Effect of the start-up length on the biological nutrient removal process

Similar documents
ADVANCING NOVEL PROCESSES FOR BIOLOGICAL NUTRIENT REMOVAL

BIOLOGICAL PHOSPHORUS AND NITOGEN REMOVAL IN A SQUENCHING BATCH MOVING BED BIOFILM REACTOR

NITROUS OXIDE EMISSION DEPENDING ON THE TYPE OF ELECTRON ACCEPTOR BY A DENITRIFYING PHOSPHORUS REMOVAL SLUDGE

Removal of High C and N Contents in Synthetic Wastewater Using Internal Circulation of Anaerobic and Anoxic/Oxic Activated Sludge Processes

Biological Phosphorous Removal Is Coming! Michigan Water Environment Association Annual Conference, June 23, 2008; Boyne Falls MI

EFFECT OF FERROUS SULPHATE ON THE SIMULTANEOUS ORGANIC MATTER AND NUTRIENT REMOVAL PERFORMANCE OF SEQUENCING BATCH REACTOR

Characterisation and biological treatability of Izmit industrial and domestic wastewater treatment plant wastewaters

Mathematical Modelling of Wastewater Treatment Plant of Žiar nad Hronom

Chapter 4: Advanced Wastewater Treatment for Phosphorous Removal

Effect of Temperature Shock on Activities of Phosphorus-accumulating Organisms

ChemScan PROCESS ANALYZERS

ONSITE TREATMENT. Amphidrome

Characteristics of Nutrient Removal in Vertical Membrane Bioreactors

NEW BIOLOGICAL PHOSPHORUS REMOVAL CONCEPT SUCCESSFULLY APPLIED IN A T-DITCH PROCESS WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT

CRUDE COD CHARACTERISTICS SIGNIFICANT FOR BIOLOGICAL P REMOVAL: A U.K. EXAMPLE

Key Points. The Importance of MCRT/SRT for Activated Sludge Control. Other (Confusing) Definitions. Definitions of SRT

USE OF GRANULAR SLUDGE TO INCREASE THE CAPACITY OF SEQUENCING BATCH REACTORS

USING NUMERICAL SIMULATION SOFTWARE FOR IMPROVING WASTEWATER TREATMENT EFFICIENCY

THE IMPACT OF AROMATIC HYDROCARBONS (BTX'S) ON SEWAGE QUALITY TREATED BY THE BIOLOGICAL METHOD

Dynamics of Wastewater Treatment Systems

Modelling of Wastewater Treatment Plants

Use of Activate Sludge Model No. 3 and Bio-P module for simulating five-stage step-feed enhanced biological phosphorous removal process

SIMULATION AND CALIBRATION OF A FULL- SCALE SEQUENCING BATCH REACTOR FOR WASTEWATER TREATMENT

CE421/521 Environmental Biotechnology. Nitrogen and Phosphorus Cycles Lecture Tim Ellis

Contents General Information Abbreviations and Acronyms Chapter 1 Wastewater Treatment and the Development of Activated Sludge

operation of continuous and batch reactors. Contrary to what happens in the batch reactor, the substrate (BOD) of the wastewater in the continuous rea

Wastewater Pollutants & Treatment Processes. Dr. Deniz AKGÜL Marmara University Department of Environmental Engineering

Optimization of BNR from Wastewater Using SBR and A 2 O Processes. Guo, Lei (Eric)

Study on Effect of Soy sauce wastewater by SBR process Jinlong Zuo1, Xiaoyue Wang1, Xinguo Yang1,Daxiang Chen1,Xuming Wang2*

AquaNereda Aerobic Granular Sludge Technology

N2O EMISSION FROM A NITRITATION DOUBLE-SLUDGE SYSTEM TREATING WASTEWATER WITH A HIGH CONCENTRATION OF AMMONIUM

SBR PROCESS FOR WASTEWATER TREATMENT

Aqua MSBR MODIFIED SEQUENCING BATCH REACTOR

Waste Water Treatment Plant Overview and Tour

Outline. Municipal Wastewater Engineering. Advanced wastewater treatment. Advanced wastewater treatment. Advanced wastewater treatment

with sewage effluent Nutrient enrichment ( Eutrophication ) Algal Blooms Deaeration of the watercourse oxidation of ammonia a potable.

A Study on Sludge Reduction in Sewage using Microbial Catalysts

CIE4485 Wastewater Treatment

PUBLIC WORKS TECHNICAL BULLETIN SEPTEMBER 2001 BIOLOGICAL NUTRIENT REMOVAL

Future Directions In Wastewater Treatment

BASICS OF WASTEWATER TREATMENT

Study on Fish Processing Wastewater Treatment by Swim-bed and Stick-bed Processes

Enhancing activated sludge nitrification through seeding from a downstream nitrifying fixed-film reactor

TWO YEARS OF BIOLOGICAL PHOSPHORUS REMOVAL WITH AN ADVANCED MSBR SYSTEM AT THE SHENZHEN YANTIAN WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT

Kinetic optimization of the activated sludge denitrification process

EXPERIMENTAL DETERMINATION OF THE HETEROTROPH ANOXIC YIELD IN ANOXIC-AEROBIC ACTIVATED SLUDGE SYSTEMS TREATING MUNICIPAL WASTEWATER

A general Description of the IAWQ activated sludge model No.1

COMBI-TREAT IMPROVED SBR TECHNOLOGY. 2.1Process Diagram:

Model-based optimisation of the biological performance of a sidestream MBR

Probabilistic Modeling of Two-Stage Biological Nitrogen Removal Process: Formulation of Control Strategy for Enhanced Process Certainty

Presence And Effects Of Aromatic Hydrocarbons On Sewage Treatment Efficiency

ADVANCED CONTROL SYSTEM OF ACTIVATED SLUDGE PROCESSES USING IN- SITU AMMONIUM AND NITRATE PROBES

Supplemental Information for

Experimental determination of the heterotroph anoxic yield in anoxic-aerobic activated sludge systems treating municipal wastewater

General Information on Nitrogen

TREATMENT OF HOSPITAL WASTEWATER USING ACTIVATED SLUDGE COMBINED WITH BIOLOGICAL CONTACTOR

Design of horizontal and vertical subsurface flow constructed wetlands treating industrial wastewater

CTB3365x Introduction to Water Treatment

WASTEWATER TREATMENT

BIOLOGICAL PHOSPHOROUS REMOVAL AN OPERATOR S GUIDE

The role of biodegradable particulate and colloidal organic compounds in biological nutrient removal activated sludge systems

Optimizing Nutrient Removal. PNCWA - Southeast Idaho Operators Section Pocatello, ID February 11, 2016 Jim Goodley, P.E.

Study on nitrification and denitrification of high nitrogen and COD load wastewater in moving bed biofilm reactor

Overview of Supplemental Carbon Sources for Denitrification and Enhanced Biological Phosphorus Removal

Effect of Temperature on N 2 O and NO Emission in a Partial Nitrification SBR Treating Reject Wastewater

CSR Process Simulations Can Help Municipalities Meet Stringent Nutrient Removal Requirements

Secondary Treatment Process Control

QUESTIONNAIRE POND TREATMENT PLANT OLOID Agitate, Circulate, Aerate

Waste water treatment

Biological Phosphorus Removal

Biological nitrogen and phosphorus removal by filamentous bacteria in pure culture

Wastewater Nitrogen Characteristics, Treatment and Removal Options. Bob Smith, Orenco Systems, Inc. GEC 2013

WASTEWATER 101 Fo r MOWA

Module 11 : Water Quality And Estimation Of Organic Content. Lecture 14 : Water Quality And Estimation Of Organic Content

Factors Affecting Enhanced Biological Phosphorus Removal

Preparing for Nutrient Removal at Your Treatment Plant

A Roadmap for Smarter Nutrient Management in a Carbon and Energy Constrained World. Samuel Jeyanayagam, PhD, PE, BCEE

AN EXPERIMENTAL AND MATHEMATICAL SIMULATION OF BIOLOGICAL PROCESSES IN A SEWERAGE SYSTEM

AquaSBR. Sequencing Batch Reactor Process

Study of Kinetic coefficients of a Membrane Bioreactor (MBR) for municipal wastewater treatment

Energy Reduction and Nutrient Removal in WWTPs Using Feed- Forward Process Control

Wastewater Terms for Permit Applications

Provided by the author(s) and NUI Galway in accordance with publisher policies. Please cite the published version when available.

THE EFFECT OF REDUCTION OF AERATION PERIOD ON ORGANIC POLLUTANTS REMOVAL IN SEQUENCING BATCH ACTIVATED SLUDGE REACTORS

Module 17: The Activated Sludge Process - Part III Answer Key

HOW TO SELECT SRT. SRT is selected based on the following treatment requirements/objectives:

SWIM and Horizon 2020 Support Mechanism

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Volume 2, No 1, Copyright 2010 All rights reserved Integrated Publishing Association

Aerobic treatment of kitchen wastewater using sequence batch reactor (SBR) and reuse for irrigation landscape purposes.

Biological ammonia removal from drinking water in fluidized bed reactors

COMPARISON OF CHEMICAL AND BIOLOGICAL PHOSPHORUS REMOVAL IN WASTEWATER - A MODELLING APPROACH

SWIM and Horizon 2020 Support Mechanism

Domestic Waste Water (Sewage): Collection, Treatment & Disposal

Advances in Nitrogen and Phosphorus Removal at Low DO Conditions

Production of easily biodegradable carbon source for nutrient removal from wastewater through primary sludge hydrolysis - Impact on methane potential

PLANNING FOR NUTRIENT REMOVAL: WHAT STEPS CAN WE BE TAKING NOW?

MODELING OF BIOOLOGICAL PHOSPHORUS REMOVAL USING MEMBRANE BIOREACTOR: PART II

JTAC Presentation May 18, Nutrient Removal Process Fundamentals and Operation

Fundamental and practical studies on Enhanced Biological Phosphorus Removal (EBPR) Daniel R. Noguera

Biological Nutrient Removal Operations. December 9 th, 2015 Presenter Georgine Grissop PE, BCEE

Transcription:

Water Pollution IX 521 Effect of the start-up length on the biological nutrient removal process F. J. Fernández 1, J. Villaseñor 1 & L. Rodríguez 2 1 Department of Chemical Engineering, ITQUIMA, University of Castilla-La Mancha, Spain 2 Alquimia Soluciones Ambientales, Spain Abstract In this work, a study of the start-up stage of a Biological Phosphorus Removal (BPR) process was carried out. To do this, SBR alternating anaerobic and aerobic conditions were used with conventional activated sludge and fed with synthetic influent at the beginning of each cycle. During the length of the cycles (4 h) the most important parameters were determined. The main results obtained were that during the first days of the start-up stage the phosphorus removal percentage increased more quickly that those of the COD and ammonium-nitrogen. However, it was necessary to extend the start-up stage to at least 30 days in order to obtain the maximum phosphorus removal percentages and a stable Phosphorus Accumulating Organisms (PAO) population, whereas the maximum COD and ammonium-nitrogen removal percentages were obtained in about ten days. Once the start-up period had finished the ratio P released to COD stored was determined, obtaining a value of about 0.14, which is significantly lower than the theoretical value (0.55), suggesting the presence of a significant GAO population. Keywords: activated sludge, biological phosphorus removal, biological nitrogen removal, start-up stage. 1 Introduction Biological Nutrient Removal (BNR) processes are being widely used to remove nutrients, Nitrogen and Phosphorous, as well as organic compounds contained in doi:10.2495/wp080511

522 Water Pollution IX wastewater, due to the EU stringent Phosphorus and Nitrogen standards for treated wastewater discharged on sensitive areas (Table 1) and its low cost compared with Coagulation-Flocculation processes. Table 1: Phosphorus and Nitrogen limits in treated water (EU directive). Parameter Population Equivalent 10000 to 100000 Population Equivalent >100000 Minimum Reduction Total Phosphorus 2 (mg L -1 ) 1 (mg L -1 ) 80% Total Nitrogen 15 (mg L -1 ) 10 (mg L -1 ) 70% - 80% Phosphorous and Nitrogen compounds have been reported to be the limiting nutrient in eutrophication, for this reason the BNR processes have been extensively investigated. For the simultaneous removal of Nitrogen and Phosphorus from wastewater, the biological reactor must alternate between at least three environments, anaerobic, anoxic and aerobic. Under anaerobic conditions, Phosphorus Accumulating Organisms (PAO) readily take up biodegradable organic carbon substrates [1-4], and store them as Polyhydroxyalcanoate (PHA), the energy required for this anaerobic process is obtained from the hydrolysis of intracellular polyphosphates and the glycolysis of glycogen coupled to the release of orthophosphate to the liquid [5]. Under anoxic conditions, the denitrification of heterotrophs is the main reaction, where heterotroph microorganisms convert nitrate into atmospheric nitrogen, in this process nitrate is used as the oxidizing agent [6] (eqn (1)). A + NO A + 0,5N (1) red 3 ox 2 Finally under aerobic conditions, PAO use the PHA for generating energy for growth, glycogen synthesis, and phosphate uptake, where the PAO take up of phosphate is more than that released during the anaerobic phase. Another important reaction is the nitrification of ammonium nitrogen compounds into nitrites and eventually nitrites to nitrates [7] (eqns (2-3)). + + 2 NH + 3 O 2NO + 2H O+ 4H + H (2) 4 2 2 2 nitrosomonas 2NO + O 2NO + H (3) 2 2 3 nitrobacter Under aerobic conditions, the aerobic oxidation of organic compounds contained in wastewater also takes place, here symbolized by the average composition C 18 H 19 O 9 N, during growth of PAO and heterotrophs microorganisms [7] (eqn (4)). + C H O N + H + 17, 5O 18CO + 8H O + NH (4) 18 19 9 2 2 2 4 Usually, the start-up of the BPR processes are carried out by feeding the wastewater to the bioreactor of the Wastewater Treatment Plant (WWTP), previously inoculated with activated sludge, in a fed-batch mode. During this stage, all the exposed processes take place independently and it is very

Water Pollution IX 523 interesting to determine how the start-up takes place in order to evaluate how to proceed in the start-up stage of a full-scale WWTP. In this context, the aim of this work was to study the influence of the start-up stage of a BNR process paying special attention to the COD, Nitrogen and Phosphorus removal processes. 2 Material and methods 2.1 Inoculum Activated sludge from a conventional activated sludge full-scale WWTP was used as inoculum for the batch experiments. Before the start of the experiments, the activated sludge was aerated for five hours in order to ensure the complete consumption of all the substrates contained in the wastewater. 2.2 Synthetic wastewater The wastewater used for the cultivation of microorganisms was prepared daily and was a synthetic wastewater that simulated the characteristics of real urban sewage. The composition of the synthetic wastewater and its characteristics are shown in Table 2. Table 2: Wastewater composition and characteristics. Component Concentration Parameter Concentration Glucose 161.0 COD 320.0±15.0 Soybean Peptone 161.0 BOD 5 210.0±10.0 (NH 4 ) 2 SO 4 74.2 BOD u 250.0±15.0 KH 2 PO 4 44.5 Total Nitrogen 32.6±3.0 NaHCO 3 115.0 Organic Nitrogen 16.1±3.0 MgSO 4 7H 2 O 50.0 Total Phosphorus 10.1±0.7 CaCl 2 30.0 ph 7.2±0.1 (NH 4 ) 2 Fe(SO 4 ) 2 3.0 2.3 Batch experiments Three identical SBRs, with a reaction volume of 2.4 L per reactor, were used. The SBRs were operated continuously in cycles of 4 h. Each cycle consisted of several phases: influent addition (5 min), anoxic anaerobic reaction (75 min), aerobic reaction (135 min), waste sludge withdrawal (1 min), settling (20 min) and effluent withdrawal (5 min). The temperature and ph of each reactor were

524 Water Pollution IX constantly maintained at 20 C and 7.2, respectively, and dissolved oxygen during aerobic stages was set to saturation. The sludge retention time was reduced stepwise from 40 to 6.7 d. Further details concerning the SBR experimental set-up can be found in previous publications [8]. 2.4 Analytical methods Samples were taken and immediately filtered through a Millipore glass fibre filter (pore size 0.45 µm). Following this, filtration samples were analyzed for the following parameters: S COD, S PT and S N-NH4. In addition, XSS, VSS and X PT were determined in the activated sludge. All analyses of wastewater and activated sludge were performed in accordance with the methods described in the literature [9]. 3 Results and discussion 3.1 COD removal The COD removal from the wastewater was investigated during the start-up stage. The results indicate that, from the beginning of the start-up stage, the COD removal was always more or less the same, about 90%. The negligible effect of the start-up stage over the COD removal could be explained by taking into account that from the beginning there was a sufficient concentration of activated sludge, which consumed the COD mainly during the aerobic stage. Although the Nitrogen and Phosphorus removal processes were associated with COD removal, the amount of COD removed by these processes was negligible compared to the COD removed under aerobic conditions. Comparing the COD concentration in the effluent wastewater and the inert COD in the influent wastewater, it was concluded that most of the effluent COD corresponded to the inert fraction, which indicated that the process was very stable and achieved a very good COD removal efficiency [10]. 3.2 Nitrogen removal Figure 1 shows the influence of the start-up length on the nitrogen removal from the wastewater. In this Figure it can be seen that the increased length of the start-up stage favoured nitrogen removal. This could be explained due to acclimatisation of the activated sludge to the new environmental conditions and the growth of the microorganisms involved in the nitrification-denitrification processes. As can be seen in this Figure, in about 10 d, the maximum nitrogen removal was obtained. The maximum increase in the nitrogen removal percentage was about a 35% d -1. 3.3 Phosphorus removal The results obtained for phosphorus removal with the length of the start-up stage are presented in Figure 2.

Water Pollution IX 525 Figure 1: Ammonium nitrogen removal during the start-up stage. Figure 2: Phosphorus removal during the start-up stage. In this Figure, it was observed that, during the first days, the phosphorus concentration in the effluent was reduced quickly, which could be explained because of the increase of activated sludge concentration and the growth of the microorganism involved in the phosphorus removal mechanisms (mainly the PAO organisms). Once stationary phosphorus removal had been reached, about 15 days after the beginning of the experiment, the effluent concentration was about 1 mg L -1. At the beginning of the start-up stage, the maximum increase in the nitrogen removal percentage was about a 40% d -1.

526 Water Pollution IX In order to examine the biological phosphorus mechanisms in depth, the profiles of the COD and the phosphorus during batch cycles carried out at different moments of the start-up stage were determined. These data are presented in Figures 3 and 4. Figure 3: COD profiles during different batch cycles. Figure 4: Phosphorus profiles during different batch cycles. These results obtained for the COD profiles indicate that at the beginning of the operation almost no COD was accumulated during the anaerobic stage, which indicates the absence of microorganisms able to store substrates inside the cell. This situation is typical in activated sludge from pure aerobic processes. 10

Water Pollution IX 527 days later, a significant COD amount was stored under anaerobic conditions, but this storage was even increased after 30 days of operation. These observations indicate that the development of a culture containing a significant amount of organisms involved in the accumulation of substrates under anaerobic conditions is slower than that of the typical microorganisms present in the activated sludge. In order to correlate this information with the interesting parameter, the phosphorus removal, the phosphorus profile was also determined (Figure 4). First of all, this information was used to evaluate the evolution of the phosphorus release and storage. On this basis the phosphorus profile during the three cycles was correspondent to the observation made for the COD profile. That is, the higher the start-up length, the higher the phosphorus release under anaerobic conditions and therefore removal. However, the authors of this work considered it interesting to determine the P release to COD store ratio obtained under anaerobic conditions (Table 2). Table 3: Stoichiometry relationship [S PT released/s COD stored] for different start-up lengths. Start-up Length (d) [S PT released/s DQO stored] (mg S PT /mg S COD ) Under anaerobic conditions 0 0.08 10 0.10 31 0.14 This information was considered to be interesting because the higher the value, usually near 0.5 mg/mg, the higher PAO population on the activated sludge, which is the best situation. Moreover, low values of these ratios will supply very interesting information about the development of the microorganisms ability to store COD but not P, usually called Glycogen Accumulating Organisms (GAO) bacteria, which is undesirable in BNR reactors because of competition with the PAO bacteria for the available COD substrate. In our case the ratio presented a low value, which indicated the significant presence of GAO bacteria. 4 Conclusions The main conclusions of this study are shown below: The COD removal can be achieved without significant problems from the beginning of the start-up period. The biological nitrogen removal needs a period of acclimatisation of about 10 days to reach the best removal yields. The biological phosphorus removal is the most complicated process to be adequately initiated during the start-up stage, requiring at least 30 d to be reach the optimum removal yields

528 Water Pollution IX One of the most important inconveniences during the start-up stage of the phosphorus removal is the development of a bacterial population able to store COD under anaerobic conditions, but without the ability to store P under aerobic conditions. References [1] Abu-gararah, Z.H., & Randall C.W. The effect of organics compounds on biological phosphorus removal, Water Sci. Technol. 23, pp 585 594, 1991. [2] Smolders, G.J.F., Klop, J.M., van Loosdrecht, M.C.M. & Heijnen, J.J. A metabolic model of the biological phosphorous removal process: I. Effect of the sludge retention time. Biotechnology and Bioengineering. 48, pp 222 233, 1995. [3] Filipe, C.D.M., Daigger, G.T. & Grady, C.P.L. Stoichiometry and kinetics of acetate uptake under anaerobic conditions by an enriched culture of phosphorus-accumulating organisms at different phs. Biotechnology and Bioengineering. 76, pp 32 43, 2001. [4] Fernández, F.J. Villaseñor, J. & Rodríguez, L. Effect of the internal recycles on the phosphorus removal efficiency of a WWTP. Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Research, 56, pp 95 10, 2007. [5] Mino, T., Arun, V., Tsuzuki, Y. & Matsuo, T. Effect of phosphorous accumulation on acetate metabolisms in the biological phosphorous removal process. Proceedings of the IAWPRC International Conference on Biological Phosphate Removal from Wastewaters. Roma, Adv. Water Pollut. Cont., ed. R. Ramadori,. Pergamon Press, Oxford, pp 27 38 1987. [6] De Lucas, A., Rodríguez, L., Villaseñor, J. & Fernández, F.J., Denitrification potential of industrial wastewaters. Water Research, 39, pp 3715 3726, 2005. [7] Henze, M., Harremoës, P., LaCour Cansen, J. & Harbin, E. Wastewater Treatment: Biological and Chemical Processes. Springer, Heidelberg, 1995. [8] De Lucas, A., Rodríguez, L., Villaseñor, J., & Fernández, F.J. Biodegradation kinetics of stored wastewater substrates by a mixed microbial culture. Biochemical Engineering Journal, 26, pp 191 197, 2005. [9] A.P.H.A., A.W.W.A., W.P.C.F. Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater, 20ª edición. American Public Health Association / American Water Works Association / Water Environmental Federation, Washington, DC., United States of America, 1998. [10] De Lucas, A., Rodríguez, L., Villaseñor, J., & Fernández, F.J. Influence of industrial discharges on the performance and population of a biological nutrient removal process. Biochemical Engineering Journal, 34, pp 51 61, 2007.