non-metropolitan regions. However, a slightly larger proportion of respondents in non-metropolitan regions (82%) reported having access to land line than those in metropolitan areas (77%).

Telecommunications Service Providers The most popular telecommunication service providers amongst customers were Telstra (49%), Optus (26%), Telstra/Big Pond (27%) and Vodafone (16%).

Telecommunications Service Providers In Wave 10, respondents under 30 years old were less likely to use Telstra/BigPond (20%) than respondents aged 50 years and over (35%). Vodafone usage amongst younger respondents reached the level of Wave 1 benchmark (24%). Optus usage dropped to 29% as opposed to 35% in Wave 1.

Telecommunications Service Providers Results for 30-49 years old customers in Wave 10 showed a lower level of Telstra/BigPond usage (23%) than in Wave 1(33%). Telstra usage grew from 39% in Wave 1 to 48% in Wave 10.

Telecommunications Service Providers Results for customers from the older group aged 50 years and over were consistent with the Wave 1 benchmark.

Telecommunications Service Providers When selection of telecommunication service providers was examined by area of residence, in Wave 10, the results revealed that Telstra and Telstra/BigPond were more common in non-metro areas (58% and 36% respectively) than in metro areas (44% and 22% respectively). While Optus and Vodafone prevailed in metro areas were more common in metro areas (respectively 29% and 20%) than in non-metro areas (20% and 8% respectively).

Overall Customer Satisfaction Overall customer satisfaction with the level of service provided by Australian telecommunication providers continues to be high (68%). A third (32%) of customers reported being Very Satisfied and just over a third (36%) are Satisfied. One in seven (14%) respondents were Dissatisfied ( Very Dissatisfied and Dissatisfied ) with the customer service in some way, with only a small group of customers (6%) reported being Very Dissatisfied. The results demonstrate that the satisfaction with service remains stable over the period with minor fluctuations. In Wave 10, the proportion of respondents who were Very Satisfied increased (32%) as compared to Wave 1 (26%).

Overall Customer Satisfaction

Ease of Contacting Provider In Wave 10, over three in five (63%) were Satisfied ( Very Satisfied and Satisfied ) with the ease of contacting their telecommunication provider with over a quarter (28%) indicating that they were Very satisfied. One in five (21%) were Dissatisfied ( Very Dissatisfied and Dissatisfied ) with the ease of their contact while a small number of the customers (6%) were Very Dissatisfied. Satisfaction with ease of contacting has remained at 60% or above for the last four quarters, compared to 56% in the first Wave. Conversely, dissatisfaction was highest in Wave 1 (30%) and has been held below 24% for the last four quarters.

Ease of Contacting Provider

Understanding Bills In Wave 10, the satisfaction with ease of understanding information on the bill continues to be high. Almost three quarters (73%) of customers were satisfied ( Very Satisfied and Satisfied ) with the ease of understanding the information on their telecommunication bill. A third (34%) reported they were Very Satisfied. One in ten customers (12%) were Dissatisfied ( Very Dissatisfied and Dissatisfied ) with the ease of understanding their bill. A small proportion of those customers who were dissatisfied were Very Dissatisfied (4%). The last four quarters show a consistent level of satisfaction ( Very satisfied and Satisfied ) at 69% or above as compared to Wave 1.

Understanding Bills

Complaint Handling In Wave 10, just under a half (47%) of respondents made some form of complaint to their telecommunications provider in the six months prior to their interview. The results demonstrate that the proportion of people who made a complaint remains stable over the period with minor fluctuations.

Complaint Handling There is an increase in satisfaction with complaint handling in Wave 10. Those who had made a complaint in the last six months were more likely to be satisfied (61%) ( Very Satisfied and Satisfied ) with how that complaint had been handled when compared to those who made a complaint in Wave 1 (51%). A third of those making a complaint (24%) reported their dissatisfaction ( Very Dissatisfied and Dissatisfied ) with complaint handling. One in seven (13%) were Very Dissatisfied with the process.

Complaint Handling

Product Satisfaction In Wave 10, a half of customers (51%) said that they had purchased a telecommunication product in the six months prior to the survey.

Product Satisfaction In Wave 10, overall satisfaction with the information on products was high with seven in ten (71%) being Satisfied. The proportion of respondents who were Very Satisfied reached 34% which is higher than in Wave 1 (21%). One in six (17%) were Dissatisfied ( Very Dissatisfied and Dissatisfied ) in some way with the information on telecommunication products purchased which corresponds with the first wave results.

Product Satisfaction

Higher Than Expected Bills In Wave 10, a third of respondents (33%) received a bill from a telecommunication provider in the last six months that was higher than expected.

Higher Than Expected Bills Three in four (76%) were aware that there were tools available to help them monitor their spending with their telecommunication provider. The results are consistent across all waves of the survey with minor fluctuations.

13 and 1300 Numbers In Wave 10, three-quarters (75%) of those respondents who had mobile connection for personal usage said that they were on a mobile plan while a quarter (25%) reported that their calls were pre-paid.

13 and 1300 Numbers Of those respondents who were on mobile plan, a third (34%) were aware that their plan included the cost of calls on 13 and 1300 numbers as a part of monthly usage allowance. However, two in five (39%) respondents did not know if the cost of calls to 13 and 1300 were included in their mobile plan. Results are consistent with previous findings in Waves 7-9.

13 and 1300 Numbers In Wave 10, nearly one in ten (8%) respondents who were aware that the cost of calls on 13 and 1300 were included in their plan as a part of monthly usage allowance had an experience during the past 12 months where they had exceeded their monthly call allowance and incurred significant additional charges as a result of mobile calls to 13 or 1300 numbers. However, nine in ten (88%) of those respondents who reported that the cost of calls on 13 and 1300 were included in their plan said that they did not incur significant additional charges as a result of mobile calls to 13 or 1300 numbers.

13 and 1300 Numbers