Proposal by Russia to delete hot spot 18.2

Similar documents
Proposal by Russia to delete hot sub-spot Hot sub-spot name South-West Wastewater Treatment Plant

WASTEWATER TREATMENT

CITY OF LONDON ENVIRONMENTAL & ENGINEERING SERVICES WASTEWATER TREATMENT OPERATIONS DIVISION

CITY OF LONDON ENVIRONMENTAL & ENGINEERING SERVICES WASTEWATER TREATMENT OPERATIONS DIVISION

Duffin Creek Water Pollution Control Plant Technical Information

Waste water treatment

Wastewater Pollutants & Treatment Processes. Dr. Deniz AKGÜL Marmara University Department of Environmental Engineering

Best Practice in Sewage and Effluent Treatment Technologies

Wastewater Treatment Processes

BIOLOGICAL WASTEWATER BASICS

Science Exploration. DHRITI BHATTACHARJEE Class : VII/C Roll No : 31

HELCOM Programme Implementation Task Force (HELCOM PITF) PITF 18/ th Meeting 6.2/5. Tallinn, Estonia 30 October November 2001

Contents General Information Abbreviations and Acronyms Chapter 1 Wastewater Treatment and the Development of Activated Sludge

Selecting a Treatment Technology for Manure Management Jactone Arogo Ogejo, Extension Specialist, Biological Systems Engineering, Virginia Tech

Wastewater Treatment clarifier

Domestic Waste Water (Sewage): Collection, Treatment & Disposal

Environmental Engineering. Wastewater treatment Product Information

TWO YEARS OF BIOLOGICAL PHOSPHORUS REMOVAL WITH AN ADVANCED MSBR SYSTEM AT THE SHENZHEN YANTIAN WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT

Primary: Removal of a portion of the suspended solids and organic matter from the wastewater by gravity

Sanitary Sewer Systems. Sewage Collection System. Types of Sewage 10/12/2016. General Overview

PHOSPHORUS RECOVERY FROM SEWAGE SLUDGE USING THE AQUACRITOX SUPERCRITICAL WATER OXIDATION PROCESS

WASTEWATER FROM CARBON CAPTURE SPECIAL CONSIDERATIONS FOR WASTEWATER TREATMENT

Mid-Halton Wastewater (Sewage) Treatment Plant Expansion And Effluent Sewer Public Information Centre # 1 May 14, 2009

HISTORY

Description of the Work

The Membrane Wastewater Treatment Plant in Ihn Layman s report

Wastewater Terms for Permit Applications

CASE STUDY: ROYAL AUSTRALIAN AIR FORCE BASE, AMBERLEY SEWAGE TREATMENT PLANT

WASTE WATER TREATMENT SYSTEM

SEWERAGE SYSTEM IN ULAANBAATAR

Lowering The Total Cost Of Operation

Wastewater treatment objecives

2017 Annual Performance Report

Sanitary and Environmental Engineering I (4 th Year Civil)

TREATMENT OF WASTE FROM PULP INDUSTRY

PACKAGED SEW AGE TREATMENT PLANT

Proposal by Lithuania for deletion of the Hot Spot No. 41 Šiauliai WWTP

City of Elk River Wastewater Treatment Facility Improvements. Achieving Wastewater Treatment Goals

Tour of Regional Water Reclamation Facility

Chapter 2: Description of Treatment Facilities

Preparing for Nutrient Removal at Your Treatment Plant

Wastewater Treatment Works... The Basics

Best practice in monitoring process, operation and maintenance of wastewater treatment plants 12 September 2011, Bucharest

INFRASTRUCTURE & OPERATION

AquaPASS. Aqua MixAir System. Phase Separator. System Features and Advantages. Anaerobic. Staged Aeration. Pre-Anoxic.

Innovative technology for phosphate removal from dewatered sludge supernatant

Sewage Treatment - overview

Waste Water Treatment Plant Overview and Tour

/ Marley MARPAK Modular Biomedia /

Causes. Release of waste water from drains or sewers (toilets, washing machines, and showers) and include human wastes, soaps and detergents.

Unit Treatment Processes in Water and Wastewater Engineering

SBR PROCESS FOR WASTEWATER TREATMENT

WASTEWATER DEPARTMENT. Bentonville Wastewater Treatment Plant Facts:

Kirill Ukhanov, GE Water & Process Technologies, Russia, describes how advanced membrane technology is helping a Russian refinery to meet stringent

Copies: Mark Hildebrand (NCA) ARCADIS Project No.: April 10, Task A 3100

PROCESS SIMULATOR FOR WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT

WATER AND WASTEWATER FACILITY CLASSIFICATION APPLICATION FORM

National University Of Kaohsiung Taiwan. T.Y.Yeh Professor Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering

AMPC Wastewater Management Fact Sheet Series Page 1

AMPC Wastewater Management Fact Sheet Series Page 1

2017 Annual Performance Report

Performance Evaluation of the Moores Creek Advanced Water Resource Recovery Facility

CASE STUDY EVANS HEAD STP : THE CASE NOT TO SHUT DOWN TRICKLE FILTERS AND INSTALL EXPENSIVE ALTERNATIVES. Frank Gnanam

The High-Tech of a Creek. The Biofilm Technology for Large Wastewater Treatment Plants.

Anderson Water Pollution Control Plant

COMBI-TREAT IMPROVED SBR TECHNOLOGY. 2.1Process Diagram:

NEW BIOLOGICAL PHOSPHORUS REMOVAL CONCEPT SUCCESSFULLY APPLIED IN A T-DITCH PROCESS WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT

Core Notes for Module 6 (Elective) of the Course Environmental Engineering Sustainable Development in Coastal Areas Mr M S Haider

SLUDGE TREATMENT AND DISPOSAL

INNOVATIVE TECHNOLOGY FOR PHOSPHATE REMOVAL FROM DEWATERED SLUDGE SUPERNATANT. Peter Reberger

Case Study. Biological Help for the Human Race. Bathurst Municipal Wastewater Treatment Works, New South Wales, Australia.

12.0 ASSESSMENT OF LEACHATE MANAGEMENT OPTIONS 12.1 Overview

General Information on Nitrogen

Municipal Wastewater Treatment Improvement Using Computer Simulating

REPORT TREATABILITY STUDIES, FEASIBILITY REPORT FOR TREATMENT OF WASTE WATER FOR. M/s DEEPAK NITRITE LTD., MIDC Taloja

MARPAK modular biomedia WASTEWATER TREATMENT

Proposal by Lithuania for deletion of the Hot Spot No 51 Kaunas WWTP

Dundalk Wastewater Treatment Plant

OPERATION AND MANAGEMENT OF WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANTS

Comparison between two techniques for sludge dewatering trials at Sjölunda and Klagshamn WWTPs

MUNICIPALITY OF WEST ELGIN RODNEY WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT

ECO Smart Aerobic Waste Water Treatment System. Optimising the re-use and recycling of waste water

Lycoming County Water and Sewer Authority WWTP Mechanical Thickened Aerobic Digester Case Study

American Water College 2010

Livestock and poultry producers are seeking. Solid-Liquid Separation. of Animal Manure and Wastewater E

Platzhalter für Bild

SOLUTIONS AND EQUIPMENT FOR LEACHATE TREATMENT

Feel free to contact me should you require any additional information regarding the report. I can be reached at

TREATMENT OF HOSPITAL WASTEWATER USING ACTIVATED SLUDGE COMBINED WITH BIOLOGICAL CONTACTOR

PAPER No.4 : Environmental Chemistry MODULE No.13 : Advanced Waste Water Treatment

Severn Trent Services Wastewater Solutions End-to-End Wastewater Treatment Solutions

ENVIRONMENTAL VISITATION CENTER ALEGRIA WWTP

Feasibility Report on Sewage Treatment Plant (STP)

Feasibility Report of Proposed ETP cum STP. M/s. Zakiya Healthcare Plot No.39, Pharmacity Selaqui, Dehradun (Uttarakhand)

QUESTIONNAIRE POND TREATMENT PLANT OLOID Agitate, Circulate, Aerate

Removal of Heavy Metal from Landfill Leachate Using Vertical Flow Construction Wetland

International Journal of Science, Environment and Technology, Vol. 4, No 5, 2015,

FEASIBILITY REPORT OF 250 KLD SEWAGE TREATMENT PLANT

SWANA 2017 Leachate Basics and Quality Changes with Organics Removal. Steve Johnson M.Eng., P.Eng.

Characterization and Design of Sewage Treatment Plant in Bidar City

Transcription:

Proposal by Russia to delete hot spot 18.2 1. Hot spot Central Aeration Station 2. Location 1, Bely Island, St. Petersburg 3. Reasons for designation of hot spot Discharges of phosphorus higher than requirements 4. Reason for hot spot deletion 4.1. Technical specifications of Central Aeration Station (CAS) Central Aeration Station was put into operation: 1 st phase in 1978 (750 000 m 3 /d), 2 nd phase in 1985 (750 000 m 3 /d) of design capacity 1,500,000 m 3 /d. Design treatment parameters : SS < 15 ; BOD tot < 15. Flow rate per second in dry weather: average 17.4 m 3 /s, design 20 m 3 /s, in rainy weather 30 m 3 /s. If flow rate of 30 m 3 /s (108 000 m 3 /h) is exceeded, the excess wastewater is discharged via emergency gate (throughput capacity 28,000 m 3 /h) located in receiving chamber. WWTP layout Main pump station has 9 pumps: 5 FV-14-6/58 pumps (FV 21600/58) of 6 m 3 /s capacity and 4 ZOFV-13 pump aggregates (FV9000/63) of 2.5 m 3 /s capacity, 4 mechanical screens (100mm) for the protection of pumps from coarse matter and clogging. Wastewater pre-treatment: 13 grates (6 mm). The solids trapped by the grates are taken to a landfill. Upon that, wastewater goes to 12 horizontal sand traps (4800 m 3 ). Design flow rate of wastewater in sand traps is 0.115 m/s. Sand is removed by hydraulic elevators to sand grounds. Once mineralized on sand grounds, the sand is used for CAS surfacing. Mechanical treatment Following pretreatment wastewater goes to 12 primary radial settlers (54m in diameter and 5.3m deep). Settling time at design flow rate is 2.3 hours. Sludge from the primary settlers is filtered at 2mm grates, treated at hydrocyclone and pumped to sludge dewatering stage. Biological treatment: 12 aeration tanks that comprise pre-anoxide, anaerobic, 1 st aerobic, anoxide and 2 nd aerobic zones that provide for biological removal of phosphorus, nitrogen and organic impurities. Treatment time in aeration tank at design capacity 620500 m 3 /h is 5.4 hours. Sludge mix from aeration tanks goes to 12 secondary radial settlers where active sludge is settled, settling time being 2.3 hours. Settler scrapers are designed for continuous operation. Sludge treatment. Excess active sludge is thickened at 4 sludge thickeners (33m). Solid matter content in thickened sludge is 2.5%. The mixture of raw sludge and thickened sludge at 96.0-97.0% moisture content is fed to sludge treatment phase where it is filtered at mechanical grate (2 mm). Separated sludge goes to sludge receiving tank. Following that, the sludge goes to dewatering phase, the tank with 2 mixers. Mixed sludge is dewatered at 10 centrifuges using polymer flocculants (6 kg/t of dry matter). Design capacity to trap solid particles is 96% at 70-75% moisture content of dewatered sludge. The effluent is fed to CAS receiving chamber. Dewatered sludge tank is used when operation is stopped (total volume being 160 m 3 ). page 2 of 6

The cake from the centrifuge is unloaded into the hopper via which it is pumped by Schwing КSР piston pumps to incinerator via 8 injectors located in a circle around the furnace. Sludge is pumped by 2 pumps via four pressure lines to one incinerator. Sludge incineration. The major Pirofluid incineration technology is incineration of dewatered sludge in quartz sand fluidized bed furnace. Incineration phase comprises 4 furnaces. Incineration furnace is a metal structure 12m high that consists of two cylinders one above the other and connected with each other. The lower 4.5m cylinder is a blow chamber, the upper 7.5m cylinder is a reactor. The blow chamber and the reactor are separated with selfbearing arch of fire bricks wherein air nuzzles are inserted. 37 tonnes of quartz sand (30% fine, 50% medium and 20% coarse) is fed on the arch via injector. Fluidization air that is burning air at the same time is fed to the blow chamber following pre-heating to 600-650 С in recuperator with flue gases. From the blow chamber air via nozzles goes to sand layer and fluidizes it. Sand layer temperature is maintained at 750-850 С. The organic matter of the sludge is oxidized by excess oxygen and turns into gaseous products of burning, while the mineral matter is taken away by flue gases as ash. Ash generated by sludge burning is landfilled. 4.2. Measures implemented to meet requirements, including the implementation of the best available technologies and environmental practice. CAS aeration tanks were updated to reach required nutrient level through total nitrogen removal and biological treatment of phosphorus to meet requirements. Anoxide (denitrification processes), anaerobic zones (phosphates removal) and aerobic (oxidation of ammonium nitrogen) were made. Such design and technology adjustments allowed to meet requirements in 2006. Considering special role of phosphorus in the eutrophication of the Gulf of Finland, Vodokanal management decided to reduce phosphorus to 1.0 and later to 0.5. Biological treatment is not enough to reach such parameters. In this respect John Nurminen Foundation and Plancenter (Finland) offered to use chemical coagulation and settling of phosphates using Fe 2 (SO 4 ) 3 Ferix-3 agent produced by Kemira. The agent was tested and applied: to effluent, to sludge prior to dewatering, to internal sewer, to sludge mix prior to secondary settlers and to wastewater prior to primary settlers. The highest effect was reached when Fe 2 (SO 4 ) 3 was added to wastewater prior to primary settlers. Chemical settling of phosphorus in primary settlers Ferix-3 continuous dosing started in November 2008 via distributed channels of primary settlers. Optimum reagent dosage is 35 g/m 3. Chemical settling of phosphates results only in partial of concentration at primary settlers output. The major part of phosphates is removed from wastewater in aerobic zone of aeration tanks. The key factor for maximum phosphates removal is maximum phosphates release in the anaerobic zones of aeration tanks and sufficient amount of dissolved oxygen in the aerobic zone for the consumption of phosphates by phosphorus accumulating microorganisms. 4.3. Capital investments CAS reconstruction cost is 58.2 million. Operation tests for chemical settling of phosphorus at CAS have terminated now. Chemical reagent dosing installation is being installed. The project is carried out under the bilateral cooperation between Russia and Finland. Total project cost is 288,536. John Nurminen Foundation supplied equipment worth 57, 900. page 3 of 6

Total phosphorus contncentrations, Концентрация фосфора общего, мг/л 4.4. Monitoring data on pollutant discharges during last four years Average concentrations in 2008 at CAS output were: BOD 5 4.6, total nitrogen 9.0, total phosphorus 0.8. The chart below illustrates pollutant concentrations in terms of total phosphorus at CAS input and output in 2005-2009. Phosphorus concentrations at CAS input and output in 2005-2009 Концентрация фосфора общего на входе и выходе ЦСА в 2005-2009 гг 5 4,5 4 3,5 3 2,5 2 1,5 1 0,5 0 4,7 4,4 4 4,1 4,2 1,9 1,5 0,96 0,77 0,46 2005 2005г 2006 2006г 2007 2007г 2008 2008г 9 months 2009г(9 2009 месяцев) P tot at input фосфор общий вход,мг/л P tot at output фосфор общий выход,мг/л page 4 of 6

5 Analysis of WWTP operation for compliance to Recommendation 28Е/5 Wastewater treatment (> 100,000 PE) ) Year BOD 5 N tot. Р tot. % requirements % requirements % requirements ) 2005 5.0 96 15.0 9.0 57 10.0 1.9 52 0.5 2006 4.6 96 or 80% 9.8 51 or 70-80% 1.5 63 or 90% 2007 5.2 96 8.9 59 0.96 80 2008 4.6 96 9.0 60 0.77 83 9 months 2009 4.5 97 9.7 60 0.46 89 ) requirement to be reached not later than 31 December 2010. page 5 of 6

6. Programmes of monitoring and control of pollutants Control of treated wastewater discharges is done in accordance with the document The procedure for departmental control of WWTP operation, wastewater composition and the impact thereof upon hydrochemical regime of water body. The procedure for CAS control Sampling point WWTP input WWTP output Wastewater outlet into Neva estuary in the Gulf of Finland, 500m radius area Sampling method Automatic sampler Manual sampler Sample type Daily average Single Single Sampling frequency Daily, each 2 hours Once in ten days Once in 30 days Once in ten days Once in a month (August- October) Parameters рн, suspended matter, ash content in suspended matter; phosphates phosphorus; ammonia nitrogen; nitrate nitrogen; nitrite nitrogen; COD Total nitrogen; total phosphorus; dry residue; ash content in dry residue; copper; total iron; nickel; zinc; mercury; aluminium; manganese; surfactants; phenols; chlorides BOD tot. Temperature; oil products; dissolved oxygen; coliphages; helminths eggs ; pathogenic micro flora Temperature, рн; odour; colour; COD; BOD 5 ; suspended matter; dissolved oxygen; total nitrogen; total phosphorus; oil products; helminths eggs; coliphages; pathogenic micro flora; manganese; iron; mercury. page 6 of 6

Additional information concerning Municipal Sub-Hot -Spot 18.2 Central Station Aeration (CSA) Area population >100,000 people Assessment of CSA operation compliance with Recommendation 28E/5 Municipal Wastewater treatment BOD5 P total N total Month % requirements % requirements % requirements January 3.7 96.9 0.45 85.8 9.9 52.0 February 5.6 94.6 0.32 92.6 11.3 61.5 March 4.8 96.0 0.3 93.3 10.7 62.2 April 4.6 96.1 0.27 93.7 10.6 55.6 May 5.2 95.7 0.64 86.2 9.7 65.2 June 5.1 96.1 15.0 0.8 80.5 0.5 8.6 65.9 10.0 July 2.4 97.8 or 80% 0.24 94.5 or 90% 7.9 62.2 or 70-80% Reduction Reduction Reduction August 4.8 95.4 0.3 92.2 8.3 61.2 September 2.1 97.9 0.7 82.2 10.0 55.0 October 3.6 96.2 0.37 99.0 9.1 53.2 November 2.8 97.3 0.44 88.4 10.5 53.3 December 3.6 96.0 0.49 96.7 9.6 58.4 Mean 4.03 96.33 0.44 90.43 9.68 58.81 page 7 of 6

Area population >200,000 people Assessment of CSA operation compliance with Recommendation 28E/5 Municipal Wastewater treatment in 2009 year Recommendation 28E/5 will enter into force in December 2012 BOD5 P total N total Month % requirements % requirements % requirements January 3.7 96.9 0.45 85.8 9.9 52.0 February 5.6 94.6 0.32 92.6 11.3 61.5 March 4.8 96.0 0.3 93.3 10.7 62.2 April 4.6 96.1 0.27 93.7 10.6 55.6 May 5.2 95.7 0.64 86.2 9.7 65.2 June 5.1 96.1 0.8 80.5 8.6 65.9 15.0 0.5 10.0 July 2.4 97.8 0.24 94.5 7.9 62.2 or 80% or 90% or 70-80% August 4.8 95.4 Reduction 0.3 92.2 Reduction 8.3 61.2 Reduction September 2.1 97.9 0.7 82.2 10.0 55.0 October 3.6 96.2 0.37 99.0 9.1 53.2 November 2.8 97.3 0.44 88.4 10.5 53.3 December 3.6 96.0 0.49 96.7 9.6 58.4 Average 4,0 96.3 0.44 90.4 9.6 89.0 page 8 of 6

Assessment of CSA operation compliance with Recommendations superseded by Recommendation 28E/5: 9/2 concerning measures aimed at the of discharges from urban areas by the use of effective methods in wastewater treatment ; 16/9 Nitrogen removal at Municipal sewage water treatment plants. BOD5 P tot. N tot. Year % 2005 5.0 96 Recommendation 9/2 % 1.9 52.0 Recommendation 9/2 % 9.0 57 2006 4.6 96 1.5 63.0 9.8 51 15.0 2007 5.2 96 1.5 or 90% 0.96 80.0 8.9 59 2008 4.6 96 0.77 83.0 9.0 60 Recommendation 16/9 10.0 70-80 % 2009 4,0 96.3 0.44 90.4 9.6 89.0 page 9 of 6