International Evolution

Similar documents
Medicines Agency EMA & Biosimilar update: Trends from marketing authorisation applications, scientific advice procedures and policies

ACG Public Forum. Join ACG, the FDA, and EMA for a discussion on biosimilars and IBD. Monday, 12:45 pm 2:15 pm

Biosimilars Scientific Challenges and Implications

Niklas Ekman, PhD, Finland

Expectations for Analytical Characterisation in the Evaluation of Biosimilarity: A Regulator`s Perspective

<RENFLEXIS> <Ministry of Food and Drug Safety>

Requirements for demonstrating biosimilarity of monoclonal antibodies

What next? Manufacture the biosimilar product

Regulatory development of Biosimilars in Republic of Korea and IPRF Biosimilars Working Group Activities

An MHRA perspective on bioassays

An FDA Perspective on the Implementation of State-of-the-Art Analytical Methods for the Development of Therapeutic Proteins

Biosimilar regulation from a clinical point of view

Ph. Eur. monographs and biosimilars

Biological Activity / Potency

EU Update on Regulatory Developments

Welcome to the HPRA Biosimilar Information Evening for Healthcare Professionals HPRA Offices

Biologicals and biosimilars in the wind - what is new?

Antibody-Drug Conjugate Characterization and Quality Assurance

Analytical similarity: Lessons from the first US biosimilar

Biosimilar regulation in Republic of Korea and Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC) developments

The United States Pharmacopeia Strategy on Biotherapeutic Products Standards. Jaap Venema, Ph.D. Chief Science Officer & Chair, Council of Experts

Expectations for Bioassays - An Assessor s View

Similar biological medicinal product

CASSS CMC Strategy Forum Barcelona, Spain. EBE Satellite Session Comparability Concept Paper 21 st March 2011

FIFARMA Position: Transparency in regulatory decision making on the approval for biosimilar products

Assistant Professor Mohammad A Alsenaidy, MSc, PhD, Saudi Arabia

Professor Andrea Laslop, MD, Austria

An FDA perspective on the implementation of state-of-the-art analytical methods for therapeutic proteins

EGA s Perspective on the Draft Quality Guideline

Understanding the Similarity Exercise: The Basis for Biosimilar Acceptance

Biosimilar Monoclonal- a reality

Biosimilars 2016 Balancing Fast Uptake with Industry Sustainability. Dan Ionescu Head of Pricing and Market Access Sandoz Biopharmaceuticals

Comparability to establish Biosimilarity

NDA Advisory Services Ltd

Mass Spectrometry for Characterization of Monoclonal Antibodies: Regulatory Considerations

Assessment of Active Biopharmaceutical Ingredients Prior To and Following Removal of Interfering Excipients

Quality of biologicals

OBP s MARJORIE SHAPIRO ON ANALYTICAL SIMILARITY IN BIOSIMILAR APPROVAL

Biosimilar medicines rising to the cost challenge

WHO standards for regulatory evaluation of vaccines and biotherapeutic products current status and way forward

BIOPHARMACEUTICAL SERVICES

Biosimilar medicines rising to the cost challenge

Biosimilar medicines: practical EU experience and perspectives. 12 Sept 2017 Adrian van den Hoven, Director General, Medicines for Europe

for the development, characterization, and release of biopharmaceuticals PhD. Emilio Medina-Rivero Principal Scientist Analytical Development R&D

Quality attributes impacting immunogenicity of therapeutic proteins

The European Pharmacopoeia

Implications for Preclinical and Clinical Programs. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Oncology Business Unit June 2, 2011

Technical Challenges in the Development of Biosimilars. E. Morrey Atkinson, PhD Interphex May 1, 2012

Analysis of Protein Biopharmaceuticals

Develop A Highly Similar" Biosimilar Compound: Lessons Learnt

Methods to Determine the Binding of Bevacizumab to Fc receptors

Biosimilars in the EU

Important Considerations for the Introduction of Biosimilars in the U.S. Frank A. Scappaticci, MD, PhD

How much evidence is provided prior to approval? An updated systematic review of biosimilar applications in Europe

Clinical Evaluation and Interchangeability of Biotech Products and Biosimilars (a Clinical Pharmacists View)

Reference Standards to Support the Development of Biosimilars

Cancer Vanguard. An introduction to Biosimilars

Guideline on similar medicinal products containing somatropin. Draft agreed by BMWP March Adopted by CHMP for release for consultation May 2005

PLANNING FOR SUCCESS: A CMC STRATEGY FOR BIOSIMILARS

Biosimilars today and tomorrow

Biosimilars China Guideline. Dr Dr Michel Mikhail

EU health policy. Strategy for the pharmaceutical industry and biosimilars. Salvatore D'Acunto. DG Research. DG Internal Market. DG Health & Consumers

Vladimir Hanes, MD, USA

biosimilar medicines better access. better health. handbook medicines

Professor Ahmed H Al-jedai, PharmD, MBA, BCPS, FCCP, FAST, Saudi Arabia

In Vitro Glycoengineering - Its Application and Effect on IgG1

Case Study: A Phase-Driven Approach to the Development and Lifecycle Management of Potency Assays. Spring in New England!!!

Monoclonal antibody biosimilars: robustness of products vs clinical experience

FDA recommendations for comparability studies to support manufacturing changes. Joslyn Brunelle, PhD Office of Biotechnology Products OPQ/CDER/FDA

How are biosimilars assessed and approved?

ICH GCG ASEAN Training Workshop - ICH Q5C May 2011

The Present State and Future Outlook for Characterizing the Higher Order Structure (HOS) of Protein Drugs in the Biopharmaceutical Industry

Effectively utilizing Post Translational Modification analysis to fast track process development for Biosimilars

Regulation of Biosimilars in Canada

The Regulatory and Licensing Process. Dr Anne Cook, Biologicals Quality Assessor, MHRA

Biosimilars today or tomorrow?

ACG Public Forum. Join ACG, the FDA, and EMA for a discussion on biosimilars and IBD. Monday, 12:45 pm 2:15 pm

What do physicians expect from a new drug?

Policy considerations for originator and similar biotherapeutic products

Biosimilars. Their regulatory status and their use

Roche Position 1 on Similar Biotherapeutic Products Biosimilars

BIOSIMILARS A COMPLETE DEVELOPMENT PLATFORM

3D Structure of Biologics in a Convenient Immunoassay Format

BIOSIMILARS view from Slovak Medicine Regulatory Agency on topic

QbD approach and Regulatory Challenges in Europe

Identification of Critical Product Quality Attributes: Impact of Product Variants on Safety and Efficacy

Capillary Electrophoresis Compendial Applications

Guideline on similar biological medicinal products containing recombinant granulocyte-colony stimulating

Between Biosimilars and PRIME: EMA s report on regulatory trends and priorities for biopharmaceutical products

Formulary Considerations for Biosimilars in healthcare systems

Immunogenicity: Impact on the Design of Clinical Trials for Biosimilars

The Ludger GX-mAb Glycoprofiling Service High Throughput glycan analysis service of monoclonal antibodies (mabs) for drug developers and manufacturers

The EU Market Environment for Biosimilar Medicines

Regulations of Biologics in Taiwan

as they ordinarily would for a generic. This has been a key factor inhibiting biosimilar uptake.

Overview of Biologics (Including Biosimilars)

Quality, Safety and Efficacy of Follow-on Biologics

Update on the new immunogenicity guideline in the EU

Characterisation and Comparability of Biosimilars

The Role of Mass Spectrometry for Developing Biotherapeutics: Regulatory Perspectives

Transcription:

EMA Biosimilar update: International Regulatory Convergence Presented by: Peter Richardson, 29 April 2016 Head of Quality Office Specialised Scientific Disciplines Department, EMA An agency of the European Union Contents International Evolution EU Update: products & guidelines Transparency IPRF Biosimilar Working Group Quality characterisation Training / communication 1 1

Biosimilars: Surfing the wave 80 s : rdna insulin 90 s : Comparability guidelines 00 s : EU + WHO Biosimilar guidelines 2016 : Strong global interest in biosimilars 2 2016 Global implementation Major regions have developed and adopted guidelines to WHO standard (not all represented) 3 2

Biosimilars WHO international role ICDRA 2006 Implementation meetings - 2015: SBP Guideline review WHO guideline: very important tool to assist global convergence 4 Biosimilars / Similar Biotherapeutic Products Key learning during WHO implementation Biosimilar (SBP) Generic (not BE study or repeat of benefit / risk) Comparability v RBP (head to head required) Terminology important (e.g. not biogenerics) Quality is foundation of SBP (a key communication message) Biosimilarity: Stepwise approach (start with quality: Totality of Evidence) Experience has refined approach (efficient / science based data requirements) 5 3

Additional effort required (WHO Implementation) 6 International Pharmaceutical Regulators Forum Biosimilars Working Group (BWG) 7 4

Contents International Evolution EU Update: products & guidelines Transparency IPRF Biosimilar Working Group Quality characterisation Training / communication 8 General Guidelines: Guidelines for biosimilars Overarching Guideline (CHMP/437/04 Rev. 1) Guideline on Similar Biological Medicinal Products Non-clinical/clinical Guideline Quality Guideline Class-specific Guidelines: non-clinical/clinical aspects: Insulin Somatropin G-CSF Epoetin IFN-α LMWH mabs IFN-β Follitropin 2006 Rev. 2015 9 2006 2006 Revision ongoing 2006 Rev. 2010 2009 2009 2012 2013 2013 CP(RP): Jan16 Revision ongoing 5

EU Scientific advice for biosimilars 45 40 35 30 25 20 FU First 15 10 5 0 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Around 75% of scientific advice requests are for monoclonal antibodies 10 EU Biosimilar product review (Mar 2016) 44 MAAs submitted 31 MAAs reviewed 13 MAAs under review 2 Negative 22 Positive 7 Withdrawn Interferon alfa Insulin human 11 20 Valid MAs Somatropin (1) Epoetin (5) Etanercept (1) Filgrastim (8) Infliximab (2) Follitropin (2) Insulin glargine (1) Pre-authorisaton Insulin (6) Epoetin (1) 2 Withdrawn Post-authorisaton Filgrastim (1) Somatropin (1) Adalimumab (2) Enoxaparin sodium (2) Etanercept (1) Insulin glargine (1) PEG-filgrastim (3) Rituximab (1) Teriparatide (2) EC Decision Infliximab (1) 6

Business Pipeline Forecast and business intelligence businesspipeline@ema.europa.eu BP dialogue with companies - 50 + companies actively participating in the BP activity Internal discussion - Contributions to the EMA planning and reporting cycle Business intelligence - 20/25 BP meetings per year Forecast - increase in biosimilar MAAs in 2015: realised & continuing in 2016. 12 Immunogenicity Guideline: Workshop (9 March 2016) 13 http://www.ema.europa.eu/ema/index.jsp?curl=pages/news_and_events/events/2016/01/event_detail_001257.jsp&mid=wc0b01ac058004d5c3 7

Statistical methodology for quality comparability 14 Contents International Evolution EU Update: products & Guidelines Transparency: IPRF Biosimilar Working Group Quality characterisation Training / communication 15 8

IPRF: Biosimilar Working Group Chair: Yeowon Sohn (Younjoo Park) MFDS; Co-chair: Peter Richardson EMA 3 rd Face-to-Face meeting: 27 th June 2016. Work plan and mandate adopted ICH June 2015 - Public Assessment Summary Information for Biosimilars (PASIB) - Reflection paper Synergy with WHO Training 16 PASIB PASIB : Aim is to increase transparency Concise summary of the review of a biosimilar application in a common language (e.g. English) PASIB is an optional tool and has been designed to reduce local translation effort by the NRA Template + Guidance + 4 examples 17 9

IPRF BWG - PASIB 18 PASIB 19 10

PASIB PASIB : Can be used for lifecycle NRA may ask applicant to compile data (optional): NRA to decide how to use NRA compiles review summary and controls final document NRA free to compile as required IPRF encourage consistency and transparency Aim for < 10 pages 20 PASIB Remsima (EMA) 21 11

Availability of PASIB Aim is to provide directory via IPRF website PASIB: local NRA EPAR (EU) Other Assessment Report formats 22 http://www.mfds.go.kr/index.do?x=0&searchkey=product_nm&mid=1176&searchword=%ed%97%88%ec%a5%ac%eb%a7%88&cd=191&y=0&pageno=1&seq=19725&cmd=v Contents International Evolution EU Update: products & guidelines Transparency: IPRF Biosimilar Working Group Quality characterisation Training / communication 23 12

Transparency Quality aspects Substantial increase in transparency for quality aspects relating to biosimilars, e.g. PASIB EPAR FDA Advisory Committee EU examples 24 PASIB Herzuma, quality part (MFDS) 25 13

Benepali EPAR: Quality characterisation 26 FDA - Arthritis Advisory Committee Meeting: CTP-13, February 9, 2016 http://www.fda.gov/advisorycommittees/calendar/ucm481969.htm 27 14

Biosimilar mabs - physical-chemical methods Biosimilar example / function Example 1 Example 2 Characterisation AS specifications ESI-MS (mass, glycation) Peptide map (MS/MS / Peptide map (MS/MS / HPLC) N-terminal / C-terminal sequencing MS Disulphide bonds / Free thiol analysis FTIR / CD DSC (thermal stability) SEC-HPLC CE-SDS (purity) IEF (charge heterogeneity) IEC-HPLC LC-MS/ UV HPAEC-PAD (Oligosaccharide, monosaccharide, Sialic acid content) Identity (IEF) Identity/Purity (IEC-HPLC) Purity reduced/non-reduced (CE-SDS) Purity(SEC-HPLC) Content (UV) Oligosaccharide profiling (Bio-LC) MS (mass) Peptide map (LC-MS) N- / C-terminal sequence (peptide map) Disulphide bonds / Free thiol analysis (FLP) Methionine oxidation (LC-MS) Deamidation (LC-MS) N- glycan profile (LC-ESI-MS/MS, HILIC-UPLC) N-linked glycosylation site analysis SEC-HPLC icief / CEX (charge heterogeneity) FTIR / CD / HDX-MS DSC (thermal stability) Aggregates (SEC/MALLS / SV-AUC) CE-SDS (purity) Protein size (DLS) UV Subvisible particles (MFI) Content (UV) Identity (icief) HMW (SEC) Non-reduced (CE-SDS) FP specifications 28 Particulate matter Content (UV) Identity (IEF) Purity(SEC-HPLC) Identity/Purity (IEC-HPLC) Purity reduced/non-reduced (CE-SDS) Particulate matter Content (UV) Identity (icief) HMW (SEC) Non-reduced (CE-SDS) Regulatory considerations on HOS V Jekerle Biosimilar mabs - biological methods Biosimilar example / function Example 1 Example 2 Characterisation Substrate binding affinity (SPR, ELISA) Fc binding (FcγRI, FcγRIIa, FcγRIIb, FcRn, FcγRIIIa/b) C1q binding (ELISA) Ex vivo cell binding Transmembrane substrate binding Substrate specificity In vitro neutralisation assay Substrate effect blockage (in vitro) Apoptosis (FACS) CDC ADCC Effector function in vitro Substrate binding affinity (FRET, FACS, SRP) 6 x Fc domain binding C1q binding (ELISA) In vitro assay (neutralisation) Apoptosis assay CDC ADCC Effector function in vitro Biological activity (cell-based disease model) Inhibitory apoptosis assay AS specifications In vitro assay (substrate neutralisation) Competitive inhibition (FRET) In vitro assay (neutralisation) FP specifications In vitro assay (substrate neutralisation) Competitive inhibition (FRET) In vitro assay (neutralisation) 29 Regulatory considerations on HOS V Jekerle 15

Contents International Evolution EU Update: products & guidelines Transparency IPRF Biosimilar Working Group Quality characterisation Training / Communication 30 European Medicines Regulatory Network (Regulator s view) 31 16

TRAINING - International Agency is proposing to run a training event for international regulators in 4Q 2016 Multiple requests from external NRAs and EU MS IPRF BWG identify training as a key aspect at this stage of biosimilars implementation Aim is also to complement WHO initiatives 32 EC communication: DG GROW Workshop - 06 Oct 2015 http://ec.europa.eu/growth/sectors/healthcare/competitiveness/corporate-responsibility/index_en.htm EC: yearly report on market access for biosimilars Yearly multi-stakeholder workshop Focus: Patients, Physicians, Payers 33 17

EC communication: DG GROW Workshop - 20 June 2016 = Patients & Physicians 34 EMA communication activities Agency is... Participating at Conferences particularly to communicate with patients / physicians, e.g. European Medical Societies Roundtable on Biosimilars, January 2016 EC Workshop : June 2016 35 18

Thank you for your attention Peter Richardson, Head of Quality Office Specialised Scientific Disciplines Department, EMA peter.richardson@ema.europa.eu 36 19