CROSSRAIL INFORMATION PAPER H3 CROSSRAIL ACCESS OPTION

Similar documents
Hybrid Bill process. Version 1.0

CROSSRAIL INFORMATION PAPER D25 NOISE FROM FIXED INSTALLATIONS

Management of Strategic Capacity on the Network

A2: FUTURE TRAIN SERVICE PATTERNS ON THE WEST COAST MAIN LINE CORRIDOR

CROSSRAIL INFORMATION PAPER D26 SURFACE RAILWAY NOISE AND VIBRATION

CROSSRAIL INFORMATION PAPER D24 TUNNELLING DURATION AND CONSTRUCTION STRATEGY

Template Framework Freight Track Access Agreement and HS1 Freight Access Terms: Conclusions Document. Date: June

B6: RAILWAY POWERS IN THE HYBRID BILL

CROSSRAIL INFORMATION PAPER D10 GROUNDBORNE NOISE AND VIBRATION

2. Specific criteria will be applied in order to determine whether or not a discount will be offered;

Planning, Reporting and Regulatory Framework

Crossrail Environmental Statement Volume 1

Strategic Rail Investment Priorities November 2017

MINUTES OF ORAL EVIDENCE. taken before HIGH SPEED RAIL COMMITTEE. On the HIGH SPEED RAIL (LONDON WEST MIDLANDS) BILL

GLASGOW AIRPORT RAIL LINK BILL NETWORK RAIL OBJECTION. 1. Introduction

SECRETARY OF STATE FOR TRANSPORT

The role of competition in passenger rail services: performance and incentives

C11: REGENERATION, COMPULSORY PURCHASE POLICY AND OVER SITE DEVELOPMENT

Asset Management Policy

Consultation on Integrated Transport Block Funding FINAL. March Consultation Response. pteg Support Unit

Chapter 12. Interaction with other major projects

Local Government and Communities Committee. Planning (Scotland) Bill

Margaret Mitchell MSP Convener of the Justice Committee Scottish Parliament By 31 October 2017.

E13: MANAGEMENT OF TRAFFIC DURING CONSTRUCTION

Level Crossing Reform Action Plan

Incident Response Planning & Management

Evaluation of the way in which national safety rules are published and made available Annex 26 Country report for United Kingdom

Draft Code of Construction Practice

CONTRACTUAL AND REGULATORY REFORM WORKSTREAM. RDG vision for the charges and incentives regime in the long run

2. Explanation of law that the proposals amend and summary of the proposals

London Borough of Barnet (Brent Cross Cricklewood)

Response to the Transport Committee s Intercity East Coast rail franchise inquiry

Against the Bill - On Merits - Praying to be heard by Counsel, &c.

HS2 PHASE ONE SAFEGUARDING DIRECTIONS. With guidance notes for local planning authorities

GE/GN8640. Risk Evaluation and Assessment. Guidance on Planning an Application of the Common Safety Method on. Rail Industry Guidance Note

Business plan

DCLG Consultation on Proposed Changes to National Planning Policy Historic England Submission

DEVOLUTION: A MAYOR FOR CAMBRIDGESHIRE & PETERBOROUGH. WHAT DOES IT MEAN?

The two main features of Schedule 8 which are being reviewed as part of PR13 are:

Developer Contributions Consultation response form

COUNCIL APPOINTMENT OF EXTERNAL AUDITOR

Crossrail. Environmental Statement. Volume 9c. Appendices. Westbourne Park Bus Garage Extension. Volume 2 Appendices

This paper outlines the carbon footprint and greenhouse gas assessment for HS2 Phase One.

Transport Select Committee Rail Infrastructure Investment Inquiry

Delay Attribution Board. Guidance No. DAB-17

Capacity Utilisation Policy

Principles of the Railway Industry Supplier Qualification Scheme

Non-Executive Director

B1: THE MAIN PROVISIONS OF THE PLANNING REGIME

Neighbourhood Planning Bill Lords Briefing from the RTPI

Great Western Route Modernisation Industry Systems Integration

BRINGING FORWARD EU EMISSIONS TRADING SYSTEM 2018 COMPLIANCE DEADLINES IN THE UK. Government Response

FRAMEWORK BORDER-CROSSING AGREEMENT

Thursday 23 June 2016 Afternoon

This paper outlines the proposed community relations strategy to be used by the nominated undertaker during construction of Phase One of HS2.

Planning & Heritage Memorandum (Annex 2 to the EMR)

CROSSRAIL INFORMATION PAPER D8 TUNNEL CONSTRUCTON METHODOLOGY

Network Rail s response to ORR s 2018 Periodic Review (PR18) consultation on charges recovering fixed network costs.

Commission on Parliamentary Reform Written views from Scottish Federation of Housing Associations

Role Profile. Franchise Change Manager. Commissioning, Programme and Project

Australian Network Rules and Procedures Development

***I POSITION OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT

DEVOLUTION: A MAYOR FOR THE WEST MIDLANDS. WHAT DOES IT MEAN?

Ultimately, any decisions on Schedule 8 payment rates for CP5 are, of course, for ORR.

DEVOLUTION: A MAYOR FOR TEES VALLEY. WHAT DOES IT MEAN?

West Yorkshire Combined Authority. Consultation Process: April 26 th to May 17 th. Supporting Information. Key Messages. Frequently Asked Questions

ASLEF Response to the Department for Future of Franchising Document April 2010

Deviation from a Railway Group Standard

RAILWAY POLICING (SCOTLAND) BILL

part of the rs on each. A

Thank you for the opportunity to speak to you today. I am Laura Wright, Head of International Policy at the Rail Delivery Group.

HS1 Link The View from London

3 rd Floor 55 Victoria Street London SW1H 0EU Tel: March 2011 REQUEST FOR INFORMATION FOI REQUEST FOI10/144.

SUBJECT: LONDON SOUTHEND AIRPORT & ENVIRONS JOINT AREA ACTION PLAN (JAAP) PRE-SUBMISSION PLAN

CER National Smart Metering Programme Status Update

B. Stakeholder Guide: Infrastructure and utility providers

ORR consultation on on-rail competition: Options for change in open access Network Rail s response

Freight connections contracts

The Infrastructure Decade

The changing face of London and Southeast Railway Architecture. Tony Ramanathan Systems Design Engineer Network Rail

DISCUSSION PAPER ON ACCESS TO SERVICE FACILITIES AND RAIL RELATED SERVICES

Transport (Scotland) Bill Call for Evidence - Rural Economy and Connectivity Committee of the Scottish Parliament

OPERATIONAL PLANNING AND PERFORMANCE: WHO, WHAT & WHY?

DISCUSSION PAPER ON ACCESS TO SERVICE FACILITIES AND RAIL RELATED SERVICES. Article 1. Subject matter

Ely Area Capacity Enhancements

LEGISLATIVE CONSENT MEMORANDUM. Local Democracy, Economic Development and Construction Bill

GRIP for Programmes Release 1 (DRAFT) April Network Rail GRIP for Programmes Page 1 of 104

Procurement framework for managing Commissioning changes

TfN Rail North Committee Meeting Item 7.0

Justice Committee. Proposed integration of the British Transport Police in Scotland into Police Scotland

Building trust and confidence in our reporting Data Assurance Summary 2017/18

Document Control and Version Information

PULSE CANADA. Bill C-49 The Transportation Modernization Act. Sept 5, 2017

GREATER MANCHESTER HEALTH AND SOCIAL CARE STRATEGIC PARTNERSHIP BOARD EXECUTIVE. Establishing Leadership and Accountability in Shadow Form

I KEEP SIX HONEST SERVING-MEN

BARNSLEY METROPOLITAN BOROUGH COUNCIL

Information is available in large print, audio and Braille formats. Text Relay service number 18001

Policy committee

Strategic Direction for revised Infrastructure TSI. Issue 1.0

The Government's Response to The Joint Committee on Human Rights 7th and 12th Reports

Transcription:

CROSSRAIL INFORMATION PAPER CROSSRAIL ACCESS OPTION This paper explains how it is intended that access rights for running Crossrail services are obtained. It will be of particular relevance to those interested in the operational aspects of Crossrail. This is not intended to replace or alter the text of the paper itself and it is important that you read the paper in order to have a full understanding of the subject. If you have any queries about this paper, please contact either your regular Petition Negotiator at CLRL or the Crossrail helpdesk, who will be able to direct your query to the relevant person at CLRL. The helpdesk can be reached at: Crossrail FREEPOST NAT6945 London SW1H 0BR Email: helpdesk@crossrail.co.uk Telephone: 0845 602 3813 APPROVED Version 2 21/01/08

Information Paper CROSSRAIL ACCESS OPTION 1. Introduction 1.1 This paper explains how it is intended that access rights for running Crossrail services are obtained. 1.2 The intention is to seek Access Options for the planned Crossrail services on the existing Network Rail network, in the central tunnel, and on the Heathrow network owned by BAA. This paper concentrates on the Network Rail network as this is a key interest of a number of petitioners. 1.3 The Access Option has been negotiated and agreed with Network Rail and was submitted in July 2007 to the Office of Rail Regulation (ORR) for its consideration. ORR undertook a public consultation and is holding a hearing on 1 February 2008 involving those who responded. The Access Option, application form and associated documents, as well as the consultation responses, are available on the ORR s website: http://www.rail-reg.gov.uk/server/show/conwebdoc.5612 The timing of the decision is a matter for the ORR, but the expectation is that this will be in time to inform the hearing of any railway petitioners by the Lords Select Committee. 1.4 The access rights being sought in the Access Option are for a specified Crossrail service 1 (numbers of trains, peak service, destinations, etc.), which can be accommodated on the Great Eastern and Great Western Main Lines, as enhanced as part of the Crossrail project, having taken careful account of the interests of other users. It is this specific service that is being validated by work undertaken by Network Rail and Cross London Rail Links (CLRL) and scrutinised by the Crossrail Timetabling Reference Group. 2. What is an Access Option? 2.1 Train operators need permission to access the Network Rail network for the purpose of running trains, and the term access rights refers to the rights granted for such access. 2.2 Under the Railways Act 1993 (amended) regime, an Access Option is typically used to provide certainty over future access rights which are contingent on the completion of specified infrastructure enhancements. Approval by the ORR is required before an Access Option becomes effective. Once approved, an Access Option reserves 1 For the context of this paper Crossrail will be a train operating company with characteristics analogous to any other train operating company (TOC) operating franchised passenger services. No assumptions are made about the duration of a franchise or who would let it. APPROVED Version 2 21/01/08-1 -

capacity so that it is not allocated to other applicants and also safeguards the service quality level. 2.3 The Access Option for Crossrail that is currently being considered by the ORR is a statement of the track access and associated rights relating to a future period over Network Rail s infrastructure for Crossrail. The Access Option has been drawn up in negotiation between the Promoter and Network Rail. Formal consultation on the Access Option is a matter for the ORR under its usual processes. 2.4 The Access Option is based on conventional use of Section 17/18 of the Railways Act 1993 (to which the ORR would apply its existing Section 4 duties) and in accordance with the provision on the duration of framework agreements contained in Article 17.5 of Directive 2001/14/EC (and as implemented in Great Britain by regulation 20 of The Railways Infrastructure (Access Management) Regulations 2005). Directive 2007/58/EC has also been borne in mind. 2.5 The Access Option is between Network Rail and the Secretary of State for Transport, though it may be devolved in line with the devolution provisions in the Bill. In due course the Access Option will form the basis of Access Agreements, which will convert the Access Option rights into the rights needed by the Crossrail Train Operating Company (CTOC) to start running the services. The Access Agreement will be at a greater level of detail for Crossrail services over the network. 3. Access Option versus use of Bill Powers 3.1 Whether by means of an Access Option or by use of Bill powers, it is essential that stakeholders committing to Crossrail can be sure that the service levels currently envisaged will be operable by CTOC from the start of full operation to all destinations (which will not be before 2017) for an extended period of time and that other rights have not been / will not be granted in the interim period that would compromise this. An investment of the scale of Crossrail cannot take place without such assurance. 3.2 Approval of an Access Option, providing this is in time for the remaining stages of the Bill in the House of Lords, would enable the Secretary of State for Transport to seek to reduce the railway related powers in the Crossrail Bill. For example, there would be no need to utilise the powers in the Bill to direct Network Rail to enter into access agreements, or to activate duties of the ORR in respect of such access agreements. Further information on this is available in the Supporting Information Paper to the application for the Access Option on the ORR s website: http://www.rail-reg.gov.uk/upload/pdf/s18-xrail-supinf.pdf 3.3 The Promoter s intention is that, should the Access Option be approved, any additional access rights beyond those specified in the Access Option would be subject to approval by the ORR under the usual industry processes, and not under Bill powers. - 2 -

4. Changes to the Access Option 4.1 The Access Option, if approved, would be relied upon to ensure that, through the normal regulatory process, any applications for access rights that conflict with the planned operational Crossrail service are not granted from that date. However, since there may be conflicting access rights already in existence at that date, including perhaps some sought / approved between now and then, it needs to be assumed for the present that reserve powers will need to be retained in the Bill to alter compulsorily (with compensation) those conflicting access rights. 4.2 The exact nature of the Crossrail infrastructure may be altered as a result of scheme development, changes brought about through the Bill process, or decisions by the Secretary of State. Therefore, at this stage of scheme development, the specified infrastructure should be regarded as illustrative and not binding on any party. However, the Access Option contains specific conditions precedent in relation to infrastructure provision. Given that not all design work will have been completed at the time the ORR makes a decision on the Access Option, these conditions provide flexibility for the Secretary of State to vary the infrastructure provision to something of equivalent performance overall. 4.3 The ORR has been developing a general policy to extend to access options a Use It Or Lose It (UIOLI) mechanism for the surrender of unused access rights. The Crossrail Access Option contains a UIOLI mechanism in anticipation of this. The ORR also intends introducing a compulsory buyback mechanism for long duration access options and agreements. Once more detail is available on compulsory buyback proposals, the necessary text will be drafted and added to the Access Option. 5. What the Access Option does not cover 5.1 The Access Option does not (and cannot) include the allocation of capacity rights to non-crossrail services. All such allocation will be subject to the usual industry processes, which will need to include consultation with CLRL as proxy for CTOC. In response to such consultation, CLRL will provide an assessment so that Network Rail and the ORR are aware of the potential impact on rights for Crossrail contained in the Access Option (and, where appropriate, provide a wider picture of the impact on all affected access rights, including those of other operators). 5.2 Additionally, the Access Option does not address services running during the construction period of Crossrail, nor any interim arrangements for operating existing services prior to the phasing in of Crossrail services. Opening is likely to be phased, with operations on some sections of the Crossrail network commencing before others. To ensure a smooth transition it will be desirable for CTOC to take over some existing passenger services before they are replaced by the Crossrail service. These transitional arrangements will have consequences for access rights, which will be identified when more detail is available. - 3 -

5.3 Any change to Crossrail service levels, or to individual services, sought after approval of the Access Option will be subject to normal industry processes regulated by the ORR. 6. Other work supporting the Access Option 6.1 The Timetable Reference Group assists CLRL and Network Rail in undertaking computer modelling and other work to check the feasibility of operating the proposed Crossrail service alongside existing levels regional passenger service and freight services, looking also at future growth. This material, considered by the Timetabling Reference Group, is assisting the ORR in evaluating the application for approval to the Access Option. 7. Rights of Access Option Holders 7.1 The ORR intends to amend the Network Code to provide suitable protection for access option holders. It will be important for Crossrail purposes that holders of access options have equivalent blocking rights to Train Operators with access agreements (as bestowed by parts F and G of the Network Code), in order to prevent any vehicle change or network change that would prevent the CTOC operating the Crossrail services in accordance with the access rights reserved under the Crossrail Access Option. - 4 -