VOL. 27, NO. 1 March 2010

Similar documents
1. Good 29News 2. Bad News 3. Good News

This component of the toolbox will discuss how wetlands fit into the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change and the development of

Guidelines for a Mangrove Management Plan Cayman Islands, BWI. M. L. Anderson

Wetlands and Estuaries:

Guyana s Coastal Zone Climate change and the Coastal Zone Guyana s Coastal Mangrove Ecosystem Climate Impacts Mitigation and Adaptation methods

Environmental Constraints on the Restoration Success of Black Mangrove Habitats in the Northern Gulf of Mexico

39. WETLANDS Introduction. Wetlands and Waterbodies Cook Inlet Drainages

Maritime Forest Ridge and Marsh Recreation Project

Lesson 2-2: Riparian Zones

Citation Vietnamese Academy of Science and T P.255-P

OCEANOGRAPHY. 11. The Coastal Ocean notes from the textbook, integrated with original contributions Part 2: Wetlands, and Pollution

Effectiveness Monitoring of Restoration Projects in the Columbia River Estuary from a Practitioner s s Perspective

STRATEGIC PLAN Jug Bay Wetlands Sanctuary STRATEGIC PLAN

From My Backyard to Our Bay It s the 911 for the Chesapeake Bay

Tampa Port Authority

Resource Protection Areas: Nontidal Wetlands Guidance on the Chesapeake Bay Preservation Area Designation and Management Regulations June 18, 2007

Prioritizing Local Action. Strengthening the Resilience of the Taunton River Watershed

Case Study: Alfieri Site Site Characterization to Risk Management Decisions. Allan S. Motter NJDEP/BEERA

Research Question What ecological and other services do coastal wetlands provide?

Rufford Small Grant. (for Nature Conservation) In association with the Whitley Laing Foundation REPORT

Global Warming, Water Quality, and the Future of Water Resources in the Southeast. Ann Yoachim Tulane Institute on Water Resources Law & Policy

David Lidholm. bioscience explained Vol 7 No 2. Mangrove forests threatened by human exploitation

Estuary Adventures. Background. Objective

This presentation will focus on wetland ecosystems and the many services that they provide. It will discuss the current extent of wetlands and

WHERE WISDOM IS FREE. Dr. Ajai Singh Uttar Banga Krishi Viswavidyalaya West Bengal

An Analysis of IMC Estimated Reclamation Costs for the Proposed Ona Mine

Department of the Army Permit Application

MANAGEMENT OF WATERFRONT PROPERTIES FOR HOMEOWNERS

Achieving the Philosophy of GOMA Through MsCIP

Ecological Considerations in Setting MFLs and Lake Regulation Targets for the Ocklawaha Chain of Lakes

Freshwater ecosystems

Chapter 13: Wildlife and Vegetation

Estuarine Restoration in San Francisco Bay: Design and Adaptive Management. Environmental Management of Enclosed Coastal Seas

Ocklawaha River Restoration as Mitigation

Restoring Ecosystems, Strengthening Communities October 20 25, 2012 Tampa, Florida

Progress Report on ECOLOGICAL MANGROVE RESTORARTION PROJECT IN THE AYEYARWADY DELTA. MYANMAR

South Bay Salt Pond Restoration Project Long-Term Restoration Planning

Climate Change Vulnerability Assessment and Adaptation Opportunities for Salt Marsh Types in Southwest Florida

Research Projects. General List of Contents. 3.1 List of Priority Research Areas 3.2 Projects Lists 3.3 Project Reports

Coastal Wetlands. About Coastal Wetlands. Contact Us. Water: Wetlands. You are here: Water Our Waters Wetlands Coastal Wetlands

Salt Marsh Restoration. Mary Ann Metcalf

A Vision for a Healthy, Productive, and Sustainable Galveston Bay

719 Griswold, Suite 820 Detroit, MI DANVERS POND DAM REMOVAL AND STREAM RESTORATION PROJECT

VEGETATIVE, WATER, FISH AND WILDLIFE RESOURCES POLICIES

Integrated Coastal Zone Management Project Republic of India

Issues in measuring and managing changes to the ecological character of the Western Port Ramsar Site as a result of climate change

Duwamish Waterway Self Guided Tour: Turning Basin Number Three and Terminal 105 Aquatic Habitat Restoration Sites

Gray s Creek. Gray s Creek

Protecting and Restoring Habitat (Fact Sheet)

Upper Mississippi River. Systemic Forest Stewardship Plan. Executive Summary

COASTAL CONSERVANCY. Staff Recommendation June 16, 2005 PIER 94 WETLAND ENHANCEMENT. File No Project Manager: Joan Cardellino

WETLANDS. Presented By: Cara Abbott Program Manager / Education and Outreach Coordinator for The Institute for Regional Conservation

SW-74 SERENOVA PRESERVE SITES 2, 3, 4, 8 MITIGATION PLAN

Impacts of Sea Level Rise on Ecosystem Services in Florida

Debbie DeVore South Florida Coastal Program U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Vero Beach, FL

CHAPTER 4. Mangrove Recovery and Restoration

Restoring Lost Saltmarsh to Create Habitat Connectivity

BMP 5.4.2: Protect /Conserve/Enhance Riparian Areas

Lesson Overview 4.5 Aquatic Ecosystems

Everglades Restoration Goals

HOUSE BILL lr0052

Maria W. Merrill Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission Aquatic Habitat Conservation and Restoration Section April 12, 2013

Adapting Living Shorelines: Siting and Design for Climate Impacts

Mangrove Replanting Plan for Hihifo District Fo ui, Ha avakatolo, Kolovai and A hau November 2017

Mangrove rehabilitation under climate change: towards a hydrological tool for quantifying the effect of expected sea level rise on mangroves

Wildlife and Agricultural Ecosystems

Gulf of Mexico Hydrological Restoration Criteria for Identifying and Prioritizing Projects

What is an ecosystem?

North Carolina s Wetlands

Watershed. Rigaud River Report Card. Grades: Forest Conditions Wetland Conditions Surface Water Quality

Multipurpose Wetland Creation and Restoration to Improve Water Quality and Wildlife Habitat in Coastal Urban Bayous

Phase II: Construction (See Appendix 1 for figures and photos)

Restoration = return of a wetland from a disturbed or altered condition caused by human activity to a previously existing condition

CORAL REEFS. Coral reefs are home to many organisms Provide habitat and shelter for 25 percent of all fish species in the deeper parts of the ocean.

Climate: describes the average condition, including temperature and precipitation, over long periods in a given area

Maryland s s Critical Area Program

Appendix B Stormwater Site Plan Submittal Requirements Checklist

ASWM Annual Meeting March 30, 2016 NCTC, Shepherdstown, WV. Andrew Robertson, Director

biology Slide 1 of 39 End Show Copyright Pearson Prentice Hall

9/4/2013 CHAPTER 4 ECOLOGY AND GEOLOGY. Ecosystem. Ecology & Geology Linkage. Fundamental Ecology Terms. Natural Service Functions of Ecosystems

Mangrove and Seagrass Restoration/Mitigation: Success and Failure and the Cost of Both. Presented by Laura L. Flynn

4-4 Aquatic Ecosystems

Climate Change and Chesapeake Bay Habitats

Wetlands Project Guidance

Ch. 7 Aquatic Ecology

POLICY FOR NATURAL RESOURCE MANAGEMENT AREAS

Aquatic Communities Aquatic communities can be classified as freshwater

Final Report of the Riparian Forest Buffer Panel

AUTECOLOGY Step One:

Floodplain Forest Restoration: Progress, lessons learned, and new science from the Connecticut River Watershed

WONDERFUL, WATERFUL WETLANDS

Meacham Creek Restoration Project

Chapter 18 Conservation of Biodiversity. Tuesday, April 17, 18

Chapter 5 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

Beverly. Produced in This report and associated map provide information about important sites for biodiversity conservation in your area.

Case Studies III: Skokomish River Ecosystem Restoration Washington State

The Rapidly Evolving Science of Coastal Blue Carbon: What s Known and What Do We Want to Know

Oil Spills in Mangroves

Habitat Evaluation Scoring Method to Estimate Ecosystem Service Improvements from Restoration. Timothy Barber, Jennifer Lyndall, and Wendy Mahaney

Watershed master planning, City of Griffin, Georgia, USA

Transcription:

WETLAND SCIENCE AND PRACTICE VOL. 27, NO. 1 Two Shroom Pool Bob Upcavage

July 2009 SWS Research Brief No. 2009-0005 WSP Mangrove Field of Dreams: If We Build It, Will They Come? Background Mangrove forests are ecologically important coastal ecosystems composed of one or more of the 69 species of salt tolerant trees and shrubs. These ecosystems currently cover 146,530 square kilometers (1 km 2 = 247 acres) of the tropical shorelines of the world, which represents a decline from 198,000 km² of mangroves in 1980 to 157,630 km² in 1990. Thus, loss of mangrove area has occurred at a rate of 1 to 2 percent per year during the past three decades. Achieving no-net-loss of mangrove forests would therefore require a minimum of 150,000 hectares (1 ha = 2.47 acres) of successful mangrove forest restoration per year at the current rate of loss. The evidence for successful restoration of mangroves on any large scale, however, is nearly non-existent. For example, a recent report indicates that in spite of twenty years of efforts devoted to the restoration of 44,000 ha of mangroves in the Philippines, and the expenditure of $USD 17.6 million, the plantings experienced high mortality, and the few that survived had dismally stunted growth. This failure was attributed to two assumptions regarding restoration: 1) Mangroves can only be restored by planting and 2) Sub-tidal mud flats are suitable for planting, when in fact they likely never supported a mangrove forest in the first place. What works? The three images in Figure 1 illustrate the restoration of a portion of a 500 ha (1236 acres) mangrove forest restoration project in Hollywood, Florida, USA, within the Anne Kolb Nature Park. Figure 1. Example of a mangrove restoration project in Florida, USA. The interesting part of the story is that none of the mangroves you see were planted! They are all what we call volunteer mangroves (Fig. 2) ones that colonized the site on their own after appropriate biophysical conditions were established. Such conditions include appropriate tidal hydrology to support natural colonization by the millions of floating propagules (seeds or seedlings) of mangroves naturally produced in this area every year. A three year pilot project prior to this major restoration effort had established the target topographic elevation that would facilitate natural recruitment of mangroves. The construction of a tidal creek in the center of the project was essential to replicate the natural tidal creeks found in all mangrove forests and to allow for the movement of fish and invertebrates into and out of the forest as tidal levels rose and fell. A recent symposium on Mangroves as Fish Habitat documented the need for such waterways and the successful establishment of fish populations equivalent to control sites for this project area within five years of construction. Figure 2. Volunteer seedlings of red mangrove growing with a nurse species, Sesuvium portulacastrum. Natural recruitment of seedlings can revegetate a restoration site. (Photo courtesy of K. L. McKee) - Page 15 -

MANGROVE FOREST RESTORATION OFTEN FAILS DUE TO A LACK OF UNDERSTANDING OF MANGROVE HYDROLOGY Fish and Mangroves Two of the more important ecological functions of mangroves are the provision of direct food resources via a detrital food web and habitat for a wide variety of fish and invertebrates, which in turn are food resources for numerous species of wading and seabirds, reptiles (crocodiles), and mammals, including the rare Bengal tiger. Both commercial and recreationally important fish and invertebrate species may use mangrove forests both as juveniles and adults. Access to the flooded forest floor is provided by tidal channels and creeks, and these same creeks provide refuge on low tides or concentrate prey species for consumption by predators. Managing and restoring mangroves is thus not only about the vegetation, but also about the open water tidal creeks, ponds, mud flats, and salt flats, which are often not obviously vegetated. These are critical components of the mangrove forest ecosystem, and protection of mangrove forests should include adjacent creeks, flats and upland edge. Mangrove loss been accompanied by declines in fish and invertebrate harvests and associated declines in the larger animal species. Unfortunately, attempts at mangrove forest restoration often fail due to a lack of understanding of mangrove hydrology. Even if mangrove vegetation is established, habitat use by fish and invertebrates is not optimized due a lack of tidal creek design as part of the project. Figure 3. View of the sub-tidal portion of a mangrove forest along a tidal creek. Understanding Natural Recovery In addition to the need to understand the existing hydrology as it relates to topography of an adjacent mangrove forest reference area, it is also important to understand the natural recovery processes in damaged mangrove forest areas, also known as secondary succession. Figure 4. Freeze-damaged mangroves in Tampa Bay, Florida, USA. Just as a fallow field will eventually become a forest if left alone, damaged mangrove forests have the ability to revegetate under some circumstances. For example, periodic freeze events (Fig. 4) or hurricanes can damage forests. The natural secondary succession process in damaged mangrove forests often begins with the appearance of a nurse species (Fig. 2), which is typically herbaceous plant species such as Smooth Cordgrass, Spartina alterniflora, or Saltwort, Batis maritima. These species, which are associated with mangrove forests around the world, appear to facilitate the recolonization and eventual natural restoration of damaged mangrove areas. Although not well studied, facilitation may work by reducing stressful soil conditions and/or physical trapping of floating mangrove seeds. Such knowledge is important in planning and conducting mangrove restoration projects, because mimicking the natural secondary succession may lead to a more successful restoration in the long-run. When Extra Help is Needed At restoration sites prone to erosion after mangrove damage or loss, the use of a rapidly colonizing species like Smooth Cordgrass (Fig. 5) may quickly stabilize exposed sediments that might otherwise oxidize or erode away leaving the topography too low to support natural colonization by volunteer mangrove propagules. Figure 5. Herbaceous species can be used to stabilize soils and to promote mangrove recolonization. Some damaged mangrove forests may not have the natural ability to heal themselves. Several reports on hurricane damage in Florida and Honduras have noted that the natural secondary succession processes appear stalled. One of the explanations for this could be that older forests with mature trees can tolerate gradual sea level rise, but new seedlings find it difficult to deal with more frequent flooding on lower lying exposed soils. There is also the phenomenon of propagule limitation. Large areas of disturbance, such as the herbicide destruction of mangroves in Viet Nam, resulted in a lack of sufficient mangrove seed sources locally to provide for natural recolonization. As a result, local citizens were organized to plant seeds of Rhizophora apiculata collected from adjacent undamaged or naturally recovering forests within the Can Gio Mangrove Biosphere Reserve near Ho Chi Minh City. Concentrating on only one species of mangrove when 20-30 are common in these forests was a limiting factor in the success of this project, but natural recruitment of other species has occurred. Thus, successful mangrove forest restoration should be routinely successful if a few basic ecological restoration principles are applied at the early planning stages. - Page 16 -

Ecological Restoration Ecological Mangrove Restoration (EMR) is a proven six step methodology for designing and building a successful mangrove restoration project Teaching Ecological Mangrove Restoration Over the years I have seen many mistakes made in attempting to restore mangrove forests. Some of these were my projects and were the direct result of a lack of experience. Now that I can achieve routine success in restoring mangroves, I have felt it important to pass the principles I learned to younger practitioners of what we call ecological restoration. Andy Clewell in his new book, Ecological Restoration, defines the term as meaning the process of assisting the recovery of an impaired ecosystem. I would add that my definition emphasizes the restoration of all the components of the ecosystem: hydrology, soils, water quality, all the plant species and all the animal species. The emphasis on just planting a single mangrove species, for example, is not ecological restoration, even if it works. Thus has evolved a living process of assembling the information, teaching it, usually in a three day course, and asking students and other professionals to critique the proposed Ecological Mangrove Restoration process. My colleagues and I are now in our 53rd version of the teaching materials, largely PowerPoint images, and have distilled this information into a six step process. These steps are: 1. Understand both the autecology (individual species ecology) and the community ecology of the mangrove species at a particular location, in particular the patterns of reproduction, propagule (seeds and seedlings) distribution, and successful seedling establishment. 2. Understand the normal hydrologic patterns that control the distribution and successful establishment and growth of targeted mangrove species. 3. Work together with local communities to assess the modifications of the previous mangrove environment that occurred and that may prevent natural secondary succession. 4. Select appropriate mangrove restoration sites through application of steps 1-3 above that are both likely to succeed in restoring a sustainable mangrove forest ecosystem and are cost effective, given the available funds and labor. 5. Design the restoration program at appropriate sites selected in Step 4 to initially restore the appropriate hydrology and utilize natural recruitment of propagules or seeds for plant establishment unless otherwise determined likely not to succeed. 6. Only utilize actual planting of propagules, collected seedlings, or cultivated seedlings after determining through steps 1-5 that natural recruitment will not provide the quantity of mangroves desired (or the desired rate of stabilization or growth of seedlings ) established as quantitative goals for the project. Our courses always include a field component during which we inspect and often gather data about existing mangrove restoration projects and proposed sites for restoration. This is an essential part of our training courses, during which many of the lessons learned in class are applied in the field. These courses have been taught in the United States, Cuba, Nigeria, Thailand, India and Sri Lanka over the last decade and have received good acceptance by students and critical reviews that have been applied to improving the teaching content and the restoration process. - Page 17 -

Additional Information Lewis, RR.. 2005. Ecological engineering for successful management and restoration of mangrove forests. Ecological Engineering 24: 403-418. Lewis, RR, and R.G Gilmore. 2007. Important considerations to achieve successful mangrove forest restoration with optimum fish habitat. Bulletin of Marine Science 80: 823-837. Lewis, RR. 2009. Methods and criteria for successful mangrove forest restoration. Chapter 28., pages 787-800 in GME Perillo, E Wolanski, DR Cahoon, and MM Brinson (eds.), Coastal Wetlands: An Integrated Ecosystem Approach. Elsevier Press. McKee, K.L., J.E. Rooth, and I.C. Feller. 2007. Mangrove recruitment after forest disturbance is facilitated by herbaceous species common to the Caribbean Region. Ecological Applications 17: 1678-1693. Web Resources: www.mangroverestoration.com; www.mangroveactionproject.org About the Author: Roy R. Robin Lewis III is a wetlands ecologist and president of Lewis Environmental Services, Inc., located in Salt Springs, Florida. He has designed, permitted, and constructed more than 200 wetland restoration projects around the world during his 40 year career, teaches wetland restoration short courses at Ohio State University, and has been an instructor in wetlands restoration for the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers for 20 years, most recently at the Apalachicola National Estuarine Research Reserve. He is a Florida native and is currently working on the restoration of the Ocklawaha River located just two miles north of his home near Ocala, Florida. Contact Information: Roy R. Lewis III, P.O. Box 5430, Salt Springs, Florida, USA 32134. E-mail: lesrrl3@aol.com. Phone: 01.352.546.4842. Webpage: www.royrlewis3.com. Use of this Document Disclaimer: Any conclusions, opinions, or recommendations stated in this document are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the Society of Wetland Scientists. SWS accepts no responsibility or liability for any consequences arising from the use of such information. For more information about the SWS Research Brief, contact: Copyright: All materials published in SWS Research Briefs are protected by copyright. SWS grants permission to download this document for personal, non-commercial use. SWS does not grant the right to resell or redistribute any text, images, or graphics from this document. Users may not modify, publish, participate in the sale of, create derivative works from, or exploit any of the content without obtaining prior written authorization. To obtain permission to display or use any content of this document, please make a request for authorization by contacting SWS (www.sws.org). Karen L. McKee karenmckee1@me.com - Page 18 -