Waste Audit : Executive Summary

Similar documents
LABORATORY 8: WASTE AND RECYCLING AT PLU Due November 7 th or 9 th

WASTE REDUCTION AND DIVERSION STRATEGY

UNIVERSITY of HOUSTON MANUAL OF ADMINISTRATIVE POLICIES AND PROCEDURES

GREEN EVENTS CERTIFICATION + RECYCLING FACILITATOR

ORANGE COUNTY WASTE COMPOSITION STUDY

3 rd Annual Waste Audit Results

Ministry of the Environment Waste Form Report of a Waste Reduction Work Plan Industrial, Commercial and Institutional Establishments

WASTE AUDIT AND INVENTORY

California State University, Chico Campus Conservation Committee

Approved University Standards Indoor Bins and Signs for Recycling, Trash and Compost. Last updated by Joe Abraham on

WHAT HAPPENS AFTER 75% RECYCLING GOAL? 2015 HDR, Inc., all rights reserved.

RECYCLING & TRASH REPORT FY 2015

Problem: Lack of Outdoor Campus Recycling Bins

Recycling and Zero Waste

Master Recycler Training Intro

Garbage on the. Prepared by The UNF Environmental Center Annual Report Jacksonville, FL / October 2015

Mapping Solid Waste I Roadmap for Data Collection

College Solid Waste Reduction and Recycling Policy

A Guide to Waste Reduction, Recycling & Composting in the Food Service Industry RRFB

Economic Impact of Recycling in Alabama and Opportunities for Growth. Alabama Department of Environmental Management. Land Division Solid Waste Branch

PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA 2014 WASTE CHARACTERIZATION STUDY

2012 Grant Application

Tompkins County Solid Waste Management Plan Executive Summary

UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE KNOXVILLE ZERO WASTE ATLAS CAMPUS ASSESSMENT 2018

City of Dallas Zero Waste Plan: Multi-family/Commercial Update

Standard Operating Procedure: Waste Management

A Philadelphia Guide to Zero Waste Events

Charrette Small Group Session Friday, January :30 am 12:00 pm

RECYCLING & TRASH REPORT FY 2017

City of Kingston Information Report to Council Report Number

Measuring Composition and Contamination at the MRF

60% Waste Diversion by 2020

Purchasing & Waste Management

RECYCLING & TRASH REPORT FY 2016

College of Public Health Building Waste and Recycling Audit

Plastics Recycling: Tools to Collect for Value. Tonya Randell Moore Recycling Associates NRRA Conference May 16, 2016

Waste Disposal and Diversion Findings for Selected Industry Groups

Background. What is a bale?

WASTE MANAGEMENT: Part 6

2015 SOLID WASTE ANNUAL REPORT

Contents. McMaster University Waste Audit Report. Introduction.3 Terminology.5 Current Collection Procedure...6 Methodology..8. Composition Study 10

Sustainable NREL. Waste Management and Pollution Prevention. Ellen Fortier. September 18, 2013

Green Events Certification

Banff Centre Waste Audit Program: Spring 2005 Results

Quick Service Restaurant Waste Composition Study

CITY CLERK. Blue Box Residue and Recycling of Coloured Glass

Reduce, Reuse, Recycle. Lesson Plan: NRES G1-1

WASTE AUDIT REPORT. The Banff Centre. Banff National Park, AB. Prepared by: IRIS Environmental Systems Inc. Banff, Alberta

Extended Producer Responsibility

Iowa State University Ames, Iowa Waste Reduction

2010 Residential Waste Stream Composition Study Results. Seattle Public Utilities and Neighborhoods Committee March 8, 2011

RECYCLING CENTER FEASIBILITY STUDY

APPENDIX A. Recommendations

Draft Rate Application. Funding the SF Recycling Program and Pursuing Zero Waste by 2020

City of Edmonton Waste Services Public Engagement Non-residential Online Survey

EPA s Proposed Rule Subpart K - Standards Applicable to Academic Laboratories. EPA regulatory updates for college campuses

Module 2: Solid Waste Reduction

Module 2.1 Pollution Prevention

Volume to Weight Conversion Ratios for Commercial Office Waste in New York City

Responses to Stewardship Ontario Questions in Module 2 Workbook

Campus Conservation Committee Waste Reduction Recommendations Report. Committee Members:

PSU Urban Center Building

Guidelines for Eco-Friendly Volunteering

Conducting a Waste Audit on Campus

SWANA RECYCLING TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE STUDY SPRINGETTSBURY EVALUATION OF COMMERCIAL RECYCLING PROGRAM AND ALTERNATIVES

WASTE AUDIT RESULTS AND WASTE REDUCTION WORKPLAN

Ministry of the Environment Waste Form Report of a Waste Audit Industrial, Commercial and Institutional Establishments

CT Recycling Laws & Regulations Connecticut Department of. Energy and Environmental Protection

Green Waste Management Through Composting at Cal State Dominguez Hills

Recycling Plan Element Borough of Highlands, County of Monmouth October 2004 RECYCLING PLAN ELEMENT HIGHLANDSNJ.US

SUMMERFOLK FESTIVAL WASTE AUDIT REPORT 2018

1.0 Explore alternative methods for recovery of designated materials Examine diversion of additional materials at the public drop off depot

A Waste Recycling Plan for. The Township of North Glengarry

University of Washington

ZERO WASTE CONCORDIA PROGRAM

Augsburg College Minneapolis, Minnesota Organics Collection

Calculating PPP Recovery Rates

Multifamily Recycling in Snohomish and King County WUTC Areas: Pilot Projects Brainstorming and Development Work Session.

Zero Waste Implementation Plan August 25 th, 2010

Solid Waste Management in Florida

STRATEGY 1 Increase composting by county employees to achieve 85% waste diversion; continue education about including soiled paper in compost stream

WHO NEEDS TO KNOW THIS PROGRAM All NYU employees that generate, handle or transport RMW should be familiar with this written program.

DUKE UNIVERSITY CONSTRUCTION & DESIGN STANDARDS

Compliance Bulletin Hazardous Waste Management of Electronics Waste reviewed/revised June 2003

Municipal Solid Waste Generation, Recycling, and Disposal in the United States: Facts and Figures for 2008

GREEN BUSINESS CERTIFICATION - SCORE CARD

VISION 20/20 JOURNEY IN SUSTAINABILITY

Sustainability: Investing in the Future of Texas. Linking Waste Management to Wellness

SUSTAINABILITY. Ohio State Sustainability Fund FY 2017 ANNUAL REPORT

Contents. No table of contents entries found.

2016 Waste Management Benchmarking and Performance Monitoring Report

1.1 Airport Recycling, Reuse, and Waste Reduction Plan Background Baseline Assessment... 2

How Communities Divert Food Waste to Feed the Food Insecure Missy Hall Staff Engineer, Sustainable Food Program Technical Co-Lead March 1, 2018

Assessment Tools and Case Studies 1: Solid Waste Audit

Part 1 Educational, Environmental and Economic Benefits

2015 Waste Management Benchmarking and Performance Monitoring Report

SPREAD THE WORD: Use the Bin! Morgan White

CIF City of Kingston. P&E Initiatives for Plastic Packaging Recovery. Final Project Report, April 29, 2014.

A Waste Recycling Strategy for County of Brant Final. July Prepared by:

The Sustainability Scene Sharing Knowledge & Insight With The ACUHO-I Community

Transcription:

Waste Audit : Executive Summary Students Sort Trash and Recyclables During Earth Week 2013 Office of Sustainability 1 Compiled by: Jennifer Maxwell Published: Spring 2014

Introduction Consistent with the zero waste commitment, Appalachian State University has completed the comprehensive waste audit on campus, and has identified a need to reimagine our waste stream management. In the past, we have been equipped to handle a system designed to send most of our waste to the landfill, but in recent years we have seen a natural shift in waste diversion capability. While Appalachian has designed for landfill trash removal in the past, we are now identifying more opportunities to reuse, recycle, and compost in order to divert our waste from the landfill. This is not a result of poor planning or execution on our part, but rather there have been innovations around recycling and composting that contribute to more sustainable waste management solutions. We have the potential to divert over 88% of our total waste stream through existing measures by rethinking the way we handle our waste. This is not something that will happen immediately, but it will be a multi-year effort that requires creative thinking and thoughtful collaboration. We need to be careful to consider the resources needed to support zero waste. Purpose, Scope and Methodology In April 2013, Appalachian State University contracted Kessler Consulting, Inc. (KCI) to conduct an audit of the landfilled solid and hazardous wastes generated on campus. This audit reported data from the assessment and measurement of municipal solid waste and hazardous waste generated on Appalachian s campus. In regards to the municipal solid waste, it is very important to note that this represents the landfilled waste stream, and does not include the materials we currently divert on campus through reuse, recycling, and composting. Through the current efforts, the university diverts 43% of our overall waste stream, a 13% increase from the previous fiscal year 11-12. The objective of the Solid Waste Audit (SWA) was to determine the composition of the landfilled solid waste stream generated in the academic, Kessler Associates Sorting Landfill Waste Into Material Categories 2

auxiliary, and residential areas of campus. Appalachian s Office of Sustainability, Physical Plant, and University Housing staff identified 32 campus buildings, with a total of 45 distinct areas of campus, for inclusion in the audit. The SWA consisted of the sampling and sorting solid waste (landfill) from these areas of campus to determine the types and quantities of recoverable materials currently being landfilled. Ninety one samples were collected and sorted over the twoweek period of April 15 to 26, 2013. The objective of the Hazardous Waste Audit (HWA) was to evaluate the handling, storage, and disposal practices for hazardous waste materials. Appalachian s Environmental Health, Safety, and Emergency Management and Office of Sustainability staff identified locations where hazardous wastes were being generated and stored. The HWA established a benchmark of Appalachian s compliance with United State Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources (DENR) regulations pertaining to hazardous waste generators. The HWA entailed inspections of the locations where hazardous wastes were being generated and stored. Inspections of a representative number of laboratories were performed on April 15 and April 17, 2013. Landfilled Waste Stream Overview For the SWA, Kessler Consulting, Inc. presents the findings in seven different building categories as listed below: Academic Buildings Residence Halls Student Union Sports and Recreation Central Dining Physical Plant Other Campus Locations The results were classified into four material categories: program recyclables, other recyclables, compostable materials, and all other materials. Program recyclables are recyclables accepted in Appalachian s existing single stream recycling program. Other recyclables are items that Appalachian also has other programs in place to capture. Compostable materials are organic materials that are able to be composted including food waste, landscape waste, compostable paper products, and other organics. All other materials are not recyclable or compostable and are classified as landfill for the purpose of this report. 3

The following chart shows the various material categories of waste separation for purposes of the waste sort. Program Recyclables Other Recyclables Compostables Landfill Recyclable Glass Laboratory Glass Compostable Paper Other Non-Rec. Glass Aluminum Cans Other Ferrous Metals Food Waste Non-Compostable Paper Steel or Tin Cans Other Non-Ferrous Metals Yard Waste Plastic Bags and Film Corrugated Cardboard Rigid Plastics Clean Wood Waste Styrofoam (food service) Office Paper Electronic Waste Other Rec. Org. Waste Styrofoam (packaging) Newspaper Technotrash All Other Plastics Magazines White Goods/Small Apps. Treated Wood Waste Books Textiles/Clothing Other Recyclable Paper All Furniture Aseptic Containers Tires/Rubber PET Plastic Cont. (SP#1) Special Waste HDPE Plastic Cont. (SP#2) Construction Waste Plastic Cont. (SP#3-#7) All Other Garbage Liquids Grit Solid Waste Opportunities Appalachian has an extensive recycling program in place and installed a new composting facility in 2011. Through these efforts, the University has continued to see an increase in our overall diversion rate. The purpose of the SWA was to establish a baseline of the current program and to identify opportunities for future program expansion. The audit revealed that the majority of the waste currently landfilled on the Appalachian campus could potentially be recycled or composted. The data from this study not only benchmarks current waste generation, but also provides the foundation on which to develop future waste reduction and recycling systems that will enable the University to navigate the path toward Zero Waste. OUR DIVERSION OPPORTUNITIES The following graphs display diversion potentials in the recycling and composting areas based on current total campus landfill waste stream data. Since the audit was conducted, plastic bags and film are now accepted into our recycling program so these have been added to the recycling category. 4

MEASURED WASTE STREAM COMPOSITION BUILDING CATEGORY MEASURED WASTE STREAM COMPOSITION (April 2013) ESTIMATED % OF WASTE STREAM recycle compost landfill % OF TOTAL Academic Buildings 33.0% 42.4% 24.6% 5.0% Residence Halls 43.1% 34.7% 22.2% 70.0% Student Union 34.1% 48.0% 17.9% 1.0% Sports and Recreation 40.0% 39.5% 20.5% 2.0% Central Dining 25.6% 62.9% 11.5% 20.0% Physical Plant 48.8% 25.0% 26.2% 1.0% Other Campus Locations 31.1% 32.4% 36.5% 1.0% DIVERSION OPPORTUNITIES BASED ON % OF TOTAL WASTE STREAM BUILDING CATEGORY ESTIMATED % OF WASTE STREAM DIVERSION OPPORTUNITY (As % of total waste stream) % OF TOTAL recycle compost landfill Academic Buildings 5.0% 1.65% 2.12% 1.23% Residence Halls 70.0% 30.17% 24.29% 15.54% Student Union 1.0% 0.34% 0.48% 0.18% Sports and Recreation 2.0% 0.80% 0.79% 0.41% Central Dining 20.0% 5.12% 12.58% 2.30% Physical Plant 1.0% 0.49% 0.25% 0.26% Other Campus Locations 1.0% 0.31% 0.32% 0.37% TOTAL 38.88% 40.83% 20.29% 5

RECYCLING OPPORTUNITIES Approximately 38.88% of the total campus landfill waste stream is recyclable through the current recycling programs offered on Appalachian s campus. With this figure in mind, it is crucial that we enhance our current programs to ensure we capture all that should be recycled on campus. Based on this information here are some enhancement recommendations: Enhance education and outreach to ensure the campus is educated on the new single stream recycling program and the materials that can be included in this program. Engage students in the education and outreach process as peer to peer education is beneficial! Develop campus wide standards and color coding for recycling, composting, and landfill containers in order to eliminate confusion. The Office of Sustainability is currently working with Design and Construction on this project. Develop walkway recycling system to capture recycling on all areas of campus. Currently there are only 5 outdoor recycling containers, while the campus is filled with outdoor landfill bins. Ensure that all central waste stations have recycling and landfill containers. It is fundamental to have recycling and landfill containers co-located at each central waste station. Two of the building categories with the greatest immediate potential for increased recycling collection are: Residence Halls- capturing additional recycling from the residence halls would allow us to divert 30.17% of our total landfilled waste stream through current recycling programs Central Dining- capturing additional recycling from central dining would allow us to divert 5.12% of our total landfilled waste stream through current recycling programs COMPOSTING OPPORTUNITIES A comprehensive organics waste recovery and expanded composting program will need to be a key component of Appalachian s waste diversion system to achieve its Zero Waste goals. Approximately 40.83% of the total campus landfill waste stream is potentially compostable. As a University we do a wonderful job capturing the pre-consumer food waste so our biggest opportunity with waste diversion is to address post-consumer composting. The two areas with the greatest immediate potential are: Residence Halls- capturing compost from the residence halls would allow us to divert 24.29% of our total landfilled waste stream through composting Central Dining- capturing compost from central dining would allow us to divert 12.58% of our total landfilled waste stream through composting- in addition the waste from central dining has been pulped, so it is a wonderful medium for composting 6

Based on these percentages, the University should target these areas to pursue post-consumer composting collection. OVERALL WASTE STREAM POTENTIAL The following graphs display an overall waste stream analysis based on the current diversion data as of April 2013, projecting the potential for future diversion. OVERALL WASTE STREAM ANALYSIS RECYCLE COMPOST LANDFILL Current (April 2013) 37.0% 6.0% 57.0% Future Potential 59.2% 29.3% 11.6% Current vs. Potential Waste Stream Analysis 60.0% 59.2% 57.0% 50.0% 40.0% 30.0% 20.0% 10.0% 37.0% 6.0% 29.3% 11.6% Current (April 2013) Future Potential 0.0% RECYCLE COMPOST LANDFILL Based on the audit information provided on our landfill waste stream, along with the addition of the materials we already capture in our reuse, recycling, and composting programs, there is a potential for our waste diversion rate to be at 88.4%. CONSUMPTION-BASED WASTE REDUCTION OPPORTUNITIES The commitment to zero waste begins with the reduction of consumption and thoughtful purchasing decisions that promote responsibility toward our resources. In order to truly achieve zero waste, we must rethink wasteful and unnecessary purchasing. As a University we need to ensure that we are working together toward waste reduction by considering the commitment is all our operation decisions. 7

The university needs to support and continue to promote the use of reusables over disposables by considering: Offering reusable items in the food service and catering areas Expanding water bottle filling station options Reducing paper usage Eliminating the use of single use plastic bags in retail areas Rewarding the campus community for the use of reusable alternatives through incentive programs The University needs to work with all departments to ensure proper utilization of resources. In more than one location, there were instances of usable items such as paper towel and toilet paper rolls, athletic and medical tape, and garbage bags that were being landfilled despite their usability. It is vital to our commitment that we use our resources wisely. REUSE OPPORTUNITIES The University needs to consider reusability options in future decision making. Opportunities to develop free stores, free-cycle models, or campus trading options are a possibility on this campus. In addition, the surplus property department needs to be utilized to its fullest potential in order that campus community members take full advantage of these resources before they leave the campus. The University needs to continue to support policies and operational program changes that ensure environmentally preferable purchasing, limit packaging and disposables, and divert more materials from the landfill. Campus Waste Stream is Staged for Sorting @ Broyhill Hazardous Waste Findings Each building identified to participate in the Hazardous Waste Audit was inspected for compliance with Department of Environmental and Natural Resources (DENR) and Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) regulations. These regulations include the following: hazardous waste 8

determinations, labeling and management of containers, storage of waste, laboratory clean-out, training, tracking waste, and recordkeeping. The following findings were revealed by the audit: Appalachian is classified as a Conditionally Exempt Small Quantity Generator (CESQG), and is not required to meet many of the requirements for Small Quantity and Large Quantity Generators. The requirements of this classification are not to exceed the maximum hazardous waste generation accumulation quantity for a conditionally exempt generator, and to ensure that the waste is shipped to the proper facility. The University uses a private vendor to make the official hazardous waste determinations at the time of pickup; however, professors and graduate assistants are also constantly making determinations that materials are waste and in some instances being labeled as hazardous waste. Appalachian is meeting the standard for shipping waste to the proper facility; however, whether the University meets the maximum generation and accumulation quantities is uncertain. Currently Waste shipment manifests are kept on-site and are available for review. All manifest were properly signed by the University and the receiving facility. A set protocol does not exist for making the hazardous waste determinations, nor a tracking system of the determinations. Therefore, it is impossible to quantify the exact amount of waste on-site at any instance. There is no set protocol campus wide with regards to labeling of hazardous waste in laboratories. A set protocol does not exist for storage of waste in laboratories. Several labs had numerous chemicals that appeared to be hazardous waste stored haphazardly throughout the labs. There was no formal training for workers and students regarding the proper management of unwanted materials. 9

Hazardous Waste Opportunities The University needs to develop a designated position within the EHS and EM department who could train faculty and staff in the proper handling and management of hazardous waste and materials, update contingency plans and emergency procedures, and conduct weekly inspections of laboratories and non-academic buildings that generate and store waste. To ensure that the University maintains its status as a Conditionally Exempt Small Quantity Generator, it needs to do a better job in tracking the amount of waste being generated and stored on-site. It would be in the best interest of the University to properly manage any hazardous waste generated and follow the standards outlined in 40 CFR 262.200 through 262.216 (Subpart K), Alternative Requirements for Hazardous Waste Determination and Accumulation of Unwanted Material for Laboratories Owned by Eligible Academic Entities. During the solid waste audit, biomedical and potentially biohazard wastes were found in the regular solid waste stream. The University has a protocol for handling biohazard materials that is reviewed every three years by a Bio-Safety Committee. The procedures for proper disposal of blood, syringes, animal and human parts are in place, but should be strictly followed. There needs to be a removal schedule for radiological waste. The software being used by the University to track chemical purchases should significantly reduce the overstocking of chemicals used in various parts of the University, and could potentially be expanded to include a purchasing and waste module. For more information please contact Jen Maxwell at maxwelljb@appstate.edu or to view the complete audit report please visit: www.zerowaste.appstate.edu 10

Reader Notes: 11

Appalachian State University Office of Sustainability ASU Box 32161 Boone, NC 28608 828.262.2659 sustain.appstate.edu 12