Kenosha Wastewater Treatment Plant - Energy Optimized Resource Recovery Project

Similar documents
Energy Optimized Resource Recovery Project Presented By: Curtis Czarnecki, P.E.

IMPACTS OF THERMOCHEMICAL HYDROLYSIS ON VISCOSITY, BIOGAS & DEWATERABILITY

Comprehensive Biosolids and Bioenergy Planning Authors: Cameron Clark* 1, Irina Lukicheva 1, Anna James 1, Kathy Rosinski 1, Dave Parry 1

Codigestion Case Studies Enhancing Energy Recovery From Sludge

Why THP Made Sense for TRA

Total Makeover for Biosolids Handling at DC Water s Blue Plains Advanced Wastewater Treatment Plant. February 2015

Chapter 2: Description of Treatment Facilities

Application of the AGF (Anoxic Gas Flotation) Process

Sustainable Energy Management

Center Sanitation District

SHAFDAN (Greater Tel Aviv Wastewater Treatment Plant) - Recent Upgrade and Expansion

January 25, Utility of the Future One City s Journey

Role of Entrant s Firm. »» Final Design»» Completion of Funding. »» Engineering Services During Applications. »» Plant Startup and Filtration

APPENDIX A. 1. Background. 1.1 Existing Facilities. Page 1

Anaerobic Digester Optimization with Bio-Organic Catalyst. NYWEA 81 st Annual Meeting February 3, 2009 One Year Study November 07 - November 08

EVALUATING ALTERNATIVES FOR DISPOSING OF WATER PLANT SOLIDS INTO A WASTEWATER PLANT

Dewatering Optimization Near-Term Savings and Long-Term Capital Planning

4 Angles. Pilot-scale Evaluation of AirPrex for Phosphorus Management. Innovation Program Phosphorus Initiative JTAC 4/22/2017

Thermal Hydrolysis Comes to Texas!

WWTP Side Stream Treatment of Nutrients Considerations for City of Raleigh s Bioenergy Recovery Project. Erika L. Bailey, PE, City of Raleigh

Anaerobic Digester Optimization with Bio-Organic Catalyst

POTW s As An Emergency Option For Dairy Manure Disposal

Anaerobic Digestion The New Frontier Ohio WEA Biosolids Specialty Workshop 11 December 2014 J. Hunter Long

Advanced Aerobic Digestion. ThermAer. Autothermal Thermophilic Aerobic Digestion. Biosolids Treatment. Thermal Process Systems ThermAer Process

WEF Residuals and Biosolids Conference Piloting to Establish Performance Criteria at Miami s South District WWTP

THERMAL HYDROLYSIS: DESIGN, COMMISSIONING AND LESSONS LEARNED THROUGH A HISTORY OF INSTALLATIONS GREG KNIGHT

ES.1 Solids Master Planning Background and Goals

City of Elk River Wastewater Treatment Facility Improvements. Achieving Wastewater Treatment Goals

WEAO STUDENT DESIGN COMPETITION 2019 PROJECT STATEMENT

Case History: Anaerobic and Aerobic Treatment of Textile Wastes at South Carolina Textile Plants. Introduction

EVALUATION OF ENERGY RECOVERY OPTIONS FOR CONVERSION OF AEROBIC DIGESTERS TO ANAEROBIC DIGESTION

VILLAGE OF ALGONQUIN 2014 WASTEWATER FACILITY PLAN UPDATE EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

DELHI CHARTER TOWNSHIP

Is It Really Cost-Effective to Use My Digester Gas? (Should I Be Co-Digesting?)

Taking the Waste out of WAS: Sludge Pretreatment for Beneficial Uses

FAIRMONT WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT

Chapter 5: Treatment Assessment Future Condition

HOW TO SAVE COSTS AND IMPROVE SUSTAINABILITY WHILE REDUCING EFFLUENT NITROGEN

Harrisburg Advanced Wastewater Treatment Facility Biosolids Facilities Improvement Plan Existing Conditions Report. February 2017

Utilizing Anaerobic Digester Capacity to Process Source Separated Organics: Two Case Studies

Copies: Mark Hildebrand (NCA) ARCADIS Project No.: April 10, Task A 3100

Report on Piloting of the Volute Dewatering Press at the Boonsboro WWTP in Boonsboro, MD July 25 th - July 29 th, 2016

Sludge Co-Thickening and Biogas Cogeneration in the Electric City

Sheboygan Regional WWTF s Waste to Energy. The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly

Solids Dewatering Modernization

The TRA CRWS Master Plan. Past, Present, & Future of CRWS. Kaylee Dusek, EIT, Garver Matt Jalbert, PE, TRA

<1ppm Phosphorus A BNR With No Chemical Addition Case Study

Evaluation of Energy Recovery Options for Conversion of Aerobic Digesters to Anaerobic Digestion

Providing Infrastructure Redundancy at the Rocky River WWTP. Timothy McCann AECOM Keith Bovard Rocky River WWTP

Generating Energy Through Co-Digestion

Lessons learnt from Installation (Action B1-B3)

Reduce Grid Required Energy to Utilize Your Wastewater Treatment Facility

Energy Efficiency in Wastewater Treatment

Holistic Approach to Plant Optimization for Biosolids Management

New high-rate plug flow anaerobic digester technology for small communities

Sulaibiya world s largest membrane water reuse project

SLUDGE TREATMENT AND DISPOSAL

Post-Aerobic Digester with Bioaugmentation Pilot Study City of Meridian, ID WWTP PNCWA 2010

WWETCO FlexFilter and Bio-FlexFilter

Digester Gas Utilization at SWRP Where Should the Biogas Go?

Nitrogen and Phosphorus Harvesting and Reuse

Biosolids Monthly Report

Thermal Hydrolysis The Next Generation

Anaerobic Digestion and High Strength Waste Co-Digestion Panel Discussion

Performance Evaluation of the Moores Creek Advanced Water Resource Recovery Facility

MDEQ Observations on Sustainability

COMMISSION MEETING. April 18, Engineering and Construction Team. Piscataway WWTP Bio-Energy Commissioners Status Briefing

9/27/2013. Regulation vs. Space Time & Temperature.Weather!

CEDAR CREEK Wastewater Treatment Facility

June 19, 2013 Annual OWEA Conference Steven Reese, P.E.

4/23/2012. Program development to Preliminary Design level by the Biosolids Program Manager. Thermal hydrolysis/digestion challenges and innovations

Transitioning to a Thermal Drying Program at DWSD. March 3, 2015

BIOLOGICAL WASTEWATER BASICS

A Battle to Be the Best: A Comparison of Two Powerful Sidestream Treatment Technologies: Post Aerobic Digestion and Anammox

Appendix B-1. Design Calculations for Sewage Treatment Plant

CHEMICAL FREE PHOSPHOROUS ELIMINSTION P-UPTAKE PROCESS

Duffin Creek Water Pollution Control Plant Technical Information

Wastewater Treatment. Where does wastewater go when it leaves your house?

PERMIT TO OPERATE SILVER CLOUD CT., MONTEREY, CA TELEPHONE (831) FAX (831)

Your Problem. Current Practices. Survey about Storage. Thinking about Cost. Mixed waste {Your truck} Your Resources Options Future

CITY OF FORT MYERS SOUTH ADVANCED WASTEWATER TREATMENT FACILITY

Biological Phosphorus Removal Technology. Presented by: Eugene Laschinger, P.E.

ANAEROBIC SLUDGE DIGESTION PROCESS. Prepared By Michigan Department of Environmental Quality Operator Training and Certification Unit

Struvite Harvesting: Creating Value From Wastewater?

INTERESTINGLY ATAD: OPERATIONAL DATA FROM THE NEW ATADS IN ONTARIO

Anaerobic Digestion Fundamentals

High Value Resources from High Strength Wastes: Leveraging Food Production Byproducts to Reduce BNR Costs

Excellence in Engineering Since 1946

HIGH PERFORMANCE ANAEROBIC DIGESTION

To Digest or Incinerate Sludge That is the Question

Energy Neutral Opportunities

New Developments in BioWin 5.2

Current Treatment Approaches and Planning for the Future A Panel Discussion

What Can Biosolids Do for You? Shifting towards Solids as an Energy Resource

ENVIRONMENTAL VISITATION CENTER ALEGRIA WWTP

From Private to Public Dayton s Journey into the Biosolids Business. Jason Tincu, WWT Administrator June 19, 2013

Product Overview. Eco-efficient solids separation

Thermophilic anaerobic digestion for increased biogas production and pathogen control

PHOSPHORUS RECOVERY FROM SEWAGE SLUDGE USING THE AQUACRITOX SUPERCRITICAL WATER OXIDATION PROCESS

Sludge Workshop 3rd April 2017 Zagreb. Isabelle LEBLANC -

Transcription:

Kenosha Wastewater Treatment Plant - Energy Optimized Resource Recovery Project Prepared By: Curt Czarnecki, P.E. Kenosha Water Utility Presented By: Joseph Hughes, P.E. Centrisys Corporation MIWEA June 21 st, 2016

Thanks & Acknowledgement The entire Kenosha Water Utility (KWU) Staff, including: Ed St. Peter, Curt Czarnecki, Melissa Arnot, Katie Karow, & Tom Tetzlaff J. F. Ahern General Contractor Pieper Power Electrical Contractor CD Smith Civil Contractor Donohue & Associates Engineer including Dennis Dineen & Allen Williams Centrisys Corp. including Geoff Harvey & Christine Smith CNP Gerhard Forstner

Presentation Outline Kenosha Water Utility (KWU) and Wastewater Treatment Plant (WWTP) Overview Drivers for Energy Optimized Resource Recovery Project Technology Overview Preliminary Results Economics (Added Value) Conclusion

WWTP Service Area Overview Population: 110,000 Service Area: 85.7 mi 2 (222 km 2 ) Collection System Gravity Sewer System: 332 mi (535 km) Lift Stations: 13 Permitted Annual Average Daily Flow: 28.6 MGD (1.253 m 3 /s) 2015 Annual Average Daily Flow: 21.9 MGD (0.961 m 3 /s) Effluent Discharge: Lake Michigan

WWTP Loadings Average Day (Current Loadings Based on 2015 Data): BOD Influent: 32,910 lbs/day (180 mg/l) Effluent: 2,475 lbs/day (13 mg/l) 92% Removal TSS Influent: 32,863 lbs/day (180 mg/l) Effluent: 1,415 lbs/day (8 mg/l) 96% Removal Ammonia Influent: 4,881 lbs/day (27 mg/l) Effluent: 530 lbs/day (3 mg/l) 89% Removal Phosphorus Influent: 533 lbs/day (3 mg/l) Effluent: 85 lbs/day (0.5 mg/l) 84% Removal

Sludge Characteristics Primary Sludge: Average Flow: 68,620 gal/day (260 m 3 /day) Solids Concentration: 3.3% Solids Production: 19,020 lbs/day (8,626 kg/day) Volatility: 77% Waste Activated Sludge (WAS): Average Flow: 151,350 gal/day (570 m 3 /day) Solids Concentration: 1.05% Solids Production: 13,010 lbs/day (5,900 kg/day) Volatility: 72% Digested Sludge Solids Concentration: 2.7% Volatile Solids: 54% Volatile Solids Reduction: 60% Sludge to Landfill (2015): 2,500 dry US tons, 2,270 dry metric tons

Motivation Behind Project Aging WWTP infrastructure An effort to combat ever rising utility costs: Natural Gas Electricity Reduce or eliminate landfill disposal fees

Project Objectives Increase biogas production Generate electricity from biogas Achieve 90% dry and Class A biosolids Utilize waste heat as the main thermal energy supply Maintain existing effluent quality Maintain or decrease noise, odor and particulate levels

Design Approach Wisconsin allows for design/build approach on resource recovery projects Design/Build was utilized due to the varying technologies and complexity of the project. In the RFP the design/builder was tasked with the following: Preparation of the design Assisting KWU in obtaining all necessary permits Procuring, constructing and installing all components Integrating the new system with the existing plant SCADA network Startup and commissioning Preparation of O & M manuals Warrantying the system

Anaerobic Digestion Modifications Digesters Before Project 4 primary 2 secondary After Project 2 primary 1 secondary Total Capacity 633,550 ft 3 319,650 ft 3 Mixing Condition Sludge Feed Operation Feed HRT in digesters Unmixed Batch feeding operation based on 8-hour shifts Primary (3.3% TS) WAS (5.0% TS) Primary=30 days Fully mixed with mechanical hydraulic mixing Continuous feed Primary (7% TS) WAS (7% TS) Current operation: Primary=17 days Ultimate Operation: Primary=22 days

Mechanical Hydraulic Mixing Rotamix by Vaughan Company System consists of: Chopper pump Internal piping Six nozzles (per digester) Benefits: More even heating of contents Improved volatile solids reduction Increased gas production

Primary Sludge Thickening Centrifuge THK 200 by Centrisys Corporation Before Project: Gravity thickened sludge (3.3% TS) pumped directly from the clarifiers into the digesters Operational Characteristics Sludge Feed: 3.1% TS Cake Material: 6.1% TS Avg. Power Consumption: 5.7 kw Capture Rate Without Polymer: 89% With Polymer: 98%* *Emulsion Cationic Polymer 46% active @ 0.5 gallons/hour

WAS Thickening Centrifuge THK 200 by Centrisys Corporation Prior to our partnership: A DAFT system was utilized to thicken the WAS flow stream from 1% TS to 3.5-4.0% solids before being pumped into the digesters A WAS thickening centrifuge was previously pilot tested and installed in 2011 Due to downstream limitations the WAS flow stream was thickened to roughly 5% solids with the thickening centrifuge This project allowed us to further thicken the WAS flow stream to 7% solids

WAS Thickening Centrifuge Installation Operational Characteristics Sludge Feed: 1.1-1.3% TS Cake Material: 6.9% TS Average Power Consumption: 13.6 kw Capture Rate: Without Polymer: 90% With Polymer: 97%* *Emulsion Cationic Polymer 46% active @ 0.2 gallons/hour

Thermo-Chemical Hydrolysis PONDUS by CNP-Technology Water and Biosolids Corporation Components of Hydrolysis Process: Thermo: TWAS is heated to 140-160 o F (60-70 o C) Chemical: 1.5 to 2.0 liters of caustic soda (50% concentration) is injected per 1 m 3 of TWAS Detention Time: Circulation through the reactor and heat exchanger for 2 to 2.5 hours.

Thermo-Chemical Hydrolysis

Thermo-Chemical Hydrolysis ph Upon addition of caustic soda ph = 11 (+/-) Following hydrolysis process ph = 6.8 to 7.0 Hydrolysis process breaks down the cell walls and releases internal organic acids which brings the ph of the flow stream back to neutral. Hydrolysis causes the ph adjustment and therefore no additional chemical addition is necessary prior to anaerobic digestion process.

Thermo-Chemical Hydrolysis Thermal Efficiency The blending of hydrolyzed TWAS and unheated thickened primary sludge results in a final temperature of roughly 40 o C (100 o F) which is ideal for the mesophilic anaerobic digestion process All thermal energy required for the hydrolysis process is transferred into the digesters. Atmospheric Pressure The entire hydrolysis process is completed at atmospheric pressure Additional Volatile Solids Reduction Volatile solids reduction of 60% (before) and 65% (currently) Increased Dewaterability of Digested Sludge

PONDUS Reactor Installation

PONDUS Heat Exchanger

Drainage time (sec) Thermo-Chemical Hydrolysis 10000 Sludge viscosity tests at KWU (compensated for sludge density) water 1 mpa s 20,0 C 1000,0 kg/m³ 1000 100 10 glycerol 99,5 %tig, 1480 mpa s 19,6 C, 1260,0 kg/m³ WAS Kenosha 19,6 C, TS 6,5%, GV 70,0%, 1026,3 kg/m³ 1 0 4 8 12 16 20 Nozzle diameter in mm Reduced Viscosity Provides for: Lower mixing energy requirements Higher digester loading rates drain flow hydrolysis c138/input 15 gpm 71,0 C, TS 6,5%, GV 70,0%, 1005,3 kg/m³

Cubic feet per day Biogas Production Additional Biogas Production 240,000 220,000 2-Week Average Daily Biogas Production Increased Biogas Production from 2012 level (Contract Base Year) 50% 40% 200,000 180,000 192,502 181,039 185,771 176,316 184,358 178,676 30% 160,000 140,000 120,000 100,000 149,012 0% 155,826 152,956 155,384 4% 3% 4% 2012 2013 2014 2/22/16-3/6/16 23% 3/7/16-3/20/16 18% 20% 3/21/16-4/3/16 4/4/16-4/17/16 15% 4/18/16-5/1/16 19% 5/2/16-5/15/16 17% 5/16/15-5/29/16 20% 10% 0%

Biogas Conditioning Gas conditioning and siloxane removal by Unison Solutions Before Project: Raw biogas was utilized by Raw water pump engines Hot water boilers Flared to the atmosphere A package system was incorporated to condition and compress the biogas moisture particulates siloxane

Electric & Thermal Energy Generation

Electric & Thermal Energy Generation CHP Generators by Kraft Power Before Project: All electricity was purchased exclusively from the local utility. All heat was provided by our boilers using either natural gas or biogas as their fuel source. Two combined heat and power (CHP) generators were installed to utilize the biogas as a fuel source to generate electrical as well as thermal energy. The CHP units are each capable of producing: 330 kw of electrical energy 422 kw of thermal energy The electricity produced will power the new system as well as supply the excess electricity to the main plant power network for beneficial use elsewhere throughout the plant. The thermal energy will be utilized by the PONDUS system, the compact belt dryer and the central WWTP heating loop.

Isometric Project Overview Heat Biogas Electricity Biosolids

Biosolids Dewatering CS 21-4HC Centrifuge by Centrisys Corporation The centrifuge was installed in 2009 & replaced three plate and frame presses. This project met or exceeded all design criteria and provided a payback of one year! The dewatering centrifuge has historically been fed digested sludge with a 2.7% TS concentration and consistently achieved 26-29% TS on the cake material.

Centrifuge Room

Drying of Biosolids Compact belt dryer by Sulzle-Klein Previously dewatered biosolids went to local landfill Now, biosolids are dried using the recovered heat from the co-generation units as the thermal supply. The belt dryer achieves all the requirements of Class-A and KWU is currently in the process of getting our final biosolids product re-classified with the Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources. The dried product is discharged into a conveyor system and automatically deposited into the bed of a dump truck.

Drying of Biosolids

Drying of Biosolids Distributor extrudes the biosolids into noodle-like strands to maximize the surface area for maximum evaporation capacity

Drying of Biosolids

Odor Control KWT 1000/1300 by Sulzle-Klein Treats the exhaust air from the belt dryer, the buffer & mix tanks, the PONDUS reactor, and the thickening & dewatering centrifuges. Water cools the exhaust air and removes particulates. Sulfuric acid neutralizes ammonia odors. Caustic soda neutralizes sulfur compounds such as mercaptans.

Other Items Incorporated Into Project

Other Items Incorporated Into Project

Other Items Incorporated Into Project

Other Items Incorporated Into Project

Other Items Incorporated Into Project

Other Items Incorporated Into Project

Other Items Incorporated Into Project

Estimated Added Value Criteria Daily Annual Unit Cost Unit Annual Savings On-Peak Electricity (kwh) 4,752 1,734,480 $0.07660 per kwh $132,861 Off-Peak Electricity (kwh) 8,448 3,083,520 $0.05238 per kwh $161,515 Electric Demand (kw) 550 6,600 $12.65 per kw $83,490 Cake Sludge (wet tons) Electrical Total $377,866 25 9,249 $38.01 per ton $351,554 Disposal Total $351,554 TOTAL Value $729,420

Grant from Local Utility Due to the nature of the project KWU was awarded over $500,000 in grants for implementing the new biosolids process from Focus on Energy. The installation of the thermo-chemical hydrolysis system, co-generation units, and LED lighting all qualified for the largest grant this organization awards to an individual project.

Conclusion Through innovative thinking KWU was able to: Become more energy efficient Less reliant on purchased electrical and thermal energy, reducing operating costs Produce a higher quality end product (Class A Biosolids)

Questions? Curtis Czarnecki, P.E. Director of Engineering Services Kenosha Water Utility 4401 Green Bay Road Kenosha, WI 53144 Phone (262)653-4306 cczarnecki@kenosha.org Joe Hughes Project Manager Centrisys Corp. Phone: (262) 716-9949 Joseph.hughes@centrisys.us