INDIRECT vs. DIRECT GASIFICATION

Similar documents
ALLOTHERMAL GASIFICATION for CO-FIRING

The technical choices for the 12 MW Bio-SNG demonstration in the Netherlands

MILENA gasification. Christiaan van der Meijden.

Role of Gasification in a Bio-Based Future

Commercialisation of WtE through gasification technology developed by ECN

Allothermal Gasification for Indirect Co-Firing

The MILENA gasification technology for the production of Bio-Methane

ECN Gasification expertise

OLGA. Flexible tar removal for high efficient production of clean heat & power as well as sustainable fuels & chemicals

Commercialization of the ECN MILENA gasification technology

GASIFICATION: gas cleaning and gas conditioning

Opportunities for BioSNG production with CCS Michiel C. Carbo Ruben Smit Bram van der Drift Daniel Jansen

Syngas from Biomass. Ruben Smit Syngas & SNG Group.

RD&D needs and recommendations for the production of high-efficient biosng

Status of biomass gasification A. van der Drift

JER Prospects for production and use of substitute natural gas (SNG) from biomass

MILENA gasification technology for high efficient SNG production from biomass

2 nd generation biofuels from imported biomass Large scale production of Fischer-Tropsch diesel and/or Synthetic Natural Gas

PRODUCTION OF BIO METHANE FROM WOOD USING THE MILENA GASIFCATION TECHNOLOGY

PYRENA PYRolysis Equipment for New Approaches to produce better bio-oil

i-milena gasification technology for (high ash) low rank coal

Entrained Flow gasification of coal/torrefied woody biomass blends

Entrained Flow gasification of coal/torrefied woody biomass blends

Improved Gasifier availability with bed material and additives

Biomethane in the EDGaR program and at ECN

Advanced gas cleaning. Sander van Paasen

The role of thermochemical conversion in biorefinery concepts not just combustion

LARGE-SCALE PRODUCTION OF FISCHER-TROPSCH DIESEL FROM BIOMASS

Advanced Gasification, Gas Cleaning and Product Gas utilization

Methanation of Milena product gas for the production of bio-sng

Indirect gasification of waste to create a more valuable gas

BIO-SYNGAS GENERATION. A. van der Drift, H. Boerrigter, R. Zwart ECN-biomass, Petten, the Netherlands

Advanced Green Gas Technology

Thermochemical Gasification of Agricultural Residues for Energetic Use

Waste gasification improvements

biosng in EUROPE IEA-Bioenergy conference, Vienna, November

Methanisierung von Biomasse CNG/LNG über thermochemische Verfahren

ECN Research and Development in bioenergy

Synthetic Natural Gas (SNG)

Working group Gasification & Gas Cleaning

Brasil EU Workshop Gasification of bagasse to syngas and advanced liquid fuel production. December 8 th 2015 São Paulo, Brasil Martin van t Hoff

On 14C-based methods for measuring the biogenic carbon fraction in fuels and flue gases Palstra, Sanne Waltje Lieze

Development of the MILENA gasification technology for the production of Bio-SNG Meijden, van der, C.M.

Reducing enzyme cost of cellulosic biofuels production

THE CHALMERS GASIFIER

Pyrolysis of Bamboo Vulgaris for fuels, chemicals and energy

FIRST OPERATING EXPERIENCE ON A 120kW DUAL CIRCULATING FLUIDIZED BED (DCFB) SYSTEM FOR CHEMICAL LOOPING COMBUSTION

GoBiGas Hours of Operation. Anton Larsson IEA FBC and IEA Bioenergy Task 33 joint workshop

Development and optimization of a two-stage gasifier for heat and power production

OLGA Tar removal. 4 MW t commercial demonstration biomass gasification in France. Gasification Technology Conference San Francisco 2007

Testing and Feasibility Study of an Indirectly Heated Fluidized-Bed Coal Gasifier

Production costs for different green gas qualities based on large-scale gasification of. biomass. Author: Bahlmann, R. Co-author(s): Roeterink, H.

Conversion of Biomass Particles

Advanced Gas Cleaning using Chemical-Looping Reforming (CLR)

ABE 482 Environmental Engineering in Biosystems. September 29 Lecture 11

A. Poluzzi a, G. Guandalini a, I. Martínez* b, M. Schimd c, S. Hafner c, R. Spörl c, F. Sessa d, J. Laffely d, M.C. Romano a

Case studies of thermal energy storage in industrial processes

Gasification Research at OSU

Tar removal from biomass product gas; development and optimisation of the OLGA tar removal technology

HIGH EFFICIENCY ELECTRICITY AND PRODUCTS FROM BIOMASS AND WASTE; EXPERIMENTAL RESULTS OF PROOF OF PRINCIPLE OF STAGED GASIFICATION AND FUEL CELLS

Biomass Combustion Technology

Evaluation of integrated biorefinery technologies in power industry

BIO-SYNGAS: KEY INTERMEDIATE FOR LARGE SCALE PRODUCTION OF GREEN FUELS AND CHEMICALS

The potential of Power to Gas technology integrated with biomethane production

Three-dimensional modelling of steam-oxygen gasification in a circulating fluidized bed

ECN s torrefaction-based BO 2 - technology from pilot to demo

Gasification of Biomass. Hannes Kitzler, Vienna University of Technology

Compact Gasification and Synthesis process for Transport Fuels

RESEARCH GROUP: Future Energy Technology

LIQUEFACTION OF BIOMASS AND ORGANIC WASTE BY INTERMITTENT FLUID BED PYROLYSIS (IFB PYROLYSIS)

Effect of operating conditions in Chemical-Looping Combustion of coal in a 500 W th unit

Handling and storage of torrefied biomass pellets

Synthetic Natural Gas from Coal, Applications

Synthetic Natural Gas from Coal,

Tar removal from low-temperature gasifiers

oil/residues) is dominated by the ammonia industry. Also the H 2 in oil refineries represent a significant share in present syngas applications.

Discussions and Wrap-Up. Summary and Takeaways from Workshop

Torrefaction a sustainable supply chain game changer

Gasification units Drying and sieving chips systems. An efficient and reliable solution for cogeneration from virgin wood chips

BIOMASS AND WASTE-RELATED SNG PRODUCTION TECHNOLOGIES

CHEMICAL-LOOPING COMBUSTION (CLC) Status of development. Anders Lyngfelt, Chalmers University of Technology, Göteborg

Research Group Zero Emission Technologies

ECN s torrefaction-based BO 2. -technology from pilot to demo. Jaap Kiel. IEA Bioenergy workshop Torrefaction, Graz Austria, 28 January 2011

MODELING OF BIOMASS GASIFICATION Venko Petkov, Emil Mihailov, Nadezhda Kazakova

Biomass Gasifiers Christoph Pfeifer. Biogas from Biomass Gasification for Homes and Transport 20-21st January 2010, Gothenburg

GAS CLEANING FOR INTEGRATED BIOMASS GASIFICATION (BG) AND FISCHER-TROPSCH (FT) SYSTEMS; EXPERIMENTAL DEMONSTRATION OF TWO BG-FT SYSTEMS

ORC BOTTOMING OF A GAS TURBINE: AN INNOVATIVE SOLUTION FOR BIOMASS APPLICATIONS

CHARACTERISTICS OF THE PYROLYSIS AND GASIFICATION OFLOW-DENSITY POLYETHYLENE (LDPE)

MODELLING THE LOW-TAR BIG GASIFICATION CONCEPT

Process simulation activities at Politecnico di Milano on Ca-based solid looping cycles

Modelling & experimental validation of biomass-steam gasification in bubbling fluidized bed reactor

Development of an Innovative 2.5 kw Water- Silica Gel Adsorption Chiller

Heat transfer optimization in a fluidized bed biomass gasification reactor

Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Cagliari Piazza d Armi, Cagliari, Italia

Large scale Fischer-Tropsch diesel production opportunities and challenges to shift from black (coal) to green (biomass)

Improved solutions for solid waste to energy conversion

Update on Biomass Gasification in New Zealand

Does proces engineering apply to the precision industry?

Carbon To X. Processes

SEWAGE SLUDGE GASIFICATION. DOLOMITE PERFORMANCE UNDER DIFFERENT OPERATING CONDITIONS

Transcription:

INDIRECT vs. DIRECT GASIFICATION Bram van der Drift, Guadalupe Aranda, Berend Vreugdenhil, Rian Visser, Carlos Vilela, Christiaan van der Meijden 4 September 2013 www.ecn.nl

GASIFICATION matching energy consumption and production energy production: fuel + air (l > 1) flue gas + heat 25% energy consumption: fuel + heat gas + char/coke + 75% gasification: fuel + air (l~0.3) gas + char/coke 2

SECOND GENERATION also called: indirect gasification energy production: fuel + air (l > 1) flue gas + heat 25% energy consumption: fuel + heat gas + char/coke + 75% gasification: fuel + air (l~0.3) gas + char/coke 3

GASIFICATION generations First generation (=direct) One reactor, one gas N 2 -free gas requires ASU Incomplete carbon conversion High temperature, high steam, small fuel size, large residence time needed for acceptable conversion Second generation (=indirect) Two coupled reactors, two gases N 2 -free gas without ASU Complete carbon conversion Additional degree of freedom: temperature, steam, fuel size, residence time gas gas gas gas flue gas flue gas fuel fuel gasifier gasifier gasifier gasifier combustion combustion energy energy fuel air ash+char fuel air ash+char fuel fuel air ash air ash

IN OTHER WORDS lower temperature, better efficiency, higher conversion direct gasification Gasification Temperature 100-200 C indirect gasification Carbon energy loss Carbon energy source for gasification 0% Fuel Conversion 100%

MILENA TECHNOLOGY indirect gasification technology by ECN Highly efficient Complete conversion Fuel flexible Compact raw producer gas flue gas pyrolysis combustion biomass air steam or CO 2 or www.milenatechnology.com 6

INDIRECT GASIFICATION Energy transport between the two reactors Bed material takes carbon from gasifier to combustor gas Char flows with bed material Tars adsorb on (porous) bed material CO 2 transport through carbonates gas fuel flue gas gasifier Bed material can take oxygen from combustor to gasifier gasifier energy combustion fuel air ash+char fuel oxygen air ash

OXYGEN TRANSPORT description of the tests Bubbling Fluidized Bed Olivine bed material (containing Fe) Clean wood fuel, 0.25 kg/h 880 C, 1 kg bed Two tests: Test 1: only gasification Test 2: intermittent gasification/combustion, 100 minutes cycle

OXYGEN TRANSPORT description of the tests oxidation Test 1 Steam Fuel N2 time reduction oxidation Air 100 minutes Air Test 2 Steam Fuel N2 Steam Fuel N2 time reduction

OXYGEN TRANSPORT gas composition Cycle 1 Cycle 2 Oxidation 1 Oxidation 2 Devolatilization 1 Devolatilization 2 Test 2 10

OXYGEN TRANSPORT tars (by SPA method) Instant effect of O-release Iron becomes better catalyst due to reduction Char accumulation

OXYGEN TRANSPORT oxygen quantity Mass balance O mass flow for 1-minute intervals Relate to fuel mass flow ER Relate to iron phase change 20-25% of iron acts as O-pump

COMPARED TO MILENA Test 2, first few minutes Test 2, after a while MILENA operating conditions are equivalent to the initial point of maximum CO 2 : olivine is kept at high oxygen transport capacity 13

OXYGEN TRANSPORT compared to MILENA

CONCLUSIONS Indirect gasification offers degree of freedom compared to direct gasification, since unconverted carbon is not a loss: temperature Freedom to operate at low temperature means fuel flexibility Bed material in indirect gasification can transport oxygen through chemical looping This may add up to an ER of 0.2-0.3 during first few minutes of reduction This theoretically can supply all the required energy for gasification This also reduces tar: By direct combustion of adsorbed tars on surface where iron reduces (O donor) By increased gas phase reforming because of increased CO 2 and H 2 O concentration MILENA is operated with fast reduction/short residence time: maximum oxygen transport

THANKS FOR THE ATTENTION Bram van der Drift ECN Westerduinweg 3 P.O. Box 1 1755 LE Petten 1755 ZG Petten The Netherlands The Netherlands T +31 224 56 45 15 M +31 610 909 927 vanderdrift@ecn.nl www.ecn.nl publications: www.ecn.nl/publications fuel composition database: www.phyllis.nl tar dew point calculator: www.thersites.nl IEA bioenergy/gasification: www.ieatask33.org Milena indirect gasifier: www.milenatechnology.com OLGA: www.olgatechnology.com / www.renewableenergy.nl SNG: www.biosng.com /www.biocng.com 16