Danube Facts and Figures. The Czech Republic (July 2007)

Similar documents
Promoting PES in the Danube Basin

Three visions of the Mississippi River

Danube Facts and Figures. Germany (July 2007)

Romania key input to the Second Assessment of Transboundary Rivers, Lakes and Groundwaters under the UNECE Water Convention Prut River Basin

A. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY. 1. Water status management. 1.1 Water status

Significant Water Management Issues in the Danube River Basin District - Summary

The Elbe River Basin: Preliminary evaluation of the answers. Janos J. Bogardi Executive Officer of GWSP


NATIONAL PLANNING WORKSHOP CZECH REPUBLIC

Assessment of Transboundary, Rivers, Lakes and Groundwaters in

United Nations Economic Commission for Europe Convention on the Protection and Use of Transboundary Watercourses and International Lakes

Morava River Basin - Slovakia

European Union Strategy for Danube Region and the implementation of the Water Framework Directive

WETLAND RESTORATION PROGRAMS IN THE PRUT RIVER BASIN

Legal Basis of Water Management in Austria

Hydromorphology in the Danube River Basin

Danube River Basin Management Plan

European Strategy for the Danube Region

International cooperation for transboundary water pollution control:

Water for life and livelihoods

River Restoration: a European picture

Matthias Zessner Institute for Water Quality, Resources and Waste Management Vienna University of Technology. Vienna University of Technology

Overview and highlights

Maitland Valley WATERSHED

The UNECE Water Convention: a framework for cooperation between EU and non-eu countries. Francesca Bernardini, Secretary, UNECE

Connecting Catchments with the Urban Nexus

The Blueprint and Council Conclusions:

Climate Change As a Major Challenge on the Way to Achieving Water-Related Millennium Development Goals. Elena Boyeva November 2009

Water for life and livelihoods

Integrated Water Resources Management

Long-term change of stream water quality as a consequence of watershed development and management

PREPARATION OF THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE FLOOD DIRECTIVE AT THE LEVEL OF THE RHINE DISTRICT

CLIMATE CHANGE ASSESSMENT (SUMMARY)

Chapter 6 Objective: Protect and Enhance the Environment

Lecture 1 Integrated water resources management and wetlands

Nutrients and Water Quality in the East Souris River Watershed

WATER RESOURCES MANAGEMENT IN THE DANUBE RIVER BASIN. Prof. Dr. Laszlo Vermes

1st Living Lakes Webinar

EF.DEL/39/07 21 May 2007

The Global Dimension of Change in River Basins

REPORT. Report No: 2013/0958 Prepared For: Natural Resources Committee Prepared By: Dean Olsen, Environmental Resource Scientist Date: 11 July 2013

Prut River Corridor Approach, achievements and results in the context of implementation the SEE River Project

9/4/2013 CHAPTER 4 ECOLOGY AND GEOLOGY. Ecosystem. Ecology & Geology Linkage. Fundamental Ecology Terms. Natural Service Functions of Ecosystems

Danube Facts and Figures. ROMANIA (April 2006)

PART 1. To: Scottish Consultation Authorities: PART 2

Water Cohesion Fund Czech Republic

These potential changes and their implications are outlined in Annex 1.

1 General questions on zone and catchment management plans

OurFuture. Protecting. March Ontario Provincial Plans and Conservation Authorities

Council Directive 91/271/EEC The National Programme for Municipal Waste Water Treatment

VI-1. The Water Cycle What is the water cycle? evaporate condenses surface runoff ground water

Grand River Conservation Authority

Supplemental Guide II-Delineations

Individual NWRM. Peak flow control structures

Charakteristics of the Lakes in Radunia River Catchment According to the EU Water Framework Directive

The implementation of the EU Water Framework Directive in Austria: Status as of March Hellmut Fleckseder / Wolfgang Stalzer

Classification of chemical status of rivers for water management planning in Lake VBrtsjarv catchment area, Estonia

Scientific Bulletin of Politehnica University of Timişoara. Transactions on HYDROTECHNICS

6. Hydrogeological zones and groundwater resources balance baseflow map of the Czech Republic. Jiri Sima

Implementation of the Water Framework Directive in the Czech Republic

Europe and Russia. Physical Geography

Guiding Principles on Sustainable Hydropower Development in the Danube River Basin

Support legislation that will protect the quantity of water in Lake Erie

SOURCES OF POLLUTION AS A HAZARD FOR RIVER ENVIRONMENT IN CASE OF FLOOD

Economic and Social Council

14 NATURAL HAZARDS Background Resource Management Issues

Water threats at river basin scale

Europe. At A Glance. Sites for Europe

Natural Water Retention Measures

Stormwater Management in Your Backyard: Stormwater 101

Water Quality and Ecosystem Services

Urban Waste Water Treatment Directive Drinking Water Directive, their relation to the Water Framework Directive, in a context of scarcity

ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT OF MUNICIPAL WATER AND WASTEWATER TARIFFS AND EFFLUENT CHARGES IN THE DANUBE RIVER BASIN.

Willow Brook Catchment Project

CONSTRUCTED WETLANDS OPPORTUNITIES FOR LOCAL AUTHORITIES

Jordan River Basin. Planning for the Future. Salt Lake County Watershed Symposium (August 11, 2011) Todd Stonely Utah Division of Water Resources

Implementation of the UWWTD in Austria. Ernst Überreiter

Functions and values of water. Cor de Jong WaterLand International, Wageningen

COMPREHENSIVE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STUDY & MANAGEMENT PLAN South Albion Bolton Community Plan Employment Needs & North Hill Commercial Lands Study

HUNGARIAN NATIONAL REPORT AND THE FOLLOWING IMPLEMENTATION OF EU WFD IN 2005

Environmental Resource Inventories. What are ERIs? Significance of information How to use them

Astana Water Action (AWA) Actions by HUNGARY

Water Framework Directive*

Comments on CNR s report for the Government of Laos on the Xayaburi Dam June 2012

ENVIRONMENTAL ASPECTS OF INTEGRATED FLOOD MANAGEMENT

MURPHY DRAIN CATCHMENT

Properties of Water. Their shapes change when they are in different containers. Their volumes stay the same in any container.

AQUACROSS Project. Danube case study - storylines. Activities in the Danube case study 13/09/17

Branch of Hydraulics, Hydrology and Hydrogeology

Findings from a pan- European assessment of transboundary waters under the UNECE Water Convention Dr. Annukka Lipponen Coordinator of the Assessment

Requires Member States to take actions to mitigate the effects of floods and droughts.

Water Resources Management in Bhutan. G.Karma Chhopel

Contact zones of the Amur River basin: Landscape structure, Land cover and Anthropogenic influence

HarmoniRiB River Basin Data Documentation Chapter 2 - Svratka River Basin November 2006

CONSCISE SUMMARY OF A PROPOSAL OF THE ODRA RIVER BASIN DISTRICT PLAN

DRAFT RIVER MANAGEMENT PLAN

Chapter Four: Overview. Introduction to Environmental Geology, 5e. Case History: Endangered Trout. Ecology and Geology Linkage

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE

10: Water resource management

Annex. Suggestion for EC GIG

Transcription:

Danube Facts and Figures The (July 2007) General Overview The is situated at the roof of Europe, and its waters are drained through rivers into three different seas. The major part of the territory is drained by the Elbe and Oder Rivers to the North and Baltic Seas. The Morava River drains 21,688 km² to the Danube River almost 28 % of the Czech territory and 2.9 % of the Danube River Basin. Approximately 2.8 million inhabitants around 3.46 % of the population in the Danube River Basin live in this area. The signed and ratified the Danube River Protection Convention in 1995. Topography The is largely a highland country formed in the northwest by the Bohemian Massif, in the east by a bend of the Beskyds and Carpathian Mountains and in the south by plateaus and the Pannonian Plain. Approximately 7 % of the Morava River Basin is formed by mountains, 35% by highlands, 51% by plains, plateaus and valleys, and lowlands cover 7% of the area. The gradient of the upstream section of the Morava River is approximately 4, in the middle section around 0.2 and about 0.1 in the downstream reach. Precipitation, climate and water flow The average annual precipitation in the Czech part of the Morava River Basin is 635 mm, while in the mountainous areas it is higher up to 1,200 mm per year. The climate of the Morava River Basin is continental, with the lowest temperatures occurring in January and the highest in July. The average water flow in the Morava River above the confluence with its largest tributary - the Dyje River - is 65.0m 3.s -1 ; average flow below the confluence is 108.5 m 3.s -1. The average uninfluenced 100-year flow in the Morava River upstream from the confluence with the Dyje River is 792 m 3.s -1, while in the Dyje River upstream confluence with Morava it is 897 m 3.s -1. Land use and settlements The Morava River Basin in the has a high population density, 137 inhabitants per square kilometre, and land use is considerably determined by its topographical conditions. Agricultural land covers about 60 % of the area, forests 32 % and urbanised areas 1.5 %. Major cities in the area are the industrial and

trade fair town of Brno (390,000 inhabitants) and the historical town of Olomouc (160,000 inhabitants), both roughly situated in the central part of the basin on the confluence of rivers. Other important settlements are found near the Morava River (Sumperk, Kromeriz, Prostejov, Prerov, Otrokovice, Zlin, Uherske Hradiste, Hodonin), or along the lower run of the Dyje River (Znojmo, Breclav). Selected natural highlights on rivers and lakes The Morava River floodplain forms part of the ECONET European bio-corridor. Corridors in the floodplains along the Dyje and Jihlava Rivers and along the Svratka River upstream from Brno and the Trebuvka River valley also have a cross-regional character. The most important protected area in the Czech part of the basin is the bilateral Podyji-Thayatal National Park. It represents an exceptionally well-preserved pattern of river valley countryside in the upland part of Europe. Together with the Austrian part they form a unique bilateral area of European importance. Though it is the smallest national park in the, the Dyje canyon creates a unique river phenomenon with deep meanders and high diversity of animal and plant species, including 18 kinds of orchids. The national nature reserve Lednicke rybniky, belonging to the oldest pond systems in the Morava Basin, is preserved as a bird sanctuary and is an important transboundary wetland. In the first half of the 19 th century the pond banks (together with other arrangements) were altered, giving birth to the unique countryside park. This area of five large ponds, preserved since 1953 as breeding grounds, also serves as landing and crossroads areas for water birds in their yearly flights. The protected landscape area Litovelske Pomoravi, situated in the upper part of the Morava River run, is an important preserved area of the river basin. Meanders created by the Morava River generate the typical nature of the countryside, where the mosaic of ecosystems of rivers, meanders, periodical pools, wetlands, fans, grass communities and different types of alluvial forests form a unique structure of an alluvial plain. Human uses of water and water bodies Flood and torrent management, landslides Issues of erosion and flooding over the past one hundred years have mostly affected local areas with little transboundary effect. These conditions and impacts have been significantly changed after severe flood events in 1997 and 2002, and flood protection now plays an important role in risk management. An area of about 1,000 km 2 is exposed to the hazard of 100-year floods in the Morava River Basin. More than 181,000 people in 625 municipalities live in this area, representing about 6.5 % of inhabitants living in the basin.

Use of hydroelectric power Due to the prevailing low gradient and flow in rivers, the has a low hydro energy potential and therefore only about 4% of energy production is generated by hydro-power plants. There are two larger pumped storage hydropower plants in the Morava River Basin (Dlouhe Strane, Dalesice) and about 25 constant load hydro-power plants. Energy production potential is exhausted in this area; its further development requires investment into more efficient technologies. Navigation Waterways in the Morava River Basin do not meet the requirements for international navigation in the Danube River Basin. There are only small navigation activities in the area of the Brno and Vranov Reservoirs and the Bata Channel along the Morava River intended for recreational purposes. Rivers as receiving waters for effluents Due to the highly developed industry and agriculture in the Czech part of the Morava River basin, rivers in the region serve as recipients of both urban and industrial waste water effluents. They also transport diffuse pollution loads, containing organic matters and nutrients originating chiefly in agriculture. Together with low flows in rivers, this poses higher requirements on the quality of discharged waste water, and the whole basin has been declared as a sensitive area. Use of groundwater bodies: drinking water supply Due to the geological structure, the groundwater capacity of the Morava River Basin is low and the water-bearing Quaternary Sediments cover only a small part of the territory along the main watercourses. Approximately 90 % of groundwater is used for drinking water supplies. About 78 % of the total groundwater reserves have already been utilised and for their protection, 36% of the Morava River Basin has been designated a vulnerable area. Pressures on surface and groundwater bodies Sewerage and organic pollution Most of the organic pollution is discharged from municipalities. In the Czech part of the Danube River Basin there are about 1,800 municipalities and approximately 79 % of inhabitants are connected to wastewater treatment plants. All municipalities with a wastewater treatment plant capacity of more than 5,000 population equivalents have been equipped with effective reduction of organic pollution. Municipal sources account for almost 87 % of 1,002 registered sources of organic pollution. As the has undertaken obligations to meet the EU Urban Wastewater Treatment Directive by the end of 2010, measures aimed at improving the efficiency of wastewater treatment plants are underway.

Nutrient discharge i) Point source discharges: Present attention is focused on implementing the EU Urban Wastewater Treatment Directive. The scheduled intensification of wastewater treatment plants with a capacity of more than ten thousand population equivalents have been almost realised, and some plants are already in trial operation processes. In recent years, efforts were concentrated on agglomerations with a capacity of more than two thousand population equivalents. Reconstruction or completion of collection systems has begun in many agglomerations. Emissions estimated from registered point sources represent 2.7 kt/y of inorganic nitrogen and 0.3 kt/y of total phosphorus and is continuing to decrease slightly. Problems caused by the wide use of phosphate detergents were addressed by the Detergent Regulation, which specified two deadlines in 2006. According to expert estimates, the percentage of phosphorus discharged into surface waters could be reduced by 12-15 % in comparison with 2007. ii) Diffuse discharges: Agriculture is the biggest source of nutrients and contributes more than 65 % of the total load of nitrogen emissions into surface waters. Agriculture also contributes 30 % of the total rate for phosphorus. Several important measures have been implemented to improve the situation: rehabilitating watercourses, increasing protection of existing waters and wetlands and ending unfavourable agricultural practices. Priority substances Among other requirements, the new legal obligation set emission standards for industrial wastewater discharges based on the recommendations of best available techniques. In the basin there are approximately 300 industrial units registered as discharging into surface waters, about 100 of these handle priority substances. Heavy metals from engineering industrial plants are the most significant pollution concerns. A list of dangerous chemical pollutants prohibited on the market or with limited use in the is defined by updated legislative tools. The actual occurrence and discharge of priority pollutants is currently monitored. Impacts on surface and groundwater bodies Impacts from organic pollution, nutrients and hazardous substances (based on the Year 2004 National Analysis for Water Framework Directive implementation). i) Surface water bodies: 301 water bodies identified in the Morava River basin in categories of rivers and lakes were assessed ecologically and chemically. A summary of the assessment results are given in the following table: Assessment At risk Possibly at risk Without risk

according to Ecological status Nb. 59 205 37 % 20 68 12 Chemical status Nb. 59 137 105 % 20 46 34 Total assessment Nb. 92 173 36 % 31 57 12 ii) Groundwater bodies: In the Danube River Basin in the, 40 groundwater bodies have been identified. Of these, 21 are considered at risk and 19 not at risk. Quantitative status is the reason for at risk status in 7 % of the area, chemical status in 14 % and assessment as not at risk in 82 % of the area. Point sources of pollution account for 51% of the stresses, diffuse sources of pollution for 31% and 18 % of the stresses is from their combination or other pollution sources. Priority pollutants cause 24 % of risk assessment, nutrients 38 % and the rest by point sources of pollution. Impacts from hydro-morphological alterations (based on the Year 2004 National Analysis for Water Framework Directive implementation, including the initial classification of heavily modified water bodies). The most significant activities which may cause morphological alternation have been identified: significant flow regulations; hydropower generation; water abstraction for urban, industrial and agricultural uses and flood defence measures. The impacts of morphological alternation to water bodies, especially including the straightening of rivers, backwaters and diagonal obstacles (there are 2,153 over 1m), are significant. Almost 50 % of the length of significant rivers has been regulated; the largest continuous regulation is located in the middle stretch of the Morava River. Other anthropogenic pressures Past uranium mining activities in the Dolni Rozinka region are a potential pressure in groundwater quality assessment in the Morava River Basin. Web-links: www.env.cz www.vuv.cz