Supplementary Figure 1. Schematic illustration of the influence of reducing conditions on

Similar documents
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION

Reactions & Processes Influenced by Soil Wetness. Topics for Consideration. Reactions and Processes Influenced by Soil Wetness

A Robust Model for Biotic and Abiotic Degradation of Chlorinated Aliphatic Hydrocarbons in an In Situ Bioreactor

River transport and chemistry. Lecture Outline

Supplementary Figure 1: Comparison of Fe(II) oxidation of 0.5 mm dissolved

Antonio P. Mallarino Iowa State University, John E. Sawyer Iowa State University,

An Explanation of the Hydric Soil Technical Standard and Normal Precipitation

Long Term Treatment and Disposal of Landfill Leachate. Debra R. Reinhart Nicole Berge Eyad Batarseh University of Central Florida

Lecture 5. Exchange Reactions. Cation exchange Salt/Sodium Affected Soils Acid Soils

Cycling and Biogeochemical Transformations of N, P, S, and K

Cycling and Biogeochemical Transformations of N, P and S

Cycling and Biogeochemical Transformations of N, P and S

6. Organic Compounds: Hydrocarbons. General Comments Borden, Canada, tracer test Laurens, SC, gasoline spill Bemidji, MN, crude oil spill

CHEMICAL COMPOSITION OF NATURAL WATERS

Livestock and Poultry Environmental Learning Center Webcast Series October 17, 2008

Cycling and Biogeochemical Transformations of N, P, S, and K

Soil Physical Properties and Wastewater Treatment

River transport and chemistry

If you have an extra electron where do you put it?

Supplementary Figure 1: Seasonal CO2 flux from the S1 bog The seasonal CO2 flux from 1.2 m diameter collars during (a) fall 2014, (b) winter 2015,

Geochemical Nutrient Scavenging. High mountain lakes as model systems. Research Questions

What to do with extra electrons how combating eutrophication may affect mineralization pathways

Cycling and Biogeochemical Transformations of N, P, S, and K

Lecture 21: Soil Redox; Hydric Soils; Wetlands

Wetland Soils. Lecture outline: Importance of wetland soils

HYDRIC SOILS. By Neal Svendsen Resource Soil Scientist Natural Resources Conservation Service Sept 2006

Cycling and Biogeochemical Transformations of N, P, S, and K

Imagine the result. Ms. Jeannette DeBartolomeo Oil Control Program Maryland Department of Environment 1800 Washington Boulevard Baltimore, MD 21230

Impact of submarine groundwater discharge on biogeochemical processes and benthic fluxes in coastal sands

Nutrient Cycling in Soils

Plume Cut-Off Treatment Example

Chapter 4: Advanced Wastewater Treatment for Phosphorous Removal

R Explorative analysis of microbes, colloids and gases. SDM-Site Forsmark. Lotta Hallbeck, Karsten Pedersen Microbial Analytics Sweden AB

Soil properties and potential for change through management

Learning about Secondary Water Quality Impacts from the Bemidji Oil Spill

Nutrients; Aerobic Carbon Production and Consumption

Installing Equipment for the Hydric Soil Technical Standard

Topsoil Loss and Modification During Suburbanization: Impact on Demands for Municipal Water. R.G. Darmody

Response to interactive comments from Anonymous Referee #2 (bg )

Chris Gammons, Montana Tech. Rio Tinto, Spain

Remediation of Petroleum LNAPL MSECA 2012

C. Penn, J. Payne*, J. Vitale, J. McGrath and D. Haak Oklahoma State University University of Maryland Illinois River Watershed Partnership

The Carbon cycle. Atmosphere, terrestrial biosphere and ocean are constantly exchanging carbon

How to measure soil health. Caley Gasch NDSU Soil Health Research

Dissociation of Orthophosphoric Acid

GEOCHEMICAL MODULE FOR AMDTreat

Why Water Quality? FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE March 26, 2013

R Explorative analyses of microbes, colloids, and gases together with microbial modelling. Site description model SDM-Site Laxemar

Wastewater Treatment in Soils

MINING POLLUTION OF STREAM SEDIMENTS OF THE SMOLNIK STREAM. O. Lintnerová, P. Šottník, S. Šoltés

Disposal sites and Isotopes

Evolution of Dissolved Arsenic in Groundwater Downgradient of a Coal Ash Impoundment

Light-driven microbial dissimilatory electron transfer to hematite. Dao-Bo Li, Yuan-Yuan Cheng, Ling-Li Li, Wen-Wei Li, Yu-Xi Huang, Dan-Ni Pei,

Biological Transformations of Refuse

Introduction - Overview

Major changes in forest carbon and nitrogen cycling caused by declining sulphur deposition

Submerged Soils for Rice Production

Supplementary Material. The fate of arsenic in groundwater discharged to the Meghna River, Bangladesh

Nutrient Cycling in Soils: The Big 3 and Carbon

Microbial effects on geochemical behavior of arsenic in As-contaminated sediments

Evaluating the Effect of Substrate Type and Concentration in the Biodegradation of Petroleum Hydrocarbons

Lakes, Primary Production, Budgets and Cycling

Biology Factors Modifying Contaminant Effects

A Simple Diffusion Sampler for Pore- Water Hydrogen as a Tool for Understanding Redox Conditions in Saturated Sediment

BASICS OF WASTEWATER TREATMENT

Cycling and Biogeochemical Transformations of N, P, S, and K

Addressing Variable Phosphorus Solubility of Amendments in the Watershed Model

Plume Area Treatment Example

Metabolism Lectures. Outline:! Part I: Fermentations! Part II: Respiration! Part III: Metabolic Diversity

Lakes, Primary Production, Budgets and Cycling Schlesinger and Bernhardt (2013): Chapter 8, p

Soil Health. Low weed pressure. Good tilth. Sufficient depth. Large population of beneficial organisms. Good water storage and drainage

Landfarming of Petroleum Contaminated Soils What Goes Wrong. Kerry Sublette The University of Tulsa

Nitrogen & Bacteria. A biological journey through the environment

This is the 2 nd module of training course titled: Submerged Soils for Rice Production

Soil EC mapping technologies (EM38 and Veris) for identifying soil management zones

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION

Microorganisms & Biogeochemical Cycles

Developing Effective Plant Nutrition Programs for North Coast Vineyards

Anaerobic Benzene Biodegradation - Insights from Treatability Studies and Molecular Tools. Sandra Dworatzek

Ecosystem Consulting Service, Inc. July 15, P a g e

Soil testing: what it does and where is it going? Karen Daly Teagasc. Soil Fertility Conference, 19 th October Lyrath Co.

Hydrology and Water Quality. Water. Water 9/13/2016. Molecular Water a great solvent. Molecular Water

Phytoremediation- Humification Strategies for RDX in Surface Soil

EXAMPLE QUESTIONS NUTRIENT MANAGEMENT CERTIFICATION EXAM

Hydrology and Water Quality. Water. Water 9/11/2018. Molecular Water a great solvent. Molecular Water

Biogeochemistry of Wetlands

Sequestering Carbon in Cropping and Pasture Systems

Water Quality. CE 370 Lecture 1. Global Distribution of Earth s s Water

GEOCHEMICAL BEHAVIOR OF DISSOLVED IRON IN WATERS FROM

Services and Technologies

This document is a preview generated by EVS

Nutrient Cycling in an Aquatic Ecosystem

SWELL AND SWELLING POTENTAL PRESSURE TESTS

What s Happening in the Mud at the Bottom of the Bay?

NUTRIENT MANAGEMENT PLAN FIELD MONITORING 1. Bradford D. Brown ABSTRACT

Application of Waste to Soils

The Biology of Composting

Transport & Transformation of chemicals in an ecosystem, involving numerous interrelated physical, chemical, & biological processes

SUSTAINABILITY OF NATURAL ATTENUATION OF AROMATICS (BTEX) Final report

Response of soil respiration to the addition of chars - one way to estimate the stability of chars? Jürgen Kern, Giacomo Lanza

Transcription:

1 Supplementary Figure 1. Schematic illustration of the influence of reducing conditions on organic C bound to Fe. Under aerobic conditions, a significant fraction of soil C may be associated with Fe(III) oxyhydroxides. Under anaerobic conditions, a portion of those Fe(III) phases may be reduced by microbes to Fe 2+, releasing organic C in colloidal and soluble forms which are readily available or can be rapidly depolymerized for microbial assimilation.

2 Supplementary Figure 2. Initial CO 2 production from three Mollisols incubated under three soil moisture levels. (a) CO 2 production rate; (b) cumulative CO 2 production. The error bars indicate s.e.m. (n = 4).

3 Supplementary Figure 3. Carbon mineralization normalized by soil C from three Mollisols incubated under moisture levels at and above field capacity. (a) CO 2 production rate; (b) cumulative CO 2 production; (c) total C mineralization rate (CO 2 + CH 4 ); (d) cumulative total C mineralization (CO 2 + CH 4 ). The vertical dashed line indicates when gradual drainage was initiated in the saturated soils. The error bars indicate s.e.m. (n = 4).

4 Supplementary Figure 4. Changes in soil moisture in three Mollisols incubated under saturated treatment during drainage. The error bars indicate s.e.m. (n = 4).

5 Supplementary Figure 5. Carbon isotope ratios of CO 2 produced from three Mollisols incubated under moisture levels at and above field capacity. The vertical solid line indicates when CH 4 production began in the intermediate and saturated treatments, leading to increased δ 13 C values of CO 2 due to fractionation associated with methanogenic CO 2 reduction, and enrichment of δ 13 C in the residual CO 2. The vertical dashed line indicates when gradual drainage was initiated in the saturated soils. The error bars indicate s.e.m. (n = 4).

6 Supplementary Figure 6. Carbon isotope ratios of CH 4 produced from three Mollisols incubated under moisture levels at and above field capacity. Circles are means of four sampling dates, and the error bars indicate s.e.m. (n = 4).

7 Supplementary Figure 7. Cumulative mineralization of different C sources normalized by soil C in three Mollisols incubated under moisture levels at and above field capacity. (a, c) Short-term cumulative mineralization of C 4 -derived C (a) and C 3 -derived C (c) respired as CO 2 ; (b, d) long-term cumulative mineralization of C 4 -derived C (b) and C 3 -derived C (d) respired as CO 2 and CH 4. The vertical dashed line indicates when gradual drainage was initiated in the saturated soils. The error bars indicate s.e.m. (n = 4).

8 Supplementary Figure 8. Temporal variations of redox potential in three Mollisols incubated under three soil moisture levels. Data are expressed relative to the standard hydrogen electrode. Symbols represent daily means. The error bars indicate s.e.m. (n = 2 except for ridge soil (n = 1)).

9 Supplementary Figure 9. Concentrations of ferrous iron in three Mollisols at the end of incubations. The error bars indicate s.e.m. (n = 4). The lowercase letters indicate significant differences between the moisture treatments within each soil type (p < 0.05).

10 Supplementary Figure 10. Concentrations of ferrous iron and dissolved organic C in footslope soils extracted by inorganic dithionite and deionized water. (a) Ferrous iron (Fe(II)) concentration; (b) dissolved organic C (DOC) concentration. The error bars indicate s.e.m. (n = 5).

11 Supplementary Figure 11. Carbon isotope ratios of dissolved organic C in footslope soils incubated under field capacity and saturation. The error bars indicate s.e.m. (n = 4).

12 Supplementary Figure 12. Percentage of readily bioavailable DOC in footslope soils incubated under field capacity and saturation. Bioavailable DOC was measured during the additional incubation of the footslope soils, determined by incubating DOC samples with a microbial inoculum and measuring CO 2 production over five days, and normalizing by total DOC. The error bars indicate s.e.m. (n = 4).

13 Supplementary Figure 13. Map of the field site. The locations of soil sampling (blocks) are denoted by red squares (200 m x 200 m), and USDA soil series are denoted by orange text and lines. The white line is a 500 m scale bar. The Okoboji (depression) soils are indicated by 6, Canisteo (footslope) soils are L507, and Clarion (ridge) soils are L138B. Each soil series was sampled from six locations within each block and composited with the same series from the other blocks to generate a spatially representative sample for each series from the field. The soil map was generated by the Natural Resources Conservation Service Web Soil Survey1.

14 Supplementary Table 1 Soil physicochemical properties of the three Mollisols from 0 to 20 cm. Soils Soil texture ph Total C δ 13 C ( ) Total N C/N ratio Fe ca Fe cd Sand (%) Silt (%) Clay (%) mg g -1 mg g -1 µmol g -1 µmol g -1 Ridge 43 ± 7 28 ± 4 29 ± 3 6.65 ± 0.58 18 ± 4-21.85 ± 1.03 1.55 ± 0.34 12 ± 0 14.39 ± 3.24 119 Footslope 43 ± 3 30 ± 2 27 ± 1 6.98 ± 0.41 25 ± 2-20.37 ± 0.15 2.03 ± 0.11 12 ± 0 15.55 ± 4.59 106 Depression 22 ± 7 40 ± 4 38 ± 3 6.98 ± 0.46 34 ± 6-22.94 ± 0.52 2.73 ± 0.62 13 ± 1 17.07 ± 5.49 110 Values are means and s.e.m. (n = 3 except for Fe cd, where n = 1). Fe ca : citrate/ascorbate-extractable Fe; Fe cd : citrate/dithionite-extractable Fe.

15 Supplementary References 1. USDA-NRCS. Web Soil Survey. https://websoilsurvey.sc.egov.usda.gov (2017).