The Value of Distributed Photovoltaics to Austin Energy and the City of Austin

Similar documents
Cost-Benefit Analysis of the PSE&G Energy Efficiency Program 2014 Prospective

1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY. Executive Summary 1-1

Cost-benefit Analysis of the New Jersey Clean Energy Program Energy Efficiency Programs

The Value of Distributed Solar Electric Generation to New Jersey and Pennsylvania

Solar Photovoltaic Volumetric Incentive Program 2015 Report to the Legislative Assembly

RAC Policy Subcommittee Meeting Northeast Update: TRC Test Applied to CHP in MA & NY 26 January 2011

Increasing the Value of Customer-Owned PV Systems Using Batteries

The Value of Distributed Solar Electric Generation to San Antonio

Financial Impacts of Net-Metered PV on Utilities and Ratepayers: A Scoping Study of Two Prototypical U.S. Utilities

PACIFICORP: PRIVATE GENERATION RESOURCE ASSESSMENT FOR LONG TERM PLANNING

BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION OF OREGON. In February of 2015, the Oregon Public Utility Commission (OPUC) opened Docket No.

West Monroe Partners April 2017

Evaluating Costs of Energy Efficiency Programs

Cost-Benefit Analysis of the 2007 New Jersey Clean Energy Program Energy Efficiency Programs. Summary Report

An End User Perspective on the Cost of Solar Photovoltaic Energy Systems Installed by Commercial Organizations. Kenton D. Swift May 14, 2012

Acknowledgements... ACK-1

A TOOL TO MARKET CUSTOMER-SITED SMALL WIND SYSTEMS

La regulación del incierto futuro de los sistemas eléctricos

APPENDIX G: CONSERVATION RESOURCES AND DIRECT APPLICATION RENEWABLES

White Paper Analysis of Utility-Managed, On-Site Energy Storage in Minnesota

Jeremy Lawton Susac May 20,

2009 Power Smart Plan

Minnesota Value of Solar: Methodology

Draft Energy Efficiency Cost-Benefit Analysis Avoided Cost Assumptions. July 1, 2013

Advanced Modeling and Verification for High Penetration PV: Final Report

Demand-Side Management and Energy Efficiency in Florida

SOLAR VALUATION & COST/BENEFIT ANALYSES

PREPARED FOR: ARIZONA PUBLIC SERVICE Updated Solar PV Value Report

Understanding Utility Revenue and Customer Tariffs Impact of DPV Deployment: Thailand Case Study

Bundled Energy Solutions to Lower Operating Costs and Maximize ROI. Harvey Katzen Director of Bundled Energy Services ABM Building and Energy

An Economic Assessment of the Benefits of Storage in South Africa. by Jeremy Hargreaves, Energy & Environmental Economics

PV Valuation Methodology

BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION OF OREGON UM 1716

Summary of Net Metered Projects as of June 30, Small Net Metered Projects as of 6/30/2016 Small Group Host Projects as of 6/30/2016

IDYLWILDE PROJECT FEMA REIMBURSEMENT & POSSIBLE SOLAR PROJECT LOVELAND UTILITIES COMMISSION. July 16, 2014

ELECTRICITY GENERATION

Solar PV Capacity Additions Forecast for PJM States:

A Generalized Approach to Assessing the Rate Impacts of Net Energy Metering

Costs and Benefits of Combined Heat and Power

Energy Trust Electric and Gas Avoided Cost Update for Oregon for 2018 Measure and Program Planning

Welcome/Introductions Updates since last meeting/review of DSM program history Energy savings Demand savings Annual spend

Economic Analysis of Large Stationary Fuel Cell Value in California

The CSI Site. Research Studies. Value? Depends on who you are: How to Determine the Value of a Solar Investment

Independent Assessment of Conservation and Energy Efficiency Potential for Connecticut and the Southwest Connecticut Region FINAL REPORT June 2004

Incentivizing Solar Energy:

AEP Ohio. Combined Heat and Power (CHP) May 24 th, 2017 Steve Giles Vice President Alternative Energy Hull & Associates, Inc.

Value? Depends on who you are: The CSI Site

Client Name/Presentation Title

Through the Looking Glass and What the Analyst Found There: Energy Storage Behind the Meter

Self-Generation Incentive Program

Florida s Energy Efficiency Leader. Second Quarter Report

Distributed Energy and Net Metering Technical Conferences

Strategic Plan. Renewable Energy. July 23, 2014

Renewable Energy Plan 2011 Biennial Review Lansing Board of Water & Light MSCP Case No. U-16619

New Jersey s Clean Energy Program

An economic assessment of the benefits of storage in South Africa

Levelized Cost of New Generation Resources in the Annual Energy Outlook 2012

Energy Independent Community. an evaluation for

The Economic Potential for Energy Storage in Nevada

Beyond LCOE: The Value of CSP with Thermal Energy Storage

Wind Power Update. Larry Flowers NREL. January 15, 2002

Maine Distributed Solar Valuation Study

CHAPTER 3: RESOURCE STRATEGY

ECE 333 GREEN ELECTRIC ENERGY 15. PV ECONOMICS

Demand Side Management Programs

Senate Bill 350 Study

OVERVIEW & SUMMARY. Fig. 1: DG IV Categories

Integrated Resource Plan

CASE: UM 1910/1911/1912 WITNESS: BRITTANY ANDRUS PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION OF OREGON STAFF EXHIBIT 100

CHP, Waste Heat & District Energy

Montana-Dakota Utilities Co. A Division of MDU Resources Group, Inc. 400 N 4 th Street Bismarck, ND 58501

ELECTRIC COST OF SERVICE AND RATE DESIGN STUDY

DATA ASSUMPTIONS AND DESCRIPTION OF STUDIES TO BE PERFORMED 2014 EGSL & ELL Integrated Resource Plans

Metrus Energy & Energy Efficiency as a Service

2nd Edition. Exhibit KRR-2

Policy Decisions Behind GRU s Future Electric Power Supply Plan February 16, 2012 Ed Regan

Please see response to Question 9 for information related to final TVA resource estimates.

Solar and Smart Grid Training Design, Installation, Business Saving Energy Together

AN ASSESSMENT OF ENERGY AND EMISSIONS PERFORMANCE OF BUILDINGS AT TEACHERS MUTUAL BANK LTD

MAXIMUM ACHIEVABLE POTENTIAL FOR GAS DSM IN UTAH FINAL REPORT JUNE Table of Contents

WEATHER-ADJUSTED PERFORMANCE GUARANTEES

Revised Overview of PV Inputs, Data Sources, and Potential Study Results

Solar Energy for Publicly Owned Treatment Works

Investigation into the Effectiveness of. Solar Programs in Oregon

Electricity Scenario Analysis. for the. Vermont Comprehensive Energy Plan 2011

Investigation into the Effectiveness of. Solar Programs in Oregon

Potential Impacts of a Renewable and Energy Efficiency Portfolio Standard in Kentucky

Focus on Energy s Biogas Feasibility Study Grants for Anaerobic Pretreatment and Anaerobic Digester Facilities

Cost of Service and Public Policy. Ted Kury Director of Energy Studies, PURC

Electrification and its Implications for the California Electricity System

Property Assessed Clean Energy (PACE) Financing in Ohio

Distributed Generation

L.D. Carter For USCSC

Renewable Energy ~ A Utility Perspective

Avoided Energy Costs in Maryland. Assessment of the Costs Avoided through Energy Efficiency and Conservation Measures in Maryland.

R15: Potential Study. Introduction. Introduction. Study Components 3/7/2016

Wind Energy. Evaluating the International Renewable Energy Market for the Creation of a Longstanding and Secure Energy Policy 12/29/10

Integrated Resource Plan Public Advisory Group

SGIPce 2014: Looking Under the Hood. January 13, 2016 George Simons Tom Mayer Jean Shelton, PhD Itron

2011 IRP Public Input Meeting. August 4, Pacific Power Rocky Mountain Power PacifiCorp Energy

Transcription:

The Value of Distributed Photovoltaics to Austin Energy and the City of Austin Electric Utility Commission Resource Management Commission June 26, 2006 Dr. Thomas E. Hoff 1

Clean Power Research Team Members Dr. Richard Perez Michael Kuhn Gerry Braun Benjamin Norris 2

Original Objectives Quantify the comprehensive value of distributed PV to AE in 2006 Document evaluation methodologies to assist AE in performing the analysis as conditions change and applying it to other technologies 3

Additional Objective Quantify the comprehensive value of distributed PV to AE in 2006 Document evaluation methodologies to assist AE in performing the analysis as conditions change and applying it to other technologies Produce a consensus/compromise-based estimate of the value of distributed PV to AE in 2006 4

Results Depend on Evaluation framework Values to quantify Methodologies Assumptions & Data 5

SOCIETAL Total Resource Cost (TRC) Industry Government Participant (PAC) Rate Impact Measure (RIM) Particpant All Ratepayers Utility Industry State/Local Gov. Federal Gov. Investment Equipment - + Installation - + Sales Tax - + O&M Cost - + Financing - + Electric Utility Bill + - Incentives Incentive Payments + - Program Administration - + + Tax Effects Tax Credits + - - Depreciation + - - Loan Interest Write-Off + - - O&M Costs + - - Utility Bill Savings - + + Tax on Tax Credits - + Utility Cost Savings Energy + Capacity + T&D System + Losses + Technology Synergies + + Environmental Emissions + Water + Health + RECs/Green Tags + + Job Creation - + + + Reliability Blackout Prevention + + + + Emergency Utility Dispatch + + Catastrophe Recovery + + + Backup Power + + + Risk Factors Manage Load Uncertainty + Wholesale Price Hedge + + + Retail Price Hedge + + + Retail Price Cap + - + + National Energy Security + + + 6

Benefits to be Included Energy production w/ natural gas price hedge Generation capacity T&D capacity deferrals Reduced transformer and line losses Environment 7

Benefits Evaluated but Not Included Reactive power control Benefit is insignificant Disaster recovery Disaster recovery benefit is signification but requires coupling with storage; AE recommended that the benefit be removed Technology synergies (PV + load control) Three capacity value methods were implemented; AE selected mid-range value 8

Benefits Explicitly Excluded Blackout Prevention AE decided to exclude this benefit because battery storage is separate technology from solar Emergency Utility Dispatch AE decided to exclude this benefit because battery storage is separate technology from solar Manage Load Uncertainty Benefit applies to T&D deferral and AE personnel estimated that only a small portion of the distribution capacity expansion plans have the potential to be deferred, thus making this benefit insignificant Retail Price Cap Benefit was large in other studies (e.g., NJ), but requires broader framework 9

Absolute PV Value Depends on Configuration $3,500 $3,000 $2,500 $2,000 $1,500 $1,000 $500 $0 PV System Value (present value - $/kw) Horizontal South 30º SW 30º West 30º West 45º 1-Axis 1-Axis 30º Energy Gen. Capacity Environment T&D Deferal Loss Savings 10

Per Unit PV Value is 11 per kwh $0.140 $0.120 $0.100 $0.080 $0.060 $0.040 $0.020 $0.000 PV System Value (levelized $/kwh) Horizontal South 30º SW 30º West 30º West 45º 1-Axis 1-Axis 30º Energy Gen. Capacity Environment T&D Deferal Loss Savings 11

Change Assumptions: PV Value = 21 per kwh Change the following assumptions: Include disaster recovery benefit Increase natural gas prices (years 6 to 30) by 30% Capture PV & load control technology synergy Escalate environment benefit 5% per year Value goes from 11 per kwh to 21 per kwh 12

Study Uses Assist in structuring an RFP Provide input into incentive design for customerowned systems Evaluate other PV applications Assist in evaluating new business opportunities (e.g., a fixed-price electricity offering) 13

Methodology Advances Applied method to capture natural gas price hedge benefit Demonstrated importance (and applied) marginal loss savings calculations Developed preliminary method to quantify disaster recovery benefit Developed method to convert non-firm resource (PV) into firm resource using technology synergies (PV + load control) 14

Study Enhancements Further investigate disaster recovery benefit Improve long-term natural gas price forecast Use PV in conjunction with load control Further evaluate T&D deferral potential Expand framework to include other benefits 15