Monitoring Remedial Effectiveness in a River System

Similar documents
South River Remedia/on Proposal: Preliminary Monitoring and Community Outreach Plan. South River Science Team March 2014

LEARNINGS FROM IMPLEMENTATION OF A COMPREHENSIVE MONITORING PROGRAM IN THE SOUTH RIVER, VA

AOC 4 Long-term Monitoring Program Assessment. Former DuPont Waynesboro Site, Virginia Area of Concern (AOC) 4

COMMONWEALTH of VIRGINIA

Assessment Summary 2006

Nancy Grosso, DuPont. Clay Patmont, Anchor QEA

Risk Assessment Program Progress Report October 9, 2013

Calculating risk change with management actions using Bayesian networks for the South River, Virginia, USA. By Annie F. Johns

Use of a Carbon Amendment to Reduce Bio-uptake of Mercury in a South River Floodplain Pond: Technical Briefing Paper

Health & Ecological Risk Assessment

Supporting Online Material for

PCB DISTRIBUTION AND ACCUMULATION PATTERNS IN AN ECOSYSTEM WIDE INVESTIGATION OF THE KALAMAZOO RIVER FLOOD PLAIN, MICHIGAN USA

Energy. Raw materials to make building blocks of life. From sun or chemicals. From food

Linking Fish and Wildlife Tissue Residues to Contaminant Concentrations in Water and Sediment

Memorandum. Riparian and aquatic habitat Benthic community structure River access / aesthetics

South River Site Conceptual Model. SRST HydroQual April 17, 2007

2. Which example describes a mutualistic relationship between organisms? A. Young wasps prey on caterpillars.

EnviroChallenge 2018

Health & Ecological Risk Assessment

Mercury Bioaccumulation within Terrestrial Foodwebs in the Northeastern United States

Food Webs of the Great Rivers of the Central Basin: Application of Stable Isotopes in Bioassessment

Food Chains, Food Webs, and Bioaccumulation Background

food webs quiz What will most likely happen to the foxes and the wolves if the rabbits are removed? C. D.

Ecosystem Ecology. The biological and physical components of the environment are a single interactive system in the concept of the ecosystem

A Probabilistic Fate and Effects Model for Pharmaceuticals and Personal Care Products

Assessing Ecological Conditions in the Delaware Estuary

Aquifer Storage and Recovery Regional Study

A Bayesian Approach to Integrated Ecological and Human Health Risk Assessment for the South River, Virginia Mercury-Contaminated Site

The Basics: Objectives

What is the radiological/ecological impact of NORM residues and effluents on the environment

Human Health and Ecological Integrated Risk Assessment, South River and Upper Shenandoah

Agenda South River Science Team February 8, DEQ Office Harrisonburg, VA. 9:00 Welcome, Introductions Don Kain

Dynamic Coupling of Hydrodynamic and Ecological Models

Methylmercury Monitoring Plan. For Surface Water Quality. Muskrat Falls Reservoir, Churchill River and Lake Melville

2017 Clean Rivers Program Steering Committee Meeting. March 10, 2016 Karnes City Lodge 309 S. US HWY 181, Karnes City, TX 78118

A consumer that eats secondary consumers is a tertiary, or third level, consumer. Snakes and hawks are often the tertiary consumers in a food chain.

UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY REGION BROADWAY NEW YORK, NEW YORK 10007

Mercury. Toxic trace element Occurs naturally Anthropogenic sources Methyl form of most concern

A landscape perspective of stream food webs: Exploring cumulative effects and defining biotic thresholds

USE OF ECOLOGICAL RISK ASSESSMENT TO GUIDE REMEDIATION AT THE TECK PINCHI LAKE MERCURY MINE

UPDATES TO THE ERICA TOOL VERSION RELEASED 2014

LIST OF TECHNICAL APPENDICES

Maumee Area of Concern Water Quality Database Development

Setting the Course for Improved Water Quality Tackling a Biological Impairment: The Groundhouse River TMDL Study Case Example

Chapter 34 Nature of Ecosystems. Copyright The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. Permission required for reproduction or display.

Food Web Of the Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem

Localized Mercury Bioaccumulation Study

Lesson Overview. Energy Flow in Ecosystems. Lesson Overview. 3.3 Energy Flow in Ecosystems

Lesson Overview. Lesson Overview THINK ABOUT IT. Food Chains and Food Webs. Food Chains and Food Webs. Food Chains. Food Chains

Ecosystem. Ecosystems. Consumers. Simple Ecosystem Model. Trophic Levels. Food Chain marsh hawk

Question #2 An animal that eats berries, insects and seeds would be placed in which classification? A) carnivore

1. Open the Virtual Lab entitled Model Ecosystems by following this link:

What a Web We Weave!

Ecology is the study of interactions among organisms and between organisms and their physical environment

In the energy pyramid, what number would the A represent at the herbivore level? lb 2. 50,000 lb lb lb 45% 25% 15% 15%

Federal Contaminated Sites Action Plan (FCSAP)

Response of Wildlife to Riparian Habitat. David A. Manuwal College of Forest Resources UW

Mercury Studies in the Sierra Nevada

Angel International School - Manipay 2 nd Term Examination March, 2016

Susquehanna River Smallmouth Bass Disease Investigation

Stable Isotope Analysis of Aquatic Macroinvertebrates, Stream Water, and Algae in Nine Mile Run, Pittsburgh, PA

Watershed Investigations: How to Assess the Health of a Stream

MODARIA Working Group 4

Multiple Choice. Name Class Date

Ecological/Watershed Modeling. Cindy Ryals Taylor Carroll

Ecosystems and Biomes

Living Things Need Energy

Unit 11.1: The Science of Ecology

Save Our. Water. Grant Felice Mason County Middle School

Todd M. Swannack, Ph.D., Candice D. Piercy, Ph.D. & Patrick S. O Brien, P.E. Integrated Ecological Modeling Environmental Laboratory, US Army ERDC

Trends and Perspectives of Ecological Risk Assessments for Dioxin-Like Compounds in the Great Lakes Basin. Wisla, Poland

Benthic Macroinvertebrates (BMI) Identification

M E M O R A N D U M 1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Components of Estuarine and Marine Ecological Risk Assessment

SCI-4 Kaechele_Dix_4.5_Animals Test Exam not valid for Paper Pencil Test Sessions

Fish Conservation and Management

Ecological Risk Assessment and the Tittabawassee River, Why, How and Who Cares

Western North America Mercury Synthesis (WNAMS)

biology Slide 1 of 39 End Show Copyright Pearson Prentice Hall

4-4 Aquatic Ecosystems

2. 2. Nutrient Cycles in Ecosystems. Before You Read. How are nutrients cycled in the biosphere? How does the carbon cycle work?

Appendix I. Results of Sensitivity Modeling Analyses Relating to Fish

Anacostia River Sediment Project Current Status. September 28, 2017

BLM 1-1, You and Food Chains/ Science Inquiry. BLM 1-2, Flowchart of Connecting Links/Reinforcement. BLM 1-4, Getting to the Top/ Reinforcement

Contaminated Sediment Conceptual Site Models and Remediation

CHAPTER 6: ECOSYSTEMS AND ECOSYSTEM MANAGEMENT

1. Which of the following is the best description of the role of the producer in the food chain illustrated below?

Food/Energy Web Student Pages 1

Food Chains and Webs. ecosystem: a community of living and nonliving things in their natural environment

Jackson Lake Analysis

SCIENCE 1206 UNIT 1 INTRODUCTION TO ECOLOGY

SCIENCE 1206 UNIT 1 INTRODUCTION TO ECOLOGY

Eat or Be Eaten (Complements What s for Lunch? Food Chains and Food Webs Teacher Guide)

!"#$%&"'(")*+,-./)('/,*"0,-&1$()$(/

Mercury Bioaccumulation and Trophic Transfer in the Cache Creek Watershed, California, in Relation to Diverse Aqueous Mercury Exposure Conditions

KEEYASK TRANSMISSION PROJECT EA REPORT APPENDIX C VALUED ENVIRONMENTAL COMPONENTS

Habitat Assessment Report for Candidate Phase 1 Areas Hudson River PCBs Superfund Site

Shenandoah River Fish Kill Investigation

The Biogeochemical Cycling of Mercury within Lake Powell, Glen Canyon National Recreation Area, Utah-Arizona

1) Community interactions between fish and other taxonomic groups? Type of interaction

Transcription:

Monitoring Remedial Effectiveness in a River System JR Flanders - URS Corp Ralph Stahl, Jr., PhD, DABT DuPont CRG November 11, 2014 SETAC North America Annual Meeting Vancouver, BC

Goals and Objectives of Monitoring Overall goal: - Assess efficacy of remedy to reduce transport and exposure pathways - Secondarily to improve WQ and bank habitat Specific objectives are to monitor: - Human and ecological exposure to mercury - System responses to remediation - Integrity of corrective action; and - Provide input to adaptive management framework and relative risk models

Monitoring Features Monitoring is: - Front-loaded - Iterative, and may be scaled back or modified pending results, and Contains short-term and long-term elements - Differ in terms of spatial and temporal scope - Similar overall goals

Short-Term Monitoring Objectives Objective: test effectiveness of Phase I Interim Measure - Bank stabilization between RRM 0 to 2 to reduce: Bank erosion Mercury loading In-channel mercury exposure Short time frame (2-10 years) Small spatial scales (BMAs) Remediation of downstream reaches informed by remedy success on RRM 0-2

Short-Term Monitoring Elements 11 locations within RRM 0-2 Potential exposure media to be evaluated: - Near-bank Sediment -Periphyton - Transplanted Asiatic Clams -Pore Water Vegetation/Habitat Monitoring Monitoring activities to begin in 2015

Results of Pilot Bank Stabilization: 2009 to 2014

Long-Term Monitoring Timeframe is >10 years Focus is South River and SFS River Objectives: - Monitor human exposure to MeHg in food - Monitor ecological exposure to MeHg in aquatic and terrestrial food web - Monitor potential improvements to water quality and benthic habitat Three main components - Human exposure - Ecological exposure Aquatic and terrestrial - Habitat quality

Human Exposure Monitoring Three potential exposure media are being evaluated: - Adult Smallmouth and Largemouth Bass - Snapping Turtles - Mallard Ducks Once annual monitoring 13 monitoring locations - South River (4) - South Fork Shenandoah (7) - Shenandoah (2) Community outreach - Signage - Physician and clinic outreach - Angler surveys - Outreach to non-english speaking communities

Summary of Bass Tissue Results Notes: SMB = smallmouth bass, LMB = largemouth bass, SR = South River, SF = South Fork Shenandoah River, SH = Shenandoah River, THg = Total mercury, MeHg = Methylmercury, LTM = Long- Term Monitoring Program. Data are shown as concentrations of mercury species in fish fillets (mean standard deviation). Data are limited to fish >170mm total length sampled within the LTM sample location reaches from 2000 to 2014.

Aquatic Ecological Exposure Monitoring Three potential exposure media are being evaluated: - Asiatic Clams - Mayflies - Periphyton - Sediment - Young-of-Year Smallmouth Bass Benthic Community Assessment Eight Monitoring Locations - South River (5) - South Fork Shenandoah (2) - Middle River (1) (Reference Area)

Trophic Level 2 Trophic Level 3 Trophic Level 4 Trophic Level 1 South River Terrestrial Mercury Trophic Transfer Diagram Legend Isotope data available Items in bold are focal species in ERA Isotope data not available Predatory Bird (Screech Owl, Red-tailed hawk) Herbivorous Mammals (White-tailed Deer) Box height proportional to variability of trophic position in model Sources: Newman, M. 2011. Trophic Analysis and Modeling. Harrisonburg, VA. October. Newman et al. 2011. Environ. Poll. 159 (10): 2840-2844. Small Mammals (Deer mouse) Vegetatio n Soil Insectivorous Bird (Tree Swallow, Bluebird, Phoebe, Song sparrow) Grainivorous Birds (Cardinal, Titmouse, Towhee) Herbivorous Insects (Tent Caterpillar) Invertivorous Mammals (Shrew) Detritus Insectivorous Mammals (Big brown bat) Predatory Invertebrates (Spiders) Aquatic Invertebrates Detritivores (Isopods, Annelids)

Terrestrial Ecological Exposure Monitoring Four potential exposure media are being evaluated: - Earthworms and Soil - Wolf Spiders - Carolina Wren Nine Monitoring Locations - South River (5) - South Fork Shenandoah (4)

Water Quality and Benthic Habitat Quality South River benthic habitat impaired RRM 0 to 14: - Phosphorous and sedimentation - May improve slowly as BMPs adopted Surface water: - Interannual variability - Long-term data set

How Will the Data be Used? DATA SOURCES South River Database Long-Term Monitoring Data Update relative risk model: Mercury in biota Life history data Water quality data (temperature, dissolved oxygen) DATA INTEGRATION Relative Risk Model Comparison of short-term data with long-term data Comparison with long-term trends in climate data Methylation status of river Use results of relative risk model to adjust management alternatives Short-Term Monitoring Data Before-after comparison of data Place short-term monitoring results in context of long-term trends Test hypotheses Adaptive Management Plan Following periodic review of management program, adjust monitoring as necessary.

Questions www.dgif.virginia.gov/fishing/waterbodies/photos/south%20river.jpg