DESIGN-BUILD PROCUREMENT AND ADMINISTRATION

Approved: Effective: April 15, 2015 Review: April 1, 2015 Office: Construction Topic No.: 625-020-010-l Department of Transportation 1.1 PURPOSE DESIGN-BUILD PROCUREMENT AND ADMINISTRATION SECTION 1 INTRODUCTION To establish the Department's process for procuring and administering Design-Build projects. 1.2 AUTHORITY Sections 20.23(3)(a) and 334.048(3), Florida Statutes (F.S.) 1.3 SCOPE This procedure affects all offices associated with the procurement and administration of Design-Build projects. 1.4 BACKGROUND Design-Build combines into a single contract the design and construction requirements for a project, in accordance with standard Florida Department of Transportation (Department) criteria (if applicable), specifications (if applicable), and contract administration practices. The Department is authorized under Section 337.11(7), F.S., to use the Design-Build process on buildings, major bridges, limited access facilities, and rail corridor projects. The Department s authority is further expanded under Section 337.025, F.S., to include all project types as a part of the innovative highway projects program. The Design-Build procurement and contract administration processes will follow standard Department practices, unless otherwise identified. Districts are responsible for

Page 2 of 58 conducting the Design-Build procurement and administration processes for projects within the managing District; whereas, Central Office Professional Services Unit, in coordination with the appropriate office(s), is responsible for Design-Build contracts originating in the Central Office. 1.5 REFERENCES Section 337.11(7), F.S., Design-Build Statute; Rule Chapter 14-22, Florida Administrative Code (F.A.C), Contractors-Highway-Qualification to Bid; Rule Chapter 14-91, F.A. C, Administration of Combined Design and Construction Contracts (Design- Build) Section 287.055, F.S., Consultants Competitive Negotiation Act; Rule Chapter 14-75, F.A. C. Consultants Qualification Section 337.025, F.S., Innovative Highway Projects Section 339.135(2), F.S., Work Program Legislative Budget Request 23 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 636, Design-Build Contracting FDOT Procedure Topic No. 375-000-001, Road and Bridge Contract Procurement FDOT Procedure Topic No. 375-030-002, Acquisition of Professional Services FDOT Procedure Topic No. 575-000-000, Right of Way Procedures Manual FDOT Procedure Topic No. 350-020-200, Contract Funds Management Funds Approval FDOT Design-Build Specifications Division I (General Requirements and Covenants) FDOT Standard Specifications for Road and Bridge Construction Division II (Construction Details), Division III (Materials), and Implemented Modifications.

Page 3 of 58 SECTION 2 DEFINITIONS For purposes of this procedure, the following definitions apply: Adjusted Score Design-Build (ASDB) means the contract award is based on the lowest adjusted score, which is determined by dividing the price proposal, with any adjustments for proposed contract time when identified in the Request for Proposal (RFP), by the sum of the Letter of Interest score and technical proposal score. Advertisement is the Departments solicitation for Design-Build services. Bid Proposal means the documents required by the public advertisement to include: Letters of Interest, a technical proposal, and/or a price proposal. Contracting Unit is the unit within each District that has been given the responsibility of procuring Design-Build contracts. This unit may mean either the Contracts Administration Office or the Professional Services Unit, whichever is appropriate for the task required. Contracts Administration Office is the District or Central office that is responsible for the contracts awards process. Consultant Construction Engineering and Inspection (CCEI): A consulting engineering firm pre-qualified by the Department to perform Construction Engineering and Inspection (CEI) and under contract to perform such services on a project or series of projects. Department CEI: The Department employees who perform construction engineering and inspection services. Design-Build means combining the design and construction phases of a project into a single contract. Design-Build Firm, means any company, firm, partnership, corporation, association, joint venture, Design-Build joint venture, or other legal entity authorized to practice engineering, architecture and construction contracting, as appropriate in the State of Florida. Design-Build Joint Venture: A Design-Build Joint Venture is created when a qualified bidder, or group of qualified bidders, and another entity enter into an agreement prior to bidding on Design-Build projects. A joint venture formed under Rule 14-22.007, F.A.C., and approved by the Department will qualify as a Design-Build Joint Venture for purposes of this procedure. Design-Build Major: As authorized by Section 337.11(7), F.S., is a contracting

Page 4 of 58 technique, which allows the Department to combine the design and construction phases of a building, a major bridge, a limited access facility, or a rail corridor project into a single contract. Design-Build Maximum Price: This method stipulates a maximum price. Design-Build Firms compete on project scope, qualifications, quality, innovation, schedule, and costs (not to exceed the maximum price). Every proposal has a stipulated price and the competition is on price, scope, quality, innovation, and schedule. This method has the advantage of immediately allowing the Department to determine if the required scope is realistically achievable within the limits of a tight budget. It is responsive to the efficient use of funds by committing virtually all available funding up front and using the scope, schedule, innovation, and quality of project proposals to determine the most attractive offer. Design-Build Minor: As authorized by the Innovative highway program statute (Section 337.025, F.S.), is a technique which allows road contracting projects and other types of construction projects that are not covered by Section 337.11(7), F.S., to be procured as a Design-Build project. Design-Build Pushbutton: A Design-Build method which establishes a defined scope of work to be completed by the Design-Build Firm and also includes establishing a price for pre-determined work items which may be completed by the Design-Build Firm pursuant to the Department s issuance of Task Work Orders. The original scope of work is approximate and represents estimated planned work requirements based on historical or specific project needs. Task Work Orders will identify the location, description and amount of work to be performed. Under Design-Build Pushbutton contracting, the Department does not guarantee any maximum quantity, minimum quantity or range of quantities of work to be performed. Design-Build Pushbutton contracts shall be ASDB procurements. Design-Build with Options: This process provides a method to build a project to a lesser scope versus not letting the project due to the bids coming in higher than what the Department can afford. The Department plans to construct the entire project as stipulated in the Contract Documents. However, the Department intends to establish priorities for the Contract award in the event the goals of the Department cannot be achieved with the funds determined available by the Department. If funding is a limitation on a project based on bids received, the Department can exercise options established for a project. Design and Construction Criteria Package: The design and construction requirements that define the criteria essential to ensure that the project is designed and constructed to meet the needs determined by the Department. This package is part of the RFP. Factored Design-Build means the contract award is based on the highest score received by comparing each proposer s price proposal to the lowest price proposal

Page 5 of 58 received and each proposers score for Letters of Interest and technical proposal to the highest score for the Letters of Interest and technical proposal received by the Department. The sum of the scores for the Letters of Interest and the technical proposal from each proposer will be divided by the highest sum of the scores for Letters of Interest and technical proposal from any proposer multiplied by a factor ranging from 15% to 30% as described in the public advertisement, including any adjustments for proposed contract time when idenitifed in the RFP. The lowest price proposal received will be divided by each price proposal submitted by any proposer to determine a value which will be multipled by a factor ranging from 70% to 85% as described in the public advertisement, including any adjustments for proposed contract time when identified in the RFP. In no case will the factors applied to the sum of the Letters of Interest plus technical proposal and to the price proposal be greater than 100%. The Factored Design-Build procurement process may be used by the Department to procure any Design-Build project. For the purpose of this procedure, Factored Design-Build is considered an Adjusted Design-Build procurement method. Fixed Capital Outlay (FCO) Building Projects provide for building additions, replacements, major repairs or renovations to materially extend the useful life or improve/change the functional use (including furniture and equipment) necessary to furnish a new or improved facility. Letter of Interest refers to the initial submittal required by the Department for the Phase I procurement process for ASDB projects. Criteria required for Letters of Interest is stated in the advertisement. Design-Build Firms desiring to submit Bid Proposals on ASDB projects must submit a Letter of Interest setting forth the qualifications of the members of the Design-Build Firm and provide any other information required by the project advertisement. Low Bid Design-Build (LBDB) means the contract award is based on a responsive technical proposal with the lowest price proposal. Non-complex project: means a Design-Build project in which plans have been substantially developed; is located in an unincorporated area or an incorporated area with a population of less than 200,000; does not involve complex Maintenance of Traffic schemes; and has limited options for innovation and specialized engineering. The procurement method for non-complex projects will be Low Bid Design-Build or Factored Design-Build. Non-FCO Building Project means a project to provide toll facilities, rest areas, weighin-motion facilities, Turnpike Service Plazas, welcome centers, and other buildings incidental to the roadway system. Non-Responsive refers to any Letters of Interest non-compliant with the criteria identified in the phase I process or any technical proposal non-compliant with the criteria defined in the RFP in the phase II process of the ASDB procurement. On LBDB procurement, this refers to any technical proposal non-compliant with the criteria

Page 6 of 58 defined in the RFP. Professional Services Unit is the District or Central office that includes the Department s staff responsible for proper procurement of professional services in the program area. Project means those services to be designed and constructed as described in the public announcement. Project Manager (PM) is the Department's designee responsible for the administration of the design-build project. Proposal Evaluators means the group of individuals serving as a Technical Review Committee assigned with the responsibility of evaluating and scoring the Letters of Interest and evaluating and scoring the technical proposals received on ASDB projects. On LBDB projects the Proposal Evaluators shall review technical proposals for the purpose of determining responsiveness. Rail Corridor Project means a project which involves design and construction of, improvements to, or replacement of tracks and track components such as rails, ties, turnouts, crossings, bridges, trestles, culverts, signals, communication lines, poles, radio masts, buildings, structures, facilities, and all other improvements or fixtures required for the operation of the railway. Request for Proposal (RFP) is the package to be provided to the short-listed Design- Build Firms in the ASDB method and to those Design-Build Firms pursuing LBDB projects. The RFP must define all functions and responsibilities required by the Design- Build Firm. This RFP should consist of the following: (A) (B) (C) Dates: Technical proposal due date; Department s selection schedule; delivery of services/products date; Department s submittal reviews (if required) time period; and payout schedule, as applicable. Design and Construction Criteria: The design and construction requirements define the specifications essential to ensure that the project is designed and constructed to meet the needs determined by the Department. Requirements for preparation and submittal of technical and price proposals. Responsive refers to any Letters of Interest compliant with the criteria identified in the phase I process or any technical proposal compliant with the criteria defined in the RFP in phase II of the ASDB procurement. On LBDB procurement, this refers to any technical proposal compliant with the design and construction criteria defined in the RFP. Selection Committee: On ASDB projects, the Committee which reviews and confirms the scored Letters of Interest of Design-Build Firms that may submit proposals. On ASBD projects, after the Proposal Evaluators evaluate and score the Letters of

Page 7 of 58 Interest and technical proposals, the Contracting Unit will submit their findings along with the bid price proposals and lowest adjusted scores to the Selection Committee. The Selection Committee may approve an award to the Design-Build Firm with the lowest adjusted score. On LBDB projects, the Selection Committee will approve an award to the Design-Build Firm with the lowest bid that submits a responsive technical proposal. In the District, as a minimum, the Selection Committee is comprised of the District Secretary (who will serve as Chairperson), the appropriate Director, and the appropriate Office Head or as appointed by the District Secretary. A representative from the Contracting Unit will be a non-voting member and will serve as Recording Secretary at all meetings. Each member of the Committee may appoint an appropriate management level alternate as appropriate. In the Central Office, the Selection Committee will be comprised of the appropriate Assistant Secretary or their designee (who will serve as Chairperson), the appropriate Director, and the appropriate Office Head or as appointed by the Chairperson. The Manager of the Procurement Office will be a non-voting member and will serve as Recording Secretary at all meetings. Each Committee member may appoint an appropriate management level alternate as appropriate. Short-list is defined as the responsive Design-Build Firms participating in phase II of an ASDB project. Technical Advisor is defined as the individual or group of project specific discipline expert(s) who may assist the Proposal Evaluators, as necessary, by reviewing Letters of Interest and technical proposals and providing factual information based on their discipline review. Value of Time Factor means an adjustment to the price proposal to reflect the worth of completing a project in as short a time as possible. This adjustment factor is based on the Design-Build Firm s proposed number of days to complete the project multiplied by a value per day established by the Department in the RFP, i.e., number of days multiplied by the dollar value per day equals the price proposal adjustment (increase). This factor will be used for selection purposes only and shall not affect the Department s liquidated damages schedule or affect any special provisions that apply for incentives/disincentives.

Page 8 of 58 SECTION 3 ADMINISTRATIVE RESPONSIBILITIES 3.1 ROLE OF THE DEPARTMENT'S PROJECT MANAGER (PM) The Department's Project Manager will be responsible for coordinating the procurement of Design-Build services as well as overseeing the engineering/inspection/construction of the project. A team approach, with a PM from Production and a PM from Operations, is a viable solution to fulfilling the responsibilities associated with this role. The responsibilities may include, but are not limited to: Working with Contracting Unit and other appropriate offices in establishing the pre-qualification categories and advertisement Coordinating with the Federal Highway Administration representative on oversight and exempt projects Participating in the Proposal Evaluators review of Letters of Interest submitted by responsive Design-Build Firms Participating in the development of the RFP Working with the Contracting Unit in responding to Design-Build Firm's inquiries Participating in the procurement meetings, Coordinating the Proposal Evaluators review of technical proposals Coordinating the submittal of technical evaluations to Selection Committee Acting as the Department's liaison with the Design-Build Firm during the construction of the project in general and as person in responsible charge of the project Coordinating the review of the Design-Build Firm's submittals by FDOT during design and construction Working with the assigned Right of Way Project Manager to ensure right of way services are provided as specified in the contract and in compliance with applicable state and federal requirements. Making periodic site reviews Reviewing and approving periodic progress payments Monitoring MBE/DBE participation Ensuring the Department receives final documents as specified in the contract Ensuring that proper CEI is performed during construction Ensuring Materials Acceptance Program requirements are met

Working with appropriate offices to develop supplemental agreements if applicable Ensuring that the Design-Build Firm's Quality Control (QC) plan is being followed Ensuring that all environmental commitments are followed Ensuring that appropriate documentation takes place at each step in the process Conducting performance evaluations 625-020-010-l Page 9 of 58 The PM must rely heavily on a multi-disciplined team in order to: (a) determine the prequalification requirements, (b) develop the design and construction criteria, (c) evaluate the Letters of Interest and technical proposals, and (d) oversee the design, construction, and CEI of the project and if applicable, right of way services provided on the project. The District Secretary or the District Directors should assign the appropriate people to serve on this team. Due to the complexity of coordinating a design-build project, the PM and members of the multi-disciplined FDOT team must work in concert to successfully complete all elements of the contracting and administrative process required by design-build projects.

SECTION 4 ADJUSTED SCORE DESIGN-BUILD (ASDB) PROCESS 625-020-010-l Page 10 of 58 The adjusted score approach may be used when overall outcomes can be clearly defined; however, a number of alternatives may exist which could provide the outcomes desired. An example of this method is a bridge project where alternative foundations, spans, and material types are acceptable. 4.1 PROJECT IDENTIFICATION 4.1.1 District and Central Office Management must first decide if contracting a specific project through the Design-Build method would benefit the Department and the Department s customers. Projects with a combined design and construction cost of less than $25M, Design-Build Pushbutton projects (regardless of the combined design and construction cost), Design-Build Maximum Price projects (regardless of the combined design and construction cost), and Factored Design-Build projects (regardless of the combined design and construction cost) require approval of the Chief Engineer prior to programming as Design-Build. The project will then be identified and included in the work program. Design-Build contracts will be identified in the Financial Management System (FM System) as Phase 52, Contract Class 9 for the fiscal year in which bids are to be received. For FCO projects, Design-Build contracts will be identified in the FM System in the fiscal year for which the appropriation is received. Phase 52 will include all work associated with preliminary engineering, and construction, and if applicable, right of way services provided on the project. In-house CEI estimates that will initially be automatically generated (based on the overall Phase 52 level) must be manually revised to represent only the in-house effort required to manage the CEI consultant. District Program Development staff will code the Item Group as A3 (Design-Build Minor) or B8 (Design-Build Major) based on project description and authorization. 4.1.2 If incentives are used on a Design-Build project, the appropriate Item Group Code will be used in the FM System. The incentive payment should be programmed in the fiscal year in which the incentive payment is expected to be made. Expected payout will occur when the Contractor has met the early completion dates/days noted in the contract. Use Phase 5A to program these payments and the same program number as on the construction Phase 52 (02, 05, etc.). 4.2 DEVELOPMENT OF PRE-QUALIFICATION REQUIREMENTS 4.2.1 The Project Manager, with the assistance of a multi-disciplined team including the Contracting Unit, will determine the pre-qualification requirements. The Department s standard technical qualification requirements apply to each entity providing professional services (Rule Chapter 14-75, F.A.C.). Pre-qualification is required for contractors performing specialty work, as described in FDOT Standard Specifications. Pre-qualification is required prior to the closing date for the submittal of Letters of Interest.

Page 11 of 58 Pre-qualification requirements for Design-Build advertisements for the contractor and design consultant members of the Design-Build Firm must be in accordance with the following: 1) Contractors submitting as a lead or prime with the Design-Build Firm must be qualified in all advertised construction contractor work classes, in accordance with the provisions of Rule Chapter 14-22, F.A.C. In this case, where the design consultant is not the lead of the Design-Build Firm, the design consultant will be utilized to meet the advertised Professional Services Work Type requirements, in accordance with provisions of Rule Chapter 14-75, F.A.C. The design consultant may utilize subconsultants to meet the advertised Professional Services Work Type requirements. (2) Design consultants submitting as lead or prime with the Design-Build Firm may utilize subcontractors to meet all advertised construction contractor work class requirements, in accordance with the provisions of Rule Chapter 14-22, F.A.C. The design consultant may utilize subconsultants to meet the advertised Professional Services Work Type requirements, in accordance with provisions of Rule Chapter 14-75, F.A.C. (3) When a joint venture party submits Letters of Interest, one of the contractor members of the joint venture party must be assigned to meet the advertised construction contractor work class requirements, in accordance with the provisions of Rule Chapter 14-22, F.A.C. In this case, the design consultants member of the Design-Build Firm will be utilized to meet the advertised Professional Services Work Type requirements, in accordance with provisions of Rule Chapter 14-75, F.A.C. 4.2.2 FCO building pre-qualification requirements for contractors include the following: Applicable Contractor License, State Corporate Charter Number, if Corporation, and Added requirements, if necessary for specialized needs. 4.3 DEVELOPMENT OF REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL 4.3.1 The Department shall develop an RFP which furnishes sufficient information for Design-Build Firms to prepare proposals. The RFP will set forth the submittal requirements and evaluation criteria. Development of the RFP for a design-build project shall be undertaken by individuals knowledgeable of the contracting requirements and experienced in the application of the performance criteria appropriate to meet the facility needs. 4.3.2 The Districts shall use the approved boilerplate RFP document as shown on the State Construction Office web page as the basis for the project specific RFP document. An electronic copy of the draft RFP, with changes identified, shall be submitted to the State Construction Office on all projects for review and approval prior to posting of the project advertisement. An electronic copy of the final RFP, with changes identified,

Page 12 of 58 shall be submitted to the State Construction Office on all projects for review and approval prior to submittal to the short-listed Design-Build Firms. The intent of the State Construction Office s review is to assure these documents are in general conformance with the commitments made to FHWA and the Industry and to coordinate any suggested changes with FHWA and the Industry. For Category 2 bridge projects, the State Structures Design Engineer or designee should review and approve the draft and final versions of the RFP. Category 2 bridges are defined in the Plans Preparation Manual, Volume I, Topic No. 625 000 007, Section 26.3.2. 4.3.3 If the project is subject to FHWA oversight, the draft RFP shall be submitted for FHWA approval as soon as possible but no later than concurrent with the advertisement. It is critical that FHWA be involved throughout the development of the RFP in order to expedite FHWA s final RFP approval. Prior to sending the final RFP to short-listed Design-Build Firms, the Department must have FHWA approval of the RFP on oversight projects. 4.3.4 The RFP should identify design-build requirements/services, including any information, data, and services to be furnished by the Department. Rail projects that have Federal Transit Authority (FTA) oversight must submit a management plan. 4.3.5 The RFP shall provide a summary of the project s objectives and furnish sufficient information upon which Design-Build Firms may prepare Bid Proposals. Criteria may include geo-technical analysis, surveying, permitting, right of way mapping, title searches, utility coordination, etc. The RFP shall state the specifications, design criteria, and standards to be used in the design and construction of the project, and if applicable, standards, to be used in providing right of way services on the project, unless otherwise noted in the RFP. 4.3.6 The Design-Build Firm is subject to the Independent Assurance (IA) procedures. The Department's IA procedure will be used for comparison tolerances and actions. IA will be performed on Quality Control and Quality Assurance personnel. 4.4 CONTRACT NUMBER ASSIGNMENT The Contracting Unit will obtain a contract number and enter the project into the Department s data system for monitoring. 4.5 ENCUMBRANCE 4.5.1 The contracting Unit or Project Manager will request and receive approval of a MEMO Funds Encumbrance through the Contract Funds Management (CFM) system before the current advertisement is posted. 4.5.2 Prior to awarding the contract to the vendor, the Contracting Unit or Project Manager will request and receive approval of the award encumbrance through the Contract Funds Management system.

Page 13 of 58 4.6 ADVERTISEMENT 4.6.1 The proposed planned advertisement shall be submitted to the State Construction Office Alternative Contracting Specialist and the Central Office Procurement Manager for review and approval. Central Office review and approval of the planned advertisement language shall be obtained prior to the solicitation being posted on the planned projects advertisement website. The solicitation shall be posted on the planned projects advertisement website for a minimum of ten (10) calendar days prior to the solicitation being posted on the current projects advertisement website. Any deviation from the timeframes established for planned project advertisements shall be approved by the Chief Engineer. The planned advertisement will include, as a minimum, the name and description of the project, the District and County location of the project, the professional services work type requirements, construction work class requirements, the estimated construction cost of the project (if applicable), and the names of the approved Proposal Evaluators. 4.6.2 The proposed current advertisement shall be submitted to the State Construction Office Alternative Contracting Specialist and the Central Office Procurement Manager for review and approval before posting the solicitation on the current projects advertisement website. The solicitation shall be posted on the current project advertisement website for a minimum of twenty-one (21) calendar days from the date of current advertisement to the receipt of Letters of Interest. A minimum of 60 days is allowed from the date of advertisement to the receipt of technical proposals. Any deviation from timeframes related to current project advertisements shall be approved by the Chief Engineer. Advertisements will be publicized on the Internet web site at http://www2.dot.state.fl.us/procurement/ads/advdbld.htm. Additionally, the Department may utilize other forms of communication, such as newspapers or magazines, mail-outs, or television or radio to announce the project. The current advertisement shall include the Draft RFP document. The current advertisement will include, as a minimum, the name and description of the project, the District and County location of the project, the professional services work type requirements, construction work class requirements, the estimated construction cost of the project (if applicable), how and where Design-Build Firms can respond, any additional technical qualifications desired, the criteria on which Letters of Interest will be evaluated, the time frames for submitting Letters of Interest, technical proposals and price proposals, the number of copies to be received, how respondents will be selected,

Page 14 of 58 and tentative dates for Short-list and final selection. 4.6.3 All advertisements should summarize the Department s selection schedule for the prospective Design-Build Firms. The selection schedule should provide an outline of specific calendar dates and identify the time allotted for the preparation of qualification statements for proposals. Advertisements should also include the posting date and bid solicitation protest rights. Each project advertisement should be drafted to fit the unique needs of that particular project. 4.6.4 The advertisement shall include date, time, and location of when the Selection Committee announces the short-listing of Design-Build Firms (if applicable), announcement of technical scores (if applicable) and opening of price proposals. 4.6.5 Consultant Construction Engineering and Inspection Services contracts procured to provide administrative oversight of Adjusted Score Design-Build projects shall be advertised after the Short-list of Design-Build Firms has been developed. Prior approval from the Chief Engineer shall be obtained, should the District elect to deviate from this process. 4.7 LETTERS OF INTEREST On Adjusted Score Design-Build (ASDB) projects, Letters of Interest will be required from interested Design-Build Firms. Letters of Interest should be sent to the Contracting Unit. The Department is required to receive at least three (3) Letters of Interest in order to proceed with the procurement. If three (3) Letters of Interest are not received, then the Department will re-advertise, or alternatively review its list of pre-qualified Firms deemed to be the most highly qualified, based on qualification data on file, past performance grades, and location. The Department will then contact each of the listed Firms and conduct similar discussion concerning the project. Letters of Interest shall be no more than ten (10) pages in length and include a Contact Person, with name, phone number, and e-mail address (if available). Buildings, rail, or complex projects may require longer Letters of Interest. The Letters of Interest will be evaluated based on the required criteria stated in the advertisement. It is the Departments intent that the Design-Build Firms Letters of Interest should be based on the information contained in the draft RFP and other project documents provided with the current project advertisement and the Design-Build Firms knowledge of the project. The Letters of Interest should provide a broad overview of a Design-Build Firms understanding of the project requirements, identification of critical issues, and outline for addressing critical issues. 4.8 ASSIGNMENT OF AND EVALUATION AND SCORING BY PROPOSAL EVALUATORS The Project Manager, District Construction Engineer, District Design Engineer, or their

Page 15 of 58 designees, and others as agreed upon by the preceding identified members, or as appointed by the District Secretary or his or her representative shall serve as Proposal Evaluators. There shall be a minimum of three Proposal Evaluators on each Technical Review Committee. For projects which include Contractor prequalification requirements of Minor Bridge, the District Structures Design Engineer, or their designee shall serve as a Proposal Evaluator. For projects which include Contractor prequalification requirements of Major Bridge, the State Structures Design Engineer, or their designee shall serve as a Proposal Evaluator. For rail corridor projects, the Public Transportation Manager, or District Rail Corridor Manager, and the State Rail Office or their designee shall serve as a Proposal Evaluator. For building projects requiring major renovations, additions, or new facilities, which are intended for general public access, an architect (District, Central Office, or General Consultant), as well as appropriate Directors, or designees, based on the nature of the work requested, the complexity of the project, and the availability of personnel for a timely selection shall serve as Proposal Evaluators. For FCO buildings the District/ Central Office FCO Coordinator, or their designee shall serve as a Proposal Evaluator. Proposal Evaluators shall complete the Department s Proposal Evaluator training which can be accessed from the Office of Construction intranet website. Consultants may not serve as Proposal Evaluators. Participation by employees of other Florida governmental entities as a Proposal Evaluator is acceptable, as long as the Department participants represent a majority of the Technical Review Committee. Private citizens and members of special interest groups are not allowed to serve as Proposal Evaluators. Proposal Evaluators assigned to the Technical Review Committee must have sufficient experience in at least one of the engineering disciplines required by the project. Assignment of Proposal Evaluators to the Technical Review Committee for a specific project requires approval of the District Director of Transportation Operations and the District Director of Transportation Development. The Department reserves the discretion to substitute Proposal Evaluators as necessary throughout the procurement process. Substitutions shall be submitted to the District Director of Transportation Operations and the District Director of Transportation Development for review and approval. All Department staff serving as Proposal Evaluators must sign the Conflict of Interest Certification Form, Form No. 375 030 50, for each procurement. Employees of other

Page 16 of 58 Florida governmental entities serving as a Proposal Evaluator shall sign the Conflict of Interest Form for Public Officers/Employees, Form No. 375 030 50, for each procurement. The Contracting Unit representative shall complete the Conflict of Interest Form for Public Officers/Employees, Form No. 375 030 50, for each procurement. The Proposal Evaluators shall evaluate and score the Letters of Interest received from responsive Design-Build Firms. The Contracting Unit will evaluate the prequalifications of the construction contractor(s) and design consultant members of the Design-Build Firm, and the capacity of the construction contractors who are members of the Design-Build Firm. Pre-qualifications and capacity are to be assessed by the Contracting Unit. Prior to making a determination that any Design-Build Firm submitting a Letters of Interest is non-responsive on the basis of prequalification or capacity, the Contracting Unit shall contact the Prequalification Specialist of the State Construction Office. The appropriate Contracting Unit will provide the Proposal Evaluators with a copy of all Letters of Interest, and information to be used for evaluation purposes. Based upon this information, the Proposal Evaluators will evaluate and score all responsive Design-Build Firms submitting Letters of Interest to be considered. The Proposal Evaluators shall review the project documents to gain an appreciable knowledge of the project prior to evaluating the Letters of Interest. In scoring the Letters of Interest, each Proposal Evaluator shall provide written comments explaining the basis of their scores. The evaluation criteria apply to construction contractor(s) and design consultant members of the Design-Build Firm, and Right of Way professionals, when applicable. The Proposal Evaluators should take into consideration the following criteria as it applies to the project. (1) Design-Build Firm name and prequalifications (2) Past Performance Evaluations, Design-Build Project Experience, Organization and Staffing: Contractor Grades Professional Consultant Grades Performance History with other States or Agencies, if none with the Department. Design-Build Project Experience of the Contractor and Professional Consultant Similar type of work experience Environmental Record Contractor Experience Modification Rating (Current Year) Design-Build Firm organization Design-Build Firm staffing plan

Page 17 of 58 Design-Build Firm coordination plan (3) Design-Build Project Requirements and Critical Issues: Understanding of Design-Build Project requirements Identification of critical issues Outline for addressing critical issues Proposal Evaluator meetings to discuss strengths and weaknesses of Design Build Firms shall not be held. In lieu of Proposal Evaluator meetings, the District Contracting Unit may schedule Technical Advisor Presentation meetings. 4.9 REVIEW AND CONFIRMATION BY SELECTION COMMITTEE AND SHORT-LIST DEVELOPMENT 4.9.1 Evaluations and scores of Letters of Interest will be developed for each responsive Design-Build Firm. This information will be compiled and presented to each Selection Committee member for their review prior to or at the scheduled Selection Committee meeting. At the minimum, a quorum of the Proposal Evaluators shall be in attendance at the Selection Committee meeting, to confirm the Letters of Interest evaluations and scoring. A Proposal Evaluator may attend the Selection Committee meeting by phone when travel or other circumstances prevent in-person attendance. The Contracting Unit representative provides the Proposal Evaluators individual Letters of Interest Scores and written comments to the Selection Committee members for their review prior to the Selection Committee meeting. Individual Selection Committee members may contact the Project Manager or individual Proposal Evaluators in advance of the Selection Committee meeting if they have questions about the Proposal Evaluator comments. 4.9.2 The Selection Committee will review and confirm the evaluations and scores of all responsive Design-Build Firms submitting Letters of Interest as part of the procurement process during a publicly held meeting. If the Project Selection Committee discovers potential errors or omissions in the evaluation(s) of one or more Proposal Evaluators that are not resolved through questioning of the Proposal Evaluators during the public meeting, the Project Selection Committee may return the submissions to the Technical Review Committee for further review and reevaluation, as necessary. 4.9.3 The Contracting Unit will document the outcome of the Selection Committee meeting. The Contracting Unit will complete Form 375-030-2B, Design-Build Selection Package, which will become part of the permanent project file. Following the Selection Committee meeting, the Contracting Unit will provide a notification to all responsive Design-Build Firms which includes the Letters of Interest scores of each responsive Design-Build Firm as developed by the Proposal Evaluators and reviewed and confirmed by the Selection Committee. NOTE: Consultant Construction Engineering and Inspection Services contracts procured to provide administrative oversight of Adjusted Score Design-Build projects shall be advertised after the Short-list of Design-Build

Page 18 of 58 Firms has been developed.. Prior approval from the Chief Engineer shall be obtained, should the District elect to deviate from this process. 4.9.4 The responsive Design-Build Firms may elect to continue to participate in phase II of the procurement process by submitting notification to the procuring agent of its intent. Notification shall be provided by the deadline established in the advertisement. The Short-list will be made up of all responsive Design-Build Firms satisfying the election and notification requirements identified in the advertisement. The Short-list will be posted to the Departments website, following the notification deadline. 4.9.10 The public advertisement will state project specific short-listing criteria pursuant to one of the following methodologies: (a) After completing evaluations of the Letters of Interest, the Department will notify the Design-Build Firms of the evaluation and its scoring. Design-Build Firms providing written affirmation of its intent to proceed to the technical proposal phase of the procurement within the time provided in the Department s notification will be short-listed and be eligible to submit technical and price proposals, as is described above; or (b) The Department will determine the Short-list of Design-Build Firms. 4.10 COMPENSATION TO SHORT-LISTED DESIGN-BUILD FIRMS 4.10.1 For Adjusted Score Design-Build projects, unless prior approval is obtained from the Chief Engineer to exclude Stipend payment, the Department intends to contract directly with each shortlisted Design-Build Firm for preparation of a responsive technical and price proposal in response to the Design-Build RFP. All districts should use the referenced Design-Build Stipend Agreement, Form No. 700-011-14 between FDOT and the Design-Build Firm. Where the Department intends to reimburse Design-Build Firms for submitting a responsive proposal, the Department must enter into the Design-Build Stipend Agreement, Form No. 700-011-14 (Contract TypeE9) directly with each shortlisted Design-Build Firm immediately after short listing. The two non-selected shortlisted Design-Build Firms with the highest Letter of Interest score submitting a responsive proposal will ultimately be compensated. If two or more non-selected shortlisted Design-Build Firms have the second highest Letter of Interest scores then the non-selected shortlisted Design-Build Firm with the highest Letter of Interest score and the non-selected shortlisted Design- Build Firms with the second highest Letter of Interest score will be compensated. An agreement is required to document the terms and conditions of compensation. The intent is to compensate the amount that is noted in the RFP package. The amount is not intended to compensate the Design-Build Firms for the total cost of preparing the bid package. Each district should create sequences under the phase 32. Each sequence will be

Page 19 of 58 programmed for the agreement amount. The funds should be encumbered under each of the sequences. This is due to the fact that the Department has a contract with each non-selected short-listed Design-Build Firm. Therefore, all have to be programmed and encumbered prior to execution. The agreements will be executed with all short-listed Design-Build Firms. The two non-selected short-listed Design-Build Firms with the highest Letter of Interest score are to submit an invoice for payment of services on a Lump Sum basis after the selection/award process is complete. If two or more nonselected short-listed Design-Build Firms have the second highest Letter of Interest scores then the non-selected short-listed Design-Build Firm with the highest Letter of Interest score and the non-selected short-listed Design-Build Firms with the second highest Letter of Interest score are to submit an invoice for payment of services on a Lump Sum basis after the selection/award process is complete. The invoice should include the following statement: All work necessary to prepare technical and price proposals in response to the Department s RFP for the subject project. Compensation is intended to be on a pass/fail basis (i.e., responsive or non-responsive). If a proposal is deemed to be non-responsive, then no compensation shall be made. GUIDELINES FOR ESTIMATING PROPOSAL COMPENSATION AMOUNTS FOR DESIGN-BUILD PROJECTS Estimated Contract Value Stipend Amount (ECV) First $5M $25,000 Next $15M 0.0035 x ECV Next $30M 0.0025 x ECV Next $200M 0.0020 x ECV > $250M 0.0018 x ECV EXAMPLE 1 - A $4M project would have a stipend amount of $25,000. EXAMPLE 2 - A $12M project would have a stipend amount of $49,500 [(First $5M = $25,000) + (Next $7M * 0.0035 = $24,500)]. EXAMPLE 3 - An $85M project would have a stipend amount of $222,500 [(First $5M = $25,000) + (Next $15M * 0.0035 = $52,500) + (Next $30M * 0.0025 = $75,000) = (Next $35M * 0.0020 = $70,000)]. EXAMPLE 4 - A $175M project would have a stipend amount of $402,500 [(First $5M = $25,000) + (Next $15M * 0.0035 = $52,500) + (Next $30M * 0.0025 = $75,000) + (Next $125M * 0.0020 = $250,000)]. EXAMPLE 5 - A $225M project would have a stipend amount of $502,500 [(First $5M = $25,000) + (Next $15M * 0.0035 = $52,500) + (Next $30M * 0.0025 = $75,000) + (Next $175M * 0.0020 = $350,000)].

Page 20 of 58 EXAMPLE 6 - A $475M project would have a stipend amount of $957,500 [(First $5M = $25,000) + (Next $15M * 0.0035 = $52,500) + (Next $30M * 0.0025 = $75,000) + (Next $200M * 0.0020 = $400,000) + (Next $225M * 0.0018 = $405,000)]. 4.10.3 The amount of the stipend compensation will be based upon the estimated proposal development costs and the degree of engineering design required during the procurement process. The actual compensation in the above examples could vary based on the nature of the work, complexity of the Design-Build project, technical expertise required, and the value of the work product to the Department. This decision will be at the discretion of the contracting District or Central Office. The amount and conditions of the compensation must be included in the Department s advertisement. Federal funds may be used to compensate the short-listed Design-Build Firms. 4.11 PREPARATION OF REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS (RFP) If the project is subject to FHWA oversight, the RFP shall be submitted to and approved by FHWA prior to authorization and release of the RFP to the short-listed Design-Build Firms. 4.11.1 Project Time/Schedule All RFPs shall state a time period in which the services and/or products are to be delivered. Time of performance requirements in the RFP are best stated in elapsed consecutive calendar days from the date identified in the notice-to-proceed. In this way, changes in the schedule to solicit, receive, evaluate, and select an award can be changed without affecting the project schedule. In those instances where the completion date is critical, the RFP must include a "but-not-later-than" qualifier in the project schedule. An outline of the selection schedule should be included in the RFP. The Department's selection schedule is the schedule of the entire selection process and should include all activities from initial advertisement to notice to proceed. The schedule should be stated in specific calendar dates and it should identify the time allotted for the preparation of design-build technical proposals. 4.11.1.2 The Design-Build Firm's project schedule should depict at what stage in the design-build process the Design-Build Firm intends to build each element/phase of the project. The Design-Build Firm's project schedule shall be developed using critical path method (CPM) techniques (or other appropriate scheduling techniques based on the type of project) and specify the time frame for interim events. These events may include submittal requirements of the Design- Build Firm, such as design development drawings or construction documents. They may also include requirements of the Department directly or through a third party, e.g., site availability, completion of an environmental report/permits or the delivery of Department-furnished equipment or materials.

Page 21 of 58 4.11.1.3 The interim deadline requirements should be stated in elapsed days and may be an obligation of the Design-Build Firm or Department. The obligation of the Department to complete specific submittal reviews (if required) within a specified time period may also be included in the project schedule. 4.11.1.4 The RFP should identify the timeframes for Department review of required submittals. 4.11.1.5 It may be appropriate to allow certain construction activities (such as geotechnical investigations and clearing and grubbing) during this plans preparation period. Specifics should be included in the RFP. 4.11.2 Payout Schedule The RFP must address the invoicing and payment process including a payout schedule. The payout schedule should be based on major, well-defined tasks related to the Design-Build Firm's CPM (or other appropriate) schedule. The payout schedule should also include provisions for tracking MBE/DBE participation. Generally, the details of the payout schedule are to be developed between the selected Design-Build Firm and the Department after the project is awarded. Examples of payout schedules are based on monthly or percentage of completion of work schedules. For FCO building projects, the schedule of values will be used as a payout schedule. 4.11.3 Technical Proposal The RFP shall include well-defined technical proposal requirements. This should include detailed instructions regarding the content and format. A technical proposal shall include the information requested in response to the RFP. 4.11.4 Price Proposal The RFP shall include well-defined price proposal requirements. Design-build projects are bid lump sum and are paid through a payout schedule based on major work items or tasks. A price proposal shall include one lump sum for all costs of the Design-Build Project as defined by the RFP requirements.the Design-Build Firm's price proposal shall include the lump sum price as well as the standard bid blank forms. The Department shall determine whether to either make progress payments based on: a) work accomplished during a specified period of time (i.e., monthly), b) specific tasks completed, c) or both. 4.11.5 Partners/Teaming Arrangement Partners/Teaming Arrangements of the Design-Build Firm (i.e., contractor or designer or right of way consultant, if applicable) cannot be changed after submittal of the Letters of Interest on ASDB projects without written consent of the Chief