New Tier 1 Boron Guideline for Alberta: Boron Soil Ecotoxicity and Methods Development Research

Similar documents
New Tier 1 Boron Guideline for Alberta: Boron Soil Ecotoxicity and Methods Development Research

New Tier 1 Boron Guideline for Alberta

Assessment of Contaminated Soil in the Canadian Boreal Forest using Standardized Toxicity tests. Mary Moody, SRC Rick Scroggins, Environment Canada

DRAFT Tier 2 Framework for Adjusting Eco-Contact Soil Criteria. ESAA Remediation Technologies Symposium October, 2007 Presented by: Craig Harris

Fate and Transport of Sodium Chloride, Calcium Sulfate (Gypsum), Sodium Sulfate, and Boron in Soil: Implications for Guideline Development Work

Status of Aquatic and Terrestrial Plant Methods in Canada. Contact:

4/17/2014. Using Compost to Improve Post-fire Water Quality. David Crohn University of California, Riverside. Acknowledgements

Proper Data Evaluation for Highly Organic Soils Anthony Neumann, Darlene Lintott

Remediation and Closure of a Former Oilfield Land Treatment Facility using Alberta Environment Draft Tier 2 Eco-Contact Guidelines

Soil Test Laboratory Analysis and Fertilizer Recommendations

Evaluation of Alternative Approaches for Managing Risks of Salt Releases at Wetland Sites

Comparison of Various Extraction Methods for Petroleum Hydrocarbons (PHC) in Soils and in Drilling Waste

BIC Scale for Delineating Petroleum Hydrocarbons in Organic Soils and Compost. Land Conservation and Reclamation Policy

New supplementary guidance for ecological risk assessments at contaminated sites under the Federal Contaminated Sites Action Plan

Annual Status of Reforestation in Alberta Report 2016

Irrigation Management of Perennial Forages

Can Sugar Beet Juice Effluent Be Used as a Biofertilizer?

Canadian Soil Quality Guidelines for the Protection of Environmental and Human Health

33. Fate of pesticides in soil and plant.

Regulatory and Assessment Challenges for Muskeg Soil at Oil and Gas Sites in Northeast BC

Influence of Ironite and Phosphorus on Yield of Oats and Content of Lead and Arsenic at Different Stages of Growth

Growing Trees. Toso Bozic Bioenergy/Agroforestry Specialist Alberta Agriculture and Rural Development

Phytoremediation in Western Canada

Bioavailability, ecological risk assessment and policy implications

Overview of Designing Biochars to Improve Soil Health Characteristics at Two Superfund Sites

RemTech Remediation Technologies Symposium

Remote Northern and Dryland Phytoremediation of Contaminated Soil

Amending soils for improved hydraulic and edaphic properties. Todd A. Houser, MS, CPSS, CPESC DiGeronimo Aggregates LLC

Augmented Bioremediation of PHC Fractions F2 and F3. Evaluation of Bioremediation of Condensate-Impacted Peat and Mineral Soil

Soil Biodiversity and Chemistry Challenges to Reclamation in the Oil Sands

Phytoremediation of petroleum and salt impacted soils: Successfully meeting generic Tier 1 standards and making green technologies work

CHAPTER # 4. Fate of Pollutants in the Environment

Soil testing to benchmark DGT phosphorus testing and other soil health parameters on calcareous soils on Western Eyre Peninsula. Project Report.

Comparison of municipal and tannery sludge effect on soil Cr mobility and barley bio accumulation

Soil Testing and Nutrient Management. Craig Cogger Soil Scientist WSU Puyallup

Extraction of Biorecalcitrant Petroleum Hydrocarbons from Contaminated Soil Using Supercritical Fluid Extraction (SFE)

Controlled Release Nutrition for Agriculture

Ecological Risk Assessment of Oil Sands Reclamation and Closure Landscapes

GetIPM.com Children fall ill after pesticides sprayed -- 2,4-D applied to lawns near family's home Over-the-Counter Herbicides Pose a Significant Thre

Remediation of Brine Spills- What Goes Wrong Kerry Sublette

ORGANIC VEGETABLE NUTRIENT MANAGEMENT

ALBERTA TIER 1 SOIL AND GROUNDWATER REMEDIATION GUIDELINES

Federal Contaminated Sites Action Plan (FCSAP)

Five-year review of the Canada-Wide Standards for Petroleum Hydrocarbons (PHC CWS): Ecological, Direct Soil Contact Guidance

GROUNDWATER INFORMATION SHEET. Boron (B)

Technical Session on Arsenic in the Environment: Sources, Guidelines, Risks and Treatment Lynn Pilgrim, P.Geo March, 2010

East TX Test Site (1/2 Treated)

Sustainable Forest Management

Estimating Irrigation Water Requirements to Optimize Crop Growth

Improving soil physical and chemical properties for better tree performance

Refers to the series of changes that every community undergoes over long periods of time

Impact of ozone pollution on agricultural production

Nutrient Management. The width of the buffer strip depends on slope, soil, runoff volume, sediment load and type of vegetation.

Wellsite Salt Remediation: Subsoil Salinity Tool vs. Site- Specific Salt Risk Assessment? Erik J. Martin, Ph.D., DABT

ALBERTA TIER 2 SOIL AND GROUNDWATER REMEDIATION GUIDELINES

Appendix F. Report: Development of Clean-Up Criteria for Petroleum Hydrocarbons for Silver Bear, Contact Lake and El Bonanza Sites

Science 14: Chapter # 14 Ecosystems and Biomes. Baier's Science 14 1

FACTORS AFFECTING CROP NEEDS FOR POTASSIUM WESTERN PERSPECTIVE TERRY A. TINDALL AND DALE WESTERMANN MANAGER OF AGRONOMY J.R

SPE Test Base Fluids. The test fluids were:

Can Analytical Methods Predict Bioavailability? Chris Swyngedouw Oct. 21, 2005 Remtech 2005

WARNING. COPPER GRANULES (Copper Oxysulfate)

The comparison between powder and granular lime to elevate low soil ph

Urban Soil Conservation and Management

On-site Systems and Groundwater Washington State Department of Health February 6, 2014

Ch. 5 - Nutrient Cycles and Soils

The Importance of Riparian Forests

Hana Santruckova Introduction in the topic of the IP Soil & Water :

M.J. Kaurmann 2001

Routes to Successful Phytoremediation of PHC Impacted Soil: Site Selection and Case Studies

Aquatic Science Unit 2. Water Quality and Water Pollution

Wastewater Treatment in Soils

ISO Soil quality Effects of pollutants on earthworms Part 2: Determination of effects on reproduction of Eisenia fetida/eisenia andrei

SOIL GUIDELINES FOR STORMWATER TREATMENT MEASURES

Myriophyllum sp. Test Methodology for a Rooted Aquatic Macrophyte. AMRAP workgroup

FOCUS Groundwater - Introduction (Part I)

Site Specific Remediation Objectives for Soil Vapour in Alberta (Draft) Norman Sawatsky

Good Irrigation Water Management Practices. December 7, 2016

7-4 Soil. By Cyndee Crawford September 2014

For Agronomic Crops. Fertilizer Recommendations. In Minnesota. George Rehm and Michael Schmitt . AG-MI MN 2500 AGMI (U.

Tier 1 Remedial Criteria Development. Alberta

M. Jillian Mitton, P. Eng Golder Associates Ltd., Calgary, Alberta Darrell Jones, P. Eng - NOVA Chemicals Corporation, Joffre, Alberta ABSTRACT

atertech Banff, AB. April 29-May 1, 2009

Soil and fertilizer management in vegetable production

Alberta Tier 1 Soil and Groundwater Remediation Guidelines

ENHANCED HYDROCARBON BIOREMEDIATION THROUGH THE ADDITION OF HUMIC SUBSTANCES PART II:

Co-composting Treatment of Hydrocarbon Impaired Drilling Wastes. Frank J. Scheibli, M.Sc., P.Geol. Newpark Environmental Services

Trees and Forests. Why Trees? T-1 What Makes a Tree a Tree?

ECOLOGICAL SOIL SCREENING LEVELS FOR PLANTS EXPOSED TO TNT: SUPPORTING RANGE SUSTAINABILITY FOR TRAINING AND TESTING

Sulphur Fertilizer Application in Crop Production

CHAPTER 12 AGRICULTURE, HORTICULTURE, AND FORESTRY

Conservation Biology and Global Change

NUTRIENT MANAGEMENT. Figure 1. The availability of P is affected by soil ph.

1991 USGS begins National Water Quality Assessment Program

Biochar Soil Amendment Opportunities

Phloem Mobile FACTORS EFFECTING HERBICIDE EFFICACY. Xylem Mobile. Illustrations: xylem and phloem. Stem Characteristics. Direction of Flow 4/18/2013

Rainwater harvesting and greywater recovery - Part 1 -

??? Francine Kelly-Hooper, PhD, Soils Scientist CH2M HILL Canada RemTech Conference, Banff Alberta

Phytoremediation on Native Prairie

Developing Protocols for the Ecological Restoration of a Mine Site in the Hudson Bay Lowland, Canada

Biofertilizers for Organic Production

Transcription:

New Tier 1 Boron Guideline for Alberta: Boron Soil Ecotoxicity and Methods Development Research Darlene Lintott, (Exova) Greg Huber, (Equilibrium) Exova Environmental Seminar Jan 15 2016 Equilibrium Environmental Inc.

Summary Introduction Agricultural and Boreal Ecotoxicity Tests Boron Soil Analysis Chemistry vs Toxicity Recommendations Tier 1 Guideline Development 2

Boron in the Environment Naturally present in the environment due to weathering of boroncontaining minerals and decay of plant material Highly soluble in solution; adsorbed in soil by clay (aluminosilicates) and organic matter Background soils generally below current Tier 1 guideline, but in some cases background soils can be above Tier 1 (primarily clayey or organic soils) Essential plant micronutrient Difference between plant deficiency and toxicity is small Species-specific, even variant-specific Concentrations which may be toxic to one species may be deficient for another 3

Anthropogenic Sources Fertilizers and herbicides Industrial Use/Manufacturing glass, fiberglass insulation Wood Preservative Application of fly ash or sewage as soil amendment Wastewater irrigation Land disposal of industrial wastes Use of borax detergent for cleaning tanks, wellheads, equipment Saline produced water and drilling waste Common co-contaminant with elevated salinity in Alberta 4

Why New Research? Current Tier 1 boron guideline of 2 mg/kg hot-water soluble (HWS) boron has several problems: Not based on a modern, risk-based approach Based on professional judgement and limited data in 1991 HWS test designed to diagnose deficiency, not toxicity Older research often used colorimetric detection methods Background concentrations may exceed guidelines Good growth often observed above Tier 1 guideline Texture (clay and organic matter) influence boron sorption/toxicity Plant available/toxic concentrations not correlated well with HWS B measured across different soil types 5

Objectives Narrow range between deficiency and toxicity demands an analytical method capable of measuring plant available B to predict ecotoxicity, regardless of soil characteristics Conduct plant and invertebrate toxicity tests in a variety of boron spiked soils using agricultural and boreal test species Investigate the saturated paste extraction method for measuring plant available soil boron Compare SatPaste B and HWS B toxicity test dose-responses Compile Species Sensitivity Distributions to derive new soil criteria for agricultural and boreal regions in Alberta 6

Reference soil collection Reference soils required for tox tests (boron spiking) Artificial soil as a benchmark Agricultural Region: Fine and Coarse soils Boreal Region: Organic and Mineral Soil Collection Equilibrium: locate and collect four field reference soils using soil maps and field visits. Fine reference soil (clay loam) collected from updated site near Delacour (CCME Tier 1 PHC reference soil) Coarse reference soil had not yet been sourced in Alberta. Suitable sandy loam reference soil collected near Vulcan. 7

Reference Soil Collection - Agricultural Fine reference soil near Delacour (clay loam) Coarse reference soil near Vulcan (sandy loam) 8

Reference Soil Collection - Boreal organic peat soils and mineral brunisol from location near Whitney Lake Provincial Park 9

Soil Properties Fine Coarse Organic Mineral Artificial Texture Clay Loam Sandy Loam Sand 75 um % 32 60 49 96 77 Sandy Loam Texture Fine Coarse Fine Coarse Coarse % Sand 33 62 95 68 % Silt 35 20 2 14 % Clay 32 18 4 18 % OM 3.9 3.0 68 5.3 10 Saturation % 79 51 552 31 100 ph 7.4 5.8 5.5 4.4 6.8 10

Test Soils Preparation 800 L each of three test soils Field Soils air dried to < 10% Moisture, sieved < 2 mm Spike with boric acid solution to achieve a target range of total boron concentrations ranging from non-toxic to toxic effects based on range-finding screening tests. nominal total boron concentrations from 2 to 1000 mg/kg dwb (HWS B 0 > 400 mg/kg) Sufficient test concentrations at low end near criteria of 2 mg/kg HWS B to achieve good resolution. Bring moisture content to optimal moisture content, 80% WHC Age spiked soils 2 weeks 11

Ecotoxicity Tests Plant toxicity tests in soils spiked with a broad range of boron concentrations Six agricultural species in fine, coarse and artificial soil (18 tests) Five boreal species in organic, mineral and artificial soil (11 tests) Environment Canada Biological Test Methods: Test for Measuring Emergence and Growth of Terrestrial Plants Exposed to Contaminants in Soil. EPS 1/RM/45 2005. Test for Growth in Contaminated Soil Using Terrestrial Plants Native to the Boreal Region. EPS 1/RM/56 One long-term growth study with cucumber to flowering stage (3 months) Earthworm survival and reproduction test (60 days) in coarse soil (EPS/1/RM/43) Results from boron toxicity dose-response curves used to generate direct eco-contact guideline based on CCME rank percentile methodology. 12

Test Design 13 treatments including a control; Ten replicates per treatment 1 L test vessels Five to ten seeds per pot 2 to 3 week (ag) and 4 to 6 weeks (boreal) Controlled environmental conditions 13

Toxicity Endpoints Emergence Shoot and Root Length Shoot and Root Biomass Analytical at Test initiation and Termination in triplicate per treatment ph, EC Moisture, Salinity, Nutrients Total Boron (SAD) HWS B SatPaste B as mg/kg dwb and mg/l Tissue Boron IC 25 and IC 50 14

Agricultural Plant Species Species Classification Type Test Duration Life Cycle Alfalfa Dicot Agricultural 21 d Perennial Barley Monocot Agricultural 14 d Annual Durum Wheat Monocot Agricultural 14 d Annual Cucumber Dicot Marketgarden Carrot Dicot Marketgarden Northern Wheatgrass 14 d Annual 21 d Biennial Monocot Grasslands 21 d Annual/perennial 15

Boreal Plant Species Species Classification Type Test Duration Jack Pine Gymnosperm Tree, coniferous White Spruce Gymnosperm Tree, coniferous Black Spruce Gymnosperm Tree, coniferous Bluejoint Reedgrass Trembling Aspen Angiosperm, monocot Angiosperm, dicot Herb, graminoid Tree, deciduous Life Cycle 35 d Perennial 42 d Perennial 42 d Perennial 28 d Perennial 28 d Perennial 16

Boron Analysis Toxicity data compared to measured boron by Hot Water Soluble (HWS) and Saturated Paste (SP) soil extraction methods to determine best analytical method to predict toxicity. Total Boron Strong acid digest acid, heat, oxidizer; ICP; mg/kg dwb Most Tier 1 metals Total pool of soil boron, most largely unavailable Soil Ingestion Pathways Hot Water Soluble Boron 2:1 water:soil with boiling; ICP (historically colorimetric); mg/kg dwb Intended to measure total plant-available boron to diagnose deficiency Soil solution boron + substantial amount from adsorbed soil pools 17

Boron Analysis Saturated Paste Boron Less aggressive extraction than HWS B Same methodology as saturated paste extractions for salinity Incremental water addition to a semi-fluid, saturated paste at ambient temperature. Boron measured in the extract (ICP) as mg/l May be converted to mg/kg dwb based on saturation % Satn % = amount of water added to 100 g dry soil correlated to soil texture mg/l basis advantageous correlated to soil solution concentration Represents dissolved boron in soil solution, minimal adsorbed boron 18

Boron Soil Pools and Extraction Method SAD B HWS B SP B SAD B HWS B Soil Solution B Organic Matter B SAD B HWS B Clay Sorption B Fixed Mineral B SAD B 19

Results: Boron Soil Concentrations - Spiked B vs HWS B HWS boron (mg/kg) 300 250 200 150 100 y = 0.9201x - 0.6354 R² = 0.9913 y = 0.8562x - 8.2553 R² = 0.9726 Organic Soil Artificial Soil Mineral Soil 50 0 y = 0.7974x - 0.7206 R² = 0.9138 0 100 200 300 400 500 Spiked boron (mg/kg) 20

Spiked vs Satpaste B (mg/l) Agricultural Soils 21

Spiked vs Satpaste B (mg/l) Boreal Soils Sat paste boron (mg/l) 300 250 200 150 100 50 y = 0.0027x 2 + 1.9561x - 2.3287 R² = 0.8548 Organic Soil Artificial Soil Mineral Soil y = 0.0007x 2 + 0.4574x - 1.7971 R² = 0.9932 y = 5E-05x 2 + 0.0792x - 0.3841 R² = 0.9584 0 0 100 200 300 400 Spiked boron (mg/kg) 22

Satpaste B mg/l vs HWS B - Boreal Soils 1200 1000 HWS B (mg/kg) 800 600 400 Organic Soil Artificial Soil Mineral Soil 200 0 0 50 100 150 200 250 Sat paste B (mg/l) 23

Ecotoxicity Test Results Cucumber Example relatively sensitive species 24

Cucumber in Clay Loam Cucumber in FB 120 80 100 70 Shoot Length % Control 80 60 60 50 40 B Root Length Shoot Biomass Root Biomass 40 30 SatPaste B mg/l 20 17 9.3 20 10 HWS B mg/kg 0 Trt # 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Trt # 0.8 3.6 2.9 4.1 5.9 11 17 28 45 74 HWS B mg/kg 0.08 1.0 0.9 1.4 2.3 4.9 9.3 16 28 51 Satpaste B mg/l 25

Barley in Clay Loam 26

Barley in Clay Loam - Summary 120 Barley in Clay Loam 400 100 350 Shoot Length 300 Root Length % Control 80 60 B 250 200 Shoot Biomass Root Biomass 40 150 HWS B mg/kg 100 20 0 25 15 50 0 SatPaste B mg/l Trt # 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 0.4 1.5 2.3 3.4 5.0 9 15 25 38 64 102 180 357 HWS B mg/kg 0.2 0.5 0.8 1.4 2.3 4.6 8.2 15 28 49 81 167 326 Satpaste B mg/l 27

Species Sensitivity Comparison in Clay Loam Root Biomass in Clay Loam % Contr 140 120 100 80 60 40 20 0 0 1 10 100 Satpaste B mg/l Alfalfa Northern Wheatgrass Barley Durum Wheat Carrot Cucumber 28

Example Dose Response Cucumber Root Length 120 Cucumber Root Length 100 % Control % Control 80 60 40 20 120 100 Artificial Soil Sandy Loam Clay Loam 0 0.1 1.0 10.0 100.0 1000.0 80 60 40 20 Artificial Soil Sandy Loam HWS boron (mg/kg) Cucumber Root Length Toxicity responses for different soil types are more consistent on a saturated paste B basis (mg/l) Clay Loam 0 0.01 0.10 1.00 10.00 100.00 1000.00 saturated paste boron (mg/l) 29

Boreal Species Toxicity Tests Similar dose response patterns and IC 25 concentrations for satpaste B mg/l IC 25 range from 1.42 mg/l jack pine root biomass in organic soil to 67.6 mg/l for white spruce shoot length in organic soil Stimulation effects at low concentrations Higher variability in boreal species (smaller plants, delicate roots, longer tests) 30

Bluejoint Reedgrass in Organic Soil Bluejoint Reedgrass in Organic Soil 160 1000 140 900 % Control 120 100 80 60 B 800 700 600 500 400 Shoot Length Root Length Shoot Biomass Root Biomass HWS B mg/kg 40 300 200 SatPaste B mg/l 20 100 0 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Trt # 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 9.9 19 28 41 56 76 108 141 213 282 413 547 859 HWS B mg/kg 0.2 0.5 0.8 1.4 2.3 4.6 8.2 15 28 32 50 65 108 Satpaste B mg/l 31

Agricultural Plant SSDs HWS B (mg/kg) 100 IC 25's in various soil types HWS B (mg/kg) % Rank 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 Clay Loam Sandy Loam Artificial soil 25 th percentile: 8.9-32 mg/kg HWS 1 10 100 HWS B (mg/kg) 32

Agricultural Plant SSDs Satpaste B (mg/l) 100 IC 25's in various soil types sat paste B (mg/l) 90 Clay loam 80 Sandy Loam Artificial soil 70 % Rank 60 50 40 30 20 10 25 th percentile: 11.2-16.1 mg/l sat paste Toxicity responses for different soil types are more consistent on a saturated paste B basis (mg/l) 0 1 10 100 saturated paste boron (mg/l) 33

Vegetation boron Soil texture also influences plant boron uptake For a given HWS, most boron taken up by plants in sandy loam, least taken up in artificial soil Differences in soil type reduced when using saturated paste boron (mg/l) Lower BCFs (bioconcentration factors) in roots than shoots Veg Boron (mg/kg) Veg Boron (mg/kg) 250 200 150 100 50 0 250 200 150 100 Veg boron vs HWS boron Barley (sandy loam) Barley (clay loam) Barley (artificial) 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 HWS (initial) (mg/kg) Veg Boron vs Saturated Paste Boron Barley (sandy loam) Barley (clay loam) Barley (artificial) 50 0 0.0 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 Sat Paste Boron (mg/l) 34

Cucumber Long-Term Growth Test 3 month test in clay loam Non-Standardized methodology Good growth and flowering in all treatments except high doses Shoot biomass IC 25 = 4.53 mg/l SP B Shoot length IC 25 = 3.79 mg/l SP B Similar range of toxicity results to short-term test 35

Earthworm Survival and Reproduction Earthworms exposed to boron in coarse sandy loam (13 treatments, 12 reps) 63 days exposure, measure adult survival, number of juveniles per adult and juvenile mass (growth). Juvenile # IC 25 = 5.4 mg/l satpaste B Juvenile mass IC 25 = 26.4 mg/l satpaste B High natural variability in reproductive endpoints; responsive to soil texture. 36

Summary HWS B not a good predictor of plant toxicity over different soil types HWS B measures primarily sorbed boron, with boron sorbed on clay and organic matter not directly toxic to plants Saturated paste B (mg/l) better correlated to soil solution B, plant toxicity response, and boron tissue uptake, regardless of soil characteristics Boreal species similar sensitivity to agricultural species; - cucumber, carrot, jack pine: sensitive - barley, alfalfa, white spruce: least sensitive Good growth often observed well above the current Tier 1 guideline of 2 mg/kg HWS boron, often into 4-10 mg/kg range or higher Growth stimulation for some species (2 to 4 mg/l SP B) IC 25 s Agricultural: 3.2 53.0 mg/l; boreal: 1.6 29.4 mg/l Plant toxicity data was combined with literature data and invert data to create overall eco-contact guideline from SSD IC 25 s. 37

Summary of Proposed Tier 1 Boron Guidelines Direct Eco-Contact Guideline Agricultural, Natural, Residential/Parkland = 3.3 mg/l SP B Commercial/Industrial = 8.2 mg/l SP B Irrigation Water Guideline = 3.4 mg/l SP B Aquatic Life Guideline = 5.0 mg/l SP B Livestock / Wildlife water Guideline = 16.8 mg/l SP B DUA Guideline = 66 mg/l SP B (Fine) / 118 mg/l SP B (Coarse) Human direct soil contact = 7500 mg/l SP B (Ag, Res/Parkland) = 234,000 mg/l SPB Off-Site Migration (eco-contact) = 45.9 mg/l SP B Off-site Migration (human contact) = 107,000 mg/l SP B 38

Acknowledgements Petroleum Technology Alliance of Canada (PTAC) Greg Huber and team, Equilibrium Environment Canada PTAC Boron Working Group AEP 39

Alfalfa Durum Wheat Jack Pine Carrot Northern Wheatgrass Darlene.Lintott@exova.com 40