Oil & Gas Law. Class 4: RoC: Regulatory Responses (1 of 4) Intro & Well Spacing / Density

Similar documents
RAILROAD COMMISSION OF TEXAS OIL & GAS DIVISION

RAILROAD COMMISSION OF TEXAS OIL & GAS DIVISION

RAILROAD COMMISSION OF TEXAS OIL & GAS DIVISION

RAILROAD COMMISSION OF TEXAS OIL & GAS DIVISION

RAILROAD COMMISSION OF TEXAS OIL & GAS DIVISION

RAILROAD COMMISSION OF TEXAS OIL & GAS DIVISION

RAILROAD COMMISSION OF TEXAS OIL & GAS DIVISION

RAILROAD COMMISSION OF TEXAS OIL & GAS DIVISION

RAILROAD COMMISSION OF TEXAS OIL & GAS DIVISION

RAILROAD COMMISSION OF TEXAS OIL & GAS DIVISION

RAILROAD COMMISSION OF TEXAS OIL & GAS DIVISION

RAILROAD COMMISSION OF TEXAS OIL & GAS DIVISION

RAILROAD COMMISSION OF TEXAS OIL & GAS DIVISION

RAILROAD COMMISSION OF TEXAS OIL & GAS DIVISION

RAILROAD COMMISSION OF TEXAS OIL & GAS DIVISION

Railroad Commission. Class II Underground Injection Control Program Aquifer Exemption Project. February 12, 2018

December 22, 2008 OIL & GAS DOCKET NO

Texas Railroad Commission

Best Petroleum Explorations, Inc. M. Brad and Sandra Dixon Themselves PROCEDURAL HISTORY

July 19, HEARD BY: Thomas H. Richter, P.E., Technical Examiner, Legal Division Colin Lineberry, Hearings Examiner, Legal Division

RAILROAD COMMISSION OF TEXAS OIL & GAS DIVISION

PROCEDURAL HISTORY EXAMINERS REPORT AND PROPOSAL FOR DECISION STATEMENT OF THE CASE

RAILROAD COMMISSION OF TEXAS DRILLING PERMIT MASTER PLUS LATITUDES AND LONGITUDES MAGNETIC TAPE USER'S GUIDE

**************************************************** * KEY ISSUES: WASTE/CONFISCATION * * Recoverable reserves estimate *

PROCEDURAL HISTORY EXAMINERS REPORT AND PROPOSAL FOR DECISION STATEMENT OF THE CASE

Railroad Commission of Texas. Chairman Elizabeth Ames Jones Commissioner David Porter Barry T. Smitherman

RAILROAD COMMISSION OF TEXAS OIL & GAS DIVISION. Horizontal

* FINAL ORDER: RULE 37 EXCEPTION DENIED * *****************************************************

CHAPTER I INTRODUCTION TO WYOMING WATER ADMINISTRATION

Administrative Law and Oil & Gas Operations

L.C.S. Production Company. AAH Fidelity, LLC and Sam Henshaw PROCEDURAL HISTORY

August 24, 2000 OIL & GAS DOCKET NO

EXAMINERS' REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION STATEMENT OF THE CASE

APPLICATION OF TEX-LEE OPERATING CO. FOR AN EXCEPTION TO STATEWIDE RULE 37 TO DRILL WELL NO.

IN THE STATE OIL AND GAS BOARD OF MISSISSIPPI. RE: PETITION OF COMSTOCK OIL & GAS, a po 7 g?nnq LP TO AMEND THE SPECIAL FIELD ' * cw* ORDER

Application for Gas Exploration and Production

DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY OIL, GAS, AND MINERALS DIVISION OIL AND GAS OPERATIONS. Filed with the Secretary of State on

IN THE STATE OIL AND GAS BOARD OF MISSISSIPPI ORDER. This matter came on for hearing before the State Oil and Gas Board of Mississippi

July 26, 2000 APPLICATION OF HENRY PETROLEUM CORPORATION TO CONSIDER PERMANENT FIELD RULES FOR THE HOMANN (SAN ANDRES) FIELD, GAINES COUNTY, TEXAS

H. Philip Whitworth O Ryan Oil and Gas Robert Green Jason D. Bailey

Valence Operating Company

EXAMINER S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION STATEMENT OF THE CASE

Newfield Exploration Company

U.S. HRW Wheat Crop Update

- Geothermal Energy -

Water and Energy in Wyoming: Using Wyoming s Temporary Use Statute W.S

BACKGROUND INFORMATION ON GAS WELL PERMITS GW10-2_GW10-3

January 9, Representing Devon Energy Production Company EXAMINER S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION STATEMENT OF THE CASE

Substate Federalism and Fracking Policies: Does State Regulatory Authority Trump Local Land Use Autonomy?

DIVISION 7. WATER QUALITY [ ] (Division 7 repealed and added by Stats. 1969, Ch. 482.)

Appearances Representing Philip Whitworth Stroud Petroleum, Inc. Scott D. Stroud EXAMINER S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION STATEMENT OF THE CASE

Headwaters Underground Water Conservation. District Hill Country Priority Groundwater Management Area

RULES OF THE OIL AND GAS PROGRAM DIVISION OF WATER RESOURCES CHAPTER DEFINITIONS TABLE OF CONTENTS

RULES FOR OAK RIDGE FIELD, WARREN AUG COUNTY, MISSISSIPPI, AND TO OBTAIN RELATED

SENATE, No STATE OF NEW JERSEY. 210th LEGISLATURE INTRODUCED MAY 13, 2002

Oil and Gas Fast Facts and Frequently Asked Questions February 19, 2013

OIL AND GAS DOCKET NO

Water Sourcing and Recycling in Oil & Gas Operations. Michael Sims, P.E. Technical Permitting, Oil &Gas Division Main Line:

FOR WORKSHOP ON GEOTHERMAL ENERGY. Hawaii State Senate. Committee on Economic Development, Energy and Natural Resources.

RAILROAD COMMISSION OF TEXAS. Barry T. Smitherman, Chairman David Porter, Commissioner Buddy Garcia, Commissioner

Bureau of Land Management Oil and Gas Program

Protestants: Holmes Exploration, LLC and Red Willow

Dean Couch Attorney at Law

RAILROAD COMMISSION OF TEXAS

IDEM Update. ACEC Indiana Environmental Business and Funding Conference September 15, 2016 The Willows, Indianapolis

STATEWIDE MUTUAL AID AGREEMENT AN ACT. relating to resource sharing among certain political subdivisions,

PROCEDURAL HISTORY EXAMINERS REPORT AND PROPOSAL FOR DECISION STATEMENT OF THE CASE

Exaro requests that the following rules be amended for the Lyda (Vicksburg Lower) Field:

Regulation of In Situ Mining in Texas

Geothermal Law in Texas

Analysis of potential pipeline infrastructure, transportation & IOGCC/SSEB PTTF REPORT

Underground Natural Gas Storage: Facts & Figures

Oil and Gas Incidents: Knowing Who to Call May Railroad Commission of Texas June 27, 2016 (Change Date In First Master Slide)

EXAMINER S REPORT AND PROPOSAL FOR DECISION STATEMENT OF THE CASE

How to Submit Oil/Gas and UIC Completions (Forms W-2/G-1) Jacque Teseny Jim Moore Miriam Borrego. August 2018

RAILROAD COMMISSION OF TEXAS. Statewide Rule 15: Surface Cleanup Requirements (Form W-3C) Mysti Doshier

THE APPLICATION OF FORGE ENERGY, LLC, INC. TO AMEND FIELD RULES FOR THE SHAFTER LAKE, N. (SAN ANDRES) FIELD, ANDREWS COUNTY, TEXAS

OIL AND GAS DOCKET NO

Railroad Commission of Texas. Chairman Victor G. Carrillo Commissioner Elizabeth A. Jones Commissioner Michael L. Williams

Nevada Water Law 101 Overview

DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY WATER QUALITY DIVISION PERMIT APPLICATION FORM UNDERGROUND INJECTION CONTROL (UIC) CLASS V WELL

EXAMINERS' REPORT AND PROPOSAL FOR DECISION STATEMENT OF THE CASE

May 25, 2006 EXAMINER'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION STATEMENT OF THE CASE

Natural Gas Horizontal Well Control Act

Water Needs for Oil & Gas Well Drilling and Fracturing

No An act relating to hydraulic fracturing wells for natural gas and oil production. (H.464)

The State of Hydraulic Fracturing in CA: Where Are We, and Where Are We Going?

Long Term Risks and Liabilities in Shale E&P

Statewide Mutual Aid Compact

Recent Legislative Changes Affecting the Texas Class V Injection Well Program

Joe Rust Company

Regulatory Developments in Baseline Water Quality Testing and Monitoring. Presentation to Groundwater Protection Council

Review of Existing Injection Well Permit Regulations and Expectations of Future Geologic Sequestration CO 2 Regulations with Monitoring Conditions

OIL AND GAS DOCKET NO

Annex A ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION PART I. DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION PROTECTION OF NATURAL RESOURCES ARTICLE II.

ORDINANCE # 343. SECTION 1 - Add the following definitions to Section B as follows:

Water for Your Project: A Walkthrough

Aquifer Storage and Recovery in Oklahoma: A State Comparison

ORDINANCE NO. 16- AN ORDINANCE OF THE COUNTY OF PINELLAS, PROVIDING THAT THE PINELLAS COUNTY CODE BE AMENDED BY ADDING ARTICLE XIV

CONCENTRATE MANAGEMENT ISSUES: GENERAL & A FOCUS ON DEEP WELL INJECTION. Mike Mickley. P.E., Ph.D. Mickley & Associates Boulder, CO

Transcription:

Oil & Gas Law Class 4: RoC: Regulatory Responses (1 of 4) Intro & Well Spacing / Density 1

Regulatory Responses to RoC n What agency governs oil & gas issues in Texas? q Texas Railroad Commission ( RRC ) n Other States: q OK: OK Corp. Comm. q KS: Oil and Gas Conservation Comm n. q LA: Dept. of Natural Resources q CO: Oil and Gas Conservation Comm n. q NM: Energy Conservation and Management Div. of Energy, Minerals and Natural Resources Department n What other government agencies / levels of government can affect oil & gas operations in Texas? n A bit of history about the RRC n Admin law good basic summary on pp. 628-631 q Agency Orders presumed to be valid // must show arbitrary and capricious decision to overturn q Primary jurisdiction part of what Gregg v. Delhi-Taylor addressed 2

RRC History n 1891: RRC established q Has jurisdiction over rates and operations of RRs, terminals, wharves and express companies q To encourage railroad construction and development, the Fed. Gov t. gave them ROWs and also gave them land (including mineral rights) n 1917: Legislature declares PLs to be common carriers, and gives RRC jurisdiction. q First act to designate the RRC as agency to administer O&G conservation laws. 3

RRC Jurisdiction / Authority n What the RRC DOES regulate: q Drilling q Well spacing / density q Production rates / allowables q Pooling q Unitization q P & A q Completions q Intrastate PLs q Disposal of oilfield waste q Chemical injections into producing reservoirs q Gas well vs. Oil well n What the RRC DOES NOT regulate: q Transportation q Noise q Environmental q Insurance q Interstate PLs 4

Vocab Terms (pp. 40-41; 647-650) n Plugging and Abandonment ( P&A ) n Completion of a well: end of the drilling process, down the target depth / transition from drilling to production (by installing producing equipment) q Dual completion: 2 formations / zones q Multiple completion: >2 formations / zones n Recompletion of a well: after a well has been completed and has produced, it can be completed into a different (usually shallower) producing formation 5

Well Spacing and Density n These are the most significant limits n What are the purposes of well spacing and density rules? n See p. 652, FN 26, to see how broadly waste is defined in the Model Act n What is well spacing? n It s how far away from section boundary lines / lease lines and from other wells a particular well can be n What is density? n How many wells are allowed per acre (or, put another way, how many acres one well will cover) n What is an allowable? (from Wronski) 6

TX: Statewide Spacing (Rule 37) 1 n First enacted in 1919; TX is 1 st state to promulgate a well spacing rule n Purpose: q reduce waste by preventing excessive or disproportionate withdrawal rates from parts of a reservoir where wells would be clustered 7

TX: Statewide Spacing (Rule 37) 2 n 467 feet to any property line, lease line, or subdivision line and 1,200 feet to any well completed in or drilling to the same horizon on the same tract q Exceptions can be granted to prevent waste or to prevent the confiscation of property q Field Rules can be larger or smaller n This spacing limitation gives rise to a drilling unit (a/k/a spacing unit) 8

TX: Statewide Density (Rule 38) 1 n Assigns the number of acres you have to have before you can drill a well n Acreage size given: proration unit q Std. size for oil well proration unit is 40 acres q Std. size for gas well proration unit is 160 acres 9

TX: Density (Rule 38) Std. Units Spacing Rule Acreage Requirement 150 300 2 200 400 4 330 660 10 330 933 20 467 933 20 467 1200 40 660 1320 40 10

n Process Want to drill a well? n Apply for a drilling permit q In the application, you have to put down how many acres you have (Rule 38) and where the nearby property lines / other wells are, that are drilling in your objective formation (Rule 37) q If you meet the requirements of both Rules you get the permit and you can drill q If not enough acreage, or someone else is too close, NO PERMIT!! n unless you ask for some relief an exception 11

Larsen v. WY O&G Cons. Comm n. n 1 st thing to notice: picture on p. 658 n What s the fight really about? n The direction of the 80- acre spacing units n Appellants own X q q W/2 SE/4; SE/4 SE/4 SW/4 NE/4; SW/4 n Findings of fact & economic waste 12

Larsen v. WY O&G Cons. Comm n. n P. 656: insofar as it is reasonably practicable to do so q When a field is 1 st developed, not much is known about the reservoir and its production characteristics q t/f, the agency will often issue temporary rules initially to create relatively large units q Later, it reduces them as more info is known 13

Larsen v. WY O&G Cons. Comm n. n WY Ct: no economic waste n But most states allow the agency to consider economic waste n Should conservation agencies consider economic waste? n Reasons: q Well spacing rules = reservoir effectively and efficiently drained q If operator believes that a well won t provide enough of a return on investment, they won t drill a well à could cause underground waste q See p. 659 Note 2 14

Spacing and Density Exceptions n Rule 37(a)(3): q q the burden shall be on the applicant to establish that an exception to this section is necessary either to prevent waste or to prevent the confiscation of property. Such determination will be made only upon written request and a showing by the applicant that: competent, conclusive geological or engineering data indicate that no drainage of hydrocarbons from the particular tract(s) subject to the request will occur due to production from the applicant's proposed well n Rule 38(h)(1)(B): to get an exception to a density rule, applicant must file q engineering and/or geological data, including a written explanation of each exhibit, showing that the drilling of a well on substandard acreage is necessary to prevent waste or to prevent the confiscation of property; 15

Pattie v. Comm n. n Looking for oil but found gas n So what? What s the problem? n See p. 667, 3 rd n Why are the spacing rules different for oil and gas? Why larger for gas? n What s the difference / How do you decide if a well is a gas well or an oil well? n GOR : the gas-oil ratio q If > 10,000 cf/bbl, it s a gas well q If < 10,000 cf/bbl, it s an oil well 16

Exxon v. RRC n Different formations / depths n BTA claiming that allowing the exception location will prevent economic waste è by prolonging the life of an existing well n What this dispute is really about q Are Exxon s correlative rights really at issue? q Oil being produced from lower zone Exxon has a shallower gas well impact from BTA s recompletion on Exxon? 17

Next Class: n Small Tracts and Compulsory Pooling q Ch. 4 Sec. B 5: pp. 696 717 and 733 746 n ALSO q 2 supplemental cases (Ryan & Halbouty) and q Text of Rule 37(g) (a/k/a the Voluntary Subdivision Rule) 18