BCOSSA Technical Review Committee Technical Bulletin

Similar documents
BCOSSA Technical Review Committee Technical Bulletin

SPM V2 Dashboard Manual Contents

Groundwater Mounding Causes, Issues and Prevention

APPENDIX 5 On Site Sewage Treatment and Disposal 1. Site Requirements

Septic Tank Soil Treatment Systems

On-Site Wastewater Disposal Site Assessment, Subsoil Investigation and Site Evaluation Checklist

NS On-site Sewage Disposal Systems Technical Guidelines: Summary of Changes January 2013

Source of Pollution or Groundwater Solution?

Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) Bureau of Point and Non-Point Source Management Harrisburg, PA

Viruses from septic systems. Ian Ralston and Michael Payne

Montana. Design and Installation Manual for the Infiltrator ATL TM System in Montana. Infiltrator ATL System in Montana

Transitioning from the Percolation Test to Soils Evaluation Colorado Environmental Health Association Annual Education Conference 2015

SEWERAGE SYSTEM STANDARD PRACTICE MANUAL

Complex Sewage Disposal Course 2017

AS/NZS 1547:2012 and AS/NZS 1547:2000 On-site Domestic Wastewater Management CONTENTS COMPARISON [PART A: AS/NZS 1547:2012 LISTED ORDER]

AS/NZS 1547:2012 and AS/NZS 1547:2000 On-site Domestic Wastewater Management CONTENTS COMPARISON [PART B: AS/NZS 1547:2000 LISTED ORDER]

Arizona Design & Installation Manual

G u i d e l i n e s f o r U s i n g I m p o r t e d S o i l for Onsite Wastewater Systems in Marginal Soil-Site Conditions

Unit 1 - Introduction, Testing Criteria, and Design Criteria 1-1 Introduction 1-2 Testing Criteria Requirements 1-3 System Design Requirements

Design Guideline for Gravity Systems in Soil Type 1. January 2009

Alternate Systems Guidance

Private Sewage Systems Standard of Practice Proposed Revisions

PRODUCER STATEMENT SYSTEMS (T.P.58) DESIGN: ON-SITE EFFLUENT DISPOSAL

Other Septic Tank Effluent Dispersal Options

Design and Installation Manual for the Infiltrator ATL System in British Columbia

Bruce Lesikar, PhD Texas A & M University University Curriculum Development for Decentralized Wastewater Management

Large On-Site Sewage Systems Wastewater Treatment Workshop

DRIP EMITTER SYSTEM STUDY GUIDE

Design Solutions: Dealing With New Code Issues

Mono County Health Department Construction Guide for Residential and Commercial On-Site Sewage Treatment & Disposal System I.

Site and Soil Evaluation for Sewage Treatment and Dispersal

Private Sewage Disposal System Permit Application

Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) Bureau of Point and Non-Point Source Management Harrisburg, PA

Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) Bureau of Water Standards and Facility Regulation Harrisburg, PA

ONSITE SEWERAGE SYSTEMS

RI Site Specific Soil Mapping Standards and Procedures

A. GENERAL PROPERTY INFORMATION. Applicant s name Day Phone Installer Name Send permit to installer. B. PROPERTY DESCRIPTION

Calculating Length and Width for Limiting Zone with 20 Inches of Suitable Soil

A. GENERAL PROPERTY INFORMATION. Applicant s name Day Phone Installer Name Send permit to installer. B. PROPERTY DESCRIPTION

Urban Soil Conservation and Management

1.0 BACKGROUND 2.0 DIAGRAMS. The attached diagrams illustrate a typical NDDS system. 3.0 CDPHE OWTS REGULATION #43

MINIMUM STANDARDS FOR DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION OF ONSITE WASTEWATER SYSTEMS

PRIVATE SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM APPLICATION FORM

64E System Size Determinations.

City of Vineland Health Department 640 E. Wood Street, Vineland, NJ (856) (ph.) / (856) (fax)

Mounded Wastewater Treatment Systems

Michigan Criteria for On-Site Wastewater Treatment ~~~~~~~

Pressure Distribution Design

Producer Statement. Design: On-Site Effluent Disposal Systems (AS/NZS 1547:2012)

No-till Oklahoma. Soil Compaction. Jason Warren Oklahoma State University Dept. Plant and Soil Sciences

April 26, 2017 DTC File No: J Re: Sewage Dispersal Inspection/Assessment and Filing for 7110 Westside Road, Kelowna, B.C.

AESI AESI 6/17/2015 HOW AND WHERE DOES INFILTRATION WORK? o Context: Summary of Geologic History. o Constraints/benefits for different geologic units

APPLICATION GUIDE ON-SITE SEWAGE SYSTEM PERMIT

PSDS Design - Worksheet "M"

Work Sheet #6 Assessing the Risk of Groundwater Contamination from Household Wastewater Treatment

Producer Statement. Design: On-Site Effluent Disposal Systems (AS/NZS 1547:2000)

ON-SITE SEWAGE PERMITTING PROCESS

Athabasca County th Avenue Athabasca, AB T9S 1M8 Phone: (780) Toll Free: (844) Fax: (780)

INFORMATION REQUIRED

Geotechnical Investigation Long Timber Brewing Building Highway 99 and Kelly Street Monroe, Oregon TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Manual refers to the Approval issued by the Ohio Department of Health on June 23, 2010.

PROJECT NO A. ISSUED: February 29, 2016

On-site Systems and Groundwater Washington State Department of Health February 6, 2014

Tom Fritts

TABLE 1 OAR MINIMUM SEPARATION DISTANCES

How & Where does infiltration work? Context: Summary of Geologic History Constraints/benefits for different geologic units

SECTION TRENCH SAFETY PART 1 - GENERAL

I/We propose to install enlarge replace a sewage system to serve a: proposed single family dwelling existing single family dwelling other premises.

Private Sewage System Design Example/Template. Field. PREFACE (Version April 1, 2013)

October 6, The Honorable Raymond R. Krause Chief Administrative Law Judge 600 North Robert Street PO Box St. Paul, MN

TRANSFORMER 150' SETBACK FROM 98' CONTOUR LAWN PLANTER PLANTER TEMPORARY BENCHMARK SPIKE 26" BASSWOOD ELEV.=139.36' PLANTER EXISTING 12" CMP

PRIVATE SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM APPLICATION FORM

9. SOIL PERMEABILITY. 9.0 Why is it important to determine soil permeability?

Soil Physical Properties and Wastewater Treatment

Determination of Design Infiltration Rates for the Sizing of Infiltration based Green Infrastructure Facilities

Weekly Safety Talks: Excavation & Trenching Application

Permit #: Application Date: DD / MMM / YYYY Estimated Project Completion Date: DD / MMM / YYYY

Enviro-Septic Wastewater Treatment Systems Design and Installation Manual Vermont State Attachment

The Inspections Group Inc Avenue NW EDMONTON AB T5G 0E6 Phone:

PRE-ENGINEERED DESIGNS

What is the Vadose Zone? Why Do We Care? Tiffany Messer Assistant Professor Biological Systems Engineering School of Natural Resources University of

Presby Wastewater Treatment Systems. Indiana

GEO-flow Pipe Leaching System Specifications & Features. Design & Installation Manual Indiana

Excavation &Trenching

Merrill Crescent Septic Assessment, Lot 106, Merrill Rd., Madeira Park

SMALL WASTEWATER FACILITY APPLICATION PACKET

Appendix 1. Schedules 5, 6, 7 and 8

Private Sewage System Design Document Template PREFACE

Septic Tank Guidelines

Pollution Control Agency Rules Relating to Subsurface Sewage Treatment Systems AMENDMENTS TO CHAPTERS 7080, 7081, 7082 AND 7083

APPLICATION FOR RESOURCE CONSENT ONSITE SEWAGE WASTEWATER DISCHARGE TO LAND. Office Use Only. Location

BURLINGTON COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT 15 PIONEER BOULEVARD, WESTAMPTON PO BOX 6000 MOUNT HOLLY, NEW JERSEY 08060

Ponds: planning, design, and construction

November 2007 DRAFT Appendix E: Soil Testing Criteria

NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES DIVISION OF PUBLIC HEALTH ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH SECTION ON-SITE WATER PROTECTION BRANCH

PART 2D. Section 7.2 of SJRWMD Special Publication SJ93-SP10

June 1, To Whom It May Concern: Introduction:

Alternative Dispersal Options

Subdivision Standards

Transcription:

BCOSSA Technical Review Committee Technical Bulletin Title: Site Capability Tables Subject: Provides the Site Capability Table standards of the SPM V2 in a more accessible format, with a summary table for gravity dispersal systems. Relates to SPM Version: Version 2, 21 st September 2007 TB Number: TB7 Version: R1 Date: January 2009 Principal authors: Ian Ralston Contact: TRC Technical Support line at 1-877-475-2838 Email: trc@bcossa.com Page 1 of 9

The Technical Review Committee of BCOSSA provides technical bulletins to users as an aid to clarify aspects of the Sewerage System Standard Practice Manual that have not been fully explored or are susceptible to technological or methodological changes, with the understanding that neither the contributors, the British Columbia On Site Sewage Association nor the Ministry of Health are providing advice, clarification or instruction in relation to any practical application of the technical bulletins or the Standard Practice Manual. Technical Bulletin users must exercise their own judgment about the accuracy, utility and applicability of the technical bulletins generally or in the particular circumstances of the situation in which they hope to apply the information in the technical bulletins as an aid to their judgment or procedure. In addition, the users must refer to the relevant provider of the information, the manufacturer or license holder of the technology, the designers, experts and other sources. The contributors, the British Columbia On Site Sewage Association and the Ministry of Health can accept no responsibility for any error or omissions in the technical bulletins and expressly disclaim such responsibility Page 2 of 9

1. Site Capability Table 2-12 1.1 Introduction The SPM V2 in Section 2.4 provides Site Capability tables to address sites with particular constraints (Table 2-12), and to summarize application of particular systems (Table 2-13). The tables take a oriented approach, offering s and alternate s for common site constraints. Discussion of the tables is expanded in Part 3 of the SPM, Section 3.4. Section 3.4 also provides advice for other site constraints, selection of vertical separation (VS), climate and combined site constraints. There has been some confusion over the use and reading of the tables. This Technical Bulletin presents the individual rows of Table 2-12 as separate tables, with explanatory notes where needed. Section 2 provides a summary table for gravity dispersal systems to clarify application. 1.2 Table 2-12 individual rows Organization of Table 2-12 in the SPM: Each row of the Table 2-12 starts with a soil type or other constraining. It then describes the reason or that constrains the use of the site. It then presents a or group of s. In most cases it then offers one or more alternative s. The last column provides clarification notes. In all cases site and project specific design by a professional per the SPM is an alternate. The individual tables below have been reorganized to show each row from Table 2-12, and some explanation added where needed. A correction to the first two rows has also been made. Note that these tables must be used together with the other standards of the SPM particularly the Vertical and Horizontal separation tables. Page 3 of 9

Gravel and very gravelly sand (Kfs >5,000 mm/d, Perc. <1 min/inch) Very high permeability Pressure distribution with Timed dosing and Type 2 10/10 or Type 3 effluent. Professional design or design review needed. Sand mound or sand-lined trench with low hydraulic application rate Timed dosing and a minimum of 24" (61 cm) mound sand Many jurisdictions do not allow use of these soils for onsite systems, treatment in soil is severely reduced. For the alternative, low hydraulic application rate (HAR) timed dosing (at <10% of sand water holding capacity) should be used, per Section 3.8, or minimum 90cm sand depth with timed dosing per Section 3.8. Gravelly sand (Kfs 3,501 5000 mm/d, Perc. <2 1 min/inch) High permeability Pressure distribution with Timed dosing Sand mound or sand-lined trench with Timed dosing Except where native soil vertical separation is greater than 1.83 m (72") Pressure distribution with timed dosing will improve pathogen removal. Coarse to medium sand/loamy sand (Kfs 1,500 3,500 mm/d, Perc. 2 5 min/inch). High permeability Pressure distribution This does not mean Fine Sand and Loamy Fine Sand. Except where native soil vertical separation is greater than 1.83 m (72") The exception for large VS in native soil in these two rows allows gravity dispersal to be used when the native soil VS is large enough. This is because in that case adequate pathogen removal is expected to occur despite the poor distribution. Note the common misunderstanding about Fine Sand and Loamy Fine Sand. These soils have an expected Kfs range of 250-1500 mm/dy and are suitable for normal gravity distribution (assuming there is adequate VS per the SPM VS tables). Page 4 of 9

Over 50% of soil is rock fragments larger than gravel, or over 60% coarse gravel (or in combination over 60% total coarse gravel and rock fragments) Risk of effluent short circuiting due to large fractures, and severely reduced soil area for dispersal and treatment. Pressure distribution with Timed dosing and Type 3 effluent (requires professional design) Only where vertical separation to water table is over 1.83 m (72"): 1. Sand mound or sand-lined trench with Timed dosing (and reduced basal loading rate). 2. Subsurface Drip Distribution, with Type 2 10/10 Base HLR and LLR on the non-gravel/rock portion of the soil and reduce loading rate by percentage of rock fragments/gravel. In this case the large VS is again used to permit a simpler, note that this is separation to water table and may include separation in fractured rock as well as in soils (as long as the soil VS meets the standards of the SPM VS tables). The HLR and LLR should be reduced in proportion to the percentage of coarse fragments. Loam, Silt Loam and Silt soils with platy structure of weak grade Requires low hydraulic application rate AND unsuitable for infiltrative surface. System or sand mound, with infiltrative surface a minimum of 18" (45 cm) above platy layer. AND Pressure distribution with low hydraulic application rate timed dosing. For plough pan or thin layers with acceptable soils below: Remediation (where possible) OR sand-lined trenches penetrating below the layer (where suitable). If platy structure is noted on a site, site investigation should include a minimum of 4 observation test pits in the dispersal area and two in the receiving area. Site investigation should establish that remediation has succeeded where this is used. This does not prevent use of gravity dispersal with Loam, Silt Loam and Silt soils with more favourable structure (example blocky). See SPM Appendix Q for discussion of Hydraulic Application Rate. Page 5 of 9

Sandy clay, silty clay or clay soils (with moderate or strong BK, GR or P structure) (Kfs 20 60 mm/d, Perc >60 min/inch) Low permeability Pressure distribution with Type 2 10/10 or 3 effluent and timed dosing Sand mound, OR Lagoon, where appropriate, OR ET/ETA bed, where appropriate In the majority of cases these soils will have a clay content of over 40% (see row on clay soils) Sandy clay, silty clay or clay soils (with weak BK, GR or P structure) Low permeability, requires low HAR and unsuitable for infiltrative surface System (Type 2 or 3) or Sand mound, with infiltrative surface a minimum of 18 (45 cm) above these soils AND pressure distribution with timed dosing Lagoon, where appropriate, OR ET/ETA bed, where appropriate In the majority of cases these soils will have a clay content of over 40% (see row on clay soils) This will require use of sand fill or sand mound with these soils. Soil contains greater than 40% clay OR Kfs less than 20 mm/day, 120 min/inch Perc HLR table and LLR tables should be reduced Pressure distribution with Timed dosing (low HAR timed dosing recommended), and Type 2 10/10 or Type 3 effluent Professional design or design review Sand mound with Timed dosing and a minimum of 24" mound sand. Professional to establish basal HLR and LLR; OR Lagoon or ET/ETA bed, where appropriate Also applies where soil contains significant amounts of expandable clay minerals SPM Appendix I provides further information on expanding clay soils. An ROWP could design the alternative as long as the professional provided the loading rates. Some clay soils are shown as not recommended or not suitable in Table 28 (see below). Page 6 of 9

Organic soils, peat Difficulty in establishing a suitable HLR Professional to establish HLR and LLR These soils may also indicate water table issues. Soils labelled as not recommended in the HLR or LLR tables, or where the HLR or LLR tables show a zero Low permeability Pressure distribution with Timed dosing and Type 2 10/10 or Type 3 effluent. Professional design or design review Sand mound with Timed dosing and a minimum of 24" mound sand. Professional to establish basal HLR and LLR; OR Lagoon, where appropriate, OR ETA bed, where appropriate An ROWP could design the alternative as long as the professional provided the loading rates. Soils with a consistency stronger than moderately hard (dry), firm (moist), or of any cemented class HLR table and LLRs should be reduced Professional design or design review and Professional to establish HLR and LLR Lagoon or ET/ETA bed, where appropriate Page 7 of 9

Depth of SHWT or low permeability layer less than 18" (45 cm) below surface Low vertical separation Pressure distribution with Type 3 effluent, plus sand fill Sand mound per SPM standards, where appropriate See VS tables (Table 2-4 and 2-5 of the SPM). 2. Summary table for gravity systems 2.1 Introduction Table 2-13 includes a summary of constraints for gravity systems, there are also some other key s elsewhere in the SPM. This has led to some confusion, so this summary table extracts the key s for selection of a gravity system. Page 8 of 9

2.2 Summary table for gravity systems Other s Gravity system? Fine sand/fine loamy sand; Sandy loam; Loam; Silt loam; silt Loam; Silt Loam; Silt Clay loam;, sandy clay loam; silty clay loam; Sandy clay, silty clay or clay Gravel and very gravelly sands Gravelly sand; Coarse to Medium sand/sandy loam Fill below system Blinding layer Slope over 15% Infiltrative surface over 93 m 2 (1,000 ft 2 ) 36 or over VS in native soil (can include blinding layer) Platy structure VS is over 1.83 m (72") in Native Soil Other than blinding layer Up to 10cm (4 ) of C33 sand or Mound Sand Trickling Dosed to D Box Dosed serial or sequential Trickling Dosed Page 9 of 9