Energy Optimized Resource Recovery Project Presented By: Curtis Czarnecki, P.E.

Similar documents
Kenosha Wastewater Treatment Plant - Energy Optimized Resource Recovery Project

IMPACTS OF THERMOCHEMICAL HYDROLYSIS ON VISCOSITY, BIOGAS & DEWATERABILITY

Why THP Made Sense for TRA

Codigestion Case Studies Enhancing Energy Recovery From Sludge

Total Makeover for Biosolids Handling at DC Water s Blue Plains Advanced Wastewater Treatment Plant. February 2015

Chapter 2: Description of Treatment Facilities

Comprehensive Biosolids and Bioenergy Planning Authors: Cameron Clark* 1, Irina Lukicheva 1, Anna James 1, Kathy Rosinski 1, Dave Parry 1

Application of the AGF (Anoxic Gas Flotation) Process

Sheboygan Regional WWTF s Waste to Energy. The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly

SHAFDAN (Greater Tel Aviv Wastewater Treatment Plant) - Recent Upgrade and Expansion

Harrisburg Advanced Wastewater Treatment Facility Biosolids Facilities Improvement Plan Existing Conditions Report. February 2017

THERMAL HYDROLYSIS: DESIGN, COMMISSIONING AND LESSONS LEARNED THROUGH A HISTORY OF INSTALLATIONS GREG KNIGHT

APPENDIX A. 1. Background. 1.1 Existing Facilities. Page 1

Role of Entrant s Firm. »» Final Design»» Completion of Funding. »» Engineering Services During Applications. »» Plant Startup and Filtration

WEF Residuals and Biosolids Conference Piloting to Establish Performance Criteria at Miami s South District WWTP

City of Elk River Wastewater Treatment Facility Improvements. Achieving Wastewater Treatment Goals

June 19, 2013 Annual OWEA Conference Steven Reese, P.E.

Thermal Hydrolysis Comes to Texas!

Anaerobic Digester Optimization with Bio-Organic Catalyst. NYWEA 81 st Annual Meeting February 3, 2009 One Year Study November 07 - November 08

Center Sanitation District

DELHI CHARTER TOWNSHIP

Anaerobic Digester Optimization with Bio-Organic Catalyst

Sustainable Energy Management

Utilizing Anaerobic Digester Capacity to Process Source Separated Organics: Two Case Studies

Honouliuli WWTP Start Up and Operation of the New Anaerobic Digesters

Generating Energy Through Co-Digestion

Anaerobic Digestion The New Frontier Ohio WEA Biosolids Specialty Workshop 11 December 2014 J. Hunter Long

WWTP Side Stream Treatment of Nutrients Considerations for City of Raleigh s Bioenergy Recovery Project. Erika L. Bailey, PE, City of Raleigh

BIOLOGICAL WASTEWATER BASICS

Technical Description Package Micro Auto Gasification System (MAGS )

Anaerobic Digestion and High Strength Waste Co-Digestion Panel Discussion

EVALUATION OF ENERGY RECOVERY OPTIONS FOR CONVERSION OF AEROBIC DIGESTERS TO ANAEROBIC DIGESTION

Sludge Workshop 3rd April 2017 Zagreb. Isabelle LEBLANC -

4 Angles. Pilot-scale Evaluation of AirPrex for Phosphorus Management. Innovation Program Phosphorus Initiative JTAC 4/22/2017

Is It Really Cost-Effective to Use My Digester Gas? (Should I Be Co-Digesting?)

Operating Experience with Ostara Struvite Harvesting Process

Your Problem. Current Practices. Survey about Storage. Thinking about Cost. Mixed waste {Your truck} Your Resources Options Future

WEAO STUDENT DESIGN COMPETITION 2019 PROJECT STATEMENT

January 25, Utility of the Future One City s Journey

HOW TO SAVE COSTS AND IMPROVE SUSTAINABILITY WHILE REDUCING EFFLUENT NITROGEN

CHAPTER 1 - WASTEWATER SYSTEM DESCRIPTION

Chapter 5: Treatment Assessment Future Condition

Dewatering Optimization Near-Term Savings and Long-Term Capital Planning

SLUDGE TREATMENT AND DISPOSAL

Taking the Waste out of WAS: Sludge Pretreatment for Beneficial Uses

ES.1 Solids Master Planning Background and Goals

Report on Piloting of the Volute Dewatering Press at the Boonsboro WWTP in Boonsboro, MD July 25 th - July 29 th, 2016

FAIRMONT WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT

List of Tables... iii. List of Figures... iii. List of Appendices... iii. Executive Summary... ES. Section 1: Background

EVALUATING ALTERNATIVES FOR DISPOSING OF WATER PLANT SOLIDS INTO A WASTEWATER PLANT

4/23/2012. Program development to Preliminary Design level by the Biosolids Program Manager. Thermal hydrolysis/digestion challenges and innovations

Reduce Grid Required Energy to Utilize Your Wastewater Treatment Facility

<1ppm Phosphorus A BNR With No Chemical Addition Case Study

Anaerobic Digestion Fundamentals

The TRA CRWS Master Plan. Past, Present, & Future of CRWS. Kaylee Dusek, EIT, Garver Matt Jalbert, PE, TRA

Case History: Anaerobic and Aerobic Treatment of Textile Wastes at South Carolina Textile Plants. Introduction

CHAPTER 4 DESCRIPTION OF EXISTING FACILITIES

COMMISSION MEETING. April 18, Engineering and Construction Team. Piscataway WWTP Bio-Energy Commissioners Status Briefing

VILLAGE OF ALGONQUIN 2014 WASTEWATER FACILITY PLAN UPDATE EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Evaluation of Energy Recovery Options for Conversion of Aerobic Digesters to Anaerobic Digestion

Polishing Ponds. Biosolids Storage. Ammonia Removal. Digesters. Thickeners. Pretreatment. Final Clarifiers. Primary Clarifiers.

Performance Evaluation of the Moores Creek Advanced Water Resource Recovery Facility

Advanced Aerobic Digestion. ThermAer. Autothermal Thermophilic Aerobic Digestion. Biosolids Treatment. Thermal Process Systems ThermAer Process

Excellence in Engineering Since 1946

Duffin Creek Water Pollution Control Plant Technical Information

Sulaibiya world s largest membrane water reuse project

Solids Dewatering Modernization

Sustainable Biosolids Management: Direct Energy Use Does Not Tell All

PERMIT TO OPERATE SILVER CLOUD CT., MONTEREY, CA TELEPHONE (831) FAX (831)

Solids Management for Today s Wastewater Systems

INTERESTINGLY ATAD: OPERATIONAL DATA FROM THE NEW ATADS IN ONTARIO

BIOSOLIDS Pasteurization: A NEW APPROACH IN CHERAW, S.C.

To Digest or Incinerate Sludge That is the Question

Anaerobic Processing Principles & Technologies. Endeco

Lowering The Total Cost Of Operation

Thermal Hydrolysis The Next Generation

62 Grove St., West Deptford, New Jersey

From Private to Public Dayton s Journey into the Biosolids Business. Jason Tincu, WWT Administrator June 19, 2013

New high-rate plug flow anaerobic digester technology for small communities

ANAEROBIC TREATMENT OF PAPER MILL WASTEWATER

About the RRC. February

Holistic Approach to Plant Optimization for Biosolids Management

High Value Resources from High Strength Wastes: Leveraging Food Production Byproducts to Reduce BNR Costs

HIGH PERFORMANCE ANAEROBIC DIGESTION

Startup of Virginia's Newest Organics Co-Digestion Facility. Dennis Clough, Energy Systems Group George Bevington, Gerhardt, LLC

Biogas Production from Municipal Solid Waste in Havana, Cuba

Biogas Cogeneration of Heat & PowerEnergy Reduction at the McAlpine Creek Wastewater Management Facility

Sometimes Being Faced With A Challenge Can Lead To Greater Opportunities

Proposal by Russia to delete hot sub-spot Hot sub-spot name South-West Wastewater Treatment Plant

Course: Wastewater Management

INFORMATION TO CONSULTANTS for. (C3) RFP E CBJ Biosolids Belt Dryer System. 155 South Seward Street Juneau, Alaska 99801

Appendix B-1. Design Calculations for Sewage Treatment Plant

FOG RECEIVING, PRETREATMENT AND ANAEROBIC CODIGESTION DERRY TOWNSHIP MUNICIPAL AUTHORITY CLEARWATER WWTP, HERSHEY, PA

A Simple and Energy Efficient Approach to Cleaning Biogas

Product Overview. Eco-efficient solids separation

Wastewater Management: Problem or Opportunity?

Sludge Co-Thickening and Biogas Cogeneration in the Electric City

Transitioning to a Thermal Drying Program at DWSD. March 3, 2015

Brian Carrico, AICP, Senior Project Manager/Environmental Planner

Energy Efficiency in Wastewater Treatment

Transcription:

Kenosha Wastewater Treatment Plant Energy Optimized Resource Recovery Project Presented By: Curtis Czarnecki, P.E. Kenosha Water Utility March 22, 2016

WWTP Service Area Overview Population: 110,000 Service Area: 85.7 mi 2 Collection System Gravity Sewer System: 332 mi. Lift Stations: 13 Effluent Discharge: Lake Michigan Annual Average Daily Flow: 21.9 mgd Permitted Average Annual Daily Flow: 28.6 mgd

WWTP Loadings Current Loadings (Based on 2015 Data): BOD: Avg. Day 32,910 lbs/day; Effluent = 2,475 lbs 92 % Removal TSS: Avg. Day 32,863 lbs/day; Effluent = 1,415 lbs 96% Removal Ammonia: Avg. Day 4,881 lbs/day; Effluent = 530 lbs 89% Removal Phosphorus: Avg. Day 533 lbs/day; Effluent = 85 lbs 84% Removal

Sludge Characteristics Primary Sludge: Average Flow 68,619 gpd Solids Concentration 3.3% Solids Production 19,018 lbs/day Volatile Solids Production 14,267 lbs/day Volatility 77% Waste Activated Sludge (WAS): Average Flow 151,350 gpd Solids Concentration 1.05% Solids Production 13,006 lbs/day Volatile Solids Production 9,377 lbs/day Volatility 72% Digested Sludge: Solids Concentration 2.7% Volatile Solids 54% Sludge to Landfill (2015) 2,495 dry tons

Motivation Behind Project Aging WWTP infrastructure An effort to combat ever rising utility costs: Natural Gas Electricity Reduce or eliminate landfill disposal fees

Project Objectives Increase the generation of methane gas from anaerobic digestion of sludge; Generate electricity from the methane gas to produce greater than 500 kw of continuous power to be interconnected to the existing plant power network; Use the electricity generated to offset peak energy pricing during high demand periods; Use the electric and thermal energies generated to dry the biosolids so as to achieve 90% dry solids; Reduce the volume and cost of biosolids land filled; Produce high quality biosolids that meet the criteria for Class A biosolids allowing for beneficial reuse; Recover and utilize waste heat as the main thermal energy supply for the facility; Maintain existing effluent quality of the plant; Not increase ambient noise level, odor or particulates beyond the waste water treatment plant; Obtain a performance warranty for the system; and Install a system that can provide a payback period of 8 years or less

Design Approach Design/build approach was utilized Wisconsin allows for design/build on resource recovery projects In the RFP the design/builder was tasked with the following: Preparation of the design Assisting the Kenosha Water Utility (KWU) in obtaining all necessary permits Procuring, constructing and installing all components Integrating the new system with the existing plant supervisory control and data acquisition (SCADA) network Startup and commissioning Preparation of operations and maintenance manuals Warrantying the system

KWU and Centrisys Corporation Relationship began in 2009 with the installation of a dewatering centrifuge Intent was to replace our three plate and frame presses for sludge dewatering. This project met or exceeded all design criteria In addition, the reduced operational and labor costs provided a payback of one year! Based on the success of this project as well as the fact Centrisys is headquartered in Kenosha, WI we began a partnership to function as a research and development site for their technology. In 2011 Centrisys installed their first ever thickening centrifuge Intent was to replace our dissolved air floatation thickening (DAFT) system for our waste activated sludge.

Primary Sludge Thickening THK 200 by Centrisys Corporation Previously: The gravity thickened primary sludge was pumped directly from the primary clarifiers into one of the four primary digesters. On average the primary sludge was 3.3% solids being pumped into the anaerobic digesters. After Project: To accomplish our goals of reducing the number of functional digesters and improving the overall heat balance of the plant KWU needed to further thicken the primary sludge stream A thickening centrifuge was installed to further thicken the primary sludge to 7% solids. No polymer or chemical addition is necessary to achieve desired sludge thickness.

Primary Thickening Centrifuge Installation

WAS Thickening Centrifuge THK 200 by Centrisys Corporation Prior to our partnership: A DAFT system was utilized to thicken the WAS flow stream The DAFT system thickened the WAS from 1% to 3.5%- 4.0% solids before being pumped into one of the four primary digesters. A WAS thickening centrifuge was previously pilot tested and installed in 2011 Due to downstream limitations the WAS flow stream was thickened to roughly 5% solids with the thickening centrifuge This project allowed us to further thicken the WAS flow stream to 7% solids Once again, no polymer or chemical addition is necessary to achieve desired sludge thickness The thickened WAS flow is discharged into a thermochemical hydrolysis process for further processing.

WAS Thickening Centrifuge Installation

Thermo-Chemical Hydrolysis PONDUS by CNP-Technology Water and Biosolids Corporation Components of Hydrolysis Process: Thermo TWAS is heated to 65-70 o C (150-160 o F) Chemical Two liters of caustic soda (50% concentration) is injected per 1 m 3 of TWAS Detention Time After the addition of caustic soda and heat, the thickened WAS stream circulates through the reactor for 2 to 2.5 hours.

Thermo-Chemical Hydrolysis

Thermo-Chemical Hydrolysis ph: Upon addition of caustic soda ph = 11 Following hydrolysis process ph = 6.8 to 7.0 Hydrolysis process breaks down the cell walls and releases internal organic acids which brings the ph of the flow stream back to neutral. Hydrolysis causes the ph adjustment and therefore no additional chemical addition is necessary.

drainage time in sec Thermo-Chemical Hydrolysis 10000 1000 Sludge viscosity tests at KWU- (compensated for sludge density) water 1 mpa s 20,0 C 1000,0 kg/m³ glycerol 99,5 %tig, 1480 mpa s 19,6 C, 1260,0 kg/m³ 100 WAS Kenosha 19,6 C, TS 6,5%, GV 70,0%, 1026,3 kg/m³ 10 1 0 4 8 12 16 20 nozzle diameter in mm Reduced Viscosity Provides for: Lower mixing energy requirements Higher digester loading rates

Thermo-Chemical Hydrolysis Additional biogas production Before Project: 2012: 166,200 ft 3 /day 2013: 173,800 ft 3 /day 2014: 170,600 ft 3 /day After Project: Week of 2/29: 181,100 ft 3 /day (4-9% Increase) Week of 3/7: 187,300 ft 3 /day (8-13% Increase) Week of 3/14: 190,500 ft 3 /day (10-15% Increase)

Thermo-Chemical Hydrolysis Additional biogas production Before Project: 2012: 12.2 ft 3 /kg VS feed 2013: 13.4 ft 3 /kg VS feed 2014: 13.2 ft 3 /kg VS feed After Project: Since 1/21/16: 17.6 ft 3 /kg VS feed

Thermo-Chemical Hydrolysis Thermal Efficiency The blending of hydrolyzed TWAS and unheated thickened primary sludge results in a final temperature of roughly 40 o C (100 o F) which is ideal for the anaerobic digestion process All thermal energy required for the hydrolysis process is transferred into the digesters. Atmospheric Pressure The entire hydrolysis process is completed at atmospheric pressure Additional Volatile Solids Reduction Increased Dewaterability of Digested Sludge

Thermo-Chemical Hydrolysis Reactor: Two stage reactor with an outer and inner chamber Outer Chamber Recirculates the heated thickened WAS and caustic soda mixture Inner Chamber Acts as a buffer tank from which the transfer pump draws out of Volume - 516 ft 3 (3,860 gal) Diameter: Outer chamber 8.2 ft Inner chamber 6.1 ft Height - 15.85 ft

PONDUS Reactor Installation

Thermo-Chemical Hydrolysis Heat Exchanger: Corrugated tube in tube heat exchanger which creates turbulent flow resulting in: Greater heat transfer capabilities Reduced fouling of surface area Removable ends for easy inspection and maintenance Thumb screws allow ends to be easily removed for internal inspection and cleaning.

PONDUS Heat Exchanger

High Solids Anaerobic Digestion Before Project: Six functional anaerobic digesters 4 primary & 2 secondary Total capacity 633,550 ft 3 Unmixed Batch feeding operation based on 8-hour shifts Feed: Primary 3.3% TS and WAS 5.0% TS After Project: Three functional anaerobic digesters 2 primary & 1 secondary Total capacity 319,650 ft 3 Fully mixed with mechanical hydraulic mixing Continuous feeding operation Feed: Primary and WAS 7% TS

High Solids Anaerobic Digestion Hydraulic Retention Time (Average Day Flow): Prior to Project: Primary Digesters 30 days Current: Primary Digesters 17 days Ultimate Operation: Primary Digester 22 days Secondary Digester 15 days

Mechanical Hydraulic Mixing Rotamix by Vaughan Company System consists of: Chopper pump Internal piping Six nozzles (per digester) Benefits: More even heating of contents Improved volatile solids reduction Increased gas production

Mechanical Hydraulic Mixing

Biosolids Dewatering CS 21-4HC Centrifuge by Centrisys Corporation A dewatering centrifuge was installed at the WWTP in 2009. Replaced three plate and frame presses. The dewatering centrifuge has historically been fed digested sludge with a 2.7% TS concentration and consistently achieved 26-29% TS on the cake material. Due to the addition sludge thickening and PONDUS, the goal is to feed digested sludge with a 4.4% TS concentration and produce 30-32% TS solids.

Biosolids Dewatering

Drying of Biosolids Compact belt dryer by Sulzle-Klein Prior to this project the dewatered biosolids were manually loaded into a truck and disposed of at a local landfill. After the installation of the new System, the dewatered material leaving the dewatering centrifuge is dried using the recovered heat from the co-generation units as the thermal supply. The compact belt dryer achieves all the requirements of Class-A material (temperature, duration, and moisture content) and KWU is currently in the process of getting our final biosolids product re-classified with the Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources. The dried product is discharged into a conveyor system and automatically deposited into the bed of a dump truck.

Drying of Biosolids Parameter Maximum Throughput (at 30% DS) Heating Water Supply Temperature Heating Water Flow Heating Water Return Temperature Maximum Air Flow Value Units 2,315 lb/hr 194 o F 115 gpm 160-170 o F 6,050 ft 3 /min

Drying of Biosolids

Biogas Conditioning Gas conditioning and siloxane removal by Unison Solutions Prior to this project the raw biogas produced from the anaerobic digestion process was used as a fuel for our raw water pump engines, hot water boilers or flared to the atmosphere. Knowing a more efficient utilization of our biogas would be critical to an effective energy optimization project, a package system capable of removing moisture, particulates and siloxane was incorporated to condition and compress the biogas prior to use as a fuel source in the combined heat and power (CHP) generators.

Biogas Conditioning

Electric & Thermal Energy Generation CHP Generators by Kraft Power Prior to this project the electricity needed to run the equipment at the WWTP was purchased exclusively from the local utility. In addition, any heat needed for our operations were provided by our boilers using either natural gas or biogas as their fuel source. To better utilize the biogas produced during the digestion process we installed two combined heat and power (CHP) generators. These generators utilize the methane produced in the anaerobic digestion process as a fuel source to generate electricity as well as thermal energy.

Electric & Thermal Energy Generation The CHP units are each capable of producing: 330 kw of electrical energy 422 kw of thermal energy. The electricity produced will power the new system as well as supply the excess electricity to the main plant power network for beneficial use elsewhere throughout the plant. The thermal energy will be utilized by the PONDUS system, the compact belt dryer and the central WWTP heating loop.

Electric & Thermal Energy Generation

Odor Control KWT 1000/1300 by Sulzle-Klein Due to the wastewater plant being located adjacent to a residential neighborhood odor control was also incorporated into the design. A robust odor control system which utilizes water, sulfuric acid and caustic soda was installed to treat the exhaust air from the belt dryer as well as the aspiration air from the primary sludge mix tank, blended sludge mix tank, PONDUS reactor, primary sludge thickening centrifuge, WAS thickening centrifuge, dewatering centrifuge and dryer feed pump. Water is utilized to cool the exhaust and remove particulates from the air. The sulfuric acid is used to reduce or eliminate the ammonia odors from the biosolids process. Caustic soda is used to reduce or eliminate the odors from sulfur compounds such as mercaptans in the exhaust stream

Odor Control

Other Items Incorporated Into Project

Other Items Incorporated Into Project

Other Items Incorporated Into Project

Other Items Incorporated Into Project

Estimated Added Value Criteria Daily Annual Unit Cost Unit Annual Savings On-Peak Electricity (kwh) 4,536 1,655,640 $0.07660 per kwh $126,822 Off-Peak Electricity (kwh) 8,064 2,943,360 $0.05238 per kwh $154,173 Electric Demand (kw) 525 6,300 $12.65 per kw $79,695 Electrical Total $360,690 Cake Sludge (wet tons) 25 9,249 $38.01 per ton $351,554 Disposal Total $351,554 TOTAL Savings $712,244

Grant from Local Utility Due to the nature of the project KWU was awarded over $500,000 in grants for implementing the new biosolids process from Focus on Energy. The installation of the thermo-chemical hydrolysis system, co-generation units, and LED lighting all qualified for the largest grant this organization can award for a single project.

Conclusion Through innovative thinking KWU was able to: Become more energy efficient Less reliant on purchased electrical and thermal energy Reduce operating costs

Questions? Curtis Czarnecki, P.E. Director of Engineering Services Kenosha Water Utility 4401 Green Bay Road Kenosha, WI 53144 Phone (262)653-4306 Email: cczarnecki@kenosha.org